http://www.strategyone.net/documents/Exec_Summary_Trust_2009_Midyear_Special_Report_FINAL

Page 1

70 60

71% 59%

58%

50

62% 60%

48%

40

36%

30

41%

39%

34%34%

30%

20

48% 46%

39%

44%

10 0

US

France

trust

Germany

India

China

Jan - 08

2009 Midyear Special Report

UK

Jun - 09

Jan - 09

Trust in business has stabilized and is recovering significantly in the United States and France, following a devastating loss in trust in the private sector; remains high in India and China. In January 2009, the Edelman Trust Barometer recorded the lowest trust levels in more than a decade of Edelman tracking (of informed publics ages 35-64). Given the ongoing recession, the spate of bank bailouts, nationalizations, and bankruptcies, as well as scrutiny of executive compensation, we conducted a special midyear update in six countries. We found that trust in business is on the way back in the West (with challenges) and remains quite high in Asia. The 12-point increase in U.S. trust in business (figure 1) includes the younger sample of 25- to 34-year-olds1, whose overall trust in business also rebounded after a sharp decline in January 2009. In the United States alone, trust in business among the younger age group was up by 26 points in six months; their trust in government was up 24 points. Trust in business and trust in government are now moving synchronously (figure 2), unlike previous years where they tended to move in opposing directions. The expectation today is for these two institutions to work collaboratively to tackle economic and societal challenges. Yet fifty-five percent (55%) say business hasn’t done enough to cooperate with government to solve the global economic crisis.

Figure 1: Trust in business on upswing How much do you trust business to do what is right? 100

100

90 100

90

+12

80 90 70 80 60 70 50 60

+13

30 40

48%

35%

30%

44%

40% 38%

41% 38% 30% 40% 34% 39%

75%

71%

78% 74% 72% 62% 60% 58%

55% 34% 34% 36%

39% 44%

44%

70 60 50 40

43%

30

42%

20

26%

10 20

10

100

0

U.S. US

0

U.K. UK

France France

Informed publics ages 25 to 64; Responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9=highest

Germany Germany

January 2008

India India

China China

Jan - 09

Jun - 09

January 2009

Jan - 08

June 2009

Figure 2: Trust in government rises How much do you trust government to do what is right? 100 90

+13

80

+12

70

74%

72%

78%

60 50 40 30 20

55% 43%

42% 30%

35%

40% 38%

38%

34%

44%

40%

36%

44%

42%

26%

10 0

U.S. 1First surveyed in the 2008 Barometer

48% 46%

43% 36% 42%

20 30

75%

+12

59%

40 50

80

+11

U.K.

France

Informed publics ages 25 to 64; Responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9=highest

Germany January 2008

India January 2009

China June 2009

1


Accepted a bailout or loan from the government to stay in business

45%

Filed for bankruptcy protection

+12

+11

Reduced pay of ordinary workers

71%

75%

70

58%

19%

60

62% 60%

Figure 3: “Cleaning house” likely reason for increased trust in 48% business 48% 46%

0

20

40

60

44% 80

41% 39% Would you 36% trust a company more or less39% if that company took this action?

Companies that have repaid bailout or loan money to the government, reduced CEO and executive pay, or fired non-performing management teams are more trusted by eight out of 10 informed publics (figure 3). However business still has work to do: Only 6% in six countries describe the reputation of large global businesses as “excellent” and 52% say companies haven’t managed business operations well enough to ensure they survive the global economic crisis.

34%34%

30%

81%

Reduced CEO and executive pay

80%

Jan - 08

Jan - 09 62%

78% Jun - 09

61%

Continued to spend money on philanthropy

58%

Accepted a loan 45% from the government Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest Filed for bankruptcy protection 31% Reduced pay of ordinary workers Distributed bonuses to executives after accepting a loan

22%

Figure 4: Technology most19% trusted industry in five of the six countries

How much do you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right? 100

Technology #3 in France (66%)

90 80

80%

70

81% 72%

60

In response to a separate question about what actions build trust, eightynine percent (89%) of informed publics said they would trust companies that 100 drive better innovation by investing 90 in research and development.

72% 69%

71%

50

93%

62%

86%

88%

84%

56%

40 30 20

+13

10

+12

0

74% U.K. 72%

U.S.

78%

France

Germany

India

China

60

Technology

50 40 30 20

43%

42% 35%

30%

40% 38%

38%

34%

55%

Food

Healthcare

Biotech/life sciences

Retail

Banks

44% publics 44% ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest Informed 42%

40%

36%

26%

10

Trust in institutions in six countries: Summer 2009 0 100 90 80

60 50

51% 48% 42%

40

37%

67% 52%

51% 44% 38%

78%

75%

70%

70

41% 40%

46% 35%

39%

44%

55% 53%

60%

How much do you trust the following institutions to do what is right?

50%

39%

28%

30 20 10

Informed publics ages 25 to 64; Responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest

0

U.S.

U.K.

France

Germany NGOs

2

2009 MIDYEAR SPECIAL REPORT ON TRUST

India Business

China Government

40

100

20

Reduced marketing budgets

Technology has historically ranked high in the Edelman Trust Barometer and continues to be highly trusted. The No. 2 position varies by market with five different sectors taking the spot (figure 4).

50

30

Repaid loan money to the government

Fired non-performing management teams Closed non-profitable business units

Tech maintains lead

70

80

75%

22%

Distributed bonuses 59%to executives after accepting a bailout or loan

Actions pay off

80

90

31%

Media

10 0

US


39%

50

34%

40

75%

58%

30

48%

20 10

Figure 5: A stakeholder, not a shareholder, world 0

Customers Investors Local Government How important do youEmployees believe the interests of theSociety following stakeholders should be to a CEO’s decisions? Treat employees well

100

Keep producing quality products and services

90

Have transparent and honest business practices

80

Communicate frequently and honestly on the state of their..

70 60

Create and keep jobs in your country

70%

Drive better innovation by investing in research and development

58%

50

49%

40

Make meaningful progress on their company's enviornmental..

45%

Partner with thired parties to solve 40%major global problems such as

30 20

Increase profitability and business performance

10

Commit tiem, money and resources to the greater public good

Investor interests need to be balanced with customer and employee interests when a CEO makes a business decision.

26%

Reduce the gap between CEO pay and the pay of average workers

0

Customers

Employees

Investors Pay seniorSociety Local Communities Government executives mostly in stock so that their compensation.. Communicate important messages through multiple media..

Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 8-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest Eliminate financial incentives for taking short-term risks

Discount product or service pricing Have the CEO appear in media to give updates on the company's Increase shareholder value Protect profit margins by increasing poroduct prices

43%

A stakeholder society

Figure 6: “Hard and soft” measures0rebuild trust

The expectation of the role of business has expanded, supplanting Milton Friedman’s famous 1970’s assertion that the social responsibility of business is to increase profits. In addition to investors ranking third in the list of stakeholders whose interests CEOs should heed (figure 5), profitability and performance falls behind employee well-being, transparent and honest business practices, and frequent communication in the list of factors that could build trust in a company (figure 6).

Would you trust a company more for taking the following action?

Data also show that business wins when it takes on big societal challenges and engages in private sector diplomacy. Informed publics place great importance on business’s commitment to finding solutions for global issues like global warming, energy costs, and access to affordable healthcare but say business has not done enough to create solutions for these causes (71%, 70%, and 64%, respectively).

20

40 94%

Treat employees well Keep producing quality products and services

93%

Have transparent and honest business practices

93% 91%

Communicate frequently and honestly Create and keep jobs

90%

Drive better innovation

89%

Make progress on environmental initiatives

82%

Partner with third parties to solve major global problems

82% 82%

Increase profitability and performance

81%

Commit resources to the public good

78%

Reduce the gap between CEO and average workers pay

75%

Pay senior executives mostly in stock

70%

Communicate messages through multiple media channels Eliminate financial incentives for taking risks

70%

Discount pricing

69%

CEO appearances

69% 66%

Increase shareholder value Protect profit margins

43%

Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest

3


0

India

China

US Excellent

Germany

France

Neither good nor bad

Good

UK Poor

Fair

Figure 7: East-West divide on multinational corporations How would you describe the reputation of large global business? 100 90 80

5% 25%

12%

23%

5% 24%

37%

20

34%

59%

U.K.

Informed publics ages 25-64

France Excellent

12%

17%

34%

10% 1%

17%

10% Germany

India

China

0

U.S.

59%

The way forward for business

22%

29%

24%

10%

24% 28%

30

10

12%

19%

18%

50 40

2%

24%

70 60

1%

Good

Neither good nor bad

1%

Fair

Poor

Optimism thrives in the East India and China are the most positive about business. At 75%, India recorded the highest level of trust in business of any of the six countries surveyed. China followed with 60% saying they trust business to do what is right (figure 1, page 1). In China and India, 96% and 81% of informed publics, respectively, say their country is headed in the right direction,

compared with 47% of Americans and Germans, 37% of British, and 31% of French. In another marked contrast to the West, nearly seven out of 10 informed publics in India and China rate the reputation of large multinational corporations as good or excellent, compared with 30% of Americans, 29% of Germans, 24% of French, and 13% of British (figure 7).

Companies in the West have a long way to go to regain the reputation lost in scandals, bankruptcies, and government bailouts; it won’t happen in a single year or through a single set of actions like those we’ve seen in the past six months, however successful they’ve been. Much like a dieter who’s rather easily shed the first 10 pounds but is struggling with the next 10, business has to negotiate tough issues like the gradual exit of government from the private sector and a new set of co-habitation arrangements. Business is expected to play a broader role in society, to collaborate more with government and NGOs, to consider employees before shareholders, and to communicate frequently and transparently. How to square these goals—characterized by mutual social responsibility and shared purpose— with a profit-making strategy? Only by resolving this question will companies attract the best employees, build support for brands, and achieve outstanding returns for investors.

About the Midyear Edelman Trust Barometer

About Edelman

The 2009 Midyear Edelman Trust Barometer is an abridged version of the firm’s annual trust and credibility survey. The survey was conducted by research firm StrategyOne and consisted of 15-minute telephone interviews using the fielding services of World One from May 26 to July 3, 2009. The survey sampled 1,675 informed publics in two age groups (25-34 and 35-64) in six countries: the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, India, and China. All informed publics met the following criteria: college-educated; household income in the top quartile for their age in their country; read or watch business/news media at least several times a week; and follow public policy issues in the news at least several times a week.

Edelman is the world’s leading independent public relations firm, with 3,200 employees in 51 offices worldwide. Edelman was named PRWeek’s “2009 Agency of the Year,” PRWeek’s “Large Agency of the Year” (for the third time in the last four years), and Holmes Report’s “2009 Best Large Agency to Work For” and was listed as a top-10 firm by Advertising Age in 2007 and 2008. Edelman owns specialty firms Blue (advertising), StrategyOne (research), and BioScience Communications (medical education and publishing). Visit http://www.edelman.com for more information.

Follow the midyear Trust conversation at twitter.com/Edelman_Trust and through #edeltrust. 4

2009 MIDYEAR SPECIAL REPORT ON TRUST


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.