November 2005
STREETVIBES Just Add Affordable Housing – For a Greater Cincinnati by John Lavelle On September 13th, voters in the city of Cincinnati voted overwhelmingly to nominate Cincinnati City Councilman David Pepper and State Senator Mark Mallory for the November 8th general election’s mayoral ballot. Each candidate is considered a moderate Democrat, so it will be up to each of them to distinguish themselves from each other. With both candidates receiving almost an equal number of votes, citizens expect a close race focused on the issues. Certainly, two issues on Steetvibes readers’ minds are the topics of homelessness and affordable housing. Let us take a brief look at the platforms and records of the two candidates: David Pepper When approached by the Affordable Housing Advocates earlier in the year about meeting to discuss the issues surrounding affordable housing, both candidates were eager to do so. AHA talked with David Pepper back in January, educating him on the purpose of AHA, the history of affordable housing in Cincinnati, and the current housing and wage crises. They expressed a desire to see stronger leadership and a David Pepper better relationship with citizens who all too often are unaware of their options and caught up in city bureaucracy. Pepper was receptive to the discussion and listened very openly. Certain parts of his platform reflect this, addressing the need for a living wage and more affordable housing. On his website, Pepper discusses his record on encouraging economic growth, stating that “key tasks remaining on this agenda include a comprehensive effort on affordable home ownership” (davidpepper.com/record.php).
He makes mention of “affordable housing” many times throughout his “Neighborhoods Plan,” particularly on page 27, where he acknowledges citizens’ problems with the Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority and demands greater accountability from their leadership so that residents can be better served. It should be noted as well that Pepper supports merging different subsidized housing programs in one entity (instead of both CMHA and the county, for example), a position not supported by many affordable housing advocates who feel this may limit choice for consumers of public housing. Under the “Economic Plan” on his website, Pepper states that the city must encourage employers to pay a living wage with benefits, reaching out to ex-offenders and highschool dropouts (page 32). Pepper has a history of active engagement with groups such as the Society for the Advancement of Reformed Felons (SARF) and has been very supportive in assisting this population into stability. Not all is peaches and cream with Pepper, though. In May 2003, he voted in favor of the panhandling ordinance, ardently supporting its subsequent renewal in 2004. The panhandling ordinance requires the registration of panhandlers who must then carry a license to panhandle, legislation that homeless advocates condemn as a violation of both the 1st Amendment and individual civil rights. Pepper talks affordable housing and living wage, but does not go much further in his comprehensive plans than quick mentions. Hopefully the coming month will shed more light on his stance on these important issues. Mark Mallory Mallory met with the Affordable Housing Advocates in early August, discussing his own thoughts and ideas. During the meeting, he expressed an interest in infill building and policy that mandates that a certain percentage of housing be affordable; this is a platform long shared by affordable housing advocates. He specifically noted Potterhill Homes – a company that makes high-quality, affordable modular
homes – as an example of a great option for affordable home ownership. He was also interested in more accessible housing for those in need of assisted living. Furthermore, Mallory agreed with AHA that resources be focused on the needs of renters and rental properties, recommending that emphasis be placed on treating citizens who rent as assets to the city. Finally, Mallory supported restoring the city planning department, the lack of which has frustrated advocates and developers since its dissolution. During that meeting and throughout his campaign, Mallory has stressed strong leadership and sustainable solutions to the city’s numerous problems. He appears to look beyond the surface of Cincinnati’s problems. Being able to look at the systemic problems is key to addressing a major issue such as homelessness. Mallory speaks for himself as having this capacity and the necessary leadership to boot. He cites his ten years of leadership in the state capital as evidence. In 2003, Senator Mallory worked with the Greater Cincinnati Coalition for the Homeless and the Coalition on Homelessness and Housing in Ohio to successfully restore $4.7 million in Emergency Shelter Grant funding and $5.5 million in Transitional Housing funding to the state budget. All that was necessary was a call to Mallory, who quickly understood how many people depended on this funding and was able to do the Mark Mallory necessary politicking to restore it within a week. Overall, it seems that each candidate would be able to have a profound effect on the city, given their qualifications and platforms. On November 8th, the citizens of Cincinnati will have the chance to decide who will lead the city for the next four years.
Ohioans Need a Raise! by John Lavelle Did you know that Ohio is one of two states – the other being Kansas – with a state minimum wage below the federal level of $5.15 per hour? That’s right, Ohio’s minimum wage still remains at the level at which it was set in 1990: $4.25/hour. Some 500,000 Ohioans work for this minimum wage, the majority of them women. Most are not even the stereotypical minimum wage workers: 15 year old high school students flipping burgers for gas money. It is estimated that around 71% of these minimum wage workers are over the age of 20. Currently, there is a campaign to put a referendum on the November 2006 ballot that
Email: homelesscivilrights@yahoo.com would raise the state minimum wage to $6.85/ or Phone: 513.421.7803 x13. hour, indexed to increase every year with inflation. Not only would this effect minimum wage workers, but experts expect the increase to raise pay for all low wage workers (the “rising tide lifts all boats” theory). In order for the referendum to appear on the ballot next year, proponents must collect 322,899 valid signatures from registered Ohio voters prior to August 10, 2006. Volunteers will be out at polls on Election Day, November 8th, Some 500,000 Ohioans work for minimum soliciting signatures and raising awareness. If wage, the majority of them women. you are interested in volunteering in the coming months, please contact John Lavelle, Civil Rights Advocate at GCCH, and will connect you with organizers.
Greater Cincinnati Coalition for the Homeless