RPA final TIP 2013-2016 by East Central Intergovernmental Association (ECIA)

RANSPORTATION

MPROVEMENT

ROGRAM

FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS

2013 - 2016

ECIA REGIONAL PLANNING AFFILIATION 8 Final: June 28th 2012 Amended: March 28th, 2013

PREPARED BY

EAST CENTRAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL ASSOCIATION Suite 200, 3999 Pennsylvania Avenue, Dubuque, Iowa 52002 563.556.4166, FAX 563.556.0348

Disclaimer The preparation of this document was financed in part through funds provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration.

CAVEAT The contents of this document reflect information given to ECIA by the various implementing agencies. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 1

Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 4 RPA Membership and Governance ..................................................................................................... 4 RPA Organization and Management .................................................................................................. 5 RPA Policy Board................................................................................................................................... 5 RPA Policy Board:...................................................................................................................... 5 RPA 8 Technical Advisory Committee: ...................................................................................................... 6

RPA Overall Goal................................................................................................................................... 6 Major Projects and Concerns within the RPA Region ........................................................ 6 The SAFETEA-LU ................................................................................................................................. 7 Status of Transportation Improvement Projects programmed in FFY 2012................................ 9 Fund Availability .................................................................................................................................. 20 RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Transportation Projects for FFY 2013 - 2016.......................................................................................................................................... 24 RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Transit Projects for FFY 2013 - 2016 .. 32 RPA 8 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM ........................................................................... 35 Resolution .............................................................................................................................................. 37 Appendix D: General RPA Funding Guide to Transportation Surface Transportation Projects ...................................................................................................................................... 38

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 2

Abbreviations AVL BRP BROS BRS DMATS ECIA ESP FFY FHWA FM FTA GO BONDS HD Bus IBRCP Iowa DOT ITS ISTEA JARC LD Bus LOST LRTP NHS RISE ROW RPA RUTF Sec 3 Sec 18 Sec 16 STA STP STPTE TAC TANF TEA-21 TIP TPWP

Automatic Vehicle Locator Bridge Replacement Program Bridge Replacement Off-System Bridge Replacement On System Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation Study East Central Intergovernmental Association Economic Stimulus Project Federal Fiscal Year Federal Highway Administration Farm-to-Market Federal Transit Administration General Obligation Bonds Heavy Duty Bus Innovative Bridge Research & Construction Program Iowa Department of Transportation Intelligent Transportation Systems Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 Job Access/Reverse Commute Light Duty Bus Local Option Sales Tax Long Range Transportation Plan National Highway System Revitalize Iowa's Sound Economy (IOWA DOT Grant/Loan Program) Right of Way Regional Planning Affiliation Road Use Tax Fund FTA discretionary capital funds FTA operating, capital, and planning funds FTA capital and operating funds for non-profits State Transit Assistance Surface Transportation Program Surface Transportation Program Transportation Enhancement Technical Advisory Committee Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Planning Work Program

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 3

Introduction The Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for the East Central Intergovernmental Association Regional Planning Affiliation (RPA) is a four year listing of federal aid eligible transportation projects selected by the various governmental agencies and by Regional Planning Affiliation (RPA) Policy Board for implementation. All transportation projects in the RPA Region using federal funds are to be included in the TIP. The TIP is prepared annually for the RPA Policy Board with input from the Technical Advisory Committee, Iowa Department of Transportation, and the general public. Prioritization of projects within a project year is determined by the implementing agencies. Prioritization of Long Range Transportation Plan projects on a year-to-year basis will be done by the RPA Policy Board in cooperation with the implementing agency. RPA Membership and Governance The East Central Intergovernmental Association Regional Planning Affiliation (RPA) membership is made up of 56 local cities and counties in a four county area in eastern Iowa. All member jurisdictions have signed a 28E agreement to conduct transportation planning and the programming of federal transportation funds as determined by the Iowa Department of Transportation. The Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation Study (DMATS) area in greater Dubuque is excluded from the RPA because it is a separate transportation planning area. The DMATS region includes the Cities of Dubuque, Asbury, Sageville, Peosta, Centralia and Durango, as well as portions of Dubuque County. The ECIA RPA is staffed by the East Central Intergovernmental Association, which has no formal membership on either the RPA Policy Board or the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). At their request, the Iowa Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are only advisory members of the RPA Policy Board and Tech advisory committee. The 56 member local jurisdictions include four counties and four urban areas (population greater than 5,000). The four urban areas are the Cities of Clinton, DeWitt, Manchester, and Maquoketa. The total members of the ECIA RPA include: CLINTON DELAWARE DUBUQUE JACKSON Clinton County Andover Calamus Camanche Charlotte Clinton Delmar DeWitt Goose Lake Grand Mound Lost Nation Low Moor Toronto Welton Wheatland

Delaware County Colesburg Delaware Delhi Dundee Earlville Edgewood Greeley Hopkinton Manchester Masonville Ryan

Dubuque County Balltown Bankston Bernard Cascade Dyersville Epworth Farley Graf Holy Cross Luxemburg New Vienna Rickardsville Sherrill Worthington Zwingle

Jackson County Andrew Baldwin Bellevue LaMotte Maquoketa Miles Monmouth Preston St. Donatus Sabula Spragueville Springbrook

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 4

RPA Organization and Management The East Central Intergovernmental Association Regional Planning Affiliation was established on February 2, 1994 through the adoption of Articles of Agreement by the participating organizations in the region. It is one of the 18 RPA's in the state that were formed as part of the Iowa Department of Transportation's implementation of Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), particularly in regard to meeting the statewide planning and programming aspects of the legislation. This cooperative, comprehensive, and continuing transportation planning process was established by an agreement between the state and local governments in compliance with the provisions of the ISTEA. The planning process is implemented through a committee structure. Committees forward their recommendations to the Policy Board for consideration and final action. At this time, the only standing committee is the Technical Advisory Committee, which was formed by the Policy Board at its first meeting on February 2, 1994. The Policy Board and Technical Advisory Committee's responsibilities are summarized below: RPA Policy Board The ECIA RPA is governed by a Board of twelve elected officials from the member jurisdictions. The Policy Board is responsible for establishing overall policy, making decisions related to transportation planning and project funding priorities, and monitoring the direction of studies of transportation conditions in the region. There is a Board member from each of the four counties, and a Board member from each of the four large urban areas. The remaining four Board members are from a non-urban city in each of the four counties which are elected by caucus every two years. RPA Policy Board: Clinton County Jon Staszewski (Supervisor) Clinton County

Delaware County Jeff Madlom (Supervisor) Delaware County Dubuque County Daryl Klein (Supervisor) Dubuque County Jackson County Larry â&#x20AC;&#x153;Buckâ&#x20AC;? Koos (Chair) (Supervisor-Jackson County) Ex officio (non-voting members) Mokhtee Ahmad (Admin) FTA Reg. VII (Proxy Mark Betchel)

Mark Vulich City of Clinton Don Thiltgen (Vice Chair) (Mayor, City of DeWitt)

Tom Roth (City Administrator) City of Camanche

Milt Kramer (Mayor) City of Manchester

Margie Horstman Delaware County

Wayne Demmer (Supervisor) RTA

Mick Michel Dubuque County

Don Schwenker (Mayor) City of Maquoketa

Paul Konrardy (Mayor) City of LaMotte

Stu Anderson (Plng. & Prog) Iowa DOT (Proxy Sam Shea)

Lubin Quinones (Admin) FHWA, Iowa Div. (Proxy Tracy Trounter)

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 5

RPA 8 Technical Advisory Committee: The Technical Advisory Committee consists of professional staff persons from the RPA member jurisdictions. The Technical Committee reviews, studies, and makes recommendations to the Policy Board related to technical issues affecting spending and study priorities. COUNTIES Todd Kinney, Chair County Engineer

Anthony Bardgett County Engineer

URBAN AREAS Clinton County Jason Craft City Administrator, Clinton Steve Lindner City Administrator, DeWitt Delaware County Timothy J. Vick City Manager, Manchester Dubuque County

Bret Wilkinson County Engineer

Transit Randy Zobrist Executive Director, River Bend Dennis Hart Director, MTA

Lori McKinley Director,RTA

Jackson County Brian Wagner, Vice Chair City Manager, Maquoketa Ex officio (non-voting members) Mark Bechtel, FTA Reg.VII Tracy Troutner Sham Shea, Iowa DOT Community Planner District Planner, District 6 FHWA Iowa Division Ryan Ward, Transit System Administrator Office of Public Transit, Iowa DOT Clark Schloz County Engineer

RPA Overall Goal The Goal of the ECIA Regional Planning Affiliation is to further develop the transportation system with a vision toward improving safety, promoting economic development and improving the quality of life within the RPA Region with consideration being given to the various levels of political sub-divisions and to alternative forms of transportation such as transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Major Projects and Concerns within the RPA Region 1. Implementation of the U.S. 30/67 Corridor Improvements in the City of Clinton. 2. To improve U.S. 30 to 4 lanes from DeWitt west to Mount Vernon. This entire route is now shown in the stateâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s long range plan as a 4-lane roadway. 3. Mississippi River Trail. Annual Transportation Improvement Program RPA staff, is required to develop a transportation improvement program for the Regional Planning Affiliation 8 (RPA 8) and is further required to provide citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, other affected employee representatives, private RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 6

providers of transportation, and other interested parties with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed program during the process. The TIP is to have a listing of projects that are scheduled to be carried out within a 4-year period of when they were initially adopted into the RPA 8 TIP. The TIP will include a financial explanation of the improvement projects that detail how each will be implemented as well as an indication of what public and private resources can be expected to be made available to complete the transportation improvement. Before the RPA 8 Policy Committee can approve any transportation improvement, it will provide citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, private providers of transportation, and other interested parties with reasonable notice of and an opportunity to comment on the proposed improvement. The TIP Process will include the following steps:  

 



RPA 8 staff will start developing the TIP in month of January following rules and regulations adopted by the Iowa DOT. After the draft TIP is finished, it will be released for a 30-day public review process in April. DMATS staff will inform the public of the draft TIP’s availability by sending notice to the organizations on the RPA 8 public participation process list and by publishing legal notices in local newspapers and ECIA website. Theses notices will be printed 4 -20 days before the scheduled meeting. The public hearing will be held with the RPA 8 Policy Board meeting in April. The meeting will be opened for public input during the process. After the final TIP is finished, it will be released for a 30-day public review process in June. RPA staff will inform the public of the final TIP’s availability by sending notice to the organizations on the RPA 8 public participation process list and by publishing legal notices in local newspapers and ECIA website. Theses notices will be published 4 -20 days before the scheduled meeting. The public hearing will be held with the RPA 8 Policy Board meeting in May. The meeting will be opened for public input during the process.

The SAFETEA-LU President Bush signed the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) bill, which provides funding for highways and transit programs. SAFETEALU builds on the initiatives in the Transportation Equity Act (TEA -21), which was the prior bill authorizing legislation for surface transportation. This act combines the continuation and improvement of TEA-21 programs with additional new initiatives to meet the challenges of improving safety as traffic continues to increase at record levels, protecting and enhancing communities and the natural environment. SAFETEA-LU consolidates the previous sixteen planning factors to be considered in the planning process into seven broad areas:  

Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; Increase safety of the transportation system for the motorized and non-motorized users;

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 7

     

Increase security of the transportation system for the motorized and non-motorized users; Increase the accessibility and mobility options available to people and freight; Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and improve quality of life; Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight; Promote efficient system management and operation; and Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 8

Status of Transportation Improvement Projects programmed in FFY 2012

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 9

Regional Planning Affiliation 8 (FY 2012-2015 Transportation Improvement Program) FY 2012 ( October 1, 2011 to September 30, 2012) TPMS Project # NO Sponsor Location Status Type of work STP Surface Transportation Program 386 RGPL-PA08(PMS)--ST-00 1 Pavement Management and Data Collection RPA 8 Trans Planning 6618 RGPL-PA08(UDS)--ST-00 2 Urban Design Specifications Manual RPA 8 Trans Planning 478 RGPL-PA08(RTP)--ST-00 3 RPA 8 Transportation Planning in RPA 8 area Trans Planning 13145 STP-U-1415()--27-23 4 Clinton Travel Demand Forecast model maintenance Trans Planning 19909 STP-U-1855()--70-23 11TH ST: From 6th Ave to Silver Creek 5 Dewitt Bridge Overlay and storm water improvements 21040 STP-U-1040()--70-23 6 Camanche 9TH AVE: From Hwy 67 to Platt Park Pavement Rehab 21345 STP-U-1040()--70-23 7 Camanche Third St: From 4th Avenue to 13th Avenue Pavement Rehab 16637 STP-S-C023(91)--5E-23 Y60/250th Ave: From 2400' North of 8 Clinton CRD Y60/Main St to Hwy 61 Pavement Rehab 19432 STP-S-C023()--5E-23 Y-44/170th Avenue: From E-63 to City of 9 Clinton CRD Calamus Pavement Rehab 20793 STP-U-4682()--70-28 BURRINGTON RD: From Hwy 13 to Rail 10 Manchester Road Pavement Rehab

Project Status April 26th 2012 Length FHWA # Sec: Township ------------1.05 Miles

Project Funding Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total

Programmed Amounts in 1,000 FY 12

Remarks

FY 13 FY 14 FY 15

$13 $10 $10 $8 $6 $6 $65 $52 $52 $5 $4 $4 $759

--------------

$607

$607 $339 $271 $271 ---$1,401

----$213 $181 $181 --

---------

$956

-- Will be let in FY 2012

$956 --

-$801

---

$391

---

$391 $592

---

Federal Aid

$474

Regional FA

$474

-- Federal Aid -0.61 Miles ---

Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA 4.45 Miles Total Federal Aid Regional FA 5.0 Miles Total Federal Aid Regional FA 0.9 Miles Total

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 10

On going

Got Let in FY 12

Moved to FY 13

TPMS Project # Length Project NO Sponsor Location FHWA # Funding Sec: Township Status Type of work STP Surface Transportation Program 20794 0.64 Miles Total STP-S-C028(70)--5E-28 11 -- Federal Aid Manchester S 5TH ST: From South 5th -Enterprise Ave to Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA Total 21344 STP-U-4742()--70-49 12 S Matteson St: From E Maple St to E Summit Federal Aid Maquoketa Pavement Rehab Regional FA Total 21345 STP-U-4742()--70-49 13 Quarry St: From N 2nd St to N Eliza St Federal Aid Maquoketa Pavement Rehab Regional FA 6.9 Miles Total 20847 STP-()--2C-23 IADOT -- Federal Aid US 67: CO RD E50 TO US 52 14 Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0.1 Miles Total 20852 STP-()--2C-31 IADOT IA 32: 1.3 MI N OF US 20 (NB) -- Federal Aid 15 Grading 20761 16

STP-S-C031()--5E-31

Dubuque CRD

7752 17

Dubuque CRD

3354 Dubuque CRD 21041 Cascade

Maquoketa

FY 12 ---$24 $19 $19 $33 $26 $26 $2,307 $1,846 -$51 $51

---$306 $245 $245 $408 $326 $326 ------

$696 $213 $213 ------------

---------------

---- $2,400

---

-- Federal Aid

-- $2,000

Pavement Rehab

-- Regional FA

-- $2,000

STP-S-C031(60)--5E-31 D-15/Petersburg Rd: From Delaware Co. Line to New Vienna City Limits Pavement rehab, widen STP-S-C031(355)--5E-31 D-41/Monastery Road (D41): From Sundown Pavement Rehab

0.9 Miles Total

Remarks

FY 13 FY 14 FY 15

Y 13: From City of Farley to Hawkins

STP-U-1147()--70-31 1ST AVE : From Monore St to Fox St

13144

-- Regional FA 5.46 Miles Total

Programmed Amounts in 1,000

On going

Got Let in FY 12

$700

$560

-- Regional FA 3.8 Miles Total -- Federal Aid

---- $1,500 -- $1,200

$560 ---

----

-- Regional FA

-- $1,200

-- Federal Aid

1.58 Miles Total -- Federal Aid

$1,019 $205

---

$205

Pavement Rehab

-- Regional FA

STP-U-4742()--27-49

-- Total

Travel Demand Forecast model maintenance

-- Federal Aid

Trans Planning

-- Regional FA

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 11

Has been let

On going

TPMS Project # NO Sponsor Location Status Type of work STP Surface Transportation Program 11741 STP-U-4742(IA64)--70-49 Maquoketa MAIN ST: MAIN ST TEAP Study 21 Replace Traffic Signals 20482 STP-S-C049(53)--5E-49 22 Jackson CRD D53: Over Unnamed Creek Bridge Replacement National Highway Sytem 14726 HDP-67(LBTYSQ)--6B-23 US 30: S 14TH ST TO S 4TH ST In Clinton 23 IADOT Stage 2 (LIBERTY SQ) Grade and Pave, Right of Way 20848 NHS-()--11-23 24 IADOT US 30: DE WITT TO CLINTON Pavement Widening 20853 STPN-61()--2J-31 25 IADOT US 61: North of Zwingle at 2 Locations Grading 20854 STPN-61()--2J-49 26 IADOT US 61: 7.2 MI S of Zwingle Grading Primary Road Fund 501 NHSN-30-9(71)--2R-23 27 IADOT US 30/US 30 : MISSISSIPPI R BRIDGE Bridge painting 16977 NHSN-67()--2R-23 US 67: In Clinton From US 30 to IA 136IADOT 28 State Share Pavement Rehab 481 STPN-136-1()--2J-23 29 IADOT IA 136 : MISSISSIPPI R BRIDGE Bridge painting 498 BRFN-52-0()--39-49 30 IADOT US 52/US 52 : Mississippi River at Sabula Bridge rehablitation & washing

Length FHWA # Sec: Township -------

Project Funding Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA

Programmed Amounts in 1,000 FY 12

Remarks

FY 13 FY 14 FY 15

$25 $20 $20 $600 $480 $480

-------

--Moved to FY 14 ---- Will be let in FY 12 --

-- Total

$9,977

-- Federal Aid

$7,982

-----------

Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA

-$2,800 --$402 --$307 ---

-----------

-20860 -2.8 Miles

Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total

$20 --$814

$20 ----

-$25 --$20 ---

-$375 --$20 ---

-- Federal Aid --21055 --29940 --

Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Got Let in FY 12

Will be let in FY 12

--$25 $2,025 ----$20 $1,520 -----

Page 12

Got Let in FY 12

TPMS NO Sponsor Status 31

Project # Length Project Location FHWA # Funding Sec: Township Type of work -- Total STPN-136-1()--2J-23 US 151: Branch Prairie Creek 8.4Miles North 24100 Federal Aid fC d Bridge deck overlay -- Regional FA

18551 IADOT

$51

STPN-32()--2J-31

-- Total

IADOT

IA 32: 1.3 MI N OF US 20 (NB)

-- Federal Aid

Grading

-- Regional FA

STPN-52()--2J-49 US 52: MISSISSIPPI RIVER OVERFLOW INSABULA Right of Way

-- Total

$20

-- Federal Aid

-- Regional FA

20849

STPN-20()--2J-28

-- Total

$395

IADOT

US 20: CC RR 0.9 MI E OF IA 13 (EB)

602000 Federal Aid

IADOT

Bridge deck overlay

-- Regional FA

20850

STPN-20()--2J-28

-- Total

$395

IADOT

US 20: CC RR 0.9 MI E OF IA 13 (WB)

602005 Federal Aid

$200 $160 $160 $239 $191 191 $99 $79 79 $313 $250 $250 $207

--------------

-- Federal Aid

$166

-- Regional FA

$166

Bridge deck overlay

-- Regional FA

STP-E-1040()--8V-23 9th St: From 19th Ave to US 67 ped/bike paving STP-E-1147()--8V-31 1 ST Ave: From Monroe Street to Nixon Street ped/bike grade & pave STP-E-1147()--8V-31 Liberty Ave: From 24th Place to South 14th ped/bike grade & pave STP-E-2160()--8V-31 3rd Ave SE: From 5th St SW to 1st St SW ped/bike grade & pave STP-E-2405(602)--8V-31 East Gate Walkway: From West of Bierman Rd to North of Jacoby Dr East ped/bike paving

--------------

Remarks

FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 -$314 -------

20852

20855 29

Programmed Amounts in 1,000

Got Let in FY 12

Enhancement 32

21129 Camanche

21112 Cascade

21130 Clinton

21113 Dyersville 17030

Epworth

Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Moved to FY 13

Will be let in FY 12

Page 13

Has been let

TPMS NO Sponsor Status Earmarks

Project # Location Type of work 19935

TCSP-1415(614)--9S-23 19TH AVE N: From N 2nd St to Mill Creek 37 Clinton Park Way Grade and Pave Highway Safety Improvement Program 21234 HSIP-()--2H-23 US 61: S. JCT. US 30 NORTH TO 0.5 MI.S. 38 IADOT OF CO. RD. Y-68 Grade and Pave 20848 HSIP-30()--2H-23 39 IADOT US 30: DE WITT TO CLINTON Pavement Widening Illustrative 18705 40

Camanche 21031

DeWitt 21099

Clinton

Safe Routes to School 21085 39 CSD

16650 Clinton CRD

4726 Delaware CRD

Length FHWA # Sec: Township

Project Funding

1.27 Miles Total

Programmed Amounts in 1,000 FY 12 $556

$445

-- Total

$724

-- Federal Aid

$652

-$4,900 $4,410 --

-----

-- Federal Aid -- Regional FA

-----

Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA

Remarks

FY 13 FY 14 FY 15

Moved to FY 13

Got Let in FY 12

ILL-1040()--93-23

2.61 Miles Total

-- $4,960

WASHINGTON BLVD: From Hwy 67 to Hwy Work not Assigned ILL-1855()--93-23 S 6TH AVE: From 4th St to Union Pacific RR tracks Pave ILL-1415()--93-23 44th Ave S/44th Ave South: From Union Specific Rail rd main line N 0 MI to Drop/Pole yard in Lincoln way rail park Work not Assigned

-- Federal Aid -- Regional FA 0.28 Miles Total

------ $1,800

----

-- Federal Aid

-- Regional FA -- Total

---- $3,200

---

-- Federal Aid

-- Regional FA

$5 $5 ----$475 $380 --

----------

---$315 $252 -----

SRTS-U-1415(621)--8U-23 Walking School bus: Clinton CSD Transportation Planning BRS-C023(88)--60-23 Y54/230th Ave: Over creek Bridge Replacement BROS-C028(76)--8J-28 218th Street: From ECL Earlville to Hwy 20 Bridge Replacement

-0 -0.1 Miles 123610

Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA 0.25 Miles Total 141640 Federal Aid -- Regional FA

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

-Has been let --------- Will be let in FY 2012 --

Page 14

TPMS NO Sponsor Status Highway Bridge Program 4696 42

Delaware CRD

20490 Jackson CRD

20486 Jackson CRD

Project # Location Type of work BROS-C028(77)--8J-28 190th Avenue: From 165th Street to Honey Creek Drive Bridge Replacement BROS-C049()--5F-49 30 AVE: Over S Fork Maq River Bridge Replacement BROS-C049()--5F-49 35 ST: Over prairie Creek Bridge Replacement

Length FHWA # Sec: Township

Project Funding

0.2 Miles Total 141690 Federal Aid -0.25 Miles 193240 -0.25 Miles 192330 --

Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Programmed Amounts in 1,000 FY 12

Remarks

FY 13 FY 14 FY 15

$570

$456

--------

-$900 $720 -----

--------

----$500 $400 --

Page 15

Has been let

RPA 8 Final FY 2012-2015 Transportation Improvement Program Map TPMS NUMBERS ON MAP CORRESPOND WITH TPMS NUMBERS ON SPREADSHEET Prepared by ECIA 06-23-11 The preparation of this map was financed in part through federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and/or Federal Transit Administration.

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 16

Regional Planning Affiliation 8 (FY 2012-2015 Transportation Improvement Program) FY 2011 ( October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011) Type of Federal Funds Expenditure NO Description Sponsor : Type of Project TPMS ID ECIA 1

Sec 5311 & 5314 Planning RPA : 1424

Misc

Sec 5309 RTA : 1412 Sec 5309 RTA : 1413 Sec 5309 RTA : 1414 Sec 5309 RTA : 1416 Sec 5309 RTA : 1421 Sec 5309 RTA : 1422 Sec 5309 RTA : 1833 Sec 5309 RTA : 1417 Sec 5309 RTA : 1834 Sec 5309 RTA : 1835 Sec 5311 RTA : 1408 Sec 5316 RTA : 1409 Sec 5317 RTA : 1410 Sec 5317 RTA : 1411

Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Expansion Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Operating Misc Operating Expansion Operating Misc Operating Misc

RPA Planning/Coordination

Transit Project Funding

Project Status April 26th 2012 Programmed Amounts Remarks FY 12

FY 13

FY 14

FY 15

Total

$30,183

Federal Aid

$24,146

RTA 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:094 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:649 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:469 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:595 Bus Maintenance Equipment Radio Tower Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:253 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:253 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:102 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:384 General Opertations JARC Operations New Freedoms - project continuation New Freedoms - project expansion

Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

$74,000 ---$61,420 ---$74,000 ---$61,420 ----$76,220 ---$63,263 ---$76,220 ---$63,263 ---$37,500 ---$30,000 ---$6,500 ---$5,200 ----$78,507 ---$65,161 ---$78,507 ---$65,161 ----$80,862 ---$67,116 ---$80,862 ---$67,116 $1,349,704 $1,349,704 $1,349,704 $1,349,704 $185,704 $185,704 $185,704 $185,704

424,488

439,745

454,722

470,638

$150,000 $225,450 $171,698 $24,000 $12,000

$155,250 $233,340 $177,707 $24,000 $12,000

$160,684 $241,507 $183,927 $24,000 $12,000

$166,308 $249,961 $190,365 $24,000 $12,000

Page 17

got approved got approved

On going On going On going On going

Federal Funds NO

Sponsor : TPMS ID MTA Sec 5309 16 MTA : 1394 Sec 5309 17 MTA : 1395 Sec 5309 18 MTA : 1396 Sec 5309 19 MTA : 1397 Sec 5309 20 MTA : 1399 Sec 5309 21 MTA : 1392 Sec 5309 22 MTA : 1393 Sec 5309 23 MTA : 1398 Sec 5309 24 MTA : 1401 Sec 5309 25 MTA : 1404 Sec 5309 26 MTA : 1405 Sec 5309 27 MTA : 1407 Sec 5309 28 MTA : 1406 Sec 5309 29 MTA : 1400 Sec 5311 30 MTA : 1391 Sec 5309 31 MTA : 1402

Type of Expenditure

Description

Type of Project Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Expansion Capital Replacement Capital Expansion Capital Replacement Operating Misc Capital Replacement

Heavy Duty Bus (30-34 ft.). Deisel, UFRC, VSS, Low Floor. ID: 9744 Heavy Duty Bus (30-34 ft.). Deisel, UFRC, VSS, Low Floor. ID: 473 Light Duty Bus (176" wb). Deisel, UFRC, VSS. ID: 9851 Light Duty Bus (176" wb). Deisel, UFRC, VSS. ID: 00-51 Light Duty Bus (158" wb). Deisel, UFRC, VSS. ID: 0150 Heavy Duty Bus (30-34 ft.). Deisel, UFRC, VSS, Low Floor. ID: 9743 Heavy Duty Bus (30-34 ft.). Deisel, UFRC, VSS, Low Floor. ID: 471 Light Duty Bus (158" wb). Deisel, UFRC, VSS. ID: 563 One non-ADA standard minivan One service truck Diesel 4x4 GPS Technology/AVL Locator Dispatching software Vehicle hoist / Equipment Light Duty Bus (158" wb). Deisel, UFRC, VSS. ID: 564 General Opertations Light Duty Bus (176" wb). Deisel, UFRC, VSS, Low Floor. ID: 0640

Project Funding

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Programmed Amounts Remarks FY 12

FY 13

FY 14

$367,000 $304,610 $367,000 $304,610 $93,000 $77,190 $93,000 $77,190 $88,000 $73,040 ------------------$831,142 $415,571 $93,000 $77,190

----------$378,010 $313,748 $378,010 $313,748 $90,640 $75,231 $29,870 $23,896 $42,848 $34,278 $260,000 $208,000 $75,000 $60,000 ----$831,142 $415,571 ---

------------------------$41,200 $32,960 $93,359 $77,488 $831,142 $415,571 ---

FY 15 ----------------------------$0 $0 ---

Page 18

got approved got approved got approved got approved

On going got approved

Operations & Maintenance (O&M) The result of major oversight nationally has lead to the requirement to include operations and maintenance/management costs of all federal-aid system routes and transit facilities in the STIPs, TIPs, and LRTPs. The Iowa FHWA asked MPOs and RPAs in Iowa to report O&M costs as system-wide totals for operations and maintenance (highways) and operations and maintenance (transit facilities).* This would encompass all the federal aid system routes, transit facilities, and the local systems for your jurisdictions. A majority of the local O&M revenue data should be available from the road use tax finance reports that cities and counties submit to the Iowa DOT. RPA 8 Members Federal aid Revenue & Spending Miles 2013 2014 2015

2016

Clinton County (revenue for each year $5,382,185) Operations $782,857 $814,171 $846,738 $880,607 1,008 Maintenance $1,261,046 $1,311,488 $1,363,947 $1,418,505 City of Clinton (revenue for each year $7,649,478) Operations $153,480 $159,619 $166,004 $172,644 157 Maintenance $633,269 $658,600 $684,944 $712,342 City of DeWitt (revenue for each year $4,862,764) Operations $18,375 $19,110 $19,875 $20,670 36 Maintenance $76,823 $79,896 $83,092 $86,415 Delaware County (revenue for each year $6,019,536) Operations $594,997 $618,797 $643,549 $669,290 908 Maintenance $1,278,916 $1,330,073 $1,383,276 $1,438,607 City of Manchester (revenue for each year $2,250,055) Operations $48,774 $50,725 $52,754 $54,864 34 Maintenance $144,305 $150,077 $156,080 $162,323 Dubuque County (revenue for each year $9,808,557) Operations $1,183,478 $1,230,817 $1,280,050 $1,331,252 723 Maintenance $1,753,960 $1,824,119 $1,897,084 $1,972,967 Jackson County (revenue for each year $4,466,905) Operations $804,683 $836,871 $870,346 $905,159 829 Maintenance $1,055,270 $1,097,480 $1,141,380 $1,187,035 City of Maquoketa (revenue for each year $1,734,930) Operations $43,685 $45,432 $47,249 $49,139 36 Maintenance $96,481 $100,340 $104,354 $108,528 RPA 8 (revenue for each year $42,174,410) Operations $3,630,329 $3,775,542 $3,926,564 $4,083,626 3,730 Maintenance $6,300,070 $6,552,073 $6,814,156 $7,086,722 Process Explanation: The 2011 Revenue, Operations and Maintenance numbers are provided by IADOT for each county and City Staff used 4% inflation for each year for spending and projected the 2011 numbers to 2016 Staff used 0% inflation for revenue and projected the 2011 numbers to 2016 RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 19

Fund Availability Iowa STP Program Adopted STP Fund Distribution System At the October 19, 1999 meeting, the RPA Policy Board adopted a distribution system for uncommitted STP funds. In this system, the funds are distributed by a sub-allocation process. Each jurisdictionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s share of the funds will be determined by the Census population. The cities of Clinton, Manchester, Maquoketa and Dewitt will receive a share based on the population within the incorporated limits of the city. The four counties will each receive a share based on the population of the unincorporated area plus the population of all cities in the county under 5,000 population. Jurisdictions eligible for STP funds that do not receive a sub-allocation will have the opportunity to request funding from the county as follows: 1. Cities below 5,000 population, transit agencies, and the Iowa DOT can compete each year through an application process for 10% of the STP funds set aside by RPA Policy board (Appendix D). 2. Transit agencies providing service within cities greater than 5,000 in population and the Iowa DOT can request funds from the cities over 5,000 population. Based on this distribution system, the eight eligible jurisdictions would receive the following shares of uncommitted STP funds: 2010 Census Population Suballoc Share Multiplier Sub Allocations Before taking Funds from top

FFY2013

Anticipated FFY2014 Target(2)

Anticipated FFY2015 Target(2)

Anticipated FFY2016 Target(2)

$2,573,024

$2,573,000

-$10,348 -$52,300

Pavement Management Program RPA Planning by ECIA Staff Statewide Urban Design Specification (SUDAS) Retroreflecto Meters (7)($12,000 each) Small cities

-$6,366

-$250,401

-$250,399

Sub allocation amount

$2,253,609

$2,253,587

$361,900 $269,354 $397,386 $293,368 $575,415 $113,906 $110,845 $131,435

$361,897 $269,352 $397,382 $293,366 $575,409 $113,905 $110,844 $131,433

Clinton County Delaware County Dubuque County Jackson County City of Clinton City of DeWitt City of Manchester City of Maquoketa

16,909 12,585 18,567 13,707 26,885 5,322 5,179 6,141

Total Population In RPA 8

105,295

16.06% 11.95% 17.63% 13.02% 25.53% 5.05% 4.92% 5.83%

(1) FFY2013-2016 targets are based on the new regional area boundary and population for purposes of determining suballocated amounts. Updated on 04/26/2012 by Chandra Ravada, ECIA

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 20

All project cost are developed using year of expenditure dollars. The RPA 8 members use 4% inflation rate provide by Iowa DOT to come up with year of expenditure costs. UnProgrammed Balance FY 2012 Q2* $9,062,854 2012 $1,921,165 $7,141,689 2013 $1,921,165 $7,141,689 2014 $2,573,024 $4,891,253 $4,823,460 2015 $2,573,000 $1,009,706 $6,386,754 2016 $2,573,000 $716,706 $8,243,048 *Balance has been adjusted based on project changes occurring since the most recent Qrtly report Federal Fiscal Year

STP Target

Target Programmed

Projects Programmed in TIP & STIP FFY2013 FFY2014

FFY2015 FFY2016 ECIA Pavement Mgmt $10,340 $10,340 $10,340 $10,340 SUDAS $6,366 $6,366 $6,366 $6,366 RPA Planning $52,300 Clinton Travel Demand Model $4,000 Maquoketa Travel Demand Model $1,500 Clinton County Y-44/170th Avenue: From E-63 to City of Calamus $390,636 Dubuque County Y13 City of Farley to City of Cascade (sholuders) $800,000 Y13 City of Farley to City of Cascade $2,000,000 D15 /Petersburg Rd $560,000 D41 Monestary Rd $200,000 Delaware County C-64/155TH ST: From Greeley to Petersburg $600,000 City of Manchester S 5TH ST: From South 5th -Enterprise Ave to Grant $213,000 Street BURRINGTON RD: From Hwy 13 to Rail Road $474,000 City of Maquoketa S Matteson $298,509 Quarry $352,000 Main Street TEAP Study $20,000 Small City Projects $271,032 9th AVE: HWY 67 to Platt st Third St: From 4th Avenue to 13th Avenue $170,800 9th AVE: From Anamos rd to HWY 67 $100,000 RTA Security Cameras $59,770 Total $4,891,253 $1,009,706 $716,706 $16,706 Note: The Local STP balance numbers will not match with overall program funds numbers as STP projects from IADOT will not be consider in RPA 8 STP funds. Note: There are few project programmed for FY 15 and 16 as local entities are accumulating STP funds to do a major project in future years.

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 21

Transportation Enhancement (TE) Program At the October 19, 1999 meeting, the RPA Policy Board adopted a procedure for the funding of the RPAâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s TE funds. In this system, funds are to be awarded by a competitive process. The ECIA staff distributes a letter of solicitation to all RPA member governments and County Conservation Boards. Applications are then mailed to the entities. ECIA staff performs the initial scoring based on criteria, which is then reviewed by the RPA Technical Advisory Committee (Appendix D). The Technical Advisory Committee then makes their recommendations to the RPA Policy Board. The Policy Board then holds a public hearing in which comments from the public are heard concerning the applications. After the public hearing, the Policy Board then awards funds to the projects they deem to be most worthy. ECIA programs these funds for the four-year period of the TIP based upon funding targets from the Iowa DOT and projected funding levels. Applications are limited in amount by a minimum funding request of $50,000 and a maximum of $250,000. RPA 8 is going through application process for FY 14 & 15. Un- Programmed Balance FY 2012 Q2* $855,533 2012 $250,000 $605,533 2013 $206,352 $429,752 $382,133 2014 $206,000 $0 $588,133 2015 $206,000 $0 $794,133 2016 $206,000 $0 $1,000,133 *Balance has been adjusted based on project changes occurring since the most recent Qrtly report Federal Fiscal Year

Enhancement

Target Programmed

Projects Programmed in TIP & STIP FFY2013 FFY2014 1ST Ave Trail Project $190,718 9th St Trail Project $160,010 Liberty-Lincolnway Mississippi river Trail $79,024 Connection Total $429,752 $0

FFY2015

FFY2016

Overall Program Funding The tables below provide the program of funds by year in each funding category. Funding Programs

FY 13 Total Fed Aid

Programmed Amounts in 1,000 FY 14 FY 15 Total Fed Aid Total Fed Aid

Surface Transportation Program $11,697 $9,211 $1,692 $1,009 $2,228 $716 Primary Road Fund $1,141 -$40 -$2,830 -National Highway System $6,100 $4,880 $2,500 -$17,500 $14,000 Earmarks $2,900 Highway Saftey Improvement Program $7,700 $6,930 Highway Bridge Program $1,785 $1,412 $520 $400 $3,540 $400 Enhancement $538 $430 ----Total $31,861 $22,863 $4,752 $1,409 $26,098 $15,116

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

FY 16 Total Fed Aid

$21 $270 ---

$16

$34,639 $27,711 --$34,930 $27,727

Page 22

Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program The Federal Bridge Replacement (BR) program is divided among three different governmental levels in the State of Iowa: the State, counties, and cities. About 42% of the funds go to State bridges, another 47% to the 99 counties, and the remaining 11% are distributed to cities. County Bridge Program County bridges are eligible for the BR program based on their service level. For bridge replacement, a bridge must have a Federal Bridge Sufficiency rating (FBS) less than 50 , an average daily traffic (ADT) of 25 or more vehicles, and be rated as structurally deficient (SD) or functionally obsolete (FO). For bridge rehabilitation, a bridge must have an FBS of only 80 or less, an ADT of 25 or more vehicles, and be rated as SD or FO. Counties BR funds are distributed to the counties based on one-third of the Road Use Tax (RUT) distribution and two-thirds on the amount of qualifying square feet of bridges. As funds permit, the Iowa DOT allows counties to borrow up to six years of their average annual allocation. Clinton, Delaware, Dubuque and Jackson Counties in RPA 8 uses many factors when determining which bridges to replace and which bridge replacements to use federal bridge funds. Taken into account is our bridge inspection/condition/life data, traffic counts, knowledge of our systems traffic flow, road repair schedules, school bus routes, etc. We choose bridge projects that have the greatest need (which somewhat correlates with their estimated remaining life). We program projects based on the HBP funds available to us from the state (DOT) provided targets. Currently Dubuque County has a very large project in the 5-year plan that will require a higher dollar amount than our bridge funds are allowed to accumulate. City Bridge Program The City Bridge program does not automatically distribute bridge funds to cities. Rather the funds are distributed based on a combination of several factors including Sufficiency Rating, Average Daily Traffic (ADT), Detour considerations, and Bridge Posting. All applications for city bridge fund projects are ranked by a scoring system statewide. Cities should apply for this funding to get their bridge projects ranked and funded.

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 23

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Transportation Projects for FFY 2013 - 2016

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 24

Regional Planning Affiliation 8 (FY 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program) FY 2013 ( October 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013) TPMS Project # NO Sponsor Location Status Type of work STP Surface Transportation Program 386 RGPL-PA08(PMS)--ST-00 1 RPA 8 Pavement Management and Data Collection Trans Planning 6618 RGPL-PA08(UDS)--ST-00 2 RPA 8 Urban Design Specifications Manual Trans Planning 478 RGPL-PA08(RTP)--ST-00 3 RPA 8 Transportation Planning in RPA 8 area Trans Planning 21040 STP-U-1040()--70-23 4 Camanche 9TH AVE: From Hwy 67 to Platt Park Pavement Rehab 21346 STP-U-1040()--70-23 5 Camanche Third St: From 4th Avenue to 13th Avenue Pavement Rehab 19432 STP-S-C023(93)--5E-23 6

RPA 8

Y-44/170th Avenue: From E-63 to U.S.30

18957

CIP recycling with HMA overlay STP-U-4682()--70-28 BURRINGTON RD: From Hwy 13 to Rail Road Pavement Rehab STP-S-C028(70)--5E-28 S 5TH ST: From South 5th -Enterprise Ave to Pavement Rehab STP-S-C028()--5E-28

Delaware CRD

C-64/155TH ST: From Greeley to Petersburg

20793 7

Manchester

20794 Manchester

Pavement Rehab STP-S-C031()--5E-31

20761 10

Dubuque CRD

Final Amended March 28th 2013 Length FHWA # Sec: Township

Project Funding

---------0.61 Miles ---

Programmed Amounts in 1,000 FY 13

Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA -- Total

$13 $10 $10 $8 $6 $6 $72 $52 $52 $339 $271 $271 $203 $171 $171 $1,300

-- Federal Aid

$13 $10 $10 $8 $6 $6 -----------

$391

$391 $592

---

Federal Aid

$474

Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total

$474 -----

--$696 -$213 -$213 --- $2,000

------

-- Regional FA 0.9 Miles Total

0.64 Miles --7.1 Miles

Remarks

FY 14 FY 15 FY 16

-- Federal Aid -- Regional FA 5.46 Miles Total

$600

-$2,400

---

$600 --

---

Y 13: From City of Farley to Hawkins

-- Federal Aid

$2,000

Pavement Rehab

-- Regional FA

$2,000

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 25

TPMS

Project #

NO Sponsor Location Status Type of work STP Surface Transportation Program

RPA 8

Buy Seven Retroreflecto meters to create data base for sign reflectivity in RPA 8

-- Federal Aid

$67

Trans Planning

-- Regional FA

$67

$700

$560

-$1,000

$560 --

---

-- Federal Aid

$800

-- Regional FA

$800

$250

-- Federal Aid

$200

Pavement Rehab

-- Regional FA

$200

STP-U-4742(IA64)--70-49 MAIN ST: MAIN ST TEAP Study Replace Traffic Signals STP-U-4742()--70-49 Quarry St: From N 2nd St to N Olive St Pavement Rehab & Engineering

-------

---$408 $326 $326

$25 $20 $20 ----

-------

STP-U-4742(617)--70-49

-- Total

$306

S Matteson St: From E Maple St to E Summit S

-- Federal Aid

$245

Pavement Rehab & Engineering

-- Regional FA

$245

STP-()--2C-23 US 30: W OF 158TH AVE (E OF WHEATLAND) TO N JCT US 61 (STATE SHARE) Pavement Rehab

-- Total

$4,400

-- Federal Aid

$3,520

Dubuque CRD

11741 Maquoketa

21345 Maquoketa 21344 Maquoketa 21986 IADOT

STP-S-C031(60)--5E-31 D-15/Petersburg Rd: From Delaware Co. Line to New Vienna City Limits Pavement rehab, widen STP-S-C031(63)--5E-31 Y-13/FARLEY RD: From City of Farley to City of Cascade Granular Shoulders

0.9 Miles Total

STP-S-C031(355)--5E-31

3.8 Miles Total

D41/MONASTERY RD: From Sundown Road to US 151

-- Federal Aid -- Regional FA 3.8 Miles Total

Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA

-- Regional FA

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Remarks

FY 14 FY 15 FY 16

$84

FY 13

-- Total

3354

Programmed Amounts in 1,000

STP-U-PA08()--70-31

14415 13

Project Funding

FHWA # Sec: Township

22112

7752 12

Length

Page 26

TPMS NO Sponsor Status

Project #

Length

Location

FHWA #

Type of work

Sec: Township

Project Funding

Programmed Amounts in 1,000 FY 13

Remarks

FY 14 FY 15 FY 16

STP Surface Transportation Program 19

21989

STP-()--2C-31

-- Total

IADOT

US 52: BOY SCOUT RD TO LUXEMBURG

-- Federal Aid

Pavement Rehab

-- Regional FA

RTA

City of Clinton

Calamus

Dyersville

Primary Road Fund 21990 21

IADOT

21991 22

IADOT

501 IADOT

$1,000

$800

-- Total

$75

Security Cameras for Rta Buses

-- Federal Aid

$60

Security

-- Regional FA

-- Total

-- $2,400

19th Ave North Phase III: from Approx. 1100' West of Randall Ct. to N. 2nd Street In Clinton

-- Federal Aid

-- $1,150

Construction

-- Regional FA

-- $1,150

-- Total

$39

Y44: Hwy 30 Davenport St to Calamus Corporate line.

-- Federal Aid

$31

Resurfacing and Rehabilitation

-- Regional FA

$31

-- Total

$350

-- Federal Aid

$264

-- Regional FA

$264

$170

-$180

---

-$20 ---

-$270 ---

X49 and 1st Avenue West Intersection Improvements Reconstruction BRFN-()--39-31 IA136: JEFFERSON ST TO NCL IN NEW VIENNA Pavement Rehab BRFN-()--39-31 IA 136: 1ST AVE INTERSECTION INCASCADE (STATE SHARE) Pavement Rehab NHSN-30-9(71)--2R-23 US 30/US 30 : MISSISSIPPI R BRIDGE Bridge painting

-- Total -- Federal Aid -- Regional FA -- Total -- Federal Aid --20860 --

Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 27

TPMS NO Sponsor Status Primary Road Fund 481 IADOT 24 18551 25

IADOT

20849 IADOT

20850 IADOT

National Highway System 21987 28 IADOT 21988 29

IADOT

Project # Location Type of work STPN-136-1()--2J-23 IA 136 : MISSISSIPPI R BRIDGE

Length FHWA # Sec: Township

Project Funding

-- Total 21055 Federal Aid

Bridge painting

-- Regional FA

STPN-136-1()--2J-23 US 151: Branch Prairie Creek 8.4Miles North of Cascade Bridge deck overlay STPN-20()--2J-28 US 20: CC RR 0.9 MI E OF IA 13 (EB) Bridge deck overlay STPN-20()--2J-28 US 20: CC RR 0.9 MI E OF IA 13 (WB) Bridge deck overlay

-- Total 24100 Federal Aid --602000 --602005 --

Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA

NHS-()--11-28 US 20: IA 38 TO FARLEY (WB) Pavement Rehab NHS-()--11-28 US 20: DYERSVILLE INTERCHANGE AT CO RD X49 Grade and Pave, Right of Way, New Bridge

-----

Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total

STP-E-1040()--8V-23 9th St: From 19th Ave to US 67 ped/bike paving STP-E-1147()--8V-31

-----

1 ST Ave: From Monroe Street to Nixon Street ped/bike grade & pave STP-E-1147()--8V-31 Liberty Ave: From 24th Place to South 14th Street ped/bike grade & pave

Programmed Amounts in 1,000 FY 13 $375 --

Remarks

FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 $25 $2,025 ---

---

$401

--------

-$395 --$395 ---

--------

$6,100 --$4,880 ------- $2,500 ######

-----

-- Federal Aid

-- ######

-- Regional FA

$200 $160 $160 $239

-----

-- Federal Aid

$191

-- Regional FA -- Total

191 $99

---

-- Federal Aid

$79

-- Regional FA

Enhancement 30

21129 Camanche 21112

Cascade 21130

Clinton

Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 28

TPMS NO Sponsor Status Enhancement

Project # Location Type of work 21113

Dyersville

Bellevue

Camanche

Project Funding

Programmed Amounts in 1,000 FY 13

Remarks

FY 14 FY 15 FY 16

STP-E-2160(612)--8V-31

-- Total

$313

Along 3rd Ave SW: 5th St SW to 1st St SW & south on 3rd St SW & 3rd Ave SW to the drainage ditch along 5th St and Bear Creek

-- Federal Aid

$250

------

$250 $694 $250 $250 --

----$297

------

-- Federal Aid

$237

--------

$237 -------

-$194 $155 $155 $249 $151 $151

--------

$2,900

-- Federal Aid

-- Regional FA

$2,408

$2,168

-- $4,960 -----

----

ped/bike grade & pave 34

Length FHWA # Sec: Township

Bellevue Riverview Trail (phase II): from 399th Ave to Int 395t hAve on US 52 ped/bike grade & pave 2012 Washington Boulevard/MRT Enhancement Project: from 2nd Ave to 14th Ave on washington Blvd ped/bike grade & pave

Manchester

West Marion Street Trail ped/bike grade & pave

Manchester

Riverfront Trail Extension ped/bike grade & pave

Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total

Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA

Earmarks 19935

TCSP-1415(614)--9S-23 19TH AVE N: From N 2nd St to Mill Creek 33 Clinton Park Way Grade and Pave Highway Safety Improvement Program 22273 HSIP-()--2H-23 US 61: From 3 Mi. N of Welton to IA 64 34 IADOT Interchange in Maquoketa Pavement Widening Illustrative 18705 ILL-1040()--93-23 Camanche WASHINGTON BLVD: From Hwy 67 to Hwy 35 Work not Assigned

1.27 Miles Total

13.15 Miles Total -- Federal Aid -- Regional FA 2.61 Miles Total -- Federal Aid -- Regional FA

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 29

TPMS NO Sponsor Status Illustrative

Project # Location Type of work 21031

DeWitt 21099

Clinton

Highway Bridge Program 498 38 IADOT

9367 Delaware CRD

18953 Delaware CRD

20490 Jackson CRD

16650 Clinton CRD

21884 Jackson CRD

20855 IADOT

20486 Jackson CRD

21885 Jackson CRD

Length FHWA # Sec: Township

Project Funding

ILL-1855()--93-23 S 6TH AVE: From 4th St to Union Pacific RR tracks Pave ILL-1415()--93-23 44th Ave S/44th Ave South: From Union Specific Rail rd main line N 0 MI to Drop/Pole yard in Lincoln way rail park Work not Assigned

0.28 Miles Total

BRFN-52-0()--39-49 US 52/US 52 : Mississippi River at Sabula Bridge rehablitation & washing BROS-C028()--8J-28 255th Avenue: Over Plum Creek Bridge Replacement BROS-C028()--8J-28 310TH AVE: Over an unnamed stream Bridge Replacement BROS-C049()--5F-49 30 AVE: Over S Fork Maq River Bridge Replacement BRS-C023(88)--60-23 Y54/230th Ave: Over creek Bridge Replacement BROS-C049()--5F-49 140th Ave: Otter Creek Twp Sec. 21 140th Ave Bridge Replacement BRF-52()--38-49 US 52: MISSISSIPPI RIVER OVERFLOW IN Bridge Replacement BROS-C049()--5F-49 35 ST: Over prairie Creek Bridge Replacement BROS-C049()--5F-49 584th Ave: 584th Ave Union Twp Sec. 36 Bridge Replacement

-29940 -0.25 Miles 141550 -0.01 Miles 141320 -0.25 Miles 193240 -0.1 Miles 123610

Programmed Amounts in 1,000 FY 13

-- $1,800

-- Federal Aid

-- Regional FA -- Total

---- $3,200

---

-- Federal Aid

-- Regional FA

0.15 Miles 194190 ---0.25 Miles 192330 -0.15 Miles 193050 --

Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA Total Federal Aid Regional FA

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

$20 --$350 $280 -$200 $160 -$900 $720 -$315 $252 --------------

Remarks

FY 14 FY 15 FY 16

$20 $3,020 31020 --- 24816 ---------------------------------------$500 --$400 ------$20 $3,469 --- $2,775 ----$500 --$400 ------$150 --$120 ----

Page 30

RPA 8 Final FY 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program Map TPMS NUMBERS ON MAP CORRESPOND WITH TPMS NUMBERS ON SPREADSHEET Prepared by ECIA 06-28-12 The preparation of this map was financed in part through federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and/or Federal Transit Administration.

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 31

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Transit Projects for FFY 2013 - 2016

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 32

Regional Planning Affiliation 8 (FY 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program) FY 2013 ( October 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013) Federal Funds NO

Sponsor : TPMS ID ECIA 1

Type of Expenditure

Description

Type of Project

Sec 5311 & 5314 Planning RPA : 1424

Misc

Sec 5309 RTA : 1414 Sec 5309 RTA : 1416 Sec 5309 RTA : 1417 Sec 5309 RTA : 1833 Sec 5309 RTA : 1834 Sec 5309 RTA : 1835 Sec 5309 RTA : 2459 Sec 5309 RTA : 2460 Sec 5309 RTA : 2461 Sec 5309 RTA : 2462 Sec 5311

Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Operating

RTA : 1408

Misc

Sec 5316 RTA : 1409 Sec 5317 RTA : 1410 Sec 5317 RTA : 2229 STP RTA : 2611

Operating Expansion Operating Misc Operating Replacement Operating Replacement

RPA Planning/Coordination

Transit Project Funding

Final June 28th 2012 Programmed Amounts Remarks FY 13

FY 14

FY 15

FY 16

Total

$30,183

Federal Aid

$24,146

RTA 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:384 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:650 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:470 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:601 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:102 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A). ID:945 New Project New Project New Project New Project General Opertations JARC Operations New Freedoms - project continuation New Freedoms Mobility Coordinator Continuation Funding Security Cameras

Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid State Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid Total Federal Aid

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

$77,000 ---$63,910 ---$77,000 ---$63,910 ----$77,000 ---$73,910 ---$77,000 ---$73,910 ----$77,000 ---$73,910 ---$77,000 ---$73,910 ----$77,000 ---$73,910 ---$77,000 ---$73,910 ---$77,000 ---$73,910 ---$77,000 ---$73,910 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $216,364 $216,364 $216,364 $216,364 $233,222 $233,222 $233,222 $233,222

439,114

$166,000 $96,382 $41,859 $137,650 $110,120 $74,712 $59,770

$166,000 $96,382 $41,859 $137,650 $110,120 ---

Page 33

Federal Funds NO

Sponsor : TPMS ID MTA Sec 5309 16 MTA : 1392 Sec 5309 17 MTA : 1393 Sec 5309 18 MTA : 1398 Sec 5309 19 MTA : 1401 Sec 5309 20 MTA : 1404 Sec 5309 21 MTA : 1405 Sec 5309 22 MTA : 1407 Sec 5309 23 MTA : 1406 Sec 5309 24 MTA : 1400 Sec 5311 25 MTA : 1391 Sec 5309 26 MTA : 2590 Sec 5309 27 MTA : 2591

Type of Expenditure

Description

Type of Project Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Replacement Capital Expansion Capital Replacement Capital Expansion Capital Replacement Operating Misc Operating Replacement Operating Replacement

Heavy Duty Bus (30-34 ft.). Deisel, UFRC, VSS, Low Floor. ID: 9743 Heavy Duty Bus (30-34 ft.). Deisel, UFRC, VSS, Low Floor. ID: 471 Light Duty Bus (158" wb). Deisel, UFRC, VSS. ID: 563 One non-ADA standard minivan One service truck Diesel 4x4 GPS Technology/AVL Locator Dispatching software Vehicle hoist / Equipment Light Duty Bus (158" wb). Deisel, UFRC, VSS. ID: 564 General Opertations Light Duty Bus (176" wb). Deisel, UFRC, VSS. ID: 0640 Light Duty Bus (176" wb). Deisel, UFRC, VSS. ID: 00-51

Project Funding

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Programmed Amounts Remarks FY 13

FY 14

$390,000 $232,700 $379,000 $317,060 $83,000 $75,530 $31,000 $24,800 ----------$831,142 $415,571 $96,000 $79,680 $96,000 $79,680

--------$42,848 $34,278 $300,000 $240,000 $75,000 $60,000 $41,200 $32,960 $93,359 $77,488 $831,142 $415,571 -----

FY 15 ------------------$0 $0 -----

FY 16 ------------------$0 $0 -----

Page 34

RPA 8 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM

Accommodation: Meetings, public hearings, and ECIA formal events are held in facilities that are accessible by persons with disabilities. Public notices of ECIA meetings and events include a notice of location for public. Individuals with disabilities will be provided with accommodations to attend the meetings on request with a minimum of one weeks notice. Individuals requiring special material or presentation formats will be asked to contact the staff at least one week before the meeting.

Revising/Amending an Approved TIP Revising the TIP Revisions are defined as changes to a TIP that occur between scheduled periodic updates. There are two types of changes that occur under the umbrella of revision. The first is a major revision or “Amendment”. The second is a minor revision or Administrative Modification”. Amendment An amendment is a revision to a TIP that involves a major change to a project included in the TIP. This includes an addition or deletion of a project or a major change in project cost, project/project phase initiation dates, or a major change in design concept or scope (e.g. changing project termini or the number of through lanes). Changes to projects that are included only for illustrative purposes do not require an amendment. An amendment is a revision that requires public review and comment, redemonstration of fiscal constraint, or a conformity determination. Changes that affect fiscal constraint must take place by amendment of the TIP. The TIP Amendment Process will include the following steps:  

  

RPA 8 staff will collect the amendment information from the members requesting. RPA 8 staff will inform the public of the amended TIP’s availability by sending notice to the organizations on the RPA 8 public participation process list and by publishing legal notices in local newspapers and ECIA website. Theses notices will be posted and published 4-20 days before the scheduled meeting. The public hearing meeting will be held with the RPA 8 Policy Board meeting and the meeting will be opened for public input during the process. The DOT and FHWA staff will be provided with updated TIP with amendments once approved by RPA 8 Policy and tech boards. The public hearing meeting will be held with the RPA 8 Policy Board meeting and the meeting will be opened for public input during the process.

Administrative Modification A minor revision to a TIP is an administrative modification. It includes minor changes/project phase costs, minor changes to funding sources of previously-included projects, and minor changes to RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 35

project/project phase initiation dates. An administrative modification is a revision that does not require public review and comment or redemonstration of fiscal constraint, Amendment vs. Administrative Modification There are four main components that can be used to determine whether a project change constitutes an amendment or an administrative modification. They include the following: 

Project costs-Determination will be made based on the percentage change or dollar amount of change in federal aid. Projects in which the federal aid has been changed by more than 30% or total federal aid increases by $2.0 million or more will require an amendment. Anything less can be processed with an administrative modification.



Schedule changes-Changes in schedules to projects which are included in the first four years of the TIP/STIP will be considered administrative modifications. Projects which are added or deleted from the TIP/STIP will be processed as amendments.



Funding sources-Additional federal funding sources to a project will require an amendment. Changes to funding from one source to another will require an administrative modification.



Scope changes-Changing project termini or changing the amount of through traffic lanes will be processed as an amendment. Other examples of changes that require amendment are changing the type of work from an overlay to reconstruction. Another example is changing a project to include widening of the roadway.

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 36

Resolution ECIA Regional Planning Affiliation FFY 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program WHEREAS, the ECIA–RPA Transportation Improvement Program information is developed as a description and justification of transportation improvements proposed for Federal Fiscal years of 2013 through 2016; and, WHEREAS, the East Central Intergovernmental Association Regional Planning Affiliation has been formed in cooperation with the Iowa Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, and the Federal Transit Administration to jointly plan and program federal and state transportation improvements in the Region; and, WHEREAS, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users makes available federal highway and transit funding to make improvements in the State of Iowa and the ECIA–RPA region; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ECIA Regional Planning Affiliation that the FFY 2013–2016 Transportation Improvement Program is hereby approved.

Adopted this on 28th of June 2012.

___ Larry Buck Koos Chair, RPA Policy Board

_06/28/2012___________ Date

ATTEST:

Kelley Deutmeyer Executive Director, ECIA

_06/28/2012___________ Date

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 37

Appendix D General RPA Funding Guide to Transportation Surface Transportation Projects The Regional Planning Affiliation (RPA) tech Committee oversees the program that provides funds to sponsors of transportation projects that expand travel choices and enhance the transportation experience. This committee reviews, scores, and recommends project applications requesting Surface Transportation Project (STP) funds. Their recommendations are given to the RPA Policy Committee for approval. The committee consists of a rotating balance of local government and public works officials in the region. The RPA Tech committee follows the rules and regulations pertaining to the program as set forth in the Federal Highway Administration. However, some additional restrictions have been placed to make the program more efficient and maximize the federal dollars used for construction activities.

Project Obligation: The project should be obligated within two Federal Fiscal years which includes the Federal Fiscal year that the funding got programmed in RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The Federal Fiscal year starts on October 1st of the current calendar year and goes until September 30th of the next calendar year. If funds have not been obligated at the end of the two year time period the funds will be returned to RPA 8.

FHWA Authorization of Construction Costs As part of the letting process, the Iowa DOT obtains FHWA Authorization for the costs of the proposed construction contract. FHWA Authorization will be requested based on the plans, specifications, and estimate (PS&E) submitted by the Local Public Agency (LPA). If the bids come in significantly higher or lower than the estimate, the FHWA Authorization may be adjusted accordingly, provided that sufficient Federal funds are available for the project. The Iowa DOT requires that the LPA budget sufficient funds and be prepared to award a contract for bids that are up to 110% of the LPAâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s estimate. Please see below for FEDERAL AID PROJECT DEVELOPMENT GUIDE http://www.iowadot.gov/local_systems/publications/im/guide.pdf

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM EVALUATION CRITERIA

1. Economic Vitality: 275 Points (27.5%) 4. System Preservation: 200 Points (20%) 2. Safety: 200 Points (20%) RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 38

3. Accessibility and Mobility: 125 Points (12.5%) 5. Integration and Connectivity: 75 Points (7.5%) 6. Local and Regional Factors: 125 Points (12.5%) TOTAL POINTS AVAILABLE: 1000 (100%)

The process for project prioritization and ratings will be the following: 1. Projects are submitted to RPA 8, with all required information no later than final submittal date set by RPA 8, December 3, 2010 by 5:00 PM. 2. Applications will be compiled for the Subcommittee for STP funding distribution. The Subcommittee will then meet and rank the projects based on the evaluation criteria adopted by the Board. The subcommittee will submit the list to RPA 8 Tech and Policy Boards. 3. The Tech Board will provide their input to Policy Board. The Policy Board will review the ranking list and associated documentation and prepare a draft Transportation Improvement Program for inclusion into the Iowa State Transportation Improvement Program. Please refer to the Application Guide for additional information on scoring criteria. EVALUATION CRITERIA This section will provide information specifically for the competitive rating section of the Region 16 STP Application. The information is ordered by rating criteria developed from the seven SAFETEA-LU planning factors that are meant to guide federal-aid projects funded by SAFETEA-LU legislation. The Transportation Advisory Committee will rank the projects according to subjective and objective scoring factors. All scores will be sent to the Policy Board for review and TIP construction. ECONOMIC VITALITY 275 Total Points Available The Economic Vitality section of the application is designed to measure the economic impact that a proposed project will have locally and regionally. All of the rating in this section is subjective. Members of the Transportation Advisory Committee will rate the effects that the proposed project will have on the rating criteria based on the merits of the project. Below illustrates how the 275 points are distributed for each project: 75 Points - Project promotes general economic development. 40 Points - Project specifically enhances or improves tourism. 40 Points - Project specifically improves or enhances movement of freight and services. 40 Points - Project improves or enhances movement of workers. RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 39

40 Points - Project improves access to jobs and business opportunities. 40 Points - Project improves access to other transportation facilities including air, water, rail, multimodal, etc. SYSTEM PRESERVATION 200 Total Points Available Points are awarded based on current surface type, current pavement condition, current AADT, and future AADT. The information for each of the previously mentioned categories is plugged into a formula and the point value is determined by where the formula solution fits into the points range. Below is an example of how the system preservation formula may be applied to a proposed project: 1) Surface Type: Portland Concrete 1 2) Facility Condition: 2 3) Existing AADT: 5,800 4) 10-year projected AADT: 6,400 Formula 1: [(Existing AADT + 10 Year AADT)/1000/2] Formula 2: [(Formula 1 Answer/2)*(Surface Type)*(Facility Condition)] Formula 1: [(5,800 + 6,400)/1,000/2] = 6.1 Formula 2: [(6.1/2)*(1)*(2)]= 6.1 = Project awarded 52 Points as shown in the table below System Preservation Scoring Criteria Range Points Range <.50 0.51-1.00 1.01-1.50 1.51-2.00 2.01-2.50 2.51-3.00 3.01-3.50 3.51-4.00 4.01-4.50 4.51-5.00 5.01-5.50 5.51-6.00 6.01-6.50 6.51-7.00 7.01-7.50 7.51-8.00 8.01-8.50 8.51-9.00 9.01-9.50

4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76

12.51-13.00 13.01-13.50 13.51-14.00 14.01-14.50 14.51-15.00 15.01-15.50 15.51-16.00 16.01-16.50 16.51-17.00 17.01-17.50 17.51-18.00 18.01-18.50 18.51-19.00 19.01-19.50 19.51-20.00 20.01-20.50 20.51-21.00 21.01-21.50 21.51-22.00

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Points 104 108 112 116 120 124 128 132 136 140 144 148 152 156 160 164 168 172 176 Page 40

9.51-10.00 10.01-10.50 10.51-11.00 11.01-11.50 11.51-12.00 12.01-12.50

80 84 88 92 96 100

22.01-22.50 22.51-23.00 23.01-23.50 23.51-24.00 24.01-24.50 24.51-25.00

180 184 188 192 196 200

SAFETY 200 Total Points Available Safety is designed to measure how accidents on the proposed facility compare with state rates and what proportion of the project cost will go towards safety improvements. The Transportation Advisory Committee will rank projects based on factual numbers supplied by applicants and their corresponding point ranges. Data used in this section includes accident rates and cost of safety improvements of the proposed project. Applicants will acquire accident data from the previous five years and complete the accident rate calculation located in the application. The end result should be a ratio in units of accidents per hundred million vehicle miles (HMVM) of the calculated rate for the proposed project to the state rate for cities or counties. Points will be awarded based on the accident rate as shown in the table below: Accident Rate Scoring Criteria Accident Ratio Points <0.49 0.50-0.99 1.00-1.99 2.00-2.99 3.00-3.99 4.00-<

0 20 40 60 80 100

The proportion of the total project cost to cost of safety improvements uses data from the applicant that should specifically describe what parts of the project are for safety improvements. All safety improvements must be located on the approved safety improvement list included at the end of this document and in the STP Application. The cost for safety improvements should then be divided by the total cost for the safety improvement cost/total cost ratio. Points are awarded based on the proportion of funding put towards making safety improvements as shown below. Safety Improvement Scoring Criteria Percent Points <15% 15-25% 25-35% 35-45%

0 20 40 60

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 41

45-55% 55-65% ACCESSIBILITY

AND

80 100

MOBILITY

125 Total Points Available Accessibility and Mobility is designed to measure how the proposed project will make users of the transportation system more mobile. The Transportation Advisory Committee will rank the projects based on factual numbers supplied by the applicants or RPA 8 and their corresponding point ranges. RPA 8 will calculate volume/capacity ratios by dividing current and projected traffic volumes by a capacity table developed from the Highway Capacity Manual. This table may be found on the Page 17. Points will be awarded based on Existing Volume/Capacity Ratio using the scoring criteria in the table below. Existing Volume/Capacity Ratio Scoring Criteria Volume/Capacity Points 0.00-0.062 0.063-0.125 0.126-0.188 0.189-0.251 0.252-0.314 0.315-0.503 0.504-0.629 0.630-0.818 0.819-0.944 0.945-1.070 1.071-1.096

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 65

Points will be awarded for projects in which the volume/capacity ratio is reduces due to the proposed project. Points will be awarded based on the following table. Volume/Capacity Reduction Scoring Criteria Volume/Capacity Points Ranges Change 0 0 1 20 2 40 3 60

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 42

Volume Capacity Table

RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 43

INTEGRATION

AND

CONNECTIVITY

75 Points Total Points Available Integration and Connectivity is designed to measure what impact the proposed project will have on connecting and integrating the transportation system. The Transportation Advisory Committee will rank projects based on factual numbers and on the committee memberâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s feelings on how the proposed project will impact the transportation system in this category. Below illustrates how the 75 points are distributed for the integration and connectivity category. 75 Points - Project improves connectivity to a road classified as arterial or higher? 75 Points - Project improves connectivity for freight transportation including air, water, rail, and truck? 75 Points - Project integrates multiple modes of transportation including transit, trail, and auto? LOCAL

AND

REGIONAL FACTORS

125 Total Points Available Local and regional factors will evaluate what planning documents the proposed project are consistent with, the amount of local match involved, how the proposed project will impact the transportation system, and if there is more than one sponsor involved. The adopted planning document could include a long range transportation plan, comprehensive plan, capital improvements plan, or any other local, regional, or state planning document. 25 points will be awarded based on the number of planning documents in which a project conforms with and the significance of the planning document. Projects will be awarded points based on the amount of local match ratio contributed to the project. Projects that have match ratios in between the ratios listed as point ranges will be grouped in the point range above the actual ratio. For instance, if a proposed project has a federal/local match of 72/28, that project will be grouped in the 80/20 range. A proposed project that has a federal/local match ratio of 68/32 will be grouped in the 70/30 range. Local Match Ratio Scoring Criteria Fed/Local Match

Points

80/20 0 70/30 8.25 60/40 16.75 50/50 25 In addition, points will be awarded based on the following questions: 25 Points - Project will contribute to the local AND regional transportation system. 25 Points - Proposed project involves more than one project sponsor. RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2013-2016

Page 44