Project Cornerstone Status Report

Page 1

Whole Questiontoday imaginetomorrow createforthefuture

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs. 30 MAY 2023
of the
Committee

AGENDA

▪ WHY WE ARE HERE

▪ Identify the BEST VALUE solution for St. Louis County

▪ WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED

▪ Review the Discovery process and findings

▪ WHERE WE ARE IN TASK 1: IDENTIFY PROCESS

▪ Review project recommendation and delivery methods

▪ NEXT STEPS

MAKING THE SMART INVESTMENT FOR BETTER SERVICE AND BETTER SECURITY

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

BACKGROUND learned status next steps
This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs. Why we are here 3 BACKGROUND learned status next steps

“Hybrid work environments support our organization and our people. They provide our staff flexibility and freedom with stability and camaraderie… a winwin!”

PROJECTBACKGROUND

PROJECT CORNERSTONE: Modernize and consolidate the central Administration building and satellite sites to improve customer service and maximize efficiency

▪ Mandated by City of Clayton building and fire code by January 1, 2028

▪ We have no choice to do nothing

▪ Identify the BEST VALUE outcome for the County capitalizing on opportunities for improvement.

▪ Serve citizens more effectively where they live and work

▪ Create modern hybrid work environment to function more effectively

▪ Address outstanding capital and maintenance budgets

▪ Opportunities to consolidate County real estate portfolio and drive economic development

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

BACKGROUND learned status next steps
This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.
5 background LEARNED status next steps
What have we learned

ENGAGEMENT: Staff

Mini-Focus Groups

▪ Representative staff participants across various department levels to set initial baseline understanding

Employee Survey

▪ 480 staff respondents

Virtual Workshops

▪ 126 total participants (including 2 external partners)

▪ L.K. Roos Building

▪ South County Government Center

▪ Crossings at Northwest

IMPROVEMENTS TO WORKSPACE FOR INCREASED PRODUCTIVITY All

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

background LEARNED status next steps BENEFITS TO HYBRID WORK
Staff Office Only Hybrid

ENGAGEMENT: Public

In-Person Surveys

▪ 88 total respondents

▪ L.K. Roos Building

▪ South County Government Center

▪ Crossings at Northwest Electronic Survey

▪ 433 total respondents

▪ Geographically and Ethnically diverse to match County demographics

Top priorities to improve customer experience

Residents support satellite concept

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

background LEARNED status next steps

DISCOVERYPHASE

Departmental Interviews:

▪ >20 departmental meetings, including Police

▪ Homework assignments completed by departments to understand their office needs

Departmental prototype layouts

Results:

▪ Ideal space and functional program

▪ Drives space type, size, and relationships

▪ $45 million in deferred maintenance

o LKR (’70) Backlog/Deferred Maintenance: $27m

o PHQ (’50) Backlog/Deferred Maintenance: $15m

o TPW (’80) Backlog/Deferred Maintenance: $2.4m

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

background LEARNED status next steps
This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs. Project Recommendations 9 Background learned STATUS next steps
This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs. 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 LKR DEADLINE IDENTIFY BUILD OCCUPY Funding Identified (Ideal) Funding Identified (Late) Scope & Delivery Method Chosen PROCURE (Varies by Delivery Method) Design (Varies by Delivery Method)
1st of 4 key tasks
address County
IDENTIFY TODAY Background learned STATUS next steps
to
Master Plan and LKR sprinkler mandate TASK1:

TASK1: IDENTIFY

IDENTIFY recommendations.

▪ WHY: LKR must be fully sprinklered by 1/1/2028

▪ WHAT: Project requirements and scoping

▪ WHO: Services/departments that are affected

▪ WHERE: Project(s) will be constructed

▪ WHEN: Procurement/construction schedule to meet mandate

▪ HOW: Funding required and best delivery method

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Background learned STATUS next steps

SCORINGMETHODOLOGY

PROJECT CORNERSTONE

▪ Utilized a scoring criteria familiar to the County to determine BEST VALUE

STAGE 1 - TECHNICAL:

How does each strategy score on technical merit to meet project goals and objectives.

100 points

STAGE 2 - FINANCIAL:

How does each strategy score on cost over a 20-year period for both capital and operations/maintenance.

100 points

Lowest 20yr cost gets 100 points.

Formula: low $$$ divided by strategy $$$ x 100

STAGE 3 – BEST VALUE:

Add Stage 1 and 2 scores to determine which strategy provides best overall solution that balances quality and price.

200 points

Add technical to financial to determine strategy providing highest overall value

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Background learned STATUS next steps

TECHNICALGOALS

▪ Set goals to maximize outcomes due to sprinkler mandate

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Background learned STATUS next steps Project Goals Points Minimum Score Required Improved customer service at locations they live/work 25 12.5 Modern, right sized, flexible work space 25 12.5 Well-maintained facilities and life-cycle optimization 20 8.0 Flexible and future-proof facility 10 3.0 Facility design maximizing civic pride and government perception 10 3.0
Underutilized
to defray
and
amenities
Leverage
assets
public cost
provide additional
5 1.3 Accessible by various transportation modes with sufficient parking 5 1.3 Total 100

STATUS next steps

TECHNICALSCORING

TECHNICAL SCORING

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

No benefit to customer service or switch to hybrid work

Modest improvements on project goals; Risk associated with renovating an old facility

Scores well, but doesn’t embrace right-sized model by maintaining both an Admin and PHQ facility

Achieves goals of improving customer service, adapting to hybrid work, and overall facility maintenance strategy

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

STRATEGY EXISTING NEW LKR CONSOLIDATED LKR/PHQ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LKR: FIRE SUPPRESSION ONLY LKR Interior Renovation LKR Interior + Exterior Renovation LKR Int + Ext w/ PHQ and MC Sat New LKR Replacement (PHQ Reno) Clayton Admin + MidCounty Sat (PHQ Reno) Clayton Consolidated + MidCounty Sat New Single Clayton Facility SCORING - PROJECT GOALS Min. Score Req'd for Consideration Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE TOTAL (out of 100) 12.50 41.5 9.00 24.33 14.33 41.67 19.33 55.33 23.00 65.67 25.67 76.33 28.67 86.33 34.00 99.00 28.67 80.67 TECHNICAL Score Rank 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 3
Background learned

steps

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

▪ Creates a new facility for Administration and Police core functions

▪ County Executive

▪ County Council

▪ County Counselor

▪ Police Headquarters

▪ Relocates crime lab to a new facility

▪ Miscellaneous support services

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

LKR–07: Clayton
1
LKR-07 stacking diagram
Background learned STATUS next

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR–07: Mid-County

Creates a new Mid-County satellite:

▪ One-Stop-Shop centralizes key functions and departments

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

▪ Improved public access and parking

▪ Enhanced public ability to interact with staff; secure lobby, kiosks, scheduling

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

▪ Reduces real estate in Clayton (most expensive metro region real estate)

Mid-County Satellite diagram

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

1
Background learned STATUS next steps

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

LKR

▪ Public Survey

▪ 78% Support consolidated facility

▪ Virtual Workshop

(staff/stakeholders)

▪ 63% Agree with strategy

▪ 35% Prefer C

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

▪ 25% Prefer A

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

–07: Mid-County
D C B 1
Survey Results: I-64 170 Hanley Olive A
Background learned STATUS
next steps

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

LKR–07OPTION

BENEFITS

▪ Highest rated technical score

▪ Serve the customer where they live and work

▪ Formal Business = Clayton

▪ Routine Business = Mid-County

▪ Reduces real estate portfolio by up to 2 facilities and eliminating their capital and operating costs

▪ Eliminates significant renovation risk

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

▪ Requires no temporary staff relocation or service interruption

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Mid-County Satellite diagram
1
LKR-07 stacking diagram
Background learned STATUS next
steps

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

LKR–06: Clayton

▪ Creates new core-function administration facility meeting needs of Project Cornerstone

▪ County Executive ▪ County Council

▪ County Counselor

▪ Miscellaneous support services

▪ Renovates Police Headquarters

▪ Relocates crime lab to a new facility.

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

▪ Creates centralized Mid-County satellite

Mid-County Satellite diagram

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

LKR-06 stacking diagram
2
Background learned STATUS next steps

steps

LKR–06OPTION

BENEFITS

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

▪ 2nd highest overall rated technical score

▪ Serve the customer where they live and work

▪ Formal Business = Clayton

▪ Routine Business = Mid-County

▪ Reduces real estate portfolio by 1 facility and eliminating their outstanding capital and operating needs

CONSTRAINTS

▪ Existing LKR site has limited stand-alone development potential

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

▪ Renovating PHQ may require temporary police relocation and multiple phases of construction

▪ More gross square feet available than necessary between new facility and PHQ

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Mid-County Satellite diagram
2
LKR-06 stacking diagram
Background learned STATUS
next

steps

LKR–04: OPTION

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

▪ Renovates LKR, with small building addition, into new administration and Police core function facility needs of Project Cornerstone

▪ County Executive

▪ County Council

▪ County Counselor

▪ Police Headquarters

▪ Relocates crime lab to a new facility

▪ Miscellaneous support services

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

▪ Creates centralized Mid-County satellite

L.K.Roos department diagram

Mid-County Satellite diagram

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

3
Background learned STATUS next

next steps

LKR–04: OPTION

BENEFITS

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

▪ Highest rated strategy utilizing existing L.K. Roos facility, 5th overall score

▪ Formal Business = Clayton

▪ Routine Business = Mid-County

▪ Reduces real estate portfolio by 2 facilities

CONSTRAINTS

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

▪ May require temporary facilities to house staff during construction

▪ Pending schedule of MC satellite completion

▪ Significant structural analysis and upgrades to meet seismic codes

▪ Increased risk of unforeseen existing conditions in renovating 50yr old structure

▪ Minimal improvement for public access to L.K. Roos

L.K.Roos department diagram

Mid-County Satellite diagram

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

3
Background learned STATUS

next steps

LKR–01: FireSprinklers

▪ Lowest overall technical score.

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

▪ Responds to the Code Mandate by providing fire sprinklers throughout LKR Building.

▪ New fire sprinkler system (safety)

▪ New ceilings and light fixtures (efficiency)

▪ Above ceiling abatement (safety)

▪ Central Plant equipment replacement (deficiency)

▪ Does NOT address any interior reconfiguration or exterior renovation to remedy existing work environment and building deficiencies.

L.K. Roos building - existing

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

4
Background learned STATUS

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

LKR–01: FireSprinklers

BENEFITS

▪ Meets City of Clayton Fire Sprinkler mandate CONSTRAINTS

▪ Does NOT meet overall project objectives

▪ Improved customer service

▪ Flexible workspace to accommodate hybrid work model.

▪ Eventually requires future interior and exterior renovation to keep facility operational ($118m+)

▪ Additional abatement required during future renovation

▪ $40m+ deferred maintenance NOT addressed

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

▪ Highest risk for uncovering unforeseen conditions and potential cost increases

▪ Will likely require temporary facilities to house staff during construction

L.K. Roos Building - existing

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

4
Background learned STATUS next
steps

PROJECTDELIVERYSTRATEGIES:

DBB:Design-Bid-Build

CMGC/CMAR:Construction Manager/GeneralContractor

(P)DB:ProgressiveDesignBuild

DBF:Design-Build-Finance

DBOM:Design-BuildOperate-Maintain

DBFOM:Design-BuildFinance-Operate-Maintain

Lease:LeasingOption

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Background learned STATUS next steps
PRIVATE FINANCE PUBLIC FINANCE SEGMENTED PROCUREMENT PACKAGE Increased Public Responsibility INTEGRATED PROCUREMENT PACKAGE Increased Private Responsibility (P)DB CMGC/ CMAR P3 Non-P3
Lease DBF DBFOM DBB DBOM
Key

PROJECTDELIVERYSTRATEGIES:

Delivery Option Benefits Challenges When to Use

Design- Bid-Build (DBB): Separate sequential contracts for design and construction. Low-bid selection. Owner manages most risk.

Example: ECC, County road paving projects

- Max owner control

- Familiar model

- O&M not included

- Budget and schedule risks

- Limited innovation/risk transfer

- Potential constructability issues

Simple, low-risk projects where design control is important

Construction Manager At-Risk (CMAR): Owner procures designer and then procures contractor before design is complete to allow constructability workshops. Price negotiated once design is complete.

Example: Parkway School District

Design-Build (DB): Single procurement for integrated design-build team. Best value selection.

Example: County Courts Building, Health Campus, Creve Coeur Soccer Park

- Greater designer/contractor coordination

- Moderate owner control

- O&M not included

- Less price competition

Mid-size to large projects with significant risks

Design-Build-Operate-Finance-Operate-Maintain (DBFOM or P3): Single procurement for integrated team that delivers all phases of project; Performance-based payments to incentivize investor oversight; Best value selection.

Example: KCI Airport, Long Beach (CA) Civic Center

- Greater designer/contractor coordination

- Price competition

- Moderate innovation/ risk transfer

- O&M included

- Pay-for-performance

- Max designer/contractor coordination

- Max innovation/risk transfer

- O&M not included

- Procurement may require more design

Mid-size to large projects where risks can be addressed before procurement

- Higher financing cost

- Complex procurement/contract

Large projects with significant risk and opportunity for innovation where O&M is critical

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Background learned STATUS next steps
This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs. Poor Acceptable Moderate Good Excellent
PSC P3 Background learned STATUS next steps DEFINITIONS P3: Public Private Partnership. Alternative delivery procurement utilizing private financing with O&M delivered by same integrated team that designs and builds project under a performance based contract. PSC: Public Sector Comparator. Project procured under more traditional methods and publicly financed # Delivery Goal DBB CMAR DB DBFM 1 Customer service 2 Modern, collaborative work environment 3 Facility maintenance 4 Flexible space 5 Future-proofing for technology 6 Best value and cost certainty 7 Leverage underutilized assets 8 Design creates civic pride 9 Transit + parking accessibility 10 Economic/transit-oriented development 11 Sustainability and resiliency 12 Employee amenities 13 Schedule Certainty 14 Park, recreational, and green space 15 Private sector investment 16 Minimize community impacts 17 Innovation 18 Risk transfer efficiencies 19 Swing space during construction
PROJECTDELIVERYSTRATEGIES:

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

REALESTATE

Development Pipeline:

▪ One factor to identify potential market value of County property

▪ What is highest and best use?

▪ Speculative office will not be supported in Clayton in near term

▪ >500,000sf delivered in next 2 years

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

▪ Multi-family expected to have consistent demand and diversify downtown Clayton

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Background learned STATUS next steps

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

REALESTATE:

Clayton Property

A. 41 S. Central (LKR)

B. 7900 Forsyth (PHQ)

C. 111 S. Meramec

D. 121 S. Meramec

E. Lot A West

F. Lot A East

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

Creve Coeur

▪ 1050 N. Lindbergh (TPW)

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Background learned STATUS next
steps

steps

REALESTATE

Market Outreach – Potential Satellite Locations

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

Leasing

• Market is favorable for tenants

• Large tenants have leverage – County may solve a vacancy challenge for an owner

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

• Renovated second generation space outside Clayton will be less costly (full service)

• Build to suit lease space will be more costly with most costly upfront costs

• County is within window to begin negotiations with landlords

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

Industrial Conversion

• May be an option, but will require deeper space search and cost analysis

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Background learned STATUS
next

SCORINGMETHODOLOGY

PROJECT CORNERSTONE

▪ Utilized a scoring criteria familiar to the County to determine BEST VALUE

STAGE 1 - TECHNICAL:

How does each strategy score on technical merit to meet project goals and objectives.

100 points

STAGE 2 - FINANCIAL:

How does each strategy score on cost over a 20-year period for both capital and operations/maintenance.

100 points

Lowest 20yr cost gets 100 points.

Formula: low $$$ divided by strategy $$$ x 100

STAGE 3 – BEST VALUE:

Add Stage 1 and 2 scores to determine which strategy provides best overall solution that balances quality and price.

200 points

Add technical to financial to determine strategy providing highest overall value

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Background learned STATUS next steps

LEGEND LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

Background learned STATUS next steps LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

WHAT: LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

Project Goals Points Minimum Score Required Improved customer service at locations they live/work 25 12.5 Modern, right sized, flexible work space 25 12.5 Well-maintained facilities and life-cycle optimization 20 8.0 Flexible and future-proof facility 10 3.0 Facility design maximizing civic pride and government perception 10 3.0 Leverage Underutilized assets to defray public cost and provide additional amenities 5 1.3 Accessible by various transportation modes with sufficient parking 5 1.3 Total 100

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

LKR CONSOLIDATED LKR/PHQ 1 4 6 7 LKR: FIRE SUPPRESSION ONLY LKR Int + Ext w/ PHQ and MC Sat Clayton Admin + MidCounty Sat (PHQ Reno) Clayton Consolidated + MidCounty Sat $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ assign 1-5 for each goal in raw score column SCORING - PROJECT GOALS Min. Score Req'd for Consideration Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE TOTAL (out of 100) 12.50 41.5 9.00 24.33 23.00 65.67 28.67 86.33 34.00 99.00 TECHNICAL Score Rank 8 5 2 1
STRATEGY EXISTING NEW
TECHNICAL SCORING LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

steps

WHAT: LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

FINANCIAL SCORING

ONLY

STRATEGY

EXISTING NEW LKR

assign 1-5 for each goal in raw score column

Total 20-year Cost (NPV): Inclusive of

▪ Construction costs to build the facility

▪ Capital Improvements during the 20yr period (if applicable)

▪ Debt Service costs

▪ Revenue

▪ Annual Operations and Maintenance costs

▪ Lease costs for Mid-County satellite (if applicable)

NOTE:

▪ Identified in 2023 $$$’s for reference purposes. Values are subject to fluctuation based on variables:

▪ Construction capacity and schedule

▪ Inflationary changes

▪ Interest Rates

▪ Market conditions

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

1 4 6 7
Clayton Admin
Reno) Clayton Consolidated + MidCounty Sat $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
SCORING - PROJECT GOALS Min. Score Req'd for Consideration Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE TOTAL (out of 100) 12.50 41.5 9.00 24.33 23.00 65.67 28.67 86.33 34.00 99.00 TECHNICAL Score Rank 8 5 2 1 scoring weights calculated by (lowest cost/proposed cost) x 100 points Anticipated 20yr life cycle cost (millions) $ 276.2 $ 437.3 $ 612.1 $ 560.2 SCORING - COSTS WEIGHTED SCORE WEIGHTED SCORE WEIGHTED SCORE WEIGHTED SCORE Lowest Capital Cost and Cost Certainty while ensuring quality and value 100.00 63.16 45.12 49.30 FINANCIAL Score Rank 1 2 4 3
CONSOLIDATED LKR/PHQ
LKR: FIRE SUPPRESSION
LKR Int + Ext w/ PHQ and MC Sat
+ MidCounty Sat (PHQ
Background learned STATUS next

WHAT:

BEST VALUE SCORING

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

STRATEGY

EXISTING NEW LKR

1-5 for each goal in raw score column

scoring weights calculated by (lowest cost/proposed cost) x 100 points

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

CONSOLIDATED LKR/PHQ 1 4 6 7
Int
and MC
Clayton Admin + MidCounty Sat (PHQ Reno) Clayton Consolidated + MidCounty Sat $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
SCORING - PROJECT GOALS Min. Score Req'd for Consideration Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE Raw Score WEIGHTED SCORE TOTAL (out of 100) 12.50 41.5 9.00 24.33 23.00 65.67 28.67 86.33 34.00 99.00
8 5 2 1
Anticipated 20yr life cycle cost in 2023 (millions) $ 276.2 $ 437.3 $ 612.1 $ 560.2 scoring
SCORING - COSTS WEIGHTED SCORE WEIGHTED SCORE WEIGHTED SCORE WEIGHTED SCORE Lowest Capital Cost and Cost Certainty while ensuring quality and value 100.00 63.16 45.12 49.30 FINANCIAL Score Rank 1 2 4 3 BEST VALUE SCORE - TOTAL 124.33 128.83 131.46 148.30 4 3 2 1
LKR: FIRE SUPPRESSION ONLY LKR
+ Ext w/ PHQ
Sat
assign
TECHNICAL Score Rank
weights calculated by (lowest cost/proposed cost) x 100 points
1
Background learned STATUS
next steps

LEGEND

LKR-07: New consolidated admin and PHQ facility and new MC satellite

LKR-06: New core admin facility, renovated PHQ, and new MC satellite

TASK1IDENTIFY: Conclusion

RECOMMENDATIONS

▪ PROJECT: LKR-07 identified as overall BEST VALUE consisting of:

▪ New consolidated Administration and Police core function facility

▪ New Mid-County satellite facility

▪ Delivery Method:

▪ To be determined pending legislative authorization ,additional market outreach, and financial model finalization.

LKR-04: Existing LKR houses core Admin and PHQ functions; new MC satellite

LKR-01: Sprinkler mandate

BENEFITS

▪ Provides the overall BEST VALUE to position the County for the future

▪ Provides improved customer service where the public lives and works

▪ Maximizes and consolidates real estate

▪ Integrates 20-year maintenance and operational costs to mitigate continued deferred maintenance needs

Mid-County Satellite diagram

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Background learned STATUS next steps
LKR-07 stacking diagram

Next steps

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.
36 Background learned status NEXT STEPS

MARKETOUTREACH: P3

1. Informal Engagement (May)

• Present public information (e.g., website, presentations)

• Gauge bidder interest

• Receive feedback on project scope, potential delivery methods, timing and key risks

• Focus on P3 industry, but can also engage local designers and contractors

2. RFI/Industry Day (June/July)

• More concrete direction on scope, timing, delivery method based on Council session

• Issue RFI at least 30 days before Industry Day

• Can require written responses and/or 1on1 meetings at industry day

• Industry day will include overview presentation, Q&A, 1on1 meetings with potential teams, and small business networking session

• Site tour optional

3. Procurement (Fall/Winter)

• Informed by industry feedback

• 1- or 2-step procurement

• Ideally starts after referendum approval, but could start RFQ before if confident of referendum outcome

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Background learned status NEXT STEPS

ORDINANCEAUTHORIZATION

▪ Adopt ordinance to allow for new delivery methods

▪ Construction Manager-At-Risk

▪ Public-Private-Partnership (P3)

▪ Both draft ordinances are in process

▪ Both strategies may provide benefit and opportunity for Cornerstone and other County projects

▪ Standard County contract requirements (M/WBE, prevailing wage, etc.) still apply

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

Background learned status NEXT STEPS

ACRONYMS

JCM: John C. Murphy Health Center (plan review only)

LKR: L.K. Roos Administration Building @ 41. S. Central

PHQ: Police Headquarters @ 7900 Forsyth

SA: South Assessor’s Office

SGC: South County Government Center

SHC: South Health Clinic (pending site location)

TPW: 1050 N. Lindbergh TPW Property

WGC: West County Government Center

SATELLITE CONSOLIDATION CONCEPT

▪ Continue validation of potential sites

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs.

WGC SGC SHC* SA TPW JCM* PHQ LKR
Southwest Satellite MidCounty Satellite LKR-07 Clayton Background learned status NEXT STEPS
document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record
copy and distribution
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 LKR DEADLINE BUILD OCCUPY Scope & Delivery Method Chosen IDENTIFY PROCURE (Varies by Delivery Method) Design (Varies by Delivery Method)
Wrap up the IDENTIFY stage
Move directly into PROCUREMENT phase
delivery
Identified
Background learned status NEXT STEPS
This
before
occurs. NEXTSTEPS
▪ Legislative approval on CMAR and P3
methods in June ▪ Delivery method and funding strategy recommendation in June we are here Funding
(Ideal) Funding Identified (Late)

Committeeof the Whole Questiontoday imaginetomorrow createforthefuture

This document or portion thereof may include records closed pursuant to Chapter 610 RSMo. Parties should verify with St. Louis County the status of the record before copy and distribution occurs. 30 MAY 2023
For updates, please visit St. Louis County’s Project Cornerstone page at:
DISCUSSION / Q&A

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.