AgeofDrSubramanianSwamy

THE AGE OF DR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY HAS BEGUN V. SUNDARAM I.A.S

DR.SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY The famous Hindi poet Ramdhari Singh Dinakar once exclaimed in exasperation: “Singhasan Khaali Karo Ke Janata Aaati Hai”. These soul stirring words in Hindi were mobilized by the great revolutionary freedom fighter Jayprakash Narain when he led the myriad millions of India against the draconian dictatorship of Indira Gandhi during the dark days of Emergency during 1975-1977. Jayprakash Narain won the democratic war against Indira Gandhi in 1977. During that period there was another revolutionary leader who was very young and who taught a salutary political lesson to Indira Gandhi. He displayed extraordinary courage against that singularly unscrupulous Congress leader Indira Gandhi, playing a singularly magnificent role in bringing her down from her high office in April 1977. After nearly 33 years, Dr Subramanian Swamy has again made history this morning (18-November 2010) in the Supreme Court of India.

Two years ago Dr Subramanian Swamy exposed the Himalayan corruption of DMK Party nominated Union Telecom Minister A. Raja in the 2g spectrum allocation scam by furnishing irrefutable documentary evidence to the Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh and sought the latter’s permission as prescribed under the rules to prosecute Minister A. Raja. The Prime Minister sat over this letter like an obdurate low level baboo and took no action on Dr Swamy’s letter. Subsequently Dr Swamy sent several letters reminding the Prime Minister about the Paramount Public Need for according sanction to prosecute Minister A. Raja. On each occasion Dr Swamy furnished newer and more and more unassailable documentary evidence to establish a prima facie case against the criminal misconduct of Minister A. Raja.

Only on two occasions, Dr Swamy received a letter from the Government during the last two years. After a lapse of more than one year, the Prime Minister sent a

1

letter to Dr Swamy stating that the matter was being referred to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Was it really the CBI or has it now become Congress Bureau of Intimidation? We have a saying in the government that no rumour is true until the government denies it and the Prime Minister has denied in public several times (in order to please his extra-Constitutional Italian colonial overlord) that the CBI is the Congress Bureau of Investigation!!! In the case of A. Raja’s spectrum fraud case alone, until the Supreme Court recently directed them to function in a clean manner, the CBI was functioning as SBI (Sonia Bureau of Intimidation)!!! My way of joking is to tell the truth! I derive my inspiration from the following lines of a great English poet: “How happy is he born and taught, That serveth not another’s will; Whose armour is his honest thought, And SIMPLE TRUTH his utmost skill.”

The second letter sent to Dr Swamy was from Union Minister Raja and that too after several months of inordinate delay. The joke about this letter is that Union Minister Raja had stated that the Prime Minister had chosen to forward to him the original letter of Dr Swamy seeking Prime Minister’s permission to prosecute Union Minister Raja! How could the Prime Minister forward Dr Swamy’s original letter addressed to him to the accused Minister Raja? That is why I say that the lawless law of the Firangi Memsahib overrides the Law of the Constitution!!

The Solicitor General of India Gopal Subramaniam --- nay the SABOTEUR GENERAL OF INDIA --- incorrectly informed the Supreme Court that the Prime Minister’s office had promptly sent reply letters in respect of every letter received by them from Dr Subramanian Swamy.

Dr Subramanian Swamy exposed the walkie-talkie fraud of Gopal Subramaniam when he told the open Court that Gopal Subramaniam was treating routine acknowledgement letters sent by the Prime Ministers Office (PMO) to him from time to time as documents of high state policy. Dr Subramanian Swamy had told the Court that these routine interim letters had not at all touched upon the substantive issue raised by him in his original letter to the Prime Minister.

To sum up, Dr Subramanian Swamy also invited the attention of the Supreme Court of India to the following points: A. There was an astounding 11-month “silence” of the Prime Minister on Dr Swamy's public interest litigation seeking sanction to initiate proceedings against then Telecom Minister A. Raja over the 2G spectrum allocation.

B. Dr Swamy told the Supreme Court: “I am suggesting that Solicitor General is either embroidering or stretching the truth. He is taking even routine letters of acknowledgment of mail as substantive official replies”! Dr Swamy has dismissed as “lie” the claim by Solicitor-General Gopal Subramanium that Dr Manmohan Singh had replied to all the letters of Dr Swamy seeking sanction for prosecution against then Telecom Minister A Raja in the 2G spectrum scam.

C. Dr Swamy informed the Supreme Court that he had never received any “substantive” reply since Nov 29, 2008from the Prime Minister to his five letters, sent from time to time and on each occasion fortified with additional documents attached by way of clinching evidence against Raja.

2

D. Another communication was a letter from A. Raja, who resigned as communications and IT minister recently, addressed to Dr Swamy in December 2009. It stated that a copy of the representation that Dr Swamy had given to the Prime Minister seeking the prosecution of Minister Raja had been forwarded to him. Dr Swamy pointed out to the Supreme Court that this was “illegal”. How could Minister Raja be directed to reply when he figured as the prime accused in the original representation of Dr Swamy to the Prime Minister?

E. The Supreme Court of India has taken an exception to the 11-month “silence” of the Prime Minister on Dr Swamy's public interest litigation seeking sanction to initiate proceedings against then telecom minister A. Raja over the 2G spectrum allocation. The Supreme Court of India directed the Solicitor General to file a written affidavit on behalf of the Prime Minister in the Supreme Court on Saturday the 20 th of November 2010. The Supreme Court is also reported to have observed: “We are asking for the PM’s affidavit because we want to know what has been the extent of the cover up in this case in the PM’s Office.”

The Italian woman ‘political’ dacoit Sonia Gandhi --- modelling herself like the highly corrupt President of Peru, Alberto Fujimori --- who is now the undisputed dictator of the Congress and through it the entire Indian nation has tried her best to black out from the media --- both print and electronic --- all the vital news relating to the legal and legitimate political battles of Dr Subramanian Swamy, being launched from time to time, in several Courts of Law with focus on the larger national good.

The otherwise supine and eminently purchasable Indian press is now scenting an epic political battle today, very much like the one waged in 1979 between Jayprakash Narain and the Congress (Hitler-like) dictator Indira Gandhi. That is why we are now seeing Dr Subramanian Swamy on all TV news channels round the clock. Like a pack of wolves’ scenting the blood of an injured prey and going after it with gusto, the Indian press is now going after the acts of high criminal venality of the foreign female political thug, firangi dakait Sonia Gandhi. Though these cowardly men and women in the media do not have the guts to state this fact explicitly in their broadcast, yet all the enlightened citizens of India understand it fully.

When a thing is well understood by the common people, it need not necessarily be underlined.

This morning, Friday 19-November-2010, the Prime Ministers Office has announced that Goolam Essaji Vahanvati, the Attorney General of India will now appear on behalf of the Prime Minister in the place of Gopal Subramaniam, the Solicitor General of India, in the on going case relating to A. Raja in the Supreme Court.

In these columns I have already paid my profound tributes to Gopal Subramaniam as The Saboteur General of India! The antecedents of Goolam Essaji Vahanvati are no better than those of Gopal Subramaniam. The Janata Party President Dr Subramaniam Swamy has stated today (Friday 19-November 2010): “I have no objection if Vahanvati defends the Prime Minister. But if he comes for the 2G case, then I have a problem”.

I know what Dr Subramanian Swamy has in mind. On December 26, 2007, the then Union Telecom Minister A. Raja had written to the Prime Minister to this effect: “I have already consulted the External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee and Solicitor General of India G.E Vahanavati and they have advised me as a preemptive and proactive measure I can go ahead with the allocation of 2g Spectrum space immediately.” Having played an advisory part in this sordid scam, The most

3

honourable course would be for G.E Vahanavati to recuse himself from talking in the Supreme Court on 2G Spectrum and the murky role of A. Raja.

Moreover, when a company called S Tel moved the Delhi High Court early in 2009, to set aside the arbitrary and criminal cut-off date of September 25, 2007 fixed by Union Minister A. Raja, the Delhi High Court gave a ruling in favour of S Tel and set aside the cut off date of September 25, 2007 in their orders passed in June 2009. In this case G.E Vahanavati had appeared on behalf of Department of Telecommunications (DOT) in his capacity as Attorney General of India. He had mislead the Delhi High Court by falsely stating in his affidavit that the Prime Minister had given his clearance to A. Raja in respect of every issue that was being raised by S Tel in the Delhi High Court.

He had also kept the fact of the Prime Minister having instructed the Union Minister Raja to proceed cautiously in a matter after duly consulting the Union Ministries of Law and Finance, completely hidden from the view of the Delhi High Court.

Later when the DOT moved the Supreme Court on appeal against the orders of the Delhi High Court in favour of S Tel, G.E Vahanavati played a questionable role behind the scenes in making S Tel withdrawing their affidavit in the matter. I had written on this aspect of G.E Vahanavati’s nefarious role in an article titled ‘Maharajadiraja Dalit Raja Spectrum Fraud Outshines And Outclasses (Asatyam) Raju Satyam Fraud-III’ and published on May 29, 2010. I am quoting some excerpts from this article relating to the probity of G.E Vahanavati.

“On 10-March-2010 Attorney General Goolam E Vahanvati produced a letter from STel in the Supreme Court in which the telecom operator sought to buy peace with the Department of Telecommunications by saying they agreed to DoT policy on allotment of 2G spectrum.

“In these circumstances, we acknowledge the fact that our application has not been rejected and are now agreeable to the government considering our applications at the appropriate time. We acknowledge the fact that the decision of the government for giving UASL (unified access service licence) to those who applied up to September 25, 2007 was not arbitrary but based on likely availability of spectrum and administrative decision thereon,” Vahanvati said, reading aloud S Tel's communication.”

“Based on STel’s letter, the Communications Ministry wanted to withdraw its own appeal against the Delhi High Court judgment, but the Supreme Court did not allow the plea. THE ANNOYED BENCH ASKED WHY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL G.E VAHANVATI WAS SUBMITTING A LETTER FROM S-TEL ON THEIR BEHALF?” “My Comment: G.E Vahanvati, appointed to the Constitutional post of Attorney General, is the Indian Government's chief legal advisor and its primary lawyer in the Supreme Court of India. I am shocked to see that he allowed himself to be seen discharging the function of an advocate of a private company like S-Tel to cover up the shady deal of Dalit Minister Raja. A disgraceful situation indeed!

In UPA II Government he proved to be more powerful than the Central Vigilance Commission which had recommended the prosecution of Union Minister Dalit Raja in the matter of allotment of Spectrum G bandwidth.”

Exemplary and outstanding credentials indeed! The real truth is this irresponsible Attorney General stands for the privatization and commercialization of the exalted public office of the Attorney General of India! I am shocked to see that the office of the Prime Minister has chosen G.E Vahanavati to defend the Prime Minister in the Supreme Court in the 2g Spectrum fraud case.

4

Yesterday on Times Now TV Channel, Manish Tiwari, official spokesman for the Sonia Congress Party said that Dr Swamy should have first lodged a complaint with a Magistrate for holding an inquiry before approaching the Prime Minister of India for according sanction for the prosecution of the then Union Telecom Minister A. Raja in the 2g spectrum fraud case. Dr Swamy has put this question to this pageboy of the Italian firangi Memsahib: “Why SC judges did not say so? Who is this Congress spokesperson who says so? No one has so far told me why I have come here straight without first lodging complaint with the magistrate. Those who do not know law would say so. Why should I complain to magistrate... I have completed all my investigations. I do not need it. I have everything (details of the case). Congress will do better if it removes Manish Tiwari from the post of spokesperson. I have the right to go to magistrate or a sessions judge for lodging a complaint and ask for issuing summons to Raja.”

I would only supplement Dr Swamy’s correct, wholly legal, appropriate and pointed observations by saying that Manish Tiwari’s 24X7 arajgari (a Sonia Congress Anarchist) consists in shamelessly declaring with secular anti-national fervour that the LAWLESS MAFIA LAW of the Extra-Constitutional Authority of the Italian Firangi Memsahib (which has the disastrous effect of reducing the highest Constitutional status of the Prime Minister of India to that of a Tenant-at-will of an Italian female mafia don) overrides the Law of the Indian Constitution.

Manish Tiwari’s daily prayer for wholesome and soul-elevating Sonia Congress servility seems to be this, today: “Lead us from Mahatma Gandhi to Sonia Gandhi, From Guru Gobind Singh to Dr Manmohan Singh, From Rajaji to Karunanidhi, From Manliness to Unmanliness, From Communal Chastity to Secular Prostitution, From Truth to Untruth, From Democracy to Dictatorship, From Courage to Cowardice, From Liberty and Freedom to Servility and Slavery, From Knowledge to Ignorance, From Wisdom to Folly, From Light to Darkness, From Immortality to Sonia Congress Death!

The UPA II Government of the Italian Firangi Memsahib is stinking and sinking with corruption today. The highest constitutional authorities in the land --- the office of the President of India, the office of the Prime Minister of India, the office of the Chief Election Commissioner of India, the office of the Attorney General of India, and such other Constitutional authorities have been reduced to the level of subordinate offices of the Extra-Constitutional office of the Chairman of the UPA Co-Ordination Committee held

by Sonia Gandhi. The party office of the Congress President and the office of the UPA CoOrdination Committee are two sides of the same coin.

5

Right Hon’ble Justice Lord Moulton (1844-1921) I would like to invite the attention of the supremely irresponsibly and corrupt Men in authority at the highest level (taking their mysteriously immoral and concretely illegal hourly instructions from the office of the Chairman of the UPA Co-Ordination Committee!?!??) to the following observations of the Right Hon’ble Justice Lord Moulton, one of the greatest judges England has produced, in 1924: “There are three great domains of Human Action. First comes the Domain of Positive Law, where our actions are prescribed by laws binding upon us which must be obeyed. Next comes the Domain of Free Choice, which includes all those actions as to which we enjoy complete freedom. But between these two Domains there is a third large and important Domain in which there Rules neither Positive Law nor Absolute Freedom. In that Domain there is no LAW which inexorably defines our course of action, and yet we feel we are not free to choose as we would. The degree of this sense of a lack of Complete Freedom in this Domain varies in every case. It grades from a conspicuousness of a DUTY NEARLY AS STRONG AS POSITIVE LAW, TO A FEELING THAT THE MATTER IS ALL BUT A QUESTION OF PERSONAL CHOICE. Some might wish to parcel out this Domain into separate countries, calling one, for instance, the DOMAIN OF DUTY, another the DOMAIN OF GOOD FORM, but I prefer to look at it all as ONE DOMAIN, for it has one and the same characteristics throughout --- it is THE DOMAIN OF OBEDIENCE TO THE UNENFORCEABLE. To my mind the real greatness of a nation, its true civilization, is measured by THE EXTENT OF THIS LAND OF OBEDIENCE TO THE UNENFORCEABLE.”

All the constitutional Authorities of India today are not worried about the obedience to the unwritten ethical and moral law of the unenforceable as defined by Justice Lord

6

Moulton in the paragraph above. They are only worried about their slavish and shameless obedience to the unconstitutional law of the Italian Firangi Memsahib!

7