ARCH 101: MIDTERM & FINAL GRADE ASSESSMENT of STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES (for both student and instructor use) X = instructor; 0 = student Student Name: Steven Peralta Semester: Fall 2012 Midterm/Final Grade:
Design Process Development (4: Mind and Hand are in charge of Ideas; Modes of Individual Process leads to Evolution of Refined Work vs. 0: No effort to think and do on one’s own, no individual design process is employed) 0
1
2
3
4
0
Architectural Concept Development (4: Consistently defined, explored, questioned and effectively developed with rare lapses into weak intentions vs. 0: vague or unreasoned with no definition, exploration, questioning, and development, intentions are weak or non-existent) 0
1
2
3
0
4
Successful Representation Skills (4: Writing, Drawing, Diagramming, Constructing, and Verbally Presenting are employed effectively to identify, analyze, explore, decide, and communicate vs. 0: tools of design are rarely used fully and in timely ways within an iterative design process) 0
1
2
3
0
4
Body of Work: Quantity Leads to Quality (4: Quantity of Work demonstrates a commitment to thoughtful effort accompanied by well-crafted work with rare lapses in to weak production vs. 0: Fails to show effort; work illustrates a lack of craft with a sustained absence of and/or weakness in production) 0
1 COMMENTS: Midterm: Instructor: Student: Steven Peralta Final:
2
3
4
0