T
RANSPORTATION
I
MPROVEMENT
P
ROGRAM
FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS
2015 - 2018
ECIA REGIONAL PLANNING AFFILIATION 8 Draft: May 01st 2014
PREPARED BY
EAST CENTRAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL ASSOCIATION Suite 200, 3999 Pennsylvania Avenue, Dubuque, Iowa 52002 563.556.4166, FAX 563.556.0348
Disclaimer The preparation of this document was financed in part through funds provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration.
CAVEAT The contents of this document reflect information given to ECIA by the various implementing agencies. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 1
Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 RPA Membership and Governance .................................................................................................. 4 RPA Organization and Management ................................................................................................ 5 RPA Policy Board................................................................................................................................ 5 RPA Policy Board: .................................................................................................................. 5 RPA 8 Technical Advisory Committee: ........................................................................... 6 RPA Overall Goal ................................................................................................................................ 6 The 2012 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) .................................. 7 Status of Transportation Improvement Projects programmed in FFY 2014............................... 9 Fund Availability ............................................................................................................................... 14 Iowa STP Program .................................................................................................................. 15 Overall Program Funding ....................................................................................................... 18 Federal funding ....................................................................................................................... 18 County Bridge Program .......................................................................................................... 20 City Bridge Program ............................................................................................................... 20 RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Transportation Projects for FFY 2015 - 2018....................................................................................................................................... 21 RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Transit Projects for FFY 2015 - 2018 .. 26 RPA 8 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM ......................................................................... 29 Revising/Amending an Approved TIP ................................................................................... 29 Resolution ........................................................................................................................................... 31 Appendix D......................................................................................................................................... 32 General RPA Funding Guide to Transportation Surface Transportation Projects .................. 32
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 2
Abbreviations AVL BRP BROS BRS DMATS ECIA ESP FFY FHWA FM FTA GO BONDS HD Bus IBRCP Iowa DOT ITS ISTEA JARC LD Bus LOST LRTP NHS RISE ROW RPA RUTF Sec 3 Sec 18 Sec 16 STA STP STPTE TAC TANF TEA-21 TIP TPWP
Automatic Vehicle Locator Bridge Replacement Program Bridge Replacement Off-System Bridge Replacement On System Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation Study East Central Intergovernmental Association Economic Stimulus Project Federal Fiscal Year Federal Highway Administration Farm-to-Market Federal Transit Administration General Obligation Bonds Heavy Duty Bus Innovative Bridge Research & Construction Program Iowa Department of Transportation Intelligent Transportation Systems Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 Job Access/Reverse Commute Light Duty Bus Local Option Sales Tax Long Range Transportation Plan National Highway System Revitalize Iowa's Sound Economy (IOWA DOT Grant/Loan Program) Right of Way Regional Planning Affiliation Road Use Tax Fund FTA discretionary capital funds FTA operating, capital, and planning funds FTA capital and operating funds for non-profits State Transit Assistance Surface Transportation Program Surface Transportation Program Transportation Enhancement Technical Advisory Committee Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Planning Work Program
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 3
Introduction The Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2015-2018 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for the East Central Intergovernmental Association Regional Planning Affiliation (RPA) is a four year listing of federal aid eligible transportation projects selected by the various governmental agencies and by Regional Planning Affiliation (RPA) Policy Board for implementation. All transportation projects in the RPA Region using federal funds are to be included in the TIP. The TIP is prepared annually for the RPA Policy Board with input from the Technical Advisory Committee, Iowa Department of Transportation, and the general public. Prioritization of projects within a project year is determined by the implementing agencies. Prioritization of Long Range Transportation Plan projects on a year-to-year basis will be done by the RPA Policy Board in cooperation with the implementing agency. RPA Membership and Governance The East Central Intergovernmental Association Regional Planning Affiliation (RPA) membership is made up of 56 local cities and counties in a four county area in eastern Iowa. All member jurisdictions have signed a 28E agreement to conduct transportation planning and the programming of federal transportation funds as determined by the Iowa Department of Transportation. The Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation Study (DMATS) area in greater Dubuque is excluded from the RPA because it is a separate transportation planning area. The DMATS region includes the Cities of Dubuque, Asbury, Sageville, Peosta, Centralia and Durango, as well as portions of Dubuque County. The ECIA RPA is staffed by the East Central Intergovernmental Association, which has no formal membership on either the RPA Policy Board or the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). At their request, the Iowa Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are only advisory members of the RPA Policy Board and Tech advisory committee. The 56 member local jurisdictions include four counties and four urban areas (population greater than 5,000). The four urban areas are the Cities of Clinton, DeWitt, Manchester, and Maquoketa. The total members of the ECIA RPA include: CLINTON DELAWARE DUBUQUE JACKSON Clinton County Andover Calamus Camanche Charlotte Clinton Delmar DeWitt Goose Lake Grand Mound Lost Nation Low Moor Toronto Welton Wheatland
Delaware County Colesburg Delaware Delhi Dundee Earlville Edgewood Greeley Hopkinton Manchester Masonville Ryan
Dubuque County Balltown Bankston Bernard Cascade Dyersville Epworth Farley Graf Holy Cross Luxemburg New Vienna Rickardsville Sherrill Worthington Zwingle
Jackson County Andrew Baldwin Bellevue LaMotte Maquoketa Miles Monmouth Preston St. Donatus Sabula Spragueville Springbrook
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 4
RPA Organization and Management The East Central Intergovernmental Association Regional Planning Affiliation was established on February 2, 1994 through the adoption of Articles of Agreement by the participating organizations in the region. It is one of the 18 RPA's in the state that were formed as part of the Iowa Department of Transportation's implementation of Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), particularly in regard to meeting the statewide planning and programming aspects of the legislation. This cooperative, comprehensive, and continuing transportation planning process was established by an agreement between the state and local governments in compliance with the provisions of the ISTEA. The planning process is implemented through a committee structure. Committees forward their recommendations to the Policy Board for consideration and final action. At this time, the only standing committee is the Technical Advisory Committee, which was formed by the Policy Board at its first meeting on February 2, 1994. The Policy Board and Technical Advisory Committee's responsibilities are summarized below: RPA Policy Board The ECIA RPA is governed by a Board of twelve elected officials from the member jurisdictions. The Policy Board is responsible for establishing overall policy, making decisions related to transportation planning and project funding priorities, and monitoring the direction of studies of transportation conditions in the region. There is a Board member from each of the four counties, and a Board member from each of the four large urban areas. The remaining four Board members are from a non-urban city in each of the four counties which are elected by caucus every two years. RPA Policy Board: Clinton County Jon Staszewski (Supervisor) Clinton County
Delaware County Jeff Madlom (Supervisor) Delaware County Dubuque County Daryl Klein (Supervisor) Dubuque County Jackson County Larry “Buck� Koos (Chair) (Supervisor-Jackson County) Ex officio (non-voting members) Mokhtee Ahmad (Admin) FTA Reg. VII (Proxy Mark Betchel)
Mark Vulich City of Clinton Don Thiltgen (Vice Chair) (Mayor, City of DeWitt)
Tom Roth (City Administrator) City of Camanche
Milt Kramer (Mayor) City of Manchester
Margie Horstman Delaware County
Wayne Demmer (Supervisor) RTA
Mick Michel City of Dyersville
Don Schwenker (Mayor) City of Maquoketa
Paul Konrardy (Mayor) City of LaMotte
Stu Anderson (Plng. & Prog) Iowa DOT (Proxy Sam Shea)
Lubin Quinones (Admin) FHWA, Iowa Div. (Proxy Tracy Trounter)
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 5
RPA 8 Technical Advisory Committee: The Technical Advisory Committee consists of professional staff persons from the RPA member jurisdictions. The Technical Committee reviews, studies, and makes recommendations to the Policy Board related to technical issues affecting spending and study priorities. COUNTIES Todd Kinney, Chair County Engineer
Anthony Bardgett County Engineer
URBAN AREAS Clinton County Jason Craft City Engineer, Clinton Steve Lindner City Administrator, DeWitt Delaware County Timothy J. Vick City Manager, Manchester Dubuque County
Bret Wilkinson County Engineer
Transit Randy Zobrist Executive Director, River Bend Dennis Hart Director, MTA
Lori McKinley Director,RTA
Jackson County Brian Wagner, Vice Chair City Manager, Maquoketa Ex officio (non-voting members) Mark Bechtel, FTA Reg.VII Sham Shea, Iowa DOT Tracy Troutner Community Planner District Planner, District 6 FHWA Iowa Division Ryan Ward, Transit System Administrator Office of Public Transit, Iowa DOT Clark Schloz County Engineer
RPA Overall Goal The Goal of the ECIA Regional Planning Affiliation is to further develop the transportation system with a vision toward improving safety, promoting economic development and improving the quality of life within the RPA Region with consideration being given to the various levels of political sub-divisions and to alternative forms of transportation such as transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Major Projects and Concerns within the RPA Region 1. Implementation of the U.S. 30/67 Corridor Improvements in the City of Clinton. 2. To improve U.S. 30 to 4 lanes from DeWitt west to Mount Vernon. This entire route is now shown in the state’s long range plan as a 4-lane roadway. 3. Mississippi River Trail. Annual Transportation Improvement Program RPA staff, is required to develop a transportation improvement program for the Regional Planning Affiliation 8 (RPA 8) and is further required to provide citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, other affected employee representatives, private RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 6
providers of transportation, and other interested parties with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed program during the process. The TIP is to have a listing of projects that are scheduled to be carried out within a 4-year period of when they were initially adopted into the RPA 8 TIP. The TIP will include a financial explanation of the improvement projects that detail how each will be implemented as well as an indication of what public and private resources can be expected to be made available to complete the transportation improvement. Before the RPA 8 Policy Committee can approve any transportation improvement, it will provide citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, private providers of transportation, and other interested parties with reasonable notice of and an opportunity to comment on the proposed improvement. The TIP Process will include the following steps: • •
• •
•
RPA 8 staff will start developing the TIP in month of February following rules and regulations adopted by the Iowa DOT. After the draft TIP is finished, it will be released for a 30-day public review process in May. DMATS staff will inform the public of the draft TIP’s availability by sending notice to the organizations on the RPA 8 public participation process list and by publishing legal notices in local newspapers and ECIA website. Theses notices will be printed 4 -20 days before the scheduled meeting. The public hearing will be held with the RPA 8 Policy Board meeting in May. The meeting will be opened for public input during the process. After the final TIP is finished, it will be released for a 30-day public review process in June. RPA staff will inform the public of the final TIP’s availability by sending notice to the organizations on the RPA 8 public participation process list and by publishing legal notices in local newspapers and ECIA website. Theses notices will be published 4 -20 days before the scheduled meeting. The public hearing will be held with the RPA 8 Policy Board meeting in June. The meeting will be opened for public input during the process.
The 2012 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) bill sets out the following guidelines for planning: • • • • •
•
Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non‐motorized users; Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non‐motorized users; Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight; Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns; Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight;
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 7
• •
Promote efficient system management and operation; and Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
In addition, the current administration is promoting livability principles that are to be considered in the metropolitan planning process activities. These principles are: • • • • • •
Provide more transportation choices Promote equitable, affordable housing Enhance economic competitiveness Support existing communities Coordinate policies and leverage investments, and Value communities and neighborhoods.
Failure to consider any one of the areas is not reviewable in court.
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 8
Status of Transportation Improvement Projects programmed in FFY 2014
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 9
Regional Planning Affiliation 8 (FY 2014-2017 Transportation Improvement Program) FY 2014 ( October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014) NO 2014
County
Pgm
Sponsor
TPMS#
PN
Clinton
TAP
Camanche
22306 STP-E-1040(607)--8V-23
2
Dubuque
TAP
Cascade
21112 STP-E-1147()--8V-31
3
Jackson
TAP
Bellevue
22305 TAP-R-0520(602)--8T-49
4
Clinton
TAP
Camanche
22306 STP-E-1040(607)--8V-23
5
Clinton
STP-HBP
Welton
26979 BROS-8235(601)--8J-23
6
Delaware
STP-HBP
Delaware CRD
7
Delaware
STP-HBP
8
Jackson
9
Clinton Clinton
Ped/Bike Grade & Pave
1st Ave Trail
LCL 2014
FM 2014
SPCL 2014
FA 2014
TTL 2014
Dev Status
0
60
0
0
237
297 Active
0 MI
48
0
0
191
239 --
Letting Dates DOT: 07/15/2014
Status FHWA Approved FHWA Approved
0
0
250
694 Active
DOT: 06/17/2014
FHWA Approved
Ped/Bike Grade & Pave
0
60
0
0
237
297 Active
DOT: 07/15/2014
FHWA Approved
On 180th Street, Over Silver Creek (West)
Bridge Replacement
0
110
0
0
440
550 Active
DOT: 05/19/2015
FHWA Approved
19148 BROS-C028(83)--8J-28
300TH AVE: From 265th Street to 250th Street
Bridge Replacement
300th Ave Bridge
0.01 MI
40
0
0
160
200 Canceled
Delaware CRD
23526 BROS-C028(84)--8J-28
310th Ave: Hwy 3 S 0.25 MI
Bridge Replacement
310th Ave Bridge
0.05 MI
70
0
0
280
350 Active
DOT: 04/15/2014
Authorized
STP-HBP
Jackson CRD
21884 BROS-C049(58)--5F-49
140th Ave: Otter Creek Twp Sec. 21 140th Ave
Bridge Replacement
OC-2150 140th Ave
0 MI
0
100
0
400
500 Active
DOT: 06/17/2014
FHWA Approved
STP-HBP
Clinton CRD
14363 BROS-C023(96)--8J-23
278 St: Over Rock Creek
Bridge Replacement
Q-3555
0.1 MI
0
60
0
240
300 Canceled
1250
0
0
1200
118
0
0
474
592 Awarded
483
0
0
213
696 Active
0 MI
5
0
0
20
Quarry St
0 MI
89
0
0
352
441 Active
DOT: 02/17/2015
FHWA Approved
Farley Rd
5.691 MI
1100
0
0
4400
5500 Active
DOT: 09/16/2014
FHWA Approved
0 MI
14
0
0
58
0 MI
0
110
0
440
550 Active
66
0
0
265
331 --
STP
Clinton
22302 STP-U-1415(625)--70-23
Manchester
20793 STP-U-4682(622)--70-28
12
Delaware
STP
Manchester
20794 STP-U-4682(623)--70-28
13
Jackson
STP
Maquoketa
11741 STP-U-4742(IA64)--70-49
14
Jackson
STP
Maquoketa
21345 STP-U-4742(618)--70-49
15
Dubuque
STP
Dubuque CRD
14415 STP-S-C031(63)--5E-31
STP
RPA-08
STP
Delaware CRD
478 RGPL-PA08(RTP)--ST-00 18957 STP-S-C028(85)--5E-28
18
Jackson
STP
La Motte
26639 STP-U-4080()--70-49
19
Clinton
STP
Camanche
22195 STP-U-1040(606)--70-23
20
Jackson
STP
Jackson CRD
19277 STP-S-C049(60)--5E-49
21
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
25225 NHSN-067()--2R-23
22
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
25227 NHSN-067()--2R-23
23
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
481 BRFN--136()--39-23
24
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
498 BRFN--52()--39-49
25
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
501 BRFN--30()--39-23
26
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
20849 BRFN-020()--39-28
27
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
20850 BRFN-020()--39-28
28
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
25261 NHSN-020()--2R-31
29
Ped/Bike Grade & Pave
Length
444
STP
Delaware
Local ID
0
Delaware
17
In the City of Camanche, 2012 Washington Boulevard/MRT: From 2nd Ave to 14th Ave In the City of Cascade, 1 ST Ave: From Monroe Street to Nixon Street On Bellevue Riverview Trail (phase II), from Jefferson Ave to Int 395th Ave on US 52 In the city of Camanche, On 2012 Washington Boulevard/MRT, from 3rd Street to 2nd Ave
Type of Work
Ped/Bike Grade & Pave
11
16
Programmed Amounts in 1,000
Location 2014
1
10
Project Status
IOWA
NHPP
DOT-D06-RPA08
21988 NHSX--20()--3H-28
Clinton CRD
26899 FLAP-C023(99)--6L-23
Clinton
21099 ILL-1415()--93-23
30
Clinton
MISC
31
Clinton
ILL
32
Clinton
ILL
De Witt
21031 ILL-1855()--93-23
33
Clinton
ILL
Camanche
18705 ILL-1040()--93-23
34
Clinton
ER
Clinton CRD
21428 ER-C023(98)--58-23
35
Delaware
TAP
Manchester
22307 STP-E-4682()--8V-28
36
Delaware
TAP
Manchester
22308 STP-E-4682()--8V-28
37
Delaware
TAP
Manchester
22308 STP-E-4682()--8V-28
38
Dubuque
STP-HBP
Dubuque CRD
21717 BROS-C031(B1307)--8J-31
In the City of Clinton, 19th Ave North Phase III: From Grade and Pave Approx. 1100' West of Randall to N. 2nd Street In the City of Manchester, BURRINGTON RD: From Pavement Rehab Hwy 13 to Enterprise Avenue In the City of Manchester, S 5TH ST: From South 5th Pavement Rehab Enterprise Ave to Grant Street In the City of Maquoketa, MAIN ST: From MAIN ST Traffic Signals TEAP Study to REPLACEMENT In the City of Maquoketa, Quarry St: From N 2nd St to Pavement Rehab,Outside N Olive St Services Engineering Y-13: From City of Farley to City of Cascade
Pave,Granular Shoulders
ECIA: RPA 8 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Trans Planning
C-64: From Greeley to Petersburg
Subdrains
Bridge Replacement on S Main St, Culvert Extension Bridge Over Farmers Creek and Improve Y61, from Park Ave Replacement,Culvert In the City of Camanche, 9th Ave: From Anamosa Rd Pavement Rehab to us 67 On Y31, from 234th Street to Dubuque County Line US67: IN CAMANCHE FROM SCL TO WASHINGTON BLVD US67: WASHINGTON BLVD (IN CAMANCHE)TO W JCT US 30 (IN CLINTON) IA136: MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN CLINTON (STATE SHARE) US52: MISSISSIPPI RIVER AT SABULA (STATE SHARE) US30: MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN CLINTON (STATE SHARE) US20: CHICAGO CENTRAL RR 0.9 MI E OF IA 13 (EB) US20: CHICAGO CENTRAL RR 0.9 MI E OF IA 13 (WB)
Pavement Rehab
0 South 5th-Burrington Road 0 MI Improvement Project - Phase South 5th-Burrington Road 0 MI Improvement Project - Phase
C64 From Greeley to Petersburg
0
2450 Active
FHWA Approved
FHWA Approved DOT: 04/21/2015
FHWA Approved Authorized
DOT: 12/16/2014
25 --
FHWA Approved FHWA Approved
72 --
Authorized DOT: 06/17/2014
FHWA Approved FHWA Approved
9th Ave
0 MI
107
0
0
100
207 Active
DOT: 07/15/2014
FHWA Approved
Bernard Road
4.2 MI
170
0
0
680
850 Active
DOT: 01/21/2015
FHWA Approved
Pavement Rehab
0
1400
0
0
0
1400 --
FHWA Approved
Pavement Widening
0
250
0
0
0
250 --
FHWA Approved
Bridge Painting
0 MI
20
0
0
0
20 --
FHWA Approved
0 MI
15
0
0
0
15 --
FHWA Approved
0 MI
35
0
0
0
35 --
FHWA Approved
Bridge Deck Overlay
0 MI
378
0
0
0
378 --
FHWA Approved
Bridge Deck Overlay
0 MI
378
0
0
0
378 --
FHWA Approved
US20: IN DYERSVILLE AT 136 INTERCHANGE
Slope Improvement
0 MI
19
0
0
0
19 --
FHWA Approved
US20: DYERSVILLE INTERCHANGE BETWEEN330TH AVE AND 332ND AVE On 170th Street, from Hwy 67 to Bulgers Hollow 0.26 Miles, on N1/4 S7 T82 R6E In the City of Clinton, 44th Ave S: Union Specific Rail rd main line N 0 MI to Drop/Pole yard in Lincoln way In the City of De Witt, S 6TH AVE: From Lake st to City limits In the City of Camanche, WASHINGTON BLVD: From Hwy 67 to Hwy 67
Grade and Pave,Bridge New,Right of Way
0.2
500
0
0
0
500 --
FHWA Approved
0
27
0
107
Y4E: Over creek
Culvert Replacement
In the City of Manchester, West Marion Street Trail: From S 9th St to S 12th St In the City of Manchester, Riverfront Trail Extension: From Western Union Street to Pool In the city of Manchester, On Riverfront Trail Extension, from Western Main Street to Pool OLDE MASSEY RD: Over CREEK
Bridge Rehabilitation
Bridge paint
Pavement Rehab
170th Street
0.21 MI
134 Active
DOT: 08/19/2014
Clinton Rail Port
0 MI
1200
0
2000
0
3200 --
FHWA Approved
Pave
6th Avenue (south section) Reconstruction
0 MI
1800
0
0
0
1800 --
FHWA Approved
Washington Blvd
0 MI
4960
0
0
0
4960 --
FHWA Approved
Q-1505s
0 MI
0
64
0
256
320 Active
DOT: 06/17/2014
Submitted
FHWA Approved
Ped/Bike Grade & Pave
0
39
0
0
155
194 --
FHWA Approved
Ped/Bike Grade & Pave
0
56
0
0
151
207 --
FHWA Approved
Ped/Bike Grade & Pave
0
56
0
0
151
207 --
In Prep
0 MI
50
0
0
200
250 --
FHWA Approved
Bridge Replacement
Bridge #1307
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 10
2015 39
2015 Jackson
40 41
STP-HBP STP
Clinton
STP
Jackson CRD
20486 BROS-C049()--5F-49
RPA-08 Calamus
2015
2015
35 ST: Over prairie Creek
Bridge Replacement
Codfish Hollow
0 MI
0
22194 RGTR-PA08()--ST-31
RTA: Security Cameras for Rta Buses
Transit Investments
Security Cameras
0 MI
15
22303 STP-U-1015()--27-23
In the City of Calamus, Y44: From Hwy 30 to Calamus Pavement Rehab Corporate line
2015
0
2015
8
2015
In the City of Manchester, S 5TH ST: From South 5th South 5th-Burrington Road Pavement Rehab 0 MI Enterprise Ave to Grant Street Improvement Project - Phase In the City of Maquoketa, Quarry St: From N 2nd St to Pavement Rehab,Outside Quarry St 0 MI N Olive St Services Engineering Culvert Replacement,Right IA136: 2.4 MI W OF US 67 TO CHARLOTTE 0 MI of Way
2015
42
Delaware
STP
Manchester
20794 STP-U-4682(623)--70-28
43
Jackson
STP
Maquoketa
21345 STP-U-4742(618)--70-49
44
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
25301 BRFN--136()--39-23
45
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
25249 BRFN--136()--39-23
IA136: IN CLINTON AT N 10TH ST
Culvert Replacement
0 MI
288
46
NHPP
DOT-D06-RPA08
25250 NHSX--136()--3H-23
IA136: IN CLINTON 0.1 MI W OF US 67
Culvert Replacement
0 MI
443
Bridge Painting
0 MI
2020
0 MI
515
0 MI
20
47
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
481 BRFN--136()--39-23
48
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
498 BRFN--52()--39-49
49
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
501 BRFN--30()--39-23
50
NHPP
DOT-D06-RPA08
21988 NHSX--20()--3H-28
2016
IA136: MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN CLINTON (STATE SHARE) US52: MISSISSIPPI RIVER AT SABULA (STATE SHARE) US30: MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN CLINTON (STATE SHARE) US20: DYERSVILLE INTERCHANGE BETWEEN330TH AVE AND 332ND AVE
Bridge Rehabilitation
Bridge paint
Grade and Pave,Bridge New,Right of Way
0.2
2016
165 137 15
3256
2016
2016
51
Dubuque
STP-HBP
Dubuque CRD
21719 BROS-C031(B712)--5F-31
Y17: Over LITTLE MAQUOKETA RIVER
Bridge Replacement
Bridge #712 Gun Club Rd
0 MI
100
52
Jackson
STP-HBP
Jackson CRD
21885 BROS-C049()--8J-49
584th Ave: 584th Ave Union Twp Sec. 36
Bridge Replacement
UN-3658 584th Ave
0 MI
30
53
Delaware
STP-HBP
Delaware CRD
23527 BROS-C028()--8J-28
Pioneer Rd: Hwy 38 W 0.25 MI
Bridge Replacement
Dempster Bridge
0.05 MI
70
54
Delaware
STP-HBP
Delaware CRD
4729 BROS-C028()--8J-28
197th Avenue: From 275th Street to 295th Street
Bridge Replacement
Chicken House Road Bridge 0.2 MI
55
Dubuque
STP
Dyersville
22304 STP-U-2160()--70-31
In the City of Dyersville, X49 and 1st Avenue West: Intersection of X49 and 1st Avenue West
Pavement Rehab
56
Clinton
STP
Clinton CRD
20307 STP-S-C023()--5E-23
Y34: From Lost Nation South to Murray's Corner West Pavement Rehab
57
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
481 BRFN--136()--39-23
58
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
498 BRFN--52()--39-49
59
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
501 BRFN--30()--39-23
60
NHPP
DOT-D06-RPA08
21988 NHSX--20()--3H-28
2017
IA136: MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN CLINTON (STATE SHARE) US52: MISSISSIPPI RIVER AT SABULA (STATE SHARE) US30: MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN CLINTON (STATE SHARE) US20: DYERSVILLE INTERCHANGE BETWEEN330TH AVE AND 332ND AVE
Bridge Painting
Bridge Rehabilitation
70
0 Y34-E63-Y44
Bridge paint
Grade and Pave,Bridge New,Right of Way
86
6.92 MI
0
0 MI
20
0 MI
7323
0 MI
420
0.2
350
2017
2017
Delaware
STP-HBP
Delaware CRD
16826 BROS-C028()--8J-28
265th Street: From 310th Avenue to 300th Avenue
Bridge Replacement
265th St. Bridge
0.03 MI
40
62
Delaware
STP-HBP
Delaware CRD
19147 BROS-C028()--8J-28
190TH AVE: From 165th Street to 150th Street
Bridge Replacement
Hermann Pony Truss
0.01 MI
70
63
Dubuque
STP-HBP
Dubuque CRD
21725 BROS-C031(B807)--8J-31
BOCKENSTEDT RD: Over MAQUOKETA RIVER
Bridge Replacement
Bridge #807
0 MI
80
64
Jackson
STP-HBP
Jackson CRD
21843 BRS-C049()--60-49
E29: Bridge on Division Street N. of hwy 64
Bridge Replacement
Monmouth bridge
0.024 MI 0 MI
20
0 MI
250
0 MI
550
0 MI
335
65
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
20855 BRFN--52()--39-49
66
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
25278 BRFN--020()--39-28
US20: ABANDONED RR 0.4 MI W OF IA 38 (WB)
67
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
25282 BRFN--052()--39-49
68
PRF
DOT-D06-RPA08
25284 BRFN--061()--39-49
Bridge Deck Overlay
US52: MAQUOKETA RIVER 3.2 MI S OF CO RD Bridge Deck Overlay Z34 US61: SOUTH FORK MAQUOKETA RIVER 0.5 MI N Bridge Deck Overlay OF IA 64 (NB)
9
2017
61
Bridge Replacement,Right US52: MISSISSIPPI RIVER OVERFLOW INSABULA of Way
1
0
RPA 8 Final FY 2014-2017 Transportation Improvement Program Map TPMS NUMBERS ON MAP CORRESPOND WITH TPMS NUMBERS ON SPREADSHEET Prepared by ECIA 05-01-14 The preparation of this map was financed in part through federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and/or Federal Transit Administration.
Regional Planning Affiliation 8 (FY 2014-2017 Transportation Improvement Program) FY 2014 ( October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014) NO
Fund(s)
1
5311
2
Sponsor
Expense
Prj. Type
Obj. Type
Unit #
TRANSIT Desc
Add Ons
FY14_Ttl
FY15_Ttl
FY16_Ttl
FY17_Ttl
FY14_FA
FY15
1391
Operations Misc
Other
General Operations
831,142
0
0
0
415,571
STA, 5311, 5317, Region 5316 8 / RTA
1408
Operations Other
Other
Operations
740,099
740,099
740,099
0
263,114
26
3
5316
Region 8 / RTA
2229
Operations Replacement
Other
JARC Mobility Coordinator Funding
133,032
133,032
0
0
110,860
11
4
5339
Region 8 / RTA
1833
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 601
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
80,000
0
0
0
68,000
5
5339
Region 8 / RTA
1834
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 102
Light Duty Bus (176" wb) LD 17610/3 (A)
80,000
0
0
0
68,000
6
5339
Clinton
1406
Capital
Expansion
Other
Vehicle hoist / Equipment
41,200
0
0
0
32,960
7
5339
Region 8 / RTA
2868
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 650
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
80,000
0
0
0
68,000
8
5339
Region 8 / RTA
2869
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 469
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
80,000
0
0
0
68,000
9
5339
Clinton
3009
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 00-51
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
94,000
0
0
0
79,900
10
5339
Clinton
3010
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 0150 / 563
Light Duty Bus (158" wb)
87,000
0
0
0
72,210
11
5339
Clinton
3011
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 0640
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
101,000
0
0
0
83,830
12
5339
Clinton
3012
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 9743
Heavy Duty Bus (35-39 ft.)
405,000
0
0
0
344,250
13
5339
Region 8 / RTA
2870
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 945
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
0
80,000
0
0
0
6
14
5339
Clinton
1407
Capital
Replacement
Other
0
75,000
0
0
0
6
15
5339
Clinton
1400
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
0
87,000
0
0
0
7
16
5339
Clinton
1405
Capital
Expansion
Other
0
300,000
0
0
0
24
17
5339
Region 8 / RTA
1835
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 726
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
0
80,000
0
0
0
6
18
5339
Region 8 / RTA
1417
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 470
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
0
80,000
0
0
0
6
19
5339
Region 8 / RTA
2459
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 004
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
0
80,000
0
0
0
6
20
5339
Region 8 / RTA
2461
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 007
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
0
80,000
0
0
0
6
21
5339
Region 8 / RTA
2462
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 005
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
0
0
80,000
0
0
22
5339
Region 8 / RTA
2460
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 006
New Project
0
0
80,000
0
0
23
5339
Region 8 / RTA
2871
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 384
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
0
0
80,000
0
0
Region 8 / RTA
2885
Capital
Misc
Other
60,000
0
0
0
0
24
Clinton
Transit #
IOWA
Diesel, VSS, Low Floor, BioDiesel Diesel, VSS, Low Floor, BioDiesel Diesel, VSS, Low Floor, BioDiesel Diesel, UFRC, VSS, Low Floor, BioDiesel VSS
Dispatching software Unit#: 00-51
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
Diesel, UFRC, VSS
GPS Technology/AVL Locator
On-site Mechanic/Maintenance
Operations & Maintenance (O&M) The result of major oversight nationally has lead to the requirement to include operations and maintenance/management costs of all federal-aid system routes and transit facilities in the STIPs, TIPs, and LRTPs. The Iowa FHWA asked MPOs and RPAs in Iowa to report O&M costs as system-wide totals for operations and maintenance (highways) and operations and maintenance (transit facilities).* This would encompass all the federal aid system routes, transit facilities, and the local systems for RPA 8 jurisdictions. The local O&M revenue data is provided by County Engineers Association. The O&M information is collected by County Engineers Association through the road use tax finance reports that cities and counties submit to them.
Operations Maintenance Operations Maintenance Operations Maintenance Operations Maintenance Operations Maintenance Operations Maintenance Operations Maintenance Operations Maintenance
RPA 8 Members Federal aid Operations & Maintenance Miles 2015 2016 2017 Clinton County (revenue for each year $6,033,722) $667,914 $694,631 $722,416 1,008 $2,097,075 $2,180,958 $2,268,197 City of Clinton (revenue for each year $10,803,897) $73,538 $76,480 $79,539 157 $536,654 $558,120 $580,445 City of DeWitt (revenue for each year $4,827,728) $27,797 $28,909 $30,065 36 $112,757 $117,267 $121,958 Delaware County (revenue for each year $6,788,547) $582,901 $606,217 $630,466 908 $1,579,329 $1,642,502 $1,708,202 City of Manchester (revenue for each year $3,378,740) $55,411 $57,628 $59,933 34 $137,799 $143,311 $149,043 Dubuque County (revenue for each year $11,827,932) $1,309,807 $1,362,199 $1,416,687 723 $2,757,812 $2,868,124 $2,982,849 Jackson County (revenue for each year $4,886,347) $919,549 $956,331 $994,585 829 $2,007,481 $2,087,780 $2,171,291 City of Maquoketa (revenue for each year $1,330,174) $101,408 $105,464 $109,682 36 $95,081 $98,885 $102,840 RPA 8 (revenue for each year $49,877,087) $3,738,325 $3,887,858 $4,043,373 3,730 $9,323,988 $9,696,947 $10,084,825
2018 $751,312 $2,358,925 $82,720 $603,663 $31,268 $126,836 $655,685 $1,776,530 $62,330 $155,005 $1,473,354 $3,102,163 $1,034,368 $2,258,143 $114,070 $106,954
Operations $4,205,108 Maintenance $10,488,218 Process Explanation: The 2013 Revenue, Operations and Maintenance numbers are provided by IADOT for each county and City Staff used 4% inflation for each year for spending and projected the 2013 numbers to 2018 Staff used 0% inflation for revenue and projected the 2013 numbers to 2018 RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 14
Fund Availability Iowa STP Program Adopted STP Fund Distribution System At the October 19, 1999 meeting, the RPA Policy Board adopted a distribution system for uncommitted STP funds. In this system, the funds are distributed by a sub-allocation process. Each jurisdiction’s share of the funds will be determined by the Census population. The cities of Clinton, Manchester, Maquoketa and Dewitt will receive a share based on the population within the incorporated limits of the city. The four counties will each receive a share based on the population of the unincorporated area plus the population of all cities in the county under 5,000 population. Jurisdictions eligible for STP funds that do not receive a sub-allocation will have the opportunity to request funding from the county as follows: 1. Cities below 5,000 population, transit agencies can compete each year through an application process for 10% of the STP funds set aside by RPA Policy board (Appendix D). 2. Transit agencies providing service within cities greater than 5,000 in population can request funds from the cities over 5,000 population. Based on this distribution system, the eight eligible jurisdictions would receive the following shares of uncommitted STP funds: 2010 Census Anticipated Anticipated Anticipated Anticipated Population Suballoc FFY2015 FFY2016 FFY2017 FFY2018 Share Multiplier Target(2) Target(2) Target(2) Target(2) using 2010 using 2010 using 2010 using 2010 2010 Census census census census census Per Capita Sub Allocations Before taking Funds from top
$2,551,411
$2,551,000
$2,551,000
$2,551,000
RPA Planning by ECIA Staff Small cities
-$52,300 -$249,911
-$52,300 -$249,870
-$52,300 -$249,870
-$52,300 -$249,870
Sub allocation amount
$2,249,200
$2,248,830
$2,248,830
$2,248,830
$361,192 $268,827 $396,609 $292,794 $574,289 $113,683 $110,628 $131,178
$361,133 $268,783 $396,543 $292,746 $574,194 $113,664 $110,610 $131,156
$361,133 $268,783 $396,543 $292,746 $574,194 $113,664 $110,610 $131,156
$361,133 $268,783 $396,543 $292,746 $574,194 $113,664 $110,610 $131,156
Clinton County Delaware County Dubuque County Jackson County City of Clinton City of DeWitt City of Manchester City of Maquoketa
16,909 12,585 18,567 13,707 26,885 5,322 5,179 6,141
16.06% 11.95% 17.63% 13.02% 25.53% 5.05% 4.92% 5.83%
Total Population In RPA 8 105,295 (1) FFY2015-2018 targets are based on the new regional area boundary and
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 15
All project cost are developed using year of expenditure dollars. The RPA 8 use 4% inflation rate which is determined by RPA 8 technical board for year of expenditure costs. UnProgrammed Flex Balance FY 2014 Q2* $10,064,049 2014 $5,205,200 $4,858,849 2015 $2,551,411 $55,940 $3,127,770 $4,338,430 2016 $2,551,000 $110,000 $1,161,000 $5,838,430 2017 $2,551,000 $110,000 $260,000 $8,239,430 2018 $2,551,000 $110,000 $900,000 $10,000,430 *Balance has been adjusted based on project changes occurring since the most recent Qrtly report TAP
Federal Fiscal Year
STP Target
Target Programmed
Projects Programmed in TIP & STIP FFY2014 FFY2015
FFY2016 FFY2017 FFY2018 ECIA RPA Planning $52,300 Clinton Travel Demand Model $4,000 Maquoketa Travel Demand Model $1,500 City of clinton 19th Ave North Phase III $1,200,000 Clinton County Y34: From Lost Nation South to Murray's Corner $897,000 West 292nd Street: From County Line to Hwy 67 $900,000 Dubuque County Y14 City of Farley to City of Cascade $4,400,000 Delaware County C-64/155TH ST: From Greeley to Petersburg $440,000 City of Manchester S 5TH ST: From South 5th -Enterprise Ave to Grant $531,000 Jackson County Y31, from 234th Street to Dubuque Coun $680,000 City of Maquoketa Quarry $548,000 Main Street TEAP Study $20,000 Small City Projects 9th AVE: From Anamos rd to HWY 67 $100,000 RTA Security Cameras $59,770 Y44/Davenport Street $31,200 X 49 and 1st Avenue West Intersection $264,000 1st Avenue West Bridge Deck Overlay $260,000 Bridge and Culvert Replacement on south Main St $265,200 Total $5,205,200 $3,127,770 $1,161,000 $260,000 $900,000 Note: The Local STP balance numbers will not match with overall program funds numbers as STP projects from IADOT will not be consider in RPA 8 STP funds. Note: There are few project programmed for FY 17 and 18 as local entities are accumulating STP funds to do a major project in future years.
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 16
Transportation Alternative Program (TAP) and Transportation Alternative (TA) flex The Transportation Alternatives Program was authorized by the most recent federal transportation funding act, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), which was signed into law on July 6, 2012. TAP redefines the former Transportation Enhancements activities and consolidates these eligibilities with the former Safe Routes to School program. Some projects that were previously funded through the discretionary National Scenic Byways Program are now eligible for TAP as are projects eligible under the Recreational Trails Program. The Transportation Enhancements program was originally authorized in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and continued through two successive laws, Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) and Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). On Jan. 15, 2013, the Iowa Transportation Commission approved the implementation of MAP-21 as it relates to TAP. After much consideration and through the gathering of stakeholder and general public input, the decision was made to transition to a more locally focused manner of selecting projects for funding. Under SAFETEA-LU, the Iowa DOT retained half of the annual Transportation Enhancements apportionment and selected Statewide Transportation Enhancement projects through a competitive process. The other half of the Transportation Enhancements apportionment was distributed to Iowa’s MPOs and RPAs to select projects locally. Under MAP-21, the majority of Transportation Alternatives Program funding will be distributed to the MPOs and RPAs while the Iowa DOT retains just $1 million for the implementation of the Statewide Transportation Alternatives Program. TA Flex, the Iowa Transportation commission approved some STP funds to bring the TAP funding levels to SAFTEA-LU TE funding levels. The IA DOT commission gave an option to MPOs and RPA s on usage of TA flex funds. RPA 8 Policy Board decided to use the funds on infrastructure maintenance. The RPA 8 staff is in process of creating an application process for TAP funds. ECIA staff will open the application process once the RPA policy Boards approves and adopted the procedure for the funding of the RPA’s TAP funds. TAP funds will follow the same process as they followed with TE funds for solicitation of applications. In this system, funds will be awarded by a competitive process. The ECIA staff distributes a letter of solicitation to all RPA member governments and County Conservation Boards. Applications are then mailed to the entities. ECIA staff performs the initial scoring based on criteria, which is then reviewed by the RPA Technical Advisory Committee. The Technical Advisory Committee then makes their recommendations to the RPA Policy Board. The Policy Board then holds a public hearing in which comments from the public are heard concerning the applications. After the public hearing, the Policy Board then awards funds to the projects they deem to be most worthy. ECIA programs these funds for the four-year period of the TIP based upon funding targets from the Iowa DOT and projected funding levels. The request for funding by applicants will be limited by amount. The RPA 8 Policy Board will be setting up these limits.
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 17
UnProgrammed Balance FY 2014 Q2* $868,945 2014 $146,415 $111,854 $678,318 $448,896 2015 $144,856 $57,060 $306,533 $344,279 2016 $145,000 $0 $0 $489,279 2017 $145,000 $0 $0 $634,279 2018 $145,000 $0 $0 $779,279 *Balance has been adjusted based on project changes occurring since the most recent Qrtly report Federal Fiscal Year
TAP
TPA Flex
Target Programmed
Projects Programmed in TIP & STIP FFY2014 FFY2015 FFY2016 1ST Ave Trail Project $190,718 Bellevue Riverview Trail: Phase II $250,000 2012 Washington Boulevard/ MRT $237,600 West Marion Street Trail $155,124 Riverfront Trail Extension $151,409 Total $678,318 $306,533 $0
FFY2017
FFY2018
$0
$0
Overall Program Funding The tables below provide the program of funds by year in each funding category. Funding Programs National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) Primary Road Fund Surface Transportation Program STP Bridge Program Transportation Alternatives Program Total
FY 15 Total Fed Aid
Programmed Amounts in 1,000 FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 Total Fed Aid Total Fed Aid Total Fed Aid
$ 16,552 $ 13,242 $ $ 4,680 $
328 $
- $ 36,920 $
- $
- $
- $ 11,516 $
-
- $ 2,346 $
- $ 8,845 $
-
260 $ 1,300 $
900
$ 4,892 $ 3,128 $ 2,170 $ 1,161 $
386 $
$ 2,705 $ 2,164 $ 2,875 $ 2,300 $ 1,350 $ 1,080 $ $
401 $
306 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
950 $
760
- $
-
$ 29,230 $ 18,840 $ 42,293 $ 3,461 $ 4,082 $ 1,340 $ 22,611 $ 1,660
Federal funding Projects identified in local TIPs utilize a number of different sources of federal funding. While some FHWA funds are distributed by statutory formulas, other funds are “discretionary� (congressionally earmarked). The primary sources of FHWA funding to Iowa, which are in part used to fund local efforts, include:
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 18
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) – CMAQ provides flexible funding for transportation projects and programs tasked with helping to meet the requirements of the Clean AirAct. These projects can include those that reduce congestion and improve air quality. Demonstration funding (DEMO) - Demonstration funding is a combination of different programs and sources. The FHWA administers discretionary programs through various offices representing special funding categories. An appropriation bill providing money to a discretionary program, through special congressionally directed appropriations, or through legislative acts such as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) - This is a core federal-aid program that funds projects with the goal of achieving a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roads. Portions of these funds are set aside for use on high-risk rural roads and railway-highway crossings. Metropolitan Planning Program (PL) - FHWA provides funding for this program to the State of Iowa based on urbanized area population. The funds are dedicated to support transportation planning efforts in urbanized areas of more than 50,000 persons. National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) - NHPP funds are available to be used on projects that improve the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS) including some state and U.S. highways and interstates. Surface Transportation Program (STP) - This program is designed to address specific issues identified by Congress and provides flexible funding for project to preserve or improve the condition/performance of number of transportation facilities including any federal-aid highway or public road bridge. STP funding may be spent on: • Roadway projects on federal-aid routes. • Bridge projects on any public road. • Transit capital improvements. • TAP eligible activities. • Planning activities. STP Bridge Program (STP-B) – While the Highway Bridge Program was eliminated in MAP-21 a portion of Iowa’s STP will continue to be targeted directly to counties and dedicated specifically to county bridge projects. A portion of these funds are required to be obligated on off-system bridges. The remaining funds can be used on either on or off system bridges. Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) - This program combines funding from a number of programs in the previous authorization bill, SAFETEA-LU. The TAP program provides funding to expand travel choices and improve the transportation experience. TAP projects improve the cultural, historic, aesthetic and environmental aspects of our transportation infrastructure. Alternatives projects can include creation of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and the restoration of historic transportation facilities, among others. It is important to note that some types of projects eligible under the SAFETEALU program Transportation Enhancements are no longer eligible, or have modified eligibility, under the TAP. All projects completed using TAP funds should be verified to ensure compatibility with TAP eligibility. RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 19
Federal Lands and Tribal Transportation Programs (FLHP) – The Federal Lands Transportation Program and Federal Lands Access Program provide funding for projects that improve access within, and to, federal lands. Federal Lands Access Program funding will be distributed through a grant process where a group of FHWA, Iowa DOT, and local government representatives will solicit, rank, and select projects to receive funding. The Tribal Transportation Program continues the Indian Reservation Road program and will distribute funds based on formula comprised of tribal population, road mileage, and average funding under SAFETEA-LU. County Bridge Program County bridges are eligible for the BR program based on their service level. For bridge replacement, a bridge must have a Federal Bridge Sufficiency rating (FBS) less than 50 , an average daily traffic (ADT) of 25 or more vehicles, and be rated as structurally deficient (SD) or functionally obsolete (FO). For bridge rehabilitation, a bridge must have an FBS of only 80 or less, an ADT of 25 or more vehicles, and be rated as SD or FO. Counties BR funds are distributed to the counties based on one-third of the Road Use Tax (RUT) distribution and two-thirds on the amount of qualifying square feet of bridges. As funds permit, the Iowa DOT allows counties to borrow up to six years of their average annual allocation. Clinton, Delaware, Dubuque and Jackson Counties in RPA 8 uses many factors when determining which bridges to replace and which bridge replacements to use federal bridge funds. Taken into account is our bridge inspection/condition/life data, traffic counts, knowledge of our systems traffic flow, road repair schedules, school bus routes, etc. We choose bridge projects that have the greatest need (which somewhat correlates with their estimated remaining life). We program projects based on the HBP funds available to us from the state (DOT) provided targets. Currently Dubuque County has a very large project in the 5-year plan that will require a higher dollar amount than our bridge funds are allowed to accumulate. City Bridge Program The City Bridge program does not automatically distribute bridge funds to cities. Rather the funds are distributed based on a combination of several factors including Sufficiency Rating, Average Daily Traffic (ADT), Detour considerations, and Bridge Posting. All applications for city bridge fund projects are ranked by a scoring system statewide. Cities should apply for this funding to get their bridge projects ranked and funded.
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 20
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Transportation Projects for FFY 2015 - 2018
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 21
Regional Planning Affiliation 8 (FY 2015-2018 Draft Transportation Improvement Program) FY 2015 ( October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015) SPONSOR
TPMS
Draft 1st of May 2014
IOWA
NO
PGM
TYPE
PN
1
ILL
City
De Witt
21031 ILL-1855()--93-23
In the City of De Witt, S 6TH AVE: From Lake st to City limits
2
ILL
City
Camanche
18705 ILL-1040()--93-23
3
ILL
City
Clinton
4
NHPP
DOT-Pgm
5
NHPP
6
Programmed Amounts in 1,000
LOCATION
FY 15 TOTAL
TYPE WORK Pave
FY 15 RGNL
FY 15 FA
FY 16 TOTAL
FY 16 RGNL
FY 16 FA
FY 17 TOTAL
FY 17 RGNL
FY 17 FA
FY 18 TOTAL
FY 18 RGNL
FY 18 FA
GRAND TOTAL
$
1,800
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
1,800
In the City of Camanche, WASHINGTON BLVD: From Hwy 67 to Hwy 67
$
4,960
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
4,960
21099 ILL-1415()--93-23
In the City of Clinton, 44th Ave S: Union Specific Rail rd main line N 0 MI to Drop/Pole yard in Lincoln way rail park
$
3,200
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
3,200
DOT-D06-RPA08
29555 NHSX--003()--3H-31
003: TOLLGATE RD (CO RD Y13) TO E JCT PFEILER RD Grade and Pave
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
- $
11,516 $
9,213
$
-
$
11,516
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
21988 NHSX--20()--3H-28
US 20: DYERSVILLE INTERCHANGE BETWEEN330TH AVE AND 332 AVE
Grade and Pave,Bridge New,Right of Way
$
16,552 $
13,242
$
-
$
328
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
16,880
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
29559 BRFN--062()--39-49
062: LITTLE MILL CREEK, 0.2 MI S OFCO RD D61
Bridge Deck Overlay
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
190
$
-
$
-
$
190
7
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
29560 BRFN--062()--39-49
062: MILL CREEK, 0.1 MI S OF CO RDD61
Bridge Deck Overlay
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
250
$
-
$
-
$
250
8
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
29562 STPN--067()--2J-49
067: IA 64 INTERSECTION W OF SABULA
Grading
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
97
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
- $
97
9
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
25278 BRFN--020()--39-28
020: ABANDONED RR, 0.4 MI W OF IA 38 (WB)
Bridge Deck Overlay
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
250
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
250
10
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
25282 BRFN--052()--39-49
052: MAQUOKETA RIVER, 3.2 MI S OF CO RD Z34
Bridge Deck Overlay
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
550
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
550
11
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
25284 BRFN--061()--39-49
061: SOUTH FORK MAQUOKETA RIVER, 0.5 MI N OF IA 64 (NB)
Bridge Deck Overlay
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
335
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
335
12
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
25301 BRFN--136()--39-23
136: 2.4 MI W OF US 67 TO CHARLOTTE
Culvert Replacement,Right of Way
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
- $
1,039
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
1,039
13
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
20855 BRFN--52()--39-49
US 52: MISSISSIPPI RIVER OVERFLOW INSABULA
Bridge Replacement,Right of Way
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
20
$
-
$
- $
8,350
$
-
$
-
$
8,370
14
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
29557 BRFN--151()--39-31
151: 0.6 MI N OF CO RD Y13
Culvert Repair
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
65
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
- $
65
15
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
25249 BRFN--136()--39-23
136: IN CLINTON, OVER CAR BARN CREEK AT 10TH ST
Culvert Replacement
$
584
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
584
16
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
481
BRFN--136()--39-23
IA 136: MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN CLINTON(STATE SHARE)
Bridge Painting
$
2,020
$
-
$
-
$
20
$
-
$
-
$
20
$
-
$
-
$
20
$
-
$
-
$
2,080
17
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
498
BRFN--52()--39-49
US 52: MISSISSIPPI RIVER AT SABULA(STATE SHARE)
$
15 $
- $
-
$
15 $
- $
-
$
15 $
- $
-
$
15 $
- $
- $
60
18
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
501
BRFN--30()--39-23
US 30: MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN CLINTON(STATE SHARE) Bridge Rehabilitation
$
20 $
- $
-
$
220 $
- $
-
$
20 $
- $
-
$
20 $
- $
- $
280
19
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
29556 STPN--136()--2J-31
136: IN CASCADE, FROM 1ST AVE W TONEAR NCL
Grade and Pave
$
500
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
500
20
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
29563 STPN--052()--2J-49
052: TETE DES MORTS CREEK TO NCL OFST DONATUS
Pavement Rehab
$
600
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
600
21
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
29564 STPN--062()--2J-49
062: CO RD Y61 TO BELLEVUE
Pavement Rehab
$
390
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
390
22
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
29558 NHSN--052()--2R-31
052: 1.3 MI E OF FIVE POINTS RD/S.MOUND RD E OF RICKARDSVILLE
Grading
$
51
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
- $
51
23
PRF
DOT-Pgm
DOT-D06-RPA08
29561 BRFN--052()--39-49
052: MISSISSIPPI RIVER AT SABULA (STATE SHARE)
Bridge Replacement,Right of Way,Wetland Mitigation
$
500
$
-
$
- $
36,600
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
37,100
24
STP
CRD
Clinton CRD
23560 STP-S-C023()--5E-23
292nd Street: From County Line to Hwy 67
Pavement Rehab
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
- $
1,300
$
900
$
900
$
1,300
25
STP
City
Dyersville
29670 STP-U-2160()--70-28
1st Avenue West Bridge Deck Overlay, Over Bear Creek, from X49/332nd Ave to Beltline Rd
Bridge Deck Overlay
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
386
$
260
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
386
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 22
260
$
Regional Planning Affiliation 8 (FY 2015-2018 Draft Transportation Improveme FY 2015 ( October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015) SPONSOR
TPMS
IOWA
PGM
TYPE
26
STP
CRD
Clinton CRD
20307 STP-S-C023()--5E-23
Y34: From Lost Nation South to Murray's Corner West
Pavement Rehab
$
- $
27
STP
City
Dyersville
22304 STP-U-2160()--70-31
X49 and 1st Avenue West: Intersection of X49 and 1st Avenue West
Pavement Rehab
$
- $
28
STP
CRD
Jackson CRD
19277 STP-S-C049(60)--5E-49
Y31: From 234th Street to Dubuque County Line
Pavement Rehab
$
850 $
29
STP
PA
RPA-08
ECIA: RPA 8 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Trans Planning
$
72 $
30
STP
PA
RPA-08
22194 RGTR-PA08()--ST-31
RTA: Security Cameras for Rta Buses
Transit Investments
$
75 $
31
STP
City
Maquoketa
21345 STP-U-4742(618)--70-49
Pavement Rehab,Outside Services Engineering
$
685 $
32
STP
City
Manchester
20794 STP-U-4682(623)--70-28
Pavement Rehab
$
696 $
33
STP
City
Maquoketa
11741 STP-U-4742(IA64)--70-49
Traffic Signals
$
25 $
34
STP
City
Calamus
22303 STP-U-1015()--27-23
In the City of Calamus, Y44: From Hwy 30 to Calamus Corporate line
Pavement Rehab
$
39 $
35
STP
City
Clinton
22302 STP-U-1415(625)--70-23
In the City of Clinton, 19th Ave North Phase III: From Approx. 1100' West of Randall to N. 2nd Street
Grade and Pave
$
2,450 $
36
STP-HBP
CRD
Delaware CRD
23527 BROS-C028()--8J-28
Pioneer Rd: Hwy 38 W 0.25 MI
Bridge Replacement
$
- $
37
STP-HBP
CRD
Jackson CRD
20486 BROS-C049()--5F-49
35 ST: Over prairie Creek
Bridge Replacement
$
- $
38
STP-HBP
CRD
Jackson CRD
21843 BRS-C049()--60-49
E29: Bridge on Division Street N. of hwy 64
Bridge Replacement
$
- $
39
STP-HBP
CRD
Dubuque CRD
21725 BROS-C031(B807)--8J-31
BOCKENSTEDT RD: Over MAQUOKETA RIVER
Bridge Replacement
$
- $
40
STP-HBP
CRD
Delaware CRD
23528 BROS-C028()--5F-28
182nd St: X49 W 1 MI
Bridge Replacement
$
- $
478
PN
RGPL-PA08(RTP)--ST-00
LOCATION
In the city of Maquoketa, On Quarry St, from N 2nd St to N Olive St and Approximatly 200 Ft North & South on N Main St In the City of Manchester, S 5TH ST: From South 5th Enterprise Ave to Grant Street In the City of Maquoketa, MAIN ST: From MAIN ST TEAP Study to REPLACEMENT
TYPE WORK
FY 15 TOTAL
NO
FY 1
RPA 8 Final FY 2015-2018 Transportation Improvement Program Map TPMS NUMBERS ON MAP CORRESPOND WITH TPMS NUMBERS ON SPREADSHEET Prepared by ECIA 05-01-14 The preparation of this map was financed in part through federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and/or Federal Transit Administration.
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Transit Projects for FFY 2015 - 2018
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 26
Regional Planning Affiliation 8 (FY 2015-2018 Draft Transportation Improvement Program) FY 2015 ( October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015) NO
Fund(s)
Sponsor
Transit #
Expense
Draft 1st of May 2014
IOWA Prj. Type
Obj. Type
Unit #
TRANSIT Desc
Add Ons
Operations
FY15_Ttl $
FY16_Ttl
1
STA, 5311
Region 8 / RTA
1408
Operations
Other
Other
2
5339
Region 8 / RTA
1835
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 726
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
87,000 $
3
5339
Clinton
1400
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 00-51
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
Diesel, UFRC, VSS
$
4
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3170
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 469
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
5
5339
Region 8 / RTA
2461
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 007
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
6
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3174
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 650
7
5339
Clinton
3348
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
8
5339
Clinton
3349
Capital
Replacement
9
5339
Clinton
3350
Capital
10
5339
Clinton
3351
11
5339
Region 8 / RTA
12
5339
13
FY17_Ttl
FY15_FA
FY16_FA
FY17_FA
FY18_FA
FY15_SA
FY16_SA
FY17_SA
FY18_SA
- $
- $ 329,033 $ 329,033 $
- $
- $ 236,152 $ 236,152 $
- $
-
- $
- $
- $
73,950 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
104,000 $
- $
- $
- $
88,400 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
$
87,000 $
- $
- $
- $
73,950 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
VSS
$
87,000 $
- $
- $
- $
73,950 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
87,000 $
- $
- $
- $
73,950 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
Unit#: 0150
Light Duty Bus (158" wb)
Diesel, VSS
$
92,000 $
- $
- $
- $
78,200 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
Vehicle
Unit#: 564
Light Duty Bus (158" wb)
Diesel, VSS
$
92,000 $
- $
- $
- $
78,200 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 9743
Heavy Duty Bus (35-39 ft.)
Diesel, UFRC, VSS, Low Floor, BioDiesel
$
419,000 $
- $
- $
- $ 356,150 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 0640
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
Diesel, UFRC, VSS
$
104,000 $
- $
- $
- $
88,400 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
3270
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 999
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
89,610 $
- $
- $
- $
71,688 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
Region 8 / RTA
3271
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 348
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
89,610 $
- $
- $
- $
71,688 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
5339
Clinton
1405
Capital
Expansion
Other
GPS Technology/AVL Locator
$
- $ 300,000 $
- $
- $
- $ 240,000 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
14
5339
Clinton
1407
Capital
Replacement
Other
Dispatching software
$
- $
75,000 $
- $
- $
- $
60,000 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
15
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3169
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 601
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
89,610 $
- $
- $
- $
71,688 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
16
5339
Region 8 / RTA
1417
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 470
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
89,610 $
- $
- $
- $
71,688 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
17
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3276
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 960
Conversion Van
$
- $
51,500 $
- $
- $
- $
43,775 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
18
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3171
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 094
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
92,299 $
- $
- $
- $
73,839 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
19
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3172
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 102
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
92,299 $
- $
- $
- $
73,839 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
20
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3173
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 143
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
92,299 $
- $
- $
- $
73,839 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
21
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3266
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 9142
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
92,299 $
- $
- $
- $
73,839 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
22
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3267
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 9144
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
92,299 $
- $
- $
- $
73,839 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
792,685 $ 792,685 $
FY18_Ttl
Page 27
Regional Planning Affiliation 8 (FY 2015-2018 Draft Transportation Improvement Program) FY 2015 ( October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015) NO
Fund(s)
Sponsor
Transit #
Expense
IOWA Prj. Type
Obj. Type
Unit #
Desc
Add Ons
FY15_Ttl
FY16_Ttl
FY17_Ttl
FY18_Ttl
23
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3268
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 998
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
92,299 $
-
24
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3274
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 485
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
92,299 $
-
25
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3275
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 486
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
92,299 $
-
26
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3263
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 384
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
- $
95,068
27
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3264
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 114
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
- $
95,068
28
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3265
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 113
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
- $
95,068
29
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3269
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 440
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
- $
95,068
30
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3272
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 4483
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
- $
95,068
31
5339
Region 8 / RTA
3273
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 4484
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
- $
95,068
32
5339
Region 8 / RTA
2462
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 005
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
- $
95,068
33
5339
Region 8 / RTA
2870
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 945
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
- $
95,068
34
5339
Region 8 / RTA
2459
Capital
Replacement
Vehicle
Unit#: 004
Light Duty Bus (176" wb)
VSS
$
- $
- $
- $
95,068
35
Region 8 / RTA
3223
Capital
Other
Other
Maintenance Software
$
30,000 $
- $
- $
-
36
Region 8 / RTA
3224
Capital
Other
Other
Computer Equipment
$
10,000 $
- $
- $
-
RPA 8 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM
Accommodation: Meetings, public hearings, and ECIA formal events are held in facilities that are accessible by persons with disabilities. Public notices of ECIA meetings and events include a notice of location for public. Individuals with disabilities will be provided with accommodations to attend the meetings on request with a minimum of one weeks notice. Individuals requiring special material or presentation formats will be asked to contact the staff at least one week before the meeting.
Revising/Amending an Approved TIP Revising the TIP Revisions are defined as changes to a TIP that occur between scheduled periodic updates. There are two types of changes that occur under the umbrella of revision. The first is a major revision or “Amendment”. The second is a minor revision or Administrative Modification”. Amendment An amendment is a revision to a TIP that involves a major change to a project included in the TIP. This includes an addition or deletion of a project or a major change in project cost, project/project phase initiation dates, or a major change in design concept or scope (e.g. changing project termini or the number of through lanes). Changes to projects that are included only for illustrative purposes do not require an amendment. An amendment is a revision that requires public review and comment, redemonstration of fiscal constraint, or a conformity determination. Changes that affect fiscal constraint must take place by amendment of the TIP. The TIP Amendment Process will include the following steps: • •
• • •
RPA 8 staff will collect the amendment information from the members requesting. RPA 8 staff will inform the public of the amended TIP’s availability by sending notice to the organizations on the RPA 8 public participation process list and by publishing legal notices in local newspapers and ECIA website. Theses notices will be posted and published 4-20 days before the scheduled meeting. The public hearing meeting will be held with the RPA 8 Policy Board meeting and the meeting will be opened for public input during the process. The DOT and FHWA staff will be provided with updated TIP with amendments once approved by RPA 8 Policy and tech boards. The public hearing meeting will be held with the RPA 8 Policy Board meeting and the meeting will be opened for public input during the process.
Administrative Modification A minor revision to a TIP is an administrative modification. It includes minor changes/project phase costs, minor changes to funding sources of previously-included projects, and minor changes to
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 29
project/project phase initiation dates. An administrative modification is a revision that does not require public review and comment or redemonstration of fiscal constraint, Amendment vs. Administrative Modification There are four main components that can be used to determine whether a project change constitutes an amendment or an administrative modification. They include the following: •
Project costs-Determination will be made based on the percentage change or dollar amount of change in federal aid. Projects in which the federal aid has been changed by more than 30% or total federal aid increases by $2.0 million or more will require an amendment. Anything less can be processed with an administrative modification.
•
Schedule changes-Changes in schedules to projects which are included in the first four years of the TIP/STIP will be considered administrative modifications. Projects which are added or deleted from the TIP/STIP will be processed as amendments.
•
Funding sources-Additional federal funding sources to a project will require an amendment. Changes to funding from one source to another will require an administrative modification.
•
Scope changes-Changing project termini or changing the amount of through traffic lanes will be processed as an amendment. Other examples of changes that require amendment are changing the type of work from an overlay to reconstruction. Another example is changing a project to include widening of the roadway.
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 30
Resolution ECIA Regional Planning Affiliation FFY 2015-2018 Transportation Improvement Program WHEREAS, the ECIA–RPA Transportation Improvement Program information is developed as a description and justification of transportation improvements proposed for Federal Fiscal years of 2015 through 2018; and, WHEREAS, the East Central Intergovernmental Association Regional Planning Affiliation has been formed in cooperation with the Iowa Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, and the Federal Transit Administration to jointly plan and program federal and state transportation improvements in the Region; and, WHEREAS, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act makes available federal highway and transit funding to make improvements in the State of Iowa and the ECIA–RPA region; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ECIA Regional Planning Affiliation that the FFY 2015–2018 Transportation Improvement Program is hereby approved.
Adopted this on 26th of June 2014.
__________________________ Larry Buck Koos Chair, RPA Policy Board
____________________ Date
ATTEST:
___________________________ Kelley Deutmeyer Executive Director, ECIA
_____________________ Date
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 31
Appendix D General RPA Funding Guide to Transportation Surface Transportation Projects The Regional Planning Affiliation (RPA) tech Committee oversees the program that provides funds to sponsors of transportation projects that expand travel choices and enhance the transportation experience. This committee reviews, scores, and recommends project applications requesting Surface Transportation Project (STP) funds. Their recommendations are given to the RPA Policy Committee for approval. The committee consists of a rotating balance of local government and public works officials in the region. The RPA Tech committee follows the rules and regulations pertaining to the program as set forth in the Federal Highway Administration. However, some additional restrictions have been placed to make the program more efficient and maximize the federal dollars used for construction activities.
Project Obligation: The project should be obligated within two Federal Fiscal years which includes the Federal Fiscal year that the funding got programmed in RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The Federal Fiscal year starts on October 1st of the current calendar year and goes until September 30th of the next calendar year. If funds have not been obligated at the end of the two year time period the funds will be returned to RPA 8.
FHWA Authorization of Construction Costs As part of the letting process, the Iowa DOT obtains FHWA Authorization for the costs of the proposed construction contract. FHWA Authorization will be requested based on the plans, specifications, and estimate (PS&E) submitted by the Local Public Agency (LPA). If the bids come in significantly higher or lower than the estimate, the FHWA Authorization may be adjusted accordingly, provided that sufficient Federal funds are available for the project. The Iowa DOT requires that the LPA budget sufficient funds and be prepared to award a contract for bids that are up to 110% of the LPA’s estimate. Please see below for FEDERAL AID PROJECT DEVELOPMENT GUIDE http://www.iowadot.gov/local_systems/publications/im/guide.pdf
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM EVALUATION CRITERIA
1. Economic Vitality: 275 Points (27.5%) 4. System Preservation: 200 Points (20%) 2. Safety: 200 Points (20%) RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 32
3. Accessibility and Mobility: 125 Points (12.5%) 5. Integration and Connectivity: 75 Points (7.5%) 6. Local and Regional Factors: 125 Points (12.5%) TOTAL POINTS AVAILABLE: 1000 (100%)
The process for project prioritization and ratings will be the following: 1. Projects are submitted to RPA 8, with all required information no later than final submittal date set by RPA 8, December 3, 2010 by 5:00 PM. 2. Applications will be compiled for the Subcommittee for STP funding distribution. The Subcommittee will then meet and rank the projects based on the evaluation criteria adopted by the Board. The subcommittee will submit the list to RPA 8 Tech and Policy Boards. 3. The Tech Board will provide their input to Policy Board. The Policy Board will review the ranking list and associated documentation and prepare a draft Transportation Improvement Program for inclusion into the Iowa State Transportation Improvement Program. Please refer to the Application Guide for additional information on scoring criteria. EVALUATION CRITERIA This section will provide information specifically for the competitive rating section of the Region 8 STP Application. The information is ordered by rating criteria developed from the MAP-21 planning factors that are meant to guide federal-aid projects funded by MAP-21 legislation. The Transportation Advisory Committee will rank the projects according to subjective and objective scoring factors. All scores will be sent to the Policy Board for review and TIP construction. ECONOMIC VITALITY 275 Total Points Available The Economic Vitality section of the application is designed to measure the economic impact that a proposed project will have locally and regionally. All of the rating in this section is subjective. Members of the Transportation Advisory Committee will rate the effects that the proposed project will have on the rating criteria based on the merits of the project. Below illustrates how the 275 points are distributed for each project: 75 Points - Project promotes general economic development. 40 Points - Project specifically enhances or improves tourism. 40 Points - Project specifically improves or enhances movement of freight and services. 40 Points - Project improves or enhances movement of workers. RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 33
40 Points - Project improves access to jobs and business opportunities. 40 Points - Project improves access to other transportation facilities including air, water, rail, multimodal, etc. SYSTEM PRESERVATION 200 Total Points Available Points are awarded based on current surface type, current pavement condition, current AADT, and future AADT. The information for each of the previously mentioned categories is plugged into a formula and the point value is determined by where the formula solution fits into the points range. Below is an example of how the system preservation formula may be applied to a proposed project: 1) Surface Type: Portland Concrete 1 2) Facility Condition: 2 3) Existing AADT: 5,800 4) 10-year projected AADT: 6,400 Formula 1: [(Existing AADT + 10 Year AADT)/1000/2] Formula 2: [(Formula 1 Answer/2)*(Surface Type)*(Facility Condition)] Formula 1: [(5,800 + 6,400)/1,000/2] = 6.1 Formula 2: [(6.1/2)*(1)*(2)]= 6.1 = Project awarded 52 Points as shown in the table below System Preservation Scoring Criteria Range Range Points <.50 0.51-1.00 1.01-1.50 1.51-2.00 2.01-2.50 2.51-3.00 3.01-3.50 3.51-4.00 4.01-4.50 4.51-5.00 5.01-5.50 5.51-6.00 6.01-6.50 6.51-7.00 7.01-7.50 7.51-8.00 8.01-8.50 8.51-9.00 9.01-9.50
4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76
12.51-13.00 13.01-13.50 13.51-14.00 14.01-14.50 14.51-15.00 15.01-15.50 15.51-16.00 16.01-16.50 16.51-17.00 17.01-17.50 17.51-18.00 18.01-18.50 18.51-19.00 19.01-19.50 19.51-20.00 20.01-20.50 20.51-21.00 21.01-21.50 21.51-22.00
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Points 104 108 112 116 120 124 128 132 136 140 144 148 152 156 160 164 168 172 176 Page 34
9.51-10.00 10.01-10.50 10.51-11.00 11.01-11.50 11.51-12.00 12.01-12.50
80 84 88 92 96 100
22.01-22.50 22.51-23.00 23.01-23.50 23.51-24.00 24.01-24.50 24.51-25.00
180 184 188 192 196 200
SAFETY 200 Total Points Available Safety is designed to measure how accidents on the proposed facility compare with state rates and what proportion of the project cost will go towards safety improvements. The Transportation Advisory Committee will rank projects based on factual numbers supplied by applicants and their corresponding point ranges. Data used in this section includes accident rates and cost of safety improvements of the proposed project. Applicants will acquire accident data from the previous five years and complete the accident rate calculation located in the application. The end result should be a ratio in units of accidents per hundred million vehicle miles (HMVM) of the calculated rate for the proposed project to the state rate for cities or counties. Points will be awarded based on the accident rate as shown in the table below: Accident Rate Scoring Criteria Accident Ratio Points <0.49 0.50-0.99 1.00-1.99 2.00-2.99 3.00-3.99 4.00-<
0 20 40 60 80 100
The proportion of the total project cost to cost of safety improvements uses data from the applicant that should specifically describe what parts of the project are for safety improvements. All safety improvements must be located on the approved safety improvement list included at the end of this document and in the STP Application. The cost for safety improvements should then be divided by the total cost for the safety improvement cost/total cost ratio. Points are awarded based on the proportion of funding put towards making safety improvements as shown below. Safety Improvement Scoring Criteria Percent Points <15% 15-25% 25-35% 35-45%
0 20 40 60
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 35
45-55% 55-65% ACCESSIBILITY
AND
80 100
MOBILITY
125 Total Points Available Accessibility and Mobility is designed to measure how the proposed project will make users of the transportation system more mobile. The Transportation Advisory Committee will rank the projects based on factual numbers supplied by the applicants or RPA 8 and their corresponding point ranges. RPA 8 will calculate volume/capacity ratios by dividing current and projected traffic volumes by a capacity table developed from the Highway Capacity Manual. This table may be found on the Page 17. Points will be awarded based on Existing Volume/Capacity Ratio using the scoring criteria in the table below. Existing Volume/Capacity Ratio Scoring Criteria Volume/Capacity Points 0.00-0.062 0.063-0.125 0.126-0.188 0.189-0.251 0.252-0.314 0.315-0.503 0.504-0.629 0.630-0.818 0.819-0.944 0.945-1.070 1.071-1.096
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 65
Points will be awarded for projects in which the volume/capacity ratio is reduces due to the proposed project. Points will be awarded based on the following table. Volume/Capacity Reduction Scoring Criteria Volume/Capacity Points Ranges Change 0 0 1 20 2 40 3 60
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 36
Volume Capacity Table
RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 37
INTEGRATION
AND
CONNECTIVITY
75 Points Total Points Available Integration and Connectivity is designed to measure what impact the proposed project will have on connecting and integrating the transportation system. The Transportation Advisory Committee will rank projects based on factual numbers and on the committee memberâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s feelings on how the proposed project will impact the transportation system in this category. Below illustrates how the 75 points are distributed for the integration and connectivity category. 75 Points - Project improves connectivity to a road classified as arterial or higher? 75 Points - Project improves connectivity for freight transportation including air, water, rail, and truck? 75 Points - Project integrates multiple modes of transportation including transit, trail, and auto? LOCAL
AND
REGIONAL FACTORS
125 Total Points Available Local and regional factors will evaluate what planning documents the proposed project are consistent with, the amount of local match involved, how the proposed project will impact the transportation system, and if there is more than one sponsor involved. The adopted planning document could include a long range transportation plan, comprehensive plan, capital improvements plan, or any other local, regional, or state planning document. 25 points will be awarded based on the number of planning documents in which a project conforms with and the significance of the planning document. Projects will be awarded points based on the amount of local match ratio contributed to the project. Projects that have match ratios in between the ratios listed as point ranges will be grouped in the point range above the actual ratio. For instance, if a proposed project has a federal/local match of 72/28, that project will be grouped in the 80/20 range. A proposed project that has a federal/local match ratio of 68/32 will be grouped in the 70/30 range. Local Match Ratio Scoring Criteria Fed/Local Match
Points
80/20 0 70/30 8.25 60/40 16.75 50/50 25 In addition, points will be awarded based on the following questions: 25 Points - Project will contribute to the local AND regional transportation system. 25 Points - Proposed project involves more than one project sponsor. RPA 8 Transportation Improvement Program FFY 2015-2018
Page 38