DC One City Summer Initiative Report of Findings by SW Creatives, LLC

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ONE CITY

SUMMER initiative 2013 REPORT OF FINDINGS

PREPARED BY The DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

NOVEMBER 2013

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

2013 REPORT OF FINDINGS

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OVERVIEW OF THE 2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE PLANNING

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE PLANNING PROCESS

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE COMPONENTS

Component 1: Measurable Citywide Youth Goals

Component 2: Expanded Target Area Strategy

Component 3: Youth Engagement

Component 4: Fostering Collaboration and Strategic Resource Allocation

Component 5: Data Collection and Evaluation Strategy

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE PARTICIPANT PROFILES CHARACTERISTICS OF ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE YOUTH PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

REACHING YOUTH IN TARGET AREAS

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE WORKING TOWARD CITYWIDE GOALS THROUGH PROGRAMS AND EVENTS

OVERVIEW OF PROGRAMS

OVERVIEW OF EVENTS

OVERVIEW OF DROP-IN PROGRAMS

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE DISTRICT AGENCIES’ AND CBOS’ PARTICIPATION DISTRICT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES’ OCSI PARTICIPATION

36 36

DC Public Library OCSI Participation

DC Public Schools OCSI Participation

Department of Mental Health OCSI Participation

Department of Employment Services OCSI Participation

Department of Parks and Recreation OCSI Participation

Metropolitan Police Department OCSI Participation

Office of the State Superintendent of Education OCSI Participation

Other Agency OCSI Participation

TRUST-FUNDED COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS’ OCSI PARTICIPATION

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE FINDINGS

CHARACTERISTICS OF YOUTH SURVEY RESPONDENTS

LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES AND SATISFACTION OUTCOMES

ONE CITY SUMMER 2013 YOUTH OUTCOMES TOWARD CITYWIDE GOALS

GOAL 1: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

Younger Youth: Workforce Development Outcomes

Older Youth: Workforce Development Outcomes

Young Adults: Workforce Development Outcomes

GOAL 2: ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OUTCOMES

Younger Youth: Academic Achievement Outcomes

Older Youth: Academic Achievement Outcomes

Young Adults: Academic Achievement Outcomes

GOAL 3: HEALTHY LIFESTYLES OUTCOMES

Younger Youth: Healthy Lifestyles Outcomes

Older Youth: Healthy Lifestyles Outcomes

Young Adults: Healthy Lifestyles Outcomes

GOAL 4: SAFETY AND STRUCTURE OUTCOMES

Younger Youth: Safety and Structure Outcomes

Older Youth: Safety and Structure Outcomes

Young Adults: Safety and Structure Outcomes

SURVEY RESPONSES BY AGE GROUP

MPD SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE

RECOMMENDATIONS 54 PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND COLLABORATION

PROGRAM OFFERINGS

DATA COLLECTION/EVALUATION

FUNDING 55 COMMUNICATION/MARKETING 55

CONCLUSION 56 APPENDIX 58

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

FOREWORD IN THEIR WINTER 2011 ARTICLE

approach hamstrings a community’s abil-

in the Stanford Social Innovation Review, ity to tackle the complex, multi-layered John Kania and Mark Kramer diagnose a “adaptive problems” that form the core problem plaguing the work of the non- of society’s thorniest challenges. What is profit and government sectors. Cities and

needed instead, they argue, is a “collec-

regions, they explain, are often program

tive impact” strategy in which programs

rich but system poor. While programs

and services are collaborative, coordi-

abound, they often function in silos, lack

nated, and measured to achieve maxi-

common metrics and compete over

mum efficacy and efficiency across a city

the same limited resources. Kania and

or region.21

Kramer argue that this program-centered 2 John Kania and Mark Kramer (2011), “Collective Impact”, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 36–41.

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

The District of Columbia’s (the District) One City Summer Initiative (OCSI) bears many of the hallmarks of this “collective impact” strategy. It is a COLLABORATIVE INITIATIVE, drawing on the talents and resources of 27 District government agencies, more than 100 community-based organizations, dozens of young adult and community leaders, and over 19,600 children and youth. It is a COORDINATED INITIATIVE with an intermediary organization, the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation (the Trust), straddling the public and nonprofit communities and serving as the lead entity administering the project on behalf of the District government. And it is a GOAL- ORIENTED AND DATA-DRIVEN INITIATIVE based on shared citywide youth goals and a comprehensive data and evaluation plan capable of measuring impact. Having just completed the third year of the OSCI, we can add a fourth component to what makes it a successful model of the “collective impact” strategy: it is a LONGTERM INITIATIVE. OCSI has grown from an explicitly anti-crime initiative to a citywide children, youth and community development strategy focusing on target areas and the District overall. Centered on youth development outcomes and achieving positive, meaningful changes in the lives of children, youth and families, the One City Summer Initiative has become a stable, robust and institutionalized initiative within the District. It has changed in response to experiences, recommendations and shifting budgetary realities, and there is still much that can be improved. We are committed to the continual growth and evolution of the One City Summer Initiative into the year-round One City Youth Initiative and to the positive changes it can bring to the lives of District residents. We invite you to read further about OCSI 2013.

What is needed... is a “

collective impact” strategy FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IN 2013, MAYOR VINCENT GRAY

Each year, the initiative has grown more comprehen-

launched the District of Columbiaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s (the

sive in its scope, planning, and depth of engagement

District) third citywide summer youth strategy. Originally an anti-crime initiative, the One City Summer Initiative (OCSI) has

OCSI focused on an intentional alignment with the five citywide youth outcomes (Workforce Development, Academic Achievement, Healthy Lifestyles, Safety and

evolved into a coordinated, collaborative

Structure, and Strengthening Families) and developing

effort to provide meaningful, safe, and

measures to evaluate youth development toward those

engaging summer experiences that enhance opportunity and youth development outcomes for over 19,600 of the Districtâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s children and youth ages 5 to 24 years.

with youth and their families. The 2013 iteration of

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

outcomes. In addition, OCSI 2013 strengthened its data collection and evaluation strategy and methods to provide a more accurate count of participants, programs and youth outcomes. The findings from these efforts indicate that the initiative was a success.

65%

of younger and older youth feel motivated to learn new things, positive about the future and happy with themselves

65%

73%

of youth better understand the importance of going to college

of all youth would recommend their summer program to a friend

OCSI 2013 YOUTH OUTCOME HIGHLIGHTS

»» Seventy-seven percent of youth felt safe at their

The citywide youth outcomes include the areas of

»» Seventy-three percent of youth would recommend

Workforce Development, Academic Achievement, Healthy

summer programs.

their summer program to a friend.

Lifestyles, Safety and Structure and Strengthening Families, and OCSI 2013 programming and events were

In addition to achieving progress in these youth outcome

intentionally aligned to those outcomes.

areas, the summer also saw a reduction in crime. Adult and youth violent crimes declined in the Metropolitan

Highlights of responses to a survey given to all OCSI pro-

Police Department’s (MPDs) Summer Crime Initiative

gram participants (regardless of the nature of the program

(SCI) areas: homicides (–83%); robberies (–50%); and

in which they participated) included:

armed burglaries (–32%). Juvenile arrests in the SCI’s also decreased by 48%.

»» Over 60% of older youth and young adults can talk about careers they are interested in and 66% know the skills and steps needed for employment. »» Sixty-five percent of youth better understand the importance of going to college. »» Over 50% of younger youth learned to read and write

OCSI 2013 PARTICIPATION HIGHLIGHTS For OCSI 2013, programmatic offerings were defined as follows: »» PROGRAMS: organized and coordinated activities

better and improved their skills in math, science,

that occurred for at least five days (consecutively or

computers and technology.

non-consecutively).

»» Sixty-five percent of younger and older youth feel

»» EVENTS: one-time, short-term activities held in

motivated to learn new things, positive about their

neighborhoods across the city that provided fun

future and happy with themselves.

activities for young people, resources and information for families and community-building opportunities for all residents.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

Programming Highlights

33,967 Duplicated Children, Youth, and Families in 441 EVENTS 6,775 Duplicated Youth in 66 DROP-IN PROGRAMS at 35 Sites

19,622 Unique Youth in 121 PROGRAMS at 602 Sites

»» DROP-IN PROGRAMMING: repeated, structured

Overall, when the duplications are included, there were

activities that allowed for youth to drop-in and

close to 27,000 youth engagements across all forms of OCSI

participate.

programming (programs and drop-in programs) in 2013.1

Through an increased focus on data collection methods compared to the previous summers, OCSI 2013 calculated a more accurate count of 19,622 unique youth participants in OCSI programs. However, because of the vari-

Other participation highlights include: »» Government agencies and community-based organizations (CBOs) hosted 121 programs at 602 sites

ous types of activities offered through OCSI, youth may

throughout the district.

have participated in multiple programs, and youth who participated in a program also may have participated in

»» The Department of Mental Health (DMH) and

drop-in programs and community events which created

DC Public Library (DCPL) hosted 66 unique

duplicated counts for these types of activities. Moreover,

drop-in programs at 35 sites.

the very nature of drop-in programs and events made it difficult to avoid duplicated counts of children and youth

»» Government agencies and CBOs hosted 441 community events, the majority of which targeted healthy

in those categories; the events category was especially

lifestyles and safety and structure goals.

challenging to account for because participants included families and not just youth. 1

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

In 2012, there were 40,000 duplicated OCSI youth engagements. The 2013 figure does not represent 13,000 fewer youth than last year, but indicates the increased ability to remove duplications yielding a more accurate number.

»» The Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR), DCPL,

Services (DMHHS), and the Deputy Mayor for Education

and other agency and CBO sites served 1,293,300

(DME). The Trust also took the primary responsibility for

meals through the DC Free Summer Meals Program,

implementing the evaluation component.

overseen by the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE) during the summer. »» Nearly 6,000 (duplicated) youth were served in programs in the nine identified neighborhood “target areas.” »» The DC Children and Youth Investment Trust

YOUTH ENGAGEMENT The OCSI 2013 organizers made a deliberate and concerted effort to engage youth in planning and shaping this year’s initiative. A citywide “youth voice” survey in February, youth focus groups in March and the addition

Corporation (the Trust) distributed almost $3 million

of the Youth Planning Team (YPT) composed of high

in grants to 97 community-based organizations to

school students enabled greater youth voice in the plan-

operate summer programs. These funds were divided

ning process. Also, Young Adult Coordinators (YACs) as

between traditional summer grants and mini-grants

on-the-ground facilitators of the Target Area strategy

and supported programming for 3,874 youth in the

infused a distinct youth presence in OCSI 2013.

target areas and across the District. Other summer programs that operated in the city outside of the One City Summer Initiative are not reflected in this count or in this report.

FOSTERING COLLABORATION AND STRATEGIC RESOURCE ALLOCATION OCSI 2013 also saw the development of a more extensive community engagement strategy, enhanced strategic

PLANNING PROCESS Thoughtful collaborative planning and programming

collaboration and resource allocation, and the development of a One City Youth website to facilitate public awareness of OCSI programs and activities.

by 27 District government agencies and more than 100 community-based partners was central to OCSI 2013.

A more comprehensive and varied funding process allowed

The Trust coordinated OCSI 2013 with guidance from

the participation of a wider, more diverse array of commu-

the offices of the Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and

nity-based organizations that provided programs, services,

Justice (DMPSJ), the Deputy Mayor for Health and Human

and events in the target areas and across the District.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

MEASURABLE CITYWIDE YOUTH GOALS The initiative continued its goal-driven approach to summer programming by focusing on five citywide youth goals. In 2012, OCSI organizers developed five citywide summer goals based on core youth development principles that were widely adopted in the District of Columbia. Responding to feedback from OCSI 2012, those goals were revised to be more comprehensive, age-appropriate and measurable. They were also aligned with agency goals and ongoing District initiatives and legislation such as RaiseDC, the Mayor’s One City Action Plan, the City Council’s Healthy Schools Act, Workforce Investment Council (WIC), and other citywide initiatives. The outcome measures were also aligned to accurately measure OCSI’s progress towards the youth outcomes. In OCSI 2013, the five goals for children, youth and families were: »» GOAL 1: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: Young people will gain meaningful work and career exposure, experience, and skills. »» GOAL 2: ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT: Children and youth will increase their academic knowledge and skills and increase their chance of academic advancement. »» GOAL 3: HEALTHY LIFESTYLES: Children and youth will increasingly adopt healthy lifestyles. »» GOAL 4: SAFETY AND STRUCTURE: Children and youth will have a safe summer. »» GOAL 5: STRENGTHENING FAMILIES: Children, youth and families will have opportunities to strengthen their family.

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

EXPANDED TARGET AREA STRATEGY The selection of target areas followed the same collaborative process as in past years. The OCSI steering committee looked at crime and social indicators to select nine areas to focus its efforts. Youth and homeless families sheltered at DC General Homeless Shelter (DC General) were also target populations. Recognizing that OCSI 2012 2013 One City Summer Initiative Target Area and Summer Crime Initiative Area Map

struggled to meet the goals of family strengthening and engaging older youth, the OCSI 2013 Target Area Strategy was refined to focus more attention on programming and outreach anchored in DC Housing Authority (DCHA) communities within the target areas. This partnership with DCHA communities allowed for available services to be brought directly into the communities where the youth and families reside.

SCI AREA 1: EDGEWOOD (WARD 5 – PSA 502)

TARGET AREA 5: KENILWORTH (WARD 7 – PSA 601)

SCI AREA 5: KENILWORTH WARD 7 – PSA 601)

TARGET AREA 6: LINCOLN HEIGHTS & RICHARDSON DWELLINGS (WARD 7 – PSA 602 & 608)

TARGET AREA 3: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS (WARD 1 – PSA 302)

SCI AREA 2: TRINIDAD (WARD 5 – PSA 506)

TARGET AREA 1: SURSUM CORDA (WARDS 2 & 6 – PSA 103)

TARGET AREA 2: GREENLEAF (WARDS 2 & 6 – PSA 105)

SCI AREA 4: SHIPLEY (WARD 8 – PSA 705)

TARGET AREA 7: BENNING TERRACE (WARD 7 – 604)

TARGET AREA 4: LANGSTON DWELLINGS (WARDS 5 & 6 – PSA 507)

TARGET AREA 8: WOODLAND TERRACE (WARD 7 – PSA 702)

TARGET AREA AREA 9: 9: TARGET WASHINGTON HIGHLANDS HIGHLANDS WASHINGTON (WARD 77 –– PSA PSA 706) 706) (WARD

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION STRATEGY The enhanced data and evaluation strategy enabled an easier data entry process for agencies and CBOs. Coordinated efforts between agencies and CBOs yielded a unique count of youth participating in programs and more accurate demographic data. Outcome measures, including a youth survey and focus groups, were more closely aligned to the stated citywide goals, which allowed for more accurate assessments of OCSI youth’s

»» Expand data collection and evaluation: The OCSI data collection and evaluation process was a significant step in the progression towards a comprehensive citywide data collection, sharing, and evaluation system. The development of a citywide data system would streamline the data collection process and allow for more rigorous evaluations, analyses, and longitudinal studies. »» Enhance internal and external communications and marketing using traditional and social media outlets.

satisfaction with programming and a richer perspective on the knowledge and skills they believe they acquired.

Drawing on this feedback, planning has already begun for the year-round One City Youth Initiative.

FEEDBACK AND RECOMMENDATIONS Using a survey and individual interviews, the Trust col-

SCOPE OF THIS REPORT

lected feedback from government agency and CBO staff.

This report was designed to document youth partici-

Focus groups with OCSI youth participants and the YACs

pation in the OCSI initiative, identify youth outcomes

were also held to capture their experience of the summer

and present recommendations for upcoming One City

and their suggestions for future efforts. Analysis and dis-

Youth programming. A companion study of the process

cussion of results will be provided in subsequent OCSI

of planning and implementation is forthcoming. The

reports. However, through the participation data, out-

OCSI Report was prepared by the Trust as the coordi-

come data and feedback, a few themes emerged:

nating entity for the One City Summer Initiative with input from several participating District agencies and

»» Expand coordinated programming: Taking the

CBOs. Comments and questions are welcome and can be

planned and coordinated approach year-round

directed to the Report’s co-authors, Dr. Sarah Manekin

would better address persistent challenges to youth

(Director of Research) at smanekin@cyitc.org and

engagement and success.

Dr. Nisha Sachdev (Research and Evaluation Manager) at nsachdev@cyitc.org.

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

OVERVIEW of the 2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

Originally an anti-crime strategy, the One City Summer

The 2013 initiative capitalized on the successes achieved

Initiative (OCSI) has evolved into a coordinated, collabo-

in the summers of 2011 and 2012. Whereas those earlier

rative effort to:

initiatives focused on building and institutionalizing a collaborative framework and developing youth goals,

1. Provide meaningful summer experiences for participating youth ages 5 to 24 across the city; 2. Achieve positive outcomes for children and youth as measured by the five citywide youth goals; 3. Provide a safe summer for all residents in part by reducing violence and crime in targeted neighborhoods; 4. Collect accurate, comprehensive youth and program data that will enable more strategic resource allocation in the future; and 5. Increase collaboration among District government agencies and community-based partners.

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

OCSI 2013 honed those strategies and procedures to achieve more effective inter-agency and public-private collaborations; better outcomes for children, youth and families; higher levels of youth engagement and more accurate data regarding participation, programming and youth outcomes. Details of those changes follow in the planning section of this report. As in past years, District government agencies and CBOs sponsored a wide variety of summer programs and community events. For OCSI 2013, we grouped those offerings into categories: Programs were defined as organized and coordinated activities that occurred for at least five

Over 19,600 unique children and youth participated in 121 OCSI programs at 602 sites across the District.

days (consecutively or non-consecutively). Events were

children, youth and families. A detailed discussion of par-

one-time, short-term activities held in neighborhoods

ticipation and programming follows in the “Participant

across the city that provided fun activities for young

Profile” and “Working Toward Citywide Goals” sections of

people, resources and information for families, and com-

the report.

munity-building opportunities for all residents. Drop-In Programming was defined as repeated, structured activ-

A detailed discussion of the positive impact on these

ities that allowed for youth to drop-in and participate.

youth participants is located in the “Findings” section at the end of the report.

Over 19,600 unique children and youth participated in 121 OCSI programs at 602 sites across the District. The government agencies and community-based organizations (CBO) that ran these programs intentionally aligned them with the five citywide youth goals. In addition to this structured programming, two government agencies also hosted 66 unique drop-in programs for 6,775 children and youth, and government agencies and CBOs hosted 441 community events for approximately 34,000

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

PLANNING

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE PLANNING PROCESS The OCSI was led by the Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and Justice (DMPSJ), the Deputy Mayor of Health and Human Services (DMHHS), and the Deputy Mayor for Education (DME), on behalf of Mayor Vincent C. Gray. As in 2012, the Deputy Mayors worked closely with leadership from the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation (Trust) to convene District government agency directors and their key summer staff for regular planning and implementation meetings. Two central bodies formed the core of the planning process for OCSI 2013. The first group was made up of the Deputy Mayors and agency directors. Meeting monthly beginning in January 2013, this group was responsible for the high-level coordination and accountability necessary for a successful collaboration. The Steering Committee, composed of high- and mid-level agency staffers with significant content-area knowledge and agency influence, met monthly beginning in December 2012. The Steering Committee was responsible for informing the development of the initiative strategy, making recommendations to their agency directors, and general administration of the initiative. Steering Committee members met in smaller working groups to develop specific initiative components, including the Target Area Strategy, the

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

communications and marketing strategy and the data and evaluation strategy. (See Appendix A online for a list of agencies that participated in the planning and programming.) In addition to the regular Directorsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; and Steering Committee meetings, planners used a shared technology platform to facilitate the dissemination of agendas, planning documents and other resources. In 2013, the organizers also made more deliberate attempts to reach beyond government agencies and engage community stakeholders and youth themselves in the planning process. At the end of February, the Trust convened a Citywide Summer Strategy Session for community-based organizations (CBOs). The Trust followed up on this Strategy Session with ward-level meetings in April in which community leaders, representatives of CBOs, and key staff from several agencies learned about the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s youth goals and shared program information and resources. (Appendix B online provides a planning timeline.) Organizers also worked to include youth voices in the planning process. During the spring of 2013, the Trust held five youth focus groups in the selected target areas to get a sense of the kinds of programs youth engaged in during previous summers, and what they would like to see in their areas in summer 2013. A citywide youth

“voice” survey was created and disseminated to youth

City Action Plan, 53the City Council’s Healthy Schools

throughout the city via CBOs and youth serving agencies

Act 64 and the Mayor’s Workforce Investment Council

in February. Over 1,700 youth completed surveys. (See

(WIC).75(See Appendix D online for the Goals Matrix.)

Appendix C online for youth voice survey and focus groups.) Finally, organizers convened a Youth Planning Team (YPT) of approximately 15 older youth from across the District. YPT members were offered community ser-

The five youth- and family-related goals

vice hours and a stipend to participate in bi-weekly meet-

undergirding OCSI 2013 were:

ings from April through August. They served as youth liaisons, gathering feedback from District youth and sharing

»» GOAL 1: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT:

their knowledge and information with the OCSI Steering

Young people will gain meaningful work

Committee members.

and career exposure, experience, and skills.

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE COMPONENTS COMPONENT 1: MEASURABLE CITYWIDE YOUTH GOALS In 2012, OCSI organizers developed citywide summer goals based on core youth development principles that were already in use in the District. Responding to feed-

»» GOAL 2: ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT: Children and youth will increase their academic knowledge and skills and increase their chance of academic advancement. »» GOAL 3: HEALTHY LIFESTYLES: Children and youth will increasingly adopt healthy lifestyles.

back from OCSI 2012 and a desire to make the youth goals

»» GOAL 4: SAFETY AND STRUCTURE:

more comprehensive, age-appropriate and measurable,

Children and youth will have a safe

a substantial revision took place in 2013. The goal areas

summer.

were revised and supplemented by the inclusion of more specific “youth developmental outcomes” from the Advancing Youth Development (AYD) framework.31These outcomes were further refined by age categories cor-

»» GOAL 5: STRENGTHENING FAMILIES: Children, youth and families will have opportunities to strengthen their family.

responding to child/youth development research: younger youth ages 5–12 years; older youth 13–18 years and young adults 19–24 years. These age-appropriate

All participating District government agencies and Trust-

outcomes will be used to measure short-, intermedi-

funded community-based organizations were required

ate-, and long-term progress. The goals and outcomes

to offer programming that met one or more of the

were aligned with existing agency metrics and other

citywide goals.

citywide initiatives, such as RaiseDC, the Mayor’s One 42

3 4

For information on the Advancing Youth Development visit: http:// www.cyitc.org/elements/file/Indicators%20OST%20providers.pdf For information on the Raise DC Initiative visit: http://www.raisedc.net/

5 For information on the One City Action Plan visit: http://ocap.dc.gov/ 6 For information on the Healthy Schools Act visit: http://osse.dc.gov/ service/healthy-schools-act-legislation 7 For information on the DC Workforce Investment Council visit: http:// dc.gov/DC/DMPED/Programs+and+Initiatives/DC+Workforce+Investment+Council?nav=1&vgnextrefresh=1w

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

COMPONENT 2: EXPANDED TARGET AREA STRATEGY The One City Summer Initiative began in 2010 as a strategy to reduce crime in identified high-crime communities. While a major goal of the initiative remains to create a safe summer for District residents, the initiative has evolved into a more comprehensive youth development strategy in targeted neighborhoods and across the District, knowing that if the District can engage children and youth in more meaningful activities, there will be a noticeable decline in negative outcomes. In 2012, the Summer Steering Committee and the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) mapped crime data and selected social and behavioral indicators such as teenage pregnancy and academic outcomes. Youth indicators were mapped across Police Service Areas (PSA) and were compared to a map noting locations of Trustfunded programs, DC Public Schools (DCPS), DC Public Libraries (DCPL), and Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) facilities, among other youth-serving efforts. Not surprisingly, it became clear that those areas with little programming had a greater incidence of teen pregnancies and other negative health, social, and education indicators. The result was the identification of areas of particular need, called “target areas.” (Appendix E online provides a set of maps used to identify the target areas.) Responding to the success of the 2012 Target Area Strategy, the OCSI 2013 Steering Committee undertook the same analysis with updated crime, socio-economic and behavioral data in January 2013. From that analysis, ten PSAs (103, 105, 302, 507, 601, 602, 604, 608, 702, and 706) were selected and identified as nine target areas. DC General shelter was identified as another target area for Summer 2013. In April 2013, MPD reviewed the most recent crime data and identified four high crime areas as Summer Crime Initiative (SCI) areas, with one of the four SCI areas (Target Area 5: Kenilworth) overlapping with the OCSI target areas for 2013.

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

The nine OCSI Target Areas (TAs) were: »» TARGET AREA 1: Sursum Corda (Wards 2 and 6 – PSA 103) »» TARGET AREA 2: Greenleaf (Wards 2 and 6 – PSA 105) »» TARGET AREA 3: Columbia Heights (Ward 1 – PSA 302) »» TARGET AREA 4: Langston Dwellings (Wards 5 and 6 – PSA 507) »» TARGET AREA 5: Kenilworwth (Ward 7 – PSA 601) »» TARGET AREA 6: Lincoln Heights & Richardson Dwellings (Ward 7 – PSA 602 and 608) »» TARGET AREA 7: Benning Terrace (Ward 7 – 604) »» TARGET AREA 8: Woodland Terrace (Ward 7 – PSA 702) »» TARGET AREA 9: Washington Highlands (Ward 7 – PSA 706) The four MPD SCI areas were: »» SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE AREA 1: Edgewood (Ward 5 – PSA 502) »» SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE AREA 2: Trinidad (Ward 5 – PSA 506) »» SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE AREA 3: Kenilworth (Ward 7 – PSA 601) »» SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE AREA 4: Shipley (Ward 8 – PSA 705)

2013 One City Summer Initiative Target Area and Summer Crime Initiative Area Map

SCI AREA 1: EDGEWOOD (WARD 5 – PSA 502)

TARGET AREA 5: KENILWORTH (WARD 7 – PSA 601)

SCI AREA 5: KENILWORTH WARD 7 – PSA 601)

TARGET AREA 6: LINCOLN HEIGHTS & RICHARDSON DWELLINGS (WARD 7 – PSA 602 & 608)

TARGET AREA 3: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS (WARD 1 – PSA 302)

SCI AREA 2: TRINIDAD (WARD 5 – PSA 506)

TARGET AREA 1: SURSUM CORDA (WARDS 2 & 6 – PSA 103)

TARGET AREA 2: GREENLEAF (WARDS 2 & 6 – PSA 105)

SCI AREA 4: SHIPLEY (WARD 8 – PSA 705)

TARGET AREA 7: BENNING TERRACE (WARD 7 – 604)

TARGET AREA 4: LANGSTON DWELLINGS (WARDS 5 & 6 – PSA 507)

TARGET AREA 8: WOODLAND TERRACE (WARD 7 – PSA 702)

TARGET AREA 9: WASHINGTON HIGHLANDS (WARD 7 – PSA 706)

Recognizing that OCSI 2012 struggled to meet the goals

rooted in DC Housing Authority (DCHA) communities

of family strengthening and engaging older youth, the

within the target areas. This allowed the team to use

OCSI 2013 Target Area Strategy was refined to allow for

DCHA’s Office of Resident Services to engage residents,

more attention to those goals. Specifically, planners

focus their programming efforts and allow access to

focused more attention on programming and outreach

cross-generational segments of residents.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

Also new in 2013, Young Adult Coordinators served as

In addition, the decision to hire Young Adult Coordinators

on-site program and outreach facilitators in each of the

and make them essential on-the-ground personnel

Target Areas. The Young Adult Coordinators were all

reflected the planners’ belief in older youth as valuable

originally from DC, growing up in or near the targeted

community leaders and important role models for the

neighborhoods. The Young Adult Coordinators also

neighborhoods in which they served. (See Appendix F

served as OCSI’s “ears to the ground” and provided

online for the Young Adult Coordinator job description

weekly target area updates to the Steering Committee

and application.) Being from the neighborhoods, they

and DC Government agency directors once the summer

enjoyed a greater level of trust and support from most

was underway.

members of the community, and they connected youth and residents to the OCSI programs and services being

COMPONENT 3: YOUTH ENGAGEMENT

offered. They also gave valuable feedback to the Steering

The OCSI 2013 planners made a deliberate and concerted

Committee and District agency directors on community

effort to engage youth in planning and shaping the One

needs and interests. While a few of the Young Adult

City Summer Initiative. As discussed above, part of this

Coordinators struggled to achieve buy-in from some

effort was focused on including youth voice in planning

older community residents, their work was widely lauded

the summer experience. The decision to host outreach

as both demonstrating OCSI’s commitment to youth

events in the evening hours of 6–9 pm to better engage

voice and providing insight into what was happening on

older youth, for example, was a direct result of feedback

the ground in the neighborhoods.

generated in youth surveys and through the planning team. The Youth Planning Team also played a vital role in

COMPONENT 4: FOSTERING COLLABORATION

organizing and promoting the One City Summer Kick-Off,

AND STRATEGIC RESOURCE ALLOCATION

an event that drew approximately 5,000 people, many

The One City Summer Initiative has grown in size and scale

of whom were teenagers, a population that consistently

over the years, requiring the coordinated collaboration of

had been hard to engage in previous years.

dozens of agency leaders, staffers and community-based organizations. The Trust convened the meetings that brought government agencies, community leaders

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

and youth together and worked with the Steering Committee to organize the day-to-day administration of the initiative. Partners in OCSI 2012 recommended that a central repository of summer programming information be created; the development of such a website was central to the collaborative planning effort for OCSI 2013. The result was Onecityyouth.dc.gov. 86The website was designed to meet the needs of four audiences: Youth, families, programs, and decision makers. Key elements for youth and families are: a calendar of events which contains government- and public-sponsored events; a search tool for young people and their families to find services and supports and easy-to-find links to popular government programs such as year-round employment. The website was the public face of OCSI 2013 and facilitated community engagement and outreach. The Trust also coordinated the strategic deployment and distribution of resources so that agencies and nonprofit partners could most effectively leverage available public dollars to best serve children, youth and families in areas of need.

In addition to District government agency funding,

the Trust distributed almost $3 million in District funds to

97 CBOs

in support of summer programming.

Each participating District government agency was required to provide four “evening outreach” programs over the course of the summer. (Appendix G online provides a calendar of the planned “evening outreach” events.) By identifying the target areas and organizing a calendar of events, the Steering Committee created a framework in which all agencies could use their previously budgeted resources to become involved in OCSI without duplicating efforts or over-saturating certain neighborhoods with programming. The summer programming and youth development work was also carried out by community-based organizations. The Trust’s “Traditional Summer Program” grant provided

public funding for established CBOs to serve 25–50 youth in 20–30 hours of programming each week for six weeks. The Trust allocated more than $2.2 million in traditional summer program grants to 67 CBOs that offered programming for 2,875 children and youth. New in 2013, OCSI provided $500,000 in “mini-grants” for smaller-scale programs and events, giving priority to programs serving young people in the target areas and those that had outcomes tied to academic achievement. Minigrants were awarded to both established CBOs and new or emerging CBOs that had a history and relationship to residents in the target area populations, or who were engaged in work that was considered to meet a strategic

8 http://onecityyouth.dc.gov/

need. These mini-grants supported one-time events and

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

longer-term (but still smaller in scale than traditional)

For 2013, the OCSI data and evaluation strategy

programs. Considerations were made based on program

consisted of:

location, target age group, and target goal area—to try to ensure as even a spread of programs as possible.

»» A data collection template which government agencies and CBOs used to collect programmatic

Including the mini-grants, the Trust distributed almost

information including geographic location and

$3 million in District funds for direct grant support to 97

targeted goals and demographic information about

community-based organizations that provided summer

the children and youth they were serving.

programming for a total of 3,874 children and youth. The Trust coordinated the competitive RFP process and oversaw the grant compliance for OCSI. (Appendix H online presents a list of the Trust-funded CBOs.) COMPONENT 5: DATA COLLECTION AND EVALU-

the characteristics of the participants, their perspective on what they did and learned over the summer and their satisfaction with the program. »» Interviews and focus groups with OCSI youth

ATION STRATEGY

participants, Young Adult Coordinators and

Planners and agency leaders praised the OCSI 2012 data

government leaders.

and evaluation component as providing a valuable resource for understanding the successes and shortcomings of the summer program. Therefore, when it came time to organize data collection and evaluation for OCSI 2013, planners engaged in selective tweaking and refining so as to achieve cleaner, more accurate data in a more streamlined, user-accessible manner. Led by the Trust’s Research and Evaluation Manager, the data collection strategy involved revising the data collection template to include individual identifiers and separate tabs for programs, events and drop-in programs; these revisions were all aimed toward reducing the number of duplicated counts and establishing a more accurate baseline for long-term tracking toward outcomes. The youth participant post survey (youth survey) was also revised to more closely align with the youth outcomes. Finally, at the conclusion of the summer, Trust leaders conducted focus groups with the OCSI youth participants and Young Adult Coordinators and held individual interviews with a selection of agency directors and steering committee members. (See Appendix I online for the Data Collection tools.)

»» A post-participation youth survey which collected

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

»» Cleaning and analyzing the quantitative data. All quantitative data was scrubbed for duplicated records and analyzed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) version 9.3. Review of data, including double entry and data checks, was implemented to ensure data accuracy. This data allowed the Trust to report on OCSI participant demographic information, participation rates, summer goals impacted, geographic distribution of programs, youth perceptions of their experience in the summer programming, and the reflections of youth participants, youth staff and initiative organizers. The data was also used to create a descriptive analysis to measure the overall effectiveness of the OCSI. Some of the findings are discussed in the following sections; other findings will appear in subsequent reports.

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

PARTICIPANT PROFILES CHARACTERISTICS OF ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE YOUTH PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS During the Summer of 2013, 19,622 unique children and youth participated in 121 OCSI programs at 602 sites throughout the district; 6,775 children and youth participated in 66 drop-in programs at 35 sites, nearly 34,000 children, youth and families attended 441 community events, and the DC Free Summer Meal Program served 1,293,300 meals at 357 sites to District residents up to age 18. The 19,622 unique children and youth who participated in 2013 OCSI does not include youth participating in DC Public Library and DMH drop-in programming, DPR pool visits, and OSSE’s Free Summer Meals Program, as unique

»» Thirty percent of the youth served came from the target areas and 75% of youth served came from the four wards that surround those target areas; and »» More than 50% of the participants came from Wards 7 and 8 combined; and »» More than half, 58%, of the participants had previously participated in a summer program. »» Over 200 youth participated in more than one OCSI program. Additional information about OCSI participants is found in Table 1. The data in the table reports the demographic characteristics of the 19,622 unique youth participants.

youth information was not available. Highlights from the children and youth participation data include: »» Males and females participated at comparable rates, 53% and 47%, respectively; »» Sixty-six percent of the youth were in high school or graduated high school (but not enrolled in college); »» Sixty-eight percent of participants were between the ages of 10 and 18;

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of Youth Program Participants (unduplicated)Ŧ YOUTH CHARACTERISTIC

OCSI PARTICIPANTS = 19,622 YOUTH TOTAL

PERCENTAGE

Gender/Sex

YOUTH CHARACTERISTIC

OCSI PARTICIPANTS = 19,622 YOUTH TOTAL

PERCENTAGE

TA 7: Benning Terrace

1,037

TA 8: Woodland Terrace

508

TA 9: Washington Highlands

678

Non-Target Area

13,556

69%

<1%

Female

10,317

53%

Male

9,290

47%

No Response

–

Younger Youth (5–12 years)

6,651

34%

Older Youth (13–18 years)

9,731

50%

Young Adults (19–24 years)

3,159

16%

Asian/Pacific Islander 285

No response

–

Black/African American

15,756

89%

Hispanic/Latino

1,060

Age Group

Youth Ward

Ethnicity/Race American Indian/ Alaska Native

White

264

1,704

Other

334

345

No response

1,841

–

341

2,368

12%

3,035

16%

Elementary School or Below

3,463

21%

1,901

10%

Middle School

3,165

19%

4,855

25%

High School

9,921

60%

4,988

26%

College

No response

–

Some College

No response

3,028

–

TA 1: Sursum Corda

<1%

TA 2: Greenleaf

382

TA 3: Columbia Heights

680

TA 4: Langston Dwellings

681

TA 5: Kenilworth

603

TA 6: Lincoln Heights / Richardson Dwellings

1,474

Youth Target Area

Highest Education Level

Prior Program Participant Yes

10,426

58%

7,589

42%

No response

1,607

–

Participant in More Than One 2013 OCSI Program Yes

209

19,413

99%

Ŧ This table does not include participation for drop-in programming such as DC Public Library and Department of Mental Health drop-in programs, DPR pool visits, and the DC Free Summer Meals Program.

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

Figure 1: Demographic characteristics of youth participants AGE GROUP

YOUTH WARD

YOUNGER YOUTH

16%

(5–13) 34%

2% 2%

WARD 2

26% 12%

OLDER YOUTH

YOUNG ADULTS

WARD 3 WARD 4

(14–18) 50%

WARD 1

16%

25%

(19–24)

10%

WARD 5 WARD 6 WARD 7 WARD 8

HIGHEST EDUCATION LEVEL

PRIOR PROGRAM PARTICIPATION

ELEMENTARY 21%

SCHOOL OR BELOW MIDDLE SCHOOL

60%

19%

HIGH SCHOOL

58%

42%

YES NO

REACHING YOUTH IN TARGET AREAS Programs and events were deliberately operated in the

Many programs were hosted in multiple sites and children

target areas to provide meaningful engagement for

and youth could attend multiple programs. (Note: For pro-

young people and their families living in or near those

grams, the table shows the number of youth participants

communities. This section of the report highlights youth

from each target area that participated in summer pro-

participation in OCSI by target areas.

grams across the District and the number of youth served by programs in the target areas; for events and drop-in

Table 2 examines the broad scope of programming that

programs, this table focuses only on youth served in the

occurred in the target areas. It illustrates the number of

target areas, not their home neighborhoods.)

duplicated children and youth served by programs, events and drop-in programs within the target areas as well as the number of programming sites within those areas.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

Table 2: Number of OCSI 2013 Youth Participants by Target AreaŦ PROGRAMS

DROP-IN PROGRAMMING

TARGET AREA

WARD

PSA

TA 1: Sursum Corda

2 and 6

103

309

932

326

TA 2: Greenleaf

2 and 6

105

384

426

1,771

146

TA 3: Columbia Heights

302

677

598

1,484

–

TA 4: Langston Dwellings

5 and 6

507

685

799

359

534

TA 5: Kenilworth

601

607

303

1,606

–

TA 6: Lincoln Heights/ Richardson Dwellings

602/ 608

1,492

2,214

911

255

TA 7: Benning Terrace

604

1,048

509

3,253

TA 8: Woodland Terrace

702

512

441

1,902

–

TA 9: Washington Highlands

706

684

368

422

TOTAL TARGET AREA

–

6,112

5,967

186

12,640

221

1,349

Non-Target Area

–

13,720

13,865

416

21,327

220

5,426

TOTAL OCSI

–

19,832

602

33,967

441

6,775

EVENTS

NUMBER OF DUPLICATED CHILDREN AND YOUTH FROM EACH TARGET AREA

NUMBER OF CHILD AND YOUTH PARTICIPANTS SERVED BY PROGRAMS IN TARGET AREA

NUMBER OF PROGRAM SITES

NUMBER OF CHILD, YOUTH, AND FAMILY PARTICIPANTS ATTENDING EVENTS IN TARGET AREA

NUMBER OF EVENTS

NUMBER OF CHILD AND YOUTH PARTICIPANTS SERVED BY DROP-IN PROGRAMS IN TARGET AREA

NUMBER OF DROP-IN PROGRAM SITES

This does not include the DC Free Summer Meals Program and DPR pool visits.

As illustrated in Table 2, Target Area 7 (Benning Terrace)

hosted more youth in programs than can be accounted

had a high number of children and youth from that area

for by the number of youth from that area, suggesting

participate in OCSI programs; however, less than half of

that youth traveled to Target Area 6 to participate in pro-

that number were involved in programming in that tar-

grams. Sursum Corda had the lowest number of youth

get area, suggesting they traveled away from their home

from that target area participating in programs. Further

neighborhood. Target Area 6 (Lincoln Heights/Richardson

analysis of how many eligible youth (ages 5–24) live in

Dwellings) hosted more young people in programs than

each target area indicated that Target Area 7 (Benning

any of the other target areas. Moreover, Target Area 6

Terrace) has a higher percentage of youth compared to

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

Sursum Corda, which has the lowest percentage of youth

sites and had the highest number of youth drop-in pro-

of the five target areas.

gram participants.

Table 2 also illustrates that Target Area 7 (Benning Terrace)

Figure 2 shows youth participation in programs by

hosted the most participants for events, and Target Area

age and target areas. In this figure, youth participation

4 (Langston Dwellings) hosted the most drop-in program

refers to where the youth attended programs, not their home neighborhoods.

Figure 2: OCSI 2013 Participation in Programs by Target Area and Age GroupŦ OLDER YOUTH <1% YOUNGER YOUTH 11%

<1% 8.4%

10%

YOUNG ADULTS

5.5%

<1%

16%

13%

10.5%

12%

11%

10.5% 20%

6% 16%

16.5%

15% 9%

11%

9.5%

12%

11%

14%

TA 1: SURSUM CORDA

TA 2: GREENLEAF

TA 3: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS

TA 4: LANGSTON DWELLINGS

TA 5: KENILWORTH

TA 6: LINCOLN HEIGHTS/ RICHARDSON DWELLINGS

TA 7: BENNING TERRACE

TA 8: WOODLAND TERRACE

TA 9: WASHINGTON HIGHLANDS

NON-TARGET AREA

Ŧ This figure does not include participation for drop-in programming such as DCPL and Department of Mental Health drop-in programs, DPR pool visits and the DC Free Summer Meals Program.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

WORKING TOWARD CITYWIDE GOALS

THROUGH PROGRAMS AND EVENTS

There were a wide variety of summer programs and

area exceeds the total number of unique young people.

community events sponsored by District government

(In other words, they are counted here as participating in

agencies and CBOs that aligned with the OCSI goals and

a goal area, not a unique program.)

operated in the nine target areas. PROGRAMS were defined as organized and coordinated activities that

The data in Table 3 shows the number of children and

occurred for at least five days (consecutively or non-con-

youth engaged in programming that supported a par-

secutively). EVENTS were one-time, short-term activities

ticular goal. It also shows the number of programs and

held in neighborhoods across the city that provided fun

events offered in each goal area. In terms of PROGRAMS,

activities for young people, resources and information

Goal 1, Workforce Development, had the most youth par-

for families, and community-building opportunities for

ticipants, 11,976 due to the large number of older youth

all residents. DROP-IN PROGRAMMING was defined as

participating in DOESâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s DC Summer Youth Employment

repeated, structured activities that allowed for youth to

Program (SYEP). Goal 5, Strengthening Families, had the

drop-in and participate.

fewest program participants. This goal was met primarily through events, direct outreach in Target Areas, and

Programming for OCSI was driven by the five citywide

by the addition of a family component to agency- and

goals of workforce development, academic achievement,

CBO-sponsored youth programs. Most of the partici-

healthy lifestyles, safety and structure, and strengthening

pation in the EVENTS category occurred around Goals

families. Programs and events provided by agencies and

3 and 4, Healthy Lifestyles and Safety and Structure.

CBOs could work towards more than one youth goal. This

DROP-IN PROGRAMMING experienced the highest

has important implications for the data. First, the number

levels of youth participation in Goals 2 and 3, Academic

of programs and events in each goal area exceeds the

Achievement and Healthy Lifestyles.

total number of unique programs and events. Also, the number of children and youth participating in each goal

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

Table 3: Participation in OCSI 2013 Programming and Events by Goal AreaŦ PROGRAMS

EVENTS

DROP-IN PROGRAMMING

NUMBER OF DUPLICATED YOUTH PARTICIPANTS

NUMBER OF DUPLICATED PROGRAMS

NUMBER OF DUPLICATED YOUTH PARTICIPANTS

NUMBER OF DUPLICATED EVENTS

NUMBER OF DUPLICATED YOUTH PARTICIPANTS

NUMBER OF DUPLICATED DROP-IN PROGRAMS

Goal 1: Workforce Development

11,976

6,313

–

Goal 2: Academic Achievement

4,724

8,149

152

5,453

Goal 3: Healthy Lifestyles

5,600

28,478

314

1,073

Goal 4: Safety and Structure

5,484

17,971

217

3,104

Goal 5: Strengthening Families

1,097

13,280

100

301

TOTAL

28,881

289

74,191

881

9,931

168

GOAL

Ŧ This does not include the DC Free Summer Meals Program and DPR pool visits

OVERVIEW OF PROGRAMS More than 19,600 unique children and youth participated in agency or CBO-operated programs that aimed to achieve one or more of the citywide goals. OCSI programs took place across the District, and some programs (such as SYEP and DPR-operated programs) occurred in multiple sites across the District. The following figures show the breakdown of all program participation by goal, youth age group and target area. Note that because programs could offer multiple goals, youth participation in this section is a measure of participation in a goal area, not in a unique program. As a result, the total number of “participants” exceeds the total number of unique youth. Figure 2 illustrates the breakdown of participation in programs by goals and age category. Older youth and

Programs aligned with Goal 1,

Workforce Development, had the most youth participants,

11,976.

young adults were most heavily represented in Goal 1, Workforce Development, because of high participation

middle school youth program availability and participa-

in the Summer Youth Employment Program (SYEP).

tion in DCPS’s K–8 Summer School program. The high

Younger youth represent the largest age group in Goal

number of younger youth participating in Goal 3, Healthy

2, Academic Achievement, because of elementary and

Lifestyles, reflected high participation in DPR programs.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

600

400

200

FIGURE 2:

Figure 2: OCSI 2013 Participation in Programs by Goal and Youth Age Group YOUNGER YOUTH (5–12)

OLDER YOUTH (13–18)

YOUNG ADULTS (19–24)

N/A

NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

GOAL 1: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

GOAL 2: ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

GOAL 3: HEALTHY LIFESTYLES

GOAL 4: SAFETY AND STRUCTURE

GOAL 5: STRENGTHENING FAMILIES

When program goals are analyzed by target area,

was highest in programs geared toward Goals 3 and 4,

we see that programs supporting Goal 1, Workforce

Healthy Lifestyles and Safety and Structure. Figure 3

Development, had the highest levels of participation

shows the breakdown of participation in programs in the

across the target areas. Exceptions are Target Areas 5 and

target areas by goals. Non-Target area programs are not

7 where most participants were in Academic-focused

illustrated in the figure.

programs and Target Areas 8 and 9 where participation

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

500

400

300

200

100

2000

Figure 3: OCSI 2013 Participation in Programs by Target Area and Goal

TA 1: SURSUM CORDA

GOAL 1: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOAL 2: ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

TA 2: GREENLEAF

GOAL 3: HEALTHY LIFESTYLES GOAL 4: SAFETY AND STRUCTURE

TA 3: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS

GOAL 5: STRENGTHENING FAMILIES

TA 4: LANGSTON DWELLINGS

TA 6: LINCOLN HEIGHTS/ RICHARDSON DWELLINGS

TA 7: BENNING TERRACE

TA 8: WOODLAND TERRACE

TA 9: WASHINGTON HIGHLANDS

500

2000

NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

2500

300

200

100

1500

1000

2000

1500

500

1000

TA 5: KENILWORTH

OVERVIEW OF EVENTS The 441 government- and CBO-sponsored events engaged 33,967 children, youth and adults. Events included community street fairs, workshops, and evening OCSI outreach events in the target areas. It should be noted that this is a duplicated count of young people, as they could participate in more than one event as well as a combination of programs and events. More than half of the events were new in 2013 and included outings to sporting events, performing arts shows, and health and wellness outreach activities. See Appendix G online for a list of planned evening outreach events and Appendix J online for a list of all community events submitted to One City Youth website. Agencies and CBOs hosted additional targeted events across the District. Most of the events focused on Goals 3 and 4, Healthy Lifestyles and Safety and Structure. This was largely because DPR and MPD sponsored more events than any other agencies using mobile activities such as Beat the

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

Streets, movie nights, Fun Wagons, and skate mobiles to provide fun, interactive events for youth in neighborhoods with few facilities or open spaces. Also worthy of note: »» Although community events targeted all ages, the focus was on older youth, young adults and families. Specifically, of the 441 events, 164 (37%) focused on older youth and young adults, and 175 (40%) targeted whole families. »» About 70% of the events focused on the Safety and Healthy Lifestyles goals. »» Target Area evening outreach events comprised 40% of the total 441 events. »» OCSI featured a kick-off event at the parking lot at RFK stadium to highlight the agency summer programs available to DC residents. This year, OCSI teamed up with Truck Touch hosted by the Department of Public Works (DPW). The kick-off

Of the 441 community events, 164 (37%) focused on older youth and young adults, and 175 (40%) targeted families. event drew over 5,000 children, youth and families.

hosted pool visits, and the Office of State Superintendent

District agencies staffed tables and gave out informa-

for Education coordinated the summer meals program.

tion about services and program offerings, while child

While individualized data on these drop-in programs was

and youth-focused performers entertained the crowd.

difficult to collect due to the nature of the programming, the aggregated data shows that they advanced the goals

Table 2 shows events by target areas and Table 3 shows

of Academic Achievement and Healthy Lifestyles for

events by goal. Note that the data is duplicated because

thousands of youth. Further data highlighting these pro-

events can have multiple goals.

grams is shown below and in the agency-specific section.

OVERVIEW OF DROP-IN PROGRAMS

Almost 6,800 youth participated in 66 available drop-in programs operated by DCPL and DMH. Figures 4 and 5

The third form of programming, drop-in programming,

show the breakdown of participation in drop-in programs

also exposed young people to activities targeting

by age group and target area. Non-Target area drop-in

the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s five youth goals. DC Public Library and the

programs are not illustrated in these figures. Again,

Department of Mental Health offered drop-in program-

because drop-in programs can have multiple goals, the

ming through their summer reading and health programs

participation numbers are duplicated.

respectively. The Department of Parks and Recreation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

FIGURE 4:

Figure 4: One City Summer Initiative 2013 Goals for Drop-In Programs by Youth AgeŦ YOUNGER YOUTH (5–12)

OLDER YOUTH (13–18)

YOUNG ADULTS (19–24)

N/A

3500

NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS

3000

2500 2000

1500

1000

500

GOAL 1: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT Ŧ

GOAL 2: ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

GOAL 3: HEALTHY LIFESTYLES

This does not include the DC Free Summer Meals Program and DPR pool visits.

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

GOAL 4: SAFETY AND STRUCTURE

GOAL 5: STRENGTHENING FAMILIES

500

400

300

200

100

Figure 5: OCSI 2013 Participation in Drop-in Programs by Target Area and GoalŦ

GOAL 1: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

TA 1: SURSUM CORDA

GOAL 2: ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT GOAL 3: HEALTHY LIFESTYLES GOAL 4: SAFETY AND STRUCTURE

TA 2: GREENLEAF

GOAL 5: STRENGTHENING FAMILIES

Ŧ This does not include the Summer Meal program and DPR Pool Visits. There were no OCSI drop-in programs held in Target Areas 3, 5 and 8 (Columbia Heights, Kenilworth, and Woodland Terrace).

TA 4: LANGSTON DWELLINGS

TA 6: LINCOLN HEIGHTS/ RICHARDSON DWELLINGS

TA 7: BENNING TERRACE

TA 9: WASHINGTON HIGHLANDS

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

DISTRICT AGENCIES’ & CBOS’ PARTICIPATION DISTRICT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES’ OCSI PARTICIPATION Government agencies were required to develop programs that aligned with the five citywide summer goals. Twenty-seven government agencies participated in OCSI 2013 through planning meetings, programming citywide and in the target areas and distributing resources at community and evening outreach events. These agencies provided programming to over 80% of the total OCSI participants in programs (19,622 unique children and youth). In addition, a total of 67 agencies employed 4,738 youth, or 42% of the total SYEP youth, extending the number of agencies involved in OCSI and its youth development goals. Finally, government agencies also provided space for community-based organizations for site operation. The major youth-serving agencies in the District government—DCPL, DCPS, DMH, DOES, DPR, MPD, and OSSE— provided a variety of programs and activities including summer camps, enrichment activities, summer school, summer jobs/career exploration and sports camps. Table 4 presents information about their summer programming.

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

87% of participants in DCPL programming

were between the ages of 13–16.

52% of participants in DMH programming

were between the ages of 19–24.

Table 4: OCSI 2013 Summer Programming Operated by Select DC Government Agencies—Goals, Youth, Sites, and Programs

AGENCY

MAIN GOAL

MAIN ACTIVITIES

TOTAL NUMBER OF YOUTH

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOST SITES

TOTAL NUMBER OF PROGRAMS

DC Public Schools

Goal 2: Academic Achievement

K–8 Summer School Program

1,734

Department of Employment Services

Goal 1: Workforce Development

Summer Youth Employment Program

11,247

434

Department of Parks and Recreation

Goal 3: Healthy Lifestyles

Summer Camps

2,859

Metropolitan Police Department

Goal 4: Safety and Youth Outreach Structure Programs

118

TOTAL DUPLICATED YOUTH, PROGRAM AND SITES

15,958

505

DC Public Library

Goal 2: Academic Achievement

Summer Reading Programs

5,615

Department of Mental Health

Goal 3: Healthy Lifestyles

Healthy Lifestyle Programs

1,160

6,775

–

357

TOTAL DUPLICATED YOUTH, DROP-IN PROGRAM AND SITES

Office of the State Superintendent of Education

Goal 3: Healthy Lifestyles

DC Free Summer Meals Program

DC PUBLIC LIBRARY OCSI PARTICIPATION

DC PUBLIC SCHOOLS OCSI PARTICIPATION

DCPL provided summer enrichment activities to 5,615

As part of OCSI, the DCPS K–8 summer school program

youth in 39 drop-in programs at 22 sites. A total of 84

operated in eight open sites, exposing 1,734 youth

drop-in sessions were provided as many of the drop-in

to Goal 2, Academic Achievement. Of these students,

programs were offered multiple times throughout the

1,536 were enrolled in elementary school and 198 were

summer. The majority of DCPL programs focused on

enrolled in middle school. In addition, 1,395 students

Goal 2, Academic Achievement. Of the participants, 87%

participated in the high school summer school program,

were between the ages of 13 and 16 years. The remaining

876 students participated in the Extended School Year

youth were younger, between the ages of 5 and 12 years.

(ESY) program, 94 participated in the Lindamood Bell

Young people took in performances, engaged in interac-

program91for struggling readers, and over 1,000 rising

tive, creative programming, explored career options and

9th graders participated in a summer bridge program.

visited with mentors. DC Public Library hosted kick-off

Finally, DCPS hosted 653 SYEP youth, about 6% of the

and finale events for their summer reading program that

total SYEP participants.

drew 300 youth citywide. DCPL also hosted 65 SYEP participants at various branches. Lastly, DCPL served 9,455 summer meals to youth through the DC Free Summer Meals Program.

9 http://www.lindamoodbell.com/

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH

Furthermore, 12,896 attended the mandatory orientation

OCSI PARTICIPATION

session (their first in-person confirmation of their intent to

DMH provided summer enrichment activities to 1,160

work with us). A smaller number, 11,440 youth, were actu-

youth in 27 drop-in programs at 16 sites, with a major-

ally paid for time worked at any point during the summer

ity focused on Goal 3, Healthy Lifestyles. Many of these

and only 11,247 youth (75% of the total certified eligible

drop-in programs had multiple sessions that targeted the

youth) worked at least 5 days during the program and

same youth weekly through the month of July. Of the par-

were included in the participation and outcome analysis

ticipants in DMH programs, 52% were between the ages

of this report. Youth worked an average of 24 days during

of 19 and 24 years. The remaining youth were older youth

the SYEP program.

between the ages of 13 and 18. Young people engaged in activities that increased their knowledge and skills around

These young adults worked at 434 host sites across the

bullying prevention, healthy relationships, conflict resolu-

city. The breakdown of organization types that hosted

tion and anger management. The Department of Mental

youth were:

Health also hosted 62 SYEP participants. »» District government agencies: 4,738 (42%) DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT

»» Community-based organizations: 3,782 (34%)

SERVICES OCSI PARTICIPATION

»» Private organizations: 1,160 (10%)

Acceptance in the Summer Youth Employment Program

»» Charter schools: 1,057 (9%)

is a multi-step process. More than 20,000 young people

»» Federal government agencies: 510 (5%)

signed up and of these youth, 14,927 were certified as eligible and had job positions made available to them. Figure 6: SYEP Youth Placements

5% 9%

DISTRICT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS

10%

PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS 42%

CHARTER SCHOOLS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

34%

11,247 total

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

DC Public Library, DC public charter schools, the National

OCSI PARTICIPATION

Youth Sports Program, faith-based organizations, and

DPR supported the One City Summer Initiative in five

community-based organizations. More than 1,293,300

ways. First, the agency served 2,589 youth in 18 pro-

meals were served to District children and youths through

grams at 60 sites, primarily exposing them to Healthy

age 18 during the 10-week period, including weekends.

Lifestyles (Goal 3). A majority of the youth served were

This equates to an estimated 18,744 meals served daily.

younger youth who participated in summer camps such

The children and youth served are not represented in the

as Little Explorers, Discovery, and Tween; all of the camps

table since the data was aggregated and could not be

offered life skills and recreation activities. The second way

scrubbed for duplication. Regardless, the summer meals

DPR supported OCSI was by hosting 1,336 SYEP youth

program was a central element of the Healthy Lifestyles

across its facilities and offices. In addition, DPR served

goal, Goal 3.

448,233 summer meals and, as such, was the largest single provider of meals through the DC Free Summer

OTHER AGENCY OCSI PARTICIPATION

Meals Program. Fourth, DPR supported 147,376 pool vis-

Other agencies participated in OCSI by hosting youth

its. Lastly, DPR also hosted and participated in 37 OCSI

through DOESâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Summer Youth Employment Program

events, exposing connection 6,884 youth and families to

and providing events and outreach events in the target

community-based resources.

area. A total of 67 District government agencies hosted 4,738 SYEP youth. Table 5 shows the number of SYEP

METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT

youth hosted by each agency.

OCSI PARTICIPATION In addition to managing the crime prevention and suppression efforts citywide and, in particular, in the

Table 5: Number of Summer Youth Employment Program Participants by all DC Government Agencies

four Summer Crime Initiative areas, the police department engaged 118 young people in four programs at three sites; all targeting Goal 4, Safety and Structure. These youth participated in S.T.A.R.S. (work and life skills) and other structured Summer Fun activities. The Metropolitan Police Department also hosted over 140 OCSI events, exposing nearly 15,000 children, youth and families to community-based resources. Finally, MPD hosted 103 young people through the Summer Youth Employment Program. OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF

DISTRICT AGENCY

NUMBER OF SYEP YOUTH HOSTED

Advisory Neighborhood Commission

Bank on DC

Council of the District of Columbia

Criminal Justice Coordinating Council

DC Board of Elections

DC Child and Family Services Agency

DC Commission on the Arts and Humanities

DC Congressional Delegation

DC Council - Office of Councilmember Marion Barry

EDUCATION OCSI PARTICIPATION The District of Columbiaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Free Summer Meals Program is funded by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) through the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE). Numerous public and private agencies and organizations implement it, including the Department of Parks and Recreation, DC Public Schools,

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

DISTRICT AGENCY

NUMBER OF SYEP YOUTH HOSTED

DISTRICT AGENCY

NUMBER OF SYEP YOUTH HOSTED

DC Courts

Department of Parks and Recreation

1336

DC Housing Authority

190

Department of Public Works

120

DC Mayor's Office on Asian and Pacific Islander Affairs

Department of the Environment

287

DC National Guard

Department of Transportation

128

DC Office on Aging

Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services

DC Public Library

Executive Office of the Mayor

DC Public Schools

653

Executive Office of the Mayor Office on Latino Affairs

DC Public Service Commission

Fire and Emergency Medical Services

DC Taxicab Commission

DC Youth Advisory Council

Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency

Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs

Metropolitan Police Department

103

Office of Cable Television

Department of Corrections

Office of Disability Rights

Department of Disability Services

Office of Human Rights

Department of Employment Services

610

Department of General Services

154

Office of Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining

Department of Health

Office of Motion Picture and Television Development

Department of Health Care Finance

Office of Planning

Department of Housing and Community Development

Office of Policy and Legislative Affairsâ&#x20AC;&#x201D; EOM

Department of Human Resources

Office of Risk Management

Department of Human Services

Office of the Attorney General

Department of Insurance, Securities and Banking

Office of the Chief Financial Officer

Department of Mental Health

Office of the Chief Medical Examiner

Department of Motor Vehicles

Office of the Chief Technology Officer

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

DISTRICT AGENCY

NUMBER OF SYEP YOUTH HOSTED

Office of the Deputy Mayor for Education

Office of the Deputy Mayor for Health and Human Services

Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development

Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development—WIC

Office of the Inspector General

Office of the Secretary

Office of the State Superintendent of Education

TRUST-FUNDED COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS’ OCSI PARTICIPATION During OCSI 2013, the Trust funded 97 nonprofit community-based organizations to work with 3,874 youth. (Appendix H online lists the grantees.) Funding priority was given to those organizations whose programming would be located in one or more of the target areas. Community-based organizations offered a variety of programs including arts, sports, academic enrichment, and technology. While many CBOs ran programs at their own sites, others operated in DC government agency sites through partnerships facilitated by the Trust. Government agency hosts included the DC Housing Authority, DC Public Schools, and Department of Parks and Recreation. As previously mentioned, all Trust-funded organizations were required to work toward at least one of the five OCSI

Office of the State Superintendent of Education Scholars Program

Office of the Tenant Advocate

Office of Unified Communications

Office of Veterans Affairs

Office of Zoning

University of the District of Columbia

132

citywide goals so the youth participation and number of programs by goal area exceeds the total number of unique participants and programs. As shown in Table 6, Goals 2, 3, and 4 had the most participants and programs.

Table 6: CSI 2013 Trust-funded Youth Participation and Programs by Goal Area GOAL

NUMBER OF DUPLICATED YOUTH PARTICIPANTS

NUMBER OF DUPLICATED PROGRAMS

Goal 1: Workforce Development

634

Goal 2: Academic Achievement

2,943

Goal 3: Healthy Lifestyles

2,653

Goal 4: Safety

2,502

Goal 5: Strengthening Families

1,003

TOTAL DUPLICATED

9,735

236

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

2013 ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

FINDINGS

CHARACTERISTICS OF YOUTH SURVEY RESPONDENTS Twenty-two percent, or 4,311, of the 19,622 children and youth involved with one or more summer program completed the OCSI youth post survey (youth survey). For a

»» Over half of the youth (56%) percent reported participating in the program two or more years.

LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES AND SATISFACTION OUTCOMES

population size of over 10,000, an adequate sample size

The statement “In the summer program I got a chance

is 350. Analysis of this subgroup of respondents showed

to…” was used to assess the number and percentage

similar representation of the total youth population with

of youth who responded to having had an opportunity

respect to age, ward of residence and race of the youth.

to learn, do or try a particular thing. The answers were

Therefore, the findings from the survey can also be repre-

scaled: “A lot,” “A little,” and “Not at all.” Those who

sentative of the entire OCSI youth participant population.

responded “A lot” were considered to have strongly

(See Appendix L online for complete survey results.)

engaged in the learning opportunity. The response rate

for each listed learning opportunity was approximately Basic data about OCSI survey respondents participating in programs and events includes: »» More females than males participated in the survey, 55% and 45%, respectively. »» Just over half, 55%, of respondents were older youth and young adults. »» Sixty-two percent of the respondents came from

58% of youth reported that summer programs

gave them a chance to try new things.

Wards 5, 7, and 8 combined.

63% of youth 10 Carol Fitz-Gibbon and Lynn Morris (1987), How to design a program evaluation, Sage Publications.

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

always liked attending.

reported they

FIGURE FIGURE 6: 6: 95%. The vast majority of the youth survey respondents

Overall, youth expressed satisfaction with the program

(58%) stated they had the chance to try new things and

or programs they attended; only 3% said they never

47% had a chance to go new places. Interestingly, 36%

felt like attending the program(s) and only 6% reported

of youth reported they talked with adults about current

they would not recommend the program to a friend. By

life events. A lower number of youth responded “A lot” to

contrast, 63% claimed to always like attending and 73%

having the opportunity to work at a job they liked, which

reported they would recommend it to a friend.

is not surprising as many younger youth are not exposed

to jobs, but rather to job skills. Among the older youth

Figure 7 shows the results of the youth’s perception

and young adults, the age groups that were exposed to

of learning opportunities provided and satisfaction

jobs, almost 50% responded “A lot.”

with the programming. (See Appendix L online for full

FIGURE 6: survey results.)

Figure 7: Learning Opportunities and Satisfaction Reported by Children and Youth (unduplicated)Ŧ

LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES A LOT

3000

NOT AT ALL

NO RESPONSE

64%

NUMBER OF RESPONSES

2000

58% 47%

2500

35%

1500

38%

36% 35% 30%

38%

29% 24%

1000

17% 500

TRY NEW THINGS

GO TO NEW PLACES

MAKE FRIENDS

TALK WITH ADULTS ABOUT WHAT’S GOING ON IN MY LIFE

WORK AT A JOB THAT I LIKED

SATISFACTION 3500 3500

3000 3000

ALWAYS

63%

3000 3000

SOMETIMES

2500 2500

1500 1500

NEVER 34%

NO RESPONSE

1000 1000 3000

NUMBER OF RESPONSES

2000 2000

NUMBER OF RESPONSES

A LITTLE

500500

2500 2500

NO RESPONSE

1500 1500

1000 1000

22% 3500

500500

LIKE COMING TO 2500 PROGRAM

MAYBE

2000 2000

3% 2000 0

YES

73%

5%3000 2000 RECOMMEND PROGRAM TO A FRIEND

2500

Ŧ These numbers represent1500 the number and percent who responded to each question.

FINDINGS1500 FROM SUMMER 2013 1000

1000

ONE CITY SUMMER 2013 YOUTH OUTCOMES TOWARD CITYWIDE GOALS The youth survey was developed to measure four of the five OCSI goals (See Appendix D online for the Goals Matrix.) As mentioned, the five youth- and family-related goals undergirding OCSI 2013 were: »» GOAL 1: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: Young people will gain meaningful work and career exposure, experience, and skills. »» GOAL 2: ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT:

»» GOAL 5: STRENGTHENING FAMILIES: Children, youth and families will have opportunities to strengthen their family. Analysis of Goal 5, Strengthening Families, is not included in this section of the report as most of the OCSI programs focused on the other four goals. The answers to the survey were scaled: “A lot,” “A little,” and “Not at all.” The following sections provide youth outcome findings by goal area and age group. The discussion of outcomes by goal area focuses on responses of “A lot,” as those responses were considered the strongest

Children and youth will increase their academic

expression of progress toward outcomes. Figures 9, 10

knowledge and skills and increase their chance of

and 11 present all responses by age group.

academic advancement. »» GOAL 3: HEALTHY LIFESTYLES: Children and youth will increasingly adopt healthy lifestyles. »» GOAL 4: SAFETY AND STRUCTURE: Children and youth will have a safe summer.

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

Please note that fifty-three youth did not provide their age, therefore they are not included in the following analysis. Of the remaining total of 4,258 youth, 1,909 were younger youth, 1,928 were older youth and 421 were young adults.

GOAL 1: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES OLDER YOUTH: WORKFORCE To measure workforce development outcomes, the survey used statements and asked the youth to select the appropriate scaled response. The statements were:

DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES Over 80% of older youth reported participating in SYEP and/or a job, both targeting Goal 1. Participation in these programs led to 57% of older youth reporting that they can talk about careers they are interested in, 56% of older

»» “After participating in the summer pro-

youth learning the skills needed for employment and 61%

gram, I can talk about careers that I am

now knowing the steps that they need for employment.

interested in.”

Also, 61% of older youth responded they were “Very Sure”

»» “After participating in the summer program,

they would be able to find a job that they enjoy and 82%

I know the steps needed to reach my

responded they were “Very Sure” they would be able to

career goals.”

do well in a job they have.

»» “After participating in the summer program, I know the skills needed for employment

YOUNG ADULTS: WORKFORCE

(ex. resumes, time management).”

DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES Over 80% of young adults responded that they worked at a job this summer, with many of these youth participating in SYEP. Almost 65% of the young adults reported that

YOUNGER YOUTH: WORKFORCE

these experiences helped them to talk about careers they

DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

are interested in and know the skills needed for employ-

Less than 5% of younger youth reported engaging in

ment. In addition, 66% of young adults responded that

workforce development activities including SYEP and/

they now knew the steps needed for employment. Also,

or having a job. However, through other programming,

over 75% of the young adult respondents were sure that

almost 50% of the younger youth reported that they

they would be able to find a job they enjoy and also do

could talk about careers they are interested in (47%) and

well in a job they have.

know the skills needed for employment (42%). Also, over 80% of younger youth responded they were “Very Sure” they would be able to find a job that they enjoy and 83% responded they were “Very Sure” they would be able to do well in a job they have.

Over 80%

of young adults responded that they

worked at a job this summer, with many of these youth participating in SYEP.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

GOAL 2: ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OUTCOMES responded they were “Very Sure” they would finish high The young people were also asked about gaining academic knowledge and learning skills through participation in the summer programs. The following statements were used to measure academic outcomes: »» “After participating in the summer program,

school, and 80% responded they were “Very Sure” they would finish college. Furthermore, 55% of younger youth reported better understanding the importance of going to college. OLDER YOUTH: ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OUTCOMES

I better understand the importance of

With regard to academic skills, only about 30% of older

going to college.”

youth responded that through the program(s) they

»» “After participating in the summer program,

learned to read and write better and improve their

I know the steps needed to go to college

math and science skills. In the case of computers and

(ex. SAT/ACT, admissions, FAFSA).”

technology, 40% reported that their skills had improved.

»» “After participating in the summer program,

However, 92% of older youth stated their summer pro-

I can name at least two supports and/or

gram helped them learn where to go if they needed help

resources that will help me go to college.”

in school. Also, 92% responded they were “Very Sure”

»» “In the summer program, I have learned how to read and write better.”

they would finish high school, and 80% responded they were “Very Sure” they would finish college. Furthermore,

»» “In the summer program, I have learned

67% of older youth reported better understanding the

how to be better at math and science.”

importance of going to college after participating in the

»» “In the summer program, I have

summer program.

learned how to use computers and technology better.” »» “In the summer program, I have learned where to go if I need help in school.”

YOUNG ADULTS: ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OUTCOMES With regard to academic skills, only about 36% of Young Adults responded that through the program(s) they learned to read and write better and improved their

YOUNGER YOUTH: ACADEMIC

math and science skills. In the case of computers and

ACHIEVEMENT OUTCOMES

technology, 42% reported that their skills had improved.

About 20% of survey respondents reported participating

Over 70% of the young adult respondents were confident

in summer school or library programs, both targeting

that they would finish college and 68% of young adults

academic achievement outcomes. With regard to aca-

reported better understanding the importance of going

demic skills, about 50% of younger youth responded that

to college. Also, 58% of young adults reported that after

through the program(s) they learned to read and write

participating in the program they are able to identify sup-

better and improve their math and science skills. In the

ports and resources that will help them to go college and

case of computers and technology, 49% reported that

60% reported knowing the steps needed to go to college.

their skills had improved. Fifty-four percent of younger youth stated their summer program helped them learn where to go if they needed help in school. Also, 83%

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

GOAL 3: HEALTHY LIFESTYLES OUTCOMES make good decisions about nutrition (68%), and lower Nine scaled statements were used to measure healthy lifestyles outcomes: »» “The summer program has helped me to be motivated to learn new things.”

number reported learning how to engage physical activity (43%). Lastly, 71% of younger youth responded that the program taught them how to say “no” to alcohol or drugs and 72% responded they learned how to resist negative peer pressure.

»» “The summer program has helped me to feel happy with myself.” »» “The summer program has helped me to feel positive about my future.” »» “The summer program has helped me

OLDER YOUTH: HEALTHY LIFESTYLES OUTCOMES Over 50% (55%) of older youth reported their programs helped them be motivated to learn new things. In addi-

to be healthier (ex. eat better and exer-

tion, over two-thirds of the older youth (68%) reported

cise more).”

feeling positive about their future and feeling happy with

»» “In the summer program, I have learned

themselves (60%). A lower number of older youth reported

how to make good choices about the

learning how to make good decisions about nutrition

foods I eat.”

(39%), but 46% of older youth reported learning how

»» “In the summer program, I have learned

to engage in physical activity. Lastly, 55% of older youth

how to do physical activities that I like.”

responded the program taught them how to say “no” to

»» “In the summer program, I have learned

alcohol or drugs; however, only about 50% responded they

how to deal with stress.”

learned to how to resist negative peer pressure.

»» “In the summer program, I have learned how to resist negative peer pressure.” »» “In the summer program, I have learned

YOUNG ADULTS: HEALTHY LIFESTYLES OUTCOMES

how to say “no” to alcohol, drugs, and

Almost 60% of young adults reported their programs

other things that are not good for me.”

helped them be motivated to learn new things. Twothirds of young adults also reported feeling positive about their future and currently feeling happy with

YOUNGER YOUTH: HEALTHY

themselves. About 45% of young adults reported learn-

LIFESTYLES OUTCOMES

ing how to make good decisions about nutrition, and

A high number of younger youth (71%) reported their

47% of young adults reported learning how to engage in

program(s) helped them be motivated to learn new

physical activity. Lastly, 57% of young adults responded

things. In addition, about two-thirds of the younger

that the program taught them how to say “no” to alcohol

youth (66%) reported feeling positive about their future

or drugs; however, about 52% responded they learned to

and feeling happy with themselves (68%). Over two-

how to resist negative peer pressure.

thirds of the younger youth reported learning how to

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

GOAL 4: SAFETY AND STRUCTURE OUTCOMES OLDER YOUTH: SAFETY AND Five statements were used to measure youth safety and structure outcomes. The statements included: »» “After participating in the summer program, I better understand the importance of helping others in my community.” »» “After participating in the summer program, I know the different rules and laws in my community.” »» “In the summer program, I have learned how to respect people who are different from me.” »» “In the summer program, I have learned how to share my ideas with others.” »» “In the summer program, I have learned how to deal with my feelings in a proper way.”

STRUCTURE OUTCOMES Older youth reported that they gained conflict resolution skills such as respecting others who were different from them (57%) and learning how to share ideas with others (50%). Furthermore, older youth reported a deeper appreciation for community service (53%) and an awareness of the laws and regulations governing their community (51%). In addition, 79% of the older youth expressed “Always” feeling safe at the summer program they attended. YOUNG ADULTS: SAFETY AND STRUCTURE OUTCOMES Young adults reported that they gained conflict resolution skills such as respecting others who were different from them (58%) and learning how to share ideas with others (52%). Furthermore, Young Adults reported a deeper appreciation for community service (63%) and an awareness of the laws and regulations governing their

YOUNGER YOUTH: SAFETY AND

community (59%). In addition, almost 80% of the young

STRUCTURE OUTCOMES

adults expressed “Always” feeling safe at the summer pro-

More than 50% of the younger youth reported prog-

gram they attended.

ress in safety and structure outcomes. Specifically, 54% reported that they gained conflict resolution skills such as respecting others who were different from them and dealing with feelings appropriately. Furthermore, younger youth reported a deeper appreciation for community service (58%) and an awareness of the laws and regulations governing their community (51%). In addition, over 70% expressed that they “Always” felt safe at the summer program they attended.

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

SURVEY RESPONSES BY AGE GROUP Figure 7: Youth Outcomes for Younger Youth YOUTH OUTCOMES

RESPONSE A LOT

A LITTLE

NOT AT ALL

Workforce Development Skills Needed for Employment

42%

Careers Interested In

47%

Steps to Reach Career Goals

25%

34%

22%

31%

33%

37%

30%

Academic Achievement 55%

Understand Importance of College 34%

Steps Needed to go to College

38%

28% 41%

Supports and Resources for College

21%

24%

32%

27% 54%

Read and Write Better Better at Math and Science

48%

Use Computers and Technology

49%

25%

27%

28%

23%

54%

Where to Go if Need Help in School

19%

27%

21%

25%

Healthy Lifestyles Motivated to Learn New Things

71%

Feel Happy With Myself

68%

Positive About Future

66%

Be Healthier

61%

Good Food Decisions

67%

22% 24% 25% 27% 24%

43%

Do Physical Activities

72%

12% 9%

16%

12%

71%

Say No to Alcohol and Drugs

18%

29%

Resist Negative Peer Pressure

27%

30% 53%

Deal with Stress

22%

Safety and Structure 58%

Important of Helping Others

29%

51%

Know Rules and Laws

17%

32% 65%

Respecting Others

13%

24%

11%

Share Ideas with Others

54%

32%

14%

Deal with Feelings Appropriately

54%

31%

14%

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

100

Figure 8: Youth Outcomes for Older Youth YOUTH OUTCOMES

RESPONSE A LOT

A LITTLE

NOT AT ALL

Workforce Development Skills Needed for Employment

56%

Careers Interested In

36% 28%

57%

Steps to Reach Career Goals

61%

36%

31%

Academic Achievement 67%

Understand Importance of College

26%

55%

Steps Needed to go to College

39%

31% 40%

Use Computers and Technology

30%

33%

30%

Better at Math and Science

13%

35%

37%

Read and Write Better

11%

34%

52%

Supports and Resources for College

29%

31%

Where to Go if Need Help in School

92%

7% 1%

37%

32%

Healthy Lifestyles 55%

Motivated to Learn New Things

60%

Feel Happy With Myself

68%

Positive About Future

26% 6%

45%

Be Healthier 39%

Good Food Decisions

40%

Deal with Stress

29%

32% 46%

Do Physical Activities

19%

36%

49%

Resist Negative Peer Pressure

25%

34%

26% 20%

31% 55%

Say No to Alcohol and Drugs

29%

23%

22%

Safety and Structure 53%

Important of Helping Others

51%

Know Rules and Laws

57%

Respecting Others 50%

Share Ideas with Others

0 DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

13%

30%

13%

33%

10%

36%

35%

46%

Deal with Feelings Appropriately

37%

15% 21%

100

Figure 9: Youth Outcomes for Young Adults YOUTH OUTCOMES

RESPONSE A LOT

A LITTLE

NOT AT ALL

Workforce Development Skills Needed for Employment

64%

29%

Careers Interested In

64%

29%

Steps to Reach Career Goals

66%

28% 6%

Academic Achievement 68%

Understand Importance of College

23%

60%

Steps Needed to go to College

27%

13%

30%

12%

58%

Supports and Resources for College 38%

Read and Write Better

34%

28%

33%

Better at Math and Science

43%

24%

Use Computers and Technology

42%

Where to Go if Need Help in School

42%

29%

28%

30%

Healthy Lifestyles 59%

Motivated to Learn New Things

32%

Feel Happy With Myself

67%

Positive About Future

67%

23% 26%

56%

Be Healthier

57%

Say No to Alcohol and Drugs

20%

31%

52%

Resist Negative Peer Pressure

24%

29%

49%

Deal with Stress

26%

30%

47%

Do Physical Activities

10%

17%

27%

44%

Good Food Decisions

30%

18%

25%

18%

Safety and Structure 63%

Important of Helping Others

27%

10%

Know Rules and Laws

59%

28%

13%

Respecting Others

58%

30%

12%

52%

Share Ideas with Others

33%

50%

Deal with Feelings Appropriately

32%

15% 18%

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

100

MPD SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE In April 2013, MPD identified areas that had a recent increase in crime (Summer Crime Initiative or SCI areas): »» SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE AREA 1: Edgewood (Ward 5 – PSA 502) »» SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE AREA 2: Trinidad (Ward 5 – PSA 506) »» SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE AREA 3: Kenilworth (Ward 7 – PSA 601) »» SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE AREA 4: Shipley (Ward 8 – PSA 705)

agency for several community walk-throughs in the OCSI areas, which connected residents of the community to a variety of city services beyond police services. MPD’s goal was to reduce violent crimes—primarily homicides and robberies—committed by those under age 18 in the target areas, not by increasing the number of arrests, but by implementing strategies that reduced the number of crimes being committed. These strategies included: »» Increasing MPD’s presence; »» Increasing programs and activities that gave residents

One of the four areas identified overlapped with the

constructive and engaging alternatives to illegal and

target areas (Target Area 5: Kenilworth). (See Appendix K

violent behavior; and

online for SCI Maps.) Targeted police presence and outreach by MPD was conducted in these areas throughout the summer. All the SCI target areas had comparatively

»» Improving quality of life through property repairs and physical upgrades.

high crime rates for specific crimes such as robberies,

OCSI programs, events, and walkthroughs coordinated

burglaries, assaults with a deadly weapon, drug abuse

with MPD’s policing efforts had a positive effect on crime

and trafficking, and domestic violence. The areas also

in the SCI target areas. There were fewer homicides

shared low quality of life characteristics including graffiti,

(-83%), robberies (-50%), and burglaries (-32%) across the

overgrown trees and grass, vacant lots, trash and debris,

four SCI areas.

playgrounds in need of repair, abandoned vehicles,

and blighted vacant properties. MPD served as the lead

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

–83%

–32%

fewer homicides

fewer robberies

–50%

–48%

fewer burglaries

juvenile arrests

MPD'S SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE AREAS

The repetition of the Summer Crime Initiative from year

compared to last year. This summer, overall violent crime

to year has not diminished its efficacy. Indeed, there was

in the SCI’s decreased by 34%.

a 20% reduction in violent crime during the summer of 2011 in the target areas, and in 2012, with four of the five

The strategies for the SCI areas also had an impact on the

target areas covering the same (or parts of the same)

arrest of juvenile offenders in the SCI areas as shown in

areas as the 2011 summer initiative, crime continued to

Table 7. The goal of the Department was to engage area

fall significantly. The Captains and their SCI teams were

youth in constructive activities. While the SCI areas were

able to continue driving down crime again this year. In

smaller in size compared to the prior summer’s initiative,

Summer 2013, three of the four areas were new to the ini-

the majority of juvenile arrests for highlighted categories

tiative, and all four areas saw overall reductions in crime

decreased substantially.

Table 7: Number of Juvenile Arrests in All SCI Areas (Calendar Years 2012 and 2013) ARREST CATEGORY

NUMBER JUVENILE ARRESTS 2012

NUMBER JUVENILE ARRESTS 2013

Aggravated Assault

Burglary

Robbery/Carjacking

Theft from Auto

Narcotic Drug Laws

Release Violations

Other Misdemeanors

Total

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

RECOMMENDATIONS By all accounts, One City Summer Initiative 2013 was a

initiative in the form of funding, sponsorships, jobs

success. Even with these achievements, there is always

and resources.

room for improvement. What follows are recommendations as the OCSI transitions into a year-round initiative to be known as One City Youth Initiative (OCYI). These recommendations come from the data collected in the data templates and youth surveys, input from DC government agency staff via individual interviews, the YACs via focus groups, the Trust staff, and the lessons learned as OCSI

»» Collaborate more effectively with the relevant RaiseDC change networks so as to leverage synergies and more efficiently allocate resources.

PROGRAM OFFERINGS »» Support agencies, specifically those that generally do

2013 was planned and implemented. Further analysis

not directly serve youth, with clearer, more con-

and recommendations of the process and planning will

cise expectations of their agency’s child and youth

be provided in a subsequent report.

programming and, where necessary, provide training and coaching.

PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND COLLABORATION »» Make the OCSI year-round. This would improve opportunities for measurable progress and lasting change. »» Engage more CBOs and other youth and community stakeholders earlier in the summer planning process in order to get buy-in and more accurately align

for programming and expand outreach to other sites and community groups within the targeted PSAs. »» Strengthen the workforce development offerings to provide support for younger youth and families and not just older youth. »» Strengthen older youth and young adult program-

resources to the identified needs of the youth and

ming targeting the academic achievement and

the communities.

healthy lifestyle goals.

»» Early in the process, collaborate with local funders, the business community, and colleges and universities and encourage their meaningful support of the

»» Rely less heavily on DCHA communities as host sites

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

DATA COLLECTION/EVALUATION

FUNDING

»» Develop and implement a citywide data collection

»» Allocate resources so schools can be open to site

and mining system for all government agencies and organizations offering programming for children, youth, and their families that would enable more accurate and comprehensive data capture and analysis. »» Include additional data points such as academic achievement, employment, and attendance in the year-round initiative. »» Implement a longitudinal evaluation of the initia-

CBO-organized and -staffed programs. »» Allocate funds for evaluation. Funding would be used to develop data collection and evaluation tools and processes, staff year-round assessment and evaluation work, and analyze and report data. »» Implement DC One Cards across age groups and the sectors engaged with helping and supporting young people. Funding is required to 1) ensure that all children and youth have access to cards and 2)

tive and youth participants to measure the effect of

purchase the hardware and software for programs to

youth programming and engagement on academic

track usage.

achievement, job/career development, involvement in the criminal justice system, and health outcomes. »» Require District government agencies to track the

COMMUNICATION/MARKETING »» Improve the visibility of the One City Youth initiative

dollars allocated to summer programming, staffing,

via traditional and social media so that the public can

and planning.

better access programming and resources.

»» Fully implement the DC One Card to track youth participation in District agency and CBO programs to reduce double counting and accurately track participation and use of services.

»» Improve information sharing with partners and the community regarding events and programming. »» Streamline the public web portals so as to minimize public confusion as to where to go for what.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

CONCLUSION Children and youth engaged in 2013 OCSI activities had

While making significant progress in these five outcome

positive outcomes ranging from feeling safe in their

areas is difficult to prove in only a six-week period, the

program to feeling positive about the future to increas-

data collected as part of OCSI 2013 helps establish a base-

ing academic and career skills. More than 19,600 unique

line data set for the year-round One City Youth Initiative

children and youth ages 5 to 24 youth participated in 121

(OCYI). The year-round initiative will aim to understand

programs in 602 sites throughout the city; 6,775 dupli-

the long-term effects of year-round programming on

cated children and youth attended 66 drop-in programs,

youth and will be informed by a robust data collection

and almost 34,000 children, youth and families partici-

and analysis system already in development.

pated in community events including evening outreach events in the nine target areas. These programs and

Partners and supporters are already looking forward to

events brought government agencies, CBOs, community

growing the success of the OCSI and starting work on

members and youth together and helped the District

planning for the launch of the year-round One City Youth

move closer to achieving its five citywide youth goals.

Initiative of 2014. This report of initial findings should be used as part of the planning as it identifies both the successes and challenges for OCSI.

WE LOOK FORWARD TO EXPANDING OCSI AND CONTINUING TO INCREASE OUTCOMES FOR YOUTH IN THE DISTRICT.

DC ONE CITY SUMMER INITIATIVE

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013

APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A: OCSI 2013 Participating Agencies APPENDIX B: OCSI 2013 Planning Timeline APPENDIX C: OCSI 2013 Youth Voice Data Collection Tools I. YOUTH VOICE SURVEY II. YOUTH FOCUS GROUP QUESTIONS

APPENDIX D: OCSI 2013 Youth Goals APPENDIX E: Target Area Selection Maps APPENDIX F: OCSI 2013 Young Adult Coordinator Job Description and Application APPENDIX G: OCSI 2013 Evening Outreach Calendar APPENDIX H: Trust-Funded Community-Based Organizations APPENDIX I: OCSI 2013 Data Collection Tools I. DATA TEMPLATE II. YOUTH SURVEY III. YAC FOCUS GROUP QUESTIONS IV. AGENCY FEEDBACK INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

APPENDIX J: OCSI 2013 Events APPENDIX K: MPD Summer Crime Initiative 2013 Maps APPENDIX L: OCSI 2013 Youth Survey Results

APPENDIX A: OCSI 2013 PARTICIPATING AGENCIES

CFSA

Child and Families Services Agency

DCHA

DC Housing Authority

DCOA

DC Office on Aging

DCPL

DC Public Library

DCPS

DC Public Schools

DCRA

Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs

DHS

Department of Human Services

DMH

Department of Mental Health

DOES

Department of Employment Services

DOH

Department of Health

DPW

Department of Public Works

DYRS

Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services

FEMS

Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department

HSEMA

Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency

MPD

Metropolitan Police Department

OAG

Office of the Attorney General

ONE

Office of Neighborhood Engagement

OSSE

Office of the State Superintendent of Education

OVS/JGA

Office of Victim Services/Justice Grants Administration

SERVE DC

Serve DC

UDC

University of the District of Columbia

CYITC

DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

OCTO

Office of Chief Technology Officer

DME

Deputy Mayor for Education

DMPSJ

Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and Justice

DISB

Department of Insurance, Securities, and Banking (Bank on DC division)

DMHHS

Deputy Mayor for Health and Human Services

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

APPENDIX B: OCSI 2013 PLANNING TIMELINE

NOV 2012

DEC 2012

JAN 2013

FEB 2013

MAR 2013

APR 2013

MAY 2013

JUN 2013

JUL 2013

AUG 2013

Monthly steering committee meetings with District agencies (goal, target area, data planning, and communication planning) Wardspecific CBO Strategy sessions

Summer Strategy Event Youth survey disseminated

Youth focus groups

Youth Planning Team meetings Young adult coordinator applications

YAC interviews

Traditional Summer Grant GTA sessions held

YAC work

Biweekly summer check-in meetings with District agency directors and key staff

Monthly meetings with Deputy Mayors and District agency directors Traditional Summer Grant RFP released

YAC training

Traditional Summer Grants awarded Minigrant RFP released & GTA sessions held

Mini-grant program awards announced

Mini-grant event awards announced on rolling basis One City Summer Initiative Data collection and evaluation implementation Agency and community feedback

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

APPENDIX C: OCSI 2013 YOUTH VOICE DATA COLLECTION TOOLS i. Youth Voice Survey

DC One City Summer Youth Voice Survey The city is interested in the kinds of programs you participate in now and/or would like participate in during the year and the summer. Your feedback will tell us here what you like to do and we will do our best to make sure the kind of programming and supports you need are provided to you. This survey is private. Do not write your name on this survey. No one at your school, home, or program will see your answers. If you are not comfortable answering a question, just leave it blank. There are no right or wrong answers, and your answers will not affect your participation in the program in any way. Thank you for all of your help!

What programs are you involved in right now? (Select all that apply). O O O O O O O O O O O O

Programs at the library (such as volunteering, reading, etc) Programs with the Department of Employment Services Afterschool programs in a school Afterschool and/or weekend programs outside of school Programs with the police department Programs with Child and Family Services Agency Programs at the rec centers (such as sports, camps, etc) Programs with the National Guard Programs with the Department of the Environment Working at a job Volunteering somewhere I am not involved in any other programs

Other ________________________________________

What programs were you involved last summer? (Select all that apply). O O O O O O O O O O O O

Other ________________________________________

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

What kinds of help do you need to help you now or in the future? (Select all that apply) O O O O O O O O

A mentor A tutor College prep/financial aid for college Health services information Places to work out Transportation Finding a place to live Finding food

Other ________________________________________

What activities would you like to see for people your age this summer? (Select all that apply) O O O O O O O O O O O O

Activities at night (6-9pm) Activities late night (9 pm-1 am) Weekend activities Career fairs and info Arts and media workshops Sports tournaments Fashion shows Music concerts Movie nights College preparation help Skating night Pool parties

Other ________________________________________ (TURN OVER THE PAGE TO FINISH THE SURVEY)

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

How old are you? O O O O O O

What is your gender? O O

5-9 years 10-13 years 14-15 years 16-17 years 18-20 years 21-24 years

Male Female

Do you have a DC One Card? O O O

Yes No I don’t know

What’s your favorite place to hang out? Please give as much information as you can—such as the name of the establishment and address. This will help us plan events for you.

What neighborhood in DC do you live in? (Example: Shaw, Barry Farms, etc).

THANK YOU FOR COMPLETING THE SURVEY!!!!!! If you have any more ideas or want to help with planning the summer, email dconecitysummer2013@gmail.com This survey is being conducted by the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation, the organizers of the 2013 DC One City Summer Initiative. If you have questions you can contact Rebecca Renard at (202) 347-4441, extension 287 or rrenard@cyitc.org!

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

APPENDIX C: OCSI 2013 YOUTH VOICE DATA COLLECTION TOOLS ii. Youth Focus Group Questions

»»

Number each participant ¡¡

Ask if participant is currently in or out of school

¡¡

Ask each participant their age.

¡¡

Ask participant how long they have been in DC.

State: I am going to ask you a few general questions and then talk specifically about needs and challenges that you may face. All responses are strictly confidential. When you speak say your number before you talk.

NUMBER

SEX (M/F)

CURRENTLY IN SCHOOL (Y/N)

AGE

YEARS IN DC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1. How do you spend your time outside of school? What do you do at night? Weekends? Where do you like to hang out? 2. What are some of programs that you are involved with in school or out of school? What programs were you involved in last summer? Is there a program that you took part in, even once? Why do you choose this program? What part of the program do you like? What part do you not like? 3. What are some programs and/or services that you would like to see in Washington DC? What programs would you like to see for the summer? Are there any programs that may help you that may be missing? How do you think the programs that are there now can be strengthened?

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

4. What do you believe you need help with to do well your future? What do you need to help them do this? Discuss negative behaviors. 5. What do you think the biggest challenge in participating in events during the summer? For example, do you think it is transportation or do you think you donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t know how to apply to college? 6. Do you have a DC One Card? What do you use it for? What would you like to use it for? 7. Do you feel safe in your neighborhood? 8. If you had to develop city-wide goals for the summer, what would they be? 9. What activities would you like to see to help you be better at: a. Workforce b. Academics c. Healthy Lifestyles d. Safety e. Family Participation

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

APPENDIX D: OCSI 2013 YOUTH GOALS

The five goals (Workforce Development, Educational Achievement, Healthy Lifestyles, Safety and Structure and Strengthening Families) are compartmentalized on the matrix, but it should be noted that many of the outcomes are interrelated in achieving the ultimate goal of increasing the success of youth transitioning positively into adulthood. The goals were developed using a child and youth development framework and reflect an integration of current DC initiative goals and blend policy, research and practice. District agencies providing input for the goals include CFSA, DCPL, DCHA, DCPS, DMH, DOES, DOH, DPR, DYRS, MPD, OAG, and OSSE. The goals are pending review from Raise DC, Healthy Schools Act, Workforce Investment Council, and the One City Action Plan initiatives.

GOAL

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

Young people will gain meaningful work and career exposure, experience, and skills. 2

EXAMPLE ACTIVITITES

YOUTH DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

YOUNGER YOUTH OUTCOMES1 (5–12 YEARS)

OLDER YOUTH OUTCOMES1 (13–18 YEARS)

YOUNG ADULT OUTCOMES1 (19–24 YEARS)

YOUTH IMPACT OUTCOMES

• Exposure to career paths

Mastery and Future

65% of younger youth will be

65% of older youth will be

65% of young

• Lower unemploy-

able to identify their strengths and interests.

able to identify future career paths that in-

• Meaningful interaction with professionals • Informal and structured training experiences and opportunities

corporate their strengths and interests. Employability

Responsibility and Autonomy

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

65% of younger

65% of older

youth will have knowledge about different

youth will have knowledge of steps needed

career paths.

to reach their identified career goals.

65% of younger youth will have knowledge of the different skills needed for employment (ex. resumes, time manage ment).

65% of older youth will have employability skills (ex. resume/cover letter, time management).

adults will be engaging in activities (ex. internships, training, apprenticeships, post-secondary program) around their

ment rate for city • Increase in youth employment rates • Retention at job • Increase college graduation rates

career interests and/or path.

66% of young adults will exhibit employability by gaining and retaining work opportunities.

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

GOAL

EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Children and

EXAMPLE ACTIVITITES

YOUTH DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

YOUNGER YOUTH OUTCOMES1 (5–12 YEARS)

OLDER YOUTH OUTCOMES1 (13–18 YEARS)

YOUNG ADULT OUTCOMES1 (19–24 YEARS)

YOUTH IMPACT OUTCOMES

• Exposure to

Intellectual Ability

65% of younger youth will learn

65% of older youth will learn

65% of young adults will learn

• Increase DC CAS reading,

and be able to

writing, and

demonstrate growth and

math test scores

confidence in oral communication,

literacy, and critical thinking

skills.

65% of younger youth will learn

65% of older youth will learn

65% of young adults will learn

and be able to demonstrate

growth and

confidence in math and/or STEM skills.

65% of younger youth will understand the importance

65% of older youth will com-

65% of young adults will be

plete their school work regularly.

motivated to learn new things.

youth will increase their

reading, writing, and oral

academic knowledge

presentation skills

and skills and increase their chance of academic advancement.

• Exposure and engagement in math and STEM activities • College awareness and college-going support • Opportunities to learn and practice leadership skills.

Responsibility and Autonomy

• Opportunities for

of school and other educational activities.

creative expression

65% of younger youth will be able to adopt strategies to overcome obstacles that may inhibit educational success.

Mastery and Future

65% of younger youth will have knowledge of the importance of post-secondary education.

advancement • Higher high school graduation rates • Higher rates of college attendance and completion rates • Lower truancy rates • Higher attendance rates

65% of older youth will attend school regularly. 65% of older youth will be able to adopt strate-

65% of young adults will utilize previously learned

gies to overcome strategies and/ obstacles that or resources may inhibit educa- to overcome tional success. obstacles that inhibit educational success. 65% of older youth will have knowledge of the steps needed go to college (ex. SAT/ ACT, admissions, FAFSA). 65% of older youth will be able to identify post-secondary options that match their career interests.

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

• Higher rates of grade level

50% of young adults will enter an apprenticeship program and/or post-secondary program. 65% of young adults will identify supports and resources to help increase their post-secondary plans.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

GOAL

HEALTHY LIFESTYLES

Children and youth will increasingly

EXAMPLE ACTIVITITES

YOUTH DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

YOUNGER YOUTH OUTCOMES1 (5–12 YEARS)

OLDER YOUTH OUTCOMES1 (13–18 YEARS)

YOUNG ADULT OUTCOMES1 (19–24 YEARS)

YOUTH IMPACT OUTCOMES

• Opportunities and

Civic and Social

65% of younger

75% of older

75% of young

• Lower obesity

Responsibility

youth will have awareness of

youth will have positive attitudes

adults will be active, positive

the importance of helping

towards the community.

members in their community.

adopt healthy

activities to increase

lifestyles.

physical activity

others and their community.

• Development of knowledge

Self-Worth

and skills in stress management • Opportunities for civic engagement • Opportu-

Belonging and Membership

nities to engage in activities that promote healthy lifestyles and reduce risky

Mental Health

behaviors • Providing healthy meals • Opportunities for creative expression

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

rates • Lower rates of substance abuse • Lower rates of mental health disorders

65% of younger

75% of older

youth will openly share their

youth will broaden their perspec-

thoughts and ideas to become

tives of ways and be willing to help

active in the

others and their

community.

65% of younger youth will be able

65% of older youth will be able

75% of young adults will be able

to identify at least one adult social

to identify at least two adult social

to identify at least three adult social

support to share questions and/or concerns with.

supports to share questions and/or concerns with.

65% of younger youth will develop positive interpersonal skills (ex. listening,

65% of older youth will be able to manage their emotion and feelings in

65% of young adults will be able to positively regulate their emotions.

communication).

appropriate ways (ex. talking, arts,

• Lower rates of sexually transmitted diseases • Lower teenage pregnancy rates • Lower asthma rates

physical activity). 65% of youth will

65% of older

65% of young

understand the different coping styles/resources to deal with daily challenges and uncontrollable and/or overwhelming stresses.

youth will develop coping styles and resources to deal with daily challenges and uncontrollable and/or overwhelming stresses.

adults will utilize their previously learned abilities for dealing with challenges and uncontrollable and/or overwhelming stresses.

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

GOAL

HEALTHY LIFESTYLES

Children and youth will increasingly adopt healthy lifestyles.

EXAMPLE ACTIVITITES

YOUTH DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

YOUNGER YOUTH OUTCOMES1 (5–12 YEARS)

OLDER YOUTH OUTCOMES1 (13–18 YEARS)

YOUNG ADULT OUTCOMES1 (19–24 YEARS)

YOUTH IMPACT OUTCOMES

• Opportunities and

Physical Health

65% of younger

65% of older

65% of young

• Lower obesity

youth will have awareness of the

youth will have positive attitudes

adults will be able to regulate

physical

importance of healthy eating

about healthy eating.

and control daily consumption of

activity

habits.

activities to increase

• Develop-

calories, sugars, carbohydrates, and fats.

65% of younger

65% of youth will

youth will be able

be able to identify

and skills

to identify foods that are healthy,

healthy foods that are easily available

in stress management

enjoyable, and easily available to

when they hang out with friends

them at home or school.

and in moments of intense hunger.

65% of younger

65% of older

75% of young

youth will have awareness of the importance of and different ways to engage in physical

youth will engage in at least 45 minutes of physical activity at least 3 times a week.

adults will engage in at least 60 minutes of physical activity four times a week.

ment of knowledge

• Opportunities for civic engagement • Opportunities to engage in activities that promote healthy

• Lower rates of substance abuse • Lower rates of mental health disorders • Lower rates of sexually transmitted diseases • Lower teenage pregnancy rates • Lower asthma rates

activity.

lifestyles and reduce risky

65% of younger youth will be

65% of older youth will be

behaviors

able to identify physical activities/

able to identify activities that pro-

sports that are fun and easy to do with friend or family.

mote sedentary behaviors and find alternates that include physical activity.

75% of younger youth will feel positive about their future.

75% of older youth will feel positive about their future.

85% of young adults will feel positive about their future.

75% of older youth will be able to identify future (long-term) goals and articulate realistic steps to meet those goals.

85% of young adults will be working towards at least two of their future (longterm) goals.

• Providing healthy meals • Opportunities for creative expression

rates

Mastery and Future

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

GOAL

HEALTHY LIFESTYLES

Children and youth will increasingly

EXAMPLE ACTIVITITES

YOUTH DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

YOUNGER YOUTH OUTCOMES1 (5–12 YEARS)

OLDER YOUTH OUTCOMES1 (13–18 YEARS)

YOUNG ADULT OUTCOMES1 (19–24 YEARS)

YOUTH IMPACT OUTCOMES

• Opportunities and

Responsibility

65% of younger

65% of older

75% of young

• Lower obesity

and Autonomy

youth will feel confident about

youth will be empowered to

adults will practice safe sex

not engaging in sexual behaviors.

explore sexuality and express

behaviors.

adopt healthy

activities to increase

lifestyles.

physical activity

affection in age appropriate ways

• Develop-

and skills in stress management • Opportunities for civic engagement • Opportunities to engage in activities that promote healthy lifestyles and reduce risky behaviors • Providing healthy meals • Opportunities for creative expression

• Lower rates of substance abuse • Lower rates of mental health disorders

including delaying

ment of knowledge

rates

engaging in sexual activity.

• Lower rates of sexually

65% of younger youth will be

85% of older youth will be

able to identify

personal goals that would be

negatively affected by becoming

a teenage parent or by contracting

STIs or HIV.

65% of younger youth will

65% of older youth will have

85% of young adults will not en-

understand the consequences of excessive substance and illicit drug use.

the capacity to identify and adopt safer and healthier alternatives to substance use when with friends.

gage in drinking under age and illicit drug use.

55% of younger youth will develop

65% of older youth will be able

skills and will refuse substance and illicit drugs from peers.

to identify and walk away from unsupervised social gatherings and/or parties that

transmitted diseases • Lower teenage pregnancy rates • Lower asthma rates

involve substance use. 65% of younger youth will feel confident not to engage in substance abuse.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

65% of older youth will be able to identify highly valued personal behaviors/opportunities negatively affected by substance use.

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

GOAL

SAFETY AND STRUCTURE

Children and youth will have a safe

EXAMPLE ACTIVITITES

YOUTH DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

YOUNGER YOUTH OUTCOMES1 (5–12 YEARS)

OLDER YOUTH OUTCOMES1 (13–18 YEARS)

YOUNG ADULT OUTCOMES1 (19–24 YEARS)

YOUTH IMPACT OUTCOMES

• Exposure to activities and

Mental Health

65% of younger youth will be able to identify feelings of anger

65% of older youth will be able to identify causes for feelings of

65% of young adults will exhibit the ability to be assertive in

• Lower youth homicide rates

and other positive or negative feelings and

frustration, anger, and jealousy and utilize nonviolent strategies/ socially acceptable ways

expressing needs and wants, without using harmful

out-of-school and summer

strategies that reduce risky behav-

experience.

iors. • Opportunities to

adopt nonviolent strategies/ socially acceptable ways

practice leadership skills. • Development of skills in self-advocacy and conflict

to express these feelings. Safety and Structure

resolution.

knowledge of the justice and court systems

Responsibility and Autonomy

Belonging and Membership and Civic and Social Ability

STRENGTHENING FAMILIES

Children, youth and families will have opportunities to strengthen their family.

• Outreach activities • Family friendly events • Opportunities for health and wellness information

1 2 3

Self-Awareness and Spirituality

to express these feelings. 65% of older youth will follow the laws and rules

65% of young adults will follow the laws and rules

apply the laws and rules for the

for the environments and/or activities they

engage in.

65% of younger youth will be able to identify personal goals that would be negatively affect-

85% of older youth will be able to identify personal goals that would be negatively affect-

ed by breaking rules and/or laws.

65% of younger youth will demonstrate respect

65% of older youth develop the capacity to

• Lower rates of reported criminal activity • Lower rates of bullying • Lower rates of youth

65% of younger youth will understand and

environments and/or activities they engage in.

• Development of

interpersonal aggression.

• Lower arrest rates

victimization • Lower rates of reported dating violence

75% of young adults will exhibit the capacity to

critically analyze and acceptance and apply skills for those whose self-expression are to resist social different from the pressures to use violence as an exones traditionally

critically analyze and apply skills to resist social pressures to use violence as an ex-

expected of their gender, race,

pression of anger, peer pressure or

neighborhood, etc.

disappointment.

65% of families will understand the importance of appropriate family engagement.

• Lower child poverty rates

65% of families will demonstrate the ability to access and evaluate health information, products, and services.

• Lower rates of child abuse and neglect

65% of families will utilize resources around mental, social, education, and physical health and wellness. 75% of children, youth, and family will be an active member in their community.

• Higher immunization rates

Outcomes will be measured annually. A list of 21st century career/employability skills can be found at http://www.p21.org/overview/skills-framework/266 PAHO. (2005). Youth: Choices and Change. Promoting Healthy Behaviors in Adolescents. Washington, DC: World Health Organization

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

APPENDIX E: TARGET AREA SELECTION MAPS* Juvenile Arrests per Capita

-DQXDU\ WR -XQH Juvenile Arrests Per Capita

401

4 401

203

404

403 403

405405

304304 303 304 303 305 305

206

2 207

0% to 1% `

1% to 1.5% 1.5% to 2% 2 to 2.2% 2.2% to 3%

502 502

( 67 1:

101

503 03

504 504

601 601 601

102 102

103 103

105 106 106 105

703 703

603 603

107 107

605 605

607 607 701 701

602 602

($67 &$3,72/ 67

,1'(3(1'(1&( $9( 6(

8 707 707

505 505

+ 67 1(

101

104 104

% of youth arrested

501 501

208 308 307 308 208 307

. 67 1:

207

404

301 301 302302

204 204

206 0 67 1:

402 402

7+ 67 6:

205

3 3

7+ 67 1:

203

202 202 205

1257+ &$3,72/ 67

201 201

7 604

604

606 606

702 702 704 704

705 705

706 706

0LOHV

36$ %RXQGDULHV

7KLV PDS ZDV FUHDWHG IRU SODQQLQJ SXUSRVHV IURP D YDULHW\ RI VRXUFHV ,W LV QHLWKHU D VXUYH\ QRU D OHJDO GRFXPHQW ,QIRUPDWLRQ SURYLGHG E\ RWKHU DJHQFLHV VKRXOG EH YHULILHG ZLWK WKHP ZKHUH DSSURSULDWH

I ndicator Maps are reflective of prior PSA boundaries. PSA boundaries were realigned in January of 2012 and again in January 2013. The target areas discussed in the narrative reflect the 2013 changes.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

Proficient Students in DCPS

6HSWHPEHU Âą -XQH Proficiency for DCPS Schools

401

4 401

203

404

403 403

405405

304304 303 304 303 305 305

206

2 207

80% and Above 60% to 79%

502 502

( 67 1:

101

503 03 601 601 601

+ 67 1(

102 102

103 103

105 106 106 105

703 703

603 603

107 107

605 605

607 607 701 701

602 602

($67 &$3,72/ 67

,1'(3(1'(1&( $9( 6(

8 707 707

505 505 504 504

101

104 104

% of proficient students

501 501

208 308 307 308 208 307

. 67 1:

207

404

301 301 302302

204 204

206 0 67 1:

402 402

7+ 67 6:

205

3 3

7+ 67 1:

203

202 202 205

1257+ &$3,72/ 67

201 201

7 604

604

606 606

702 702 704 704

705 705

706 706

40% to 59% 20% to 39%

0LOHV

36$ %RXQGDULHV

Below 20% * Average: 40% to 59%

7KLV PDS ZDV FUHDWHG IRU SODQQLQJ SXUSRVHV IURP D YDULHW\ RI VRXUFHV ,W LV QHLWKHU D VXUYH\ QRU D OHJDO GRFXPHQW ,QIRUPDWLRQ SURYLGHG E\ RWKHU DJHQFLHV VKRXOG EH YHULILHG ZLWK WKHP ZKHUH DSSURSULDWH

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Teenage Pregnancy

Per Capita Juvenile Arrests

401

4 401

203

404

403 403

405405

304304 303 304 303 305 305

206

2 207

( 67 1:

101

0% to 4% `

5% to 9% 10% to 14% 15% to 19% 21% to 25%

502 502

503 03

504 504

601 601 601

103 103

+ 67 1(

102 102

105 106 106 105

8 707 707

505 505

703 703

603 603

107 107

605 605

607 607 701 701

602 602

($67 &$3,72/ 67

,1'(3(1'(1&( $9( 6(

104 104

% of Births to Teenage Mom

501 501

208 308 307 308 208 307

. 67 1:

207

404

301 301 302302

204 204

206 0 67 1:

402 402

7+ 67 6:

205

3 3

7+ 67 1:

203

202 202 205

1257+ &$3,72/ 67

201 201

604 604

606 606

702 702 704 704

705 705

706 706

0LOHV

36$ %RXQGDULHV

7KLV PDS ZDV FUHDWHG IRU SODQQLQJ SXUSRVHV IURP D YDULHW\ RI VRXUFHV ,W LV QHLWKHU D VXUYH\ QRU D OHJDO GRFXPHQW ,QIRUPDWLRQ SURYLGHG E\ RWKHU DJHQFLHV VKRXOG EH YHULILHG ZLWK WKHP ZKHUH DSSURSULDWH

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

Map of Resources

Resource Map

'&36 '3/ '35 DQG 7UXVW )XQGHG &%2V

401

4 401

203

404

403 403

405405

304304 303 303 304 305 305

206

2 207

( 67 1:

101

DCPS `

707 707

505 505

503 03 601 601 601

+ 67 1(

102 102

103 103

105

703 703

603 603

107 107

105 106

605 605

607 607 701 701

602 602

($67 &$3,72/ 67

,1'(3(1'(1&( $9( 6(

8 CBO

502 502

504 504

101

104 104

501 501

208 308 307 308 208 307

. 67 1:

207

404

301 301 302302

204 204

206 0 67 1:

402 402

7+ 67 6:

205

3 3

7+ 67 1:

203

202 202 205

1257+ &$3,72/ 67

201 201

604 604

606 606

702 702 704 704

705 705

706 706

DPL DPR

0LOHV

36$ %RXQGDULHV 7KLV PDS ZDV FUHDWHG IRU SODQQLQJ SXUSRVHV IURP D YDULHW\ RI VRXUFHV ,W LV QHLWKHU D VXUYH\ QRU D OHJDO GRFXPHQW ,QIRUPDWLRQ SURYLGHG E\ RWKHU DJHQFLHV VKRXOG EH YHULILHG ZLWK WKHP ZKHUH DSSURSULDWH

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Miles Neighborhood Market

Windows Cafe & Market DC Mini Market T & G Grocery Capitol Food Mart

0.5

Circle 7 North East Market A&S Grocery Menick's Market A-1 Grocery

Tony's Mar ket

Dollar Plus

G&G Grocery

Martha's Market

Marbury Market

Penn Way

MLK Grocery Dollar Plus Food Corner Market

OPID0020797

K&H Grocery

Elmira Grocery

Office of Planning ~ September 23, 2011 Government of the District of Columbia This map was created for planning purposes from a variety of sources. It is neither a survey nor a legal document. Information provided by other agencies should be verified with them where appropriate.

Participating Stores

Healthy Corner Stores Initiative

Grocery Stores Food Deserts Food Deserts & High Poverty

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

Additional Data to Consider

3RSXODWLRQ E\ :DUG LQ 36$

3RSXODWLRQ XQGHU \HDUV

2EHVLW\

2YHUZHLJKW

2EHVH

5HF /HYHO RI 3K\VLFDO $FWLYLW\

$YJ P WR D 3DUN

:DUG

Source: DC Department of Health, 2010.

Source: Neighborhood Info, 2011.

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

APPENDIX F: OCSI 2013 YOUNG ADULT COORDINATOR JOB DESCRIPTION AND APPLICATION YOUNG ADULT COORDINATOR POSITION DESCRIPTION BACKGROUND The Mayor’s One City Summer Initiative (OCSI), coordinated by the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation (CYITC), brings together DC government agencies and community partners to coordinate strong opportunities, services, and supports for youth and families in the City during the summer months. Through OCSI’s Target Area Strategy, several neighborhoods have been identified that have high incidences of youth arrests, teen pregnancy, low academic achievement, and health risks. OCSI partners will do intense and targeting programming for younger youth (ages 5-12), older youth (ages 13-18), and young adults (ages 19-24) in those target areas. Most of the programming will be anchored in the DC Housing Authority (DCHA) properties located there, though some programming will take place in other sites. OVERVIEW OCSI Young Adult Coordinators will be responsible for coordinating the programming that takes place within target area sites, serving as the point of contact for the target area assigned for agencies and community-based organizations (CBOs), and working with DCHA resident council members and other community partners to address challenges on-site in their target area. Young Adult Coordinators will also lead that site’s younger youth (ages 5-12) in a youthidentified community action or civic engagement project using promising practices of positive youth development. Young Adult Coordinators will work from mid-June to mid-August, with an intense 2 week training prior to working in their assigned DCHA community. Direct work in the community will be six weeks (July 1-August 9); and closing with an additional few days of wrap-up work (evaluations, reports, etc.). RESPONSIBILITIES »»

Attend all mandatory trainings, including the two-week preparation training and the weekly debrief/planning sessions

»»

Provide outreach in your assigned community, to get residents to attend planned programs and events.

»»

Recruit younger youth (ages 5-12) from the community to work with on a youth action project

»»

Facilitate a youth-identified community action, community service, or civic engagement project in your assigned target area

»»

Coordinate outreach activities led by government and community partners, and recruit community residents to participate in those activities

»»

Serve as a point of contact for community providers doing programming in your assigned community

»»

Complete weekly summary reports and a final report on activities

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

»»

Serve as a role model and informal mentor to youth in Target Areas

»»

Complete other duties as assigned by OCSI Coordinator and Steering Committee members

QUALIFICATIONS »»

Must be 19–24 years old

»»

Have experience in planning programs or projects with youth or peers, especially community service or advocacy projects

»»

Ability to communicate with multiple stakeholders--OCSI agency partners, community program providers, DCHA Resident Council members, and youth

»»

Able to work collaboratively in teams

»»

Strong oral and written communication abilities

»»

Ability to research and identify community resources (i.e. community mapping)

»»

Interest in working with youth

»»

Strong commitment to social justice, social change, and community empowerment

»»

Strong familiarity with neighborhoods in DC and public transportation systems (especially Metrobus)

»»

Proficiency with basic word processing software (Word and Excel) and electronic communications (e-mail)

»»

All candidates must complete a background check, through Metropolitan Police Department

»»

Though residence in DC is not required, it is preferred

HOURS, WAGE, BENEFITS »»

Young Adult Coordinators will work approximately 30 hours per week ¡¡

Primarily Monday-Friday (though an occasional Saturday may be required)

¡¡

Primarily in the afternoon-early evening hours (ex: 12pm-6pm, though there might be slight variation in exact schedule)

¡¡

Between July 1–August 9, Young Adult Coordinators will have to work two days per week until 9pm (ex: 3pm-9pm)

»»

Coordinators will earn $15 per hour

»»

Young Adult Coordinators are not eligible for benefits. July 4 is an unpaid holiday.

TO APPLY Write a thoughtful, detailed cover letter, and submit your resumé to Rebecca Renard at rrenard@cyitc.org by May 10, 2013. Your cover letter should discuss why you are interested in the position, how your life and work experience make you a good fit (be sure to review all the responsibilities and qualifications of the job!!), and how you found out about the position. **Young adults who live/lived in the following communities: Benning Terrace, Columbia Heights, Greenleaf, Washington Highlands, Kenilworth Courts, Langston Dwellings, Lincoln Heights, Richardson Dwellings, Sursum Corda, Woodland Terrace); immigrant youth; and low-income youth are encouraged to apply.**

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

APPENDIX G: OCSI 2013 EVENING OUTREACH CALENDAR

DATE

LOCATION

PROVIDER

TARGET AGE GROUP

7/8

Langston

DOH – Metro Teen AIDS (Sexual Health and Young People)

All

7/8

Woodland

DMH

All

7/8

Benning Terrace

Beautiful U Yes U L.O.T.T. (Leaders of today and tomorrow)

Older Youth

7/8

Benning Terrace

HSEMA

All

7/8

Greenleaf

OSSE Special Education

All

7/8

DC General

DHS DC General Teen Program"

Older Youth

7/8

DC General

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council -‐ mobile vans

Younger Youth

7/9

Sursum Corda

Ballou STAY High School

Older Youth

7/9

Sursum Corda

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council – mobile vans

Younger Youth

7/9

Lincoln Heights

DOH – Ward 7/8 Prevention Center, Alcohol, Other Drug and Tobacco Prevention

All

7/9

Langston

MPD -‐ Play Streets

All

7/9

Langston

DPR Movie Night

Families

7/9

Kenilworth

Workforce Dev. Program of UDC

Young Adults

7/9

Kenilworth

DOH CASH Adolescent Health (Bullying, Sexual Violence, Healthy Relationships, Younger Youth etc.

7/9

Columbia Heights

DHS/Economic Security Admin

Young Adults

7/9

Highland

DPR Skatemobile

All

7/10

DC General

DCPL Sing Talk and Read to your children(for parents and caregivers)

Families

7/10

Woodland

DHS Community Resource Fair

Families

7/10

Richardson

DPR Rockwall

Families

7/10

Langston

DOH CASH Adolescent Health (Bullying, Sexual Violence, Healthy Relationships, All etc.

7/10

Langston

DOH – Sasha Bruce (HIV testing and sexual health education)

All

7/10

Highland

MPD—Beat the Streets

Families

7/10

Benning Terrace

DOH – HEPRA (CPR and Basic First Aid)

All

7/10

Benning Terrace

DDOT (Capital Bike Share)

All

7/10

Greenleaf

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council (Mobile Vans)

Younger Youth

7/10

Greenleaf

DPR-‐WON

Young Adults

7/10

Greenleaf

Ward 5/6 Prevention Center – DOH Synthetic Substances and iTalk

Families

7/11

Sursum Corda

University of the District of Columbia

All

7/11

Richardson

Ward 7/8 Prevention Center – DOH – Alcohol, Other Drug and Tobacco Prevention

All

7/11

Langston

MPD Community Event

All

7/11

Kenilworth

Office of Neighborhood Engagement

Families

7/11

Highland

DMH

All

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

DATE

LOCATION

PROVIDER

TARGET AGE GROUP

7/11

Highland

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council – mobile vans

Younger Youth

7/11

Columbia Heights

Dept of Health – Ward 1/2 Prevention Center Underage Drinking: Staying Above the Influence

Older Youth

7/11

Columbia Heights

DPR Movie Night

Families

7/11

Columbia Heights

HSEMA

All

7/11

Greenleaf

DPR-‐WON

Young Adults

7/15

DC General

HSEMA

All

7/15

DC General

Metro TeenAIDS Sexual Health and Young People

All

7/15

Langston

OSSE Truancy Parent Guide

All

7/15

Greenleaf

DCRA Building Safety

All

7/15

Woodland

University of the District of Columbia

All

7/15

Benning Terrace

DMH

All

7/15

Benning Terrace

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council (Mobile Vans)

Younger Youth

7/16

Sursum Corda

DHS Community Resource Fair

Families

7/16

Sursum Corda

DCPL – Diaries and Summer Reading

All

7/16

Lincoln Heights

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council – mobile vans

All

7/16

Lincoln Heights

OSSE Healthy Eating

All

7/16

Kenilworth

University of the District of Columbia

All

7/16

Highland

Office of Neighborhood Engagement

Families

7/16

Columbia Heights

DOH – The Women’s Collective-‐ FRESH Peer Education Program

All

7/16

Columbia Heights

DMH

7/17

DC General

University of the District of Columbia

All

7/17

DC General

DCPL Sing Talk and Read to your children(for parents and caregivers)”

Families

7/17

Woodland

DCPL Teen Summer Reading Program

Older Youth

7/17

Langston

DOH -‐ Ward 5/6 Prevention Center Synthetic Substances and iTalk

Families

7/17

Greenleaf

DPR—WON

Young Adults

7/17

Greenleaf

DPR–Fun Wagon

Younger Youth

7/17

Greenleaf

District Dept of Transportation Capital Bike Share

All

7/17

Benning Terrace

DC Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency (Emergency/ Disaster Preparedness

All

7/17

Benning Terrace

DOH – Safe and Drug Free Coalition (Real Talk Focus Group)

Young Adults

7/18

Sursum Corda

DYRS Safe Summer Community Festival

Families

7/18

Richardson

DOH – Ward 7/8 Prevention Center Alcohol, Other Drug and Tobacco Prevention

All

7/18

Richardson

OSSE High Quality Child Care and Education

All

7/18

Kenilworth

DDOT Capital Bike Share

All

7/18

Kenilworth

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council – mobile vans

Younger Youth

7/18

Highland

University of the District of Columbia

All

7/18

Columbia Heights

Dept of Health – Ward ½ Prevention Center Tobacco: Marketing for You

All

7/18

Columbia Heights

DPR Skatemobile

Younger Youth

7/18

Columbia Heights

DOH – The Women’s Collective-‐ FRESH Peer Education Program

7/18

Greenleaf

DPR WON

Young Adults

7/19

Woodland

DPR—Skatemobile

Families

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

DATE

LOCATION

PROVIDER

TARGET AGE GROUP

7/19

Greenleaf

DPR Rockwall

Families

7/22

DC General

DHS DC Homeless Children’s Playtime Project

Younger Youth

7/22

DC General

DOH -‐ Sasha Bruce HIV testing and sexual health education

All

7/22

Woodland

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council – mobile vans

Younger Youth

7/22

Woodland

Boys & Girls Clubs -‐ FBR Nation

Older Youth

7/22

Langston

DOH – Metro Teen AIDS Sexual Health and Young People

All

7/22

Langston

University of the District of Columbia

All

7/22

Kenilworth

DPR—Fun Wagon

Families

7/22

Greenleaf

Office of Neighborhood Engagement

Families

7/22

Benning Terrace

DOH – Safe and Drug Free Coalition (Real Talk Focus Group)

Younger Youth

7/23

Sursum Corda

DCPL – Diaries and Summer Reading

All

7/23

Sursum Corda

DHS/Economic Security Admin

Young Adults

7/23

Lincoln Heights

DOH -‐ Ward 7/8 Prevention Center (Alcohol, Other Drug and Tobacco Prevention)

All

7/23

Lincoln Heights

DCRA Building Safety

All

7/23

Highland

DOH – Metro Teen AIDS (Sexual Health and Young People)

All

7/23

Highland

HSEMA

All

7/23

Columbia Heights

DOH – The Women’s Collective (FRESH Peer Education Program)

All

7/23

Columbia Heights

DCPL Summer Reading Program (Craft and Puppet Show — Digging Up Digging out)

Younger Youth

7/24

DC General

DCPL Sing Talk and Read to your children (for parents and caregivers)

Families

7/24

Woodland

DPR (Fun Wagon)

All

7/24

Woodland

Boys & Girls Clubs (FBR Nation)

Older Youth

7/24

Langston

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council (Mobile vans)

Younger Youth

7/24

Langston

MPD (Play Streets)

All

7/24

Greenleaf

Ward 5/6 Prevention Center (Underage Drinking Under YOUR Influence Workshop)

All

7/24

Greenleaf

MPD (Ice Cream Social)

All

7/24

Greenleaf

DPR-‐WON

Young Adults

7/24

Benning Terrace

MPD (Beat the Streets)

Families

7/25

Woodland

DPR (Movie Night)

Families

7/25

Sursum Corda

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council (Mobile vans)

Younger Youth

7/25

Richardson

Safe and Drug Free Coalition -‐ DOH (Real Talk Focus Group)

Young Adults

7/25

Richardson

DCRA (Building Safety)

All

7/25

Kenilworth

DPR (Fun Wagon)

Families

7/25

Highland

DCPL (Summer On the Go Crafts)

Older Youth

7/25

Highland

DDOT (Capital Bike Share)

All

7/25

Greenleaf

DPR–WON

Young Adults

7/25

Columbia Heights

DOH Ward 1/2 Prevention Center (Marijuana and K2)

Older Youth

7/25

Columbia Heights

DOH – The Women’s Collective (FRESH Peer Education Program)

All

7/26

Woodland

DPR (Movie Night)

Families

7/26

Langston

MPD (Movie Night)

All

7/26

Columbia Heights

DPR (Electronic Games Challenge)

Families

7/29

DC General

DCPL -‐ Children's Librarian

Younger Youth

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

DATE

LOCATION

PROVIDER

TARGET AGE GROUP

7/29

Woodland

DDOT (Capital Bike Share)

All

7/29

Benning Terrace

OSSE

All

7/29

Benning Terrace

Workforce Dev. Program of UDC

Young Adults

7/29

Greenleaf

DCPL (DIY Flower Garden)

Older Youth

7/29

Greenleaf

DOH – Sasha Bruce (HIV testing and sexual health education)

All

7/30

Sursum Corda

OSSE

All

7/30

Sursum Corda

DCPL (Diaries and Summer Reading)

All

7/30

Lincoln Heights

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council (Mobile vans)

Younger Youth

7/30

Lincoln Heights

SNAP ED (Healthy Eating for Growing Strong)

Younger Youth

7/30

Kenilworth

OSSE (High Quality Child Care and Education)

All

7/30

Highland

DPW (Not in Our DC)

All

7/30

Benning Terrace

DPR Movie Night

All

7/30

Columbia Heights

DOH – The Women’s Collective-‐ FRESH Peer Education Program

All

7/30

Columbia Heights

Workforce Dev. Program of UDC

Young Adults

7/31

DC General

OSSE

All

7/31

DC General

Workforce Dev. Program of UDC

Young Adults

7/31

Woodland

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council (Mobile vans)

Younger Youth

7/31

Langston

Office of Neighborhood Engagement

Families

7/31

Langston

DCPL Summer Reading Program – Cornucopia Challenge

Older Youth

7/31

Kenilworth

DPR—Skatemobile

Families

7/31

Greenleaf

DPR—WON

All

7/31

Greenleaf

DOH-‐Ward 5/6 Prevention Center Talk. They Hear You (underage drinking –parents)

Families

7/31

Benning Terrace

DOH – Metro Teen AIDS (Sexual Health and Young People)

All

8/1

Sursum Corda

University of the District of Columbia

All

8/1

Richardson

DOH -‐ Ward 7/8 Prevention Center (Alcohol, Other Drug and Tobacco Prevention)

All

8/1

Richardson

SNAP ED (Healthy Eating for Growing Strong)

Younger Youth

8/1

Kenilworth

Safe and Drug Free Coalition -‐ DOH (Real Talk Focus Group)

Young Adults

8/1

Highland

DCPL – Summer On the Go Crafts

Older Youth

8/1

Greenleaf

DPR—WON

Young Adults

8/1

Columbia Heights

SERVE DC

Older Youth

8/1

Columbia Heights

DOH – The Women’s Collective FRESH Peer Education Program

All

8/2

Lincoln Heights

DPR—Fun Wagon

Families

8/5

Woodland

DOH — Sasha Bruce (HIV testing and sexual health education)

All

8/5

Richardson

DPR—Fun Wagon

Families

8/5

Kenilworth

DPR—Skatemobile

Families

8/5

Greenleaf

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council (Mobile vans)

Younger Youth

8/5

Langston

DCPL Summer Reading Program Craft and Book Talk

All

8/5

Benning Terrace

University of the District of Columbia

Older Youth

8/6

Woodland

DPR—Fun Wagon

Families

8/6

Sursum Corda

DCPL – Diaries and Summer Reading

All

8/6

Sursum Corda

DHS/Economic Security Admin

Young Adults

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

DATE

LOCATION

PROVIDER

TARGET AGE GROUP

8/6

Lincoln Heights

Metro Teen AIDS

All

8/6

Kenilworth

MPD – Bike with an officer

All

8/6

Kenilworth

MPD-‐ Girls Diary group

Older Youth

8/6

Kenilworth

DOH -‐Safe and Drug Free Coalition (Real Talk Focus Group)

Younger Youth

8/6

Highland

MPD-‐National Night Out

Families

8/6

Highland

Workforce Dev. Program of UDC

Young Adults

8/6

Columbia Heights

DOH – The Women’s Collective FRESH Peer Education Program

All

8/6

Columbia Heights

DPW

All

8/7

DC General

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council (Mobile vans)

Younger Youth

8/7

Woodland

Boys & Girls Clubs -‐ FBR Nation

Older Youth

8/7

Langston

Ward 5/6 Prevention Center – Underage Drinking (Under YOUR Influence Workshop)

Families

8/7

Greenleaf

DDOT Capital Bike Share

All

8/7

Benning Terrace

DOH – Sasha Bruce (HIV testing and sexual health education)

All

8/7

Benning Terrace

Office of Neighborhood Engagement

Families

8/7

Columbia Heights

DPR Fun Wagon

Younger Youth

8/8

Sursum Corda

Workforce Dev. Program of UDC

Young Adults

8/8

Richardson

DOH -‐Safe and Drug Free Coalition (Real Talk Focus Group)

Younger Youth

8/8

Richardson

DPR Movie Night

Families

8/8

Richardson

DDOT Capital Bike Share

All

8/8

Kenilworth

State Early Childhood Development and Coordinating Council (Mobile vans)

Younger Youth

8/8

Highland

DOH CPR and basic first aid

All

8/8

Highland

DCPL – Summer On the Go Crafts

Older Youth

8/8

Columbia Heights

SERVE DC

Older Youth

8/8

Columbia Heights

DOH – The Women’s Collective FRESH Peer Education Program

All

8/8

Greenleaf

DPR—Skatemobile

Families

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

APPENDIX H: TRUST-FUNDED COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS ORGANIZATION

WARD

PSA

GOALS

AALEAD

101

Academic

African American Music Association 8

702

Safety

Amy Jacques

601

Workforce

Family

Angels of Hope

703

Academic

Healthy

Arts for Our Children

402

Academic

Healthy

Barbara Chambers

302

Academic

Safety

Beacon House

502

Academic

Healthy

Boys and Girls Club

407

Academic

Healthy

Brainfood

102

Healthy

Safety

Family

Beautiful U

702

Healthy

Safety

Family

Concerned Black Men

703

Academic

Safety

CC Area Health Education Center

602

Workforce

Academic

Centro Nia

302

Workforce

Academic

Community Family Life Services

704

Academic

Healthy

Children Charity

307

Academic

Healthy

CHS Family Strengthening Collaborative

302

Healthy

Covenant House Washington

704

Academic

Healthy

Safety

CitiWide Computer Training Center

302

Workforce

Academic

Safety

Family

City Gate

602

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Family

City Dance

308

Healthy

Safety

City Kids Wilderness Project

302

Academic

Healthy

College Success Foundation

306

Academic

Healthy

Daddy's Corner

302

Workforce

Healthy

Dance Place

501

Academic

Healthy

DayBreak

602

Academic

Healthy

DC Police Foundation

507

Healthy

Safety

DC SCORES

302

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Dance Institute of Washington

409

Workforce

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Do The Write Thing

604

Academic

ECSDC

305

Family

Education Plus 2

409

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Family

Empower Enterprise II

701

Workforce

Academic

Energy Institute

307

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Eagles Nest

706

Workforce

Healthy

Safety

Exodus Treatment Center

702

Healthy

Safety

Healthy

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

Safety

Healthy

Safety

Family

Safety

Family

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

ORGANIZATION

WARD

PSA

GOALS

FAN

706

Workforce

Healthy

Fishing School

601

Academic

Safety

Family Matters

705

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Field of Dreams

706

Healthy

Life Pieces

205

Academic

Healthy

Safety

GALA Theatre

302

Academic

Healthy

Georgetown University Center for Social Justice Research

601

Academic

Good Ground Good Life

104

Workforce

Girls Inc

306

Healthy

Global Kids

208

Workforce

Academic

Henson Arts

302

Workforce

Academic

Healthy Living Inc

108

Healthy

Safety

High Tea Society

103

Workforce

Healthy

Higher Achievement

108

Academic

Safety

Horizons Greater Washington

408

Academic

Horton's Kids

106

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Hubbard Place

409

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Howard University - Urban Progress 1

302

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Hung Tao

305

Academic

Healthy

ISPA

103

Workforce

JOM

104

Workforce

Safety

Jubilee Housing

303

Healthy

Safety

Kid Power

507

Academic

Keep it Real

608

Healthy

Safety

Keys to Canaan

103

Academic

Healthy

LAYC

206

Academic

Safety

Life Success

602

Academic

Safety

Little Lights

106

Academic

Martha's Table

301

Workforce

Academic

Mary's Center

404

Workforce

Academic

Multicultural Career Intern Program

302

Academic

Healthy

Multi-Media Technology Institute

502

Workforce

Safety

MOMIES

403

Academic

Healthy

National Center for Children and Families

602

Workforce

Academic

National Center for Families and Children

308

Academic

Healthy

National Housing Trust

304

Academic

Safety

NOMIS

507

Healthy

PAL

702

Academic

Pin Points

105

Academic

Peace Thru Culture

602

Academic

RICH

607

Academic

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Safety

Family

Safety

Family Safety

Family

Healthy

Safety

Safety Safety

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

ORGANIZATION

WARD

PSA

GOALS

Reacreation Wish List

705

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Sasha Bruce

104

Workforce

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Shaw Community Ministry

308

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Family

Super Leaders

708

Workforce

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Family

Transitional Housing Corporation

403

Academic

Safety

Thurgood Marshall Academy

703

Academic

Jarmal Harris Project

706

Workforce

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Family

Tree of Life

505

Academic

Healthy

Uniting Our Youth

502

Academic

Safety

UPO

707

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Family

Urban Alliance

208

Workforce

Urban Ed

701

Academic

Safety

Words Beats and Life

302

Workforce

Healthy

Safety

Family

WE CAN

601

Academic

Safety

Family

Washington Middle School for Girls

704

Academic

Woodland Tigers Youth Sports

702

Healthy

Safety

Family

World Missions

504

Academic

Safety

Family

Washington Tennis Education

603

Academic

Healthy

Safety

Youth Legacy

103

Workforce

Academic

Youth Leadership Foundation

504

Workforce

Academic

YOUR

404

Academic

Safety

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

Healthy

Safety

Family

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

APPENDIX I: OCSI 2013 DATA COLLECTION TOOLS i. Data Template INSTRUCTIONS: This data collection form will help provide standardized data on the various programs and events that are a part of the One City Summer Initiative. The information will be used to provide information at a city level as well as agency and community-based organization level. Please fill in as much information as possible. DEFINITIONS: »»

Youth: A participant who is age 5 to 24 years at the date of participation.

»»

Program: Organized and coordinated activities that occur for at least 5 days (consecutively or non-consecutively) during June 15 and August 23.

»»

Event: A one-time activity or gathering during June 15 and August 23.

»»

Drop-In Program: Organized and coordinated activities that occur more than one time for a different group of youth (consecutively or non-consecutively) during June 15 and August 23.

PROGRAM: FOR EACH YOUTH PARTICIPANT IN THE PROGRAM, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: »»

Participant Last Name: Please enter the last name for each individual youth participant.

»»

Participant First Name: Please enter the first name for each individual youth participant.

»»

Participant Date of Birth: Please enter the date of birth for each individual youth participant.

»»

DC One Card Number: Please enter the 8-12 DC One Card Number of the youth. Leave blank if the youth does not have a DC One Card or the number is not available.

»»

Agency or Organization: Please enter the agency or organization hosting the program.

»»

Program Name: Please enter the name of the program.

»»

Description of the Program: Please enter a short description of the program.

»»

Program Site: Please enter the name of the site of the program.

»»

Program Site Address: Please enter the address and zip code of site of the program (ex. 1600 4th Street NW, 20001).

»»

Ward of Program: Please enter the Ward the program is located or took place in. To find the Ward refer to: http://citizenatlas.dc.gov/atlasapps/reporthometab.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

aspx. If your program occurred in multiple Wards, please input the Ward of the actual program’s address. Note: you can only enter 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 »»

PSA of Program: Please enter the Police Service Area (PSA) the program is located or took place in. To find the PSA refer to: http://citizenatlas.dc.gov/atlasapps/reporthometab.aspx. If your program occurred in multiple PSAs, please input the PSA of the actual program’s address. Note: you can only enter: 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, or 708.

»»

Goals 1 to 5 (Respond Y or N): Please enter Y if the program targeted each respective goal or N if the program did not target each respective goal.

»»

Gender: Please enter F for Female, M for Male, or T for Transgender.

»»

Age: Please enter the age of youth participant (5 to 24 years).

»»

Highest Grade Level Completed: Please enter the highest grade level the youth has completed (K-12, 13=Some College, 14=Graduated College, 15=Some Graduate School, 16=Graduated Graduate School)

»»

Ward of Youth: Please enter the Ward the youth is from. To find the Ward refer to: http://citizenatlas.dc.gov/atlasapps/reporthometab.aspx. Note: you can only enter 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8

»»

PSA of Youth: Please enter the Police Service Area (PSA) the program the youth is from. To find the PSA refer to: http://citizenatlas.dc.gov/atlasapps/reporthometab.aspx. Note: you can only enter: 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, or 708)

»»

Race/Ethnicity: Please enter the race/ethnicity of the youth participant I= American Indian or Alaska Native, A=Asian or Pacific Islander, B=Black or African American, H=Hispanic or Latino, W=White, O=Other)

»»

Previous Summer Participant: Please enter Y if the youth participated in the program the previous summer or N if the participant did not participate in the program the previous summer.

»»

Days Attended: Please enter the TOTAL number of days the youth participated in the program.

»»

Total Days of Program: Please enter the TOTAL number of days the program was in session.

»»

Staffing Expenses: Please enter actual or best estimates of total staff/contractor/ etc. salaries and wages for the program.

»»

Program Expenses: Please enter costs for program and/or event materials, equipment, food, rentals, supplies etc for the program.

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

»»

Total Expended: This will automatically be calculated from adding the staffing and program expenses columns. You do not need to enter in any information.

»»

In-Kind Support: Please enter any in-kind donations received to support the program.

»»

In-Kind Support Source: Please enter the source of the in-kind donation received for the program.

EVENT OR DROP-IN PROGRAM: FOR EACH EVENT OR DROP-IN PROGRAM, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: »»

Date of event or drop-in program: Please enter the date that the event or dropin program occurred.

»»

Host Agency or Organization: Please enter the agency or organization hosting the event or drop-in program.

»»

Your Agency or Organization: Please enter the name of your agency or organization.

»»

Event or Drop-In Program Name: Please enter the name of the event or drop-in program.

»»

Description of the Event or Drop-In Program: Please enter a short description of the event or drop-in program.

»»

Event or Drop-In Program Site: Please enter the name of the site of the event or drop-in program.

»»

Event or Drop-In Program Site Address (if applicable): Please enter the address and zip code of site of event or drop-in program (ex. 1600 4th Street NW, 20001) if applicable or available.

»»

Ward of Event or Drop-In Program: Please enter the Ward the event or drop-in program took place in. To find the Ward refer to: http://citizenatlas.dc.gov/atlasapps/reporthometab.aspx. Note: you can only enter 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8

»»

PSA of Event of Drop-In Program: Please enter the Police Service Area (PSA) the event or drop-in program took place in. To find the PSA refer to: http://citizenatlas.dc.gov/atlasapps/reporthometab.aspx. Note: you can only enter: 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, or 708.

»»

Goals 1 to 5 (Respond Y or N): Please enter Y if the event or drop-in program targeted each respective goal or N if the event or drop-in program did not target each respective goal.

»»

Gender: Please enter (if known), How many Males and Females attended.

»»

Total Number of Youth: This number will automatically be calculated from adding the number of youth males and females.

»»

Age: Please enter the age range of the participants.

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

»»

Prior Summer Event or Drop-In Program: Please enter Y if the event or drop-in program occurred in the previous summer or N if the event or drop-in program did not occur in the previous summer.

»»

Event or Drop-In Program Ward: Please enter the Ward the event or drop-in program was targeting participants from. To find the Ward refer to: http://citizenatlas.dc.gov/atlasapps/reporthometab.aspx. Note: you can only enter 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8

»»

Event or Drop-In Program PSA: Please enter the Police Service Area (PSA) the event or drop-in program was targeting participants from. To find the PSA refer to: http://citizenatlas.dc.gov/atlasapps/reporthometab.aspx. Note: you can only enter: 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, or 708)

»»

Target Population: Please enter the target population the event or drop-in program was occuring for.

»»

Total Attendance: Please enter the TOTAL number of people at the event or drop-in program.

»»

Staffing Expenses: Please enter actual or best estimates of total staff/contractor/ etc. salaries and wages for the event or drop-in program.

»»

Program Expenses: Please enter costs for program and/or event or drop-in program materials, equipment, food, rentals, supplies etc for the event or drop-in program.

»»

Total Expended: This will automatically be calculated from adding the staffing and program expenses columns. You do not need to enter in any information.

»»

In-Kind Support: Please enter any in-kind donations received to support the event or drop-in program.

»»

In-Kind Support Source: Please enter the source of the in-kind donation received for the event or drop-in program.

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

APPENDIX I: OCSI 2013 DATA COLLECTION TOOLS ii. Youth Survey

DC Youth One City Summer Survey This survey asks about your experiences in DC youth programs this summer. The survey is voluntary. You can choose not to answer questions if you do not want to. However, we hope that you will answer as many questions as you can. This survey is private. Do not write your name on this survey. No one at your school, home, or program will see your answers. Please answer the questions as honestly as you can. If you are not comfortable answering a question, just leave it blank. This is not a test. There are no right or wrong answers, and your answers will not affect your participation in the program in any way. Thank you for all of your help!

How old are you? O O O O O O O O O O

5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years 10 years 11 years 12 years 13 years 14 years

O O O O O O O O O O

5. What summer program(s) or activity did you participate in this summer? (Select all that apply).

15 years 16 years 17 years 18 years 19 years 20 years 21 years 22 years 23 years 24 years

O O O O O O O

6. How long have you participated in these summer program(s)?

What is your sex? O O

Female Male

What is your race/ethnicity? Select all that apply. O O O O O O O

American Indian or Alaska Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black or African American Hispanic or Latino White Other Not sure

Ward 1 Ward 2 Ward 3

O O O

Ward 4 Ward 5 Ward 6

O O O

O O O O O

This is my first year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 or more years

7. Did you feel safe at these summer program(s)? O O O

Always Sometimes Never

8. How did you hear about these summer program(s)? (Select all that apply).

4. What Ward do you live in? O O O

Summer Youth Employment Program (SYEP) Working a paying job/internship outside of SYEP Completing volunteer/community service hours Attending summer camp Attending summer school Going to the library Other

Ward 7 Ward 8 Not sure

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

O O O O

Facebook Twitter TV/Radio Metro

O O O O

Friend Parent/Guardian Teacher/Counselor Not sure

(TURN OVER THE PAGE TO FINISH THE SURVEY)

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

9. In the summer program(s), I got a chance to… (Fill in one each row)

12. In the summer program(s), I have learned… (Fill in one in each row)

Not at all

A little

A lot

Try new things

How to read and write better

Go to new places

How to be better at math and science

Make friends

How to use computers and technology better

Talk with adults about what’s going on in my life

Where to go if I need help in school

Work at a job that I liked

How to make good choices about the foods I eat

How to do physical activities that I like

10. The summer program(s) has helped me to… (Fill in one in each row)

Not at all

A little

A lot

Be motivated to learn new things

Feel happy with myself

Feel positive about my future

Help others in my community

Be healthier (ex. eat better and exercise more)

Not at all

A little

A lot

I can talk about careers that I am interested in

I know the steps needed to reach my career goals

I know the skills needed for employment (ex. resumes, time management)

I better understand the importance of going to college

I know the steps needed to go to college (ex. SAT/ACT, admissions, FAFSA) I can name at least two supports and/or resources that will help me go to college

11. After participating in the summer program(s)… (Fill in one in each row)

I better understand the importance of helping others in my community I know the different rules and laws in my community

Not at all

A little

A lot

How to share my ideas with others

How to deal with my feelings in a proper way

O O

How to deal with stress

How to respect people who are different from me

How to resist negative peer pressure

How to say “no” to alcohol, drugs, and other things that are not good for me

13. I am sure that I will… (Fill in one in each row) Finish high school

Not at all sure O

A little sure O

Very sure O

Finish college

Be able to find a job that I enjoy

Be able to do well in a job I have

14. In general, did you like coming to the summer program(s)?

O O O

Always Sometimes Never

15. Would you recommend the summer program(s) you participated in to your friends? O O O

Yes Maybe No

THANK YOU FOR COMPLETING THE SURVEY!!!!

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

APPENDIX I: OCSI 2013 DATA COLLECTION TOOLS iii. YAC Focus Group Questions YOUNG ADULT COORDINATORS FOCUS GROUP AUGUST 12, 2013 WELCOME AND WHY WE’RE HERE. Thank you for being here. We wanted to talk with you and get your feedback on what went well and what we could do differently. Discuss consent forms and request that participants not repeat what’s said in this room. They are under no obligation to stay. GETTING STARTED 1. Now that summer is almost over and many of you are heading off to new adventures, you’re going to be asked an inevitable question: “What did you do this summer?” How would you answer? 2. Please tell me how you heard about the One City Summer Initiative and what made you want to apply for the job of Young Adult Coordinator? 3. Please tell me about Orientation. What did you do? What did you learn? a. Now that you can look back, did the orientation program do a good job of preparing you for your roles? How? Were there things you wish had been covered that weren’t? How can we improve it for next year?

WORKING WITH DC AGENCIES AND COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS 4. As I mentioned at the outset, we’re interested in trying to understand how all of the different parts of the One City Summer Initiative worked together to help the community. I’d love to hear your perspective on that. Can you tell me: a. What you thought about the interaction with government agencies. Which agencies did you work with and how did it go? What other agencies or kinds of information do you think would have been good to have during the summer? b. Did any of you work with Community Based Organizations? If so, can you tell me about the interactions between the community and the CBOs?

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

WORK WITH THE RESIDENTS AND THE COMMUNITY 5. Please describe how you did outreach to the community. What did you do? Where did you go? What populations did you work with most? a. What are the key factors to success of outreach in your area? b.

What are the key barriers to success of outreach in your area?

c. How do you feel about the support you received from the residents, the community NEXT IS A QUESTION ABOUT WORKING WITH THE TRUST. Can you describe the level of support you received? What could have helped you be more effective in your role?

What was the best part of the summer? What was the most challenging?

Finally, a general concluding question: How can we improve the initiative moving forward? What suggestions do you have?

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

APPENDIX I: OCSI 2013 DATA COLLECTION TOOLS iv. Agency Feedback Interview Questions Thank you for your willingness to be interviewed. We really appreciate your time and your candor. And we know your comments will be helpful as we continue to try and improve the One City Youth initiative. Just as a reminder, all responses will be kept entirely confidential. Before we begin, I just want to remind you that in interviews of this kind, some questions might seem repetitive, but that’s because people remember different things when prompted in different ways at different times. Thanks for your patience! First a few questions about your role and your agency: 1. Have you participated in a previous One City Summer Initiative? a. If so, what previous roles have you played? 2. What was your role in OCSI this year? 3. What information did you receive about your role (duties and responsibilities) and from whom? Now, I’d like to ask you some questions about the planning process for One City Summer. 4. Do you think there is value in working with other agencies in this sort of collaborative initiative? If so, what is it? 5. What are some of the specific challenges and opportunities raised by this sort of collaboration? 6. What benefits did your agency realize as a result of this collaboration? 7. Can you tell me which aspects of the planning process went particularly well in your opinion? Which went less well? Now, let’s talk about the summer itself. 8. What were your expectations of One City Summer and your agency’s role at the beginning of the summer? 9. What do you think a successful summer (program?) looks like in the eyes of youth? Of agencies? 10. We’ll talk about the OCSI goals in a minute, but did your agency or organization have any specific goals for the summer? If so, what were they? 11. Did you think your agency met the specific goals you set at the outset?

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

We know that with any program there are things that go well and things that don’t go as well. 12. What do you think were the overall successes of this year’s OCSI? 13. What do you think helped to make reaching these goals a success? 14. Can you tell me about something that didn’t go well for your agency or for OCSI overall? 15. Can you tell me how you or your agency worked through those challenges? 16. What issues do you think affected your agency’s work with youth during the summer? As you know, a central component of OCSI is the Target Area Strategy and so I want to ask you a couple more specific questions about that. 17. First, were you aware of the target area strategy? 18. Did you have any input into the goals or the measures? 19. How well do you think OCSI worked towards them? A second key component of OCSI is the set of five youth goals. 20. Were you aware of the OCSI summer goals? 21. Did you have input into the goals or measures? 22. How well do you think OCSI worked towards them? In this last section, I’d like to ask you some general, concluding questions about OCSI. 23. What do you think worked better this summer than last summer? 24. What do you think did not work as well this summer as last? 25. Please comment on the level of support OCSI provided you and your agency during the summer. 26. Please describe any highlights or memorable moments you experienced during the OCSI. 27. Do you have any suggestions for improving OCSI? Comments? Questions? 28. If you could change one thing about OCSI what would it be? Explain.

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

APPENDIX J: OCSI 2013 EVENTS

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

APPENDIX K: MPD SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE 2013 MAPS

8th St NE

2900 2800

NE 0

Reed St NE

2626

10th St NE

2520 2606 2612

2310 324

514

DATA SOURCE: MPD DISTRICT, PSA & STREET CENTERLINE GEOSPATIAL DATA SOURCE: Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) data as of 4/23/2013

PSA

CREATED BY: SEAN E. GOODISON RESEARCH & ANALYSIS BRANCH - 300 INDIANA AVE NW - ROOM 4048 - WASHINGTON, DC 20001

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

Waterways 0

Ü Br en t

514

DISTRICTS 412

oo d

2110

DC STREETS

V St NE

320

Legend

1946

314

2002

1952

2100

NE 302

5th St NE

W St NE 230

505

626

2210

400

300

900

100 Br ya nt St N

2402

2400

3rd St NE

Adams St NE

224

720

200

d Rho

306

302

lan e Is

1000

n Pl N

200

Bryant St NE

802

226

2700

9th St NE

E St N ood Edge w

920

Fifth District NE ve dA

gto Washin

2410

N 8th Pl

308

806

300

2514

Channing St NE

224

Channin g P l NE

2506

502

4th St NE

200

2510 2520 2540

2640

Evarts St NE 1030

410

400

318

920

900

504

2504

Douglas St NE

200

Evarts St NE

Zone 1

2 50

1022

Franklin St NE

2720

2700

612

Girard St NE

2412

2804

6 62

410

902

2800

612

Evarts St NE

2900

2908 646

7th St NE

618

6th St NE

ta na 0 520 Av e NE

2620

400

326

Girard St NE

2600

306

M on

2700

422

600

2804

5th St NE

c Lin

d nR

2818

2832

WASHINGTON, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE PLANNING

0.09

0.18 Miles

WWW.MPDC.DC.GOV/RESEARCH - HTTP://CRIMEMAP.DC.GOV

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

1700

Eag le N est Rd N E

1100

0.2

902

660

24th St NE

26th St NE

800

21st St NE

NE 720

800

20th St NE NE

566

25th Pl

Wat erw ays

51 0

500

2316

506

5D - Zon e 3

24th St

510

250 0

PSA

500

600

580

DIST RICT S

23rd Pl N E

20th St 2000

1100 1020 NE

830

718 7 40

620 70 0

19th St

710

0.1

2146

G S t NE Legend 2100 Ben n in g R d N EDC ST REET S 1 NE 95 0

ale S t NE NE 200

E S t NE

1714

Ro se d 182 6

0 211

500

F St

8 210

1914

170 0

612 624

Kr am er St NE ale S 160 0 t NE 1

P l NE NE Gales S t NE

0 211

6 210

0 191

812

1800

180 0

Gales

4 210

H St NE 1900 NE Bennett Pl NE

750

170 4

NE 1626

H Pl NE NE

0 200

900

0 181

21st Pl NE

1210

19th St NE

1000

K St NE

1638

1818

18th St NE

902

814

NE 512

DATA S OURCE : MP D DI ST RI CT, P S A & S TREE T CE NTE RLI NE GE OSPAT IA L DATA SOURCE: M etropolit an P olic e Department (M PD) dat a as of 05/08/ 2013

18th Pl NE

L St NE 1010

17th St NE

1012

1700

1600 NE

M St NE

Lang P l NE

18th St NE

11 2 2

17th Pl NE

1614

E eN Av 170 0 NE nd a 6 l ry E 180 Ma tN E N IS

61 6

1512

1900

1636 1700 NE

161 2

Ro se d

F St NE

NE 1834

Lyman Pl NE

NE 16th St N E NE

702

616

15th St NE

600

18th St NE NE 1210 1700

1716NE

1426

1420

24th St NE

17 50

163 6 44

NE 12

121 6

122 6

101 16 0 th Bl a St d NE NE 100 en s bu 0 104 r g NE 1 Rd 1 24 2

NE 14th Pl NE

1400

50 0

710

108

1810

20 34

NE 173 0

141 r oo k 2 St NE

Ho lb

806 0 1334

152 2

1430 1 50 4

628

14th St NE

1350

Me igs

Zone 3

1300

170 6

164 4

162 0

Or 130 11 0 Stap 01 120 r en 2 31 St 0 8 111 les S NE 140 2 tN 0 130 120 E 0 0 11 0 8 140 1 0 30 120 0 8 140 130 0 0

1232

122 6

F St NE

0 Emerald St NE 1300 NE

E S t NE

140 2

50 0

1300

140 0

Zone 2

507

600

0 130

0 132

1606

151 2

141 0

516

1210 1226

11 0 8

111 0

104

538 604 608

Linden Ct NE

622

20 30

19 16

19 06

166 0

161 6

131 St 2 N 133 E 2

1334 1360 NE

First District

1208

131 0

Le v is

134 2

824 728

1300

708

1200

NE ve 0 d A 120

131 0

150 0

134 8

et R

Fifth District

130 0

150 0

13th St NE

19 00

170 0

17 00

NE Pl NE

e 142 ll o Av 4 e

NE 0

1200

NE 0

500

140 Mo n t 0

131 6 121 6

120 8 111 6

an r yl Ma 28

107

H St NE

NE Linden Pl NE

606 656

1102

12th St NE

0 800

NE 900

1100

0 100

1200

132 1300 4 0

1204

600 612

1004

126 N E 6

1000

se S

130 2

Wylie St NE

912

I St NE

714

726

11th St NE

800

632

1000

G S t NE 900

818

900

800

1000

tN E

Mo r

l iv

10th St NE

518

928

NE 910

K St NE

1 E Oa 20 8 tes 121 St N 0 E

120 Nea lS 4

F 11 2 l or 8 1 i da 20 0 Ave 1122 121 NE 6

500

0 1010

126 2

nt O

Rd N

900

en P

i lto n

am Mt H

NE St n d 900 22

100 0 0

121 t N 8 E

121 NE 4

503

111 4

Qu ee nS

Pe nn

130 0

111 4

18 28

18 08

to NE lA NE ve 17 N 00 E

Ca pi

11t h

NE ve A in ia i rg W es tV

Li n c

11 0 6

ei g

s 120 P l NE 8

520

O E N

NE Cir ol n

111 2 11 0 6

506

18 34

ki e

111 St 0 N

11 0 Ho 0 lb r oo 11 2 k T er 0 NE 11 0 4 121 0

Mo u

NE 122 ms 2 Pl N

S 121 t N E 2 126 M

2404

2200

R St NE 2116 2200 NE

Sim

Ra um

Rand P l NE NE

Azalea Rd NE

122 0

172 2

Pk w oo d w Br en t

36 19

Zone 1

S S t NE NE

2200 2114

i tz er Dr NE

10 17

th 15

ai g Cr

95 0

2 E 182 lN al P n tr Ce 181 4

505

NE St 3 2 18

tS de l lau 0 Ga 190

2 182 NE St al l nd Ke 0 Cor cor an S t NE 190 180 6 1800 NE

95 0

E tN 0

E tN

ie S Ok

k wi c Fen NE

E tN

ie S Ok 5 0

0 200

NE St 9th

k Yor 0 New 123

E eN Av

Tr 150 i n id 8 1 ad 60 Av 0 e

WASHING TON, DC METROPOL ITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 2013 SUMMER CRIME INITIATIV E P LANNING

0.4 Miles

CR E AT ED BY: SE AN E. GOOD ISO N

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

WASHINGTON, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE PLANNING

NE 0 440

0 49

E 0

4900

1204

1220

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

NE 1012

1000

0 Waterways

0.1

1104

1100

48th Pl NE

1014

1100

1022

47th St NE

PSA

Lee St NE

4612 DISTRICTS

4908

4408

1010

4800

1100

1118

47th Pl NE

1104

CREATED BY: SEAN E. GOODISON RESEARCH & ANALYSIS BRANCH - 300 INDIANA AVE NW - ROOM 4048 - WASHINGTON, DC 20001

4700

DC STREETS

NE 46th S t

DATA SOURCE: MPD DISTRICT, PSA & STREET CENTERLINE GEOSPATIAL DATA SOURCE: Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) data as of 4/23/2013

48th St NE

4608

49th St NE

1202

Meade St NE

4513

1020

4500

1016

1132

Legend

1114

NE 45th S t 1008

45th P l

1008

1010

NE NE 0

47th Pl NE

E NE Av eN

0 46

rth

4912

1000

Ke ni lw o

Nash St NE

N N

48 1

1300

e Av

rth

o es

15 0

n in M

44th S t

1010

Ke ni lw o

4210

E Av eN

1318

45th Pl NE

44th St NE 1236

Na sh

4408

602

4200

Zone 2

1200

4400

1224

1220

42nd Pl NE

14 0

1414

NE NE

ia 430 Ave NE 0

cos t Ana 1220 1204

4444

4422

1100

42nd St NE

4426

Lane Pl NE

4256

4400

4258

4240

4210

Q ua rle s

4248

NE 0

lk Po

4200

Meade St NE

4244

47 0

Sixth District

Ord St NE

4328

4314

Nash St NE

4212

Av eN Ke ni lw o

4336

4312

Marne Pl NE

Av eN

or th 15 Ken 14 ilw

45t 150 0

Polk St NE

0 E 144

450 0

601

e liv O

1 16

e Av

Zone 1

n er st Ea

St N

E N S t 612 4

Do ugl as

s rle ua 2 Q 460

432 6

45 t N 38 E

rth

432 0

Qu ar les S

0 16

St N

151 4

h 150 St N 8 E

Po n

16 1

44 0

0.2 Miles

WWW.MPDC.DC.GOV/RESEARCH - HTTP://CRIMEMAP.DC.GOV

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

WASHINGTON, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 2013 SUMMER CRIME INITIATIVE PLANNING

3208

29 2

SE 3022

3222

22nd St SE

2920

2 20 0

SE 34 0

340 0

22nd St SE

3508

15th St SE

3400

SE 1 90 6 Sa va 187 0 nn 19 ah 00 T er SE

P 0 14 l S 36 E 15th Pl SE 3246 3134

ma nR

re ss Co ng 1352

SE 14t hP

l SE

3236

3310

Tu b

12 th St S

Maple Sq SE

Br uc e

3200

13th St SE

0 23

0 22

2100

Legend

DISTRICTS PSA

3520

Waterways 30 6

SE 2 3

3402

24th St SE

St SE 21st

3432 0

3004

3110

Sycamore Dr SE

22nd St SE

0 SE 135

St th 13 6

3 12

SE 6 vd 400 Bl

n er

e Av

le Co

t SE

DC STREETS SE

E lS rP 4 hle E 101 a W S

2 0

0 200

t yS r ne Va

3500

1 34

40 0

1900

E er S ey T 1900 Val l

0 180

3400

Ü St

St S

2 13

0 90

0 240

Zone 3

E eS Av

Zone 1

23 rd

SE SE St SE ah n n SE va Sa 00

2000

1900

0 177

950

SE 19th St

1710

h ut So

1900

E n Pl S Trento 1810

1000

e SE y Av Val le E SE Ln S SE y ne k Bla SE

0 340

3510 SE 0

i ipp iss ss i M

t SE

0 342

2 13

tS Tremon

Irving Pl SE SE

E SE t Ct S s cre e g Rid

1920

1910

0 181

SE Pl ah

0 SE

0 171

0 161

Zone 2

330

4 144

2 17

2 33

33 0

0 150 E S

k Dr

120

E Pl S ton 00 Tren 12

Coo

SE 12th St

3308 3326

E 11th Pl S

3314

36 3310 33

SE 10th Pl

SE l SE ith P

4 144

SE s St gres Con 8 SE

1100

700

9t h

1400

l SE 12th P

3212

t SE nah S Savan 1100 SE

4 72

706

E Dr S SE

3214

E 9th Pl S

Rd SE Wheeler 3300

3210

E 8th St S

00 810 9

750

704

Seventh District

705

an Rd Tubm 0

hS 18t 0

n Rd

Oa k

ood Dogw

Shippen Ln

SE 12 800 8

n van Sa

8 211

3330

ve SE ma A Alaba 900

Tobias Dr SE

t Tanner S

800

37 0

Bruce Pl SE

Po pl ar S

31 5

2000

1350

to Stan

Pecan St SE

703

718

l SE Jasper P

Stanton Ter SE

Irving St SE SE

28 5

14 0

2400

w Pk

Hartford St SE

d an itl Su

Jasper Rd SE

21st St SE

20th St SE

8 301

1824

702

3136

302 0

2606

2392

2524

Elvans R d

253 4

Gainesville St SE

2400

15th Pl SE SE

SE Pomeroy Rd SE

2420

6 290

2500

DATA SOURCE: MPD DISTRICT, PSA & STREET CENTERLINE GEOSPATIAL DATA SOURCE: Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) data as of 05/08/2013

0.1

0.2

0.4 Miles

CREATED BY: SEAN E. GOODISON

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

APPENDIX L: OCSI 2013 YOUTH SURVEY RESULTS CHARACTERISTICS OF YOUTH SURVEY RESPONDENTS TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES (N=4,311)

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES

Gender/Sex

TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES (N=4,311)

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES

Elementary School or Below

2,049

14%

Middle School

2,972

20%

High School

9,921

66%

College

<1%

Education Level

Female

2,351

55%

Male

1,892

45%

No response

–

Age Group Younger Youth (5–12 years)

1,929

45%

Some College

<1%

Older Youth (13–18 years)

1,908

45%

No response

3,028

–

Young Adults (19–24 years)

421

10%

No response

–

Prior Program Participant

Youth Ward

Yes

10,426

58%

7,589

42%

Participant in More Than One 2013 OCSI Program

277

Yes

2,334

55%

1,890

45%

No response

–

401

13%

424

14%

353

11%

708

23%

819

26%

No Response

1,189

–

Asian/Pacific Islander 68

Black/African American

3,392

81%

Hispanic/Latino

279

White

Other

309

No response

141

Ethnicity/Race American Indian/ Alaska Native

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

YOUTH SURVEY RESULTS – ACTIVITIES PROVIDED TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES (N=4,311)

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES

TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES (N=4,311)

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES

Learning Opportunities

Satisfaction

“In this program I got to try new things.”

Like Coming to Program

A lot

2,470

58%

Always

2,589

63%

A little

1,453

35%

Sometimes

1,381

34%

Not at all

309

Never

136

No response

–

No response

205

–

“In this program I got to go new places.”

Recommend Program to a Friend

A lot

1,940

47%

Yes

A little

1,502

36%

Not at all No response

722 147

3,022

73%

Maybe

909

22%

17%

235

–

No response

145

–

“In this program I got to make friends.” A lot

2,679

64%

A little

1,245

30%

Not at all No response

248 139

6% –

“In this program I got to talk with adults about what’s going on in my life.” A lot

1,474

36%

A little

1,443

35%

Not at all

1,221

29%

No response

173

–

“In this program I got to work at a job that I liked.” A lot

1,554

38%

968

24%

1,535

38%

A little Not at all No response

254

–

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

YOUTH SURVEY RESULTS – YOUTH OUTCOMES TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES (N=4,311)

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES

TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES (N=4,311)

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES

Workforce Development

Academic Achievement

“After participating in the summer program, I can talk about careers that I am interested in.”

“After participating in the summer program, I better understand the importance of going to college.”

A lot

2,095

50%

A lot

2,552

62%

A little

1,427

34%

A little

1,015

25%

Not at all

648

16%

Not at all

554

13%

No response

141

–

No response

190

–

“After participating in the summer program, I know the steps needed to reach my career goals.”

“After participating in the summer program, I know the steps needed to go to college (ex. SAT/ ACT, admissions, FAFSA).”

A lot

2,208

53%

A lot

1,923

47%

A little

1,378

33%

A little

1,250

30%

Not at all

566

14%

Not at all

949

23%

No response

159

–

No response

189

–

“After participating in the summer program, I know the skills needed for employment (ex. resumes, time management) the activity.”

A lot

1,971

47%

A little

1,271

30%

31%

Not at all

875

21%

20%

No response

194

–

“In the summer program, I have learned how to read and write better.”

A lot

2,015

49%

A little

1,254

Not at all

840

No response

202

“After participating in the summer program, I can name at least two supports and/or resources that will help me go to college.”

“I am sure that I will be able to find a job that I enjoy.”

A lot

1,842

45%

A little

1,250

30%

Yes

3,286

81%

Not at all

1,040

25%

Maybe

656

16%

No response

179

–

139

No response

230

–

“In the summer program, I have learned how to be better at math and science.”

“I am sure that I will be able to do well in a job I have.” Yes

3,361

83%

Maybe

525

13%

174

No response

251

–

A lot

1,585

38%

A little

1,160

28%

Not at all

1,369

33%

No response

197

–

“In the summer program, I have learned how to use computers and technology better.” A lot

1,789

44%

A little

1,072

26%

Not at all

1,216

30%

No response

234

–

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES (N=4,311)

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES

“In the summer program, I have learned where to go if I need help in school.”

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES

Healthy Lifestyles

A lot

1,889

46%

“The summer program has helped me to be motivated to learn new things.”

A little

1,154

28%

A lot

2,464

58%

Not at all

1,027

25%

A little

1,429

34%

No response

241

–

Not at all

325

“I am sure that I will finish high school.”

No response

–

Yes

3,567

87%

Maybe

364

“The summer program has helped me to feel happy with myself.”

148

No response

232

–

“I am sure that I will finish college.” Yes

3,237

79%

Maybe

640

16%

196

No response

238

–

A lot

2,756

66%

A little

1,111

26%

Not at all

330

No response

114

–

“The summer program has helped me to feel positive about my future.” A lot

2,840

68%

A little

1,041

25%

Not at all

310

No response

120

–

“The summer program has helped me to be healthier (ex. eat better and exercise more).” A lot

2,264

53%

A little

1,225

28%

Not at all

593

14%

No response

229

–

“In the summer program, I have learned how to make good choices about the foods I eat.” A lot

2,019

50%

A little

1,215

30%

Not at all

844

21%

No response

233

–

“In the summer program, I have learned how to do physical activities that I like.” A lot

2,268

56%

A little

1,081

27%

Not at all

719

18%

No response

243

–

“In the summer program, I have learned how to deal with stress.”

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

A lot

1,712

42%

A little

1,282

32%

Not at all

1,043

26%

No response

274

–

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES (N=4,311)

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES

“In the summer program, I have learned how to resist negative peer pressure.” A lot

2,022

51%

A little

1,189

30%

Not at all

753

19%

No response

347

–

“In the summer program, I have learned how to say ‘no’ to alcohol, drugs, and other things that are not good for me.” A lot

2,481

62%

A little

725

18%

Not at all

766

19%

No response

339

–

TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES (N=4,311)

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL YOUTH RESPONSES

Safety and Structure “After participating in the summer program, I better understand the importance of helping others in my community.” A lot

2,318

56%

A little

1,353

33%

Not at all

486

12%

No response

154

–

“After participating in the summer program, I know the different rules and laws in my community.” A lot

2,139

52%

A little

1,363

33%

Not at all

615

15%

No response

194

–

“In the summer program, I have learned how to respect people who are different from me.” A lot

2,457

61%

A little

1,098

27%

Not at all

481

12%

No response

275

–

“In the summer program, I have learned how to share my ideas with others.” A lot

2,123

52%

A little

1,351

33%

Not at all

574

14%

No response

263

–

“In the summer program, I have learned how to deal with my feelings in a proper way.” A lot

2,036

50%

A little

1,303

32%

Not at all

727

18%

No response

245

–

Feel safe at program Always

3,169

75%

Sometimes

911

22%

Never

132

No response

–

Do not reproduce without permission of the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation

FINDINGS FROM SUMMER 2013: APPENDIX

ÂŠ 2013 DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation 1400 16th Street, NW | Suite 500 | Washington, DC 20036 Tel: 202-347-4441 www.cyitc.org