METAL Nº38, Autumn/Winter 2017
A single letter along with a punctuation mark and two digits is all there is to the email signature of the
growing
sender: 69, No more, no less. The reply to my earlier enquiry, albeit positive, is just as brief. Yes, we can do an interview and yes, one of the dates I had suggested suited them well. Fast forward
for
the
clothing
line
researching
them
collection, by
that
has not been an easy task. A
–
if
you're
lucky.
And
yet,
69 seems all over the place: there
are
collaborations
with the art world here and
a growing celebrity following
there. Among them are Rihanna, Chloë Sevigny and Erykah Badu
to name but a few. Still, 69 remains
a
brand
is
shy
without
a
face and although its founder not
opinions, behind
to
they
a
veil
voice
–
do
or
their
so
from
a
black
screen. Hence, I will refer to the creative mind behind the line simply as ‘A.’.
But
why
all
this
secrecy? In the 21st century, fashion
heavily
relies
on
having faces. Labels everywhere are
digits
spending to
designers
and
handwriting products.
seven-figure
acquire
No
all
prominent
have
their
over
less
their
money
is
spent on engaging individuals through of
an
models
standard
of
exclusive
circle
determining beauty.
the
They
strut down runways lined with Hollywood’s shot
by
iconic
the
A-list
and
industry’s
photographers.
perpetuating
message
is
are
most
The
that
this enviable world belongs to
p. 50
taking
Every
clothes,
designed
consumer to live in. The good
of shoes or even a fragrance, shoppers can call a tiny part of
this
world
their
own.
As
him
or
the brand quite literally has its
label
placed
on
her, the customer consequently becomes one of its many faces. Consumption liation. is
facilitates
But
not.
No
symbiosis
number
of
affi–
this
suits
and dresses is ever likely to elevate one’s life to the level of
glamour
so
inexhaustibly
portrayed through advertising. This sphere of perfection is, of course, an illusion whose surface
scratched
can
only
–
if
even
ever
be
touched
at all. To put it more simply: these
brands
are
not
for
customers to own; they are for them to desire. “It
is
Then
there
everybody,”
is
A.
69.
tells
me without hesitation when I enquire about the face of their
brand. It cannot, therefore, be any one person, including the
founder and designer. Footage of
their
Autumn/Winter
presentation Fashion
during
Week
New
2016
York
demonstrates
just how seriously they take
this creed: real people, not models,
are
the
showcasing
their
be
or
to
identities
centre
detail,
marketing
Words by Steffen Michels
news? By buying a shirt, a pair
interview
masks
obscuring
individual
from
and
occasional
cleverly
their
a select few. It is not for the
the
denim
wearers’ faces and preventing
Google search brings up a few mentions in fashion magazines
accompanied
fringed
so
founded in 2011. So highly, in fact,
wearing
skirts
through
defining
Anonymity ranks highly on the
and
time,
the
and
streets
have borne even more fruit. A
me to assume. I cannot but laugh in response. This is when we click.
69
2013
same
traditions of gender seems to
greeted by a black screen. “Oh, I am not using it,” they reply, chuckling as if it had been absurd of
For Everybody and Every Body
in
movement away from what were
well be in different galaxies. “I think there is something wrong with your video,” I announce, upon being
priorities
of
the
of Manhattan. Remarkably, this
in cyberspace. With a time difference of nine hours and the Atlantic Ocean between us, we might as
of
love
dresses
other side's answer to my video call. The founder of Los Angeles – based lifestyle brand 69 and I meet
Californian
around
caught our attention with his
two and a half weeks and my eyes are glued to a computer screen as I am patiently awaiting the
list
market
who,
in
is
suit
stage.
it
the
in
the
actual
purposefully just
about
anyone potentially interested in
the
products.
Shirts
and
trousers are tailored to fit people
regardless
physique.
A
of
main
their
criterion
for all fabrics used is how comfortable they would be to wear
and
how
much
movement
they would allow for people of different builds and genders. Despite terms
their
such
dislike
as
for
‘unisex’
and
‘non-gendered’, A.’s creations are neither designed for nor marketed
towards
a
specific
sex. Anything can be worn by
anyone. No matter what gender
one identifies with, everyone falls
into
‘anyone’.
the
69
is
category thus
of
the
tangent to contemporary dis– cussion: the on-going blurring of male and female.
And
this
blurring
of
lines is mirrored in the way
we consume. In 2016 when cult
US cosmetics brand, CoverGirl, introduced CoverBoy,
the
then
first
ever
17-year-old
James Charles, it seemed makeup was no longer just a female
affair. Appointing the social media
star
momentous for
years
houses
was
step, by
considered
major
launching
a
foreshadowed fashion
men’s
make-
up lines. One pioneer of this trend was Marc Jacobs, whose eponymous
brand
entered
the
sartorial
change
of
letters next to her feminine figure. an
movie
receive
story
often
more
covered,
made-up
style.
revealing
clothing to a more discreet, and
perhaps most critically a less From
normcore
and minimalism to streetwear, female
fashion
in
the
2010’s
has been less about dressing up
and
dressing. to
more
Women
embrace
trend.
about
simply
have
the
started
‘no
make-up’
Interestingly,
development
has
in-hand
with
men
women
this
gone
hand-
significant
breakthroughs for transgender and
world.
Under
across
Barack
the
Obama’s
presidency, the trans community enjoyed
never-before-seen
recognition
in
the
United
States of America. Despite the country’s
reversing its
current the
former
transgender universally attention
government
progress
of
administration, rights
receiving
than
ever
are
more
before.
Transgender individuals are not only serving in the militaries
of more and more countries, but are given the option of a third gender
in
government-issued
documents by countries ranging from
Australia
and
Germany
to, perhaps more surprisingly, India,
Nepal,
Bangladesh. the is to
Pakistan
entertainment
increasingly transgender
narratives.
and
Simultaneously, industry
opening
talent
Award-winning
up
and ac–
tress Laverne Cox of popular
Netflix show Orange Is the New
Black graced the cover of Time
Magazine in 2014, illustrating the issue’s central theme, The Transgender which
Tipping
appeared
in
Point,
capital
the
reassignment
Tom
Hooper’s
The
Danish Girl marked one of the
and
from
in
around
gender
surgery.
racy
movement
theatres
who was amongst the first to
tight,
the
year,
millions
Elbe, the 1930s Danish painter
most
been
following
of
globe was introduced to Lili
the decade in women’s fashion has
The
audience
date by
elaborate
to
an
to
bring the
endeavours
a
to
transgender
masses,
estimated
backed
budget
of
$15 million and an ambitious Hollywood
cast.
Of
course,
the fashion industry has long picked up on this trend, with
the likes of models Lea T, Hari Nef and Andreja Pejić starring
as the faces of Gucci, Givenchy et al.
Yet
one
would
be
a
fool to believe this newfound inclusiveness is not in one way or another rooted in financial motives. As a result, no one
can guarantee its permanence. 69, in contrast, views people
from a different angle. There is
one
nothing to
to
prove
impress.
and
no
Inclusion
comes naturally and their nondemographic approach to design just
so
happens
to
be
shot
against the backdrop of gender fluidity by coincidence. There can be no doubt that if the
label had launched ten years
earlier, it would have been seen as
considerably
than
it
is
more
now.
radical
Certainly,
there is the advantage of its
thematic overlap with current affairs: 69’s democratic ways are in
relevant,
theory
–
seminal
very
and
–
sellable.
But setting the rhythm comes at a price. Talking to A., it becomes
apparent
that
they
would neither like to see their
brand’s message oversimplified by
the
identity,
question nor
of
would
sexual they
want to risk contributing to the
trivialisation
of
social
justice issues for anyone who does grey and
find
area
themselves between
womanhood.
places
great
in
the
manhood
Therefore,
importance
69
on
having
a
sensitivity
to
all
kinds of groups stigmatised by societal
prejudices.
Perhaps
their most notable effort in
this regard is their outspoken embrace
of
older
customers.
Ageism, A. passionately assures me, is a ‘huge topic’ to them. I get the feeling it might be the biggest one.
69
is
not
a
charity.
They are not in the streets,
campaigning for liberal values nor
are
they
making
clothes
to change the world. They are making them out of necessity.
When the label started off as a response to a magazine feature
exploring the global, unifying presence
of
denim,
it
was
born with the idea to produce
clothes for a new generation: one
that
is
overcoming
stereotypes and collaborating in
ways
previously
imaginable.
This
un–
group
of
people is not bound together by by
sex,
any
race,
other
phenomena; their and
it
access
their
influence
religion,
is
to
united
ability
made
through
the
Internet
and
nor
superficial in
information to
possible
wield
only
technological
revolutions of the ubiquitous social
media.
In the truest sense, it's the first age,
term
generation
hence
to
redefining
‘generation’
Naturally,
individuals
this
must
elude
the
itself.
group
require
of a
uniform representative of its unique status. And since it's
so diverse, what could be more
fitting than something that is barely fitted at all?
By being entirely non-
demographic,
69
is
possibly
the label best suited to dress
p. 51