Fall 2015 - Volume 18 #1
PACKET NEWS
SLETTER OF SWARTHMORE COLLEGE LIBRARIES
Ensuring the preservation of and access to the print scholarly record: Recent initiatives by Peggy Seiden
Imagine you are a scholar doing research in LGBT movement in the eighties. One central primary source from that period was the Alyson Almanac that sought to bring together “A Treasury of Information for the Gay and Lesbian Community.” From a practical point of view, much of the material is out-of-date; and as a reference book, it might be seen as a candidate for withdrawal from the collection. But as a contemporaneous historical document, it is invaluable. Yet increasingly as libraries face space shortages, such materials are disappearing from the shelves. The shared print preservation initiatives are attempting to ensure that some print copies remain accessible to scholars. Shared print preservation has hit the mainstream press. A recent online Newsweek article noted that “even university libraries aren’t keeping their books.” While online access is quickly replacing print as a preferred means for scholars who need access to journal literature, print monographic collections and special collections continue to grow. Along with the need for additional space for growing collections, many libraries are “repurposing” their floor space for media and maker spaces, digital scholarship/humanities labs, writing centers, academic support services, and cafes. It is hard to justify maintaining or adding to existing shelving when significant parts of the print journal collections are no longer used and older monograph materials are consulted infrequently. The JSTOR (Journal Storage) project was conceived as a means to relieve some of these space pressures through high quality digitization of the back files of core academic journals. Many other scholarly journal publishers have digitized their own complete runs of journals, so that now it is unusual to find a major currently published scholarly journal that is not available online. Hundreds of academic libraries have already discarded their print copies with little thought to the broader needs of scholars for access to the “artifact” or for the possibility of re-digitization at some later time. Librarians have recognized that there should be
some number of print copies of these journals available, but that not every library needs to keep its copies. In a small way, the TriColleges tried to address this issue by dividing up the responsibility for retaining print copies of the JSTOR journals in 2005. But the real catalyst for thinking about print preservation and journal archiving on a national scale was the formation of WEST (the Western Storage Trust) in 2010. The project is centered at the California Digital Library, with more than 100 college and university libraries from Hawaii and to the Mississippi now participating in the project to archive print copies not only of JSTOR journals but more than 8000 journal families. To date, the project has archived more than 400,000 volumes. The scale of this particular project is immense and complex. The project not only encompasses journals that are digitally available and digitally preserved, but also journals for which no online equivalent exists. The archives are distributed across more than 30 libraries, though 6 libraries proactively build archives. The member libraries have entered into agreements either to retain certain journals or to financially support other libraries’ holdings in case they should need to have access to the print collections in the future. The archive holders have agreed to retain the journals for at least 25 years, though there is no plan to ensure retention of more than one copy of any journal. There are now at least a dozen such projects across the United States and Canada. In some cases, these archives are centralized in one or two storage facilities; in others, the most common model, libraries agree to retain the journals in their own facilities. Despite the broad engagement of the academic library community in this project, there is little coordination and the number of titles covered by these agreements is a fraction of the published journal literature. There is also no consensus on the number of copies of any title that should be retained in print. continued on page 2