RISAM JOHNSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE STUDENT, ASU
971-307-3018 | RIS.F.JOHNSON@GMAIL.COM 625 W 1ST ST, APT 109, TEMPE, AZ, 85281 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. HYBRID HAND- AND PHOTOSHOP- RENDERED SITE PLAN, SOTO RESIDENCE 2. HAND-RENDERED PLANTING PLAN, SOTO RESIDENCE 3. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED SITE PLAN, GROWING GREENER EDUCATION 4. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED SECTION-ELEVATIONS, GROWING GREENER EDUCATION 5. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED PERSPECTIVE, GROWING GREENER EDUCATION 6. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED PERSPECTIVE, GROWING GREENER EDUCATION 7. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED CONCEPTUAL PLAN, GARFIELD 3 8. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED COMBINATION FIGURE-GROUND, TRANSPORTATION, AND OPEN SPACE, RE-IMAGINING FIESTA MALL 9. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED COMBINATION FIGURE-GROUND, TRANSPORTATION, AND OPEN SPACE, RE-IMAGINING FIESTA MALL 10. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED COMBINATION FIGURE-GROUND, TRANSPORTATION, AND OPEN SPACE, RE-IMAGINING FIESTA MALL 11. ALFA OMEGA SCHOOL CASE STUDY 12. SHATTERED GLASS, OJO DE ORO BAT HABITAT 13. AUTO-CAD RENDERED SITE AND DRAINAGE PLAN, GERN’S VEGAN TREATS 14. AUTO-CAD RENDERED SITE PLAN, ELEVATION, AND OBLIQUE PROJECTION, VALLEY METRO SHADE STRUCTURE 15. AUTO-CAD RENDERED PLANTING PLAN, GARFIELD 3
1. HYBRID HAND- AND PHOTOSHOP- RENDERED SITE PLAN, SOTO RESIDENCE
2. HAND-RENDERED PLANTING PLAN, SOTO RESIDENCE
Alameda GI | LID Concepts Plan Johnson Design Proposal 4 December, 2020
3. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED SITE PLAN, GROWING GREENER EDUCATION
4. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED SECTION-ELEVATIONS, GROWING GREENER EDUCATION
5. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED PERSPECTIVE, GROWING GREENER EDUCATION
6. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED PERSPECTIVE, GROWING GREENER EDUCATION
7. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED CONCEPTUAL PLAN, GARFIELD 3
8. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED COMBINATION FIGURE-GROUND, TRANSPORTATION, AND OPEN SPACE, RE-IMAGINING FIESTA MALL
9. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED COMBINATION FIGURE-GROUND, TRANSPORTATION, AND OPEN SPACE, RE-IMAGINING FIESTA MALL
10. PHOTOSHOP-RENDERED COMBINATION FIGURE-GROUND, TRANSPORTATION, AND OPEN SPACE, RE-IMAGINING FIESTA MALL
A
Ri sam
hie arc
d/
Jo hn so n|
.i ch l.s oo ch as
LD E3
63
|3
eg m fao
/al
1A ug
:/ tp ht
us t, 2
02
0
lfa Omega School
Tangerang, Indonesia RAW Architecture
Site Challenges > Site Solutions
Sited on former swamp > The structure was built on stilts Local climate is hot and humid > Open structure for cross-ventilation Rainy season brings torrential rain > Woven roofs cover above and to the side The school had a tight budget > Used local workmanship and materials
11. ALFA OMEGA SCHOOL CASE STUDY
Risam Johnson Christensen and Hargrove LDE 262 4/1/2020
Broken
Glass
1.
2.
3.
7.
6.
5.
4.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Goldmeyer Project
12. SHATTERED GLASS, OJO DE ORO BAT HABITAT
1236
∠S5°33'44"W PUE
36
12
C
+T
℄
16.00'
38
5.
23
+F L1
+1 36 .1 23 .62 2 6
+B TC C 12 1236 +B 36 .2 TC C .76 6 12 1236
2%
2.9%
0.6%
eb
26
+F L1 23 5.
12 36 +B36 .1 TC C .66 6 12 1236 36 .0 .5 2 2
+B TC C 12
12 37 36.6 .1 3 3
+B TC C 12
re
+F
oa
rd
12
30
+F S12
.0
36
1
6
.6 7
.3
36
+F S12
S12 36 +F .2 S12 1 36 .1 0 +F S12
+F
2
.0
+F S12
.0
36
1
36 +F .2 2 S12 36 .1 1
.3 6 +F S12
36
+F S12
S12
+F
7
S12 36 .6
.0 2
37
S12
+F
+F
3.5%
37
36
S12
+F
0.1%
+F S12
39 0.1% 31 cf 0.1% s
0.
12 36 36.3 .8 6 6
+B TC C 12
1.6%
5
23
L1
+F
12 37 37.0 .5 0 0
+B TC C 12
12 36 36.0 .5 0 0
96
4.
+1 +F23 L15 23
+B TC C 12 1235 +B 36 .6 TC C .19 9 12 +11236 35 23 .0 .5 6 8 8
+B TC C 12
12 36 36.4 .9 1 1
+B TC C 12
2%
8"
0.6% 1.6%
0.6%
7
ft
5
23
+1
12 35 +B36 .5 TC C .07 7 12 1235 35 .4 .9 6 6
+B TC C 12
12 36 36.0 .5 0 0
+B TC C 12
12 36 36.2 .7 6 6
+B TC C 12
0,
.1
12 37 36.5 .0 0 0
+B TC C 12
q
+B TC C 12 1236 37 .6 .1 4 4
+0 B .1 TC C12 25 12 36 ft C 36 .1 C .6 0 12 36 0
+P ip R eS C W P at LP 0. , 10 9% 0
0.1%
123
3.7%
0.6%
0.6%
1.6%
0.6%
1236
0.1%
+B TC C 12 1236 37 .7 .2 8 8
0.6%
28
25
0.
0.6%
s
ft/
+B TC C 12 1237 38 .9 .4 3 3
1.6%
.7
35
0
.7
35
0
e
rd
lin
er
at
W
22
55
0.
s
ft/
+
V
IN
IN
3.00'
7
.9
32
43
60
0.
s
ft/
7
12
33
34 12
35 12
ROW
1230 31 12 1232 1233 34 12 1235
.9
30
P12
+L
6 123
12
Sidewalk
q
,q
05
.8
37
36 12
37 12
1238
1239
5
23
+T C1
PL
123
5
Catch Basin Rim
N
B 123 Thorn Harvester Dr. Chandler, AZ 85683
Owned By: Risam Workshard 123 Mi Escritorio Tempe, AZ 85281
2% 0.5%
Peak Run Off Rate Reinforced Concrete Pipe
Gern's Vegan Treats
7
7
.9
.9
31
32
12
12
1235
h
ig
+H
1,
.5
+B TC C 12 1237 37 .0 .5 0 0
12 38 37.5 .0 0 0
+B TC C 12
12 38 37.7 .2 3 3
2
.4
39
S12
+F
+B TC C 12 1238 39 .5 .0 0 0
+0 B .3 TC C12 02 12 37 15 38 .8 ft C .3 05 C 05 12
+B TC C 12
2
.6
+B TC C 12 1238 39 .9 .4 3 3
ft
35
12
5
99
IN
.8
V
IN
+B TC C 12 1238 38 .0 .5 0 0
8
.4
39
S12
+F
+0 B .2 TC C12 761 12 36 ft 37 .5 CC .0 1 12 1 36
oa
eb
re
+F
+
+P ip R eN C P WD at Y 2. , 36 0%
12 39 39.0 .5 0
+B TC C 12
6"
Pipe
Project Name:
232.78' ∠N89°52'19"E
1235 1236
.3 4
34
e
lin
er
P12
at
W
+L
h
ig
+H
30
12
q
0.1%
8 123
7 123
8
23
+1
8
0.1%
23
+1
ft
+B TC C C 12 1239 IN B 39 IN V RIM .5 .04 V IN 12 4 O 12 39 U 35 .0 T 12 .8 4 36 9 .0 4
12 40 39.5 .0 0 0
+B TC C 12
2
.6
33
P12
+L
226.36' ∠N0°2'37"E
+B TC C 12 1236 37 .5 .0 0 0
+B TC C 12 1236 37 .7 .2 8 8
0.6%
+ TC BC 0. 12 12 26 36 36 2 .3 ft .84 4 C C 12 36 .3 4,
+B TC C 12
12 37 37.0 .5 6 6
12 37 36.8 .3 9 9
+B TC C 12
9
0.1% 0.6%
2
96
.4
2
.6
2
.6
34
12
35
12
30 45 60
0.1%
9
+B TC C C 12 1236 IN B 37 IN V RIM .3 .87 V IN 12 8 O 12 36 U 33 .8 T 12 .8 7, 0.1% 33 7 q 1. .8 01 7 55 0.1% +F cf S12 s +F S12 37 .3 37 9 .3
12 38 37.5 .0 0 0
123 +B TC C 12
+B TC C 12 1238 38 .0 .5 0 0
0.6% 1.6%
+P ip R eN C P WD at Y 0. , 62 6%
12 38 38.0 .5 7 7
+B TC C 12
6"
12 40 39.6 .1 1 1
e
lin
rd
oa
er
at
eb
re
W
1240
1 1.5 2
0
+B TC C 12 1236 37 .6 .1 0 0
7
23 +B TC C 12 1237 37 .0 .5 4 4
12 39 38.5 .0 0 0
+B TC C 12
10.00' 12 39 39.0 .5 0 0
+B TC C 12
Sidewalk
+B TC C 12
1240
h
+F
ig
+H
0
.5
39
S12
+F
6
.0
39
S12
0
1.6%
+1
0.6%
12 37 37.1 .6 0 0
+B TC C 12
1.6%
7
12 37 37.0 .5 0 0
+1 23 7
ft
0.1%
23
+B TC C 12
+P ip R eN C P WH at P 1. , 80 6%
12 38 37.5 .0 0 0
+B TC C 12
+1
12 37 37.0 .5 0 0
0.6%
1.6%
5
.6
39
S12
+F
5
.6
39
S12
+F
0
+B .8 TC C 0 12 1239 39 .3 .8 1 1
.8
+B TC C 12 1239 40 .6 .1 7 7
+B TC C 12 1239 39 .2 .7 9 9
1.6%
0
.8
39
4
.8
39
S12
S12
+F
+F
0.1%
39
39
S12
S12
+F
+F
3
.8
8
.3
0
.5
39
S12
+F
+F
C
0.1%
0.1%
4
S12 39 .6
+F
4
9
.7
39
+F S12
S12 39 .6
+F
0.1% 0.1% 32 18 +F S12 39 .7 9
0.
+F 39
S12
+F
39 S12 .82 39 .7 8
S12
+F
4%
39
S12
+F
2%
0
.5
39
S12
+F
Scale: 1:30
PL
439.47' +B +F +F TC C S12 S12 C 12 12 +B 38 IN B R 38 38.1 TC C 38 .6 V IM .6 65 .6 12 1238 0.1% 8 O 12 65 8 38 .1 U T 38 +F 0.1% .6 85 12 .1 S 85 +F 35 65 12 S12 .1 , q 38 65 0. .6 38 53 8 .6 30 +B 8 TC C +F +F 12 1238 +B S12 38 .0 S12 TC C .5 9 38 12 1238 38 9 .6 38 .1 .6 8 .6 1 8 1
12 39 38.5 .0 0 0
12 39 39.0 .5 0 0
+B TC C 12
+B TC C 12 1239 39 .2 .7 9 9
+B TC C C 12 12 IN B R 39 39.2 V IM .7 7 O 12 7 U T 39 12 .2 36 7, .2 q 7
+B TC C 12 12 40 39.6 .1 5 5
2
5
.6
39
S12
+F
2%
230.09' ∠N0°0'0"E
+B TC C 12
+B TC C 12 1237 37 .1 .6 4 4
0.6% 1.6%
2
.9
6
.8
39
40
S12
CB RIM
12 37 37.2 .7 5 5
6"
38
2
.3
39
6
S12
.9
39
+F
40
S12
+F
RET Retention Basin
+B TC C 12
0.6%
12
12 39 .9
2%
40
S12
Watershed
1.6%
e
lin
er
rd
oa
eb
re
.5
4
.9
39
4
+F
.9
39
S12
+F
Catch Basin Rim
Finished Grade
+B TC C 12 1237 38 .5 .0 0 0
at
W
2
39
.4
S12
+F
39
12
G
+F +F S12
2%
40
S12
+F
S12
+F
0
.5
39
S12
Flow Line
+B TC C 12 1238 38 .0 .5 0 0
12 38 38.2 .7 9 9
+B TC C 12
2
+B TC C 12
.9
37
P12
1239
+L
1238
h
ig
+H
+F
S +F1240 S12
+F
FFE1240
+F
PL
RCP
0.1% 0.6%
s
.5
4
.9
39
S12
+F 40
S12
+F
2%
0
.5
39
S12
+F
Low Point of Basin Finished Surface Q
+B TC C 12 1238 38 .4 .9 7 7
+B TC C 12 1238 38 .4 .9 3 3
ft/
39
+F
+F +F FG S12 FG S12 12 40 12 40 39.5 39 .5
0
.0
39
12
Proposed Contour
12 +B 39 38.5 TC C12.00 0 12 38 39 .4 .0 5 45
+B TC C 12
0.6%
94
12
+F G
40 .5
39
+F FG S12 12
1
8 123 239
PS
+H
+FG
1.6%
12
+B TC C 12 1239 40 .7 .2 9 9
0.
.5
+F S12 40 39 +F +F .98 S12 S12 40 39 .9 8
S12
39
40 39 .5
+F FG S12 12
1237
2
.4
36
P12
+L
Finished Grade
12 39 39.0 .5 0 0
+B TC C 12
12 40 39.5 .0 0 0
0.1% 0.6%
q
12
+F
+F G
2%
.3 2
+F FG S12 12 40 39 .5
2%
2
2
.4
.4
38
37
12
12
CB RIM
12 40 39.6 .1 7 7
+B TC C 12 08 1239 39 63 .9 .49 ft 9 C C 12 39 .4 9,
+B TC C 12 1240 40 .0 .5 2 2
0.
6
.5
39
12
G
+F
6
.3
39
S12
12 44 38.8 .8 0 0 +F
+B TW W 12
2, q 0. 46 +B 44 ft/ TW W s 12 1238 44 .7 .7 9 9
+B TC C 12 30 1238 38 96 .9 .42 ft 2 C C 12 38 .4
0.
e
rd
lin
oa
er
at
eb
re
W
Prosopis chilensis
12 40 39.5 .0 3 3
0.6%
12 39 39.4 .9 7 7
+B TC C 12
.3
39
+F S12
39
S12
+F
12 39 38.7 .2 9 9
+B TC C 12
12 44 38.9 .9 8 8
+B TW W 12
12 44 38.9 .9 7 7
+B TW W 12
h
+F
ig
+H
PL
+FS
+B TC C 12
1240
2.7%
0.6%
0.1%
0.6%
2
S12 39 .1
+F
1242
12 39 38.8 .3 0 0
+B TC C 12
12 40 39.5 .0 0 0
+B TC C 12
+B TC C 12 1240 40 .0 .5 1 1
1
+LP
+B TC C 12 1240 40 .1 .6 6 6 +B TC C 12 1240 40 .0 .5 0 0
+B TC C 12 1240 40 .0 .5 0 0
12 40 39.6 .1 3 3
2.7%
12 39 39.0 .5 0 0
+B TC C 12
0.1%
5%
124
PL
Parkinsonia Aculeata
+B TC C 12
12 40 39.6 .1 4 4
+B TC C 12
+B TC C 12 1239 40 .5 .0 0 0
12 39 39.0 .5 0 0
+B TC C 12
12 39 38.5 .0 0 0
+B TC C 12 1239 39 .0 .5 4 4
0
4 12
1243
+B TC C 12 1239 40 .5 .0 0 0
12 40 40.0 .5 3 3
+B TC C 12
40
12
1242
Prosopis sp.
+B TC C 12
+B TC C 12 1238 39 .8 .3 1 1 +B TC C 12
43
12
165 Trees to Place
+B TC C 12
PL
PL
165.81'
+FG
40
41
Parking Spots ADA Parking Spots
12
Retention Basin +FFE Finished Floor Elevation
12
Trees to Keep
40
E ∠S 3 42 6.6 °2 5' 4' 29 F "W 6
12
D Trees to Salvage
1236
50 4 6
40
PUE Curb Property Line / Boundary PUE Existing Contour Sidewalk Pavement Striping Setbacks and Buffers Building Footprint
12
Legend 1234
and Associates
The Aerie Estate, at 00 Aerie Rd. Sedona, AZ 86336
Reviewed by: Date:
Risam Johnson 8 Oct
2020
Risam Johnson 27 Oct Risam Johnson 17 Nov
A Drainage Plan
Page 1 of 1
13. AUTO-CAD RENDERED SITE AND DRAINAGE PLAN, GERN’S VEGAN TREATS
Tensile Fabric Shade
Acacia Aneura
25% Perforated Corrugated Steel
Mixed Groundcovers
South-facing Seating
Risam Johnson This station is one of a handful that is oriented on a NW to SE 45° axis. It's unique position necessitates that the proposed design solution be able to shade almost a 270° arc of area surrounding the structure. The proposed solution combines centrally planted trees with a modular shade canopy made of 25% perforated corrugated steel that stretches the width of the station platform. Central supports allow for centralized seating areas and planters.
Site Plan
LTC 343 Landscape Architecture 1
Justin Azevedo (971) 307-3018 rfjohns6@asu.edu
Priest Dr/Washington St Stop ID: 10019 Tempe, AZ 85281
www.website.com
Address
Owned By
Wires with at least 160° of clearance all around
Valley Metro
Section
Elevation
Basemap
Curb
Priest Dr/ Washington St Station
Station Platform
N 0
20'
40'
2" 0 1" 1 inch = 20 feet *Unless otherwise marked
Not For Construction History
0 30°
5'
1st Draft 17 September, 2020 2nd Draft 21 September, 2020
10'
2" 0 1" 1 inch = 5 feet
30% Oblique Projection
Drawing Basemap Sheet # 1 of 1
14. AUTO-CAD RENDERED SITE PLAN, ELEVATION, AND OBLIQUE PROJECTION, VALLEY METRO SHADE STRUCTURE
15. AUTO-CAD RENDERED PLANTING PLAN, GARFIELD 3