Johnson Portfolio, February 2021

Page 1

RISAM JOHNSON

PORTFOLIO


1 | SOTO RESIDENCE 2 | A STAGE FOR GREENING EDUCATION 3 | GERN’S VEGAN TREATS 4 | NEEB PLAZA REDESIGN

971-307-3018 RIS.F.JOHNSON@GMAIL.COM

RISAM JOHNSON


PLANTING PLAN HAND RENDERED

1 | SOTO RESIDENCE


SITE PLAN COMBINATION HAND GRAPHICS AND PHOTOSHOP RENDER

1 | SOTO RESIDENCE


SITE PLAN PHOTOSHOP RENDERED

Alameda GI | LID Concepts Plan Johnson Design Proposal 4 December, 2020

2 | A STAGE FOR GREENING EDUCATION


SECTION ELEVATION PHOTOSHOP RENDERED

2 | A STAGE FOR GREENING EDUCATION


PERSPECTIVE PHOTOSHOP RENDERED

2 | A STAGE FOR GREENING EDUCATION


1236

W

∠S5°33'44"W 439.47'

5.

23

L1

38

2%

2.9%

26

5.

23

L1

+F

23 +B36 6.16 TC C1.66 12 23 36 6. .5 02 2

+B TC C1 12

30

12

34

e

4.

23

P1

er lin

at

W

+L

ig h

1235 1236

+H

+F

S1

21

S1

S1

36

67

01

6.

6.

70

5.

23

22 11

6.

23

6.

23

S1 S1

0.1%

5.

70

∠N89°52'19"E

23

01

+F

36 +F

6.

23

S1

+F

6.

23

S1

+F

S1

+F

67

6.

23

S1

02

7.

23

S1

+F

+F

232.78'

+F

02

3.5%

7.

6.

23

23

23

S1

S1

+F

+F

23

39 0.1% 31 cf 0.1% s

0.

10 +F

6.

6.

23 23

S1

S1

+F +F

q

0.1%

+ TC BC 0. 12 12 26 36 36 2 .3 ft .84 4 CC 12 36 .3 4,

23 37 7. .5 04 4

23 36 6. .8 36 6

+B TC C1 12

1.6%

+B TC C1 12 23 37 7. .5 06 6

39

5

23

L1

+F

+B TC C1 12 23 37 7. .5 00 0

+B TC C1 12 23 36 6. .5 00 0

23 36 6. .9 41 1

+B TC C1 12

96

4.

+1 +F23 L15 23

2%

8"

0.6% 1.6%

0.6%

7

ft

+B TC C1 12 23 +B36 5.57 TC C1.07 12 23 35 5. .9 46 6

23 36 6. .5 00 0

+B TC C1 12

+B TC C1 12 23 36 6. .7 26 6

0,

.1

23 37 6. .0 50 0

+B TC C1 12

q

23 37 6. .1 64 4

+B TC C1 12

+0 BC .1 TC 12 25 12 36 ft CC 36 .1 .6 0 12 36 0

+P ip RC e SW P at LP 0. , 10 9% 0

0.1%

123

3.7%

0.6%

0.6%

1.6%

0.6%

1236

0.1%

+B TC C1 12 23 37 6. .2 78 8

+B TC C1 12 23 +B 36 5.69 TC C1 .19 +11236 235. 23 .0 58 6 8

8 123

1235

7

7

.9

31

12

.9

32

12

22

55

0.

s

ft/

+

V

IN

IN

3.00'

7

.9

32

97

0.

23

12

33

34 12

35 12

ROW

1230 31 12 1232 1233 34 12 1235

P1

+L

6 123

12

Sidewalk

q

s

ft/

235

C1

+T

PL

123

5

Pipe

230.09'

Catch Basin Rim

N

B 123 Thorn Harvester Dr. Chandler, AZ 85683

Owned By: Risam Workshard 123 Mi Escritorio Tempe, AZ 85281

2% 0.5%

Peak Run Off Rate Reinforced Concrete Pipe

Gern's Vegan Treats

s

ft/

e

lin

er

at

W

rd

oa

1,

.5

43

60

0.

1234

Legend

Project Name:

28

25

0.

h

ig

+H

eb

re

+F

+0 BC .2 TC 12 761 12 36 ft 37 .5 CC .0 1 12 1 36

,q

05

.8

37

37

36 12

12

1238

1239

226.36'

∠N0°2'37"E

+F

+B TC C1 12 23 +B 36 6.26 TC C1 .76 12 23 +1 36 6.12 23 .62 6

+B TC C1 12 23 37 6. .0 50 0

0.6%

+F re eb oa +B rd TC C1 12 12 23 30 37 6. .1 63 3

7

23 37 6. .2 78 8

23 +B TC C1 12

7 23 37 6. .3 89 9

+B TC C1 12

23 37 7. .5 00 0

+B TC C1 12

23 38 7. .0 50 0

+B TC C1 12

23 38 7. .2 73 3

23

42

9.

23

S1

+F

23 39 8. .4 93 3

39 8. .0 50 0

+0 BC .3 TC 12 0215 12 37 ft 38 .8 CC .3 05 12 05

+B TC C1 12

2

.6

+B TC C1 12

+B TC C1 12

23 38 8. .5 00 0

+B TC C1 12

48

9.

23

S1

+F

ft

35

12

5

99

IN

.8

V

IN

30 45 60

+B TC C1 12

0.6%

0.6%

23 37 7. .6 10 0

+B TC C1 12

+1 +B TC C1 CB 12 23 IN 37 6. IN V RIM .3 87 V IN 12 8 O 12 36 UT 33 .8 12 .8 7, 0.1% 33 7 q 1. .8 01 7 55 0.1% +F cf S1 s +F 23 S1 7. 23 39 7.

7 123

+B TC C1 12 23 38 7. .4 93 3

+

+P ip RC e NW P at DY 2. , 36 0%

23 39 9. .5 00

+B TC C1 12

6"

62

3.

23

P1

+L

0

1.6%

+1 23 7

23

+B TC C1 12 23 37 7. .5 00 0

9

1.6%

0.6%

0.6%

+B TC C1 CB 12 23 IN 39 9. IN V RIM .5 04 V IN 12 4 O 12 39 UT 35 .0 12 .8 4 36 9 .0 4

23 40 9. .0 50 0

+B TC C1 12

1240

9. 06

23

S1

+F

1 1.5 2

0.1%

0.6%

23 38 7. .0 50 0

123 +B TC C1 12

8

23

+1

8

0.1%

23

+1

ft

2

.6

2

.6

34

12

35

12

50

9.

23

S1

+F

50

9.

23

S1

+F

9. 50

23

S1

+F

Scale: 1:30

+B TC C1 12 23 37 6. .1 60 0

0.1%

ft

1.6%

+1

+B TC C1 12 23 37 7. .5 00 0

+B TC C1 12 23 37 7. .6 14 4

0.6% 1.6%

0.1%

0.1% 0.6%

2

96

.4

e

lin

rd

oa

er

at

eb

re

W

50

9.

23

S1

+F

2%

94

9.

23

S1

0

16.00'

+B TC C1 12 23 37 7. .7 25 5

23 38 7. .0 50 0

23 38 7. .0 50 0

+B TC C1 12

0.6% 1.6%

ip RC e NW P at DY 0. , 62 6%

+B TC C1 12 23 38 8. .5 07 7

6"

+P

23 40 9. .1 61 1

h

+F

ig

+H

2%

0

0

+F 24

S1

+F

2%

PL

C

+P ip RC e NW P at HP 1. , 80 6%

38 8. .5 00 0

23

+B TC C1 12

+B TC C1 12

1240

65

9.

23

S1

+F

0

24

S1

+F

24

S1

+F

+F +F FG S1 FG S1 12 24 12 24 39.5 0 39 0 .5

50

9.

23

S1

+F

Watershed

+B TC C1 12

6"

23 39 8. .0 50 0

+B TC C1 12

23 39 9. .5 00 0

10.00'

Sidewalk +B TC C1 12

+B +F +F TC C1 S1 S1 CB 12 23 23 +B 23 8. 38 8. TC C1 8. 68 V RIM .6 16 68 12 23 0.1% O 12 65 5 38 8. UT 38 0.1% .6 18 12 .1 +FS1 85 5 +F 35 65 23 S1 .1 , q 8. 65 0. 68 23 8. 53 68 30 +B TC C1 +F +F 12 23 +B S1 S1 38 8. TC C1 23 23 .5 09 12 23 8. 9 8. 68 38 8. 68 .6 11 1 IN

1.6%

65

9.

23

S1

+F

65

9.

23

S1

+F

80

9.

23 40 9. .1 67 7

+B TC C1 12

+B TC C1 12 23 39 9. .7 29 9

1.6%

+B 80 TC C1 12 23 39 9. .8 31 1 9.

23

23

S1

+F

S1

+F

0.1%

84 80

9.

23

9.

23

S1

S1

+F

+F

86

9.

0

24

S1

9

0

.0

39

12

PS

+H

∠N0°0'0"E

23 38 8. .5 00 0

+B TC C1 12

+B TC C1 12 23 38 8. .7 29 9

0.1%

64

9.

23

S1

+F

79

9.

79

9.

64

9.

23

S1

+F

S1

+F

0.1%

0.1%

83

9.

23

4%

S1 23

96

9.

+F

94

+F 9.

23

S1

+F

24 39 0 .5

+F FG S1 12

123

8 123

CB RIM

0.1% 0.6%

39 8. .0 50 0

+B TC C1 12 23 39 9. .5 00 0

+B TC C1 12 23 39 9. .7 29 9

23

32 18 +F S1 23

+B TC C1 CB 12 23 39 9. V RIM .7 27 O 12 7 UT 39 12 .2 36 7, .2 q 7 0. IN

82

78

9.

S1

+F 9.

23

23

S1

+F

S1

+F

38

9.

23

S1

+F

2%

94

9.

23

S1

+F

+F FG S1 12 24 39 0 .5

1237

42

6.

23

P1

+L

Flow Line

23 38 8. .9 47 7

23 38 8. .9 43 3

+B TC C1 12

0.6% 1.6%

2

.9

+B TC C1 12 23 40 9. .1 65 5

2

.9

39

12

38

12

32

0

24

S1

+F

2

2

.4

.4

38

37

12

12

Catch Basin Rim

23

+B TC C1 12

92

7.

23

P1

+L

1239

e

lin

er

at

W

23 9.

.5

39

S1

42

9.

+F

23

12

G

+F S1

+F

2%

rd

oa

eb

re

+F

S1 +F 24 S10 23

+F

FFE1240

36

9.

+F FG S1 12 24 39 0 .5

2%

e

rd

lin

oa

er

at

eb

re

W

Q

+B TC C1 12 23 +B 39 8. TC C1 .00 50 12 23 39 8. .0 45 45

0.6%

s

23 40 9. .2 79 9

ft/

1238

h

ig

+H

.5

39

12

G

+F

2, q 0. 46 +B 44 ft/ TW W s 12 1238 44 .7 .7 9 9

+B TC C1 23 30 1238 8. 96 .9 42 ft 2 CC 12 38 .4

0.

12 44 38.8 .8 0 0 +F S1 23

+B TW W 12

h

RCP

1.6%

94

12

+B TC C1 12

0.

.5

39

12

+F S1 24 23 +F 0 9. +F 98 S1 S1 24 0 23 9. 98

S1

.5

39

12

+F

G

+F

2%

G

+F

39 8. .2 79 9

23

+B TC C1 12

+B TW W 12 1238 44 .9 .9 8 8

+B TW W 12 1238 44 .9 .9 7 7

+F

ig

+H

PL

Low Point of Basin Finished Surface

23 39 9. .5 00 0

q

36

9.

23

S1

+F

32

23 39 8. .3 80 0

+B TC C1 12

9.

23

S1

+F

40 9. .0 50 0

23

+B TC C1 12

1242

+B TC C1 12 24 40 0. .5 01 1

PL

1

Proposed Contour

+B TC C1 12

+B TC C1 12 23 40 9. .0 50 0

+B TC C1 12 24 40 0. .5 02 2

9,

+B TC C1 23 08 1239 9. 63 .9 49 ft 9 CC 12 39 .4

0.

0.1% 0.6%

0.6%

+B TC C1 12 23 39 9. .9 47 7

+B TC C1 12 23 39 9. .5 00 0

12

9.

23

S1

+F

5%

124

CB RIM

+B TC C1 12 23 40 9. .0 53 3

2.7%

0.6%

0.1%

0.6%

0.1%

40

12

+B TC C1 12 23 40 9. .0 50 0

+B TC C1 12 24 40 0. .5 03 3

40

12

1243

1242

Prosopis chilensis

+B TC C1 12 24 40 0. .6 16 6 +B TC C1 12 24 40 0. .5 00 0

2.7%

1240

+B TC C1 12 23 40 9. .1 63 3

+B TC C1 12 23 40 9. .0 50 0 +B TC C1 12 23 40 9. .1 64 4

23 39 9. .5 00 0

23 39 8. .0 50 0

+B TC C1 12

+B TC C1 12 23 39 9. .5 04 4

43

12

23 39 8. .3 81 1

+B TC C1 12

+B TC C1 12

PL

+FS

+B TC C1 12 23 40 9. .1 67 7

PL

F

+LP

+FG Finished Grade

+T C1 23 6

9"

165 Trees to Place

RET Retention Basin

PUE

PL

4'2

Finished Grade

+B TC C1 12

.6 5'

Parkinsonia Aculeata

+B TC C1 12 24 40 0. .5 00 0

36

+FG

40

3 | GERN’S VEGAN TREATS °2

+FFE Finished Floor Elevation

12

42

Parking Spots ADA Parking Spots

41

Retention Basin

12

∠S

Prosopis sp.

40

E

6 Trees to Keep

12

D

Trees to Salvage

40

50 4

6

12

PUE Curb Property Line / Boundary PUE Existing Contour Sidewalk Pavement Striping Setbacks and Buffers Building Footprint

1236

165.81'

DRAINAGE PLAN

AUTOCAD

The Aerie Estate, at 00 Aerie Rd. Sedona, AZ 86336

Highscape Associates

+1 23 5

Reviewed by: Date:

Risam Johnson 8 Oct

2020

Risam Johnson 27 Oct Risam Johnson 17 Nov

A Drainage Plan

Page 1 of 1


CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AUTOCAD WALL-MOUNTED PIPE HANDRAIL (FOR RAMP ONLY) FENCEPOST WITH 121" OD PIPE HANDRAIL, LEVEL AND PLUMB, 3" CORED HOLE

36"

BUILDING WALL

34" 1" CHAMFER ALL SIDES

1 2" EXPANSION JOINT, PREMOLDED CLOSED CELL POLYETHYLENE MATERIAL WITH SEALANT

GROUTING 4"

36" MIN. FOR RAMP (2) NO. 4 HORIZONTAL REBAR AT TOP OF CHEEKWALL 2" CLEAR FROM TOP OF WALL (ABOVE GRADE), 121" CLEAR FROM SIDES OF WALL/ 18" O.C., TYP.

RAMP OR LANDING PLATFORM 9" 4"

3 4" SMOOTH DOWEL, 15" LONG INTO BUILDING WALL; 9" PVC PIPE SLEEVE ON RAMP SIDE, DOWEL 24" O.C., TYP.

6" REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT

3'-6" MAX.

4" STONE SCREENINGS

CLEAN FILL COMPACT IN 6" LIFTS

FINISHED GRADE

3 4" SMOOTH DOWELS SLEEVED (PVC PIPE) IN RAMP, 36" O.C. 2" CLEAR FROM BOTTOM OF PAVEMENT

3'-6" MIN. NO. 4 VERTICAL REBARS 2" CLEAR FROM TOP 3" CLEAR FROM BOTTOM 121" CLEAR FROM SIDES OF WALL, 24" O.C.

3 4" SMOOTH DOWELS 24" LONG ONE END SLEEVED (PVC PIPE), CENTERED IN WALL, MIN. 2 REQ'D AT EXP. JOINTS 30'-0" O.C. AND ALSO AT BUILDING WALL/PLATFORM/STEPS

NO. 4 HORIZONTAL REBARS 2" CLEAR FROM TOP 3" CLEAR FROM BOTTOM 121" CLEAR FROM SIDES OF WALL, 18" O.C. CONTINUOUS

3.7

4 | NEEB PLAZA REDESIGN

RAMP SECTION NTS

CHEEKWALL, 4000 PSI CONCRETE

DRY, FIRM UNYIELDING SUBGRADE, TYP.

12"


CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

2' x 4' PLANK DECKING

2' x 6' JOIST

4' x 10' BEAM

AUTOCAD

8'-8" 7'-8"

17 SQ FT AREA x 50 PSF LOAD, DEAD AND LIVE = 850#s /SQ FT ÷ 2,500 PSF SOIL BEARING CAPACITY = 0.34 SQ FT ∴ 12" x 12" PER POST 30 SQ FT AREA x 50 PSF LOAD, DEAD AND LIVE = 1,500#s /SQ FT ÷ 2,500 PSF SOIL BEARING CAPACITY = 0.60 SQ FT ∴ 12" x 12" PER POST

4" 12"

5.1

BEAM AND JO 1" = 6"

4" 24"

12" 15' 5.1

WOOD DECK PLAN AND SECTION 1" = 1'

12" Ø

4" x 4" POST

5.1

4 | NEEB PLAZA REDESIGN

WOOD DECK PLAN AND SECTION 1" = 1'

5.1

FOOTING DET 1" = 6"


CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

2' x 6' JOIST

GALVANIZED DECK NAIL, TYP.

4' x 10' BEAM

AUTOCAD

7'-8"

2' x 4' PLANK DECKING 2' x 6' JOIST

17 SQ FT AREA x 50 PSF LOAD, DEAD AND LIVE = 850#s /SQ FT ÷ 2,500 PSF SOIL BEARING CAPACITY = 0.34 SQ FT ∴ 12" x 12" PER POST

4' x 10' BEAM

30 SQ FT AREA x 50 PSF LOAD, DEAD AND LIVE = 1,500#s /SQ FT ÷ 2,500 PSF SOIL BEARING CAPACITY = 0.60 SQ FT ∴ 12" x 12" PER POST

POST CAP BEAM BASE CONNECTOR, SIMPSON STRONG TIE, TYP.

5.1

4" x 4" POST

BEAM AND JOIST CONNECTION DETAIL 1" = 6"

24"

4" x 4' POST 12" Ø

GALVANIZED POST ANCHOR GALVANIZED BOLT/NUT/WASHER CONCRETE PIER, SLOPED TO DRAIN

4" x 4" POST

(2-4)L REINFORCING BARS

(2) HORIZONTAL REINFORCING BARS

4 | NEEB PLAZA REDESIGN

5.1

FOOTING DETAIL 1" = 6"

16"


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.