TOP 10 QUALIFYING RURAL AREAS FOR EB-5 INVESTMENTS October 2023 info@houstoneb5.com +1 (823) 829-5805 Powered by
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 Methodology ...................................................................................... 1 Heartland Forward Report ....................................................... 3 Top Rural Micropolitan Areas .................................................. 4-9 Conclusion ........................................................................................... 10
METHODOLOGY:
This section outlines the methodology employed in this white paper to identify top Micropolitan areas that qualify as rural areas for EB-5 investment purposes (less than 20,000 people) and are within a 1.5hour drive from a Metropolitan Statistical
1
Area (MSA) with a population of at least 1.5 million people. The analysis utilizes Heartlandforward.org’s top Micropolitan areas rankings as the basis for filtering and identifying suitable locations for investment.
2
Data Collection:
The initial step involved collecting the list of Micropolitan areas and their respective rankings from Heartlandforward.org’s latest report. This ranking considers various socio-economic factors and indicators to assess the economic performance and growth potential of these areas.
Filtering for Rural Areas:
The next step involved filtering the Micropolitan areas to identify those that qualified as rural areas for EB-5 investment purposes. Rural areas were defined as having a population of less than 20,000 people, aligning with the EB-5 program’s requirement for investment in areas with low population density.
Identifying Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs):
3
The analysis then focused on identifying MSAs with a population of at least 1.5 million people. This criterion was used to ensure proximity to major urban centers, which often offer robust economic opportunities, resources, and infrastructure.
Calculating Distance and Drive Time:
4
Geospatial analysis was conducted to calculate the distance and drive time between the filtered Micropolitan areas and the identified MSAs. The drive time was limited to within a 1.5-hour radius to ensure reasonable commuting distance and access to the larger urban center.
5
Ranking and Final Selection:
After applying the filters and determining the Micropolitan areas that met the rural and proximity criteria, a final ranking was established based on various factors, including economic indicators, growth potential, infrastructure, and regional context. This ranking aimed to identify the top Micropolitan areas that offer favorable conditions for investment.
It is important to note that the methodology described above is based on publicly available data and standard analytical techniques. Limitations may exist due to data availability or evolving economic
conditions. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution and verified through further due diligence and in-depth research specific to individual investment requirements.
1 Methodology Powered by
TOP MICROPOLITAN AREAS
Here are the top 100 micropolitan areas identified by the Heartland Forward report:
4 Top Rural Micropolitan Areas Powered by
Heartland Ranking Micropolitan Areas Population Per Capita Personal Income 1 Los Alamos, NM 19,330 $87,078 2 Jackson, WY-ID 35,842 $172,693 3 Heber, UT 79,266 $129,161 4 Pecos, TX 14,544 $48,501 5 Jefferson, GA 80,286 $52,779 6 Bozeman, MT 122,713 $68,568 7 Hailey, ID 25,905 $129,571 8 Cedar City, UT 60,519 $41,442 9 Prineville, OR 25,739 $47,964 10 Edwards, CO 55,727 $91,914 11 Moses Lake, WA 100,297 $49,968 12 Brevard, NC 33,165 $51,771 13 Key West, FL 82,170 $115,472 14 Oak Harbor, WA 87,432 $61,032 15 Breckenridge, CO 30,941 $81,331 16 Steamboat Springs, CO 25,091 $89,785 17 Sandpoint, ID 49,491 $50,543 18 Othello, WA 20,621 $51,154 19 Gardnerville Ranchos, NV 49,870 $84,563 20 Fernley, NV 60,903 $47,555 21 Fredericksburg, TX 27,297 $75,442 22 Dodge City, KS 34,159 $51,555 23 Fremont, NE 37,103 $59,030 24 Jesup, GA 30,380 $40,816 25 Montrose, CO 48,203 $49,726 Heartland Ranking Micropolitan Areas Population Per Capita Personal Income 26 Truckee-Grass Valley, CA 103,487 $64,922 27 Rexburg, ID 67,473 $37,609 28 Crescent City, CA 28,100 $40,221 29 Safford, AZ 39,050 $43,793 30 Athens, TX 83,667 $47,483 31 The Dalles, OR 26,726 $50,523 32 Kalispell, MT 108,454 $57,010 33 Bemidji, MN 46,380 $51,208 34 Red Bluff, CA 65,498 $46,040 35 Ellensburg, WA 45,499 $46,668 36 Durant, OK 47,105 $43,144 37 Port Angeles, WA 78,209 $51,257 38 Wilmington, OH 42,004 $55,312 39 Okeechobee, FL 40,266 $37,917 40 Glenwood Springs, CO 79,509 $87,580 41 Fallon, NV 25,723 $54,007 42 Georgetown, SC 63,921 $61,749 43 Wauchula, FL 25,425 $34,425 44 Burley, ID 47,119 $55,448 45 Vineyard Haven, MA 21,097 $82,566 46 Cambridge, MD 32,489 $54,758 47 Pullman, WA 47,873 $46,009 48 Aberdeen, SD 42,134 $70,414 49 Ukiah, CA 91,305 $54,834 50 Ottawa, KS 25,986 $53,105
5 Top Rural Micropolitan Areas Powered by Heartland Ranking Micropolitan Areas Population Per Capita Personal Income 51 Carlsbad-Artesia, NM 60,911 $71,312 52 Barre, VT 59,969 $66,602 53 Fairfield, IA 15,647 $48,832 54 Mountain Home, ID 28,827 $47,473 55 Effingham, IL 34,430 $63,459 56 Helena, MT 84,693 $58,210 57 Washington, IN 33,397 $54,428 58 Eureka-Arcata, CA 136,310 $50,218 59 Arcadia, FL 34,408 $30,187 60 Cañon City, CO 49,661 $40,744 61 Sheridan, WY 31,646 $66,786 62 Clearlake, CA 68,766 $47,177 63 Pahrump, NV 53,450 $44,610 64 Nogales, AZ 47,883 $52,698 65 Whitewater, WI 106,799 $60,260 66 Moultrie, GA 45,812 $43,790 67 Ruidoso, NM 20,436 $51,157 68 Pella, IA 33,380 $61,389 69 Dumas, TX 21,118 $56,376 70 Clewiston, FL 40,313 $38,511 71 Tahlequah, OK 47,627 $41,080 72 Centralia, WA 84,398 $49,230 73 Alamogordo, NM 68,537 $44,349 74 Portales, NM 19,019 $53,749 75 Hood River, OR 24,057 $62,553 Heartland Ranking Micropolitan Areas Population Per Capita Personal Income 76 Blackfoot, ID 48,876 $48,047 77 Cullowhee, NC 57,546 $46,014 78 Emporia, KS 34,596 $50,362 79 Morehead City, NC 68,541 $61,638 80 PinehurstSouthern Pines, NC 102,763 $63,071 81 Shelton, WA 67,615 $47,322 82 Oxford, MS 56,884 $54,344 83 Moscow, ID 40,313 $49,632 84 Marshall, MO 23,289 $50,140 85 Payson, AZ 53,589 $55,192 86 Worthington, MN 21,991 $60,817 87 Bonham, TX 36,569 $46,613 88 Union City, TN 30,466 $52,501 89 Port Lavaca, TX 19,727 $57,147 90 Laramie, WY 37,608 $46,824 91 Liberal, KS 21,747 $49,868 92 Spearfish, SD 26,165 $62,294 93 Lawrenceburg, TN 44,828 $44,090 94 Maryville, MO 21,160 $42,270 95 Taos, NM 34,623 $49,136 96 Palatka, FL 74,167 $39,386 97 Holland, MI 120,950 $56,970 98 Show Low, AZ 108,147 $45,163 99 Martin, TN 33,036 $47,858 100 Clarksburg, WV 89,385 $57,435
TOP QUALIFYING EB-5 RURAL AREAS
Heartland’s study defined a micropolitan area as an area outside of an MSA with a population of more than 10,000 but fewer than 50,000 residents, however, a few areas in the study have populations above 50,000 as the report included adjacent
counties’ populations with the town populations. For the purpose of this white paper report, we filtered Heartland’s Study to show which of the top micropolitan areas have a population of less than 20,000 to conform to EB-5 rural qualifications.
Post filter, there are 74 micropolitan areas identified by the Heartland Forward top 100 report that also qualify for a rural EB-5 project:
6 Top Rural Micropolitan Areas Powered by
Additional filter: Proximity to MSAs
While all the listed micropolitan areas in the graphic above qualify as rural, it's important to consider their proximity to MSAs. Investing in areas within a 1.5-
hour drive from a large MSA containing more than 1.5 million residents offers several advantages:
Larger Market Potential: Projects can draw visitors or customers from both the rural area and the nearby MSA, enhancing the potential for success through a larger target market.
Trends in Urban Migration:
As cities become more crowded, residents are moving to suburbs and surrounding rural areas, a trend amplified by the pandemic. Proximity to an MSA capitalizes on this shift. With that said, areas that are considered rural now may not be in the future due to increased migration and will have higher demand.
Economies of Scale: Areas near an MSA benefit from lower material costs, reduced logistics expenses, and more competitive subcontractor pricing, which lowers the overall construction costs. This in turn reduces the requirement of higher sales and rental rates to achieve a higher profit margin than a costlier project.
7 Top Rural Micropolitan Areas Powered by
TOP RURAL MICROPOLITAN AREAS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO A MSA
Here are the top rural micropolitan areas identified by the Heartland Forward report that also are located in close proximity to a large MSA:
8 Top Rural Micropolitan Areas Powered by
Legend: Micropolitan Area Nearby MSA 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 10 9
9 Top Rural Micropolitan Areas Powered by Micropolitan Areas (less than 20,000 people) Population HeartLands Ranking Rural Ranking Nearby MSA Population Per Capita Personal Income Jefferson, GA 13.986 5 1 Atlanta Metropolitan Area 6,222,106 $52,779 Breckenridge, CO 5,024 15 2 Denver Metropolitan Area 2,985,871 $81,331 Fredericksburg, TX 11,072 21 3 Greater San Antonio 2,655,342 $75,442 Fredericksburg, TX 11,072 21 3 Austin Metropolitan Area 2,421,115 $75,442 Athens, TX 12,890 30 4 Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area 7,943,685 $47,483 The Dalles, OR 16,034 31 5 Portland Metropolitan Area 2,509,489 $50,523 Wilmington, OH 12,502 38 6 Cincinnati Metropolitan Area 2,265,051 $55,312 Ottawa, KS 12,604 50 7 Kansas City Metropolitan Area 2,209,494 $53,105 Effingham, IL 12,221 55 8 St.Louis Metropolitan Area 2,801,319 $63,459 Shelton, WA 19,095 61 9 Seattle Metropolitan Area 4,034,248 $47,322 Whitewater, WI 14,351 65 10 Milwaukee Metropolitan Area 1,559,792 $60,260