NASAO
State Aviation Journal Summer 2017
Busy on the Hill NASAO’s Full Court Press on Congress Draws Attention to State Priorities
In Focus
Florida Office of Aviation and Spaceports Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Page 1
On the Cover
Contents
Working the Hill - In the halls of Longworth House Office Building. Photo by Kim Stevens
Commentary From the Publisher
Page 3
On the Horizon: An Expanded Role for States in UTM
Page 4
NBAA Remains Stedfast in Combating National, Local Access Challenges
Page 6
From the President
Page 8
Feature Articles Barry Cooper Retires from FAA
Page 10
Hill Visits, Strong Line-up Key to Successful NASAO Legislative Conference Page 22 FAA Administrator Michael Huerta Extends NASAO MOU On the Hill - Representing States Top Priority for NASAO
Page 2
Airport Inspection Training Tucson and Ryan Field Host Class
Page 32
Colorado Aeronautics Receives Innovator Award
Page 36
Focus on Florida Aviation Gary Stevens - Retirement in the Sunshine State
Page 13
Page 27
Florida Invests $1 Billion in Airports
Page 16
Page 28
Aviation and Spaceports Office Touts Progressive Airports System
Page 18
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Summer 2017
From the Publisher
New Partnership, New Growth, New Opportunities As you read this issue of the State Aviation Journal, the changes will be subtle. But those
changes mark the beginning of what promises to be the next step in the evolution of what started as a dream some forty years ago. My idea to create an aviation publication germinated while sitting in an airport parking lot in my mid-twenties back in Nebraska watching and photographing airplanes, a mode of transportation that has always held a special fascination for me. It was in that parking lot, usually during my lunch hour, that I would begin to mentally piece together my first issue. Well, that idea was put on hold as dreams often are, but I never gave up on it. Then thirty years later the urge to make this dream a reality surfaced again. Little by little I put the pieces together and launched Skybrief, the State Aviation Journal online magazine and website. Interestingly, even in its dormancy, my dream had grown. What began as an idea for a statewide or even regional publication suddenly became national. I never thought of myself as a trailblazer, but in 2009 Skybrief was pretty unique. That certainly isn’t the case today. We’re all bombarded with weekly and daily summaries of the news. In fact, you can get multiple blasts a day if you wish. What I’ve tried to do to stand apart from the others is to stay focused on state aviation news and those stories that I think would be of particular interest to state aviation officials – stories that don’t get much play otherwise – unless they’re negative of course. I also try to use photography as much as possible. Coming on board at NASAO has placed me in the heart of what I’ve tried to focus on in the Journal. In regard to publishing the Journal, it has made some things easier and other things more difficult. Although there have been ongoing conversations for several years, some I’ve initiated others I wasn’t aware of, the move toward a partnership between SAJ and NASAO was, I think, inevitable. I also believe it makes a lot of sense. The subtle changes that have appeared in Skybrief and now the magazine, don’t reflect the discussion and planning that has and is taking place behind the scene. As Mark Kimberling, NASAO’s President and I continue to explore what is possible I’m pretty excited about where we can go and what we can do. I am encouraged by the clear vision that President Kimberling has for NASAO, SAJ and our partnership. I also appreciate and value the trust that he, the NASAO Board and the membership has placed in me. My goal has always been to create the best means to communicate to the industry the important role that state aviation plays, its history and perhaps more personally, a way to brag about the terrific programs and amazing passionate people that exist within state aviation. It is through this partnership with NASAO that I think this goal will ultimately be fulfilled. I thank each of you for your past support and encouragement. And, most importantly, I invite you to journey with us as we add power, pull back on the stick and explore new horizons.
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Page 3
Guest Commentary
By Greg McNeal
On the Horizon: an Expanded Role for States in Unmanned Traffic Management From the very beginning, the task of integrating drones into the national airspace was designed to be a shared responsibility. NASA would take the lead on early concepts, in collaboration with industry and the FAA. The FAA would then oversee testing and implementation – and create forums in which all stakeholders could share ideas and participate in the emerging Unmanned Traffic Management framework. State, local, and tribal authorities were always meant to be one of those stakeholders. In fact, their participation is necessary for any UTM system to work. To fly safely in low-altitude airspace, and especially under 200 feet, drones will need access to information only state and local stakeholders can provide, such as alerts about nearby first responder activity, or the location and height of a newly permitted crane in a nearby construction site. UTM will be used by state authorities, municipalities, and airports of all sizes to pass safety-critical information to drones – Gregory S. McNeal information that will allow drones to more fully understand the surrounding Professor, Law & Public Policy, Pepperdine Co-Founder, AirMap environment and enable sophisticated operations beyond visual line of sight. While state and local authorities have a clear role in UTM, it remains an open question whether that role extends to crafting regulations below 400 feet. All signs point to changing opinions at the FAA. The agency has yet to formally and completely preempt local drone rules, pointing to “Laws traditionally related to state and local police power – including land use, zoning, privacy, trespass, and law enforcement operations” as areas where local rules might be appropriate. And in May, FAA Administrator Michael Huerta told the Drone Advisory Committee (DAC) that the FAA may consider clearing the way for state and local authorities to regulate drones – no doubt reflecting concerns at the agency that it won’t be able to handle the influx of millions of drones into the national airspace system with its current staff, budget, and resources. “When you’re talking about an entire city essentially being an airport, the model that has served us well for airports doesn’t work very well,” he told the DAC. “We are open to looking at the question of how we can resolve this…The first thing we need to understand is…what exactly the state and local governContinued on next page Page 4
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Summer 2017
ments would like to [control] and how can we find a way to coexist.” The introduction of a new bill, the “Drone Federalism Act,” provides further evidence that an expanded role for state and local authorities is on the horizon. The bill would confirm that state, local, and tribal authorities have the right to make “reasonable restrictions” about the time, manner, and place of drone operations below 200 feet, while reserving airspace above that purely for
Regardless of what happens to the bill, it’s clear that an expanded role for state and local authorities is likely, whether that direction comes from Congress or from the FAA itself. It will be a tremendous responsibility, but it will also present an important opportunity to shape how drones take flight in America’s low-altitude airspace. States (and their local counterparts) want to welcome drones, poised to create more than $127 million in global economic impact over the next few years. UTM will make high-scale drone operations possible, but if states and communities are shut out of the UTM process, we risk a
federal authority. Manned aviation would be exempt from these restrictions and remain covered by federal preemption. Moreover, the bill would commission ten state and local pilot programs that would test airspace management and data exchange strategies for UTM - opportunities for all drone stakeholders to learn from state and local authorities about what works best in their communities. The “Drone Federalism Act” is not the only path forward for the drone industry, and much discussion and debate will need to take place before we can determine the best course of action for this next phase of aviation innovation.
backlash against drones that would set back the industry – and the safety of the national airspace – for decades to come. To avoid this outcome, there must be cooperation between the drone industry, the manned aviation community, and state authorities, including the agencies counted among NASAO’s members. The officials that know the airspace best must have a voice in determining how we manage it. Whether we work together because of the requirements of law, or we do so by choice, collaboration is the only way to ensure a safe future for the national airspace and a thriving future for the drone industry.
Unmanned Traffic Management Continued from previous page
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Page 5
Guest Commentary
By Ed Bolen
NBAA Remains Steadfast in Combating National, Local Access Challenges Business aviation provides a vital link in the national transportation system, and facilitates commerce for thousands of companies and communities across the country. Unfortunately, our industry’s access to the freedom and flexibility afforded by our national airspace system (NAS) is threatened at both the national and local levels. As you know, the Trump Administration has called for privatization of our nation’s air traffic control (ATC) network, first in a fiscal year 2018 budget document released March 16, and more recently, in a follow-up plan released May 23. Should that plan become reality, the ATC system – which is a natural monopoly that currently serves the public’s interest, and is overseen by the public’s elected representatives – would be turned over within Ed Bolen, the next four years to an entity effectively controlled by President, National Business Aviation Association private interests. This represents a very real danger to the citizens, companies and communities that rely on general aviation, which – in addition to providing a critical transportation lifeline to smaller communities – also supports more than one million quality jobs, and contributes $219 billion in annual economic output.
Privatization Strips Congressional Oversight of ATC The nation’s system of airports and airspace is a public asset, built to serve the entire public. Without Congress to ensure that the public interest remains at the forefront of any decision affecting access to our nation’s airports and airspace, a private board could have ultimate authority Continued on next page Page 6
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Summer 2017
NBAA to 3,500 feet in the interim. Without question, SMO is a crucial airport for to dictate where people would be able to fly, at what business aviation; even more importantly, however, time, and at what cost. the airport provides a critical lifeline for the region It’s not difficult to foresee how such a system during times of crisis, and is a major reliever for would negatively impact the small and mid-size traffic into Los Angeles International Airport. NBAA towns that rely on access to general aviation for everything from civil services, to emergency support, believes that, by apparently spearheading this action to restrict, and ultimately close, a significant and vital to business access and more. That is why NBAA has airport, the FAA failed to abide by its own mandate to long been very concerned over these proposals, and defend national aviation infrastructure. fortunately, we aren’t alone in this battle. That is why NBAA joined with other stakeholdMore than a dozen regional business aviation groups across the nation have also joined with NBAA ers in response to that unprecedented decision with a petition for the appeals court to review the legality in voicing their opposition to ATC privatization by of the settlement agreement, in addition to numerous speaking out, writing letters, holding meetings, hostlegal challenges brought forth in response to other ing teleconferences and even getting non-aviation efforts by city officials to curtail aviation usage of organizations involved in the effort to halt the ATC SMO. privatization effort in its tracks. Influential congressional leaders have also quesOthers expressing concern over ATC privatization tioned the decision, including Rep. Ralph Lee Abrainclude congressional lawmakers from both sides ham (R-5-LA) who expressed his “deep concern” of the political aisle, mayors from towns across the about the unprecedented settlement, and asked the country, organizations on the political right and left, consumer groups and a majority of American citizens. FAA and Department of Transportation to clarify their rationale behind accepting the agreement. These voices will continue to be heard as the conWithout question, any effort to close or restrict gressional debate over the reauthorization of funding and programs for the Federal Aviation Administration access to airports and airspace poses grave risks to communities of all sizes. NBAA will continue to (FAA) continues. exercise every remaining option in these fights, and Move Underway to Restrict Important we will remain steadfast in our efforts to ensure that communities of all sizes will continue to benefit from SoCal Airfield the unparalleled capabilities offered through business aviation. Threats to airport access are also playing out on the local level, with the most visible example being Santa Monica Airport (SMO) in southern California. A unique, unprecedented agreement announced in late January between the FAA and the City of Santa Monica called for the historic airfield to remain open only through Dec. 31, 2028, and cleared way for city officials to reduce the length of SMO’s sole runway Continued from previous page
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Page 7
From the President
By Mark Kimberling
It truly is an honor to have been afforded this incredible opportunity to lead this historic association as we embark on a new chapter for NASAO with many new exciting and promising endeavors in the works. I have the good fortune of working with an incredibly talented and dedicated team – as Tracy, Kim and John are all playing an integral role in advancing the mission of this great organization. In this issue of the magazine, we highlight our collective advocacy work – which has been and will continue to be a core tenet of our mission at NASAO. With a sound strategic plan as our guide, I firmly believe that we are tactically making great strides in continuing to elevate our stature in Washington. With so many pivotal issues currently under consideration, we are committed to maintaining the states’ critical role at the forefront in shaping the future of our aviation system, as we know it. With our newly forged partnership with the State Aviation Journal, we have dramatically expanded our outreach as we’ve gone from reaching hundreds to thousands of industry professionals. Now, through our own communications channels and with our increased interaction with the general press, we not only have the opportunity to inform on NASAO happenings, but also - just as importantly - we are able to highlight all of the incredible work our members are doing out in the states. With a shared vision of both the NASAO Board and the NASAO Center Board, we’ve also initiated new training opportunities specifically for state aviation personnel at all levels – fulfilling a longstanding NASAO President, Mark Kimberling. need and adding new value for all NASAO members. Leveraging the collective expertise of our Business Partners, Member Benefit Education & Training Committee, and other members, we’ve started with technical webinars and inperson training sessions at our annual conference. We are also making solid progress with the long-term vision of developing an online comprehensive state aviation management training program - with more details to follow in the coming days. As you all know, this has been a year of change in many ways, as we have bid farewell to a number of valued longstanding members through retirements, which has also brought us many new faces with new energy and fresh ideas. I believe we now have an invaluable combination of institutional knowledge and new perspectives among our membership to move us forward, accomplish our goals, and implement new ideas. So stay tuned and stay engaged, as I truly believe the best days of our association lie ahead. We can only accomplish these goals with the active engagement of all of our members. As I’ve said before, there is nowhere I’d rather be than right here, representing all of you and working on your behalf. I’m very excited about the future of our association. Page 8
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Summer 2017
Coming this Fall!
Exclusive Coverage of the 86th Annual NASAO Annual Convention and Tradeshow Secure Your Advertsing Now Contact Kim Stevens for advertsimg information at 703-610-0223 or email kstevens@nasao.org.
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Page 9
Barry Cooper, far right, with state aviation officials and Administrator Huerta in front of the NASAO tent at AirVenture. From left are Ronnie Mitchell (NE), Kathy Vesely (MN), Huerta, and Cassandra Isackson (MN).
Barry Cooper Retires as Regional Administrator after 40 Years of FAA Service After a career with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) spanning forty years, most of which was in management positions within the FAA’s Great Lakes Region, Barry Cooper has retired. “I’ve been a proud representative of the Great Lakes Region for a long time,” said Cooper, who has served as the region’s administrator since August of 2007. The Great Lakes Region includes the states of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota. As Regional Administrator, Cooper served as the FAA’s primary representative and liaison regarding aviation issues and activities within the Great Lakes Region. “The aviation presence in these states is a big contributor to the pride I feel about our region,” said Cooper. As he completed his last week with FAA before retiring (June 30th), Cooper, in a memo, thanked the National Association of State Aviation Officials (NASAO) and the Great Lakes Region state aviation directors for the relationships he’s enjoyed with them and for the cooperation they extended him when working together over the years. Page 10
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
“As I look back on the decade that I’ve been the Regional Administrator, working with NASAO and the state directors has been both gratifying and enjoyable for me,” said Cooper. “The relationship I’ve had with state directors is something that I’ve certainly valued.” Cooper said that one of the most interesting things he had the opportunity to do during his years as regional administrator, was to serve as FAA’s liaison to NASAO for most of those years. “That allowed me to not only work with the great group of state aviation directors from my region, but also to work with state directors across the country on issues of national interest to the states and FAA.” Cooper said that role was a true Barry Cooper served as FAA liaison to NASAO. learning experience for him. “I know firsthand that the work FAA and NASAO did on a Continued on next page Summer 2017
Cooper Continued from previous page number of fronts helped make our aviation system better and safer.” Personally, Cooper noted, that he was given the opportunity to meet and work with a host of outstanding people representing state government and said he is proud of that association. “My work with NASAO is one of the reasons I tell people that, as Great Lakes regional administrator, I had the best job in the FAA.” Prior to assuming his Regional Administrator position, Cooper served as the FAA’s program manager and principal representative for the City of Chicago’s O’Hare Modernization Program, a multi-billion dollar airport development initiative that will increase capacity and reduce delays at the nation’s second busiest airport. In this position, Cooper coordinated the FAA’s internal efforts to meet all commitments and milestones associated with the O’Hare modernization initiative, while also interfacing extensively with the FAA’s external customers, including the City of Chicago, the State of Illinois, Congressional representatives, news media outlets, and civic groups. Cooper’s public service career began in 1976 as an FAA civil engineer performing design work on FAA facilities that support our nation’s air traffic control system. Throughout his career Cooper has had management responsibilities for both technical and administrative program areas including National Airspace System infrastructure design and operation, airport design standards and operations safety, financial management, logistics support, and labor management relations. Cooper said the Great Lakes Regional Administrator chair will be ably occupied, beginning July 1st and for the foreseeable future, by Christina Drouet, who was the FAA Great Lakes Region Deputy Regional Administrator. “Christina has 25 years of solid FAA experience, and you’ll enjoy working with her, said Cooper. “While I look forward to the next chapter in my life, I will miss being associated with the aviation system we have here in the Midwest, and I will miss working with
Barry Cooper, left was instrumental in bringing the FAA Administrator by the NASAO tent at AirVenture each year. Michael Huerta, center, shakes hands with NASAO’s Kim Stevens. Photo by Andrew Stevens.
you all.” Cooper is a 1976 graduate of the University of Massachusetts, where he obtained a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering, and is a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Illinois. He and his wife Laura reside in suburban Chicago and have three children.
Barry Cooper, left with former NASAO President Henry Ogrodzinski at AirVenture.
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 11
Focus on Florida Aviation Page 12
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Summer 2017
Gary Stevens
Sunshine State Provides Nice Place to Retire with Multiple Aviation Opportunities By Kim J. Stevens Transitioning to retirement may seem pretty straight-forward for some – planning your lifestyle, where you’re going to live, what you’re going to do (or not do) to occupy your time, and of course, your budget, determining what you can and can’t afford. But, the reality is, a lot of people aren’t able to anticipate the emotional challenges and even the letdown from spending thirty-plus years working hard, in preparation for this season of your life. Gary Stevens, who retired from the Illinois Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics in 2010 as a Flight Safety Coordinator, was one of those folks. “Like many people, I really struggled in the beginning of retirement, trying to figure it all out,” said Stevens. “I guess I kind of eased out of it though by doing a 75 day contract with IDOT and some hospital heliport consulting.” Looking back at his career, Stevens said he was very fortunate when he started at IDOT, to have many terrific mentors - “Two stand out; Charlie Wells on the airplane side and Duane Moore on the helicopter side. I always thought the work we did was very important and we were
Gary Stevens with his Varga Kachina.
given great responsibility to promote safety and aviation development.” Stevens said he found the work with the hospital heliports and supporting the mission to save lives most rewarding along with helping many people achieve the dream of having their own airstrip. “The work at the state level brings an understanding of aviation issues at the local level that the FAA alone cannot easily achieve,” said Stevens, who moved to Florida after his retirement. “AviContinued on page 14
CAP SRQ FL-044 Composite Squadron poses in front of the Manatee County Sheriff Department helicopter at the dedication of the Manatee County Emergency Operations Center heliport. Stevens is third from right.
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 13
Cadet Commander Jonathon Banks (who has just completed his 2nd year at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs) addresses the opening breakfast at Heli Expo about their heliport project with Manatee County. In the background standing is Cadet Sgt. Gabrielle McCoy who was a co-presenter.
Stevens Continued from page 13 ation in Florida is much different than Illinois.” Stevens said the ability of states to work closely with the FAA and local communities is a great and important benefit. “I think the [FAA] block grant program was very successful in achieving that good working relationship and has proven itself over the years,” said Stevens. “The ability of states to supplement FAA funding also made many airport improvements possible.” Stevens cited their surplus property program in Illinois as a great success in helping airports. “Many states play a vital role in being a clearing house for airport equipment that is still functional going to a struggling airport that could use the help.” Although the move to Florida was great, Stevens soon realized that he left behind the identity he had with the aviation community in Illinois. “That really bothered me at first.” “There are so many remarkable people living here [in Florida] with tremendous aviation and other career backgrounds - It really felt like starting over and I actually tried justifying that I had had a great career and a lot of fun in aviation, but now was the time to just start playing golf, kayaking, bike riding and enjoying the Florida life style.” That idea didn’t last long for Stevens. “Although I do enjoy those activities and many others in retirement, I dePage 14
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
cided there was no way I could walk away from aviation, so I got involved with [the Civil Air Patrol] CAP and [the Experimental Aircraft Association] EAA, and just recently became an airplane owner again.” Stevens said that if you had asked him if this was what he thought retirement would be all about, the answer would be a resounding, “No, it is far better and way more rewarding than I could have ever imagined.” Stevens said he can’t begin to express how rewarding it is to volunteer and to be able to pay back in some way the things people did to help him along the way. “I started as a cadet in CAP and really find working with our cadets to be very rewarding.” Volunteering as a [Certified Flight Instructor] CFI with senior members also keeps his flying skills sharp. “I never dreamed when I soloed in 1966 in a J-3 Cub I would have the opportunity to fly a G1000 equipped airplane - CAP made that possible along with the unlimited opportunity to continue learning while serving the community.” Stevens is a lifetime member of EAA and VP of Chapter 180. “Young Eagles, the camaraderie of our chapter volunteers, volunteering as a Government Host seeing old friends and doing forums on building your own strip at AirVenture - each year sure sustain my enthusiasm for aviation.” He maintains a membership with AOPA and HAI to stay informed as well. Continued on next page Summer 2017
Continued from previous page Although volunteering in aviation circles is rewarding and satisfying, Stevens says his charitable work with the Elks food program for school children of homeless families is probably the most rewarding work he has ever done. “Our Elks friends and volunteers are truly a family and the hours we spend together gives us a real sense of doing something to better our community and enriching our lives at the same time.” Having spent more than 24 years as a state aviation official he has some advice. “Focus on your mission.” Stevens says the view from the outside is far different than the view from your office. “Being gone for nearly 7 years and dealing with the same system I left has been very enlightening.” Stevens says it is sometimes difficult with the pressures of the office, state, and federal politics to stay focused on the reason an organization exists and that being a true public servant many times requires swallowing your pride, admitting you may have been wrong and don’t have all the answers. Stevens said he tried to stay focused during his public service career. “The delicate balance of
Stevens kneels with CAP cadets outside the opening breakfast at Heli Expo in Orlando. His squadron was invited by HAI to attend Heli Expo in Orlando for the breakfast and to tour the exhibit hall.
enforcing regulations, promoting aviation development and safety can only be achieved by staying focused on the mission.” Stevens encourages anyone considering a career in state aviation to do it. “To me the job provided an opportunity to serve the aviation community in Illinois and provided a variety of duties that friends at the FAA or in the private sector never could experience.”
The Varga Kachina For two years at his EAA Chapter 180 fall and spring picnics held at Airport Manatee (48X), Gary Stevens said he would always wander over to see a Varga that was for sale and think someday wouldn’t it be great to own one. “Seeing it really brought back memories of some of the most fun I ever had instructing and towing gliders at the CAP Illinois Wing summer encampment in Mattoon, IL (MTO) in Vargas. Some of my former students, many who I stay in touch with, also shared those memories.” Stevens said that during an EAA picnic last fall, his wife Shirley said “you should buy it”. He didn’t think twice! “In the words of my retired Wisconsin Aeronautics counterpart, John Dorcey (who I stay in touch with and see every year in Oshkosh) - “You have the best wife in the world.” “He is
Gary Stevens with his Varga Kachina.
right in many ways,” said Stevens. Stevens has a partner in the Varga, a United 777 pilot. They both agree that it is a blast to fly, has terrific performance and is so unique that everyone wants to really look at it. “It is a shame that the factory closed in Chandler, Arizona in 1982, but there is a great support network out there sharing the knowledge to keep them flying. Life is good!”
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 15
Guest Commentary
By Aaron Smith
Florida Invests $1 Billion in Airports Over Five Years Florida is known in the state aviation community for its robust funding program. Thanks to Governor Scott and the leadership of the Florida Legislature, over the past five years Florida has invested over $1 billion into its airport system both on and off the airfield. The grant program provides for a safe, cost-effective, and efficient statewide aviation system. Grant funds assist airports to build and maintain runways and taxiways, eliminate airport hazards, protect airspace, develop plans, acquire land, and build terminals and other facilities. And, we hope that level of funding will continue with another $1 billion planned to be invested over the next five years. All this with the addition of a spaceport element added to the mix. The department is funded by the State Transportation Trust Fund (STTF), with budget authorized by the Florida Legislature and Governor annually. The budget is based upon revenue estimates which are adjusted several times a year as is our commitments. In fiscal year 2015-16, the state motor fuel tax comprised 35% of STTF receipts. Motor vehicle tag and title fees were 16%. Aviation fuel tax, rental car surcharge, and documentary stamp taxes combine to be a little more than 6%. Federal Aid, which comes primarily from the federal fuel tax, was 35%. The balance of receipts comes from toll facility reimbursement, local government participation, and other miscellaneous sources. In 1990, the Legislature amended statue so as to create a consistent funding source for aviation, rail, transit and seaports, otherwise affectionately known as the other modes of transportation. Pursuant to statute the ‘other Continued on next page
Page 16
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Summer 2017
Aaron Smith, Manager, Florida Department of Transportation, Aviation and Spaceports Office.
Florida Continued from previous page
modes’, as we will call them, receive a minimum of 15% of the STTF. Keep in mind, the 15% is a minimum, not a maximum. The actual percentage varies year-to-year but on average is more along the lines of 18-20%. By the Legislature recognizing the significant value of the ‘other modes’, and dedicating a minimum percentage of the STTF, they poured the foundation of financial resources necessary to plan, develop and maintain the transportation infrastructure needed to support Florida’s transportation system. The Florida Office of Economic & Demographic Research determined the return on investment for the Aviation Program is 1.37, and is forecasted to be
1.72 (FY17-21). “For every dollar spent on the program, the state of Florida received 1 dollar and 72 cents back in tax revenue. The Aviation program area contributes $10.4 billion to real Disposable Personal Income and $9.6 billion to Florida’s real GDP in an average year.” (Source: Return on Investment for the Department of Transportation’s Work Program, OFFICE OF ECONOMIC & DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH, December 2016) In 2014, the department completed an update to the Florida Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study. Aviation in Florida contributes $144 billion in annual economic activity. That’s up $30 billion from the 2010 study. Commercial service airports account for over $108 billion. General Aviation accounts for over $7.7 billion. Military Airfields account for $12.8 billion.
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 17
Florida Aviation and Spaceports Office Touts Progressive Airport System The thought of Florida conjures up many things – from sunny warm beaches and retirement communities to major sports teams and a host of recreational opportunities for visitors and residents alike. But, if you’re in the aviation and aerospace field, Florida also says space launch and transportation services, research and education opportunities and of course, airports. Florida is fortunate to be served by one of the most comprehensive and progressive airport systems in the country. The Aviation and Spaceports Office which develops the Florida Aviation System Plan, promotes the development and improvement of Florida’s airports and spaceports, regulates airports and protects airport approaches. Major activities include aviation system development, aviation grant program, airport regulation, intergovernmental coordination, aviation outreach and emergency operations management. “Florida’s programs and staff are awesome,” said Chase C. Stockon, President of Panther International, a company that does business with the state, based in Tampa Bay. “Florida has one of the largest, strongest aviation systems in the country thanks in part to history but to a larger extent the support and programs of the Florida Aviation Office and their staff statewide.” Page 18
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
In accordance with state statutes, the Aviation and Spaceports Office regulates Florida’s 751 civilian airports through public airport inspection and licensing, and private airport registration. The office is also charged with providing information and outreach to local governments, other state agencies, the general public, legislators and members of Congress and federal agencies such as the Federal Aviation Administration. The office also develops
and maintains the Florida Aviation System Plan, aviation activity forecasts and promotes the development and improvement of Florida’s airports and spaceports. Staff also analyzes airspace obstructions and permit construction within ten nautical miles of public airports until the permitting authority has been assumed by local government.
Summer 2017
Continued on next page
Florida Continued from previous page Stockon, whose company provides aviation grant management systems nationwide, says they are always amazed at the size and impact of the Florida aviation program and the state staff’s work on the entire aviation system - both commercial and GA. With so much responsibility and that reputation, staying on top of everything can be a challenge. “Effective communication is an essential function in both our personal and professional worlds,” said Aaron Smith, the state’s aviation manager. “When communication is delivered and how [it is delivered], is driven by several factors including perspective and relevance.” As such, Smith says that weekly staff meetings (more often if needed) with his direct reports are conducted to highlight departmental initiatives, tackle ongoing challenges, as well as coordinate information sharing between section heads. “They, in turn, conduct staff meetings with their direct reports, as needed,” said Smith. In addition, Smith says simply walking around discussing ongoing issues, needs and opportunities with staff, is tremendously helpful. “Office staff meetings are generally utilized as opportunities to recognize accomplishments, train and share departmental initiatives,” said Smith. “I view each staff member as a colleague who plays a unique role within our specific line of work - All of who I greatly respect and trust.”
Aaron Smith, left, receives the Aviation Newsletter Award in 2015 from Kim Stevene, publisher of the State Aviation Journal.
The mission for Spaceports states that Florida has one of the most dynamic transportation systems in the world. Besides roads, bridges, seaports, and airports, they also Continued on page 20
Space But, it’s not just about airports. In Florida, space touches everyone. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) uniquely includes support for spaceports as part of their transportation network. Florida statutes direct the office to support Space Florida facility planning and funding. FDOT and Space Florida therefore work closely together to provide space transportation services and infrastructure in the state. Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 19
NASA Shuttle Landing Facility (TTS) 03531.3*A
Florida Continued from page 19 have a leadership role in America’s space program. Substantial public benefits such as GPS, weather forecasting, disaster response, smartphones, and NextGen rely on satellites to enhance their transportation system and improve their quality of life. Space Florida serves as the state’s lead agency for state aerospace-related activities with federal agencies, the military, state agencies, and the private sector. It promotes and assists Florida’s aerospace business sector by providing launch facilities, financial services, and innovative education programs. FDOT provides funding and technical assistance to Space Florida for transportation related infrastructure improvements. Program funds are used to stimulate private sector investment and commercial spaceport development in Florida. Most notably, the historic Shuttle Landing Facility at Kennedy Space Center was transferred from NASA to Space Florida in June 2015. At 15,000 feet long and 300 feet wide, it is one of the longest and most capable runways in the world. It will serve a new generation of space launch vehicles and be used as a testing ground for new technologies. Key aspects of the Spaceport Improvement Program are consistent with other FDOT programs for airports and Page 20
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
seaports: Projects are spaceport system plan and master plan driven; Match requirements, at least 50% non-state match toward project costs; Funds are restricted to spaceport territories, which are defined in Florida law; Funds are only issued to Space Florida; Guidance provided in The Florida Spaceport Improvement Program - Project Handbook (5.98 MB in PDF).
History Looking back, the Aviation Division of the State Road Department was created by an act of the Legislature on April 15, 1933. The first Director was Colonel Alexis B. McMullen who learned to fly in WWI. He barnstormed with Mabel Cody and owned several flight schools and aviation businesses. During WWII he was stationed in Morocco. He also established the Washington D.C. headquarters of NASAO. During his tenure with the Florida office, 84 new airports were constructed and the first Florida Aeronautical Chart was published. In April 1935, the Division presented the first Florida Ten-Year Plan of Aviation Development. At the time there were approximately 134 usable airports in Florida with expenditures of $1.2 million in federal, state, county, and city dollars. continued on next page Summer 2017
Florida Continued from previous page
Current Focus Smith says today they are currently focused on development of a series of responses and actions to address Florida Auditor Generals Findings from an audit conducted in 2016. The Findings generally revolve around documentation demonstrating compliance with department procedures, as well as refinement of a quality assurance and quality control processes which provide oversight of program implementation. “Several years ago we developed an Aviation Task Team made up of representatives from our central and district offices to address ongoing aviation related issues,” said Smith. “The team has been making good progress addressing each of the seven Findings and we expect to wrap up the final response by November 2017, with additional enhancements to our web-based data management system to follow. System improvements will allow remote QA/ QC processes to validate program implementation compliance.” Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 21
NASAO Members See Hill Visits and Strong Lineup As Key to Successful Legislative Conference The National Association of State Aviation Officials (NASAO) held a successful three-day legislative conference in early March, hearing from a prestigious list of top-notch speakers including Oklahoma Senator Jim Inhofe, Rep. Sam Graves of Missouri, FAA Administrator Michael Huerta, NTSB Chairman Chris Hart, Gary Rasicot, Acting TSA Deputy Administrator, and many others. NASAO’s annual Washington Legislative Conference was held in conjunction with the AASHTO Legislative Briefing in Washington D.C. close to Capitol Hill Sen. Jim Inhofe, left, speaks to NASAO members as Mark Kimberling looks on. allowing easy access for NASAO members to visit their delegation while in town. “The conference was an excellent opportunity to reengage with fellow members and discuss those issues important to our organization,” said Brad Brandt, NASAO Chairman and Aviation Director for the Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development, Aviation Division. “The conference agenda was one of the best line up of speakers and presenters that I have been involved with.” NASAO members and business partners also heard Jerry Chism, left, Arkansas aviation director, talks with Mike Trout, Director of the Michigan Office of Aeronautics. from HAI President Matt Zuccaro, Ed Bolen, President of NBAA, Andrew Moore, Executive Director, National Agriculture Aviation Association, Teri Bristol, Chief Operating Officer, FAA’s Air Traffic Organization, and Marke “Hoot” Gibson, Senior Advisor on UAS Integration for the FAA. “We were pleased to have our members and business partners fly in from around the country, including several first-time attendees, for this important and timely conference,” said Mark Kimberling, NASAO President and Gary Cathey, left, Caltrans Aeronautics Division Chief, discusses an issue with Ashish Solanki, Maryland Aviation.
Page 22
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Continued on next page Summer 2017
Monday Sessions
Bill Orellana, Tennessee Aviation Director, shared his decision to retire with Dave Fulton, Texas Aviation Director, center, and Vic Bird, Director of the Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission. Photos by Kim Stevens.
Continued from previous page CEO. “The roundtable setting of this meeting, by design, really is conducive to constructive, open discussions with key government leaders and industry partners alike.” “This was my first time to attend the Washington Legislative Conference and I was extremely impressed with the quality and variety of speakers,” said Jerry Chism, Director of the Arkansas Department of Aeronautics. “The subject matter was particularly relevant to issues that we face in my state and the information will be invaluable as we address these issues on a day-to-day basis.” Additional speakers were Bill Swelbar, Executive Vice President of InterVISTAS Consulting, Kevin Schlemmer, Chief of EAS & Domestic Analysis for the U.S. Department of Transportation, and Melanie Zanona, transportation reporter for The Hill. “This conference has been and continues to be a great Continued on page 24 Summer 2017
Dave Fulton, Texas Aviation Director, enjoys a lighter moment.
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 23
Legislative Conference Continued from page 23
Missouri Representative Sam Graves discusses FAA Reauthorizarization with NASAO members.
source of information for State Aviation Directors,” said James Stephens, Executive Director of the South Carolina Aeronautics Commission. “The content and presentations are always informative and timely based on current affairs. Not only is the content current, but the connections are even better. Each time I’m given an opportunity to network with my peers, I always come away with more knowledge.” David Ulane, Colorado’s Aeronautics Director found the conference to be a fantastic event, one that provided a great deal of value for him and the Division. “It was an excellent opportunity for me to combine Congressional delegation meetings with an outstanding line up of key DC leaders brought in by NASAO to provide an up close perspective on key aviation issues at play in our nation’s capital.” Also taking advantage of the opportunity to visit his Congressional delegation was Ronnie Mitchell, DirecContinued on next page
NTSB Chairman Chris Hart was one of many top-notch speakers at this year’s NASAO Legislative Conference.
Page 24
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Summer 2017
Legislative Conference Continued from previous page tor of the Nebraska Department of Aeronautics and current NASAO Vice Chairman. “The NASAO Legislative conference provided an opportunity for me to interact with all five of Nebraska’s legislative delegation in a relaxed atmosphere during the NE Legislative Delegation Breakfast, something I wouldn’t have been able to do otherwise.” “Those who missed attending this year’s Washington Legislative Conference missed a great opportunity to engage in some direct discussions with FAA Administrator Michael Huerta,” said Dr. John Eagerton. “Administrator Huerta was very generous with his time with the attendees and following his prepared remarks, left plenty of time for questions and answers.” While participating in the conference, Administrator Huerta also renewed the long-standing memorandum
FAA’s Marke “Hoot” Gibson, from the UAS Integration Office updated NASAO members.
Continued on page 26
Matt Zuccaro, left, HAI President, talks with Dr. Jeffrey DeCarlo, Administrator of the Massachusetts Aeronautics Division.
Bill Swelbar, InterVISTAS, talks about air service.
Tim Walsh, GCR, Inc., left and Ronnie Mitchell, Nebraska Department of Aeronautics Director.
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 25
Standing room only for the two-day legislative conference in Washington D.C.
Legislative Conference Continued from page 25 of understanding (MOU) between the NASAO and the FAA. (See page 25). Sponsors for the March 1-3 event included InterVISTAS and GCR, Inc. along with the Maryland Aviation Administration and the Aviation Division of the Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development.
NBAA President, Ed Bolen talked about ATC Privatization.
Page 26
Gary Rasicot, TSA
Teri Bristol, FAA
Tony McClosky, center, Director of the Pennsylvania Bureau of Aviation, discusses an issue.
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Summer 2017
Holly Woodruff Lyons, House T&I Aviation Subcommittee Staff Director. Andrew D. Moore, left, Executive Director, National Agriculture Aviation Association.
FAA Administrator Extends NASAO MOU FAA Administrator Michael Huerta renewed a long-standing memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the National Association of State Aviation Officials (NASAO) during NASAO’s Annual Washington Legislative Conference held in March. The five-year MOU continues a longterm cooperative agreement and partnership between the FAA and NASAO which began in the 1990s. From left are Brad Brandt, Michael Huerta and Mark Kimberling. “We truly value our close relationship with the FAA as our organizations have duplication of state and federal efforts in the development worked together on several important issues and programs of national and state air transportation systems. together since the inception of this program more than Brad Brandt, Louisiana Aviation Director and NASAO 20 years ago,” said Mark Kimberling, NASAO President Chairman, signed the agreement along with the FAA Adand CEO. “As the Administrator noted in his remarks, ministrator. the NASAO/FAA partnership is as important as ever, and Both the FAA and NASAO have a common mission to we look forward to continuing our work together over the advance and encourage the development of aviation renext 5 years under this MOU, and beyond.” sources within their respective areas of responsibility. The Through the MOU, NASAO seeks to develop uniformi- intention of the MOU is to continue the long standing, ty among the states and to preclude conflict and minimize cooperative relationship between the FAA and NASAO. Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 27
House Appropriator Chuck Fleischmann (R-TN) in route to the Capitol for an afternoon vote series accompanied by Mark Kimberling and John Shea. On-the-go meetings like this one often start in the Member’s office and carry on across Independence Avenue all the way to the steps of the Capitol.
On the Hill
Representing the States Top Priority for NASAO With the mantra of “expect the unexpected” John Shea and Mark Kimberling both charge into a day’s work knowing that no matter how well they plan each day advocating for states on Capitol Hill, by day’s end it probably will have turned out completely different. In Washington D.C. that’s the norm. “No two days are exactly the same,” says Kimberling, President of the National Association of State Aviation Officials (NASAO), who along with Shea, NASAO’s Government Relations Manager, can experience long days (and evenings) when Congress is in session. According to both, summertime is especially hectic and when you add in the warm temperatures and high humidity, the swamp can get pretty steamy. Shea says, during this time of year both Chambers have Page 28
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
jam-packed legislative calendars, and there are usually twice as many people on the Hill on a given day. With tourists flooding into town and school field trips, Shea says it’s not uncommon to see two hundred people in the security line at the Independence Avenue entrance of the Rayburn House Office Building. “These are the times that we miss having our staff badges to be able to skip the line,” said Kimberling, who previously worked on transportation, aviation, and other policy issues in Congress for California Representatives and committee chairs, Zoe Lofgren and Howard Berman. Protesters from all walks of life may also stop traffic or block entrances to the Congressional office buildings with planned protests. “It’s funny how quickly you become Continued on next page Summer 2017
On the Hill Continued from previous page accustomed to the chaos over time and naturally tune out a man in a chicken suit with a blaring megaphone as you make your way around the Hill,” said Kimberling. Shea, who also has prior experience working on the Hill for Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (TX), and Representatives Chuck Fleischmann (TN) and Stephen Fincher (TN), said meetings, meals, and even coffee meetups are scheduled about a week ahead of time; but no matter how carefully planned, every day is fluid. “Vote times change, hearings run long and news will break that will change the course of the day,” said Shea. “Just one of these occurrences, as well as many others, can have a disrupting ripple effect on the schedule in a given day.” Shea says being well organized does help and having a phone charger handy is a must. “The hallway, cafeteria or some other nook can quickly become a makeshift office.” NASAO has a long history of advocating for the aviation needs of the states in Washington D.C. Dr. John Eagerton, Aeronautics Bureau Chief for the Alabama Department of Transportation has been a member of NASAO for 23 years and has observed the growing influence of NASAO on Capitol Hill. “When I first came on board in 1994, NASAO had virtually no presence or
Mark Kimberling discusses issues with an airline pilot near the Rayburn House Office Building courtyard.
influence in the legislative arena that I was aware of,” said Dr. Eagerton. “When Henry O [Ogrodzinski] became President, NASAO became much more involved with both the federal legislative and regulatory processes.” Dr. Eagerton remembers that under Ogrodzinski’s leadership NASAO developed much stronger alliances with other groups and associations that shared common interests on a broad range of aviation issues. “Henry’s leadership brought a greater level of visibility and interaction with key congressional members, committees and their staff.” Under Ogrodzinski’s tenure, NASAO began to be heard, and the state’s views began to matter. And recently, NASAO has embarked on another transitional and transformative era under the combined leadership of former President, Greg Principato and now Kimberling. “Under their guidance, NASAO has moved from responding to legislative or regulatory proposals to becoming directly involved with the shaping of legislation and regulations before they are introduced,” said Eagerton. “We’ve moved from a reactive to a much more proactive posture and aligned with some of the nation’s most influential associations that represent state and local governmental interests.” This change in focus for the Association came in part from the membership through strategic planning sessions. “Influencing public policy and being a voice that is heard
Arriving at the House Ways and Means Committee entrance.
Summer 2017
Continued on page 30 NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 29
On the Hill Continued from page 29 on the Hill was the number one objective membership had for NASAO,” said Vic Bird, Director of the Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission. “I have no doubt that it is still number one based upon many comments since then, and frankly, I believe it always has been number one in the minds of the members. For Bird, it’s the biggest reason he’s a NASAO member. “NASAO is my advocate with respect to aviation issues in Congress and the FAA.” Kimberling says it is NASAO’s mission to be the nationally recognized “voice” for the public interest, states and territories, on aviation and the national aviation system. “We also strive to be the ‘eyes and ears’ for our members with increasingly thorough and timely reporting -- via legislative updates and otherwise -- on issues and happenings in Washington,” continued Kimberling. “This is essential in equipping our members to engage with their respective delegations in an informed manner and strengthening our collective voice.” This change in emphasis has been noticed and effective. “We’re on dance floors insofar as critical issues before Congress and the FAA that we haven’t been for the past couple of years,” said Bird. “We’re already getting dividends for their (and our) investment of time and energy.” Ronnie Mitchell, Aeronautics Division Director for the Nebraska Department of Transportation agrees. “NASAO is doing a great job of getting the state’s message to congress. It is of critical importance that state aviation offices have a voice advocating for our interests at the congressional level, and NASAO has been and will continue to be the voice for us.” Getting to that point has required and continues to demand a lot of work. Establishing NASAO as a trusted resource on the Hill not only adds credibility to NASAO’s outreach on legislative priorities but also results in Congressional offices reaching out to NASAO for technical assistance or other material support on a number of issues. “It has been said before, but we truly are uniquely situated representing the public interest, rather than any parPage 30
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
ticular segment of aviation or a special interest. As such, we have established and continue to fortify our reputation as trusted and even-handed advocates on the Hill,” said Kimberling. “Leveraging the collective expertise among our membership and having a particularly sound technical understanding of a broad array of issues is an invaluable asset in standing out in a sometimes crowded field of interests.” Shea stressed that as former Hill staffers in both the House and Senate, he and Kimberling have developed a firm understanding of what Members of Congress and their staff take into consideration before taking a position or legislative action on a particular issue. “To be an effective advocate, it is critical to present your legislative priorities in a way that clearly acknowledges their internal process and demonstrates an understanding of the current political landscape for the issues,” explained Shea. “This means doing your homework on the Member, state and/or district, as well as any other key factors before the meeting ever takes place.” continued on next page
Treking the tunnel between House and Senate office buildings in the bowels of the Capitol Complex.
Summer 2017
Continued from previous page Although it can be easy for any message to fall through the cracks, Shea says to get their message to resonate, it helps to provide district and/or state-specific data that illuminates how certain policies impact their constituents, airports, and how that factors into the national aviation system as a whole,” said Shea. Kimberling and Shea continue to forge new privatesector partnerships and often team-up on issues and sign joint industry letters on issues of common interest. “But we also take the lead on an increasing basis on issues that are no other association’s top-priority,” said Kimberling. An example was a troubling amendment in the House this year. “In a situation like this, we essentially have 24 hours or less to reach out to every Committee member, determine a ‘whip count’ (list of who is voting for or against the amendment), and tailor our messaging, leaving no stone unturned in getting the amendment defeated. Shea said in cases like this, late hours are the norm for Congressional staffers, particularly on the eve of a markup, so it’s not unusual to have conversations with them at 10 or 11 at night. Kimberling said the House markup was approximately 9 ½ hours long, and NASAO is always present for the duration of significant hearings to not only see issues through, but to be able to report firsthand on all of the proceedings - right down to every amendment considered or significant statement made on issues of importance to their membership. With 535 Members of Congress (60 freshman this year), and a high turnover rate with Congressional staff, it helps that both Shea and Kimberling worked for lawmakers on opposite sides of the aisle and built many great relationships prior to joining NASAO. Developing and maintaining old and new relationships is a time-consuming but vital part of NASAO’s advocacy efforts. “With new staff or even a new member of Congress without a background in aviation, we often have to start with who we are and why we matter, before getting into issue-specific messaging,” said Shea. “We intently meet and check in with staff-
ers in a measured manner not just when we have an issue to advocate, but also to keep NASAO at the forefront of their minds as a resource on aviation issues.” Although one naturally develops friendships over time on the Hill and having good relationships is critical, Kimberling says it’s not a matter of being “chummy” with everyone. “Some of our best relationships are all business, with a high-level of mutual trust that only comes from having worked together on issues in the past.” Dr. Eagerton believes that, at this juncture in NASAO’s long history, they are better positioned than ever to have their collective voices heard. “Each member of NASAO should truly appreciate the strength NASAO has brought to our voices on Capitol Hill.” Dave Fulton, Director of the Texas Division of Aviation agrees. “NASAO does a variety of things that benefit the states in many ways, and all are important. However, in my opinion, representing the interest of the states in Congress is at the top of the list.”
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 31
State and federal aviation officials along with GCR, Inc. staff pose for the class photo at Ryan Field in Tucson. Photos by Kim Stevens.
Tucson and Ryan Field Hosts Airport Inspection Class GCR Inc., in association with the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Airport Engineering Division, Airport Safety Data Program, held their 32nd semi-annual training class entitled, “Airport Master Record Seminar,” May 16 – 19, 2017 in Tucson, Arizona. The training held at the University Park Hotel near the University of Arizona campus, included a day of training in the field at Ryan Field, a general aviation airport run by the Tucson Airport Authority. Twenty state aviation officials participated including Martin Blake, manager of the Office of Aviation for the Indiana Department of Transportation. In addition, there were five FAA officials in attendance, including Andrew Goldsmith with the Office of Airport Safety and Standards Page 32
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
in Washington D.C. “As always, it was a pleasure to meet the personnel who fulfill the critical role of assuring our airport infrastructure supports and enables effective safety of flight in the National Airspace System,” said Goldsmith. “The practical knowledge and exchange of information that occurs during this training is invaluable and appreciated throughout. It highlights the expertise Continued on next page Summer 2017
Roger Finnell (IL), center, introduces himself on the first day of class.
Inspection Continued from previous page utilized daily by the inspectors.� Providing instruction, both in the classroom and out in the field were Randy Coller, an airport inspector with the Michigan Office of Aeronautics and GCR, Inc. employees, Richard Gossen, David Murla, Joyce Piacun and Robert Bryant. Continued on page 34
Tucson Airport staff discuss sign maintenance with airport inspectors.
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 33
Tucson Airport Authority Director of Operations and Communications, Jeff Horton points to a property map of Ryan Field.
Ryan Field continued from page 33 “We find that these training sessions are as much a benefit to us as it is to the attendees,” said Gossen, who manages GCR’s Federal Aviation Services. “We get to meet our partners, in person, and learn their story. The opportunity to get state airport inspectors from all over the country together, sharing knowledge and inspection techniques is invaluable.” Continued on next page
FAA’s Rachel Evans and Anthony Vazquez check out the angles.
Page 34
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Summer 2017
ATC Tower on Ryan Field
Signs on Ryan Field
Ryan Field Continued from previous page Following classroom activities in the hotel on Tuesday and Wednesday, field training was held at Ryan Field on Thursday. Attendees were able to observe conditions at the airport and practice in the field what they learned in the classroom. Jeff Horton, Director of Operations and Communications for the Tucson Airport Authority (TAA) gave a brief history of the airport and answered questions
Randy Coller photographs a runway sign.
Continued on page 36
Belinda Hampton (TN), measures the lip on the taxiway light base, while Randy Coller gets a photo.
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 35
A View of Tucson from Mount Lemmon
Photo below - Rachel Evans, FAA, enjoys the crisp air at the top of Mount Lemmon as Bob Bryant, GCR, looks on.
Ryan Field Continued from page 35
Andrew Goldsmith, FAA
about day to day operations and unique characteristics and challenges they experience at the airport. Will Roosma, TAA Airside Operations Officer, accompanied the class out on the airport allowing attendees the opportunity to see first-hand operations and maintenance being performed on the field.
Colorado Aeronautics Division Receives Innovator Award The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) recently issue the Aeronautics Division was the recipient of a CDOT “Innovator Award” for the implementation of an airport excise tax disbursement process improvement. CDOT COO Mike Lewis presented the award at an Executive Management Team Meeting. The recognition is presented to CDOT groups for successfully implementing and sharing an innovative idea to improve a process and benefit CDOT customers. David Ulane, Aeronautics Division Director said he was incredibly proud to announce the recognition. “Our Business Manager, Bryce Shuck, deserves significant kudos for taking to heart my challenge to staff to constantly look for opportunities to be more effective and efficient,” said Page 36
NASAO/State Aviation Journal
Ulane. “This effort reflects highly on him, our Division and the Colorado Aeronautical Board (CAB). According to Ulane, the former process for disbursing excise taxes to airports was grounded with several inefficiencies that burdened time and resources of both airport customers and CDOT’s Aeronautics staff. “Many airports opted to skip the process entirely and did not claim the revenue they were due,” said Ulane. Shuck, Aeronautics Division Business Manager, noted that when it came to processing the different tax reimbursements, the former Excise process took 25% of his time for a program that was only 5% of the revenue and disbursements. That is until CDOT Aeronautics staff Continued on next page Summer 2017
The Colorado Division of Aeronautics Team.
Continued from previous page asked why and determined to make the process work better for them and the customer. Addressing internal and external frustration with the disbursement process, staff questioned if there wasn’t a better way. Schuck sought and found a better way that actually already existed with the automated sales tax refund process. The new process eliminated the fuel claim form entirely. It was discovered that there was neither historic justification for the current, cumbersome process nor legal prohibition against the improved process. Now Aeronautics staff pulls monthly fuel tax reports directly from DOR and issues the appropriate refund. “We took the inconvenience away from airport managers, and the new process is much simpler and takes a few hours per month,” said Shuck. Colorado state statute requires the Division of Aeronautics to disburse a portion of aviation fuel excise tax revenues back to the airport where the fuel was sold. In order for airports to submit a paper form each month, they had to first collect sales information from the fuel vendors. CDOT Aeronautics then had to manually match up claims made on the form to those submitted from the Department of Revenue (DOR). The program was wrought with processing and waiting. Frequent errors, omissions, and incomplete information further delayed disbursements, or in some cases, resulted in no disbursement at all. The new excise disbursement process took flight in January after enthusiastic approval from the Aeronautical Board and a communication campaign to airports.
“Feedback from airports has been incredible,” said Ulane. “They’ve been universally appreciative of this improvement.” Smaller airports like Springfield, Westcliff, and many more, are receiving revenue they hadn’t been before. Even a little goes a long way to help pay for operations. One appreciative manager said “it doesn’t sound like a government agency to want to give money back.” David and Bryce agreed that it was the initiative and collaborative approach with a focus on improving the customer experience that made this idea a success. “I’m truly fortunate to lead such a passionate and proactive team,” said Ulane. I’m thrilled to share this recognition”
Summer 2017
NASAO/State Aviation Journal Page 37
A special moment of remembrance will be observed at 10:00 a.m. ND ANNIVERSARY 2 8 E H T R O F JOIN US
ANNUAL
2017
SATURDAY, AUGUST 12 Events start at 7:30 a.m.
Celebrating aviation in the heartland! See vintage aircraft, World War I fighters, experimentals, bi-planes, and much more!
BRING YOUR LAWN CHAIRS!
FREE ADMISSION FOOD & CONCESSIONS ANTIQUE & CLASSIC CARS CHEROKEE STORYTELLING INFLATABLE AMUSEMENTS
Will Rogers Birthplace Ranch 9501 East 380 Road (2 miles east of Hwy 169 on 380 Rd.)
For more information, call 918-341-0719 or visit www.willrogers.com
Ceremony will be broadcast on www.rsuradio.com beginning at 9:55 a.m.