PAGE
SEPNZ BULLETIN
ISSUE 12. DECEMBER 2019
Student Month: ACL reconstruction return to soccer—P16 Reducing the Risk of Patellofemoral Pain in Runners—P24
p32 SPRINZ: Rate of Force Development (RFD)
p35 Paediatric Resistance Training: Benefits, Concerns, and Program Design Considerations.
p38 UPCOMING SEPNZ COURSES
www.sepnz.org.nz
PAGE 2
SEPNZ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Members Page
President - Blair Jarratt Vice-President - Timofei Dovbysh Secretary - Michael Borich Treasurer - Timofei Dovbysh Website - Hamish Ashton Sponsorship - Emma Lattey Committee Emma Clabburn Rebecca Longhurst Justin Lopes Emma Lattey
EDUCATION SUB-COMMITTEE Rebecca Longhurst (Chairperson) Emma Clabburn Justin Lopes Dr Grant Mawston
Visit www.sepnz.org.nz
Join us on Facebook
Follow us on Instagram
Follow us on Twitter
ADDITIONAL USEFUL WEBSITE RESOURCES: List of Open Access Journals Asics Apparel - how to order McGraw-Hill Books and order form
BULLETIN EDITOR Emma Clabburn
Asics Education Fund information Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) International Federation of Sports Physical Therapy (IFSPT)
SPECIAL PROJECTS Karen Carmichael Rose Lampen-Smith Amanda O’Reilly Pip Sail
BULLETIN ADVERTISING DEADLINES: February Bulletin: 31st January April Bulletin: 31st March June Bulletin: 31st May August Bulletin: 31st July October Bulletin: 30th September December Bulletin: 30th November Advertising terms & conditions click here.
CONTACT US Michael Borich (Secretary) 26 Vine St, St Marys Bay, Auckland secretary@sepnz.co.nz
PAGE 3
CONTENTS SEPNZ MEMBERS PAGE See our page for committee members, links & member information
2
EDITORIAL: By SEPNZ President Blair Jarratt
4
CONFERENCE REPORT: ASICS Sports Medicine Australia Conference 2019
5
APP REVIEW: The Ottawa Rules App
9
GET TO KNOW YOUR EXEC: Emma Lattey
11
MEMBER BENEFITS: Discounts
12
ASICS ARTICLE: Dual Density Midsoles
14
FEATURE ARTICLE: ACL reconstruction return-to-soccer: Strength or Function? Budi Pranjoto
16
FEATURE ARTICLE: Reducing the Risk of Patellofemoral Pain in Runners. Thomas Wardhaugh
24
SPRINZ: Rate of Force Development (RFD) by Chris Juneau
32
CLINICAL REVIEW: Paediatric Resistance Training: Benefits, Concerns, and Program Design Considerations.
35
UPCOMING SEPNZ COURSES
38
RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS: BJSM December 2019 - Volume 53 - 23
39
CLASSIFIEDS
40
PAGE 4
EDITORIAL Welcome to our last bulletin for 2019.
We are keeping with tradition and making this edition our Student Special. Over the last number of weeks, our physiotherapy schools and employers have been preparing to welcome the newcomers to our profession. Congratulations to our 2019 graduates from AUT and Otago, we hope you have a great time and come back in 2020 refreshed and eager to start your career. Congratulations to our SEPNZ winners Kirsty Burrows from AUT and Sophie Maxtone from Otago. Kirsty was a member of the NZ U24 Women’s Underwater Hockey Team who won gold at the Age Group World Championships earlier this year. In addition to her sporting success, Kirsty achieved excellent grades throughout her physiotherapy degree. Well done Kirsty. Sophie completed a national survey on how physiotherapists are involved in the recognition, assessment and management of concussion in New Zealand. This topic continues to grow, and now more than ever it is important that as physiotherapists we are part of the team helping with recognition, treatment medically and with key funders. Great topic Sophie! As this issue is all about celebrating our students, we have two excellent articles submitted from Otago University. Budi Pranjoto has provided an excellent article as part of his post graduate Sports Physiotherapy paper exploring function and strength and the interplay between these variables post ACL reconstruction. This essay is a great read and will really get you thinking about strength and functional testing of clearance for sport and or the risk of ACL re-rupture. Thomas Warburgh completed a literature review for his Otago Sports Physiotherapy paper on patellofemoral pain in runners. This is a common problem seen clinically and Thomas's review explores potential risk factors and strategies targeted at reducing these - including a handy diagram.
recommend looking at our SEPNZ courses, particularly the Sideline Management course. A very hot course for 2020 we will be running a pilot Australian Physiotherapy Association level 1 course which is part of the pathway to an APA titled Sports Physiotherapist. We have dates for a Lower Limb in Sport and are looking to run our Injury Prevention and Sports Enhancement early in 2020, there are plenty of options. More information on these courses and dates can be found on page 40 of this bulletin. The Executive and Education Subcommittee would like to extend a huge thank you to our departing Education Subcommittee members Angela Cadogan and Chris Whatman. Their contribution and commitment to developing and providing fantastic Sports Physiotherapy education to our members over the years had been instrumental in our ability to deliver quality Sports Physiotherapy content to members. A special thank you must go to Angela who steered the ship for several years as chairperson. We will miss them both but wish them well with their future endeavors. So, when all is said and done - kick back and relax with some light reading from SEPNZ. From all of us here at the SEPNZ Executive - Merry Christmas, enjoy your holidays with family and friends, stay safe and we will see you back in 2020. Over and out.
Kind Regards Blair Jarratt SEPNZ President
This bulletin the executive focus is on Emma Lattey who is the newcomer to our team, and she has also provided the recent app reviews. This month Emma has picked out a clinical gem with an APP review on the Ottawa rules. This APP looks highly useful for all clinicians and is again free so head over to the app store and download this one straight away! Earlier this year we, as part of our SEPNZ – ASICS prize, sent Lee-Anne Taylor to the Sunshine Coast. Thanks Lee-Anne for the excellent round up of your time away at the ASICS Sports Medicine Australia conference on “Exercise is Medicine”. We are glad you found the content and destination an amazing experience. Members keep your eyes out for next year’s prize trip and applications for the ASICS grants which are part of our ongoing sponsorship arrangement. All you runners out there (or those of you that treat runners) should read Chris Bishops article on page 14 - courtesy of ASICS. There are some interesting points on dual density shoes and every runner likes a performance benefit with no extra effort. Talking about CPD – now is a great time to start to plan 2020’s courses. If you are involved in sport, we highly
Exec Member Justin Lopes with Kirsty Burrows
PAGE 5
CONFERENCE REPORT
ASICS Sports Medicine Australia Conference 2019, Sunshine Coast Thank you to ASICS for this awesome opportunity to
some of us we have a good fortune to be able to
attend
(SMA)
work with and monitor athletes in a performance
conference and to SEPNZ for supporting this! To
environment, so have very clear baselines and
Chris Horrocks from ASICS and his podiatry
norms for that person to work with.
comrades’, I’m glad you are all fit and healthy and
emphasis on the whole - collect information on well-
able to run long distances as your navigation skills
being – sleep, stress, mind-sets, nutrition and
need a bit of professional development!
hydration.
the
appreciated
Sports
your
Medicine
Australia
sponsorship,
I really
insights
and
unplanned tourist opportunities!
There was
In a clinical setting I would say the
challenge for us all is to collect more informative data on our clients than just their presenting condition to have
a
holistic
approach.
Within the sport
“Exercise is Medicine” is the focus of this review and
performance environment map a clear framework to
an overarching theme of the conference.
link to your outcomes goals, provide feedback in real
physiotherapists
working
with
exercise
As as
a
time and have honest conversations.
treatment modality we are well placed to be engaged
in multiple facets of exercise - Prehab (Injury and disease prevention); Rehabilitation and Performance. Start with the end goal in mind, what is the outcome that needs to be achieved?
Understand what
components are required to be evaluated, monitored and achieved.
What the requirements are for the
end outcome e.g. motor control, stability, mobility, strength and conditioning, psychological profiling and performance measures (Professor Phil Glasgow Head of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Irish
Rugby Football Union).
While presented with a
performance perspective, good advice to heed with any client. Please note this presentation was given a few days after the All Blacks destroyed Ireland in the quarter finals, so well done Phil on a great presentation! Individualise always Carrying on from above know your individual – for
Image: Professor Phil Glasgow slide from keynote address Individualise except for kids’ device time – let’s understand the relationship between devices and CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 6
CONFERENCE REPORT flourishing and get some guidelines on their use! The increase in mental health issues within children ages 10-14 in Canada is a concern and potentially a global trend. The Compass study is a prospective cohort project monitoring 90,000 secondary school children, with some interesting insights https:// uwaterloo.ca/compass-system/compass-systemprojects/compass-study (Professor Guy Faulkner, University of British Columbia). Loading monitoring and management Tissue healing and appropriate loading was a key focus in performance sport (Professor Phil Glasgow), understand the individuals’ previous tissue injuries, understand the tissue response both theoretically and individually, load appropriately, create tissue
Performance models are unstable and cannot be
adaptation, monitor and progress (avoid sudden
used practically for predictive purposes. Despite the
changes) accordingly.
fact that there is stronger evidence for using internal load, most practitioners in team sports prefer
Monitoring
systems
are
designed
to
provide
external load measures of training.
Athletes self-
information that can be used to inform coaches’
reported measures have stronger support and better
decision making and improve the training process,
feasibility than most objective athlete response
Professor Aaron Coutts, University of Technology
measure, however these are often not validated and
Sydney explored the current literature to provide the
we should be wary of them. In summary, training is
following insights.
“Fitness-fatigue model” and the
complex and practitioners need to embrace the
“Training process framework” provide a conceptual
uncertainty and use their clinical making skills for the
bases for athlete monitoring with the goals of
individual. In other words there is no magic bullet!
improving performance readiness and reducing injury risk through controlled training. There is little high
Physical activity is positive psychology in motion –
level evidence to show relationships between training
physical activity has the capacity to prevent mental
load and performance and/or injury in team sports
illness, foster positive emotions and teach individuals
and the currently training load models do not fit the
to buffer against the stresses of life and thrive in
proposed mechanistic models for injury (See image
adversity (Professor Guy Faulkner).
below from Kalkhoven, Watsfor & Impellizzeri, 2019
PERMA elements – positive emotion, engagement,
retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/sportrxiv/vzxga/)
positive relationships, meaning and accomplishment
Using the
have been shown to increase happiness and wellbeing. “Butts in a boat” is a dragon boat rowing club for mean in the Vancouver area who have had a prostate
cancer
diagnosis
http://
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 7
CONFERENCE REPORT www.vancouverprostate.com/butts-in-a-boat/.
The
op, with the surgeon’s consent!
ability to monitor a particular group during an activity is beneficial within allied health alongside the
Research has also indicated that exposing children
obvious exercise profits. There’s the challenge NZ,
to different sports with multidirectional activities such
create meaningful programmes to target specific
as basketball, hockey and football creates a bone
groups for the delivery of exercise with the emphasis
tissue response that reduces stress fractures by
on the individual benefits.
50%, with better outcomes if the frequency has been prior to 10 years of age.
Earlier development of
Indeed Canada is well underway with it’s “Betters
cardiovascular fitness and muscular adaptation
campaign” based on following the trends in physical
allows for muscle memory and becomes easier for
activity of the nation have created a whole health
trained individuals to retrain. I have to say while my
campaign and resources for the nation https://
son has been involved in 10 different sports this year
www.participaction.com/en-ca. While I know we are
and getting him to and from everything has been a
into sport and exercise I couldn’t help but admire the
hassle, it’s great to have some evidence to support
breadth of their health campaign and emphasis on
the rationalisation of the petrol costs!
person monitoring. Several speakers referred to work within the Australian schools - “Burn to Learn” https:// app.education.nsw.gov.au/sport/File/3496 and “Iplay” Iplay.org.au are examples of programs to support
schools with the delivery of physical activity; Burn to Learn using high intensity interval training (HIIT) and Iplay skill development resources. Continued engagement in physical activity has not only physical benefits but also mental health. Prescribing Exercise like the Medicine it is was Professor Maria Fiatarone Singh, University of Sydney reviewing medication verses exercise effects Image:
Retrieved
from
https://
www.participaction.com/en-ca/everything-better/poop -better
young adults such as Cognitive dysfunction/brain atrophy, Depression, Hypertension, Hyperlipidaemia, Insomnia,
Start early! Early loading of tissue can lead to early return to play in elite sport (Professor Phil Glasgow), it was suggested for every day delayed for starting rehabilitation there was an increased 3.3 days to return to sport.
across the age ranges. Consider chronic diseases in
Within their environment shoulder
reconstructions surgeries begin loading 1 week post
Systematic
inflammation
and
Insulin
resistance/Glucose intolerance, with the exception of the last one there are no drugs available but research
indicates
exercise
is
an
effective
intervention. As we continue to age exercise therapy is still effective in comparison with drug therapy. With resistance training and cardiovascular training commonly
prescribed
but
current
research
is
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 8
CONFERENCE REPORT showing moderate intensity exercise delivered for 150 minutes per week can reduce mortality. Certainly frailty can be combated through resistance activities using our normal training parameters of 7080% of 1RM. So as we age we must consider the therapeutic benefits of resistance training for falls prevention etc. Exercise can be used as an intervention instead of
surgery.
Controversial work from Professor Ewa
Roos, Professor and Head of Research Unit, University
of
randomised provided
Southern
controlled
pain
relief,
Denmark
trials
where
68%
clinical
reviewing exercises relevant
improvements in function, postponement of TKJR surgery for 2 out of 3 subjects for 2 years with no serious adverse reactions. Of course prevention is the best medicine, given that 65% of OA joints (in Australia) are related to obesity
and joint injury.
Injury prevention protocols for
football and netball have good evidence of reducing injury risks.
Image: Sharon Kearney, Netball NZ
The movement of the strengthening
component of the 11+ to the end of training has improved compliance alongside the addition of the Copenhagen adduction to the strengthening regime. Great to see Sharon Kearney from Netball NZ had a poster presentation at the event about the reduction
Again thank you for the amazing opportunity to attend this conference, I feel incredibly inspired by what I heard and will be working towards change. “The first step towards getting somewhere is to decide that you are not going to stay where you are� JP Morgan
in injury rates post NetballSmart re-launching.
While we are a group that is predominantly focused within Sport and Exercise, I would challenge us to all start thinking outside of our clinical environments and apply our knowledge into the community. implement
and
research
sport
and
Create, exercise
programmes and continue to push for a more active (and healthy) society.
Lee-Anne Taylor is a physiotherapist with a passion for injury prevention in youth. She works in education at the Eastern Institute of Technology in the Hawkes bay, lecturing in sport and exercise science and researching injury prevention programmes in Netball and Basketball.
PAGE 9
APP REVIEW
Back to the App... Your App Review The Ottawa Rules App Merry Christmas to all you awesome sports physios out there! This month’s app review is of the Ottawa Rules
App which is a simple an effective medical app that is worth a download this festive, summer sports season. The Ottawa Rules are a set of clinical decision rules developed at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and the University of Ottawa, Canada. The rules have been demonstrated to decrease unnecessary diagnostic imaging and emergency room wait times which enhances patient comfort and reduces health care costs. This medical app is part of a study and according to the authors will be expanded to include other Ottawa Rules soon.
What it is used for?
Seller: Size: Version: Category: Compatibility:
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute 61.8 MB 3.0.2 Medical Requires iOS 9.0 or later. Apple and Android
Languages: Age rating: Copyright: Price:
English 12+ Ó 2016 Dr Ian Stiell Free
This app was developed to make the Ottawa Rules more accessible.
Who would benefit from this App? Student and new grad physios, physios with sporting teams, and any health care providers who treat patients with musculoskeletal injuries. The Ottawa Rules included are:- C-Spine, Knee, Ankle, CT Head, Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), and Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) Rule. PRACTICAL APPLICATION I know that many of us have used the Ottawa ankle/knee and Canadian C-spine Rules for many years and likely feel competent with our assessment of whether an individual requires imaging. However, it doesn’t hurt to have a handy little app on our phones just in case we need to refresh our knowledge or double check clinical decision making in an acute musculoskeletal setting. The app is extremely easy to use by just ticking a box or boxes (or none) the app tells you whether diagnostic imaging is necessary. I would highly recommend this app for physio students or new grads, and for the rest of us it is a super quick and handy tool to have at our fingertips. CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 10
APP REVIEW
Pros:
• • • • • •
Excellent and simple to use interface with quality illustrations and algorithms to apply rules at point of care High quality videos showing the author applying the rules by the bedside on simulated patients Links to all validation studies for the rules Available for Apple and Android App is free Should help decrease the overuse of imaging for musculoskeletal injuries by making Ottawa Rules approachable to every provider
Cons:
• • •
Medical app lacks some specifics on evidence based medicine unless you view all of the videos or read the linked articles Doesn’t contain all the Ottawa Rules at this point, eg. lacks concussion rule Some reviewers prefer other calculator apps which contain versions of these rules as well as other many other clinical decision tools and formulas.
OVERALL RATING = 4.8 / 5
PAGE 11
GET TO KNOW YOUR EXEC… EMMA LATTEY.
What role do you play and how long have you been on the exec? Since Feb 2019 - I’m the newest member and have recently been handed over the baton for sponsorship duties for SEPNZ, and I write the bulletin app reviews. Life outside of SEPNZ I’ve recently returned to NZ after a few years away so am enjoying my quality family time as a good daughter and aunty to 7 beautiful humans. Previous teams worked with / sporting background.
Many years spent on the side-lines of NZ rugby fields, with teams including Wellington College 1st XV and Hurricanes Rugby U18s, and have worked with elite level AFL and netball teams in Australia. Favourite tune on a road trip…….. The Killers or Muse. Favourite sporting physiotherapy moment Making friends for life with coaches, medical team members, strength and conditioning coaches, and players who then end up contacting you with injury concerns from all over the world. Also, working with rugby players at school level all the way through to All Black level. Work – where, what, role Currently working for CAPE Physio in the Hastings Health Centre, but making the move to Auckland in Feb 2020 to work for UniSports which is exciting. Favourite /best or worst destination as touring Physio and why eg temperature, medical facilities etc The Wellington Rugby Sevens back in the glory days at the cake tin – best medical team and awesome imaging facilities.
MEMBER BENEFITS
PAGE 12
There are many benefits to be obtained from being an SEPNZ member. For a full list of Members’ Benefits visit http://sportsphysiotherapy.org.nz/benefits/
In each bulletin we will be highlighting individual member benefits in order to help members best utilise all benefits available.
issuu Our newsletters are available as a flip book online on ISSUU http://issuu.com/sportsphysiotherapynz There are also heaps of other resources on the site and a number of them have been grouped for your benefit. Click the “Stacks” button to find copies of sports related magazines for free. These include: Football Medic, Journal of Physiotherapy and Sports Medicine, Sports Performance and Technology and more.
Podcasts
Podcasts are recorded interviews or talks that are made available for access anytime. A number of sports medicine related podcasts are available which have been linked to our website. http://sportsphysiotherapy.org.nz/members/resources/freepodcasts
Journals
Not studying at present and miss the library at physio school? There are a number of journals that are available online for free. This list is increasing as more companies are developing free access journals, but please let Hamish know if you are aware of ones not on the list. We currently have a list of sports medicine, orthopaedic related and sports science. http://sportsphysiotherapy.org.nz/members/resources/journal/
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
ASICS ARTICLE
Dual Density Midsoles Dr. Chris Bishop PhD Is there a role for dual density midsoles in modern
range, despite evidence presented by Malisoux and co-
athletic shoes?
authors that some dual density designs are associated
Running is a popular activity. And despite a small popula-
with lower injury risk. So is there a role for dual density
tion that continue to support the barefoot and minimalist
midsoles in 2019? I want to delve into the best part of four
movement, most runners are wearing shoes. Each year,
years research to share our investigation findings and the
recreational runners purchase up to three pairs of running
two big lessons we learnt along the way.
shoes, with the purchases being in part motivated by the expectation of improved running performance. But how
Lesson 1: Not all dual density systems are the
do we identify the right shoe for an individual? Well de-
same.
spite the large number of running shoes sold each year,
I think its unfair to label dual density systems don’t work.
there are currently no criteria to help runners decide
Because the Brooks Adrenaline was a different design to
which is the best running shoe for them. This results in
the ASICS Kayano, which was then different to the NIKE
shoe selection based on subjective assessments of shoe
Structure Triax and New Balance 860. Some posts were
characteristics and anecdotally-based marketing literature
hard density. Some posts were different in geometric de-
and product information from shoe manufacturers, or vid-
sign. If we consider ASICS DUOMAX system, it is simply
eo gait analysis results from technical retail stores.
a thin (say 10mm thick) wall in the medial midsole in the midfoot that was never purported to act on the subtalar
Traditionally, running shoes have been categorised
joint, where as the former Adrenaline was a wall of stiffer
based on levels of support ranging from structured cush-
midsole material in the posterior heel of the shoe. Similar
ioning to motion control. Underpinning the concept of
concepts yet differing positions equals different purported
support is the presence of different midsole designs. Dual
function. Heck you could argue the Nimbus is a dual den-
density footwear (characterised by two differing density
sity system in the past with fluid ride midsole system actu-
layers of a midsole) has been a keepsake of athletic foot-
ally being composed of two differing midsole materials
wear design for the best part of 30 years. The long held
which will each respond in different ways.
belief was that dual density midsoles stopped the foot from pronating through loading response and midstance,
If we are going to make conclusive statements about
as well as providing medial stability to the shoe. Despite
something working/not working, you have to be comparing
this anecdotal categorisation of running shoes, evidence
apples with apples.
from the literature does not support the premise the foot-
wear can control motion [1]. However, runners continue
Lesson 2: The literature hasn’t actually properly in-
to purchase this shoe on the basis that it feels more com-
vestigated the effects of these designs on running
fortable and stable for them when they run.
biomechanics. When you look at the design of most studies investigating
There has no doubt been a lot of pressure with regards to
dual density footwear, the outcomes used are a result of
the effect of this type of footwear and whether it should
the instantaneous effects of the shoe, and it is therefore
still exist of recent times. Largely anecdotal and pseudo
unknown what the acquired effect of the shoe is overtime,
expert opinion without a huge amount of published evi-
whether that be after defined periods of running or accu-
dence to support such strong statements. There are cer-
mulative periods of wear.
tainly brands removing dual density systems from their CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 15
ASICS ARTICLE This design error becomes really important in terms of clinical translation. Runners often don’t report issues straight away, but more so 5-10kms into a run. The question has to be asked what is happening at this point when someone starts to experience symptoms? Perhaps they are getting tired and the function of the body (not just foot and ankle) is changing. Not ignoring the role of age of shoes in performance, but fatigue has been shown to reduce performance. Research suggests that stride patterns deterio-
rate in the presence of fatigue ( or running near exhaustion)[2], increased rearfoot eversion magnitude and velocity [3-5], a decrease in step time / shorter stride length / increased cadence [6], reduced plantar loading [2, 6], reduced peak vertical GRF [7, 8] and reduced leg-spring behaviour [2, 7]. This is of interest as the role of footwear as a ‘protective’ mechanism to changes in postural demand (e.g. fatigue) rather than a ‘motion control’ system to change foot function has not been evaluated. Given our internal wear test data suggests that shoes with varying midsole densities are more stable, it is plausible to hypothesise that the effect of such shoes may not be one
of motion control, but of improved stability in the presence
shoe mass, it was between 2 and 7 grams. We then got people to run both fresh and in the presence of fatigue (with fatigue created in a protocol where participants were asked to run back-to-back 3km time trials as quick as they could). What we found was instantaneously, there was a physiological benefit (2%) running in the DuoMAX shoe regardless of foot posture, with the benefit increasing to 3% when running in the presence of fatigue. This also translated into a performance benefit, with the dual density shoe assisting in maintaining performance (i.e. faster time trial performance in the dual density shoe)
in the presence of fatigue. This was measured as a 6.8s improvement in 3km time trial performance, equating to an improvement of some 24 m. This is a clear and substantial benefit of the DUOMAX design feature. And something that should be considered in a lot of recreational runners…fatigue influences performance! So to sum up…is there a role for dual density systems in modern athletic shoes? Based on our data, the answer is YES. And that is why it is exciting to see DUOMAX continue in the latest evolution of GT 2000-8.
of changes to postural demand (e.g. exerted state or fa-
But we can’t say the results we found are applicable to all
tigue).
dual density systems. Different systems will work different-
This last point has driven me to search for answers on what the DUOMAX system in ASICS footwear actually does. It has been in Kayano for 26 years. It’s sat within most stability models in the range. And yet we didn’t (nor did the industry) have a really good understanding of what it actually did. So what did we do to investigate this?
I presented our work on this recently at the Footwear Biomechanics Congress in Kannaskis, Canada. For those interested, the abstract is published in Footwear Science from the meetings proceedings. But we built two versions
ly, and individuals will respond differently to each system. And yes I am sure there are other design concepts that may be able to achieve similar effects. Let me be clear that the results we found were specific to ASICS DUOMAX midsole system. The concept of shoe design is about providing a depth of choice for runners. Where we now need to head and more our attention towards is how best to identify runners in need of these type of features in their shoes. That’s another discussion all together… References—on request
of the Kayano 23 in the factory, with the only difference between the shoes being the presence (or lack of) DUOMAXTM design. For those interested in the difference in
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 16
FEATURE ARTICLES
ACL reconstruction return-to-soccer: Strength or Function? Budiman Pranjoto (Budi), BBiomedSc (FUHB), BPhty, PGDipPhty (OMT) Introduction Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the more common and serious injuries sustained by football players, some even requiring surgical reconstruction (Bizzini, Hancock, & Impellizzeri, 2012). However, the rehab protocol for soccer players returning to sport after ACL reconstruction is not well defined (Bizzini, et al. 2012). A concern for athletes who have had an ACL reconstruction is the incidence of reinjury and surgical revision (Nagelli & Hewett, 2016). There are multiple aspects to return-to-sport after an ACL reconstruction, such as nutrition, general health, biomedical and psychological readiness. However, as physiotherapists, we generally “clear” an athlete to return-to-sport after they achieve good mobility (range of motion) with good strength and/or function relevant to their sport. For the purpose of this written assignment, we will primarily discuss rehabilitation goals and tests that are grounded around strength compared to function. This essay will discuss recent evidence around strength vs. function for return-to-sport for soccer players after an ACL reconstruction. I will discuss pros and cons for each of them and when strength or function is more
appropriate if one of them is superior to one another. For clarification, I define strength as a performance measure (e.g. peak torque) to produce an isolated movement (e.g. knee extension), while function is the ability to produce movement involving multiple joints in a functional pattern (e.g. hopping). When are strength or functional measures more appropriate? test.
Does strength affect function? While strength is defined as an isolated movement measure, it is important to consider that strength may result in better function as well. Schmitt, Paterno, and Hewett (2012) demonstrated this very well. Ninety
soccer players were involved in their study, 55 had undergone
ACL
reconstruction
and
35
were
uninjured. Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of quadriceps femoris was measured on both legs to give a quadriceps index for symmetry (involved/uninvolved × 100%). The 55 players with ACL reconstruction were then sub-grouped to those with high quadriceps index (≥90%), and low (<80%). The functional measurement outcome was a hop
The players that had ACL reconstruction and high quadriceps index performed similarly in the hop test compared to uninjured controls. However, the players that had ACL reconstruction but had low quadriceps
index (asymmetry), performed significantly worse in the hop test compared to uninjured controls. The result of this study brings evidence to what is intuitively understood that strength and functional outcome measures may not be two independent variables – but one can affect another. It is important that in this study, causality was not established between the two variables, correlation is found but strength does not necessarily lead to function and CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 17
FEATURE ARTICLE function does not lead to strength.
strength and circumference compared to the control group. This study showed that NMES was an
A similar study by Clagg, Paterno, Hewett, and
effective treatment to improve strength gain.
Schmitt (2015) was completed with modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT) and isokinetic
Another study by Paillard, Noe, Bernard, Dupui, and
dynamometry. Sixty-six participants who have had a
Hazard (2008) also investigated the effects of NMES
unilateral ACL reconstruction and 47 uninjured
with a vertical jump test – a functional measure. The
participants (controls) were tested. The participants
study included 27 healthy trained students. They
with ACL reconstruction were tested at the time of
were divided into three groups: controls, NMES for
return to sport. mSEBT included the anterior,
strength
posterolateral
and
parameters). The participants performed vertical
quantify
jump tests at the beginning of the study, at one week
strength. The participants with ACL reconstruction
and at five weeks at the end of the study after
had significantly lower anterior reach distance in the
completing their NMES programme or control. The
mSEBT on the involved and uninvolved limbs
groups
compared to the uninjured participants (controls).
endurance significantly increased their vertical jump
Furthermore, they found an association between the
height in the test, showing NMES was effective in
lower mSEBT anterior reach distance and lower
improving a functional measure.
isokinetic
and
posteromedial
dynamometry
was
used
reaches to
and
that
NMES
received
for
endurance
NMES
for
(different
strength
or
extremity muscle strength measured in the isokinetic dynamometry. This demonstrates once again that
These two studies showed that NMES was an
strength and function are not two independent
effective treatment that improves both strength and
variables but may be associated with each other.
function. This is consistent with the first point of the discussion: strength and function may not be two
Can a treatment or rehabilitation protocols affect both? A study by Taradaj, et al. (2013) investigated the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for soccer athletes post-ACL reconstruction. Eighty soccer
athletes
post-ACL
reconstruction
were
involved in this study, who were then divided into
NMES (n=40) and control (n=40) groups. Both the control and NMES group underwent the same treatment rehabilitation protocols, including functional and progressive resisted exercises. The NMES group had NMES applied three days a week for a month. Both the control and NMES groups increased quadriceps muscle strength measured by tensometry
independent variables, and physiotherapy may be able to improve both at the same time. In the scope of this essay, I will not delve into different treatments that would affect both or one but not the other – I will focus on strength vs. functional goals/tests. A point to note is that in Paillard, Noe, Bernard, Dupui, and Hazard’s 2008 study, they did not have soccer players or athletes as participants, and they were healthy participants. That may mean that their results may not be directly applicable to soccer players post-ACL reconstruction. However, these two studies still point to the finding that a single treatment may have effects on strength and on function.
and quadriceps circumference. However, the NMES group had increased significantly more in quadriceps CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 18
FEATURE ARTICLE Good function and poor strength
not show a statistical difference in the YBT-LQ
It is generally accepted that if the soccer players are
scores (both independent and composite scores).
not ready to return to sport if they have poor strength
Similarly, the cleared and not cleared groups did not
and function –(Arundale, Silvers-Granelli, & Snyder-
show a statistical difference in the FMS composite
Mackler, 2018). The fact that strength and function
scores. This suggests similar results to Herrington, et
are not necessarily two independent variables as
al. (2018) that people post-ACL reconstruction can
demonstrated above are also convenient in making
“pass” their functional measures, but “fail” the
return-to-sport protocol and tests. However, what
strength measures.
happens when the function test does not reflect the
however, FMS is composed of seven separate tests
strength test?
and their composite score will not be as valid as the
A criticism for this
study
individual scores on the seven tests which can each Herrington,
Ghulam,
and
Comfort
(2018)
be a “pass” or “fail” on their own.
demonstrated this phenomenon exactly in their study. Fifteen full-time professional soccer players
This brings us to the question then: how do these
who have undergone ACL reconstruction were
people and athletes perform well functionally, but
involved in this study. Eccentric, concentric and
have poor strength? The answer may lie in the
isometric peak torque strength were measured and
original definition of strength. Strength was measured
compared to their distances in a single hop for
in an isolated single joint performance, while function
distance
–
usually involves multiple joints working together. This
normalised to their leg length. The injured and
may mean contribution from other joints and muscle
uninjured leg were compared for symmetry with the
groups may hide strength deficits that are present in
goal of ≥90% for both strength and hop distance.
isolation. Hence, functional tests are not sensitive
Herrington, Ghulam, and Comfort (2018) found that
enough to detect isolated strength deficits which was
more than 80% of the players did not achieve ≥90%
also described by Thomeé, et al. (2011) in their
symmetry for strength, while 67-73% achieved ≥90%
review – asking for more sensitive tests.
and
cross-over
hop
for
distance
symmetry for the hop tests. This showed that majority
of
participants
had
good
functional
outcomes, but poor strength measures.
Most
of
the
evidence
investigating
functional
measures usually also include one or two functional measures (e.g. single hop distance, mSEBT, cross-
Mayer, et al. (2015) found similar results with a
over hop distance), while this is easily reproducible
different set of measurements. Clinical impairments,
and consistent, real-life soccer players do not just
including
were
hop or reach on the spot. Soccer players perform
measured and 98 patients post-ACL reconstruction
wide and diverse functional movements with their
were group in either cleared or not cleared to return
movements (e.g. running, change in direction,
to sport by the orthopaedic surgeon performing the
kicking), which should be clinically checked before
clinical impairment measurements. A blinded tester
returning to sports. The other functional movements
then performs the Functional Movement Screen
may then show a strength deficit that was not
(FMS) and the Y Balance Test for Lower Quarter
detected from a hop or reach test alone.
isokinetic
quadriceps
strength,
(YBT-LQ) as the functional measures. The results showed that the cleared and not cleared groups did CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 19
FEATURE ARTICLE Good strength and poor function?
Paterno, et al. (2010) showed the importance of
Surprisingly at the time of this writing, there are no
neuromuscular control to predict a second ACL
evidence and examples in the literature of any
injury. There may be cases where soccer players
athlete having good strength but poor function,
who have had an ACL reconstruction have good
especially soccer athletes post-ACL reconstruction.
strength
However, there is no evidence of their absence
neuromuscular control, unable to utilise separate
either. It would not be too surprising for anecdotal
isolated muscular strength together to perform a
evidence and clinical evidence of strong and healthy
functional movement. The equipment used by
individuals or athletes being unable to perform
Patreno, et al. (2010) would not be available in most
simple functional tasks such as single leg stance.
clinical settings, but the principle in testing function
Similarly, there would be healthy individuals who are
to detect neuromuscular control deficit which may
unable to perform functional tests such as the FMS
predict a second ACL injury is still applicable.
but
poor
function
due
to
poor
well. Which would give a clear example of good strength but poor function.
Conclusions: Strength and function It has been established that strength and function
There is a prospective study by Paterno, et al. (2010)
may not be separate independent variables to test
which investigated landing and postural stability
or achieve, but one may affect another. Some
function using a 3-D motion analysis and Biodex SD
treatments such as NMES may also result in
Stability System. A drop vertical jump manoeuvre
improved both strength and function, though this
and postural stability assessment was analysed on
may not be the case for all treatments and
56 athletes who have had an ACL reconstruction and
rehabilitation protocols. However, in the context of
followed for occurrence of a second ACL injury.
return-to-sport tests and criteria, these two are not
Valgus movement, asymmetry in internal knee
independent variables.
extensor moment and a deficit in single-leg postural stability of the involved limb were specific predictive
Despite strength and function being associated,
parameters. On top of that, hip rotation moment
should we test one, or both? It appears that
independently predicted second ACL injury (C =
functional tests are not sufficiently sensitive to
0.81) with high sensitivity (0.77) and specificity
detect isolated strength deficits, possibly because
(0.81).
altered
other joints and/or muscles can come in to
neuromuscular control of the hip and knee during the
compensate for the strength deficit. However, on a
functional tasks are predictors of a second ACL
similar note, neuromuscular control seems to be a
injury.
strong predictor of a second ACL injury in athletes
The study by Paterno, et al. (2010) demonstrated the
which cannot be ignored. There is an absence of
reason why clinicians perform functional tests in the
evidence showing that athletes can have good
first place: neuromuscular control. Neuromuscular
function but poor strength, hence appropriate
control is the ability to use the separate isolated parts
functional tests should still be performed to detect
(quadriceps and glute muscles) to perform together
neuromuscular control deficits. In conclusion, until
in a functional task. While there is no evidence of
evidence proves otherwise, strength and function
athletes having good strength but poor function or
should both be tested and soccer athletes who have
The
neuromuscular
authors
control
concluded
post-ACL
that
reconstruction, CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 20
FEATURE ARTICLE had an ACL reconstruction need to be able to pass
jump tests at the beginning of the study, at one
both tests to return-to-soccer.
week and at five weeks at the end of the study after
and isokinetic dynamometry was used to quantify
completing their NMES programme or control. The
strength. The participants with ACL reconstruction
groups
had significantly lower anterior reach distance in the
endurance significantly increased their vertical jump
mSEBT on the involved and uninvolved limbs
height in the test, showing NMES was effective in
compared to the uninjured participants (controls).
improving a functional measure.
that received
NMES
for
strength
or
Furthermore, they found an association between the lower mSEBT anterior reach distance and lower
These two studies showed that NMES was an
extremity muscle strength measured in the isokinetic
effective treatment that improves both strength and
dynamometry. This demonstrates once again that
function. This is consistent with the first point of the
strength and function are not two independent
discussion: strength and function may not be two
variables but may be associated with each other.
independent variables, and physiotherapy may be
Can a treatment or rehabilitation protocols affect both? A study by Taradaj, et al. (2013) investigated the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for soccer athletes post-ACL reconstruction. Eighty soccer
athletes
post-ACL
reconstruction
were
involved in this study, who were then divided into NMES (n=40) and control (n=40) groups. Both the control and NMES group underwent the same treatment rehabilitation protocols, including functional and progressive resisted exercises. The NMES group had NMES applied three days a week for a month. Both the control and NMES groups increased quadriceps muscle strength measured by tensometry and quadriceps circumference. However, the NMES
able to improve both at the same time. In the scope of this essay, I will not delve into different treatments that would affect both or one but not the other – I will focus on strength vs. functional goals/ tests. A point to note is that in Paillard, Noe, Bernard,
Dupui, and Hazard’s 2008 study, they did not have soccer players or athletes as participants, and they were healthy participants. That may mean that their results may not be directly applicable to soccer players post-ACL reconstruction. However, these two studies still point to the finding that a single treatment may have effects on strength and on function.
group had increased significantly more in quadriceps
Good function and poor strength
strength and circumference compared to the control
It is generally accepted that if the soccer players are
group. This study showed that NMES was an
not ready to return to sport if they have
effective treatment to improve strength gain.
strength and function –(Arundale, Silvers-Granelli, &
Another study by Paillard, Noe, Bernard, Dupui, and
Snyder-Mackler, 2018). The fact that strength and
Hazard (2008) also investigated the effects of NMES
function are not necessarily two independent
with a vertical jump test – a functional measure. The
variables
study included 27 healthy trained students. They
convenient in making return-to-sport protocol and
were divided into three groups: controls, NMES for
tests. However, what happens when the function
strength
test does not reflect the strength test?
and
NMES
for
endurance
(different
as
demonstrated
above
are
poor
also
parameters). The participants performed vertical CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 21
FEATURE ARTICLE Herrington,
Ghulam,
and
Comfort
(2018)
be a “pass” or “fail” on their own.
demonstrated this phenomenon exactly in their study. Fifteen full-time professional soccer players
This brings us to the question then: how do these
who have undergone ACL reconstruction were
people and athletes perform well functionally, but
involved in this study. Eccentric, concentric and
have poor strength? The answer may lie in the
isometric peak torque strength were measured and
original
compared to their distances in a single hop for
measured in an isolated single joint performance,
distance
–
while function usually involves multiple joints
normalised to their leg length. The injured and
working together. This may mean contribution from
uninjured leg were compared for symmetry with the
other joints and muscle groups may hide strength
goal of ≥90% for both strength and hop distance.
deficits that are present in isolation. Hence,
Herrington, Ghulam, and Comfort (2018) found that
functional tests are not sensitive enough to detect
more than 80% of the players did not achieve ≥90%
isolated strength deficits which was also described
symmetry for strength, while 67-73% achieved ≥90%
by Thomeé, et al. (2011) in their review – asking for
symmetry for the hop tests. This showed that
more sensitive tests.
majority
and
of
cross-over
participants
hop
had
for
good
distance
definition
of
strength.
Strength
was
functional
outcomes, but poor strength measures.
Most of the evidence investigating functional measures usually also include one or two functional
Mayer, et al. (2015) found similar results with a
measures (e.g. single hop distance, mSEBT, cross-
different set of measurements. Clinical impairments,
over hop distance), while this is easily reproducible
including
were
and consistent, real-life soccer players do not just
measured and 98 patients post-ACL reconstruction
hop or reach on the spot. Soccer players perform
were group in either cleared or not cleared to return
wide and diverse functional movements with their
to sport by the orthopaedic surgeon performing the
movements (e.g. running, change in direction,
clinical impairment measurements. A blinded tester
kicking), which should be clinically checked before
then performs the Functional Movement Screen
returning to sports. The other functional movements
(FMS) and the Y Balance Test for Lower Quarter
may then show a strength deficit that was not
(YBT-LQ) as the functional measures. The results
detected from a hop or reach test alone.
isokinetic
quadriceps
strength,
showed that the cleared and not cleared groups did not show a statistical difference in the YBT-LQ scores (both independent and composite scores). Similarly, the cleared and not cleared groups did not show a statistical difference in the FMS composite scores. This suggests similar results to Herrington, et al. (2018) that people post-ACL reconstruction can “pass” their functional measures, but “fail” the strength measures. A criticism for this study however, FMS is composed of seven separate tests and their composite score will not be as valid as the individual scores on the seven tests which can each
Good strength and poor function? Surprisingly at the time of this writing, there are no
evidence and examples in the literature of any athlete having good strength but poor function, especially soccer athletes post-ACL reconstruction. However, there is no evidence of their absence either. It would not be too surprising for anecdotal evidence and clinical evidence of strong and healthy individuals or athletes being unable to perform simple functional tasks such as single leg stance. Similarly, there would be healthy individuals CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 22
FEATURE ARTICLE who are unable to perform functional tests such as
control deficit which may predict a second ACL
the FMS well. Which would give a clear example of
injury is still applicable.
good strength but poor function. Conclusions: Strength and function There is a prospective study by Paterno, et al. (2010)
It has been established that strength and function
which investigated landing and postural stability
may not be separate independent variables to test
function using a 3-D motion analysis and Biodex SD
or achieve, but one may affect another. Some
Stability System. A drop vertical jump manoeuvre
treatments such as NMES may also result in
and postural stability assessment was analysed on
improved both strength and function, though this
56 athletes who have had an ACL reconstruction and
may not be the case for all treatments and
followed for occurrence of a second ACL injury.
rehabilitation protocols. However, in the context of
Valgus movement, asymmetry in internal knee
return-to-sport tests and criteria, these two are not
extensor moment and a deficit in single-leg postural
independent variables.
stability of the involved limb were specific predictive parameters. On top of that, hip rotation moment
Despite strength and function being associated,
independently predicted second ACL injury (C =
should we test one, or both? It appears that
0.81) with high sensitivity (0.77) and specificity
functional tests are not sufficiently sensitive to
(0.81).
altered
detect isolated strength deficits, possibly because
neuromuscular control of the hip and knee during the
other joints and/or muscles can come in to
functional tasks are predictors of a second ACL
compensate for the strength deficit. However, on a
injury.
similar note, neuromuscular control seems to be a
The
authors
concluded
that
strong predictor of a second ACL injury in athletes The study by Paterno, et al. (2010) demonstrated the
which cannot be ignored. There is an absence of
reason why clinicians perform functional tests in the
evidence showing that athletes can have good
first place: neuromuscular control. Neuromuscular
function but poor strength, hence appropriate
control is the ability to use the separate isolated parts
functional tests should still be performed to detect
(quadriceps and glute muscles) to perform together
neuromuscular control deficits. In conclusion, until
in a functional task. While there is no evidence of
evidence proves otherwise, strength and function
athletes having good strength but poor function or
should both be tested and soccer athletes who have
neuromuscular
had an ACL reconstruction need to be able to pass
control
post-ACL
reconstruction,
Paterno, et al. (2010) showed the importance of
both tests to return-to-soccer.
neuromuscular control to predict a second ACL injury. There may be cases where soccer players who have had an ACL reconstruction have good strength but poor function due to poor neuromuscular control, unable to utilise separate isolated muscular strength together to perform a functional movement. The equipment used by Patreno, et al. (2010) would not be available in most clinical settings, but the principle in testing function to detect neuromuscular CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 23
FEATURE ARTICLE Budiman Pranjoto (Budi) is a physiotherapist based in a private practice in Dunedin. He completed this essay towards the requirements of the post-graduate Sports Physiotherapy paper at the School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, as part of a PGDipPhty in Orthopaedic Manipulative Therapy. He works with various sports but a particular area of interest is in racket-based sports, especially badminton, squash and tennis. References Arundale, A. J. H., Silvers-Granelli, H. J., & Snyder-Mackler, L. (2018). Career Length and Injury Incidence After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Major League Soccer Players. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 6(1), 232596711775082. doi: 10.1177/2325967117750825 Bizzini, M., Hancock, D., & Impellizzeri, F. (2012). Suggestions From the Field for Return to Sports Participation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Soccer. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 42(4), 304–312. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4005 Clagg, S., Paterno, M. V., Hewett, T. E., & Schmitt, L. C. (2015). Performance on the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test at the Time of Return to Sport Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 45(6), 444–452. doi: 10.2519/ jospt.2015.5040
Herrington, L., Ghulam, H., & Comfort, P. (2018). Quadriceps Strength and Functional Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Soccer players at Time of Return to Sport. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 1. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002749 Mayer, S. W., Queen, R. M., Taylor, D., Moorman, C. T., Toth, A. P., Garrett, W. E., & Butler, R. J. (2015). Functional Testing Differences in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients Released Versus Not Released to Return to Sport. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(7), 1648–1655. doi: 10.1177/0363546515578249 Nagelli, C. V., & Hewett, T. E. (2016). Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations. Sports Medicine, 47(2), 221–232. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0584-z
Paillard, T., Noe, F., Bernard, N., Dupui, P., & Hazard, C. (2008). Effects of Two Types of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training on Vertical Jump Performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22(4), 1273–1278. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181739e9c Paterno, M. V., Schmitt, L. C., Ford, K. R., Rauh, M. J., Myer, G. D., Huang, B., & Hewett, T. E. (2010). Biomechanical Measures during Landing and Postural Stability Predict Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Return to Sport. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 38(10), 1968–1978. doi: 10.1177/0363546510376053 Schmitt, L. C., Paterno, M. V., & Hewett, T. E. (2012). The Impact of Quadriceps Femoris Strength Asymmetry on Functional Performance at Return to Sport Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 42(9), 750–759. doi: 10.2519/
PAGE 24
FEATURE ARTICLES
Reducing the Risk of Patellofemoral Pain in Runners Thomas Wardhaugh, BPhty (Hons) Introduction In New Zealand, running is one of the most common sporting activities participated in by young people and adults (Sport NZ, 2017). Running is frequently associated with lower limb injuries (Taunton et al., 2002), with the knee being the most commonly injured joint. Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is the most common specific injury in running, accounting for 17% of all injuries (Francis, Whatman, Sheerin, Hume, & Johnson, 2019). A recent systematic review by Smith et al. (2018) found an annual incidence of PFP in the general population of 22.7%, and 28.9% in adolescents. In active populations, reported incidences of PFP range from 3-15% (Neal, Barton, Gallie, Oâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;Halloran, & Morrissey, 2016). As injury is likely the most common reason for novice runners to discontinue running (Fokkema et al., 2019), identification of risk factors for PFP and how these may be addressed, is important. This review of literature will identify a number of potential risk factors for PFP and review strategies targeted at reducing these.
What is Patellofemoral Pain?
Demographic and Anthropometric Factors:
PFP is characterised by diffuse pain of the anterior
Taunton et al. (2002) found a higher incidence of
knee, either retropatellar or peripatellar in nature
PFP in women compared to men. This has since
(Neal et al., 2019). It is most commonly aggravated
been disputed in two high quality review articles
by loaded knee flexion, such as squatting, ascending
finding no statistically significant association with PFP
stairs or descending stairs. Numerous structures can
and sex, age, or body mass index (BMI) (Neal et al.,
contribute
2016; Neal et al., 2019).
to
nociception
in
PFP,
including;
subchondral bone, infrapatellar fat pad, retinaculum
Muscular Changes:
and ligamentous structures, however the exact cause
Changes in the strength and activation of muscles of
is not known (Powers, Witvrouw, Davis, & Crossley,
the knee and hip have been long thought to be
2017). A widely cited paper by Dye (2005) introduced
associated
a pathophysiological model of PFP, focusing on a
(EMG) studies focussed on function of the vastus
disruption of tissue homeostasis in the patellofemoral
medialis oblique (VMO) compared with that of vastus
joint (PFJ) caused by factors such as inflammation.
lateralis (VL) in subjects with PFP. Multiple studies
The contribution of central pain mechanisms and
have found associations between PFP and delayed
psychosocial
contraction and decreased amplitude of VMO versus
factors must
also
be
considered
with
PFP.
Earlier
electromyography
(Powers et al., 2017).
VL (Cesarelli, Bifulco, & Bracale, 2000; Owings &
Risk Factors for PFP
Grabiner, 2002). However, a 2008 systematic review
A number of potential risk factors for PFP have been
found
hypothesised and researched, however there is
dysfunction and PFP based on the heterogeneity of
conflicting evidence for many of these factors.
study
no
clear
design,
association significant
between
normal
VMO-VL
inter-subject
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 25
FEATURE ARTICLE variability and the potential for bias in many studies
Dingenen,
2019).
(Chester et al., 2008).
differences
have
This said, generalised
Numerous been
biomechanical
studied
in
multiple
quadriceps weakness may be a risk factor (Neal et
populations, with the heterogeneity of variables
al., 2019).
studied, and study designs, contributing to the
More recent literature has focused on the association
limited conclusive evidence available.
of proximal muscle strength with PFP. Interestingly,
Magnitude of peak hip adduction moment is
results have been conflicting when comparing cross-
associated with increased PFJ stress (John D
sectional studies to prospective study designs. A
Willson & Davis, 2008), therefore it is reasonable to
cross-sectional study by Cowan, Crossley, and
suggest that hip adduction may be associated with
Bennell (2009) assessed the EMG activity of gluteus
PFP and subsequently, a number of studies have
medius (GM), VMO and VL as well as hip abduction
investigated this. In a prospective study of 400
and trunk side flexor strength in participants with and
female runners, those who developed PFP during
without PFP. Their findings showed a delay in GM
the two year study period were found to exhibit
and VMO activation as well as reduced trunk side
significantly greater hip adduction angle during
flexion strength in participants with a history of PFP.
running (Brian Noehren, Hamill, & Davis, 2013).
These findings are supported by baseline data
Whereas, in a cohort of collegiate cross country
measured by Ferber, Kendall, and Farr (2011) in
runners, increased hip adduction moment was not
their study investigating the effects of a hip abductor
found to increase risk of RRI, including PFP
strengthening
PFP.
(Dudley, Pamukoff, Lynn, Kersey, & Noffal, 2017).
Contrastingly, data from prospective studies has
Inconsistencies between studies may be due to the
found hip strength to decrease from baseline levels
small sample size in this paper (n=31) and relatively
in subjects who developed PFP during the follow-up
short follow up period (14 weeks). Peak rear-foot
period (Finnoff et al., 2011; Thijs, Pattyn, Van
eversion was originally thought to be a risk factor
Tiggelen,
Hip
for PFP, however this more recent literature does
abduction strength was even found to be greater in
not support this (Neal et al., 2016). Biomechanical
young basketballers who developed PFP (Herbst et
abnormalities appear in many individuals with PFP,
al., 2015). These findings suggest that weakness
however, these may occur secondary to PFP and
may occur secondary to PFP, rather than being
do not necessarily worsen with increasingly difficult
causal as was previously thought. Pooled data from
physical tasks (Willson & Davis, 2008).
systematic reviews supports this suggestion (Neal et
Sagittal plane biomechanics related to landing
al., 2019; Rathleff, Rathleff, Crossley, & Barton,
strategies during running have been shown to effect
2014).
PFJ loading, which may lead to PFP. Runners who
protocol
Rombaut,
for
&
runners
Witvrouw,
with
2011).
fore-foot strike (FFS) were shown to have reduced Biomechanical
and
Spatiotemporal
PFJ loading compared with those who rear-foot
Characteristics of Running:
strike (RFS) (Kulmala, Avela, Pasanen, & Parkkari,
Despite the belief that biomechanical factors play a
2013).
strong role in affecting risk of running-related injury
The spatiotemporal characteristics of running are
(RRI), limited evidence exists to support these claims
also important to consider. These include factors
(Ceyssens,
such as step length and cadence (step rate). A 10%
Vanelderen,
Barton,
Malliaras,
&
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 26
FEATURE ARTICLE increase in step length results in a 31% increase in
but not specified) in boys but not girls (Tenforde et
PFJ stress per step, equating to a 14% increase in
al., 2011). The effect of rapid increase in training on
load per mile. Moreover, 10% decrease accounts for
increased RRI risk was supported by prospective
a 22% decrease in loading per step, 7.5% decrease
data over a 1-year follow up period (Nielsen et al.,
per mile (Willson, Sharpee, Meardon, & Kernozek,
2014). Among a cohort of 874 healthy, novice
2014).
A 2014 systematic review analysed the
runners, those who increased their running load by
available literature regarding changes in step length
greater than 30% in a given week were at increased
during running and concluded that a shorter step
risk of distance related running injury, including PFP.
length results in reduced ground reaction force and
A popular method of maintaining safe progression of
subsequently, reduced absorption of force at the hip,
running training is the ‘10% rule’, where the
knee and ankle (Schubert, Kempf, & Heiderscheit,
maximum increase in training volume each week is
2014). Despite these reductions in ground reaction
10%. Buist et al. (2007) carried out a randomised
force
between
controlled trial (RCT) where novice runners preparing
increased cadence and PFP is yet to be shown in the
for a 4-mile (6.7 km) event were randomised into a
literature (Luedke, Heiderscheit, Williams, & Rauh,
‘standard training group’ who carried out an 8 week
2016).
training programme, or a ‘graded training group’ who
Training Load
performed a 13 week programme to reach the same
It is evident that there are a wide range of risk factors
point. Between groups, there was found to be no
for PFP in runners that may combine in individuals
differences in the incidence of RRI (PFP not
causing pain to arise, however these risk factors
specified). While this paper had a large sample size
rarely result in PFP in inactive individuals (Smith et
and was methodologically sound, the selected
al., 2018). It is often thought that a key component of
parameters of the ‘standard training group’ were far
PFP is simply an overload of tissues in the knee.
from the extremes often seen clinically. Perhaps, a
This may occur as a result of beginning running as a
more excessive running protocol for the control group
novice, or significantly increasing training loads.
may have revealed a protective effect of the ‘10%
There is strong evidence that excessive and rapid
rule’, in line with aforementioned prospective studies.
increases in training load can increase the overall
Reducing Injury Risk
risk of injury in sport (Gabbett, 2016). This is
A number of RCTs investigating general PFP injury
characterised by an increase in the acute:chronic
prevention interventions have been performed with
workload ratio, whereby the total summation of
mixed results. Many of these studies have selected
training time and intensity ‘this week’ is significantly
populations of military recruits, as the control of
more than the average of the past three weeks. Sixty
potentially confounding variables is made easier in
percent of all running injuries can be attributed to
this context. Conflicting results were found between
training errors of ‘too much, too soon’ (Hreljac, 2005).
two large RCTs investigating the efficacy of a general
The idea of ‘too soon’ combined with ‘too much’
lower limb strengthening and stretching programme
appears to be an important relationship. The
on AKP in military recruits. Brushøj et al. (2008)
evidence
proved
randomised participants into an intervention group of
inconclusive in a mixed population of 748 high school
lower limb strengthening and stretching three times
runners
was
per week, while the control group performed upper-
associated with increased risk of RRI (including PFP,
limb strengthening exercises. At 12-week follow up,
and
PFJ stress,
of
‘too
where
much’
higher
a correlation
in
isolation
weekly
mileage
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 27
FEATURE ARTICLE there was found to be no significant difference in the
Davis, 2012), respectively.
incidence of overuse knee injury between groups.
Considering spatiotemporal factors, gait retraining
Contrary to these findings, Coppack, Etherington,
interventions focussed on the sagittal plane have
and Wills (2011) reported a 75% reduction in the risk
also proven effective at increasing cadence, reducing
of AKP in their intervention group. In this study,
step
participants in the intervention group performed a
transitioning towards FFS (Lenhart, Thelen, Wille,
lower limb strength and stretching programme seven
Chumanov, & Heiderscheit, 2014; Roper et al.,
times per week for 14 weeks. It is possible that the
2016). All three of these factors have been shown to
improved outcomes of this group compared with
reduce PFJ stress during running. In a population of
those studied by Brushøj et al. (2008) are a result of
healthy
the higher frequency of exercise, longer duration of
investigated the change in forces on the knee when
the intervention period, as well as an increased
step rate was increased to 110% of preferred step
emphasis on unilateral strengthening exercises.
rate, finding a decrease in PFJ stress of 14%.
Specific
strengthening
Another interesting factor to consider, is the role of
programme targeting hip and core strength showed
footwear on joint forces. Minimalist footwear has
significant improvements in pain and functional ability
been shown to reduce PFJ stress during running, at
in a cohort of female runners already exhibiting
preferred cadence, by 15%, and when combined with
symptoms of PFP (Earl & Hoch, 2011).
a 10% increase in step rate, joint forces were
With regard to interventions aimed at reducing injury
reduced by 29% (Bonacci et al., 2018).
risk factors of PFP other than strength, few studies
As has been previously discussed, poorly managed
have been performed in pain free populations. While
training loads have the potential to contribute to
a gap in the published literature remains, to guide
running injuries regardless of whether the individual
clinical decision making, clinicians must make
exhibits any of the risk factors evaluated above.
sensible extrapolations from interventional studies
Training plans should be carefully planned and
involving participants with PFP.
individualised, with particular attention paid to the
to
Regarding
runners,
the
an
8-week
biomechanical
length
adult
and
improving
runners,
landing
Lenhart
et
strategies,
al.
(2014)
characteristics of
athlete’s training history. While the ‘10% rule’
running, evidence exists to support a link between
provides a useful guide, there is evidence to suggest
increased hip adduction and PFP (Noehren et al.,
novice runners may tolerate higher than 10%
2013). Two strategies exist to address this. Firstly,
increases, at least for a short period of time,
proximal muscle strengthening has been shown to
therefore a strict adherence to the 10% rule may
reduce hip adduction moments during running (Earl
delay progression to full capacity. Contrastingly, for
& Hoch, 2011), secondly, there is limited evidence
athletes with a high chronic training load, consecutive
supporting gait retraining as an effective intervention
10% weekly increases in training load may be
for runners with PFP. Two studies investigated the
excessive, and risk increased injury rates (Gabbett,
efficacy of a two week (four sessions per week) gait
2018).
retraining intervention focussing on frontal plane mechanics,
both
showing
reduced
peak
hip
Potential risk factors for PFP in runners and
adduction and pain levels following intervention,
interventions to address these identified in this
which was sustained at one month (Noehren, Scholz,
review of literature, are summarised in Figure 1,
& Davis, 2011) and three months (Willy, Scholz, &
below. CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 28
FEATURE ARTICLE
RISK FACTORS
INTERVENTION
Hip weakness
Strengthening program
Quadriceps weakness
Gait retraining – frontal plane
↑ Peak hip adduction moment during running
Gait retraining – sagittal plane
↓ Cadence / ↑ Step length
Minimalist footwear
Excessive increase in training load
Training load monitoring – “10% rule” as a guideline
Conclusion Over 100 factors have been investigated as potential risk factors for PFP, making it a confusing area for clinicians to gain a clear understanding of the
literature and where emphasis for intervention should lie (Crossley, van Middelkoop, Barton, & Culvenor, 2019). It is important to consider that across a range of studies showing potential risk factors for PFP, very rarely did 100% of subjects exhibit a particular variable. Careful assessment of training history, strength and objective running evaluation will reveal potential contributing factors unique to the individual and
allow the
implementation
of
interventions
targeting these factors.
Thomas is a physiotherapist working in Dunedin. He works with athletes across a wide range of sports and levels of participation. Thomas has a strong interest in knee injuries, stemming from years of managing his own knee pain. He completed this literature review as part of requirements of the post-graduate Sports Physiotherapy paper at the School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago. CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 29
FEATURE ARTICLE References
Bonacci, J., Hall, M., Fox, A., Saunders, N., Shipsides, T., & Vicenzino, B. (2018). The influence of cadence and shoes on patellofemoral joint kinetics in runners with patellofemoral pain. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 21(6), 574-578. Brushøj, C., Larsen, K., Albrecht-Beste, E., Nielsen, M. B., Løye, F., & Hölmich, P. (2008). Prevention of overuse injuries by a concurrent exercise program in subjects exposed to an increase in training load: A randomized controlled trial of 1020 army recruits. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 36(4), 663670. doi:10.1177/0363546508315469 Buist, I., Bredeweg, S. W., van Mechelen, W., Lemmink, K. A. P. M., Pepping, G.-J., & Diercks, R. L. (2007). No Effect of a Graded Training Program on the Number of Running-Related Injuries in Novice Runners: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 36(1), 33-39. doi:10.1177/0363546507307505 Cesarelli, M., Bifulco, P., & Bracale, M. (2000). Study of the control strategy of the quadriceps muscles in anterior knee pain. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 8(3), 330-341. Ceyssens, L., Vanelderen, R., Barton, C., Malliaras, P., & Dingenen, B. (2019). Biomechanical risk factors associated with running-related injuries: a systematic review. Sports Medicine, 1-21. Chester, R., Smith, T. O., Sweeting, D., Dixon, J., Wood, S., & Song, F. (2008). The relative timing of VMO and VL in the aetiology of anterior knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 9(1), 64. Coppack, R. J., Etherington, J., & Wills, A. K. (2011). The effects of exercise for the prevention of overuse an-
terior knee pain: a randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(5), 940948. Cowan, S. M., Crossley, K. M., & Bennell, K. L. (2009). Altered hip and trunk muscle function in individuals with patellofemoral pain. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(8), 584-588. Crossley, K. M., van Middelkoop, M., Barton, C. J., & Culvenor, A. G. (2019). Rethinking patellofemoral pain: Prevention, management and long-term consequences. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. Dudley, R. I., Pamukoff, D. N., Lynn, S. K., Kersey, R. D., & Noffal, G. J. (2017). A prospective comparison of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics between injured and non-injured collegiate cross country runners. Human Movement Science, 52, 197-202. Dye, S. F. (2005). The pathophysiology of patellofemoral pain: a tissue homeostasis perspective. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 436, 100-110. Earl, J. E., & Hoch, A. Z. (2011). A proximal strengthening program improves pain, function, and biomechanics in women with patellofemoral pain syndrome. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(1), 154163. doi:10.1177/0363546510379967 Ferber, R., Kendall, K. D., & Farr, L. (2011). Changes in knee biomechanics after a hip-abductor strengthening protocol for runners with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Journal of Athletic Training, 46(2), 142149. Finnoff, J. T., Hall, M. M., Kyle, K., Krause, D. A., Lai, J., & Smith, J. (2011). Hip strength and knee pain in high school runners: a prospective study. PM&R, 3(9), 792-801. CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 30
FEATURE ARTICLE Fokkema, T., Hartgens, F., Kluitenberg, B., Verhagen, E., Backx, F. J., van der Worp, H., . . . van Middelkoop, M. (2019). Reasons and predictors of discontinuation of running after a running program for novice runners. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 22(1), 106-111. Francis, P., Whatman, C., Sheerin, K., Hume, P., & Johnson, M. I. (2019). The proportion of lower limb running injuries by gender, anatomical location and specific pathology: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 18(1), 21-31. Gabbett, T. J. (2016). The training—injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), 273-280. Gabbett, T. J. (2018). Debunking the myths about training load, injury and performance: empirical evidence, hot topics and recommendations for practitioners. British Journal of Sports Medicine, bjsports-2018099784. Herbst, K. A., Barber Foss, K. D., Fader, L., Hewett, T. E., Witvrouw, E., Stanfield, D., & Myer, G. D. (2015). Hip strength is greater in athletes who subsequently develop patellofemoral pain. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(11), 2747-2752. Hreljac, A. (2005). Etiology, prevention, and early intervention of overuse injuries in runners: a biomechanical perspective. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics, 16(3), 651-667. Kulmala, J. P., Avela, J., Pasanen, K., & Parkkari, J. (2013). Forefoot strikers exhibit lower running-induced knee loading than rearfoot strikers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 45(12), 2306-2313. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31829efcf7 Lenhart, R. L., Thelen, D. G., Wille, C. M., Chumanov, E. S., & Heiderscheit, B. C. (2014). Increasing running
step rate reduces patellofemoral joint forces. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 46(3), 557 -564. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a78c3a Luedke, L. E., Heiderscheit, B. C., Williams, D. S. B., & Rauh, M. J. (2016). Influence of Step Rate on Shin Injury and Anterior Knee Pain in High School Runners. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 48(7), 1244-1250. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000890 Neal, B. S., Barton, C. J., Gallie, R., O’Halloran, P., & Morrissey, D. (2016). Runners with patellofemoral pain have altered biomechanics which targeted interventions can modify: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Gait and Posture, 45, 69-82. Neal, B. S., Lack, S. D., Lankhorst, N. E., Raye, A., Morrissey, D., & van Middelkoop, M. (2019). Risk factors for patellofemoral pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53 (5), 270-281. Nielsen, R. O., Parner, E. T., Nohr, E. A., Sørensen, H., Lind, M., & Rasmussen, S. (2014). Excessive progression in weekly running distance and risk of running-related injuries: An association which varies according to type of injury. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 44(10), 739-747. doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.5164 Noehren, B., Hamill, J., & Davis, I. (2013). Prospective evidence for a hip etiology in patellofemoral pain. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 45(6), 1120-1124.
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 31
FEATURE ARTICLE Noehren, B., Scholz, J., & Davis, I. (2011). The effect of real-time gait retraining on hip kinematics, pain and function in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(9), 691696. Owings, T. M., & Grabiner, M. D. (2002). Motor control of the vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis muscles is disrupted during eccentric contractions in subjects with patellofemoral pain. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 30(4), 483-487. Powers, C. M., Witvrouw, E., Davis, I. S., & Crossley, K. M. (2017). Evidence-based framework for a pathomechanical model of patellofemoral pain: 2017 patellofemoral pain consensus statement from the 4th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Manchester, UK: part 3. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(24), 1713-1723. Rathleff, M., Rathleff, C., Crossley, K., & Barton, C. (2014). Is hip strength a risk factor for patellofemoral pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(14), 1088-1088. Roper, J. L., Harding, E. M., Doerfler, D., Dexter, J. G., Kravitz, L., Dufek, J. S., & Mermier, C. M. (2016). The effects of gait retraining in runners with patellofemoral pain: A randomized trial. Clinical Biomechanics, 35, 14-22. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.03.010 Schubert, A. G., Kempf, J., & Heiderscheit, B. C. (2014). Influence of stride frequency and length on running mechanics: a systematic review. Sports Health, 6(3), 210-217. Smith, B. E., Selfe, J., Thacker, D., Hendrick, P., Bateman, M., Moffatt, F., . . . Logan, P. (2018). Incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One, 13(1), e0190892.
Sport NZ. (2017). Active NZ, The New Zealand participation survey 2017.
Retrieved from https://
sportnz.org.nz/assets/Uploads/Main-Report.pdf Taunton, J. E., Ryan, M. B., Clement, D. B., McKenzie, D. C., Lloyd-Smith, D. R., & Zumbo, B. D. (2002). A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 36(2), 95-101. doi:10.1136/bjsm.36.2.95 Tenforde, A. S., Sayres, L. C., McCurdy, M. L., Collado, H., Sainani, K. L., & Fredericson, M. (2011). Overuse Injuries in High School Runners: Lifetime Prevalence and Prevention Strategies. PM & R, 3(2), 125131. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.09.009 Thijs, Y., Pattyn, E., Van Tiggelen, D., Rombaut, L., & Witvrouw, E. (2011). Is hip muscle weakness a predisposing factor for patellofemoral pain in female novice runners? A prospective study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(9), 1877-1882. Willson, J. D., & Davis, I. S. (2008). Lower extremity mechanics of females with and without patellofemoral pain across activities with progressively greater task demands. Clinical Biomechanics, 23(2), 203-211. Willson, J. D., Sharpee, R., Meardon, S. A., & Kernozek, T. W. (2014). Effects of step length on patellofemoral joint stress in female runners with and without patellofemoral pain. Clinical Biomechanics, 29(3), 243247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.12.016 Willy, R. W., Scholz, J. P., & Davis, I. S. (2012). Mirror gait retraining for the treatment of patellofemoral pain in female runners. Clinical Biomechanics, 27(10), 1045-1051.
PAGE 32
SPRINZ
Rate of Force Development (RFD) and why physiotherapists should know about it. Chris Juneau, Physiotherapist PT, DPT, SCS, CSCS, Board-Certified Clinical Specialist in Sports Physical Therapy (SCS) Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist (CSCS)
Dry Needling Certified & USA Weightlifting Coach Sports Performance Research Institute NZ, Auckland University of Technology. There is no question that objective data,
Let me explain a bit more about why this is
repeated testing, and functional assessments
potentially
are taking medicine by storm. The concept of
strength.
more
valuable
than
maximal
profiling individualsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; capacity, both at a tissue and compound task level, have become common
If you consider an individual walking down a
processes in justifying progression through a
sidewalk and stumbling over a bump in the
rehabilitation program, to reintegration into activity
pavement, ask yourself what is more important
after injury, or in assessing risk factors in screening
related
avenues. The most commonly utilized testing
preventing a fall:
to
recovering
the
tripped
limb
and
mediums in the Physiotherapy world typically involve either peak force, or maximal strength,
1 - the ability to produce a maximal hip flexion force
(think in terms of a hand held dynamometer or
or
manual muscle test), or multi-joint functional tasks
2 - the ability to produce a hip flexion contraction
(single leg hop testing after anterior cruciate
quickly.
reconstruction or the timed up and go assessment in a fall-risk population). While these tests are
It should get your mind spinning a bit, specifically
certainly valuable, there is an emerging interest in
considering the fact that this person would need at
the concept of force and time, specifically the ability
least enough strength to pull their leg forward, but
to produce force quickly, which seems to better
ultimately, that value is certainly not a maximal
represent the comprehensive capacity of an
effort for most individuals, which brings us to RFD.
individual and better predict performance.
It should make a bit of sense to consider that moving quickly, recovering their leg via a rapid hip
This category of force-time characteristics is often
flexor contraction, will provide a better chance of
called rate of force development (RFD), which
preventing the fall by moving their leg quickly under
simply describes the force produced for a given
them.
period of time. That is the simple concept of RFD. This is valuable CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 33
SPRINZ information when describing risk, or readiness, after
working with AUT to investigate easier and more
injury or in a performance environment, as
practical avenues for collection of this data. The
increases in RFD are also associated with
goal is to provide a cost effective, reliable, testing
improvements in performance in numerous
device that can help provide more information
activities such as sprint speed and weightlifting capacity, along with tasks of daily living, such as
If you would like to read a bit
increases in walking speed or sit to stand activities.
more about RFD here is a really great resource:
Below is a list of how RFD impacts activity: Slawinski J, Bonnefoy A, Leveˆque J, et al.
Maffiuletti
Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of elite and well-
Blazevich A. Rate of force develop-
trained sprinters during sprint start. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(4): 896–905.
N,
Per
Aagaard
P,
ment: physiological and methodological considerations. Eur J Appl
Stone M, Sands W, Carlock J, et al. The importance of isometric maximum strength and peak rate-of-force development in sprint cycling. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(4): 878–884.
strength testing: evaluation of tests of explosive force production. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 91:147– 154
the performance of specific tissues, movements, and tasks. My research question revolves around the use of a load cell, often referred to as a strain gauge, which
Clark D, Manini T, Fielding R, et al. Neuromuscular determinants of maximum walking speed in wellfunctioning older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2013; 48:358–363.
Now, I know what you are thinking, this sounds and most certainly will cost a large
investment, which is not very appealing, and I would certainly sympathize with that. Our current model involves using expensive machines, such as force plates and isokinetic dynamometers, and these
about the capacity of your clients, in an attempt to improve our profiling, and more objectively quantify
Mirkov D, Nedeljkovic A, Milanovic S, et al. Muscle
fancy
Physiol. 2016; 116:1091–1116.
tools
are
fantastic
for
research
and
academics, but not for clinical settings. Well, good news! Part of my time here in New Zealand is
is the big brother to a hand held dynamometer, but significantly more practical and portable than a force plate or isokinetic device, and how it can be used in clinical settings to acquire RFD. First things first, my aim is to assess the reliability
of the tool and the set-up, which is important to make sure we have consistency in the data capture, and eventually compare performance of a healthy group to an unhealthy group. My principle measure is knee extension (quadriceps function) and my unhealthy population will be a cohort of individuals with anterior knee pain. Essentially, I want to look at the RFD differences in both individuals with and without anterior knee pain, but CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 34
SPRINZ also look at differences between the painful and nonpainful limbs in that same cohort. This could start providing more useable, activity relevant, and reliable data for everything from return to sport testing to fall risk assessments. Needless to say, I will need participants when it is time to collect data, if you are interested, please contact me via email and we can set up a time to chat! Cmj027@gmail.com
Chris is a Sports Residency and Sport Performance Trained, Doctor of Physical Therapy from the United State of America, with a unique perspective on strength and conditioning, performance, and sports injury management. Having practiced the last 9 years in outpatient sports orthopedics, Chris has recently left his position with Memorial Hermann Ironman Sports Medicine in Houston, Texas, to pursue a Masters of Philosophy (Rehabilitation Science focus) in Auckland, with AUT SPRINZ. Chris completed his sports training and education with The University of St. Augustine, The Ohio State University, and University of Louisville.
PAGE 35
CLINICAL REVIEW
Paediatric Resistance Training: Benefits, Concerns, and Program Design Considerations. Avery D. Faigenbaum and Gregory D.Myer Current Sports Medicine Reports Vol.9 No.3, pp.161-168, 2010
By Pip Sail A growing number of young athletes are involved in
resistance training program (44,65,67).
resistance training in schools, fitness centre and sports-training facilities(13,61). As more children and
Bone Health
adolescents get involved it is important to establish
Childhood and adolescence may be the opportune
safe and effective guidelines by which resistance
time to for the bone-modelling and remodelling
exercise can improve the health, fitness and sports
process to respond to tensile forces associated with
performance of younger populations.
weight-bearing
The term resistance training refers to a method of
resistance training guidelines are followed along with
conditioning that involves the progressive use of a
proper nutrition, resistance exercise can play a
wide range of resistive loads, different velocities and
critical role in bone mass acquisition during the
a variety of training modalities
paediatric years (73). The mechanical stress from
activities
(3,73).
If
age-specific
this type of training may act synergistically with
Resistance training can offer unique benefits for
growth-related increases in bone mass (3,73).
children when properly supervised and appropriately prescribed:
Sports-Related Injuries
a) enhanced muscle strength/power
Owing to the apparent decline in free time physical
b) enhanced motor skill performance
activities among children and adolescents (57,59), it
c) facilitate weight control
seems that the musculoskeletal system in some
d) increase bone mineral density
young athletes may not be prepared for the demands
e) increase resistance to sports related injury
of sports practice and competition.
f) increase local muscle endurance
Appropriately designed and sensibly progressed
g) improve insulin sensitivity
resistance training programs may help to reduce the
h) improve blood lipid profile
likelihood of sports related injuries in young athletes.
i) enhance attitude toward lifetime physical activity
While there is not one combination of exercises, sets and repetitions that has proven to optimise training
Body Composition
adaptations, these data indicate that multifaceted
Although the treatment of paediatric obesity is
programs that increase muscle strength, enhance
complex, exposure to resistance training along with
movement mechanics and improve functional abilities
counselling and nutrition advice may provide a safe
appear to be the most effective for reducing sports
pathway for obese youth to initiate exercise. Several
related injuries in children.
studies have reported favourable change in body composition in children and adolescents who were obese
following
participation
in
a
progressive
Special Considerations for Training Girls CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 36
CLINICAL REVIEW While musculoskeletal growth and development
Lower back pain has become a significant health
show similar trends between genders, male and
concern among adolescents (37) and a role for
female strength and neuromuscular patterns diverge
preventative
significantly during and after puberty (31). Boys
muscular endurance and low back stability has
naturally
and
become apparent particularly in young lifters. Injuries
coordination that correlates to maturational stages
to the lower back may be in part due to poor program
whereas untrained girls show very little improvement
design,
throughout
Multifaceted
progression of loads and thus if paediatric resistance
training that combine resistance training, plyometric
trains guidelines are not followed there is potential for
training, balance and proprioception have been found
serious injury.
demonstrate
puberty
power,
strength
(31,35,43,62).
intervention
improper
to
enhance
technique
and
strength,
inappropriate
to enhance movement biomechanics and lower limb strength in adolescent girls (49-55). Resistance
Paediatric Resistance Training Guidelines
training combined with growth and development may
A
induce a â&#x20AC;&#x153;neuromuscular spurt "which may improve
administration of safe, effective and enjoyable youth
biomechanics related to injury risk (34,54) and may
resistance training program is understanding training
improve sports performance.
principles and an appreciation the uniqueness of the
prerequisite
physical
and
for
the
psychosocial
development
aspects
of
and
training
Risks and Concerns
children and adolescents.
Current findings indicate a low risk of injury in
There is no minimum age requirement at which
children and adolescents who follow age appropriate
children can begin resistance training but participants
training guidelines (18,24,42)
must be mentally and physically ready to comply with
Potential for injury to the physis or growth plate has
coaching instructions and the stress of an organised
been a primary concern associated with youth
training program.
resistance training. The growth plate
There
can be
does
not
appear
to
be
one
optimal
significantly weaker than the surrounding connective
combination of sets, reps and exercises that will
tissue and therefore less resistance to shear or
promote favourable adaptations in young lifters.
tensile forces (66) and injury to this section of the
Sensible integration of different training and periodic
bone can result in significant discomfort, growth
manipulation of program variable will keep the
disturbance and loss of training hours. However,
training
these injuries are generally caused by improper lifting
Individual effort combined with a well-designed
techniques, poorly designed training programs and
training program will determine the adaptations that
poorly appointed training loads combined with lack of
take place.
effective,
challenging
and
pleasurable.
qualified adult supervision.
There is no evidence to suggest that resistance
When designing resistance training programs for
training will negatively impact growth and maturation
young athletes, it is important to consider the
during childhood and adolescence (18,42).
total
While data to date indicates that injury occurrence in
practice and competition as well as free play,
paediatric resistance training is very low (18,24,42)
physical education and possibly private coaching
professional
sessions.
who
prescribe
resistance
exercise
exercise
dose,
Because
which
of
the
includes
sports
interindividual
should be mindful of the risk associated with this
variability of stress tolerance, each young athlete
type of training, cognisant of safety precautions and
should be treated as an individual. A reduction in
aware of the potential risk for repetitive use soft
sports performance and an increased risk of
tissue injuries.
injury can result if resistance exercises are CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE >>
PAGE 37
CLINICAL REVIEW simply added onto a young athlete's training
Begin resistance training with two sets of 10-15
schedule.
repetitions with a light load to develop proper technique then depending on the individual needs,
Acute Program Design Variables
goals and abilities repetition loads can be progressed
Variables to be considered in designing a paediatric
to include additional sets with heavier loads, for
resistance program:
example 6-10rep max., on large muscle groups to
a) warm-up and cool-down
maximise strength gains. It is important that the
b) selection and order of exercise
number of repetitions allow the lifter to maintain
c) training intensity and volume
movement speed and efficiency for all repetitions
d) rest intervals between sets and exercises
within a set.
e) repetition velocity Research suggests that children and adolescents Warm up procedures should involve the performance
can resist fatigue to a greater extent than adults
of dynamic movement designed to elevate core body
during several repeated sets of resistance exercise
temperature,
,
(19). Thus a short rest interval of about a minute may
improve kinaesthetic awareness and maximise active
suffice in children. This should be decided as long as
range of movement.
technique remains good.
Select
enhance
exercises
that
motor-unit
are
excitability
appropriate
to
the
The cadence
at which resistance exercise is
participant's body size, fitness level, exercises
performed can affect the adaptations to a program.
technique experience and training goals. Resistance
The performance of different training velocities within
training with free weights, medicine balls and body
a program may be the most effective stimulus for
weight will be particularly beneficial for young
young athletes, however as velocity is increased it is
athletes who need to enhance motor skill, balance,
critical to retain correct technical performance of
core strength and muscle power.
each repetition.
Most youth will perform total body workouts several times per week which involve multiple exercises
CONCLUSION
stressing all major muscle groups each session. In
Scientific evidence and clinical impressions indicate
this type of workout large muscle group exercises
that resistance training has the potential offer health
should be performed before smaller muscle group
and fitness value to children and adolescents
exercises and multiple-joint exercises should be
provided that appropriate training guidelines are
performed before single joint exercises.
followed
More challenging exercises should be performed
Comprehensive resistance training programs that
earlier in the workout when the neuromuscular
integrate different elements of physical fitness are the
system is less fatigued
most likely to enhance sports performance and
and
qualified
instruction
is
available.
reduce the risk of injury. Training intensity is one of the most important factors in a resistance training program because it is the major stimulus
related to muscular fitness. To
reduce the risk of injury young lifters need to first learn how to perform the exercise technically with a light load and then gradually progress the intensity or volume without compromising technique.
A full list of references is available on request.
PAGE 38
UPCOMING SEPNZ COURSES
The second half of the year we have successfully completed The Lower Limb in Sport course, Promotion and Prescription of Physical Activity and Exercise Injury Prevention & Performance Enhancement. We have had a great turn out and we are looking forward to bringing you more next year Proposed courses for 2020 (Not limited to) Sideline Management Venue and dates TBC This course is for registered physiotherapists who work with individual athletes, or on the sideline at sports games or events who want to upskill in the areas of pregame preparation, first aid, acute injury assessment and management, and postevent recovery strategies. By the end of the course you will have all the tools you By the end of the course you will have all the tools you need to manage pre-event preparation, post-event recovery and to confidently assess, manage and refer common sporting injuries and wounds. Lower Limb in Sport SAVE THE DATE: 3rd and 4th Oct 2020 SOUTH ISLAND This course is for registered physiotherapists who work with individual athletes or teams in which lower limb injury is common. The focus of the course is on pathomechanics and kinetic chain deficits as they relate to injury prevention and performance, diagnosis and advanced rehabilitation of lower limb conditions. By the end of the course you will understand the pathoaetiology of common lower limb injuries, be able to perform key clinical and functional tests, rehabilitate lower limb injury in a number of sporting contexts including football, running and contact sports, and develop individualised return-to-sport programmes. Injury Prevention & Performance Enhancement. Venue and Dates TBC This course will provide you with the key skills used in the enhancement of sporting performance and prevention of injury. It covers the analysis of physical, biomechanical and technical needs of sport, identifying key factors affecting performance and injury prevention. You will learn how to assess athletes and implement an individualised programme designed to optimise movement efficiency, performance and minimise injury risk. You will learn how to develop a sportâ&#x20AC;&#x201C;â&#x20AC;?specific screening assessment, how to monitor injury rates and target injury prevention strategies within different sporting contexts. APA Sports Physiotherapy Level One Course. SAVE THE DATE: March 21st-22nd, 2020 SEPNZ is excited to have partnered the Sports and Exercise Physiotherapy Australia (SEPA) and the Australian Physiotherapy Association (APA), to bring the APA Sports Physiotherapy Level One course to New Zealand. The course will be taken by highly experienced and world renowned Mark Brown and Maria Constantinou. This course will suit recent graduates looking to expand their sports physiotherapy knowledge and apply their undergraduate knowledge into a sports setting and more experienced Physios wanting to build on existing knowledge and refresh their sports physiotherapy skills. This course can be done in isolation or as part of the pathway towards becoming an APA Titled Physiotherapist Watch this space, more details to come.
PAGE 39
RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS
British Journal of Sports Medicine November 2019; Vol. 53, No. 22 CONSENSUS STATEMENT ORIGINAL ARTICLES It is good to feel better, but better to feel good: whether a patient finds treatment ‘successful’ or not depends on the questions researchers ask (9 May, 2019) Ewa M Roos, Eleanor Boyle, Richard B Frobell, L Stefan Lohmander, Lina Holm Ingelsrud Online multifactorial prevention programme has no effect on the number of running-related injuries: a randomised controlled trial (6 April, 2019) Tryntsje Fokkema, Robert-Jan de Vos, John M van Ochten, Jan A N Verhaar, Irene S Davis, Patrick J E Bindels, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra, Marienke van Middelkoop EDITORIALS Exercise trials for blood pressure control: keeping it REAL (7 June, 2019) SallieAnne Pearson, Nicholas Buckley, Emmanuel Stamatakis
Keep calm and carry on testing: a substantive reanalysis and critique of ‘what is the evidence for and validity of return-to-sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and metaanalysis’ (9 July, 2019) FREE
Imaging with ultrasound in physical therapy: What is the PT’s scope of practice? A competency-based educational model and training recommendations Jackie L Whittaker, Richard Ellis, Paul William Hodges, Cliona OSullivan, Julie Hides, Samuel Fer nandez-Carnero, Jose Luis Arias-Buria, Deydre S Teyhen, Maria J Stokes REVIEWS Knee osteoarthritis risk is increased 4-6 fold after knee injury – a systematic review and meta-analysis (9 May, 2019) FREE Erik Poulsen, Glaucia H Goncalves, Alessio Bricca, Ewa M Roos, Jonas B Thorlund, Carsten B Juhl Hamstring rehabilitation in elite track and field athletes: applying the British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification in clinical practice (12 July, 2019) Ben Macdonald, Stephen McAleer, Shane Kelly, Robin Ch akraverty, Michael Johnston, Noel Pollock
Jacob John Capin, Lynn Snyder-Mackler, May Arna Risberg, Hege Grindem DISCUSSION Should this systematic review and meta-analysis change my practice? Part 1: exploring treatment effect and trustworthiness (8 April, 2019)
Mervyn J Travers, Myles Calder Murphy, James Robert Debenham, Paola Chivers, Max K Bulsara, Matthew K Bagg, Thorvaldur Skulli Palsson, William Gibson Should this systematic review and meta-analysis change my practice? Part 2: exploring the role of the comparator, diversity, risk of bias and confidence (8 April, 2019) Mervyn J Travers, Myles Calder Murphy, James Robert Debenham, Paola Chivers, Max K Bulsara, Matthew K Bagg, Thorvaldur Skulli Palsson, William Gibson
http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/53/23 All articles are accessible via our website https://sportsphysiotherapy.org.nz/members/bjsm/
PAGE 40
CLASSIFIEDS
PAGE 41
COURSE EDUCATORS
EXPRESSION OF INTEREST The SEPNZ Education Committee is calling for expressions of interest for new members to join
the SEPNZ Education Committee. We are looking for people needed for teaching course content or just manpower for decision making If you have a passion for Sports Physiotherapy and an interest in helping our members receive quality robust Sports Physiotherapy education, please send your CV along with a covering letter to: Rebecca Longhurst becsvw@hotmail.com