Streetvibes July 27, 2011 Edition

Page 1

Cincinnati Activists ST R EE T V IB E S Expose ALEC

Feed Me Seymour: Fruit Salad

J u l y 2 2 - A u g u s t 4 , 2 0 11

Artist as Activist: Lauri Altman

PG 4 PG 8 J U LY 2 2 N D - A U G U S T 4 T H 2 0 11

1

PG 16

ISSUE 204

ADVOCATING JUSTICE • BUILDING COMMUNITY

House Bill 159: Obstructing Your Right to Vote

Breaking News:

On July 13th a compromise bill was brought forward, House Bill 224. This bill does not include the requirement to present a photo- ID to vote or the requirement to give one’s full social security number to register to vote. This new bill does however remove the option to register online to vote. This means that for now House Bill 159 is not actively being considered for passage. However, as has happened in the past, this bill or a version thereof may again be presented as soon as the fall of this year, requiring all of us to pay close attention and be ready to act. In this most recent struggle, action reaped results- for now. The following article explains what House Bill 159 or another bill like it would mean for citizens of Ohio, please read to be prepared.

Disenfranchisement, Ohio MARK GRAUHUIS & KYLE GALINDEZ Contributing Writers hio residents are facing yet another challenge to their civil rights. If House Bill 159 is enacted, Ohio will have one of the most restrictive voting laws in the country. If passed, the law will disenfranchise nearly 900,000 Ohioans, targeting students, seniors, people of color and low-income voters who have been hit hardest by the recession. This new bill follows hot on the heels of SB 148 and HB 194. Make no mistake, these are voter suppression bills that cripple in-person voting, prohibit Ohio’s 88 counties from mailing absentee ballots to all voters, or to

O

pay the return postage, and prohibit counties from providing voting hours on Sunday, Saturday afternoons, and the Monday before Election Day. The new bill also prohibits local board of elections officials from designing systems to meet the needs of their own communities, such as setting up more convenient voting sites. The new bills mandate prospective voters to show at the polls government-issued photo ID, cuts down on early voting (slashing the timeframe for early in-person voting from 35 days to 17), and make it more difficult for Ohio voters to cast their ballots. The purposes of such cynical bills are to dramatically scale back the window for early voting and eliminate county-level flexibility to craft innovative, pro-voter policies. Studies indicate that 25%

Increased voter regulations; does it protect us from voter fraud or “Them” from our votes? of African Americans nationwide do not have a government-issued photo ID, 18% of voters over age 65 do not have a photo ID, and 15% of voters with incomes under $35,000 lack the ID as well. Alternative forms of identification were devised by the legislature when it initially started to require photo identification at the polls to give people the ability to vote who do not have a drivers license and no other reason to have a State issued identification card. The Republicans refuse to discuss an amendment that would accept a college student ID with a photo from the student’s own state-funded uni-

versity. If the laws pass, over 600,000 students in Ohio would be prohibited from using their student IDs to vote. In addition, the “Miscellaneous” section of HB 194 sneaks in a measure that explicitly prohibits any public school from transporting students to a polling place during regular school hours for the purpose of casting a ballot. One of the worst sections of HB 194 eliminates a poll worker’s responsibility to direct you to your correct voting precinct. They are actually barred from answering questions or See House Bill 159, page 8

Kentucky Board of Elections Counters “No Address, No Voter Registration” Claims JESSE CALL Streetvibes Intern Writer

U

nder Kentucky law, eligible residents experiencing homelessness can register to vote based on the place where they regularly stay night-to-night, regardless of whether that place is a traditional dwelling or has an official address. For example, someone regularly sleeping outside a courthouse can register with the courthouse as his or her address. However, the issue that has brought confusion and debate is what happens when people experiencing homelessness fail to give any address on their voter registration form. Are Kentucky’s county clerks required to allow them to vote anyway, and if so, in what precinct? Chris Kellogg, communications director for Kentucky Secretary of State Elaine Walker, who chairs the Kentucky Board of Elections (BOE),

explained that when a voter registration card fails to list an address, it is considered incomplete and clerks are not required to register the voter. However, Kellogg said a BOE policy that has been in place for several years in the Commonwealth states

that if a county clerk knows a person is homeless and lives in the community, he should register the individual in the precinct where the county clerk’s

Homelessness and Healthcare PG 6

facebook.com/streetvibes cincinnati

office is located. This is the message intended to be articulated through the memorandum, she said. At least one local county clerk got a different message. Kenny Brown, the clerk for Boone County, said he read the memorandum as creating a loophole that could lead to rampant voter fraud. It also could allow voters to cast a vote for a position in a precinct in which they actually do not reside. “We don’t mind anyone homeless registering to vote as long as they fill out a card telling us wherever they are staying so we can put them in the proper place,” Brown explained. That way, voters are voting in the elections that actually influence them. In response to the BOE memorandum, Brown issued a press release and sent a memorandum to the State Board of Elections as to why he felt the directives were not consistent with state law and should be changed.

Let Me Be: An Interview with Chris Ellis PG 9

twitter.com/streetvibesnews

Brown cited Kentucky laws which require residents to provide both their mailing and physical addresses. Unlike the portion of the law which states a registrant must provide a Social Security Number, “if any,” there is no similar language alongside the address requirement. Another law states that if a registration is not “properly filled out,” it should be rejected. Brown says lacking a mailing and physical address means the form is not properly completed. He also cited two criminal statutes that people can be charged with felonies if they vote in a precinct other than the one in which they reside. Kellogg said Brown’s complaints are in regards to state laws and policies that have been in place for years and there was no new or changed requirements in the memorandum. See No Address, No Vote, page 4

Book Review: Understanding the Crash PG 12

streetvibes.wordpress.com


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.