TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 YOUR NO. 1 SOURCE FOR NEWS, SPORTS, WEATHER AND ENTERTAINMENT
THENOWNEWSPAPER.COM
FOLLOW US ON TWITTER @THENOWNEWSPAPER
Become a IC MECHAN .2230 Call today 604.635
S U R R E Y - N O R T H D E LTA E D I T I O N
21
a
.c www.lovecars
Automotive Training Centre since 1985 Ask us about S STUDENT LOAN
091713
FOOTBALL: After three years in the Tier 2 wilderness, the Frank Hurt Hornets have rejoined the AA ranks
be year you can . In under one orking w d an ey rr trained in Su ” “tell a friend
Surrey
Surrey
Waste not, pay not?
School’s reversal on split classes sparks protest
Surrey woman says she shouldn’t have to pay for trash she doesn’t put out
District says notices claiming school would run small classes was a mistake
EMAIL US WITH
Christopher Poon Now staff Twitter @questionchris
Now contributor Twitter @jacobzinn
NEWTON — One environmentally conscious family is disputing the City of Surrey’s garbage collection rates for homes with secondary suites, saying the fees don’t reflect the usage for homes that produce less waste. Over the last six months, Jennifer Holloway has had a back-and-forth with the city over its secondary suite garbage collection fee. It started when the Holloways received a letter from the city noting that they would be charged $141 per year for increased waste services on top of the standard garbage rate of $281 for homes without suites. That $141 entitles the Holloways to an optional upgrade to a 360-litre garbage bin, but Holloway said they don’t want one – they are avid recyclers and composters, and they hardly fill their current 240-litre bin halfway every two weeks. So if they don’t produce more waste, why are they shelling out $141 annually for more waste services? “We’re asking, ‘What are we paying for?’” said Holloway. “For no service being provided, they expect home owners to just hand over money to them. We have a little bit of an issue with that.” see TRASH DISPUTE › page 3
A frustrated Jennifer Holloway is disputing the City of Surrey’s higher garbage collection fees for homes with secondary suites, saying the city is charging her for a service that she just doesn’t use. (Photo: JACOB ZINN)
WHALLEY — Parents of students at Surrey Traditional School are crying false advertising after their school began operating split classes last week, despite being told it wouldn’t. According to parents who protested outside of the district’s offices Thursday, Surrey Traditional has long been described as a school that offers no split division classes as well as modest class sizes with no more than 20 students per class. They say the school has operated as such for years, a claim they feel is backed up by the district’s own description of the school as posted online and in newsletters. However, when two teachers were cut earlier this month after the first week of school and two split classes formed, parents are wondering why the district seems to suddenly be changing its stance. The language in question read: “At our school there are no ‘split’, ‘blended’ or ‘combined’ divisions. There are two classes per intermediate grades (4 – 7). Our kindergarten and grade one and three levels currently have three classes and all our primary grade levels will be expanded to three classes in coming years and be capped at a maximum of 20 students in each class.” see POSTING › page 3
091713
Jacob Zinn