PORTFOLIO + resume
STEPHANIEbaker
[gr]
graduate work
[pf]
professional work
[ug]
Thesis: Resilient Eco-Grids AEC Studio Consult Heavy Timber Studio
Multifamily Rehab Mixed Use + Student Lofts Mixed Use + Residential
undergraduate work
Thesis: Phenomenal Virtuality
04 14 22
28 32 36
40
[ca]
competition awards
[rs]
resume + contact 50
2
AIA YAF 48Hr Competitions
Table of Contents
Stephanie Baker_Portfolio
46
BRIEF | This collection of work is meant to highlight an array of project types, roles played, and methods used in resolving a design or investigating energy conservation strategies. Design is not defined by a single media but rather the deliberate and meaningful collection of creative media to convey an idea. This collection of work illustrates each represented project through graphics, renderings, and text. Each media has its role to play in communicating an idea and none are meant to convey that idea on their own.
BRIEF + about
about | Born in South Alabama and growing up in Atlanta I’ve learned the delicate art of neighbor relations. These Southern origins have cultivated a hospitable demeanor despite my aversion to syrupy sweet sayings and dewy politeness. I shake with a firm hand.
[gr]
This thesis proposes the development of an ‘eco-grid’ to investigate the potential for a community’s collective energy production as a means for commodity exchange, and the determined neighborhood grid’s ability to withstand disruption as a result. Natural resource data collection and the technologies used for collection should be engineered to provide a community within predetermined urban grids their environmental and economic potential.
4
Committee: Mehlika Inanici, PhD Robert B. Pena
M.Arch Thesis
Eco-Grids for Resilient Communities University of Washington | Seattle, WA
SEATTLE washington
disruption: [dis-ruhp-shuh-n] noun 1. the forcible separation or division into parts 2. a disrupted condition 3. a radical change in an industry, business strategy, etc., especially involving the introduction of a new product or service that creates a new market
Problem | Resource knowledge and measurement are disproportionate to the implementation of such metrics into existing and future development for resilient use in the face of disruption. Most communities today are directly or indirectly affected by global industries, whether good or bad, causing local needs to become dependent on international markets, policy and industry. In the face of a community losing a major employer, suffering increased healthcare costs or being hit by a natural disaster the maintaining of place and identity become key to community survival. Communities often lack the ability to sustain major loss or even rebuild afterward due to the heavy burden of sustaining basic needs like loss of electricity, water or structural damage. Even severe economic disruption hinders a community’s ability to maintain basic needs.
6
Natural Gas 10% Nuclear 9% Wind 7% Coal 4% Other 2%
What Ought to Be | Since resources for quantifying energy production are available what ought this mean for future design and development? Resiliency should be at the forefront of planning and design of a community landscape, guiding adaptation to preserve some elements and letting others wane for restrained impact during disruption, while maintaining identity of ‘place’. Goals and Objectives | Goals for this thesis are establishing a framework for an ‘eco-grid’ model and incentivizing adoption and energy transparency within the community. In order to meet the goals the objectives set include calculating energy consumption of the community, determining solar potential for each building, and resolving the discrepancy between consumption and production values. In all, what level of ‘business as usual’ can be achieved? And to what degree?
Identification of Occupancy Types
Occupany Analysis | Breaking down these numbers by building type aims to identify the greatest energy users and the most frequent building types within the site. The chart on the right page illustrates these findings. Hospitals, by far, use the most energy where single family and low rise residential buildings are the most frequent building type in the site. Also, comparing the building counts with the total square footages by type we find that mid- and low-rise residential have the most square feet by type in the designated ecogrid. Understanding that the eco-grid’s production potential is significantly less than its consumption - what would happen in the event of a natural disaster? How would this affect energy resources when broken down into seasons? If disruption occurs in winter versus summer what is the impact?
Identification of Critical Zones (CZ)
CZ 01 CZ 02 CZ 03 CZ 04
8
BANK/FINANCIAL GOVERNMENT [POLICE/FIRE/ETC] CONVENIENCE STORE/GAS WAREHOUSE/INDUSTRIAL UTILITY MEDICAL OFFICE HOSPITAL RELIGIOUS PARKING GARAGE MIXED USE PROPERTY RESTAURANT GROCERY/MARKET RETAIL OFFICE - LARGE OFFICE-SMALL GYM/SPORTS FACILITY EDUCATION [UNIVERSITY] EDUCATION [K-12] RESIDENTIAL [MID-RISE MULTI] RESIDENTIAL [DORM/GROUP] RESIDENTIAL [SINGLE FAMILY] RESIDENTIAL [LOW-RISE MULTI] 4,000,000 450
3,500,000 400
350
3,000,000
300
2,500,000
250
2,000,000 200
1,500,000 150
1,000,000 100
500,000 50
0
Total Count and Sqft by Building Type
0
50,000,000
100,000,000
150,000,000
200,000,000
250,000,000
300,000,000
Total Energy Use (kBtu/sf) by Building Type
350,000,000
Annual Analysis | After gathering the site
and building data and running calculations the total annual energy production potential resulted in 543.9 million kBu compared to 921.3 million kBu in current estimated consumption. The site is analyzed on a blockby-block level when calculating consumption and production values. This approach means that a mixture of occupancy types are calculated together so the representation of generalized use and production to the right is a reflection of this analysis. The annual analysis represented here shows that particular blocks within the site are capable of generating more electricity through use of photovoltaics than other blocks due to their quantity and availability of rooftops. In the consumption illustration there is one block (Block 66) showing an outstanding amount of consumption compared to the other blocks in the site. This block includes a hospital, which shown in an earlier EUI chart is the highest energy consuming occupancy.
10
Annual Critical Consumption and Production CRITICAL ZONE 1 Production CRITICAL ZONE 1 Consumption CZ 2 Production CZ 2 Consumption CZ 3 Production CZ 3 Consumption CZ 4 Production CZ 4 Consumption
Seasonal Critical Consumption and Production WINTER
CZ 1 Production CZ 1 Consumption CZ 2 Production CZ 2 Consumption CZ 3 Production CZ 3 Consumption CZ 4 Production CZ 4 Consumption
SPRING
CZ 1 Production CZ 1 Consumption CZ 2 Production CZ 2 Consumption CZ 3 Production CZ 3 Consumption CZ 4 Production CZ 4 Consumption
FALL
CZ 1 Production CZ 1 Consumption CZ 2 Production CZ 2 Consumption CZ 3 Production CZ 3 Consumption CZ 4 Production CZ 4 Consumption
Elevation View of Site
Energy Production by Block
ENERGY IN kBtu PRODUCED
CZ 1 Production CZ 1 Consumption CZ 2 Production CZ 2 Consumption CZ 3 Production CZ 3 Consumption CZ 4 Production CZ 4 Consumption
ENERGY IN kBtu CONSUMED
SUMMER
921.3M
543.9M
Energy Consumption by Block
161 138 115
ENERGY IN kBtu CONSUMED
184
249M
231M
ENERGY IN kBtu PRODUCED
207
ENERGY IN kBtu CONSUMED
230
ENERGY IN kBtu PRODUCED
253 million kBtu
92
201M
171M
69 46 23
SUMMER | Consumption SUMMER | Consumption
SUMMER | Production SUMMER | Production
SUMMER ANALYSIS [06/01-08/31]
SPRING | Consumption SPRING | Consumption
SPRING | Production SPRING | Production
SPRING ANALYSIS [03/01-05/31]
93% of production meeting current consumption demands.
Occupancy type reductions easily meet Critical Zones 1 & 2 energy demands without significant community-wide reduction protocol.
85% of production meeting current consumption demands. Occupancy type reductions easily meet Critical Zones 1 & 2 energy demands without significant community-wide reduction protocol.
Zones to maintain the following consumption percentages in moment of disruption:
Zones to maintain the following consumption percentages in moment of disruption:
Critical Zone 01 = 100% Critical 12 Zone 02 = 100% Critical Zone 03 = 90% Critical Zone 04 = 80%
Critical Zone 01 = 100% Critical Zone 02 = 100% Critical Zone 03 = 76% Critical Zone 04 = 70%
* Block heights illustrated below represent total kBtu/sf of energy consumed or produced. Heights are modeled with 1 foot in height representing 1 kBtu/sf
230M 93M
FALL | Production Production SUMMER
FALL ANALYSIS [09/01-11/30]
ENERGY IN kBtu PRODUCED
ENERGY IN kBtu PRODUCED
FALL || Consumption Consumption SUMMER
ENERGY IN kBtu CONSUMED
| Completing the analysis of the established eco-grid’s energy potential through photovoltaic use compared to its consumption amounts shows drastic discrepancies within fall and winter seasons. The introduction of utilizing surface lots within the site for additional PV use was just one way that the production needs could be supplemented. Upon final review and discussion many ideas have been proposed for further research and study.
ENERGY IN kBtu CONSUMED
Seasonal Analysis
WINTER | Consumption SUMMER | Consumption
242M 47M
WINTER | Production SUMMER | Production
WINTER ANALYSIS [12/01-02/28]
41% of production meeting current consumption demands.
Occupancy type reductions meet a majority of Critical Zone 1 energy demands with significant community-wide conservation in other zones.
20% of production meeting current consumption demands. Occupancy type reductions DO NOT meet Critical Zone 1 energy demands even with significant community-wide reduction protocol.
Zones to maintain the following consumption percentages in moment of disruption:
Zones to maintain the following consumption percentages in moment of disruption:
Critical Zone 01 = 80% Critical Zone 02 = 50% Critical Zone 03 = 20% Critical Zone 04 = 0%
Critical Zone 01 = 38% Critical Zone 02 = 20% Critical Zone 03 = 10% Critical Zone 04 = 0%
This AEC Studio focused on BIMbased collaboration between architecture, engineering and construction. Design teams within the undergrad architecture studio included graduate ‘consultants’ that assisted in developing design proposals for cost, constructibility, energy, daylighting and value.
[gr]
14
The studio tackled the design of a replacement for Blakely Elementary School in the Bainbridge Island school district. A recently completed school in the same district, Wilkes Elementary, provides the detailed program and sets the bar for performance in the categories of site/environmental design, spatial ingenuity, structural economy, program distribution, energy efficiency, and cost. The challenge was to design for different site conditions and to consider different materials (even innovative ones) and systems to try to attain a better performance value in as many ways as possible.
Role: Graduate High Performance consultant to undergrad AEC studio class
2017_AEC Studio
Fort Blakely Elementary School
BAINBRIDGE ISLAND washington
Massing | Sky lights at the North classroom
Annually Overlit | South-facing corridors
and hallways are generally overlit without any shading devices employed. Gymnasium is consistently overlit throughout the school year and will need special shading design implemented along glazed facade perimeter.
Scale represents the percentage of time areas receive over 3000 lux illuminance values over an annual basis.
CYCLE 2 | High Performance
Annually Underlit | In the initial design, early mornings and winter months presented an issue with receiving adequate daylighting in the North-facing classrooms, although illuminance values represented here include values between 100 and 300 lux, which are still reasonable amounts of light for reading and general tasks. MASSING
Scale represents the percentage of time areas receive less than 300 lux illuminance values over an Sky lights at the north classroom walls annual basis.
16
assroom walls ght without g along corridors e glare issues but
CYCLE 2 | High Performance
walls provide a good deal of light without substantial glare. Glazing along corridors and around the gym pose glare issues but offer a unique design opportunity for incorporating shading devices.
provide a good deal of light without substantial glare. Glazing along corridors and around the gym pose glare issues but offer a unique design opportunity for incorporating shading devices.
OVERLIT | Areas annually overlit
Scale represents the percentage of time
MASSING Sky lights at the north classroom walls provide a good deal of light without substantial glare. Glazing along corridors and around the gym pose glare issues but offer a unique design opportunity for incorporating shading devices.
OVERLIT | Areas annually overlit OVERLIT | Scale 0-100%
OVERLIT | Areas annually overlit
Scale represents the percentage of time areas receive over 3000 lux illuminance values over an annual basis.
South-facing corridors and hallways are generally overlit without any shading devices employed. Gymnasium is consistently overlit throughout the scho year and will need special shading desig implemented along the glazed facade perimeter.
UNDERLIT | Areas annually underlit
Scale represents the percentage of time areas receive over 3000 lux illuminance values over an annual basis.
Scale represents the percentage of time areas receive less than 300 lux illuminance values over an annual basis.
South-facing corridors and hallways are generally overlit without any shading devices employed. Gymnasium is consistently overlit throughout the school year and will need special shading design implemented along the glazed facade perimeter.
Early mornings and winter months prese a possible issue with receiving daylightin in the North-facing classrooms, although illuminance values represented here include values between 100 and 300 lux, which are still reasonable amounts of ligh for reading and general tasks.
UNDERLIT | Areas annually underlit UNDERLIT | Scale 0-100% Scale represents the percentage of time
NOITATNEIRO GNISSAM ot ecnatsid tesffo muminim a htiw dengised sgniw gnidliuB .rehtona eno gniwodahsrevo tneverp
27 BUILDING ORIENTATION & CONSTRUCTION LOCATION -
East-West oriented classroom “bars” to maximize North & South natural daylighting
-
Building footprint located on previous building site to avoid tree extraction and any potential overshadowing of the building.
Orientation & Site Location | East-West oriented classroom “bars” were designed to maximize North & South natural daylighting. The building footprint located on a previous building site to avoid tree extraction and any potential overshadowing of the building. Massing Orientation | Building wings are
designed with a minimum offset distance to prevent overshadowing one another in winter months.
71 MASSING ORIENTATION -
Building wings designed with a minimum offset distance to prevent overshadowing one another.
-
Shading Devices
CYCLE 3 | High Performance
| South exterior wall implements stationary horizontal louvers installed inside the glazing surface to shade direct sunlight during harsh months but trap solar heat gain to be used for passive heating of the classrooms.
18
SUMMER Summer [June 21st] Jun 21st
SHADING DEVICES [Class+Corridor] -
South exterior wall implements stationary horizontal louvers installed inside the glazing surface to shade direct sunlight during harsh months but trap solar heat gain to be used for passive heating of the classrooms.
Classrooms also utilize manually operable louvers that would only need to be closed during winter months to prevent glare, but offer some heating in the classroom during the cooler months.
SPRING/FALL Spring/Fall [March 21st/Sept 21st] Mar 21st/Sept 21st
Classrooms also utilize manually operable louvers that would only need to be closed during winter months to prevent glare, but offer some heating in the classroom during these cooler months.
-
An angled wall at the North is designed to bounce sunlight from the skylights into the classrooms during the year while providing playful moments for reading nooks in the classroom.
WINTER Winter [January Jan 21st 21st]
An angled wall at the North is designed to bounce sunrays from the skylights into the classroom during the year while providing playful moments for reading nooks in the classroom.
Classroom_Summer Daylight Simulation
Corridor_Summer Daylight Simulation
Classroom_Winter Daylight Simulation
Corridor_Spring Daylight Simulation
96
Outdoor Relative Humidity & Temperature
Indoor Relative Humidity & Temperature Without HVAC Employed
Humidity + Temperature | The psychrometric chart shown on the right illustrates the indoor relative humidity and temperature without any air conditioning or heating activated in the building. The psychrometric chart to the left illustrates outdoor humidity and temperature conditions of Seattle. The highlighted region in both charts is the collection of hours in the year that fall within a comfortable humidity and temperature threshold. Adiabatic surfaces were not included in the calculations to test extreme limits of the building design. *Adiabatic: relating to or denoting a process or condition in which heat does not enter or leave the system concerned. Ex: adjoining rooms or slab floor where heat transfer is limited or nonexistent.
Useful Daylight Illuminance [Ideal]
>300<3000 lux Completely daylit/Autonomous 77% occupied hours
January Clear Sky UDI [Exceeding] Imperceptable Glare >3000 23% lux Glare (vertical surface)
7% Need Supplemental 5% Too Low 11% Too High/Glary 77% Ideal Daylighting
UDI [Supplemental]
Daylit Ratio by Occupancy Hours Analysis Grid @ 30â&#x20AC;? AFF
20
ZONE 2 | Classrooms
% Annual Occupied Hours
CYCLE 3 | High Performance
Shading methods required 11% occupied hours
>100<300 lux Some electric lighting needed 7% occupied hours
January Overcast Sky No/Imperceptable Glare
Classroom task area is daylit 77% of the annual occupied school hours from September through June.
UDI [Low]
<100 lux Electric lighting required 5% occupied hours
90
[gr]
22
Overview | This Heavy Timber studio focused on a singular design project aimed at forging more direct relationships among the education, research, and industry sectors with the local communty. This intellectual playground proposes to facilitate dialogue on timber production and use, carbon research, policy initiatives, and general environmental outreach. A Center for Wood Innovation highrise building constructed under the proposed 2021 IBC Type IV construction allowances is depicted in the following pages.
2016_Heavy Timber Studio UW Wood Innovation Center
SEATTLE washington
24
Site | The site is located at the south end of
Rainier Vista next to Winkenwerder Hall and Bloedel Hall at the University of Washington. Because the existing university buildings on the site are at a significantly smaller scale to the 12-story Wood Innovation Center the location of this new structure is placed just south of Winkenwerder in keeping with the current site grid. Access to the Burke-Gilman trail is easily accessible and the location of the building creates a unique opportunity to activate this generally less-than-popular campus site.
Design Concept | The building design is a simple extrusion of two rectangles one oriented to the Winkenwerder-Bloedel grid and the other oriented due South (also parallel to the Burke-Gilman). The competing extrusions are carved away at strategic locations with respect to the interior program. The consistently glazed vertical element at the south end of the building is home to a vertical greenhouse. This area remains public at every floor for students, educators, professionals and the community to use.
26
Type IV Building Code | The diagramatic
representation of the 2015 International Building Codeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s requirements for heavy timber structures is illustrated here. The comparison models represent the 2021 IBC code revision proposal. Chapter 3 classifies a buildingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s occupancy. For this study only the occupancies Business (Group B), Education (Group E) and Residential (Group R) are used. Because IBC 2021 establishes a new set of building types within Type IV only Groups B and R will be studied per each Type IV subcategory. Some examples of Group B include offices and higher education post K-12. Group R includes typical residences as well as student housing.
Interior Renders | The aim for the interior spaces was to maintain consistent exposure of the CLT structure. The center and bottom renders show two locations within the ground floor where a lounge and cafe space provide a common place for the community to gather and an informal meeting area located at the base of the vertical greenhouse. A large theatre space was a programming requirement which provided a unique structural challenge as a heavy timber structure would require sizable columns to be located within the seating space, and thus considerably block views. This render shows a column-free theatre due to the location of it occupying the top two floors of the building where larger structural beams could be incorporated without compromising lower floor structure or floor-to-ceiling heights.
Phase 1 | 181 units, 21 buildings Phase 2 | 177 units, 22 buildings Phase 3 | 185 units, 23 buildings [pf]
28
This extensive interior and exterior renovation primarily focused on general finish and design updates on units as well as meeting sustainability measures per EarthCraft certification process requested by client.
Role: Project Manager
Professional Work
Centennial Place Apts | Atlanta, GA Geheber Lewis Associates
ATLANTA georgia
THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE THE ARCHITECT, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR US WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. THIS DRAWING SHALL NO
©COPYRIGHT 2016 GEHEBER LEWIS ASSOCIATES, LLC.
THIS DRAWING IS A THE ARCHITECT, A WITHOUT THE CON
©COPYRIGHT 2016
RELEASE DATES: REV # DATE
DESCRIPTION
04/13/16
REVIEW SET
05/04/16
REVIEW SET RELEASE
06/06/16
LDP REVIEW REV #SED
08/22/16
PERMIT SET 04/1
05/0
06/0
08/2
STAMP:
STAMP:
CLIENT:
CENTENNIAL PLAC DEVELOPER, LLC CLIENT: 191 PEACHTREE ST ATLANTA, GA 30303 CENT DEVE PROJECT: 191 P ATLA CENTENNIAL PLA PHASEPROJECT III
248 MERRITTSCEN A ATLANTA, GA 303
24 ATL DRAWING TITLE:
EXISTING DETAIL DRAWING
30
EX
DRAWN BY:
SCALE:
AS NOTED
DATE:
08/2
DRAWN B
PROJECT NUMBER:
1432
DRAWING NUMBER:
SCALE:
A7
AS NO
PROJECT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTIO
DRAWING
*
1
A3-0.1
WH
F ELEC. PANEL
PROPOSED CEILING REMOVAL LOCATIONS Responsibilities | Organized and lead2 PROP TYPE "A" BREEZEWAY BUILDING TYPE TYPE UFAS TYPE&"A" BREEZEWAY FHA BUILDINGS: inspection walks and sent 1/8" = 1'-0" A3-0.1 1/8" = 1'-0" E9, H1, H5, H7, H11 detailed E6, reports ofH8, walks to client to ensure proper record keeping. ELECTRIC ELECTRIC WATER HEATER WH
ELECTRICAL PANEL PORTION OF CEILING TO BE REMOVED LOCATION OF CURRENT SOFFIT DROP WALL MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER NEW FREON CHASE
F
F
ELECTRIC FURNACE
ELEC. PANEL
WH
AREAS OF GYP BOARD REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT
Met with City of Atlanta Fire Chief to propose ELEC. re-addressing apartments to better facilitate PANEL emergency service access to buildings. Established new building and unit addresses for complex [approval granted by Fire Chief]. Coordinated with Southface EarthCraft sustainability certification program. Attended all blower door tests and inspections during cetification process to ensure all efficiency efforts were met by contractor.
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
PORTION TO BE RE
LOCATIO SOFFIT D
WALL MO EXTINGU
NEW FRE
Lead weekly punch walks and monthly HUD pay application meetings with the owner and contractor. Developed concentrated demo removal plans for contractor to ease in quantifying labor and material estimates. Designed new interior renovation layouts for each unit type, produced construction documents & specifications. AIA,
HUD
and
contract
F
Prepared all documents.
EL PA
*
1
PROPOSED CEILING REMOVAL LOCATIONS TYPE "A" BREEZEWAY BUILDING TYPE
2
PROPOSED CE TYPE "B" BREE
137 units, 4 buildings
[pf]
32
Capricorn Records was the home to numerous Southern rock bands including the Allman Brothers and Stillwater and was the first label to carry, then unknown, Widespread Panick and Kenny Chesney. The abandoned iconic studio in Macon, Georgia is part of a restoration effort along with an expansive mixed-use development to revitalize the music studioâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s former neighborhood.
Role: Project Manager
Professional Work
Capricorn Lofts | Macon, GA Geheber Lewis Associates
MACON georgia
34
Responsibilities | Coordinated with future restaurant and retail lessees on 15,000 sqft ground floor space layout. Designed series of 1-3 bedroom apartment type layouts, and garage unit apartments. Designed multilevel leasing and amenity layouts. Coordinated with engineers and surveyors through all phases of design. Reviewed and redlined all consultant drawings. Provided developer with marketing material and renderings. Responsible for material selections along with quantifying material estimates. Produced construction documents & specifications.
146 units, 2 buildings Mercer University in Macon, Georgia has steadily grown over the past years most recently attracting students in the medical and law fields. The growth in the student body created a need for additional graduate housing within downtown Macon but without alienating the daily shoppers and restaurant patrons around. [pf]
36
The Lofts at College Hill were designed to feature a mixed-use ground floor for students and the surrounding community to mingle within while graduate students are offered luxury apartments or lofts on the floors above.
Role: Job Captain
Professional Work
Lofts at College Hill | Macon, GA Geheber Lewis Associates
MACON georgia
ALUM. STOREFRONT WINDOWS
3
BRICK SILL
13
METAL UTILITY DOOR
4
CORRUGATED METAL
14
METAL CANOPY
5
CEMENT FIBER BOARD REVEAL PANEL
15
SCUPPER w/ DOWNSPOUT
6
4" REVEAL CEMENT FIBER BOARD SIDING
16
NOT USED
7
8" REVEAL CEMENT FIBER BOARD SIDING
17
EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE
8
42" HIGH MTL. OR PVC GUARD RAILING
18
BUILDING SIGNAGE
9
VINYL. CLAD WINDOW
19
PARAPET CAP FLASHING
10
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
20
SECURITY GATE
STOREFRONT STOREFRONT DOORS @ DOORS WINDOWS CORRIDORS
7'-8"
UPPER PARAPET
WINDOWS
GROUND FLOOR
8'-2" A.F.F.
8'-2" A.F.F.
6'-8" A.F.F.
7'-6" A.F.F.
UPPER FLOORS
----
7'-6" A.F.F.
6'-8" A.F.F.
7'-6" A.F.F. 10'-77 8"
2
LEVEL ROOF TRUSS BEARING
1'-63 4"
9'-11 8"
3 1
LOWER PARAPET
14'-03 4"
1'-83 4"
NOTE: ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR (A.F.F.) INDICATES TOP OF SLAB AND TOP OF GYP-CRETE POUR. G.C. TO VERIFY WITH DOOR SCHEDULES. PROVIDE METAL CANOPY ABOVE EVERY BREEZEWAY ENTRANCE.
T.O. DECKING
LEVEL 4
TRUSS BEARING
T.O. DECKING
LEVEL 3
TRUSS BEARING
LEVEL 2 1'-0"
NOTE: SEE STRUCTURAL FOR CANOPY ATTACHMENT DETAILS AND BLOCKING REQUIREMENTS SEE ESR REPORT (ESR-1668) TABLE 2 ON PAGE 4 VERTICAL SIDING FOR CEMENT FIBER BOARD PANEL FASTENER REQIREMENTS
22'-0"
12
3'-0"
BRICK BAND - SOLDIER
3'-6"
2
TOP OF DOOR & WINDOW LEGEND LOCATION
2'-6"
ALUM. STOREFRONT DOORS
9'-11 8"
11
9'-11 8"
BRICK
12'-4"
KEY PLAN
ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1
PARKING LEVEL 2
THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE SCALED.
10'-77 8"
©COPYRIGHT 2014 GEHEBER LEWIS ASSOCIATES, LLC.
1'-0"
LEVEL 1 PARKING LEVEL 1
5
2 SIM
A6-3
A7-8
5 8
A6-4 4 SIM
2A
A7-8
A7-7
A7-8
A7-7
A7-7
5
4
4 SIM
A7-8
A7-7
A7-7
1 A5-1
BLDG 1- WEST ELEVATION 5SIM A6-1
THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE SCALED.
RELEASE DATES:
4
3/32" = 1'-0"
14
STAIR #4 STAIR #4 STAIR #4 STAIR #4
18
A7-9
©COPYRIGHT 2014 GEHEBER LEWIS ASSOCIATES, LLC.
REV # DATE 12
4
DESCRIPTION
01/07/14
DESIGN REVIEW SET
02/19/14
UPPER PARAPET
5
LOWER PARAPET
2'-0"
2 SIM
9
2A
LEVEL ROOF
PERMIT SET
1
03/19/14
BID SET
2
05/09/14
CONSTRUCTION SET
2'-6"
4'-0"
2A
A7-7 6
5
3
A6-4
7'-8"
3
2A
6
1A BREEZEWAY STAIR #4 1A BREEZEWAY STAIR #4 1D BREEZEWAY STAIR #4 1A BREEZEWAY STAIR #4
3'-0"
1A 1A 1D 1A
1'-63 4" 12'-4"
22'-0"
LEVEL 2
22'-0"
1'-0"
LEVEL 2 PARKING LEVEL 2
20
10'-77 8"
9'-11 8"
9'-11 8"
LEVEL 3
TRUSS BEARING
NOTE: REFER TO A7-22 FOR SITE WALL ELEVATION
BID SET
2
05/09/14
CONSTRUCTION SET
10'-77 8"
03/19/14
1'-63 4"
9'-11 8"
14 T.O. DECKING LEVEL 3
PERMIT SET
1
10'-77 8"
TRUSS BEARING
9'-11 8"
LEVEL 4
DESIGN REVIEW SET
02/19/14
1'-83 4"
T.O. DECKING LEVEL 4
DESCRIPTION
01/07/14
14'-03 4"
3'-6" 1'-63 4"
9'-11 8"
LEVEL 5
9'-11 8" 1'-83 4"
10'-77 8"
REV # DATE
LEVEL ROOF
12'-4"
14'-03 4"
RELEASE DATES:
LOWER PARAPET
TRUSS BEARING
9'-11 8"
2'-6"
9'-0"
3'-0"
UPPER PARAPET
STAMP:
20
1'-0"
LEVEL 1 PARKING LEVEL 1
STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR
#4 #4 1B #4 1B #4 1D #4 1D
1B 2A 1B 2A 1D 2D 1D 2D
2A 2A 2A 2A-HC 2D 2D 2D 2D
5
4
12
17
1B 2A 1B 2A 1A 2A 1D 2D
2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2D 2D
2A STAIR #2 2B 2A STAIR #2 2B 2A STAIR #2 2B 2D STAIR #2 RETAIL
2B 2B 2B RETAIL
STAMP:
CLIENT:
3/32" = 1'-0"
14
3
1B 1B 1B 1B 1A 1A 1D 1D
A5-2
BLDG 1- SOUTH ELEVATION
2 A5-1
1B 2A STAIR #3 1B 2A-HC STAIR #3 1A 2D STAIR #3 1D 2D STAIR #3
7
18
3 SIM
1 SIM
2 SIM
4 SIM.
2 SIM
A7-10
A7-10
A7-8
A7-7
A7-8
12
5
4
5
9
11
7
6
5
4
3
2 SIM
2
A7-8
A7-7
A7-7
3 SIM A7-10
4 A7-9
SIERRA DEVELOPMENT MACON, GA
3'-0"
UPPER PARAPET
3'-6"
LOWER PARAPET
9'-11 8"
LEVEL 4
T.O. DECKING
LEVEL 3
PROJECT:
DRAWING TITLE:
LOFTS AT COLLEGE HILL
TRUSS BEARING
BUILDING 1
1305 & 1345 ELEVATIONS HARDEMAN AVENUE MACON, GA
23'-0"
10'-77 8"
T.O. DECKING TRUSS BEARING
9'-11 8" 1'-63 4" 1'-83 4"
10'-77 8"
LOFTS AT COLLEGE HILL 1305 & 1345 HARDEMAN AVENUE MACON, GA
LEVEL 5
12'-4"
14'-03 4"
SIERRA DEVELOPMENT MACON, GA PROJECT:
TRUSS BEARING
T.O. DECKING
9'-11 8"
1 A5-1
CLIENT:
TRUSS BEARING
1'-63 4"
9'-11 8"
2'-6"
LEVEL ROOF
DRAWN BY:
8"
LEVEL 2
DRAWING TITLE:
GRADE
2B 1B 2B 1B 2B 1B RETAIL RETAIL
2B 2B 2B RETAIL
3 A5-1
38
1B 1A 1B 1A 1B 1A RETAIL RETAIL
1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A RETAIL RETAIL
1A 1B 1A 1B 1A 1A RETAIL RETAIL
1B 1B 1B 1B 1A 1A RETAIL RETAIL
1B 2A 1B 2A 1A 2A RETAIL RETAIL
2A 2B 2A 2B 2A 2B RETAIL RETAIL
2B 2B 2B RETAIL
DATE:
SCALE:
BUILDING AS NOTED 1A PLAN 05/09/2014 PROJECT NUMBER: 5 1308 LEVEL DRAWING NUMBER:
BLDG 1- EAST ELEVATION
DRAWN BY:
3/32" = 1'-0"
A5-1
CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: RELEASED FOR 2 A5-1
AS NOTED PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWING NUMBER:
05/09/2014 1308
A3-3
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Responsibilities | Assisted in coordination with future restaurant and retail layouts. Designed series of 1-3 bedroom apartment type layouts for each floor level. Designed leasing and amenity layout plans. Assisted in coordination with engineers and surveyors through all phases of design. Reviewed and redlined all consultant drawings. Produced construction documents & specifications. Attended all AOC meetings and site visits. Photo credit: Max Kovtoun, Geheber Lewis Associates
Abstract | A dissection into the
pathologies of modernity and their societal and artistic trends has led to the research of their resulting production and design of spaces and ultimately the way in which our current society has shaped the way we interact phenomenally. What would our physical environment look like - how would it be inhabited - if the same qualities and characteristics of digital and technological interaction and communication were implemented? What would be the result if we were to replicate characteristics of interaction through digital filters into built form?
[ug]
40
The proposal to engage the voyeuristic nature of society aims to answer the question of how phenomenal space could replicate the digital nature of interaction and inhabitation within our current society.
Committee: Tony Rizzuto, Dept. Chair Manole Voroneanu
B.Arch Thesis
Phenomenal Virtuality Kennesaw State University
PHYSICAL-VIRTUAL installation
virtual: [vir-tu-al] adj 1. being such in essence or effect though not formally recognized or admitted
On Some Motifs in Baudelaire Walter Benjamin
2. of, relating to, or using virtual memory 3. of, relating to, or being a hypothetical particle whose existence is inferred from indirect evidence 4. being on or simulated on a computer or computer network: as a: occuring or existing primarily online b: of, relating to, or existing within a virtual reality
virtual consciousness adj 1. the state of being characterized by sensation, emotion, volition and thought through the negation of phenomenal conditions
Introduction | The flaneur is one who inserts
himself within the space of society but actively removes himself from participation for the purpose of maintaining his role as an invisible observer. Written during an acute junction in the development of the metropolis, Walter Benjamin’s excerpts on the flaneur detail this state of being as a provision of modernity. But what of the notion of a contemporary flaneur? He engages not the arcades of Paris but a virtual world of his choice where he is afforded the ability to adopt alternate personas or Sims at will. This form of technological meditation is not limited to gaming but has become a common cipher in our everyday existence through the proliferation of media in the form of smart phones, social media and gaming. The manner and characteristic of interaction along with systems of design in our contemporary era is the result of our exploration and acceptance of a new form of space: virtual space. This idea of ‘virtual’ is the perception of occupying a space or situation that one does not physically occupy.
Medaman Medaman
Improvisation Group [Tokyo]
15
Contemporary Flaneur
Interaction Through Technological Filter
17 42
Pathologies of Modernity | The research of the pathologies of modernity and their corresponding societal psychological disorders led to the investigation of the nature of the contemporary epoch and the idea of designing physical space that would mimic the experiential nature of technological virtuality. A societal schizophrenia is the trend of a group of individuals to take on a multiplicity of roles or identities within society. The flaneur could be used as an example of the postmodern trend for society to take on a set of different ‘masks’ while participating in the greater whole of society as an observer. The schizophrenic tendency in the postmodern era is a transformation of a conglomerate of individuals to adopt a multiplicity of attitudes and identities. The paranoid social state is what is most often attributed to the modernist era. Modernist social paranoia charaterizes itself through its rationalistic and lucid tendencies, like that of Le Corbusier’s designs for urban planning. The modernist era is one that is sytemetized and ordered socially so as not allow deviation or any outlier in its preset social norms. Within our contemporary epoch we are found to be hysterical according to philosopher Slavoj Zizek. Hysteria is defined through cyberspace - that the contemporary social tendency is for people to act and react toward one another through a new form of ‘space’.
Human Scale & View | Using the angles of view from a perforated vertical wall without alteration, studies were made maintaining the original views as a constant and the wall a variable. The first iteration of studies manipulates the wall by thickening its dimensions in areas and segmenting the wall where the perforations are located. The second iteration explores the angle in which the wall could be manipulated according to the views and perforations. Thirdly, the wall is divided into rotating sections that allow a person to engage the wall and gain a maximum viewing angle of the original constant. This provides a user with a limited amount of control in engagement. Wall Sections + Playing with Views |
This series of models explores the range of possible perforations or manipulation of wall sections that may engage a viewer. The first five models are a study on the engineering of a view based on specific angles, heights and measurements (30, 45, 60 and a constant viewing height of 66â&#x20AC;?). The last five models are a series without constants, created solely through playful manipulation. The resulting direction the models will take in the next study will yield a play on manipulating the voyeuristic gaze and disorienting perceptions of what may or may not be seen.
The Installation | The installation proposes a similar voyeruistic experience to interacting with the private lives of people technologically. The one being viewed on one side is generally aware that they, in turn, are being viewed. What is unknown is the person viewing them, the point at which they may be viewed and the availablility of opportunity to view their voyeur from another angle. This game of shifting view, positions, people and scenes mimicks the parameters we live in our virtually concious minds.
44
[ca]
46
2nd Place | Individual Submission Work published in Design Equilibrium Magazine, 2017
2016_Awards
AIA Atlanta YAF 48Hr Competition
48
Finalist | Team Submission [w/ John Valentine] Work published in Design Equilibrium Magazine, 2015
2014_Awards
AIA Atlanta YAF 48 Hr Competition
1st Place | Team Submission [w/ John Valentine] Work published in Design Equilibrium Magazine, 2013
2012_Awards
AIA Atlanta YAF 48Hr Competition
EDUCATION 2017 | University of Washington 2012 | Kennesaw State University Summer 2011 | Hoschule Anhalt
Master of Architecture in High Performance Building Thesis: Eco-grids for Resilient Communities Bachelor of Architecture Study Abroad - Dessau, Germany Thesis: Phenomenal Virtuality
EXPERIENCE Summer 2017 | New Buildings Institute Program Analyst
Research position developing prescriptive energy code measures for a 40% energy reach code beyond ASHRAE 90.1 and IECC 2015 baselines.
2013-17 | Geheber Lewis Associates Job Captain
Focus on multi-family new construction, rehab and renovation projects in the Southeast. Responsibilities include production of construction documents, specifications, planning and design, development of projects, analysis, reporting of project results and coordination with various consultants and government agencies. Example Project Experience Centennial Place Apartments | Atlanta, GA Project Manager. Identified and prioritized scope of work for HUD rehab project, produced construction documents and specifications. Specialized in UFAS and FHA redesign of residential units. Coordinated with Southface EarthCraft program and HUD, Department of Community Affairs and Atlanta Housing Authority design reviews. Lead accessibility, punch walk and monthly HUD review walks throughout construction phasing. Capricorn Lofts | Macon, GA Project Manager. Responsible for directing team, coordination with consultants, production of construction documents & specifications and producing project reports and marketing materials.
2012-13 | Hyer Creative Intern Architect
Focus on restuarant and retail construction documents, material selection and specifications, graphic design for marketing materials and rendering/post processing of project designs. Worked with interior design department on select interior retrofits. Traveled to restaurant site locations throughout Georgia and Alabama for as-built measurement collection and documentation.
2006-12 | Project Management & Marketing, Inc Building Construction Intern
Assistant to developer and builder during site selection, demographic and civil engineering studies of community development. Collaborated with the marketing director to create logo design, website, and marketing plan to produce advertising collateral for client review. Collected material samples for mock-up and material boards. Designed veranda for community pool and clubhouse and assisted with changes to architectural plans for homes. Responsible for bookkeeping, accounting and scheduling.
PROFICIENCY
AWARDS
[rs]
50
678 | 925 | 0489
stephanie.s.baker@gmail.com www.linkedin.com/in/bakerstev
Resume + Contact
AutoCAD Revit Rhino Sketchup Adobe Suite (ps, id, ai, br) Grasshopper DIVA ArchSim EnergyPlus Climate Consultant Ecotect Photosphere HDR Scope Comfen
2017
CBE End of Year Show | Outstanding Masters Thesis University of Washington - College of Built Environments
2016
AIA Atlanta - YAF 48Hr Competition | 2nd Place Work published in 2017 edition of Atlantaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Design Equilibrium magazine
2013
AIA Atlanta - YAF 48Hr Competition | 1st Place Work published in 2014 edition of Atlantaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Design Equilibrium magazine
2012
Year End Studio Competition | Thesis Competition Finalist Kennesaw State University - School of Architecture
Stephanie Baker_LEED Green Associate