Portland Works: Cold Spots Report
Studio Polpo 2014
Portland Works: Cold Spots Report March 2014
INTRODUCTION:
This report pulls together a number of diverse surveys, studies and investigations produced for Portland Works over the previous couple of years. It gives an overview of the information that already exists, comments on what has been learnt so far and identifies areas where there are gaps or unknowns. It also uses this existing information, together with new work and research, to suggest how Portland Works might develop to maintain its character as a lively, creative and innovative hub, based in a much-loved historic building in the heart of Sheffield. This report is a snapshot, bringing the mass of data collected so far into focus, rather than a guidebook explaining what to do next. We hope it will act as a prompt, and provide information and tools that will assist Portland Works in the planning of future works, funding bids and programmes, in a graphically accessible manner. To this end, a number of the documents presented in this report are ‘live’; that is to say they are spreadsheets or documents that can be added to or adapted to suit the changing circumstances or requirements of the Works. Each section includes discussion of key ideas and a description of the diagrams and drawings produced. Related visual information is cross referenced in this text using the arrow symbol (see below an example for the ‘Cold Spots Document Map’). In many cases a graphic explaining how the diagrams can be used is also included at the end of each section. The Cold Spots Document Map shows how each document produced for this report relates to previous studies and future decision making.
Cold Spots Document Map
Studio Polpo, 2013.
4.
CONTENTS:
Introduction
4.
Contents
5.
Cold Spots Document Map
1. Context
Information Produced So Far
6. 9. 11.
Room Data Sheet
14.
Heating Map
15.
Heritage
16.
Metal Trades Diagram
17.
Knife Making Process
24.
Room Significance
25.
Significant Elements
26.
Wild History Photographs
31.
2. Repair and Upgrade Measures
33.
Fabric Build-ups
36.
Fabric Build-up Costs
39.
Retrofit Opportunities
40.
How to Use: Retrofit Opportunities
42.
3. Analysis and Proposals
45.
47.
Data Visualisation
Vision Plan Graphics 1
48.
Vision Plan Graphics 2
50.
Vision Plan Graphics 3
52.
How to Use: Vision Plan Graphic 1
54.
How to Use: Vision Plan Graphic 2
55.
Mapping Occupancy
56.
Proposals
57.
Occupancy Mapping Retrofit Proposals
How to Use: Occupancy Mapping How to Use: Retrofit Proposals
58. 62. 64. 65.
Proposals Diagram 1
66.
Relocation Proposals
67.
Heating Proposals
68.
4. Future Uses
69.
74.
Future use Strategies
5. Funding and Research
77.
Funding Bid Diagram
80.
Funding Opportunities
80.
Research Opportunities
81.
6. Conclusions
83.
86.
Cross Referencing Drawings
Appendix
91. Schedule of Areas
93.
Funding and Costing Examples
94.
Fab-Lab Equipment Survey
95.
5.
Cold Spots Document Map
Portland Works Cold Spots Document Map
comission
QS
VP Graphic 1
Costs and priority of repair works
VP Graphic 2
Building Survey & Repair Schedule
Occupancy Mapping Showing which tenants use the works at which times (1)
Asbestos Survey
Conservation Management Plan
Heating Map
Energy & Sustainability Report
English Heritage Guidance
Current provision
Heating Proposals
Fabric Build-ups
Gazeteer: Room-by-room list of features
SSoA Masters Project 2011
Detailed build-ups of insulation approaches works with costs/m2 and U-values
Diagram Plans: Building elements and age of these
Diagram Live Project 2011
Statement of
FabLab strategies
?
Supporting information to accompany LBldg App
Live Project 2013 EXISTING SUREVEYS/INFO
WESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY
Room Data Sheets
Funding Opportunities Survey of relevant funding opportunities picking up on enterprise strand in particular (5)
Historical Research (ie A.de Lange)
Research Opportunities Survey of relevant opportunities (3)
QS
7.
Block A / Block D refurb
Budget Costs Amount of tenants engaged in metal-related trades (2)
Funding Applications Schedule of Areas
Metal Trades Mapping
Budget Costs
of all spaces with rates allowing costed fabric build-ups to generate cost
FabLab equip Survey Spatial requirements of equipment (4)
Opportunities
QS Proposals
Analysis showing relative ease of upgarding building fabric, space-by-space
space-by -space taking into account current/proposed tenancy and heritage issues
Proposals Diagram #1
Relocation Proposals
Space use strategy (6)
Phasing of Works
Suggested permant and temporary relocations to enable better use of spaces or refurb.
Heritage Partnership Agreement
Revenue & Funds
Works
Agreed document setting out methods for future works and negating further LBC applications
1. 2. 3.
Can assist in relocating tenants to more suitable areas of the Works or programming activities. Allows PWIPS to monitor metal trades as % of tenants and locate new metal-trades tenants. Research may bring funding directly applicable to capital costs (ie material testing) or raising
4. 5.
6.
Allows potential spaces for FabLab activities to be planned/allocated. Allows phasing and funding programmes to
Studio Polpo
funding requirements (ie public involvement, capital/feasibility costs). Initial space proposals for discussion based on other information gathered.
Existing Work by others
Wessex Archaeology Outputs Portland Works Guidance Quantity Surveyor cost check ?
Potential (unknown) link
1. CONTEXT
INFORMATION PRODUCED SO FAR:
Building Survey Report, Bond Bryan, March 2011
Asbestos Report
Energy and Sustainability Report
Bond Bryan were instructed by PW to carry out
A ‘Type 2’ asbestos survey was carried out by First
This survey and report were commissioned by PW
a high-level building fabric assessment in 2011
Order Red for PW in April 2011. This report found
from Nick Parsons of Sustainable Building, and
which summarised the building fabric, condition
that most asbestos-containing materials were
received in March 2013.
and remedial works required. Remedial works are
textile based, the majority of which were in “a
categorised into ‘Health & Safety’ (for immediate
manageable condition although removal may be
The report covers a number of aspects of the Works,
attention) ‘Year 2’, ‘Year 5’ and ‘Year 10’ giving an
the best management strategy for a number of
from material upgrades, to heating, lighting, energy
assessment of priority. Repair and remedial works
items “.
and water and makes recommendations based on
were also priced for budget purposes.
different levels of budget, difficulty and timescale. The report contains photographs and locations of
An inspection of the building and conversations
Bond Bryan point out that not all areas were
all items discovered. It has been assumed that none
with tenants and the building manager also inform
able to be fully accessed, and the drainage and
of these have been removed at this stage.
the approach and recommendations of the report.
mechanical and electrical services were not tested,
Areas containing asbestos have been cross-
only visually inspected.
referenced from the Asbestos Survey and flagged-
Key recommendations are the reduction of heat
up on the Room Upgrade Data Sheets that form
loss through the building fabric; initially by draught-
The document has been looked at by Richard
part of this report. An example sheet is included in
stripping and basic air-tightness measures, the
Fletcher Quantity Surveyors to comment on costs
this report.
prevention of water ingress and damp through
and rates. They were of the opinion that the
repair of rainwater goods, roofs and walls and
2011 prices are still current in July 2013, given the
then insulation (for which various strategies are
financial climate over this period, also that if these
Room Data Sheet
presented). A number of these recommendations
include contractor’s overheads and profit (as
have been adopted by Studio Polpo in the Repair
noted) they would be acceptable to use for current
and Upgrade Measures section of this report.
budgeting purposes. The report also looks at water use, heating, We have used this survey as a basis for outline
waste and power (and to what extent these are
funding strategies, most notably the JP Getty
shared or split into individual tenancies), and it
funding. This survey report is also summarised
is our recommendation that, as future works are
graphically elsewhere in this report (as Vision Plan
planned, the recommendations of the Energy and
Graphic 1) to give a clearer overview of issues by
Sustainability Report are used as initial guidance. An
floor and by block.
outline survey of tenants heating systems has been produced (Heating Map) as part of this report.
Heating Map A research project is also commencing with The University of Sheffield’s Engineering Department to measure the actual performance of the building fabric as well as the air permeability or ‘leakiness’ in order to better inform how to upgrade the building fabric.
11.
MA Sustainable Studies Project 2012
Live Project 2011
A group of students from the University of Sheffield’s
During the writing of this report, a second Live
A further group of students from the University of
School of Architectural Studies (SSoA) focused on
Project was carried out in 2013. This project
Sheffield’s School of Architectural Studies (SSoA)
Portland Works for a six-week period, and a report
focused on three key issues; improving the site’s
looked at building upgrades to Portland Works as
summarises their activities and findings.
currently unwelcoming entrance whilst maintaining
part of their Sustainable Studies Masters course.
security for tenants; introducing a ‘makers lab’ This project had a number of outputs: mapping
with equipment that can be utilised by tenants ,
The students focus on the workspaces of Mick
existing tenants and their processes; material
teaching workshops and other interested parties for
Shaw, Stuart Price and Nuala Price, and to varying
flows to and from the site; mapping the use of
work’s community profit and implementing way-
extents the Works as a whole. They analysed
the courtyard spaces; charting individuals and
finding strategies, that make it possible to find and
current thermal and lighting issues, and developed
organisations involved with the Works; a computer
advertise tenant’s work.
proposals to increase comfort levels and energy
and physical model that can form the basis of future discussions and proposals.
efficiency within the building. The project resulted in an event and an instruction manual providing a range of ideas that Portland
Although technical issues relating to the historic
These studies give an overview of both the
Works could implement, but would each require
building fabric and heritage/planning aspects
operation of the communal and some individual
more detailed input in terms of cost, technical and
relating to the character of the building are not
spaces, and these can usefully inform future
planning/heritage issues.
always examined in depth, these proposals include
proposals. The group also worked on engagement
a range of thought-provoking suggestions, in
strategies with both the public and tenants which
particular with regards to natural lighting.
can serve as useful precedents and tests. The Live Project data provides a valuable tool for those wishing to understand the operation of the Works. Crucially it should inform any strategies that address the communal spaces, and provide lessons in drawing tenants and visitors together through events.
12.
Drawings
Photographic Survey
Funding Bids
Scale drawings of the Works (in CAD format)
A detailed photographic condition survey with
A number of funding bids have been made and
exist of all floors and some elevations. The exact
images referenced to annotated plans was carried
details are held by PW. They include bids to JP
provenance of these is not known, and the
out in the autumn of 2012. This provides very useful
Getty, Garfield Weston Trust and the Architectural
accuracy can therefore not be guaranteed.
evidence of the condition and fit-out of all spaces,
Heritage Fund. These vary in complexity, however
However any check dimensions made so far have
particularly as a number of spaces are difficult to
all contain useful information that should be studied
revealed these to be fairly accurate.
access.
prior to making new bids.
It should be noted that, given the age and nature
This document should be updated as spaces are
See p94 of this report for JP Getty funding
of the building, there are variations and irregularities
altered. It will also be supplemented by works
information.
in the building that are, understandably, not picked
carried out as part of Wessex Archaeology’s
up on the drawings.
Conservation Management Plan.
More detailed elevational drawings produced by Tatlow Stancer Architects for the previous landlord, (as part of the rejected planning application to turn the Works into flats) exist online, on the planning portal. CAD or hard copies are not owned by PW however. We have used the plan and elevation drawings as the basis for areas in our Upgrade Measures, as these are accurate enough to be used for fairly high-level costings. It would be useful to prepare further measured elevational and sectional drawings as well as a roof plan prior to more detailed works being carried out.
13.
Room Data Sheet
14.
Portland Works Retrofit Room Data Sheet
Level: Ground
Block: A
Unit: 1A Tenant: Karl Whitham Rental:
Room Height 3.00
Room height
Fabric of Note (CMP)
Area (m2)
Cost/m2
Budget Cost
Current Construction
Retrofit Option
Walls
solid Brick
IWI.1
48
£86.11
£4,133.28
Ceilings
new suspended/fibreboard lathe & plaster below corrugated roof
CE.2
121
£45.35
£5,487.35
Floor
suspended timber
CE.2
121
£45.35
£5,487.35
area Windows 16no. timber sash 1.83 1.7 2.5 4.5
9 original windows
9 3 2 1
16.47 5.1 5 4.5
Doors
1
Heating Electric, wall mounted * Asbestos Ͳtextile flash pad to electrics
Rate / m2 based on proposed build ups
Notes from asbestos report
Area of architectural components
Elements of heritage significance flagged up here
A series of room data sheets have been set up as Excel worksheets. These pick up basic information on each room – floor areas, room heights, historic fabric noted as being of importance, and areas of asbestos picked out in the survey. These can be used to calculate costs of works, or record additions and changes.
Heating Map
15.
Portland Works Space Heating Diagram
32C
33C
31C
This diagram shows heating types installed (by tenants on the whole) in spaces. 34B-2
30D
Unheated
Gas Boiler /radiator
Electric Heater 34B-1
Air Heater 29D
Wood Stove
Second Floor
21C
22C
20C
23B
Meter
23B
28G
26E-3 25E 19D 26E-2
24A
18A
27A
25-A 26A-1
First Floor
8C-1
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
5C
17G-1
4C
17G-2
14B-1 3D-2 14B-2 14B-3
14F-4 3D-1
Meter 15G-1 2D-1 9B
15G-2
16G
15G-3 10B 2D-2 10A
12E WC
Meter
1A 11A
13A
Ground Floor 0D-1
0A-1
0A-2
Basement
HERITAGE
It is crucial for Portland Works, A Grade II listed
The Conservation Officer recognised however that
building with a key role in Sheffield’s history to be
there are a number of straightforward or urgent
maintained and developed in a manner that both
Wessex Archaeology
repairs of a ‘like-for-like’ nature that can be carried
protects elements of historic significance, and
out without the need to submit a Listed Building and
allows it to function as a lively place of work for
Planning Applications. An outline of the works and a Wessex Archaeology were subsequently appointed
sample of proposed materials (bricks for example)
by Portland Works to carry this out, their scope of
should be sent to the CO for approval prior to any
works being as follows:
of the works however.
metalworking are identified in the Metal Trades
Project Inception Meeting to collate all current
It was also recognised that the fabric of the building
Diagram
data. Wessex were given the draft version of
has undergone numerous changes and ad-hoc
the Cold Spots report as well as other relevant
alterations over its lifetime and this is part of the
documentation.
character of the works, however new work should
skilled and creative tenants. Metal trades are key to the history of Portland Works and spaces within the Works that are still used for
Metal Trades Diagram
Initial meetings were held between Studio Polpo, Zoe Mair, Conservation Officer at Sheffield City Council, and Kathryn Gibson of English Heritage to discuss the approach to any repairs or alterations at Portland Works.
be sympathetic to the nature of the building, Review of Existing Documentation. As consultants
and, in particularly not cause the original fabric
for the previous planning application Wessex
to deteriorate. This is particularly important when
Archaeology already had background information
installing insulation for example.
on Portland Works. There was also research carried out subsequently by group members Peter and Anna DeLange as well as the knowledge of longterm tenants such as Andy Cole that contributed to
Both Zoe and Kathryn were of the opinion that an understanding of what aspects of the Works were of value was crucial. Although it is primarily the arrangement of buildings around the courtyard, and layout of spaces that relate to their use in cutlery and tool manufacture, that is noted in the listing text, certain internal features are of value. English Heritage’s “Planning for the Historic Environment Practice Guide “PPS5, also outlines recommendations for Local Authorities when dealing with Heritage Assets. Policy HE6.1 in particular outlines the need to “understand the nature of the significance of the asset.. the extent of the fabric that holds this interest.. and the level of interest”.
this. Detailed Site Investigation. This was to comprise of a ‘gazetteer’, documenting the significance of fabric and elements room by room and including photographs and exact locations. Summary Report. This report was to pull together all the previous research and gazetteer information to provide a summary and interpretation of the history, development and significance of the site and its built fabric. Consultation Meetings. Wessex were to meet key stakeholders (tenants, steering groups etc) to discuss the findings of their report, key risks, opportunities and future issues.
Both a Conservation Management Plan and Statement of Significance will therefore play a vital role in informing the future of the Works, and to this end Studio Polpo approached three locally based heritage consultants with experience of Sheffield metal-trades buildings to quote for the preparation of the initial stages of a Conservation Management Plan.
16.
Final Report. All of the material would be collated into a report, which would provide an initial set of guidelines and evidence to inform future development.
Metal Trades Diagram
17.
Portland Works Metal Trades Diagram
32C
33C
31C
The Portland Works FLAG group (Finance, Legal and Governance) decided that when considering new tenants, preference should be given to metal trades. It has been agreed that metal trades should make up to 50% of the tenancy of the Works. (Whether this is defined by the number of businesses or by floor area is to be confirmed.) 34B-2
This diagram identifies the spaces currently used by metal trades at Portland Works to give an indication of the current proportion of these.
30D
Areas identified as ‘Potential Metal Trades’ on this diagram are simply those that at the time of writing are empty, and it should of course be borne in mind that the activities classed as ‘Existing Metal Trades’ and future metal trades tenants vary significantly from fairly heavy duty (forging for example) to small scale and delicate (such as jewellers). The nature of the activity will therefore determine the appropriate location and size of space. For example activities requiring large or heavy equipment or material deliveries would be best suited to the Ground Floor whereas lighterweight, more sedentary activities would be beter suited to upper floors.
34B-1
29D
Second Floor
21C
22C
NON-METAL TRADES
20C
EXISTING METAL TRADES
POTENTIAL METAL TRADES
23B
Meter
23B
28G
26E-3 25E 19D 26E-2
24A
18A
27A
25-A 26A-1
First Floor
8C-1
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
14B-1
5C
17G-1
17G-2
3D-2
14B-2 14B-3
4C
14F-4 3D-1
Meter 15G-1 2D-1 9B
15G-2
16G
15G-3 10B 2D-2 10A
12E WC
Meter
1A 11A
13A
Ground Floor 0D-1
0A-1
0A-2
Basement
Summary of Conservation Management Plan The two-volume report produced by Wessex
Key Characteristics of Portland Works (as listed by
4. Chimneys denoting the location of hearths in
Wessex Archaeology):
workshops and identifying the locations of hot working practices;
1. The wide range of authentic scales of the workshops, which demonstrates and makes legible
This may suggest prioritising the re-use/lining of
the range of activities once carried out here;
chimney flues to work with any new heating
Archaeology includes a detailed analysis of the
systems, as opposed to needed to install horizontal
history of the Works, a room-by-room analysis of
The legibility and hierarchy of spaces is, more
elements of particular historic interest, and also
than the historic fabric, of significant importance.
information on the comparative importance of
It has the potential to form a basis for future
5. The use of stable doors and unglazed window
rooms and spaces within the Works.
development, and, a means of conveying the
openings, also identifying the location of hot
history of the Works. This should not preclude the
working producing steam and/or fumes;
flues through existing walls.
Wessex Archaeology (WA hereafter) also list a series
sensible sub-division of historically larger spaces
of recommendations for the conservation and
where the new and old fabric are clearly legible
These area of Block B (also picked up in the listing)
future management of the Works as a conclusion
however, where new interventions are removable,
will, realistically, need to remain glazed in order
to their report (although it should be noted
and where this may have greater financial benefits
to function as something other than hand-forges,
that this is included with the proviso that these
for the Works in terms of rental.
however the door, window and shared lintel pattern
recommendations would normally be developed
is distinctive and easy to retain.
in more detail in a subsequent stage). WA point out
2. Circulation within the complex is largely external:
that a Maintenance and Management Plan will
work units being independently accessed from the
6. The differing wall, ceiling and floor finishes, and
be needed for complex Heritage Lottery Funded
exterior (whether at ground or upper floors) with few
fenestration of different blocks, and different spaces
projects and this information can be used to inform
original internal connecting doors;
within blocks which denote the relative status and
such a plan.
requirements of the original activities which took Certain parts of the Works (top floors of Blocks E & A)
place there, and that of their specific user groups;
The findings of WA have been referred to when
do not function adequately in terms of fire escape
established areas of retrofit, new uses and proposals
at present and the addition of external stairs will
A key strategy when assessing the potential to
in this report. We have also used diagrams (as
address this. It is positive that these would be part of
re-fit and insulate internal surfaces has been both
detailed on the following page) to further clarify
an existing language of external access stairs.
the likely use of the space and the nature of its
some of WA’s assessments of the building.
construction – see Retrofit Proposals diagrams on 3. The limited palette of materials and construction,
The WA report ends with a series of constraints
and the uniform and regular positioning of doors
and opportunities, along with recommendations
and windows within individual ranges;
pages 62 & 63.
and suggestions. We have summarised these below, along with a commentary on their specific
This presents no particular issues, it may well help
implications, or issues for debate.
with future repairs in that a more limited amount of materials (i.e. bricks), and approaches (to windows) can be agreed.
Retrofit Proposals
7. The remains of power transmission/line-shafting indicative of the locations of former powered processes. Care must be taken to retain these items, and informing tenants about what, and where they are, will aid this.
18.
Negative aspects of Portland Works (as listed by
of large and bulky materials) and enable tenants
storeys will help reduce heat loss and a degree of
Wessex Archaeology):
of these spaces to have the same benefits through
sound transmission. Removing floor boards in most
other means. In some areas (unit 12E) for example,
cases however, is costly and often very difficult to
This section of Wessex Archaeology’s report
the shutter is an addition to a relatively recent
do without causing damage to the floor boards,
(‘Detracting Features’) illustrates most clearly the
block and was always open when the former
and replacing original damaged ceilings (of which
clashes between a more conventional heritage/
tenants where working, generally all day during the
there are a number due to water ingress and
archaeological reading of Portland Works as a
week, providing useful natural surveillance and a
lack of maintenance over time) may be a better
historic building, with its more recent ‘wild’ history
rare glimpse of activity. Enhanced security at the
solution.
(see pages 30 & 31).
entrances, or better performing, smaller doors/ gates may also be an alternative.
It should also be noted that in many cases the fabric of the ceiling, although original, is not of
Wild History Photographs
3. uPVC replacement doors and windows;
intrinsic interest or value.
It would be suggested that these are replaced if Many interventions carried out in the last 50 years
works are carried out to the block or room in which
5. Blocking of air vents to the rear of Block B;
have been ad-hoc and carried out by individual
these are located, at change of tenancy, or if
tenants without consideration of historical (or in
substantial grant funding is received. At present
It is proposed that the filling of holes, and sealing of
some cases structural) issues, a number of other
however, these may be the best performing doors
gaps around doors and windows (in a traditional
traces illustrate the Works uses as venue for parties,
and windows on site despite being visually obtrusive
manner) will go some way to reducing heat loss
and a home to musicians, artists and smaller less
and detracting from the nature and patina of the
through gaps in the building fabric, and reducing
established makers.
Works as a whole.
drafts, which cause discomfort to occupants. The air vents in question can be re-opened but fitted
1. The corrugated sheet enclosure to the west of
4. Modern inserted suspended ceilings;
the cart passage entrance to the Works;
with simple manual shutters, operated internally, to allow them to function as vents again when
A number of spaces have been used as recording
required.
It would benefit the Works if this ad-hoc storage
spaces or music studios, which has led to the
enclosure was cleared, and the objects stored
construction of sound-proofed rooms-within-rooms,
6. Graffiti in the former high status stairwell (although
within it relocated by the tenant. This space could
and numerous layers of materials (such as foam
of some intrinsic interest) –long term consideration
provide a location for visitor information or way-
and carpet) on walls, floors and ceilings. Now that
of moving the graffiti memorial to a more
finding within the Works. It also encircles a light-well
tenants are moving out, or changing spaces, there
appropriate part of the building.
above which would give daylight and visual interest
is the opportunity to remove these elements.
to the passage.
It is proposed that the history of this piece be In a number of spaces, suspended ceilings have
looked into in more detail to establish what form an
2. Inserted metal roller shutters providing security to
been installed to hide damaged or deteriorating
equivalent memorial might take – this may or may
some units;
original ceilings - a quick and cheap solution. This, in
not be a new piece of graffiti.
some cases, has been beneficial, allowing original These could be removed at change of tenancy – it
ceilings and mouldings to be retained, and the
is important however to establish the reason for
removal of these modern ceilings is straightforward
these having been installed (security or the need to
should there be an opportunity to replace or repair
provide a large clear opening to enable deliveries
ceilings above. In many cases, the insulation of floors between
19.
Wessex met with members of the Portland Works steering group (as well as other groups) in December 2013, to discuss the draft report
Strategic Suggestions
(although it should be noted that many of those present had not seen the report produced by WA before or at the meeting). Discussions at this
Space use
Education
meeting focused around the need for the Works to
One principle to come out of the meeting was to
There is also a suggestion that education and
remain a working building with a consideration of its
align new tenancies and space uses with historic
mentoring opportunities be created through
history and heritage, rather than a historic building
ones as a way of making current and future uses of
building and refurbishment work, but also by
preserved at the expense of working tenants. We
the spaces explain their original uses. This idea is a
trades and tenants. Although a valuable aim, this
have listed strategic, and more fabric-oriented
practical one, as it would locate tenants with heavy
should not, we feel, be specifically linked to any
suggestions below.
and noisy equipment and processes in spaces with
conservation or heritage plan as it may prove too
stronger floors and heavy walls (i.e. Block C, Ground
restrictive. It could however become something
Floor) and tenants with lightweight equipment (i.e.
that is an aspiration or linked to the PW business
artists) at upper levels or nearer the front of the
plan and many funding bids (HLF in particular)
Works, such as in Block E. The Vision Plan Graphic 2
require details of education and learning benefits
(pages 50 & 52) shows the current locations of light/
created.
heavy users. Public Interface Previous issues at the Works with a lack of space for meetings (for steering groups, or with external
Vision Plan Graphic 2
parties) are currently addressed by allowing the use of G.Floor space 1A outside of the tenant’s working hours (and this is a room accessible from the street or courtyard). This may no longer happen
Rental value
if circumstances change however.
WA state that “ there is currently a high demand for units within the complex, but that this is likely
WA suggest a café space in the first Floor Block
to be more to do with the relatively low rents,
E area, however there is some scepticism of
than due to a sympathy with the ethos of the new
whether a café here would work, or indeed be
management. It will be necessary to calculate the
required at Portland Works, with the neighbouring
likely demand for units at higher rents once the
Harland Works operating a successful café for
units have been refurbished.”. The current issues
the John Street Triangle, and numerous food and
around the use of units for storage, or by absent
drink establishments on the nearby London Road.
tenants does reflect the very low rents, however,
Proposals to be able to display work produced
increasingly, new tenants are attracted by the
by tenants could, however be met by display/
ethos, location and spaces at the Works. It is clear
reception space at the end of Block A and plans
that rents will change to a degree, however it
to relocate the artists to Block E and open up
should be recognised that this will reflect spaces
previously blocked windows to allow views into
that are dry, warmer and connected to improved
the former exhibition space will provide a public
facilities and a new type of maker-tenant will form a
interface of sorts.
larger part of those looking to rent at the Works.
20.
Fabric Suggestions
The Works are looking at ways of providing a public
There are three key points made regarding the
in existence, and contained in the Wessex Report,
interface in a number of ways including digital ones
historic fabric at Portland Works in WA’s report.
appear to be montages (albeit old ones) and not
(allowing makers to showcase their work), and series
original images, and care should be taken when
of regular tours and open days which give a good
Wall finishes
using some of these as references for new works.
access to spaces and some of the tenants, but with
“Careful consideration will therefore need to
It is important that conjecture does not play a role
guides, information and facilities that would hinder
be given to the introduction of internal thermal
in removing recent interventions to be replaced
the day-to day operation of the Works otherwise.
lining of solid walls to ensure that this does not
with an idea of what once existed – again many
fundamentally change the character of the
interventions that have taken place in the second
It is also important to ensure that the public are
spaces, and destroy the legibility of the former
half of the 20th Century contribute to the story of
aware that the Works is a working busy building,
functional difference between spaces”. Timber
the Works, it’s idiosyncrasies and patina and to
and recent proposals by students at the University
tongue and grooved match-boarding to blocks
replace them with new ‘historic’ elements would be
of Sheffield’s School of Architecture looked at
A,C and D in particular is picked out as a lining
to erase some of the history of the Works.
methods in which lighting and signage might do
used to create clean spaces. Our retrofit proposal
this. An early intervention when the building was at
diagrams take these recommendations into
Windows
risk of development into flats highlighted the makers
account. The alignment of hot and ‘heavy’ uses
WA note that the Bond Bryan survey recommends
within the Works, and this projection of the activity
(i.e. welding and forging) with exposed masonry
the replacement of many windows. WA propose
and life within the Works to the street, continues to
walls at ground and light, often sedentary uses (i.e.
that repair and refurbishment, and secondary
be a key strategy.
artists) on the upper floors with internally insulated
glazing be investigated as a potential alternative. It
walls then links the strategic desire to use rooms in
is important however, that a study identifies which
The section at the end of the report looks at making
manner analogous to former uses, with a way to
windows are original, or where a range of window
and digital manufacturing as one potential way
maintain wall coverings where required.
types exists in a block, which should be used as a
of bringing the public, academia and tenants
guide for replacements. A definite approach to Value of fabric
new windows, window repair and upgrades is an
A key question has been the approach to historic
important document for the Works and may form
Security
fabric – do elements have to be replaced by
part of a HPA.
Natural surveillance that is a result of presence and
what was originally there for example? WA report
activity on the site is picked up as a good means
recommends that “Historic components will need
of security –the location of tenants that will use
to be repaired or replaced on a like-for-like basis,
the Works at complimentary times will help (and
in terms of both design and materials. Surviving
the diagrams on pages 58 onwards can assist
elements and fabric, and historic images will need
with mapping this), and the different uses of main
to be used to inform the removal of inappropriate
door through Block A to the courtyard, and main
or unsympathetic later interventions and to restore
passage gate (with wicket door) will also act to
known authentic features”.
together, and what the opportunities are for this.
control access. There are questions relating to this that discussions with English Heritage and the SCC Conservation
Occupancy Mapping
Officer will go some way to answering, as would a Heritage Partnership Agreement (HPA). It should be noted that a number of the historic photographs
21.
Heritage Significance Diagrams
The conservation management plan contains a lot of information about the historic activities within of Portland Works and remaining significant features. Some of this information has been represented graphically, so that Heritage considerations can be understood alongside architectural, tenant and environmental interests. The following drawings have been produced:
Knife Making Process
Room Significance
Significant Elements
The Knife Making Process drawing describes how stainless steel knives were produced and maps this process onto the spaces in the Works. The Room Significance Drawing uses the conservation management plans grading system to show the relative significance of whole spaces within the Works. The Significant Elements drawing uses the conservation management plan gazetteer to highlight the individual architectural elements and features that are of most heritage significance.
22.
Signs of active metal trades at Portland Works
23.
Knife Making Process
24.
Portland Works Knife Making Process
32C
33C
31C
Mapping the heritage knife making process at Portland Works
34B-2
30D
34B-1
29D
second floor
21C
22C
20C
7.
6. Taking-in door for first floor grinding
6.
23B
7. Access to workshops via a number of separate doorways to facilitate independant working. Upper floors often accesed via external staircases.
Meter
8. Showroom
23B 28G
9. Warehousing, Packing
26E-3 25E 19D 26E-2 24A
9.
8.
18A
27A 25-A
first floor
26A-1
1. Elaborate cart passage. Unusually there is no evidence of weigh machine
3. e 8C-1
E
8C-2
7C
e
6C
Meter
14B-1
5C
17G-1
17G-2
e
3. Grinding located near to engine house
3D-2
14B-2
14B-3
2. Yard used as secure place for loading and unloading goods
4C
4.
14F-4
4. Unusual for buildings to be constructed in yard of an integrated works
3D-1 Meter 15G-1 2D-1
5. Knife inspection and packing
9B 15G-2
16G
2.
15G-3 10B
2D-2 10A
E
engine house (steam)
e
gas engine
12E
WC
Meter
1A 11A
5.
13A
1.
ground floor
primary steel production at specialist manufacturer (outside pw)
showroom and offices delivery by cart
** primary production of steel
yard used for loading and nloading
forging
(power)
(hand)
grinding and glazing
hafting / cutting
buffing / polishing
inspection and packing
Room Significance
25.
Portland Works
32C
33C
31C
in the Wessex Archaeology Conservation Plan Volume 1, November 2013, page 20.
34B-2
30D
34B-1
29D
Second Floor
21C
22C
20C
Of high intrinsic heritage value and makes an essential contribution to the special historic character and heritage value of the property as a whole, and whose loss or inappropriate alteration should be avoided at all costs.
Moderate intrinsic interest, but makes a key contribution to the 23B
made to retain and enhance these elements.
Moderate to low intrinsic interest, but makes a positive contribution to the overall character and interest of the property, and may be an important element in the understanding of a key phase of the development of the property. Their retention is desirable, but an argument could be made for their removal to allow enhancement of the site as a whole.
Meter
23B 28G
26E-3 25E 19D 26E-2
Element not investigated
24A
18A
27A 25-A 26A-1
First Floor
8C-1
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
14B-1
5C
17G-1
17G-2
3D-2
14B-2
14B-3
4C
14F-4 3D-1
Meter 15G-1 2D-1 9B 15G-2
16G
15G-3 10B
2D-2 10A 12E
WC
Meter
1A 11A
13A
Ground Floor 0D-1
0A-1
0A-2
Basement
Significant Elements
26.
32C
33C
31C
34B-2
30D
34B-1
29D
Second Floor
21C
22C
20C
23B
Meter
23B 28G
26E-3 25E 19D 26E-2 24A
18A
27A 25-A 26A-1
First Floor
Significant Elements
27.
8C-1
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
14B-1
5C
17G-1
17G-2
3D-2
14B-2
14B-3
4C
14F-4 3D-1
Meter 15G-1 2D-1 9B 15G-2
16G
15G-3 10B
2D-2 10A 12E
WC
Meter
1A 11A
13A
Ground Floor
Portland Works Significant Elements In addition to overall room significance, architectural elements of high intristic heritage value have been flagged up using the following symbols: These should be cross referenced with the Wessex Archaeology room data gazetteer
Layout / circulation / access Ceiling
Wall
Floor
Door
Fixtures and fittings
Heating
Power 0D-1
Window
0A-1
Basement 0A-2
Heritage Partnership Agreement Kathryn Gibson of English Heritage suggested that
A heritage partnership agreement may contain
a “Heritage Partnership Agreement” (HPA) may be
provision granting listed building consent in respect
appropriate to Portland Works.
of specified works for the alteration or extension of
(a) must be in writing;
These are defined by EH as:
the listed building to which the agreement relates,
(b) must make provision for the parties to review its
and specify any conditions to which the consent is
terms at intervals specified in the agreement;
subject.
(c) must make provision for its termination and
“A non-statutory agreement which sets out an understanding of the significance of the heritage asset or assets and in particular what is not of
A heritage partnership agreement—
variation;
A heritage partnership agreement may also:
special interest in listed buildings. Once the
(d) may relate to more than one listed building or part, provided that in each case a relevant local
agreement is in place, it can reduce the number of
(a) specify or describe works that would or would
planning authority and an owner are parties to the
occasions when listed building consent is required
not, in the view of the parties to the agreement,
agreement; and
and thereby save the owner and local authority
affect the character of the listed building as a
(e) may contain incidental and consequential
time and money.
building of special architectural or historic interest.
provisions.
(b) make provision about the maintenance and Reaching an agreed and fuller understanding
preservation of the listed building;
The Secretary of State may by regulations make
of significance will reduce areas of doubt or
(c) make provision about the carrying out of
provision—
confusion, aid better management and increase
specified work, or the doing of any specified thing,
the prospect of success for a consent application
in relation to the listed building;
(a) about any consultation that must take place
where it is still required.”
(d) provide for public access to the listed building
before heritage partnership agreements are made
and the provision to the public of associated
or varied;
facilities, information or services;
(b) about the publicity that must be given to
(e) restrict access to, or use of, the listed building;
heritage partnership agreements before or after
“ A Listed Building Heritage Partnership Agreement
(f) prohibit the doing of any specified thing in
they are made or varied;
(HPA) will be a new statutory agreement which
relation to the listed building;
(c) specifying terms that must be included in
sets out an understanding of the significance of
(g) provide for a relevant public authority to make
heritage partnership agreements;
the heritage asset or assets and in particular what
payments of specified amounts and on specified
is not of special interest in listed buildings. Once the
terms—
English Heritage explain further that:
agreement is in place, it can reduce the number of occasions when listed building consent is required.
(Kathryn Gibson, English Heritage, October 2013)
(i) for, or towards, the costs of any works provided for under the agreement; or (ii) in consideration of any restriction, prohibition
The work produced by Wessex Archaeology will
There is no proscribed format for HPAs and each
or obligation accepted by any other party to the
be crucial in this agreement should Portland Works
will be tailored to the particular circumstances of
agreement.
decide to go down this route. Given the long-term
the buildings that it relates to. Key parts will be
nature of any building works programme, an HPA
an understanding of the historic development of
may reduce the costs and work involved in multiple
the building and an analysis of the elements that
Listed Building Consent applications substantially.
make up its significance, considered in terms of their evidential, historical, aesthetic and community values. This will then inform the Conservation Management Plan which should include details of anticipated works and how they are proposed to be carried out.”
28.
Assesment of Heritage Partnership Agreements The “Heritage Protection review: Assessment of
Findings were that documentation should not be
In terms of feedback on the process, those running
eight pilot projects for the Department of Culture,
elaborate and should include:
the site at Darnall felt that a clear and concise
Media and Sport” was commissioned in 2006 to
guide on maintenance and a straightforward
provide an independent assessment of eight
•
Timeframes and monitoring methods, as
Heritage Partnership Agreement projects, one of
well as parties to the agreement.
which was Darnall Works in Sheffield. All quotes and
specification for repairs (that could be understood and overseen by non-specialist building professionals) to achieve conservation objectives
information below are taken form this report.
•
Overall conservation philosophy
was important.
The report recognised that Local Authority capacity
•
Identification of works that will not require
It should be noted that Sheffield City Council felt
was a complicating factor in the initial setting-up of
consent, pre-agreed consent for certain
that the relationship between the HPA and the
these agreements (requiring fairly intense resourcing
other works (routine works otherwise requiring
planning system would need further clarification
initially) however they had the potential to reduce
repetitive consent) and a specification of
and also expressed concern over drawing up and
the workload and expense for the LA once in place.
standard works including methods and materials
policing new HPAs, despite being interested in the
It was also recognised that HPAs were primarily
to be used.
agreements in principle.
to those who are most closely affected by it” and
•
The report referred to is available here:
making the conservation process something that
that would significantly change the asset).
about “bringing conservation management nearer Excluded works (generally major changes
is “achieved with the owners” and not “done to them”.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/ uploads/attachment_data/file/78120/hrp_breport_
A colour coding approach was suggested to define
eightpilotprojects.pdf
works – either to highlight assets of importance on a Key to the HPA is
larger site, or to differentiate pre-agreed works from works not needing agreement for example, with the
•
A simplification of the administration of
exact method varying from site to site.
statutory controls, by providing pre-agreement on how various classes of mostly minor works will be carried out, thus removing the need for a
A range of sites were chosen for the pilot, with
long series of individual specific consents”
Darnall Works chosen as a test of the application of the HPA concept to an industrial archaeological
•
Promotion of “positive long-term proactive
asset. Interestingly for Portland Works, it was noted
strategic management of historic sites by
that there were no urban complexes in the types of
agreeing planned works normally requiring
historical site chosen. In the case of Darnall Works,
consent, enabling effective forward planning for
the Conservation Philosophy “explicitly recognises
example, in the application of grants”
the relationship between the commercial needs of a working industrial site and the responsibilities
•
“Enhanced certainty and clarity on
attached to historic assets of national or even
works requiring heritage consent; method and
international significance” also likely to be the case
materials used in works”
for Portland Works.
29.
Wild History
The accommodation of unplanned ‘wild’ activities
The images shown opposite suggest some
has been an import trait throughout Portland
modifications and features that add character to
Works’ history. It enabled the manufacture of
Portland Works. They also provide insights into how
stainless steel cutlery and has also characterised
unplanned activities have been accommodated
the buildings more contemporary history. Despite
throughout history. These ad-hoc modifications may
this, the introduction of new, unforeseen and
have a different type of heritage value and should
ad-hoc activities is only briefly mentioned in the
not be removed or taken back to their original state
conservation plan.
without consideration.
Innovation occurred at Portland Works because
It has only been possible to introduce this
in 1914 a scientist (Harry Brearley) and a cutlery
alternative type of heritage as part of the Cold
manager (Ernest Stuart) decided to work together
Spots document. However, this could be the
to experiment with samples of stainless steel. They
starting point for further investigations. These
set out to make stainless steel knife blades, and did
could take the form of research projects or artistic
so despite being told by many other manufacturers
interventions.
that it was not possible. They succeeded because they introduced new knowledge and new
The research group CHAT (Contemporary History
techniques into the Works.
and Archaeology in Theory) within UCL is an example of a university based research platform
More recently the unplanned introduction of
exploring innovative historical approaches by
artists, musicians and other non-metal crafts
valuing contemporary archaeology. Projects such
has led to continued collaborations at Portland
Encounters’ Sharrow Stories use art practice as a
Works. The building has been continually subject
way of encouraging alternative stories and histories
to improvised changes in order to accommodate
to be told.
unforeseen, innovative activities. The intention here is not to glamorise reckless modifications, but rather value the relationships and juxtapositions that tell interesting stories about the Works’ history. These are at risk of being lost since the improvised changes that facilitated them are often considered detrimental to the Works as a whole. By acknowledging and legitimising ‘wild histories’ of Portland Works - in addition to more conservative and conventional ones – a richer, multi-layered and dynamic understanding of the building can be created.
30.
Wild History Photographs
31.
Air Raid Wall Stencil
Tenant Wall Marking
Memorial Graffiti
Coloured Brickwork from Manufacture Process
Painted Door
Painted Border
Access to Roof
Machinery in Yard
Redundant Post Box
Rusted Sign
Brightly Coloured ad-hoc addition that does not compromise older structural opening
32.
2. Repair and Upgrade Measures
REPAIR AND UPGRADE MEASURES
We have looked at a number of measures to
An initial assessment of the U-values of all of these
improve the thermal performance of parts of the
measures (the rate of the heat loss through the
Works, from draught-stripping and gap-filling to
element of fabric) has also been provided. It should
insulation.
be noted that these make assumptions about the wall thicknesses and exact U-values of the existing
A number of sources have been consulted to
structure which may vary somewhat, given the
establish the principles for this: Nick Parsons’
nature of the building.
report, a number of English Heritage’s guidance documents and other sources listed at the end of
There is a Building Control requirement that
the chapter for reference.
elements of a building’s thermal envelope should be thermally upgraded if significant work is carried
Studio Polpo have set out a number of approaches
out on these. There is a recognition that for
to roof, wall and floor insulation that would suit
historic buildings, it may not be possible to bring
Portland Works (Fabric Build-ups). These take into
the performance of existing fabric up to current
account access issues and durability required, both
requirements, either because existing features
of which vary depending upon the spaces and
of interest would be lost (behind insulation for
tenants.
example), and so a reduced U-value is provided. Sheffield City Council’s Building Control Department
Fabric Build-ups
have stated that it would be acceptable in the case of Portland Works, to carry out significant repairs to thermal elements (roofs in particular) at the Works without thermal upgrade, if the affected
Fabric Build-up Costs
spaces/rooms linked to these are un-used, as the purpose of these works would be to prevent further deterioration and damage to the building.
A diagram has been prepared (Retrofit
All of the measures proposed (with exception of
Opportunities) that highlights the relative ease of
some insulation to concrete roofs and floors) are
upgrading the different elements of the building’s
based on natural products and are breathable.
fabric depending on occupancy of the spaces. For
Although this leads to some increase in costs, there
example an occupied space with a complex set up
are many benefits.
of machinery will require a great deal of disruption for works to the floor or walls, but windows may be
In older buildings, where the fabric is moisture
relatively easy to repair or replace.
permeable, allowing water vapour to move through and escape, the installation of modern vapour-closed materials (foam based insulants, cement renders etc.) causes this moisture to
Retrofit Opportunities
become trapped, resulting in damage to the structure and potential health issues from mould. The natural products specified in this report are also safer and more pleasant to work with, (ie not toxic or irritant) and are much less energy intensive to produce. Links to products specified can be found at the end of the chapter. Manufacturers guidance on installation should be sought in all instances.
35.
Fabric Build-ups
36.
Internal Wall Insulation
IWI.1
Breathable, single system by one supplier, bonded to wall
Internal Wall Insulation
IWI.2
Easily removeable, keeps wall behind untouched
ensure ceiling/floor void above insulated to avoid cold bridge and condensation issues, refer to NBT guidance
ensure ceiling/floor void above insulated to avoid cold bridge and condensation issues
existing 350mm solid brick wall with holes and gaps filled and mortar issues addressed by re-pointing with appropriate 8mmmortar. absorbent lime plaster lime
existing 350mm solid brick wall with holes and gaps filled and mortar issues addressed by re-pointing with appropriate 8mmmortar. absorbent lime plaster lime
60mm Pavadentro woodfibre insulation board fixed to wall as per manufacturer's instructions
20mm Gutex Multitherm woodfibre insulation board
10mm NBT lime or clay plaster
vapour control layer
NOTE: insulation to return along internal walls as per NBT guidance. Window reveals to be lined with 40mm Pavadentro
50mm Thermafleece TF sheepswool insulation between 50x50mm timbers studs at 600mm centres 15mm OSB 3 fixed to studs Note: frame sections pre-assembled with Gutex and VCL, VCL joints taped Note: frame sections pre-assembled with Gutex and VCL, taped/sealed between panels
skirting floor detail:ensure floor insulated where possible to avpid cold bridge and condensation issues, refer to NBT guidance
Detail: U-Value installed:
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
skirting floor detail:ensure floor insulated where possible to avoid cold bridge and condensation issues
3
IWI.1 0.46 W/m2K
Detail: U-Value installed:
2
0.30 W/m2K 0.70 W/m2K
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
1
£86.11 80mm
current
target
reduced
new
Notes: A robust system that is breathable. Relatively thick, also has benefits of thermal mass. Not suited to areas requiring a high number of wall fixings or where walls are likely to be subject to heavy knocks or harsh treatment.
Solid Floor Insulation
SFI.1
Replacement of floor slab, heavy duty & well insulated
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
3
IWI.2 0.37 W/m2K
2
0.30 W/m2K 0.70 W/m2K
1
£74.81 110mm
current
target
reduced
new
Notes: A robust system that is breathable. Relatively thick, also has benefits of thermal mass. More easily removable than IWI.1, and could be installed in fron of protected walls, or those with features requiring preservation. Cheaper, but more components and more complicated to install than IWI.1 however as well as being more space intensive.
Solid Floor Insulation
SFI.2
Quick to install and removable but not suited for heavy use.
65mm hydraulic lime screed
existing concrete floor slab
150mm Limecrete slab with expanded clay
damp proof membrane
geotextile membrane
50mmm Jablite expanded polystyrene insulation
150mm layer lightweight expanded clay aggregate
50 x 50mm treated softwood studs 18mm WBP plywood deck fixed to battens
NOTE: Foundation details vary, some are shallow and care must be taken to ensure that these are not undermined
Detail: U-Value installed:
SFI.1 0.30 W/m2K
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
£96.27 Finish height to match existing
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
0.25 W/m2K 0.70 W/m2K
3
Detail: U-Value installed:
2
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
1
current
target
reduced
new
Notes: Requires considerable disruption and removal of exsiting slab which may be a heritage issue. May of limited benefit to small rooms with large perimeter to floor area ratio. Depth of foundations unknown and needs to be checked prior to any works.
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
SFI.2 0.61 W/m2K 0.25 W/m2K 0.70 W/m2K
£43.70 70mm above current floor level
3
2
1
current
target
Notes: Easy to install and can be removed. Less insulative than SFI.1 but cheaper. Not suited to spaces where heavy machinery or loading are anticipated. Will raise the existing floor level which may have implications on doors, thresholds and skirtings.
reduced
new
Fabric Build-ups
37.
Pitched Roof Insulation
PR.1
For laying above flat ceilings where there is a roof void above
Pitched Roof Insulation
PR.2
For pitched roofs where the ceiling follows the roof slope
vapour barrier laid above
Thermafleece 150mm T35 Sheepswool insulation between joists existing (re-laid) slates
Thermafleece 100mm T35 Sheepswool insulation above joists
counter battens sarking membrane
existing rafters existing rafters
Thermafleece 150mm T35 Sheepswool insulation betwen joists on netting support fixed to joists
Gutex Thermoroom woodfibre insulation boards fixed to rafters. NOTE: needs structural assessment of load first
existing ceiling if suitable
new clay plaster finish
Detail: U-Value installed:
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
3
PR.1 0.14 W/m2K
Detail: U-Value installed:
2
0.16 W/m2K 0.35 W/m2K
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
1
£29.86 100mm above joists
current
target
reduced
new
Notes: Simple and easy to both install and remove. Care needs to be taken where electrical cables or lights are run above the ceilings as these may need protective hoods to prevent overheating and fire. Thermafleece may be substituted with mineral wool, or other similar product (see supplier list) of equivalent performance, however supplier should be consulted to check ceiling will take the loading.
Pitched Roof Insulation
PR.3
For pitched roofs where the ceiling follows the roof slope and both roof and ceiling are being replaced
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
3
PR.2 0.18 W/m2K
2
0.18 W/m2K 0.35 W/m2K
1
£137.05 120mm below joists
current
target
reduced
new
Notes: Insulation between and below existing joists leading to reduced room height may not be suitable where there are cornices or windows going up to wall/ceiling junction. Potential weight issues of woodfibre insulation, engineer and manufacturer should be contacted. Works could be done from above (when replacing roof) and below (when replacing ceiling).
Metal Roof Insulation
MR.1
For spaces with a corrugated metal roof that is to be replaced
existing rafters Thermafleece 150mm T35 Sheepswool insulation between joists existing (re-laid) slates
Kingspan KS1000 150mm foam insulated profile steel roof system
counter battens 50mm Gutex Ultratherm woodfibre insulation board as sarking
existing steel purlins (if suitable)
softwood battens existing truss/rafter (indicative only)
100mm Hemp insulation batts below rafters. NOTE: needs structural assessment of load first new plasterboard ceiling
Detail: U-Value installed:
PR.3 0.18 W/m2K
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
£117.65 100mm below rafters, 50mm above rafters
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
0.18 W/m2K 0.35 W/m2K
3
2
Detail: U-Value installed:
MR.1 0.14 W/m2K
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
£75 150mm
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
1
current
target
reduced
new
Notes: Reduced room height if sloping ceiling, potential weight issues of insulation build-up. Needs to be done as part of re-roofing, ridges raised may lead to flashing issues. Ceiling needs to be replaced and increased depth may cl;ash with cornices, or windows at ceiling/wall junction.
0.18 W/m2K NA
3
2
1
current
target
reduced
Notes: Simple and robust roof replacement of existing metal roof with whole new roof system. The system includes rooflight sections, the size and position of these will need to be specified.
new
Fabric Build-ups
38.
External Roof Insulation
ER.1
For flat solid roofs that need to be accessible
Ceiling/Suspended Floor Insulation
CE.1
For rooms where the floor can be lifted or removed
all penetrations, upstands and details as per manufacturer's instructions
existing floorboards lifted and replaced
140mm Celotex TC3000/EL3000 rigid insulation bonded to finish below Firestone TPO roof membrane
existing concrete deck (thickness assumed to be 150mm) existing ceiling retained
existing roof covering prepared to take insulation layer
200mm Thermafleece sheepswool insulation on netting fixed to joists
vapour permeable membrane
existing joists
Detail: U-Value installed:
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
3
ER.1 0.18 W/m2K
Detail: U-Value installed:
2
0.18 W/m2K 0.35 W/m2K
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
1
£85.38 150mm
current
target
reduced
new
Notes: Some detail around rooflights/pipe penetrations need to be carefully resolved. Raises roof height which impacts stairs and doors.
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
3
CE.1 0.18 W/m2K
2
0.18 W/m2K 0.35 W/m2K
1
£23.35 Within existing structure
current
target
reduced
new
Notes: Disruptive to install but allows room below to function un-interrupted. Provides thermal as well as increased acoustic separation.
Ceiling/Suspended Floor Insulation
CE.2
For rooms where the ceiling is being replaced
Basement Tanking
BT.1
Combination of wall & floor insulation with waterproof membrane
Newton system 500 tanking membrane Wall build-up as IWI.2 Cavity drain linked to sump and pump on 20mm clean graded stone
existing joists existing floorboards retained
Newton system 500 tanking membrane 50mmm Jablite expanded polystyrene insulation existing concrete floor slab chopped out to form channel at perimeter 50 x 50mm treated softwood studs both ways 18mm WBP plywood deck fixed to battens
20mm battens existing ceiling replaced with 15mm plasterboard 200mm Thermafleece T35sheepswool insulation on netting fixed to joists vapour permeable membrane
Detail: U-Value installed:
CE.2 0.18 W/m2K
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
£45.35 35mm reduced ceiling height
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
0.18 W/m2K 0.35 W/m2K
3
2
BT.1
Cost/m2: Cost/m Installed thickness:
wall £101.49 / floor £66.11 wall £70.95 (slot drain) + £1,200 sump pump wall: 113mm / floor: 98mm
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
1
current
target
Notes: Disruptive to install but allows the room above to function un-interrupted. Provides thermal as well as increased acoustic separation. If opportunity arises to replace ceilings this is generally easier than lifting and replacing floorboards to the room above to install CE.1.
reduced
new
3
Detail: U-Value installed:
wall: 0.37/ floor 0.61
wall: 0.30/ floor: 0.25 wall: 0.70/ floor: 0.70
2
1
current
target
reduced
new
Notes: A removable tanking solution for basement areas that carries away moisture rather than trapping it in the walls. Does require sump & pump. Uses IWI.2 walll insulation method and SFI.1 floor method. Disruptive.
Fabric Build-up Costs
39.
Portland Work Schedule of upgrade systems
labour
plant
materials m2 cost
labour
REPAIRS SG
RP
CI.1
seal small holes and gaps in wall, especially around services 3m x 6m wall in a poor state; one side only
20.00
5.00
25.00
3m x 6m wall in a reasonable state; one side only
10.00
2.50
12.50 37.50 CI.2
ribbon pointing around doors & windows between frame & wall burnt sand mastic (seal around window frame ext) burnt sand mastic (seal around door frame ext) linseed oil putty (glass bedded into frame); 6 nr pieces putty pointing allowed; no glass allowed
20.00
8.67
28.67 per window (1.0w x 1.65h)
20.00
8.53
28.53 per door frame (1.0x x 2.1h)
30.00
8.66
allow for 6nr pieces of glass per window
30.00
105.00
38.66 per window (1.0w x 1.65h)
INTERNAL WALL INSULATION IWI.1
ERI.1
1.00
0.45
1.45
7.00
14.90
21.90 23.35
Access from room below; Existing Floorboards in place 200mm Thermafleece TF 35 insulation between joists on netting vapour membrane below joists
7.00
14.90
21.90
1.00
0.45
1.45
7.50
4.00
11.50
6.00
4.50
10.50 45.35
15.00
5.00
20.00
12.00 15.00
28.38 10.00
40.38 25.00 85.38
75.00
75.00
EXTERNAL ROOF INSULATION
10mm NBT plaster
6.00
15.18
21.18
Existing flat concrete roof; 150mm build up comprising; patch-repair existing covering
Pavadentro board NBT plaster Has to cover window frame
4.50 8.00
26.98 25.45
31.48 33.45
140mm Celotex TC3000/EL3000 insulation bonded to finish below Firestone Ultraply TPO
Existing 350mm Solid Wall with 78mm build up comprising:
materials m2 cost
vapour barrier over joists 200mm Thermafleece TF 35 insulation between joists on netting
new battens new ceiling (plasterboard and skim??)
135.00 173.66 TOTAL for window only
plant
SUSPENDED FLOOR INSULATION BETWEEN SPACES Access from room via floor; Existing Floorboards (removed and replaced)
86.11 IWI.2
MRI.1
Existing 350mm Solid Wall with 110mm build up comprising: 25mm ventilated cavity 20mm Gutex Multitherm on timber battens on vapour control layer 50mm Thermafleece TF 35 insulation between 50mm timber studs at 600mm centres 15mm OSB; breather membrane
2.50
0.25
2.75
20.00
13.80
33.80
11.50 10.00
11.51 5.25
23.01 15.25
Kingspan KS1000 system 150mm core insulation thickness
PRI.1 SOLID FLOOR INSULATION
150mm Limecrete slab with expanded clay
2.50
11.25
13.75
5.75
11.36
17.11
11.50
25.91
37.41
10.00
18.00
28.00
96.27 SFI.2
Existing slab with 70mm build up comprising:
dpm Jabfloor Classic 50mm EPS insulation 50 x 50mm timber battens at 600mm spacing 18mm WBP ply floor
inc
4.50
13.46
17.96
3.50
6.95
10.45
1.00
0.45
1.45 29.86
PRI.2
65mm Hydraulic Lime screed
inc
PITCHED ROOF INSULATION Cold roof, insulation at ceiling level; 100mm build up comprising: 150mm Thermafleece TF 35 insulation between joists 100mm Thermafleece TF 35 insulation above joists vapour membrane above insulation
Existing earth with build up level as existing comprising: geotextile membrane 150mm layer lightweight expanded clay aggregate
inc
75.00
74.81
SFI.1
METAL ROOF INSULATION Replace corrugated metal roof with 150mm build up comprising:
Warm roof, insulation at rafter level; slightly RAISED RIDGE (heavy); 120mm build up below rafters comprising: 120mm Gutex Thermoroomboard below rafters with clay plaster finish
7.50 10.00
37.15 13.00
44.65 23.00
3.50 1.00
6.95 0.45
10.45 1.45
5.50
2.00
7.50
20.00
30.00
50.00 137.05
6.00
4.50
10.50
3.50
9.00
12.50
3.50
6.95
10.45
5.50
28.70
34.20
20.00
30.00
50.00 117.65
existing rafters
1.00 4.00
0.45 2.25
1.45 6.25
7.50
4.00
11.50
10.00
14.50
24.50 43.70
100mm Thermafleece insulation betwteen rafters vapour barrier 25mm counter battens new spanish slate roofing on battens
PRI.3
The build-up codes in the left-hand column of the tables on this page refer to the fabric build up diagrams on the preceding pages. The initial two sets however, are for sealing gaps (SG) which is an allowance for filling holes in walls, gaps around services etc. that allow draughts and air leakage. The second of these is for ribbon pointing (RP) around doors and windows, again to stop unwanted air leakage and draughts. All rates are square meter rates (for labour and materials) unless noted otherwise.
Warm roof, insulation at rafter level; slightly RAISED RIDGE, access from above/below; 100mm build up below rafters comprising: new plasterboard ceiling/ skim 100mm hemp batts below rafters existing rafters 100mm Thermafleece insulation betwteen rafters 50mm Gutex Ultratherm over rafters as sarking new slate roofing on battens
BT.1
Prepare existing wall as necessary and apply Newton system 500 tanking membrane to wall. Cut out slot within perimeter of existing concrete floor, lay cavity drain inc corners etc on 20mm Clean graded stone, make good all works disturbed. Allow to connect drain to sump and pump. Prepare existing concrete floor and lay Newton 508 clear floor tanking system. Provide and fit 50mm x 50mm softwood treated battens to form stud framework, infill with 50mm Jablite expanded polystyrene insulation, overlay and deck with 18mm WBP plywood fixed to battens. Type IWI.2 wall build up Install sump and pump to remove moisture from walls into drainage system. Provisional Sum allowance – further details required for accurate price.
26.68
per m
70.95
41.80 74.81
1,200.00
Retrofit Opportunities
40.
Easy
32C
33C
Medium
Walls
Floors
Ceiling/Roof
Windows
Doors
Walls
Floors
Ceiling/Roof
Windows
Doors
Hard
31C
34B-2
30D
34B-1
29D
Second Floor
4C-2
Easy Medium Hard
8C-1
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
14B-1
5C
17G-1
4C
17G-2
3D-2
14B-2
14B-3
14F-4 3D-1
Meter 15G-1 2D-1 9B 15G-2
16G
15G-3 10B
2D-2 10A 12E
WC
Meter
1A 11A
13A w
Ground Floor
Retrofit Opportunities
41.
21C
22C
20C
Easy Medium
Doors
Windows
Ceiling/Roof
Walls
Floors
Hard
23B
Meter
23B 28G
26E-3 25E 19D 26E-2 24A
4C-2
18A
Easy Medium
27A
Walls
26A-1
8C-1
8C-2
7C
6C
5C
Floors
Hard
25-A
4C
First Floor
Meter
14B-1
17G-1
17G-2
3D-2
14B-2 Easy
Medium
14F-4
Doors
Windows
3D-1 Meter
Ceiling/Roof
Walls
Hard Floors
14B-3
15G-1
Easy
2D-1
Medium Hard
9B Doors
Windows
Floors
Ceiling/Roof
Walls
15G-2
16G
15G-3 10B
2D-2 10A 12E
WC Occupied
Meter
1A 11A
13A 0D-1
Unknown
w
Unused
Portland Works Retrofit Opportunit Ground Floor
Used as Storage
0A-1
0A-2
Basement
How to Use: Retrofit Opportunities
42.
3.
This drawing provides a clear overview of the retrofit opportunities at Portland Works, based on the ease of upgrading different architectural elements
The diagram shows that this space is currenlty occupied. It would be easy to ugrade doors and windows in it, less easy to upgrade the ceiling and hard to upgrade the walls and floors.
7C
5HWUR多W 2SSRUWXQLWLHV
27.
4C-2
Easy Medium
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
14B-1
5C
17G-1
Doors
Floors
4C
17G-2
3D-2
14B-2
Easy
Windows
Walls
8C-1
Ceiling/Roof
Hard
14B-3
14F-4 3D-1
Medium
Meter 15G-1 2D-1
Hard
9B 15G-2
16G
15G-3
Doors
2D-2 10A 12E
4C-2
Meter
WC Occupied
1A 11A
Easy
13A
Medium w
2.
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
14B-1
5C
4C
Portland Works Retrofit Opportunities Ground Floor
17G-1
17G-2
3D-2
14B-2
14B-3
14F-4
Easy Medium
Doors
Walls
Floors
Windows
3D-1
Hard
Meter
Ceiling/Roof
4C-2
15G-1
Easy
2D-1
Medium Hard
9B Doors
Windows
Walls
Floors
15G-2 Ceiling/Roof
This chart is used to show how easy or difficult it is to upgrage different architectural elements. Each room has been given its own chart, based on current 6C 5C 4C occupancy.
7C
8C-2
16G
15G-3 10B
2D-2 10A 12E
WC
Meter
17G-1
Occupied
17G-2
Meter
1A 11A
13A w
Unknown
3D-2
0D-1
Unused
Portland Works Retrofit Opportunities Ground Floor
Used as Storage
14F-4 0A-1
3D-1 Unknown 0A-2 Unused
15G-1 2D-1
15G-2
Used as Storage
Portland Works Retrofit Opportunities Basement
16G
15G-3
2D-2
1.
12E
1A
13A w
Portland Works Retrofit Opportunities
This key tells you which spaces in Portland Works are occupied.
Doors
Walls
8C-1
Used as Storage
Floors
Unused
Windows
Hard
Unknown
Ceiling/Roof
Windows
Ceiling/Roof
Floors
Walls
10B
Specific Guidance Referred to in this Area:
Product details specified:
Pavadent Woodfibre Insulation, NBT Lime Plaster (IWI.1) Natural Building Technologies The Hangar Worminghall Road Oakley Bucks HP18 9UL Tel: 01844 338 338 http://www.natural-building.co.uk/systems/renovation/pavadentro
Gutex Multitherm, Gutex Thermoroom, Gutex Ultratherm (IWI.2, PR.2, PR.3) Ecological Building Systems Ltd Pacific House Parkhouse Carlisle Cumbria CA3 0LJ United Kingdom Tel: 05600 758025 http://www.ecologicalbuildingsystems.com/products/gutex-wood-fibre/
Thermafleece TF, Thermafleece T35 (IWI.2, PR.1, CE.1, CE.2) Soulands Gate Dacre Penrith Cumbria CA11 0JF Tel: 017684 86285 http://www.thermafleece.com/product/thermafleece-tf35
Jablite insulation (SFI.2) Boothferry Works Howden East Riding of Yorkshire DN14 7EA Tel: 0870 600 3666 http://www.jablite.co.uk
“Heritage Works, The Use of Historic Buildings in Regeneration. A Toolkit of Good Practice.” English Heritage 2013. http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/professional/ advice/advice-by-topic/heritage-and-growth/ heritage-works/
Kingspan (MR.1) Kingspan Insulation Ltd Pembridge Leominster Herefordshire HR6 9LA Tel: 01544 388 601 www.kingspaninsulation.co.uk/
“Energy Efficiency and Historic Buildings” English Heritage, 2011. Also English Heritage’s detailed guidelines on the following: Insulating Cold Roofs; Insulating Flat Roofs; Insulating Solid Ground Floors; Insulating Suspended
Celotex Insulation (ER.1) Celotex Limited, Lady Lane Industrial Estate, Hadleigh, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP7 6BA. Tel: 01473 820850 http://www.celotex.co.uk/
Newton Tanking System (BT.1) John Newton & Co Ltd. Newton House, 17-19 Sovereign Way Tonbridge, Kent TN9 1RH United Kingdom Tel: 020 3432 2588 http://www.newton-membranes.co.uk/
Floors. These are also available online: http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/ guidelines-and-standards/
“Responsible Retrofit of Traditional Buildings”, The Sustainable Traditional Buildings Alliance, 2012. http://www.spab.org.uk/downloads/STBA%20 RESPONSIBLE-RETROFIT.pdf
“Survey and Repair of Traditional Buildings, A Sustainable Approach”, Richard Oxley, Donhead Publishing Lts, 2003
Limecrete Floor (SFI.1) Womersleys Ltd. Walkley Lane, Heckmondwike, WF16 0PG Tel: 01924 400 651 http://www.womersleys.co.uk/acatalog/
Hemp Batt Insulation (PR.3) Black Mountain Insulation Ltd Unit B, Tir Llwyd Industrial Estate Rhyl, Denbighshire LL18 5JA Tel: 01745 361911 http://www.blackmountaininsulation.com
43.
3. Analysis and Proposals
DATA VISUALISATION
Of these three diagrams, the first two show repairs
The third of these three sheets (Vision Plan Graphic
and tenancy data, and the third maps out
3) uses the repair data from sheet one, and
potential funding bids. These have been produced
adds another level of information from the fabric
to make some of the current information (listed
upgrade costs. This sheet can then be used to
in the beginning of this report) more useable by
highlight the breakdown of funding bids and to
As part of this report we have produced a number
tenants and steering groups. It visualises information
compare either different ways of allocating money
of diagrams and charts that map key aspects of
that may be lost or overwhelming in other formats.
in the same bid, or how successive bids might work.
Repairs, Tenancy and Future Funding
the Works in order to provide information to assist
The former may be of use when helping steering
future decision-making, the planning of funding bids
The first of these diagrams (Vision Plan Graphic
groups decide on what elements of work to bid for,
and the phasing of work.
1) displays the cost information from the 2011
the latter when planning bids, or to show funders a
Bond Bryan Condition Survey, relative to the parts
long-term and considered strategy.
The first set of Vision Plan Diagrams use existing data
of the Works that the repair works relate to (this
and make it more accessible.
information has been checked by Richard Fletcher
Again, the sheet is intended to supplement typically
Associates who have confirmed that it is still
rather less engaging spread-sheets, and to make
applicable in 2013).
the connections between sums of money and how
Vision Plan Graphic 1
and where they are being spent, clear. The graphic gives a sense of relative amounts of
Vision Plan Graphic 2
Vision Plan Graphic 3
work per block, and also for each element of the
All of the above diagrams are designed to printed
building (walls, roofs, windows etc). It also gives an
at A1 size for use in meetings, or as information
overview and ‘at-a-glance’ impression of areas of
posters. They are also legible at A3 size. These, (in
priority, representing the recommendations of the
particular Vision Plan Graphic 3), could be updated
Survey for essential and subsequent works.
with new information in the future.
This sheet can used to plan future funding bids, or the allocation of budgets for building works. (The third sheet demonstrates an example of this). The second sheet (Vision Plan Graphic 2) displays tenancy data for the Works. It brings together tenant (individual or business) names, location in block and floor terms, unit size and rental income from the unit. This graphic also gives an indication of the nature of the work being done in the unit, from heavy duty (welding, motor-winding) to studio (art/ music) use, to give an idea of how these uses are spread between floors and blocks. The information on this sheet can be used to understand what thermal or acoustic upgrade measures may be best suited to existing spaces, where there are under-used spaces, and potential locations for new uses.
47.
Vision Plan Graphic 1
49.
Vision Plan Graphic 2
AREA 79.57 (sq.mt)
33C
T21
AREA 39.5 (sq.mt)
32C
T21
AREA 39.5 (sq.mt)
31C
SF
Second Floor
T21
x4 AREA 174.1 (sq.mt)
AREA 82.14 (sq.mt)
27A
22C
Tx
AREA 39.55 (sq.mt)
AREA 40.54 (sq.mt)
26A-1
21C
Tx AREA 57.55 (sq.mt)
34B-2
AREA 53.81 (sq.mt)
25A
T8 T7
T23
SF
T22
x4
FF
T26
23B
FF
AREA 62.15 (sq.mt)
13A
AREA 3
AREA 43.94 (sq.mt)
T18
T6
T8
AREA 85.16 (sq.mt)
8C-1
T5
AREA 57.84 (sq.mt)
14B-3
T9
7C
T1
G D
F
11A AREA 30 (sq.mt)
10A
up p
E A
14B-2
AREA 55.76 (sq.mt)
T8 RENT (per month)
T7
AREA 121 (sq.mt)
Ground Floor
1A
9B
T1
AREA 2
AREA 31.61 (sq.mt)
5C
T4
AREA 3
T7 AREA 93.56 (sq.mt)
T5
4C
AREA 2
T3
GF
TOTAL AREA DIVIDED BY UNIT TYPE (sq.mt)
BLOCK
Basement
T10
AREA 20.19 (sq.mt)
T24
AREA 99.36 (sq.mt)
6C
AREA 20.1 (sq.mt)
10B
A
T--
AREA 10.77 (sq.mt)
14B-1
FF
AREA 2
AREA 11.20 (sq.mt)
B
SF
AREA 1
AREA 10.8 (sq.mt)
C
AREA 6
AREA 86.10 (sq.mt)
AREA 104.23 (sq.mt)
18A
T16
FF 8C-2
First Floor
T25
AREA 173.3 (sq.mt)
20C
AREA 29.07 (sq.mt)
34B-1
AREA 38.05 (sq.mt)
24A
T17
A
TOTAL AREA DIVIDED BY UNIT TYPE (sq.mt)
BLOCK
B
TOTAL AREA DIVIDED BY UNIT TYPE (sq.mt)
BLOCK
C
B
51.
This chart shows how tenants are distributed throughout the works, by block and by floor, the way in which they use their spaces (i.e. music studio, or heavy workshop such as the forge) and the rental income from the spaces. By giving an overview of the distribution of different types of space, but also which spaces may be under- or over-valued, decisions can be made as to the location of new tenants, or changed rental strategies over time. Studio Polpo, September 2013
21
21
21
17
KEY:-
17G-2
25
16
6
T11
1
4
3
UNIT
WORKSHOP (HEAVY)
TENANT
WORKSHOP (LIGHT) STUDIO EMPTY
AREA 67.2 (sq.mt)
30D
Tx
TENANT LIST AREA 83.65 (sq.mt)
AREA 37.63 (sq.mt)
29D
SF
FF
Tx
28G
T20
AREA 56.31 (sq.mt)
5
1
PORTLAND WORKS
17G-2 AREA 106.9 (sq.mt)
FF
19D
AREA 31.37 (sq.mt)
T15
26E-3
Tx
AREA 80.09 (sq.mt)
17G-1
AREA 22.58 (sq.mt)
3D-2
T3
26E-2
T3
AREA 47.23 (sq.mt)
AREA 37.77 (sq.mt)
2D-2
T2
AREA 22.08 (sq.mt)
2D-1
FF
16G
Tx
15G-3
T8
T16 T17 T18
T19 T20 T21 T22 T23 T24 T25 T26 T27
Stuart Mitchell Knives Mick Price Singing Knives Shelley Hughes Carl Whitham Kimmy Yeah Neil Robinson Crown Tools
GF
T13 T0
FF TOTAL REVENUE
TOTAL REVENUE
DIVIDED BY FLOOR
DIVIDED BY UNIT TYPE
(£/sqft/permonth)
(£/sqft/permonth)
AREA 28.87 (sq.mt)
15G-2
AREA 51.66 (sq.mt)
T3
T15
Iron Anchor A.Cole MB Roofing Tolly Boy Portland Committee Sequoia Sound System Artists (Price & Sewell) Walmar Products Pam Hague
SF
T27
AREA 5.45 (sq.mt)
25E
T10 T11 T12 T13 T14
AREA 33.52 (sq.mt)
AREA 88.61 (sq.mt)
AREA 22.29 (sq.mt)
3D-1
T11
T0 Landlord office T1 Square Pegs T2 The Gentleman T3 PML Plating T4 RJS T5 Lynthorpe Joinery T6 Dosh Band rehearsal room T7 Mick Shaw Engraving T8 Quality Cabinetry T9
12E
AREA 67.20 (sq.mt)
T9
14F-4
T12 G
AREA 23.20 (sq.mt)
T10
15G-1
T1
A
F E
B
D TOTAL AREA DIVIDED BY UNIT TYPE (sq.mt)
BLOCK
D
TOTAL AREA DIVIDED BY UNIT TYPE (sq.mt)
BLOCK
E
TOTAL AREA DIVIDED BY UNIT TYPE (sq.mt)
BLOCK
F
TOTAL AREA DIVIDED BY UNIT TYPE (sq.mt)
BLOCK
G C
TOTAL REVENUE (£) DIVIDED BY BLOCK
Vision Plan Graphic 3
53.
How to Use: Vision Plan Graphic 1
54.
This chart shows the nature, location and priority of repair costs.
Reading down this column shows all the repairs required for Block A. It can be noted that this is where the majority of the repair work over the next five years is required.
Vision Plan Graphic 1
1.
2.
These are the repairs required for Block C. It can be noted that the whole block can be repaired with a relatively small budget.
Reading across this row shows all the roof repairs required. It can be noted that this is where the majority of the urgent work is required.
3. Building element types requiring repair
35.
Each bar represents ÂŁ1000 of required repair costs
The bars are coloured to show urgent health & safety repair costs, repair costs that could be done in the next two years and repairs that can be done in the next five years, as outlined in the Bond Bryant report
How to Use: Vision Plan Graphic 3
55.
This chart visualises the repair and upgrade measures that have been included in the J P Getty funding application.
1.
The strategy to use the potential funding to repair as many roofs and prevent damage to the building by water can be seen from the tag positions and
The red tags indicate repair costs that are included in the J P Getty funding application
This scenario focuses on the J P Getty funding application.
The orange tags show additional upgrade costs Vision Plan Graphic 3
39.
2.
A more detailed breakdown of repair and upgrade costs is show here
MAPPING OCCUPANCY
Occupancy Around the Clock
Undersused Spaces
We have produced a number of diagrams linked to that which shows the tenancy data, and
We have also mapped out areas that have been
showing how the Works are used at different times
identified by the Building Manager as either empty,
by different tenants (Occupancy Mapping).
problematic or underused (Retrofit Opportunities). Although some of these spaces are linked to
Occupancy Mapping
tenants (and rented), the way in which they are used is not beneficial to the Works. Examples of this include non-essential storage, sub-letting (and in one case sub-division to create habitable space,
These can inform the planning of new, or shared spaces in terms of their use and location. In particular, any new spaces that are to act as public interfaces, or shared meeting/exhibition spaces may have different uses at different times. These might depend on access to tenants who are makers (and therefore not around at certain times) or require both quiet and evening availability for meetings (and therefore not work well next to band spaces) for example. The diagrams shown here display typical tenant occupancy for a 24hr period on weekdays and weekends, as well as showing this occupancy linked to location to give a sense where the building is quiet or underused. Tenants are, again, broadly distinguished by their work (makers, artists and musicians).
56.
but in breach of an number fire safety guidelines) and areas only accessible by narrow and noncompliant stairs. The diagrams shown previously in this report make this visible and can start a conversation amongst tenants and steering groups as to how best to use the spaces.
PROPOSALS
Other alternatives indicated are biomass boilers
Retrofitting and Relocating
Heating Proposals
and electric heaters. The former can often be employed where there is a steady supply of waste wood on site, or nearby. A number of sawmills, for example, use woodchip boilers to heat their
Through cross-referencing with other diagrams,
The Works is currently either unheated, or heated
spaces. This, at present, could go some way to
suitable new uses can be identified (by looking
by various methods installed by tenants over
reducing the need to accommodate or remove
at times of use and adjacent occupancies for
the years (see heating map). A number of these
waste, and make a good use of timber shavings,
example). Empty or cleared spaces may also be
heating solutions are at best inefficient, and at worst
sawdust and woodchip.
the most suitable for more substantial renovation
potentially unsafe. Due to the nature of the work
and refurbishment works, such as floor and wall
being undertaken in many spaces, there is no need
There is a problem in that the supply of waste
insulation.
for heating (i.e. in the forge or some workshops
wood from site cannot be guaranteed (due to
were the work involves physical activity), however
varying processes or workloads and future tenancy
We have used this information to inform the Retrofit
in other spaces accommodating more sedentary
patterns) and external supplies of wood are
Proposals, Proposals Diagram 1 and Relocation
activity (such as the artists spaces in Block C for
required. Although there are number of woodchip
Proposals.
example) this lack of proper heating, coupled
schemes from local forests, issues are then that
with the poor thermal performance of the building
the growing, or transport of timber, just to be burnt
Likely costs of these works can be obtained
makes the spaces un-useable for long periods at a
causes much higher carbon emissions. These boilers
from the repair charts, as well as more detailed
time during winter.
are also costly so a single unit, burning wood waste
information from the Fabric Upgrade information part of the report.
Retrofit Proposals
Proposals Diagram 1
Relocation Proposals
from the whole site would be best employed to also This variety of both use, and the variety and age of
provide hot water and space heating. However
the building fabric, make any centralised system of
the distribution of heat/water through an efficient
heating unsuitable and problematic.
pipe network and the storage of timber make this a more difficult option.
With the potential to open and refurbish previously neglected spaces however, comes the opportunity
Electric heating eliminates the need for water
to assess how these might be used. A more
pipework but can be less efficient. In terms of
centralised way of heating those used by smaller
sustainability, this becomes a good option should
scale makers and craftspeople (who may be sitting
the grid become substantially ‘decarbonised’, i.e
relatively still throughout most of the day) may well
move away from coal, oil, long-distance biomass
be more cost effective, especially after works to
etc.
reduce ‘leakiness’ of the fabric and insulate. The Heating Proposals Diagram indicates possible
Building Management / Tenancy Issues
networks of small highly efficient gas combi-boilers
Heating Proposals
that could serve a number of rooms and offer simple and intuitive controls to individual tenants. These have been shown serving newly empty spaces in blocks A, D and E. The installation of pipework would have to be carefully considered to ensure compatibility with the old fabric of the building and at a time when other works where being done. The system would allow service contracts to be put in place to cover a number of very similar installations, making running the Works easier.
57.
Occupancy Mapping (Coloured by Tenant Type)
58.
7:00
6:00
8:00
0 5:0
9:0 0
T25 T23 Carl W She hit T16 lly Hu am gh The Art es ists
0 4:0
:00 10
3:0 0
T T17 W 21 Mic kP alma rice rP T12 MB roduc ts Roo fing T8 Qu ality T5 Lynthorpe Cab inet ry T4 RJS
T2 Th eG en tle m en
00 11:
24:00
13:00
mmy Yeah T25 Ki ging Knives T22 Sin uoia q e S 5 1 T
1:00
12:00
T20 Stua rt M i T13 T T18 tchel T11 A ollyboy Pam l Kn ndy Ha ives C T10 Iron gu Anc ole e T7 M hor ick Sha L Plating M P 3 w T quare Pegs T1 S
T6 Do sch
2:00
tland Electrical T9 Por
00 23:
14:0 0
:00 2 2
15 :00
:00 16
2 1 :00
18:00
19:00
20:0 0
sporadic use
00 17:
regular use
summer use only
storage use only
Tenant � Code
Tenant � Name
Tenant � Type
T1
Square � Pegs
Metalwork
T2
The � Gentlemen
T3 T4
PML � Plating RJS
T5
Lynthorpe
T6
Dosch �
T7 T8
Mick � Shaw Quality � Cabinetry
T9
Portland � Electrical
T10
Iron � Anchor
T11 T12
Andy � Cole M � B� Roofing
T13
Tollyboy
T14
Portland � Committee
Musician
Nature � of � Wo r k Manufacture � of� bespoke � patented � coat � hooks � for � schools
Unlike � other � musicians � at � Portland � Works, � The� Gentlemen � are � a� full� time � band. �
De s cr ip t io n � of � Use Since� the � majority � of� work � is� carried � out � during � school � summer � holidays � Square � Pegs � work � patterns � are � split � seasonally .� May�-� Oct� are � the � busiest � period. � During� summer � will� work � long� hours � and� weekends. � During� winter � will� work � more � regular � 9-5� Mon�-� Fri Sporadic � use � of� rehearsal � space � during � the � day,� evening � and� weekend. � More � likely� to � use � the � space � during � evenings. � Big� in� Norway � where � they � will� tour � for � long� periods � of� time. St e a dy� 8am -4pm. � Rarely� evenings � and� weekends Comes� to � the � works � for � half � an� hour � at � the � beginning � and� end � of� day.�
Metalwork Silver � pla t in g Other � craft/ � Maintenance � of� Sheffield � hallam � Student � manufacture/constr properties uction Other � craft/ � Manufacture � of� wooden � double � glazed � sash � Regularly � work � long� hours. � Work� split � between � manufacturing � at � PW� and� manufacture/constr windows on� site � installation, � however � there � is� normally � at � least � one � person � at � the � uction works. � Lynthorpe � have � a� long� waiting � list � which � means � that � their � work � is� less � sporadic � than � other � manufacturers � at � PW.� Musician
"Rock � and� Roll,� Rhythm � and� Blues". � Play� lots � Use � their � space � before � and� after � gigs � to � load � and� unload � equipment. � Could� of� gigs � in� and� around � Sheffield be� unloading � late � at � night. �
Metalwork Metal � etching � Other � craft/ � Bespoke � Kitchen� Fitter � Completely � self � manufacture/constr sufficient. � Workload � varies. � uction Other � craft/ � Repair,� rewind � and� supply � of� electric � motors manufacture/constr uction Metalwork Iron � gate � manufacture. � Motorbike � repair. � Metalwork Manufacture � of� metal � tools. � Other � craft/ � Roofing� and� bu ildin g manufacture/constr uction Metalwork Manufacturing � of� high� end, � bespoke � chastity � belts. �
Steady � 9:30 �-� 5:00. � Might � pop� in� on� weekends. � Length � of� time � at � PW� varies � depending � on� current � workload. � No� Seasonal � patterns. � Not� during � weekends. �
T15
Sequoia �
T16
The � Artists
Art
T17
Walmar � Products
T18
Pam � Hague
Other � craft/ � manufacture/constr uction Metalwork Grinding � cutter � blades � for � the � lino-cutting � trade. �
Musician
Works � part � time. � 3� days � a� week � 10 -4.
T19 T20
Stuart � Mitchell � Knives
T21
Mick � Price
T22
Singing � Knives
T23
Shelly � Hughes
Art
Full � time � a rt is t
Spo ra dic� since � she � is� sometimes � an� 'artist � in� residence' � at � other � locations
T24
Carl � Whitam
Art
Photography. � Specialises � in� industrial � and � architectural � photographs. �
PW� used � for � postproduction. � Away� photographing � for � periods � of� time � (around � two � weeks) � before � returning � to � the � works. � Will� work � evenings. � Lends� space � out � for � exhibitions � since � it� is� accessible � from � the � street. �
T25
Kimmy � Yeah
Musician
Band. � Also� have � other � work � commitments
Metalwork Knife � maker. � Primarily � hunting � knives � and� Steady � 10 -4.� Will� come � in� occasionally � on� sat � (around � once � a� month) the � occasional � sword. Other � craft/ � Full� time � job� elsewhere. � Rarely� at � works. manufacture/constr uction Musician Record � Label,� project � alongside � other � work � weekends � and� evenings, � once � or� twice � a� week. � Occasional � mornings. commitments. � Group� of� five � people � who � use � the � space � a� the � same � time.
� Steady � 7:30 -4:30 � Mon-Fri
Sporadic � .�� Will� sometimes � work � in� the � evenings � and� sometimes � on� Saturdays. � Steady � 9�-� 4.� Will� work � Saturdays � if� there � is� work. � Us e � space � as � store. �
provide � sound � systems � for � Sheffield � dub� sporadic � use � during � evening � and� weekends. � events � Studios � for � 5-6� artists � who � work � at � different � Seasonal. � Becomes � too � cold� to � work � in� winter. � Art� is� a� hobby � alongside � times. � other � permanent � employment � so � will� work � sporadically � for � 2�- 3� hours � at � a� time � throughout � the � week. � Cabinet � m a ke r 9 -4� mon -fri. � Away� for � long� periods. �
Sporadic � 9�-� 4.� Will� also � spend � long� period � in� Australia
USE OF PORTLAND WORKS: WEEKDAYS
Use � space � around � two � evenings � a� week, � including � weekends. � Never � during � the � day.�
Occupancy Mapping (Coloured by Tenant Type)
59.
7:00
6:00
8:00
0 5:0
9:0 0
0 4:0
T16 The Art ists
:00 10
3:0 0
T2 Th eG en tle m en
T6 Do sch
2:00
00 11:
T20 Stuart Mi
tchell Kniv es
T11 A ndy C T10 Iron Anc ole hor
12:00
Pegs
mmy Yeah T25 Ki ging Knives T22 Sin uoia q e S 5 1 T
13:00 14:0 0
00 23:
24:00
1:00
T1 Square
:00 2 2
1 5 :00
00 17:
2 1 :00
18:00
20:0 0
19:00
sporadic use
:00 16
regular use
summer use only
storage use only
metalworkers
other craft / manufacture / construction
musicians
artists
USE OF PORTLAND WORKS: WEEKENDS
Occupancy Mapping (Coloured by Block)
60.
0 5:0
7:00
6:00
8:00 T25 T23 Carl W She hit T16 lly Hu am ghe The s Art ists
he Ge nt lem en
mmy Yeah T25 Ki ging Knives T22 Sin quoia T15 Se
13:00 14:0 0
00 23:
24:00
1:00
12:00
T20 Stu art Mi t T13 Toll T18 chell ybo Pa T11 A m Kni y ndy Ha ve Col T10 Iron e gu s Anc e T7 M hor ick Sha L Plating T3 PM w quare Pegs T1 S
T6 Do sch
2:00
T2 T
00 11:
T T17 W 21 Mic kP alm ric ar T 1 2 M Produ e tland Electrical BR c T9 Por oof ts ing T8 Qu ality T5 Lynthorp Cab e inet r T4 RJS y
:00 10
3:0 0
0 4:0
9:0 0
:00 2 2
1 5 :00 :00 16 19:00 block E
block B
block F
block C
block G
18:00
20:0 0 block A
00 17:
2 1 :00 regular use
sporadic use
summer use only
storage use only
block D
USE OF PORTLAND WORKS: WEEKDAYS
Occupancy Mapping (Coloured by Block)
61.
0 5:0
6:00
7:00
8:00 9:0 0
0 0 : 4
T16 T
he A rtis ts
3:0 0
:00 10
T2 T
he Ge nt lem en
00 11:
T6 Do sch
2:00
T20 Stuart M itchel l Kn ives T11 A ndy C T10 Iron Anc ole hor
12:00
Pegs
mmy Yeah T25 Ki ging Knives T22 Sin quoia T15 Se
13:00 14:0 0
00 23:
24:00
1:00
T1 Square
:00 2 2
1 5 :00 :00 16 19:00 block E
block B
block F
block C
block G
18:00
20:0 0 block A
00 17:
2 1 :00 regular use
sporadic use
summer use only
storage use only
block D
USE OF PORTLAND WORKS: WEEKENDS
Retrofit Proposals
62.
phased, moving storage items to 32C /31C and vice versa if these cannot be relocated.
phased, moving storage items from 32C to 31C (or 33C) and vice versa if these cannot be relocated.
Walls
Floors
Ceiling/Roof
Windows
Doors
Ceiling/Roof
Windows
Doors
Draught Sealing
Walls
Floors
32C
33C
31C
34B-2
30D
phased, tenants moving to block C or D to alloow works to be carried out
34B-1
29D
temporarily relocate 21C tenant during works
relocate 20C tenants to 26E-2, 20C back to heavier use
21C
20C
22C
Draught Sealing
Second Floor
23B
Meter
phased: 18A items moved into 19D and vice-versa
23B 28G
26E-3 25E 19D 26E-2 24A
18A
27A 25-A 26A-1
First Floor
Retrofit Proposals
8C-1
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
14B-1 note: 14B-1 to 14B-3/Meter space changed to light-use units, storage items relocated
5C
17G-1
Doors
Windows
Ceiling/Roof
Walls
Draught Sealing
4C-2
Floors
63.
4C
17G-2
3D-2
14B-2
14B-3
14F-4 3D-1
Meter 15G-1 2D-1 9B 15G-2
16G
15G-3 10B
2D-2 10A 12E
WC
phased, moving storage items to 32C /31C and vice versa if these cannot be relocated.
Meter
11A
phased, moving storage items from 32C to 31C (or 33C) and vice versa if these cannot be relocated.
1A
13A w
32C
Draught Sealing
33C
Ground Floor
Doors
Windows
Ceiling/Roof
Floors
Walls
30D
Draught Sealing
34B-2
R
31C
phased, tenants moving to block C or D to alloow works to be carried out
Doors
Windows
Ceiling/Roof
Walls
Floors
Draught Sealing
34B-1
29D
Occupied Unknown
0D-1
Unused
Used as Storage
0A-1
0A-2
Basement
Portland Works Retrofit Proposals Second Floor
How to Use: Occupancy Mapping
64.
This drawing shows how the Works are used at different times by different tenants. It can be used to inform the planning of new, or shared spaces.
24 hr clock
Occupancy Mapping (Coloured by Tenant Type)
0 5:0
This shows that the tenant is typically only at the works during the start and end of the day.
6:00
7:00
8:00 9:0 0
0 4:0 3:0 0
:00 10
2:00
00 11:
1.
1:00
12:00
24:00
2.
13:00 14:0 0
00 23:
This shows that there are likely to be emply music and rehersal spaces during weekdays
42.
:00 22
15 :00
3.
:00 16
21 :00 19:00
20:0 0
sporadic use
18:00
regular use
00 17:
It is likely to be noisy after 6pm on weekdays. Additionally, events after 6pm are unlikely to disturb musicians
summer use only
storage use only
The type of line indicates regular, sporadic or seasonal use.
Tenant Code
Tenant Name
Tenant Type
T1
Square Pegs
Metalwork
Manufacture of bespoke patented coat hooks for schools
T2
The Gentlemen
Musician
Unlike other musicians at Portland Works, The Gentlemen are a full time band.
T3 T4
PML Plating RJS
T5
Lynthorpe
Metalwork Silver pla t ing Other craft/ Maintenance of Sheffield hallam Student manufacture/constr properties uction Other craft/ Manufacture of wooden double glazed sash Regularly work long hours. Work split between manufacturing at PW and manufacture/constr windows on site installation, however there is normally at least one person at the uction works. Lynthorpe have a long waiting list which means that their work is less sporadic than other manufacturers at PW.
T6
Dosch
T7 T8
Mick Shaw Quality Cabinetry
T9
Portland Electrical
T10
Iron Anchor
T11 T12
Andy Cole M B Roofing
T13
Tollyboy
T14
Portland Committee
Musician
Nature of Work
De s cript ion of Use Since the majority of work is carried out during school summer holidays Square Pegs work patterns are split seasonally . May - Oct are the busiest period. During summer will work long hours and weekends. During winter will work more regular 9-5 Mon - Fri Sporadic use of rehearsal space during the day, evening and weekend. More likely to use the space during evenings. Big in Norway where they will tour for long periods of time. St e a d y 8am -4pm. Rarely evenings and weekends Comes to the works for half an hour at the beginning and end of day.
"Rock and Roll, Rhythm and Blues". Play lots Use their space before and after gigs to load and unload equipment. Could of gigs in and around Sheffield be unloading late at night.
Metalwork Metal etching Steady 9:30 - 5:00. Might pop in on weekends. Other craft/ Bespoke Kitchen Fitter Completely self Length of time at PW varies depending on current workload. No Seasonal manufacture/constr sufficient. Workload varies. patterns. Not during weekends. uction Other craft/ Repair, rewind and supply of electric motors Steady 7:30 -4:30 Mon-Fri manufacture/constr uction Metalwork Iron gate manufacture. Motorbike repair. Sporadic . Will sometimes work in the evenings and sometimes on Saturdays. Metalwork Manufacture of metal tools. Steady 9 - 4. Will work Saturdays if there is work. Other craft/ Roofing and b uild ing Us e space as store. manufacture/constr uction Metalwork Manufacturing of high end, bespoke Sporadic 9 - 4. Will also spend long period in Australia chastity belts.
T15
Sequoia
T16
The Artists
Art
Other craft/ manufacture/constr uction Metalwork Grinding cutter blades for the lino-cutting trade.
T17
Walmar Products
T18
Pam Hague
T19 T20
Stuart Mitchell Knives
Musician
Metalwork
provide sound systems for Sheffield dub sporadic use during evening and weekends. events Studios for 5-6 artists who work at different Seasonal. Becomes too cold to work in winter. Art is a hobby alongside times. other permanent employment so will work sporadically for 2 -3 hours at a time throughout the week. Cabinet m a ke r 9 -4 mon -fri. Away for long periods.
Knife maker. Primarily hunting knives and the occasional sword.
T21
Mick Price
T22
Singing Knives
T23
Shelly Hughes
Art
Full time a rt is t
T24
Carl Whitam
Art
Photography. Specialises in industrial and architectural photographs.
T25
Kimmy Yeah
Musician
Band. Also have other work commitments
Works part time. 3 days a week 10-4.
Steady 10-4. Will come in occasionally on sat (around once a month)
Other craft/ Full time job elsewhere. Rarely at works. manufacture/constr uction Musician Record Label, project alongside other work weekends and evenings, once or twice a week. Occasional mornings. commitments. Group of five people who use the space a the same time. Spo ra d ic since she is sometimes an 'artist in residence' at other locations PW used for postproduction. Away photographing for periods of time (around two weeks) before returning to the works. Will work evenings. Lends space out for exhibitions since it is accessible from the street. Use space around two evenings a week, including weekends. Never during the day.
USE OF PORTLAND WORKS: WEEKDAYS
The colours in this version correspond to the tenant type (ie, artist, metalworker)
See also the diagram for weekends
This table gives a more detailed description of the tenants typical use of Portland Works
How to Use: Retrofit Proposals
65.
3. This drawing provides a clear overview of the retrofit measures proposed for each space in the works.
The diagram shows that the retrofit measures proposed and suitable for this space are draught sealing, windows and doors.
7C
5HWUR多W 3URSRVDOV
8C-1
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
14B-1 note: 14B-1 to 14B-3/Meter space changed to light-use units, storage items relocated
5C
17G-1
Doors
Walls
Floors
Windows
Draught Sealing
4C-2
Ceiling/Roof
63.
4C
17G-2
3D-2
14B-2
14B-3
14F-4 3D-1
Meter 15G-1 2D-1
15G-2
Doors
Windows
Ceiling/Roof
Floors
Walls
Draught Sealing
9B 16G
15G-3 10B
2D-2 10A 12E
WC
phased, moving storage items to 32C /31C and vice versa if these cannot be relocated.
Meter
11A
phased, moving storage items from 32C to 31C (or 33C) and vice versa if these cannot be relocated.
1A
13A w
This chart is used to show proposed retrofit measures. A bespoke chart has been created for each space in the works. As well as current occupancy, the measures proposed also take into consideration location, heritage and likely future use.
Doors
Windows
Walls
Floors
30D
Ceiling/Roof
34B-2
phased, tenants moving to block C or D to alloow works to be carried out
Doors
Windows
Walls
Floors
Ceiling/Roof
Draught Sealing
34B-1
29D
Occupied Unknown
0D-1
Unused
Used as Storage
0A-1
0A-2
Basement
0D-1
0A-1
1.
This key tells you which spaces in Portland Works are occupied.
Doors
Walls
Floors
Retrofit measures
31C
Draught Sealing
2.
Windows
Draught Sealing
Ground Floor
Ceiling/Roof
32C
33C
Portland Works Retrofit Proposals Second Floor
Proposals Diagram 1
66.
Portland Works Proposals Diagram #1
32C
33C
31C
This diagram suggests uses for the currently empty spaces, and indicates the spread of unit types across the works. 34B-2
These proposals do not involve re-locating tenants.
33C:
29D- 30D:
New designer / maker space One large space for a small company or individual with relatively light weight equipment, or small design company
30D
34B-1
29D
New start-up designer/maker spaces for jewellers, product designers, small-scale metalworks
Second Floor
HEAVY WORKSHOP (FORGING, WELDING etc) 21C
22C
20C
MID WORKSHOP (JOINERY, ASSEMBLY etc)
MID WORKSHOP DISPLAY/SHOP
23B
FABLAB / PUBLIC ACCESS
MUSICIANS Meter
ARTISTS / STUDIO SPACE 23B 28G
STORAGE 26E-3 25E
NEW SPACE BROUGHT INTO USE
19D
23B:
Maker space Small unit for maker (ie jeweller).
26E-2/3: 26A-1
New Studio Space Open plan, top-lit artists studio space likely to be occupied when adjoing making spaces empty
27A:
Maker space Open-plan unit for company such as squarepegs (joinery/metal work or other)
26E-2 24A
18A
27A 25-A 26A-1
First Floor
8C-1
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
14B-1
5C
17G-1
17G-2
3D-2
14B-2
14B-3
4C
14F-4 3D-1
Meter 15G-1 2D-1 9B 15G-2
16G
15G-3 10B
2D-2
14B1-3: Meter
1A
FabLab Public-accessible drop-in and digital making lab. Could incorp[orate desk-bnased working doubling as small exhibition/meeting room.
10A 12E
WC
Meter
1A 11A
13A
Carl Whitham Unit This currently functions as an exhibition and event space and is well-positioned for this.
Ground Floor
0A-1 / 0D-1:
Making Space / Digital production unit Open-plan unit for company such as squarepegs (joinery/metal work or other). OR Unit for digital cutting (ie CNC) facilities or publicly accessible workshop space linked to other businesses/Universities and spaces on G.Floor
0A-2
Basement
Relocation Proposals
67.
Portland Works Relocation be able to move into currently empty spaces with a minimum of disruption due to the nature of their business (typically musicians and artists with lighter/more portable equipment). This would allow the full refurbishment and upgrade of their current spaces without requiring tenants to leave the works. Tenants with large or heavy equipment (metal workers and joiners for example) would be very unlikley to be able to move temporarily without disruption to their business activities In many instances, these moves could be permanent as spaces are of a similar size and character.
1. 2.
1.
31, 32 and 33C Reduce then temporarily store items in Block D Refurbish.
2.
34B-1 and 34B-2 Relocate temporarily or permanently into 33C and 32C respectively Refurbish.
2.
Second Floor
HEAVY EQUIPMENT / DIFFICULT TO MOVE
EASY TO MOVE
VACANT SPACES
3. 2.
1.
6A-1, 27A, 26E-2 and 26E-3 Refurbish
2.
21C Kimmy Yeah move to 26E-3
3.
20C Artists move to 26E-2 and 26A-1
4.
28G Stuart Mitchell moves to 27A
4.
1. First Floor
1.
0A-1 and 0D-1 Refurbish
2.
14B-1,2 & 3 move items to 0A-1 / reloacte
3.
2D-2 The Gentlemen move to 0A-1 May be possible to refurbish/upgrade this space with tenant in-situ.
4.
0A-1 cleared for new tenant
3. Ground Floor
2.
1.
Basement
Heating Proposals
68.
Portland Works Space Heating Diagram
32C
33C
31C
This diagram shows potential centralised heating systems, large centralised systems. Wood chip or biomass system may still be suitable to serve woodworking areas where waste timber products (sawdust for example) might be useable on site for heating. It should be bourne in mind that should these tenants move out then the fuel source would need to be brought in from elsewhere.
B 34B-2
new combi boiler to 30D-1
30D
wood chip / biomass boiler radiator
B
34B-1
gas combi-boiler 29D
electric heater
Second Floor Block A 21C
22C
20C
Block B
Block C
Block D
23B
Block E
Meter
Block F
23B
28G
26E-3 25E 19D 26E-2
24A
18A B
27A
25-A 26A-1 new combi boiler to 26A-1 for 26A-1/26E-2, 26E-3, 27A
First Floor
8C-1
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
5C
17G-1
4C
17G-2
14B-1
14B-3
3D-2
B
14B-2 14F-4
3D-1 Meter 15G-1 2D-1 9B
15G-2
16G
15G-3 10B 2D-2 10A
12E WC
Meter
1A 11A
13A
Ground Floor 0D-1
0A-1
0A-2
Basement
4. Future Uses
FUTURE USES
This report aims to provide Portland Works with strategies not only for repairing and renovating the existing fabric, but also for creating a thriving hub of
Training
makers, artists and musicians. This can be through providing better spaces for existing tenants, but also encouraging positive new tenants to the Works,
The making element, in particular the metal trades
with new skills and ideas.
aspect, is key to Portland Works. Many of the tenants have specialised skills learned from older
Through discussion with the building manager
craftsmen, and are keen that this knowledge is
tenants and steering group members a number
maintained, or passed on.
of issues have been identified in terms of spaces required.
Schemes that allow training, or apprenticeships, and projects that bring in other makers and
There are currently no real spaces that are shared,
designers to collaborate, or learn at the Works can
other than the well-used courtyard and roof spaces.
both ensure the future vibrancy and collective
Unit 1A is currently used for open days and steering
nature of Portland Works continues and thrives.
group meetings by agreement with the tenant. It works well for this, since it is accessible from both the
Additional benefits of this are that these schemes
courtyard and pedestrian street entrance, is finished
may attract different types of funding that may
to a good standard, and has kitchen facilities and
make the further repair and renovation of parts
heating. Should this situation (or tenancy) change,
of the Works more feasible. They may also attract
a space with a similar combined use and easy
income streams that go some way to making the
access would be preferable.
Works as a whole self-sustaining with a diminishing need for grants.
There is also a requirement to be able to store materials related to the Works (drawings,
In the research section of this report, a number
documents) in a secure place on site, and a desire
of further funding schemes are identified, linking
to be able to display these (along with other visual
in particular to training, youth, community and
materials produced) in a an area accessible by the
heritage.
public. The Works should be able to generate an income from spaces that can be put towards the running of the site, and it is important that spaces are not created that sit empty for most of the time. The diagrams, produced as part of the mapping element of the report, start to identify possibilities for multi-, or shared-use spaces. An example of this might be an area that is used for meetings (in-house or bookable by the community) in the evenings, has display material on the walls and is open on weekends, and is used as hot-desking low-impact workspace, or the building manager by day.
71.
Fab-labs
In recent years the rise of digital design and small-
We have also included the basic physical
scale localised digital making (through laser-cutters,
requirements of typical pieces of equipment that
3-d printers and CNC cutting) has made it much
may be required (from desk-top 3-d printers, to
easier for individuals to produce high quality objects
large CNC cutting tables) both in terms of size, but
and one-off pieces in a variety of materials. Tests
also noise, dust and extraction (FabLab Equipment
and prototypes can also be created at low cost.
Survey). This information acts as a guide to locating equipment of this nature in Portland Works and
Fab(fabrication)Labs(laboratories) originated in the
can then be cross-referenced with details of empty
US and have spread around the world. The FabLab
spaces, or use patterns to build up a picture of
in Manchester, MAKLab in Glasgow and Sheffield’s
which locations could be most suitable.
ReFab Space (part of Access Space) are all set up to allow anyone to drop in and use the technology (which also includes hand-tools) to design, create and share. Some version of this model could suit Portland Works, and become an interface for public interaction with designers and makers based on site, as well as resource for tenants to use, with techniques and technologies that may compliment their own, allow for them to innovate, and strengthen the Works as a place of making. We have explored a number of scenarios that examine different models of access, benefits and knowledge exchange (FabLab strategies).
Fab-lab Strategies
72.
Fab-lab Equipment Survey
Portland Works Fab-lab
What is a Fab-Lab
Fab-Labs are generally equipped with computer operated equipment such as laser cutters, CNC routers and 3D printers. (This equipment is sometimes referred to a digital fabrication/ prototyping). Fab Labs provide a viable way for individuals or organisations to intermittently access this type of equipment. At Portland Works the remit of a Fab-Lab could be A ‘Fab-Lab’ or fabrication laboratory
is a small scale workshop that is available for anyone to use. with computer operated equipment such as laser cutters, CNC extendedFab-Labs to include are moregenerally traditionalequipped hand manurouters and 3D printers. (This equipment is sometimes referred to a digital fabrication/ prototypfacturing tools and crafts. Digital fabrication could ing). Fab Labs provide a viable way for individuals or organisations to intermittently access this be combined with the existing skills and manufactype of equipment. turing processes to create an extremely valuable
resource for the community and to continue a his-
At Portland works the remit of a Fab-Lab could be extended to include more traditional hand Digital fabrication could be combined with the existing skills and manufacturing processes to create an extremely valuable resource for the community and to a history of innovative manufacturing on the site. An onsitecontinue Fab-Lab could be central to establishing tory of innovative manufacturing on the site. manufacturing tools and crafts.
connections with the local community and open
(Images of Fab Lab Manchester)
An onsite Fab-Lab could be central to establishing connections with the local community and open up funding opportunities currently unavailable to Portland Works.
up funding opportunities currently unavailable to Portland Works.
? EXISTING MANUFACTURING AT PORTLAND WORKS
NEW MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
INNOVATION!
73.
Fab-lab Strategies
74.
Membership
£
£
£
di gi t fa al br ica tio n so cia ls pa c
to ol s
sp ac e
di gi t fa al br ica ti o n so cia ls pa ce
to ol s
sp ac e
e
Drop-In Access
£
PW
fab lab member
PW
£
PW
£
e di gi t fa al br ica tio n so cia ls pa c
wo rk
£
drop-in digital fabricator
to ol s
sh op
sp ac e
di gi t fa al br ica tio so n cia ls pa c
to ol s
sp ac e
e
drop-in maker
£
PW
informal peer to peer learning
Drop-In Access:
Membership:
Drop in access suites people who have knowledge about using machienery and are using the fab lab as a viable way of accessing workshop space and equipment. It provides one off access to the workshop for a fixed time and cost. The existing skills at Portland works and potential peer to peer learning may not be important for these users. Drop in sessions could be used to allow infrequent access to hand operated machines or digital fabrication.
For more frequent users a membership system might be more appropriate. As well as providing the ability to use the equipment more frequently a network of regular users could establish a peer to peer learning culture at the FabLab.
Existing Tenant Access gi t fa al br ica tio n so cia ls pa c
di
ol s
e ac
to
ls
PW
PW
open workshop access for PW tenant
local business membership
experimentation by PW tenant
gi t fa al br ica tio n so cia ls pa c
di
to
ol s
e sp
ac
di gi t fa al br ica tio n so cia ls pa c
s ol
ac
£
to
£
sp
£
e
e
e
local business drop-in
sp
di
sp
to o
ac
e
£
gi t fa al br ica tio n so cia ls pa c
e
e
Local Business Access
PW
Local Business Access:
Existing Tenant Access:
As well at targeting individuals the services provided as a fab lab could appeal to small businesses in Sheffield. The Wavelab precedent demonstrates how small start up businesses in Sheffield can benefit from access to fabrication facilities. Business access could be agrred on a drop-in or membership arrangement.
It is important not to neglect the benefit that a fab lab could bring to the existing tenants at Portland Works. It could provide workshop space and equipment that would otherwise not be viable for them to purchase. Digital fabrication could allow tenants to experiment with manufacturing processes that are unfamiliar to them and continue a culture of innovation.
Fab-lab Strategies
75.
Formal Teaching e di gi t fa a l br ic a tio n so cia ls pa c
to ol s
sp ac e
di gi t fa al br ic a tio n so cia ls pa c
to ol s
sp ac e
e
Collaborations
PW
tenant peer to peer learning
di gi t fa al br ica tio n so cia ls pa c
to ol s
sp ac e
e
di gi t fa al br ica tio n so cia ls pa c
to ol s
sp ac e
e
teaching by PW tenant
PW
tenant collaborations
PW
?
digital fabrication teaching
Tenant Collaborations:
Formal Teaching:
The fab lab could be used to continue peer to peer learning and collaborations between tenants at the works. This is already takes place informally and the provision of shared workshop space could only serve to encourage this. A fab lab could foster collaborations between artists and manufacturing at the works.
Alongside informal peer to peer learning and collaboration a fablab space could be used for slightly more formal teaching/ workshops. These could involve the tenants or invited guests with experience of digital fabrication.
Graduate Start-Up to
sp
ac
ol s
e
PW
£
£
£
Links with Universities:
Graduate Start Up:
Links could be made between universities and the fab lab. The diagrams in the previos section show how two course structures would benefit from this. This type of relationship could involve tenants to a greater or lesser degree.
A fab lab could be used to establish start up enterprises. These could work with university based graduate schemes. This type of activity and ambition could attract different sources of funding that have not been tapped into already.
pa
cia
so
gi t fa al br ica
tio n
graduate start-up
di
ls
£
di
ls
PW
£
to o
e ac sp
collaborations with university students
to o
sp
ac
e
£
gi t fa al br ica tio n so cia ls pa ce
£
ce
PW
access for university students
ls
£
di gi t fa al br ica tio n so cia ls pa c
e
Links with Universities
5. Funding and Research
FUNDING AND RESEARCH
Smaller scale monitoring and measuring
Funding
Research
opportunities may form part of on-going research, or teaching and should therefore be of no cost to the Works. A pilot project, with the University of Sheffield’s Engineering Faculty is already underway
We have drawn together information on funders
Portland Works offers a number of opportunities for
to test the fabric heat loss of brick walls at the
and schemes that may be relevant to Portland
research from the performance of historic building
Works.
Works in the Funding Opportunities schedule. Again
fabric to metal-working innovation and financial
these are also provided as a spread-sheet that can
models.
be accessed, added to, or altered by the group as required.
Funding Opportunities
Involvement in larger-scale programmes, again where buildings such as Portland Works are required
The Works already have a strong connection to the
to test issues around energy, waste and heat loss,
University of Sheffield, which has been beneficial to
will also bring similar benefits, although the nature of
both parties, and we have looked at areas where
the larger, often EU programmes requires long time-
research could be developed.
scales and may not fit as easily with Portland Works programmes.
There is currently a lack of data on the thermal Some of these awards have requirements which
and moisture performance of traditional (pre 1919
Research initiatives such as the TSB’s Innovation
suggest either technologies, or programmes that
solid-walled) buildings. With the increasing desire to
Vouchers, allow funding for organisations to work
should be part of the scheme should the applicant
retrofit old building stock to reduce levels of energy
with expert consultants on technical aspects of a
be successful – for example renewable energy
use come difficulties and unknowns.
project. This might be building or energy related,
technologies, or a community focus.
but could also look at aspect of manufacturing, or Older buildings are leakier, absorb and expel
materials (particular where this was of assistance to
Shifting the funding focus towards Arts and Youth
moisture, and are heavier weight, whereas modern
the Works as a whole) that may help the tenants.
Enterprise through concentrating on training and
construction materials are often vapour-closed.
digital technology also allows a wider range of
Thermal upgrade measures that do not take
There is also more social research, investigating
funders to be accessed, and these grants can
into account the particular properties of older
models of collaborative working, and how to link
potentially pay for equipment and building work.
buildings can cause damage to the fabric when
and strengthen small networks such as Portland
condensation forms within wall build-ups, or health
Works. Studio Polpo’s Future Mesters project is one
problems due to mould.
of these initiatives being submitted in early 2014.
In all cases, material elsewhere in this report may be useful in providing high-level feasibility (including
Initial data on research opportunities is included in
cost) information, and diagrams to support future
The thermal performance of different types of
bids with evidence of a how a plan sits within an
traditional construction has also been shown to
overall scheme, compliments other works on the
differ considerably from what has been assumed in
site, or achieves a particular aim. The Funding Bid
thermal modelling.
Diagram and Cold Spots Document Map both illustrate how the data produced can assist in
It would be of use to both academics and
planning for bids.
building professionals to collect data on how the
the Research Opportunities document.
Research Opportunities
building is performing now, and to monitor (and
Funding Bid Diagram
compare) how different repair and upgrade measures affect this. This would be of particular importance to Portland Works as results would allow the approaches to any upgrades to be tailored depending on the results, for example leading to a construction detail or insulation type to be altered in subsequent areas to work better.
79.
Funding Opportunities and Funding Bid Diagram
80.
FUNDING BID DIAGRAM Portland Works Funding Streams What is the amount available? Are there restrictions on what this will pay for? (i.e. not fees, only energy-saving works etc). What are the timescales/deadlines? Does the funding provide equipment? Does the funder allow simultaneous bids for other works?
Costs Bond Bryan Costs (current for 2013) (cost of repairs only but include contractors ohp)
Schedule of Works
Refurbishment Build-ups
What is being done to each space? How much can be done with tenants in-situ? Who will move? How far do you want to go with upgrade? What is required in terms of new fittings/partitions and stairs for example?
Different build-ups and refurb measures Selection depends on use of space Costed rate only- require areas to calculate cost Diagrams indicate ease of various measures Add % for contractors costs
Professional Fees
Can calculate based on typical rates for overall value of works or seek quotes
Planning Permission
Will be required for all works that are not a ‘straightforward repair’ fee based on value of work
vision planner diagrams to help decide
Building Control Fee Will be required for all works fee based on value of work
Phasing HPA vs LBC/Planning
Define what forms part of HPA Is there a smaller package of works in a separate LBC?
Heritage Partnership Agreement
Submit typical details and methods of repair and refurbishment Submit CMP Submit drawings and details of the works
Conservation Management Plan Identifies areas/elements of historic importance Needed to accompnay LBC or to form part of Heritage Partnership Agreement
NAME
DISTRIBUTOR
AMMOUNT
RELEVANCE TO P.W.
CONDITIONS
OTHER COMMENTS
TIMEFRAME
CONTACT
General Garfield Weston Biffa Small Grants Scheme
Biffa Award
£250 - £10,000.
Could be used for building improvements /additions that involve a community use, such as a new fab-lab facility. needs to be site based improvement work and not equipment costs, events or feasability studies. "Priority is given to those projects that can demonstrate an innovative use of a community amenity to enhance, maintain or introduce real community led social, economic or environmental improvements." (Biffa Award application form)
1. Demonstrate increased sustainability 2. Demonstrate need in the community 3. Total project cost must be £30,000 or less incl VAT (ie 25k) 4. someone else must contribute 5% of cost 5. 104+ days of puiblic access
PW would fall into the 'Community buildings' or 'cultural facilities' theme.
Rolling
http://www.biffa‐award.org/contact‐us
Could be used for building improvements /additions that involve a community use, such as a new fab-lab facility. needs to be site based improvement work and not equipment costs, events or feasability studies. "Priority is given to those projects that can demonstrate an innovative use of a community amenity to enhance, maintain or introduce real community led social, economic or environmental improvements." (Biffa Award application form)
1.Demonstrate increased sustainability
Biffa Main Grant
Biffa Award
£10,000 - £50,000
chare@rswt.org 01636 670083
Available to PW because it is within 10 miles of a biffa operation (Sheffield Transfer Station) and 10 miles of a landfill (parkwood springs). Inclusion of green technologies prefered
3. Demonstrate need in the community 4. Not purely fabric repairs/energy saving 5. Total cost not above £200,000 6. Someone else must contribute 20% of costs 7. 104+ days of puiblic access
PW would fall into the 'Community buildings' or 'cultural facilities' theme.
Rolling
Available to PW because it is within 10 miles of a biffa operation (Sheffield Transfer Station) and 10 miles of a landfill (parkwood springs). Inclusion of green technologies prefered
1. Project under £500,000 in total 2. Open to public for 104+ days 3. 5% of the total project cost secured before applying 4. Discrete start and end Suitable for a PW project that develops skills within the 1. If a building project, has to be no more than community. Could be used as an initial fab lab step, for £25k incl VAT (ie £20.8k) example the purchase of a small 3d printer. Unlike the 2. improved urban environments Biffa Award this could be used to purchace equipment 3. stronger communities and materials for a fab-lab, host an event or undertake feasability work.
Rolling basis, four rounds every 12 months
Veolia Environmental Trust
Normally £20,000 - £40,000 Maximum £100,000
Big Lottery- Awards for All
Big Lottery
£300-£10 000
AHF AHF English Herritage HLF HLF
£10,000-£50,000
Fab-Lab type activities could attract entrepenerial focused funding, but it could also be used to involve young people in herritage. This would open up funding such as the HLF young roots. PW could use modern fabrication processes to access and better under manufacturing heritage.
1. Engage young people, aged 11 to 25, with heritage 2.Increase access to and knowledge about herritage 3. Demonstrate that herritage will be in better codition or better explained/understood 4. Partnering with youth organisation
Rolling, can apply anytime
0 - £125,000
Grant for collaborations between arts aorganisations, technology providers and research. PW could be technology provider. Demonstrates broadened funding opportunities that could be created by a fab lab and collaborations.
1. Partner with arts organisation 2. Partner with researcher 3. Use digital technology to engage with art or develop new business models 4. Arts organisation led
Available Until 30 December 2013
0-£50,000
Currently PW would not qualify as it doen't have existing formal links with supporting young people. Shows that educational and start up facilities might bring additional sources of funding that are more specific than Big lottery, etc.
1. Existing links with young people 2. Experience supporting enterprise 3. Raise enterprise awareness 4. Support young people aged 13-30 to explore enterprise.
next round of funding opens 2nd Sept 2013.
£1000 - £100,000 over up to three yrs
Could be used to purchase more expensive equipment 1. need to provide at least 10% of total cost that other funding sources wont fund such as cnc or 2. Can include R&D, eqipment, organistaional laser cutter, if artists and art activities were inclued at development PW fab lab. Funding proposal could include a residency programme or digital fabrication research
Heritage Challenge Fund Cold Spots' Herritage Enterprise Young roots
Could be used for building improvements /additions that involve a community use, such as a new fab-lab facility. needs to be site based improvement work and not equipment costs, events or feasability studies.
Two relevant fund categories for PW: Category D - Public Amenities Category E - Restoration of Buildings of Historic Interest
Veolia Environmental Trust
01902 794677
0845 4 10 20 30
Enterprise/Fab Lab Innovation Vouchers
Technology Strategy Board Knowledge Transfer Partnership Digital Research and Development Fund Nesta, Arts Council England, AHRC for the Arts
RBS Inspiring Youth in Enterprise
Social Incubator North Arts Grants for the Arts
Research
RBS Group Inspiring Enterprise
0845 300 6200
Research Opportunities
25*$16$7,21
81.
$33/,&$7,21
)81',1* &267
1$785( 2) 5(6($5&+
%(1),7 WR 3:
%(1(),7 72 27+(56
7,0()5$0(
QRQH
6WXGHQWĆ&RXUVHZRUN ĆQRĆFRVW
,Q VLWXĆ8 YDOXHĆPHDVXUHPHQWV
DFFXUDWHĆWKHUPDOĆSHUIRUPDQFHĆGDWDĆRQĆVROLGĆ VWXGHQWĆOHDUQLQJ ĆODFNĆRIĆ $XWXPĆ EULFNĆZDOOVĆDOORZLQJĆPRUHĆUHDOLVWLFĆSUHGLFWLRQĆRIĆ PHDVXUHGĆ8 9DOXHVĆIRUĆEXLOGLQJVĆ WKHUPDOĆXSJUDGHĆPHDVXUHV RIĆWKLVĆW\SHĆQDWLRQDOO\
&217$&7
*HQHUDO
%XLOGLQJĆ)DEULF
8QLYHUVLW\ĆRIĆ6KHIILHOG Ć'HSW ĆRIĆ (QJLQHHULQJ
ĂďŝŐĂŝů͘ŚĂƚŚĂǁĂLJΛƐŚĞĨĨŝĞůĚ͘ĂĐ͘ƵŬ
8QLYHUVLW\ĆRIĆ6KHIILHOG Ć'HSW ĆRIĆ (QJLQHHULQJĆ Ć6VRD
&RVWĆRIĆ+\JURSWUDFNĆV\VWHPĆDSSUR[Ć Ć 5HPRWHĆVHQVLQJĆRIĆPRVLWXUHĆOHYHOVĆLQĆEULFNĆRUĆ ORRNĆWRĆFRYHUĆZLWKĆUHVHDUFKĆIXQGLQJ WLPEHUĆYLDĆ+\JURWUDFNĆV\VWHP
DFFXUDWHĆEXLOGLQJĆSHUIRUPDQFHĆGDWDĆRQĆIDEULFĆ ODFNĆRIĆPRLVWXUHĆGDWDĆRQĆUHWRUILWĆ SHUIRUPDFH ĆWHVWLQJĆPRLVWXUHĆLVVXHVĆLQĆLQVWDOOHGĆLQVXODWLRQĆLQĆEXLOGLQJVĆRIĆWKLVĆW\SHĆ LQVXODWLRQĆWRĆOHDUQĆIURPĆLQLWLDOĆLQVWDOODWLRQV QDWLRQDOO\
1DWLRQDOĆ,QQRYDWLRQĆ9RXFKHUV Ć0RGHUQĆ %XLOWĆ(QYLURQPHQWĆVWUDQGĆRIĆWKHĆ7HFKQRORJ\ 6WUDWHJ\Ć%RDUG
XSĆWRĆ ĆWRĆSD\ĆIRUĆVSHFLDOLVWĆDGYLFH
%XLOWĆ(QYLURQPHQWĆ (QHUJ\
6SHFLDOLVWĆ'HVLJQ 0RQLWRULQJĆDGYLFH
H[WHQGHGĆNQRZOHGJHĆEDVH
KWWSV FRQQHFW LQQRYDWHXN RUJ ZHE PRGHUQEXLOWNWQ LQQRYDWLRQ YRXFKHUV VFKHPH
(65&
1HWZRUNVĆRIĆ1HWZRUNV ĆVWUHQJWKHQLQJĆ PDQXIDFWXULQJ VPDOOĆPDNHUVĆLQĆ6KHIILHOG
,QFUHDVHGĆH[SRVXUH ĆLQYHVWLJDWLQJĆEXVLQHVVĆ PRGHOVĆDQGĆFROODERUDWLRQ
PRGHOVĆWRĆVWUHQJWKHQĆQHWZRUNVĆRIĆ 7%&Ć GHSHQGLQJĆRQĆVXFFHVV
VPDOOĆEXVLQHVVHV PDNHUV Ć LQFUHDVHGĆUHVLOLHQFH
6WXGLRĆ3ROSR
KWWSV YRXFKHUV LQQRYDWHXN RUJ EXLOW HQYLURQPHQW YRXFKHU
)DEULFDWLRQ )XWXUHV
8QLYHUVLW\ĆRIĆ6KHIILHOGĆ 6WXGLRĆ3ROSR
)XWXUHĆ0HVWHUV
$+5&
6. Conclusions
CONCLUSIONS
This report is primarily intended to provide material
The Proposals Diagram 1 uses occupancy data
to aid in decision making and future planning.
to suggest how spaces might be re-programmed
It provides accessible graphic information on
in the future, and the Relocation Proposals tie-in
tenancies, use patterns, repair priorities, and fabric
to this, indicating which tenants may be able to
upgrade potential, with figures allowing budgets
easily relocate (due to small amount of equipment,
and bids to be put together.
or under-utilised space). This relocation may be
At Portland Works change is constant;
permanent or temporary to allow for repair/retrofit
circumstances change; tenancies change,
works to take place.
regulations and approaches change, membership
It also points toward ways in which the creative
Responding to Change
of groups change. During the production of the
and skilled mix of tenants might be strengthened or enhanced by new public interfaces, workspaces or
The Heating Proposals look at how heating systems
Cold Spots report for example, some tenants have
tenants, and how the skills of the makers might be
might be sensibly introduced in a manner that
left, leaving large areas able to be repaired and
shared and passed on to a new generation.
allows overall control and maintenance by the
re-purposed, and this has implications on the
Building Management, suits the proposed use and
strategies and approaches applied.
A number of diagrams suggest courses of action
works with the fabric in the spaces in question. For this reason, many of the charts and graphics
based upon the data gathered. The following pages illustrate how a number of the
in this document can be edited and added to by
The Retrofit Proposals diagram suggests a realistic
diagrams within this report might be used together
others (and will be handed over as digital versions)
approach to upgrading the fabric of the building,
to inform a strategy for one part of the Works, and
to allow updates and alterations over time.
taking into account the ease of moving tenants,
how each can potentially inform the other.
working around heavy machinery and historic
We hope that we have made visible to many
importance of building fabric. For example, it
information previously known by only a few, and
would be very difficult to replace the floor, or
Cross Referencing Drawings
made accessible information that may have been
insulate the walls of the more heavy-duty ground
hard to find or impenetrable. This will, we hope,
floor workshops, but relatively easy to fill gaps and
allow a greater transparency in decision making, It should be noted that this report does not include
but allow the approaches to be discussed and
strategies for new layouts or subdivisions of existing
debated, in line with the vision put forward in the
This has then been cross-referenced with the Fabric
spaces and costs related to these (partitions,
Portland Works Business Plan
Build-ups and the Schedule of Areas to allow
lighting, power and fit-out) will need to be based on
budget costs to be produced for this work.
specific design work and quotes.
replace/repair doors and windows in these areas.
“ Portland Works will be a physically sound, fullyoccupied building owned and managed in a democratic way by its tenants and supporters. It
Schedule of Areas
will provide affordable workshops and studios for craftspeople and the creative industries and for small business start-ups. The management will be responsive to their needs, fostering opportunities for education and promotion of the heritage values of the Works, along with support for workplace training and apprenticeships. We envisage Portland Works playing an important role as the centre of a hub of similar developments in the neighbourhood of Little Sheffield and beyond.�
(Portland Works Business Plan, 2011)
85.
Cross Referencing Drawings to Make Informed Decisions: Upgrading the Building
Vision Plan Graphic 01
34B-1
Thie Bond Bryan information can be cross referenced with the heritage issues picked out in the conservation management plan
Checking this section of the Vision Plan Graphic shows the repairs required for Block C according to the Bond Bryan Report
2.
1. BLOCK C 8C-1
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
14B-1
5C
17G-1
17G-2
3D-2
14B-2
14B-3
4C
14F-4 3D-1
Meter 15G-1 2D-1 9B 15G-2
16G
15G-3 10B
2D-2 10A 12E
WC
Meter
1A 11A
13A
2
23B
34B-2
30D
87.
phased, tenants moving to block C or D to alloow works to be carried out
Significant Elements
Retrofit Proposals 26.
62.
phased, moving storage items to 32C /31C and vice versa if these cannot be relocated.
phased, moving storage items from 32C to 31C (or 33C) and vice versa if these cannot be relocated.
32C
Walls
Floors
Ceiling/Roof
Windows
Doors Doors
Draught Sealing
Walls
Floors
Windows
32C
33C
31C
Ceiling/Roof
33C
31C
34B-2
30D
34B-2
30D
phased, tenants moving to block C or D to alloow works to be carried out
29D 34B-1
34B-1 29D
29D
Second Floor
21C
22C
temporarily relocate 21C tenant during works
relocate 20C tenants to 26E-2, 20C back to heavier use
21C
20C
Draught Sealing
Second Floor
20C
22C
23B
23B
Meter
Meter
phased: 18A items moved into 19D and vice-versa
23B 28G
23B 28G
26E-3 25E 19D
26E-3
26E-2 24A
25E
Second Floor 19D
26E-2 24A
18A
18A
27A
First Floor
25-A 26A-1
27A 25-A 26A-1
21C
Draught Sealing
relocate 20C tenants to 26E-2, 20C back to heavier use
20C
3. The proposed retrofit measures are shown here. These proposals take in a number of consideration including heritage 23B significance, existing tenant and location.
Ceiling/Suspended Floor Insulation
CE.2
For rooms where the ceiling is being replaced
Internal Wall Insulation
IWI.1
Breathable, single system by one supplier, bonded to wall
External Roof Insulation
all penetrations, upstands and details as per manufacturer's instructions
ensure ceiling/floor void above insulated to avoid cold bridge and condensation issues, refer to NBT guidance
existing joists existing floorboards retained
ER.1
For flat solid roofs that need to be accessible
140mm Celotex TC3000/EL3000 rigid insulation bonded to finish below Firestone TPO roof membrane
existing 350mm solid brick wall with holes and gaps filled and mortar issues addressed by re-pointing with appropriate 8mmmortar. absorbent lime plaster lime 60mm Pavadentro woodfibre insulation board fixed to wall as per manufacturer's instructions 10mm NBT lime or clay plaster NOTE: insulation to return along internal walls as per NBT guidance. Window reveals to be lined with 40mm Pavadentro
20mm battens existing concrete deck (thickness assumed to be 150mm)
existing ceiling replaced with 15mm plasterboard 200mm Thermafleece T35sheepswool insulation on netting fixed to joists
Meter
vapour permeable membrane
4.
Detail: U-Value installed:
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
CE.2 0.18 W/m2K 0.18 W/m2K 0.35 W/m2K
£45.35 35mm reduced ceiling height
3
Detail: U-Value installed:
2
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
1
current
target
Notes: Disruptive to install but allows the room above to function un-interrupted. Provides thermal as well as increased acoustic separation. If opportunity arises to replace ceilings this is generally easier than lifting and replacing floorboards to the room above to install CE.1.
reduced
new
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
IWI.1 0.46 W/m2K 0.30 W/m2K 0.70 W/m2K
£86.11 80mm
vapour permeable membrane
3
2
Detail: U-Value installed:
ER.1 0.18 W/m2K
Cost/m2: Installed thickness:
£85.38 150mm
Target U-Value for this element: Reduced Value for Historic Bldg:
1
current
target
reduced
new
Notes: A robust system that is breathable. Relatively thick, also has benefits of thermal mass. Not suited to areas requiring a high number of wall fixings or where walls are likely to be subject to heavy knocks or harsh treatment.
The proposed retrofit measures can be cross referenced to relevant Fabric Build-Up details. These specify materials, suggest suppliers, give 28G environmental information and provide costs 26E-3
existing roof covering prepared to take insulation layer
skirting floor detail:ensure floor insulated where possible to avpid cold bridge and condensation issues, refer to NBT guidance
0.18 W/m2K 0.35 W/m2K
3
2
1
phased: 18A items moved into 19D and vice-versa
Notes: Some detail around rooflights/pipe penetrations need to be carefully resolved. Raises roof height which impacts stairs and doors.
current
target
reduced
new
Walls
First Floor
Cross Referencing Drawings to Make Informed Decisions: Introducing New Tenants
Vision Plan Graphic 02
Checking this section of Vision Plan Graphic 2 shows existing occupancy type
1.
BLOCK C 8C-1
8C-2
7C
6C
Meter
14B-1
5C
17G-1
17G-2
3D-2
14B-2
14B-3
4C
14F-4 3D-1
Meter 15G-1 2D-1 9B 15G-2
16G
15G-3 10B
2D-2 10A 12E
WC
Meter
1A 11A
13A
89.
18A
27A 25-A 26A-1
Knife Making Process
Use Patterns First Floor
2.
This diagram shows the historic, integrated knife making process at PW. It shows how the current spaces would have fitted unti this process. Understanding historic uses at PW could inform future ones.
3. The set of use pattern diagrams can be used to understand current activities - by block and tenant type - at PW. It can also be used to check impact of new ones.
+
?
Using the diagrams to inform future tenant types for different spaces
Key Recommendations
1.
The layout of the Works, and different
6.
Knowledge Management – recording
characteristics of the spaces, best tell the
lessons learnt, details of contractors, suppliers,
building’s history. Aligning the type of work that
works carried out and building issues in a manner
tenants do with the most suitable space in terms
accessible to those involved in Portland Works in the
of light, structure and location will allow the future
future.
interpretation of past activity, along with having practical benefits.
7.
Establishing an identity for the Works in
the city and beyond, but also on the street. What 2.
Where does ‘history’ or ‘heritage’ stop?
does the name Portland Works mean to people?
Value the patina and small traces that tell the
A building that was saved from becoming flats but
whole story of the Works and that are part of its
why and what is it now? What happens there? How
social and cultural heritage.
do people know?
3.
Portland Works is not a museum – helping
the tenants’ trade flourish is important. Getting the right mix is important, but also allowing spaces and mechanisms for them to collaborate and share skills and equipment, and to work with external partners is key. Made in Sheffield. Made in Portland Works. 4.
Establishing a framework and priorities
for repairs and future works, that does not require constant discussion with heritage consultants, and that can be understood and implemented by tenants and building management, is crucial. A Heritage Partnership Agreement may fit the bill. 5.
Establishing a mechanism for producing
information and guidelines for contractors, forms of agreement and contracts, and CDM/Health & Safety policy for the Works that can cover anything from small jobs and repairs to large scale contracts.
90.
Appendices
56.31 33.52 12.44
38.05 141.32 40.54 47.23 31.37 88.61 82.14 104.23 106.86 173.3 39.55 174.1 86.09 20.85 12.44 83.65
37.63 67.2 37 37 79.57 57.55 29.07
17G‐2 16G Stair
First 24‐A 25‐A 26A‐1 25E 26E‐3 26E‐2 27A 18A 19D 20C 21C 22C 23B Meter B Stair 28G
Second 29D 30D 31C 32C 33C 34B‐2 34B‐1
101 20 62.5 51.66 55.76 19.97
99.63 17.58 26.66
14.22 6.76 30.01 20.1 20.19 9.54 10.8 11.2 10.77 85.16 43.94 57.84 99.36 31.61 31.61 14 22.58 22.29 22.08 37.77 67.2 5.45 23.2 28.87 21.46 80.09
Floor area
WC slot 10A 10B 9B Meter 14B‐3 14B‐2 14B‐1 8C‐1 8C‐2 7C 6C 5C 4C 4C‐2 3D‐2 3D‐1 2D‐1 2D2‐2 14F‐4 15G‐3 15G‐1 15G‐2 Meter G 17G‐1
13A 12E 11A Meter
Ground 1A
Space Basement 0A‐2 0A‐1 0D‐1
external wall area is all walls in basement
numbers in red are assumptions
Floors total:
£23.35 £23.35 £23.35 £23.35 £23.35 £23.35 £23.35
£23.35 £23.35
CI.1 CI.1
CI.1 CI.1 CI.1 CI.1 CI.1 CI.1 CI.1
£23.35 £23.35 £23.35
CI.1 CI.1 CI.1
£43.70 £43.70
SFI.2 SFI.2
£23.35
£43.70
SFI.2
CI.1
£43.70 £43.70 £43.70 £43.70
£66.11 £66.11 £66.11
Rate
SFI.2 SFI.2 SFI.2 SFI.2
BT.1 BT.1 BT.1
Retrofit
Portland Works Retrofit Costs Table
Cost
£33,633.00
£878.66 £1,569.12 £863.95 £863.95 £1,857.96 £1,343.79 £678.78
£0.00
£0.00 £0.00 £946.61 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £1,917.97 £2,433.77 £2,495.18 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £2,010.20 £486.85
£0.00 £0.00
£0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £416.90 £471.96 £489.44 £470.65 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £1,650.55 £0.00 £0.00 £1,013.84 £1,261.62 £0.00 £0.00
£0.00
£0.00 £0.00 £0.00
£6,586.54 £1,162.21 £1,762.49
3 3 3
2.95 2.96 3 3 3 3 3.18
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.45 3.45 3.45 3 3 3 3.495
3 3 3.39 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.68 3.7 3.7 3.75 3.7 3.71 3.7 3 3 3 3.04 3 3 3 3 2.8 2.6 5.8 3.53 3.5 3
3 3 3.01 3 3 4.4
Wall height
80 34.4 17.39 17 35.89 21.36 32.47
9.4 14.35 9.1 13.51 11.98 5.53 21.05 47.5 56.17 50.56 9.4 50.77 54.18 18.41 8.7 42.73
17.95 11.4 11.4 4.25 5.2 5.2 9.34 27.56 7.8 13.8 24.37 7.6 27.19 12.48 14.47 9.8 9.8 17 40.08 10.27 9.7 8.3 9.45 5.3 5.6 15.4 11.45 2.38
5.2
48 21.25 22.19 20.47 20.9 7.2
17.63 47.81 20.18
Perimeter
220.00 81.41 52.17 51.00 107.67 64.08 103.25
28.20 43.05 22.20 40.53 19.94 16.59 49.09 142.50 168.51 174.43 32.43 175.16 162.54 55.23 26.10 149.34
60.85 34.20 34.20 12.75 15.60 15.60 28.02 101.42 28.86 51.06 91.39 28.12 100.87 46.18 43.41 29.40 29.40 51.68 120.24 30.81 29.10 24.90 26.46 13.78 32.48 54.36 40.08 7.14
15.60
144.00 63.75 66.79 61.41 62.70 31.68
52.89 143.43 60.54
Ext.Wall area
IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1
£86.11 £86.11 £86.11 £86.11 £86.11 £86.11 £86.11 £86.11 £86.11 £86.11
IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1
£86.11 £86.11 £86.11 £86.11 £86.11 £86.11 £86.11
£86.11
£86.11
£86.11
IWI.1 IWI.1
IWI.1
£86.11 £86.11
£86.11
IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1
IWI.1 IWI.1
£86.11 £86.11 £86.11 £86.11
£86.11
£101.49 £101.49 £101.49
IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1 IWI.1
IWI.1
BT.1 BT.1 BT.1
Retrofit Rate
Walls total:
£18,944.20 £7,010.56 £4,492.36 £4,391.61 £9,271.46 £5,517.93 £8,891.25
£12,859.78
£0.00 £0.00 £1,911.64 £0.00 £1,717.03 £1,428.56 £4,227.14 £12,270.68 £14,510.40 £15,020.34 £2,792.55 £15,082.73 £13,996.32 £4,755.86
£2,796.85 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
£2,505.80 £2,144.14 £0.00
£4,450.16 £0.00
£0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £1,097.90 £1,343.32 £1,343.32 £2,412.80 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
£0.00
£0.00 £0.00 £0.00
£5,489.51
£5,367.81 £14,556.71 £6,144.20
Cost
£12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50
£12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50
£12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £25.00 £12.50 £12.50 £25.00 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £25.00 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50
£12.50
£0.00 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50 £12.50
£25.00 £25.00 £25.00
Patching
£2,750.00 £1,017.68 £652.13 £637.50 £1,345.88 £801.00 £1,290.68
£352.50 £538.13 £277.50 £506.63 £249.25 £207.38 £613.63 £1,781.25 £2,106.38 £2,180.40 £405.38 £2,189.46 £2,031.75 £690.38 £326.25 £1,866.77
£760.63 £427.50 £427.50 £159.38 £195.00 £195.00 £350.25 £1,267.76 £721.50 £638.25 £1,142.34 £703.00 £1,260.94 £577.20 £542.63 £367.50 £367.50 £646.00 £1,503.00 128.375 £363.75 £311.25 £330.75 £344.50 £406.00 £679.53 £500.94 £89.25
£195.00
£0.00 £796.88 £834.90 £767.63 £783.75 £396.00
£1,322.25 £2,537.25 £2,537.25
£259,140.89
Cost
79.57 57.55 29.07
37.63 67.2 79
38.05 141.32 40.54 47.23 31.37 52.61 82.14 104.23 106.86 173.3 39.55 174.1 86.09 20.85 12.44 83.65
56.31 33.52 12.44
30.01 20.1 20.19 9.54 10.8 11.2 10.77 85.16 43.94 57.84 99.36 31.61 31.61 14 22.58 22.29 22.08 37.77 67.2 5.45 23.2 28.87 21.46 80.09
14.22
121 20 62.5 51.66 55.76 19.97
99.63 17.58 26.66
Ceiling area
PRI.1 PRI.1 PRI.3 PRI.3 PRI.3 PRI.3 PRI.3
PRI.3
ER.1 ER.1 ER.1 CI.2 CI.2
PRI.1 PRI.1 PRI.1
PRI.1 PRI.1
ER.1
CI.2 CI.2 CI.2
TOTAL
£1,123.63 £2,006.59 £9,294.35 £0.00 £9,361.41 £6,770.76 £3,420.09
£9,841.42
£3,675.18 £3,376.78 £7,432.33 £3,904.18 £945.55
£1,136.17 £4,219.82 £0.00 £1,410.29 £936.71 £1,570.93 £0.00 £0.00
£4,807.75
£1,052.12 £1,309.25 £973.21
£1,712.87 £5,040.00
£634.90
£432.64 £489.78 £507.92 £488.42
£905.64
£907.00 £2,834.38
£4,518.22 £797.25 £1,209.03
Cost
Ceilings total:
£29.86 £29.86 £117.65 £117.65 £117.65 £117.65 £117.65
£117.65
£85.38 £85.38 £85.38 £45.35 £45.35
£29.86 £29.86 £29.86
£29.86 £29.86
£85.38
£45.35 £45.35 £45.35
£45.35 £75.00
£45.35
CI.2
CI.2 MRI.1
£45.35 £45.35 £45.35 £45.35
£45.35
£45.35 £45.35
£45.35 £45.35 £45.35
CI.2 CI.2 CI.2 CI.2
CI.2
CI.2 CI.2
CI.2 CI.2 CI.2
Retrofit Rate Area
16 20.41
14.06
16
5.1
14 12 6 324 (total windo
10 13 14
3 24
5 8 3 6 10 0 10 16 19 10 3 29 20
3 3 3
0 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 2 3 3 1 4 0 2 2 3 4 4 2 1 0 2 5
5 3 3
15
10 3
No. windows £1,200.00 £1,200.00 0
£70.95 £70.95 £70.95
Tanking Rate
0 0 1
0 2
Tanking total:
17.63 47.81 20.18
Perimeter
0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 note: 50% of roof in JPG bid 1 note: roof in JPG bid 1 note: 50% of roof in JPG bid 2
2 2 0
0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 2 1 2 0 0 1 4 note: roof in JPG bid 1 1 1 1 4
0 3 1 2
1
1 1
Pump
1 1 1 59 (total windows)
No.Doors
£400,295.19 Classed as NEW BUILDING WORK under HLF
£99,046.57
£23,696.49 £11,603.95 £15,302.78 £5,893.06 £21,836.71 £14,433.48 £14,280.81
£1,488.67 £4,757.94 £3,135.75 £1,916.91 £2,902.99 £3,206.87 £6,758.73 £16,485.70 £19,111.95 £20,875.92 £6,574.70 £24,704.51 £21,942.45 £6,878.63 £326.25 £24,567.97
£0.00 £7,193.39 £3,669.27 £767.63 £783.75 £1,301.64 £0.00 £195.00 £0.00 £760.63 £427.50 £427.50 £2,106.81 £2,500.06 £2,535.68 £3,722.12 £1,267.76 £721.50 £638.25 £1,142.34 £703.00 £1,260.94 £1,212.10 £542.63 £367.50 £367.50 £8,459.58 £6,543.00 £128.38 £4,935.51 £5,026.26 £1,303.96 £344.50 £3,202.85 £5,487.27 £500.94 £89.25
£17,794.82 £19,053.43 £11,652.98
Total Costs
£8,474.74
£1,250.85 £3,392.12 £1,431.77
Cost
Partitons Rate
Shedule of Areas 93.
Funding and Costing Examples
Ground Floor Plan
WORKS Funding PORTLAND Bid Example: JP Getty Funding Bid 2013 JP Getty
Basement Floor Plan
C Areas of roof, chimney & rainwater goods repair
A number of sources of data contained in this
D
report were used to help to put together the
B
funding application to JP Getty. The priority of
Areas of roof, chimney, rainwater goods repair and insulation
G
F
works is highlighted in the Vision Plan Graphic 1; the graphic indicating the need to prioritise roof
E
related work to most blocks. From this, and the
A
Bond Bryan survey, costs for these repair items can be assembled.
First Floor Plan
Roof Plan with Block letters
Opportunistic upgrades (such as insulation as a part of roof repairs) have then also been added, with costs and specifications drawn from the
Schedule of Work
Fabric Build-Ups and Build-up costs to put together
Portland Works
the funding application to JP Getty. The cost
JP Getty Funding Application July 2013
breakdown for the application (for works of up to
Building Area Block A
£250,000.00) is shown on this page.
Building Costs Description of Work Renew roof covering (re‐using existing slates), including £49,250.00 ridge tiles, verge pointing and chimney flashings
Block sub‐total
Isolated structural erepairs including work to some wall £5,000.00 plates and rafters
Despite this application being made prior to all of the data in the report having been compiled, basic rates, approaches and costs were able to
Renewal/replacement of timber eaves gutter to front elevation, cast iron and plastic rainwater goods elsewhere and timber dentils.
£12,000.00
Repoint five chimney stacks, rebed four flue terminals
£6,000.00
be put together fairly rapidly, and different options
Rebuild one chimney stack
£2,000.00
analysed.
Scaffolding
£4,892.44
Rebed ridge tiles, overhaul roof covering, refix loose slates.
£3,000.00
Check and remedy damp ingress at boundary with adjacent building.
£500.00
Renew timber gutters and replace gutter supports.
£2,000.00
Scaffolding
£2,087.76
Ground Floor Plan
Second Floor Plan
Block B
Costing Example: Block A vs Block D
£79,142.44
£7,587.76 Block C
Basement Floor Plan
The data in this report was also used to examine the relative costs of repairing upgrading Areas of roof,and chimney & rainwater the goods repair first areas of Blocks A & E with those of Block D.
Areas of roof, chimney, rainwater goods repair and insulation
Both of these areas (shown on the diagram) are
currently empty. The data can be compared with
£26,700.00
Insulate above existing roof covering with rigid insulation and new TPO roof covering.
£22,164.65
Renew pitched roof coverings (re‐using slates), including ridge tiles, verge pointing and chimney flashings.
£20,000.00
Renew all rainwater goods.
£6,600.00
Scaffolding
£3,845.22 £79,309.87
Block D
relative rental gain in bringing these areas back into re-use to help make a decision, however in this
Patch repair asphalt roof including upstands to balustrade, renew all three rooflights.
Renew lead flashing to ridge, rebed copings to gable elevations and repoint.
£700.00
Scaffolding
£2,415.60 £3,115.60
Block E
Replace corrugated steel roof section with new insulated slate roof
£9,059.05
require a new external access stair distorts the costs
Replace flat asphalt roof covering with new rigid insulation and TPO membrane
£3,756.72
somewhat.
Renew slate roof covering (re‐use slates) including ridge tiles, verge pointing and chimney flashings.
case, the fact that the top floor of Block D would
£10,746.00
One interesting point is that the greater external wall area to floor area ratio of Block D, together with the much larger amount of windows makes this
Scaffolding
£1,846.69
Replace corrugated metal roof with new Kingspan insulated metal roof.
£7,425.00
£25,408.46 Block F
generally more costly per m2.
Renew all rainwater goods and downpipes.
£2,000.00
It should be noted that factors such as contractor’s
Scaffolding
£954.00
& consultant’s costs, site costs and the planning
£10,379.00 Block G
and listed building process (and fees) have been taken into account in both applications, but
Renew roof covering of main duo‐pitched roof, re‐using £13,000.00 slates and clay ridge tiles. Renew all rainwater goods
£5,300.00
Scaffold
£2,415.00 £20,715.00
guidance on allowing for these does not form part of this report. In Block D, for example, the works would also involve Planning & Listed Building consent, and the increased cost and timescale of this is not picked
£385.00 £1,040.00 £22,340.15 sub‐total
£23,765.15
TOTAL
£249,423.28
up in the straight cost comparison. Again, this exercise was carried out during the creation of the Cold Spots report, with emerging cost data and areas.
£225,658.13
sub‐total Planning Listed Building Consent Fee Building Control Fees Consultants Fees
NOTES:
All costs include an allowance for contractors overheads and profits Costs based on Bond Bryan condition survey with budget costs 2011, cost checked by Richard Fletcher Associates (QS) 2013, and QS costed rates for new insulation and associated works based on Studio Polpo (architects) details 2013 All costs exclude VAT, PW is VAT registered Professional fees based on the following %'s of build cost: Architect 6.5%, QS 2.2%, CDMC 0.4%, Str.Engineer 1.9% and reduced to 90% as there is no feasibility stage.
94.
Fab-lab Equipment Survey
95.
Laser Cutter - A4 Desktop
Laser Cutter - A1
Description:
Description:
Laser cutters can be used to cut and engrave a wide variety of material including thin plywood, mdf and Perspex. The maximum material sheet size that can be cut depends on the size of the laser cutter bed. This ranges from a4 to a1+. In addition to the laser cutting machine extract pipes and ventilation pumps are required to remove smoke from the machine.
Laser cutters can be used to cut and engrave a wide variety of material including thin plywood, mdf and Perspex. The maximum material sheet size that can be cut depends on the size of the laser cutter bed. This ranges from a4 to a1+. In addition to the laser cutting machine extract pipes and ventilation pumps are required to remove smoke.
Â
The laser cutter shown on this factsheet is the Epilog Legend 36EXT. This model was used to make the Portland Works model.
The laser cutter shown on this factsheet is the HPC Laser LS3020 pro
Fab-Lab Equipment Factsheet_02
Fab-Lab Equipment Factsheet_01
 �    � �
Space Required:
Â? Â Â? Â
Space Required:
2. 2. 1.
3.
1.
2.
1. 3.
5.
4.
4. 3.
Scale 1:20 1. Makerbot Replicator 2 2. Space for Material Spool 3. Desk 4. Space to sit infront of machine
Scale 1:20 1. A4 Laser Cutter 2. Desk 3. Space for operating machine
Scale 1:20
Scale 1:20
1. A1 Laser Cutter 2. Desk for computer input 3. Space for sitting at computer 4. Space to load machine 5. Space for extractor pumps
1. Powder 3D printer 2. Desk for computer and 3. Space for operating co
3D Printer - Small Desktop
3D Printer - Powder
Description:
Description:
There is a large variety of 3D printers available. These can vary in size from a small desktop printer to a large machine requiring a whole room. There are also different technologies available. The simplest 3d printers, such as the one shown on this factsheet, construct objects by melting and layering up plastic material. No extract is required.
More sophisticated and larger 3D printer machines are powder based. These can make more detailed and complicated designs. The 3D printer shown here is restricted to white models, but some powder based machines can print in full multicolour. The 3D printer shown on this factsheet is the zprinter 350
Fab-Lab Equipment Factsheet_04
Fab-Lab Equipment Factsheet_03
The 3D printer shown on this factsheet is the Makerbot Replicator 2.
Space Required:
2.
2. 2.
1.
3.
Space Required:
2.
2.
1.
3.
1.
3. 4.
1.
1.
3.
5.
1.
5.
4.
4.
Scale 1:20
Scale 1:20
1. Makerbot Replicator 2 2. Space for Material Spool 3. Desk 4. Space to sit infront of machine
1. Makerbot Replicator 2 2. Space for Material Spool 3. Desk 4. Space to sit infront of machine Scale 1:20 1. A1 Laser Cutter 2. Desk for computer input 3. Space for sitting at computer 4. Space to load machine 5. Space for extractor pumps
3.
4.
3.
Scale 1:20
Scale 1:20
1. A1 Laser Cutter 2. Desk for computer input 3. Space for sitting at computer 4. Space to load machine 5. Space for extractor pumps
1. Powder 3D printer 1. Powder 3D printer 2. Desk for computer and ďŹ nished models 2. Desk for computer and ďŹ nished models 3. Space for operating computer and machine 3. Space for operating computer and machine
Scale 1:20
2.
Fab-lab Equipment Survey
96.
CNC Machine Description: CNC machines combines the cutting power of drills and routers with the accuracy of computer control. They can be used to cut much thicker material than laser cutters and tend to have a much larger cutting bed. They create a dusty and noisy space and require an extract. Since they are used to fabricate large furniture etc, space for material storage and product assembling needs to be considered.
A4 Laser Cutter A1 Laser Cutter
Fab-Lab Equipment Factsheet_05
The CNC machine shown here is the one installed at Wavelab in CADs
Desktop 3D printer
Space Required:
1.
2.
5.
4.
3.
CNC Machine
All Scale 1:50 Scale 1:50 1. CNC Machine 2. Desk for computer input 3. Storage for Parts 4. Space for operating machine and computer 5. Space for material storage and assembly
Powder 3D printer
Produced by Studio Polpo www.studiopolpo.com office@studiopolpo.com