A
Goal towards Walkability
Manifestation of Micro Planning
Urban Expansion and Regeneration Planning Studio 3rd Semester, Faculty of Planning, CEPT University
by Tamanna Parvin PG191039
Portfolio:3rdSemester,UERPStudio,CEPTUniversity
Preface Studios like UERP are like a bridge between theoretical and practical working. First of all, I would like to thank my parents, whom I am greatly indebted for bringing me up with love and encouragement to this stage. I feel obliged in taking the opportunity to sincerely thank Prof. Jignesh Mehta (Coordinator for UERP Studio, 2020) and special thanks to my Faculty in charge Prof. Harsh Vardhan Bhasin and Teaching Assistant Mrs. Shyamantika Sarkar for their invaluable guidance and inputs. I am also thankful to Prof. Utkarsh Patel & Prof. Amit Gotecha for their invaluable inputs which have always helped to look into the work from a third perspective. Moreover, I am highly obliged to take the opportunity to sincerely thank the planning department of CEPT University for their generous attitude and wonderful facilitation. At last but not least am thankful to all my friends who have encouraged me throughout the year. And I am thankful to everyone for being there for each other amidst this global pandemic of COVID-19 supporting each other in whatever way possible. -Tamanna Parvin PG191039
Individual Contribution My contribution towards academic work has always been of a very holistic nature. I prefer to contribute my very best especially in a group work. In a group work it is not about achieving leadership stand, but about working & pushing each others limits to export the excellence present in every team member. I have taken in-charge of things wherever & whenever needed for the team, clearly leaving space for others to take the pedestal as well. My contribution to the team has been seamless which I strongly believe upon, i.e. the outcome of the group work should represent one unit and not four members individualistic contribution. On an individual level, I have tried to maintain clarity, quality & creativity of the work by not only just me, but also what the other members have contributed to.
Legend for level of Contribution Mix Effort in Group of 4
2
Leaded Effort in Group of 4
Partnered Effort with 1 member in Group of 4
Individual Effort in Group of 4
Individual Work
Contents
Journey towards learning Micro Planning
Exercise
1
• • • • •
Vision About Cost & Revenue Zoning & its layers Urban Analysis
Exercise
2
• • • • •
Site Context City Context Connectivity & Landmarks Market Feasibility Planning Feasibility
• •
Feasible Scenario Costing
Local Area
• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Regional Context Metro Context Upcoming Potentials Area of Interest Potential for TOD Development Boundary Delineation Final Base map for LAP Existing Situation Analysis Way Forward Metro Station Analysis via 3D’s Vision & Objectives Concept Derivation Concept Plan Case Study for Walkability (Block sizes)
• • • • • •
Conceptual Street Network Proposed Street Network Zoning Masterplan Regulation Rationale Zoning Regulations Metro Station Area Development: Sector 13 Metro Station Metro Station Area Development: Sector 12 Metro Station Metro Station Area Development: Sector 11 Metro Station Metro Station Area Development: Sector 10 Metro Station Cost Estimation for the LAP Final Envisioned LAP Site for Dwarka
Planning
• • • • •
L
earning Outcomes
3
Exercise1:AreaDevelopmentModel|BatteryParkCity|NewYork
Battery Park City, New York
Area Development Model : Special Purpose District
Vision
Well-balanced community & Community renewal
Adaptable & sustainable quality design
About
Just over forty years ago, the land upon which the Battery Park City neighbourhood was built didn’t even exist. This built-from-scratch planned community developed by Cooper Robertson in the 1970s and built upon landfill created with dirt and rock from Manhattan excavation sites like that of the original World Trade Center. The neighbourhood now boasts residential buildings, one of the largest public parks in New York City, and world class retail and commercial spaces.
Battery Park City Area : 0.39 km²
Cost & Revenue
Total cost of Infrastructure or development: • 1979 Spending cost: $115 M • 2018 Resiliency cost: $300 M Revenues: Generation p.a.: $100 M Sources of Revenues: •Leasing and subleasing of individual parcels •Bank Deposits, Investments, Rents and Other Receivables
4
•Bond Resolution Restricted Assets •Project Assets •Current and Non-current Assets •Liabilities
Financial Plan Operating Budget
Capital Budget
Revenue
Expenditure
Operating
Non-operating
Zoning & its layers 1
2
3
Zoning and Land Use Zoning Districts Commercial Districts Manufacturing Districts Residence Districts Parks Battery Park City Special Purpose Districts Special Purpose Subdistricts
Supporting Zoning Layers Sidewalk Cafes All Cafes Permitted Small Cafes Permitted Unenclosed and Small Cafes Permitted
1.BPC Special Purpose District Zoning Coastal Zone Boundary 2.BPC Special Purpose Sub-District Zoning 3.BPC Land-use Master-plan Basemaps
Urban Analysis
Seamless layers
Sunlight penetration & Vista Design
Conscious DCR’s
Subways Building Footprints
Built vs Open
Road Network
Blocks & Intersection 14m-18m 9m-14m 4m-9m 0-4m
Public Amenities Dead End (4) 2 Arms (55)
Public Land: Open Space & Recreation
3 Arms (52)
Private Mixed Use
4 Arms (43)
Private Use
5 Arms (3) Streets
Roads Public Amenities 5%
Blocks
37% 51% 12%
Community oriented public realms and inclusive design.
Almost 50% of the streets are non-vehicular.
Centreline/km²: 45.5 Intersections/ km²: 392 Avg Block size (km²): 0.004
27%
26%
4% 38%
Mixed use facilitates community enhancement
5
Exercise 2: Feasibility Study | Rourkela
Rourkela
Feasibility Study : Single Plot
Site Context
•Old Rourkela Market adjacent to the Railway station provides intensive commercial transactions. •Old commercial establishments, shops & hotels have become landmarks over time. •The Street front is so diverse that at every 100m there is a specific identity along the street edge.
City Context
Rourkela is a planned city located in the northern part of Odisha, India. The city is also the headquarters of Sundargarh district. It is the third-largest Urban Agglomeration in Odisha. It is situated about 328 kilometres north of state capital Bhubaneswar and is surrounded by a range of hills and encircled by rivers - Koel, Sankha, and Brahmani. The city is also popularly known as Ispat Nagar and also as the Steel City of Odisha. It has one of the largest steel plants of the Steel Authority of India Limited known as Rourkela Steel Plant. It also has one of the National Institutes of Technology(NIT) of the country. Rourkela is third largest city of Odisha state and is categorised as a Tier-2 city.
Connectivity & Landmarks
towards Sectors
Railway Station is 445m from site
The Crossroad Mall New Busstand
Towards Uditnagar which acts as a spillover of commercial activity from the old market
towards Bisra Bisra Munda Stadium
Old Market
Site (Uma Talkies) Petrol Pump Bisra Chowk
Ring Road Towards Panposh and Vedvyas
Hotel Radhika Bus Stand
6
City Node Autorickshaw Stand
0
200
400m
Planning Feasibility
Market Feasibility Surrounding Built Use
100% of the front plots along the streets are commercial (retail shops) in nature. 90% of the interior blocks are market complexes.
Land-use
Commercial
Plot Area
8927
Permissible FAR
2.50
Total Permissible Built-up Area
22,317.5
Permissible ground coverage
40%
Restaurants/Bars
Tentative Floor Plate area
3570.8
Hotels
Permissible Height as per FAR
6.25 ~ 6 floors
Banks
Setbacks on all sides as per Height
8m
Plot area available for development after removing area required for setbacks, common plots, ground coverage etc.
22,317.5 = 21,424.82 (6 floors) + 892.68 (0.25 floors)
Total Feasible/ Possible built built-up area for the site for different permissible uses (Considering all the regulations above ) Commercial and Mixed use
22,317.5
Shopping Centres
Market Value in surrounding area
Others
Occupancy
Retail Shop Hotel, Restaurants, Bar Apartments
100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0%
Area (m²) / Factors
Parameters
Developer 1 Developer 2 Developer 3 Developer 4 Developer 5 Developer 6 Developer 7
Feasible Scenarios
Costing
Market Feasibility + Planning Feasibility = Scenarios Scenario 1 Hotel + Restaurants, Bar • High concentration of hotels and restaurants in the area indicate the demand for choices /options for hotels and restaurants • This location is accessible from all around the market area. • Centre of the city Scenario 2 Shopping Centre + Multiplexes, entertainment • One stop solution • Overall experience of shopping & amusement Scenario 3 Business and professional offices + Bank • Proximity to Transport nodes • Business District • City centre
Development Scenario
Development Cost Revenue Estimate
Profit Estimate
92.8 crore Rs. 101.5 crore Rs. 116 crore
31 crore Rs. 40 crore Rs. 54 crore
Rs.
Scenario 1 Scenario 2
Rs.
61.7 crore
Scenario 3
Rs.
Recommendation
Scenario 2 seems best fit at this location
• • • • • •
Revenue from this kind of development will grow over the years. The existing landmark and importance of being a commercial land as a cinema theatre can be utilized for attracting more public footfall. No relevant Ground Coverage is given as per land use Height can depend on the access road No data for purchasable FAR. An area such a this can be beneficial to both parties with purchasable FAR. Floor to floor height can added.
7
TODTransformationforDwarka
Dwarka
TOD Transformation : Local Area Plan
Metro Context
Regional Context • • • • • • •
Dwarka in itself and regionally around is surrounded with suburban & urban village character.
South West Delhi Sub-city Diplomatic enclave Envisioned smart city Abundant Social Amenities Largest residential suburb in Asia Higher Growth trend amidst West Delhi Towards Najafgarh
Najafgarh Bypass
Upcoming Potentials Further expansion of Najafgarh Corridor NSUT Campus Habitat Centre Proposed International Sports Complex Diplomatic Enclave Cleaning Najafgarh Drain International Convention Centre Airport Line Extension “Dwarka, one of the three sub-cities devel-
oped three decades ago, is in for a revamp with the Delhi Development Authority working on a plan to resolve issues of traffic congestion, lack of commercial spaces and poor last mile connectivity.” - Anurag Jain, V.C., DDA
8
Delhi
Dwarka
Towards centre of Delhi
Towards Pankha rd
Towards Palam
Hangout Zone Dwarka City Centre Towards Najafgarh
Indira Gandhi International Airport
Towards NH8, Airport & Gurgaon
Blue Line Orange Line Grey Line 0
2 km
Potential for TOD Redevelopment
Area of Interest Considering the potentials & Metro Stations, this area is identified as viable for a holistic development.
Airport
Proximity to Gurgaon Mass Rapid Transit System Implementation of TOD policy in Delhi
Blue Line Orange Line Grey Line Metro Station
Boundary Delineation The area in the immediate vicinity of the metro station, for within a walking distance, having high density compact development with mixed land use to support all basic needs of the residents, is considered the Influence zone of metro station/ corridor.
Final Base map for LAP Site Area: 7.3 km² ≥50% area of a plot in the influence zone, plots were delineated accordingly.
4.6
m
1k 1.7
Amalgamating the influence zones into a corridor of 800m from the metro stations on each side.
m
80
0m
7k
9
TODTransformationforDwarka
Existing Situation Analysis Block Analysis Map
Actual Distance to be travelled
Land-use Map
1% 5%
19%
Metro Stop
Residential
25%
6% 1%
Source Commercial Vacant lands
Spatial Distance
10%
5% Open green (Majorly along Naala)
13%
12%
3%
Legend
LAP_Boundary
Perimeter
197m - 440m 440m - 766m
766m - 1235m
Missing Connections
1235m - 1950m
°
1950m - 3314m 0
0.25
0.5
1 Km
Average Block size: 957m (perimeter) Development Analysis Map
Higher land rate under commercial land use
Transaction along the metro corridor land is comparatively quite low. Average FSI utilized : 2.25
Circle Rate Residential ₹ Plot
₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ 15 times
Institutional ₹ Plot
₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹
Commercial ₹ Plot
₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹
63% Of the land
Legend
is owned by DDA
LAP_Boundary Level of Development No development Vacant >50% 50% or less
°
10
0
0.25
Market Rate
0.5
1 Km
39%
18%
30%
13%
>50% Developed
≤ 50% developed
Vacant
No development
Potential for redevelopment
Undeveloped Land
37%
13 times
8 times
Public
Built
Open 20% 17%
63%
Private Open
Way Forward Potentials Highly Feasible land under Metro Influence Area Concerns • Underutilised FAR • High vacancy • Low job density • Fixed uses of plots • High land prices • High ownership by DDA
Potentials Inter city road connectivity and high linkage Concerns • Larger block sizes • Missing links • Low pedestrian accessibility • Automobile oriented design of roads
Potentials Green & blue resourced Concerns • More emphasis on private open • Infrastructural challenges (nalla cleaning and sewage pipes) • Mismatched green network Potentials Active neighbourhoods Concerns • Disintegrated context to metro • Vacant lands surrounding the metro • Unsafe • Gated communities • Lack of active dedicated public realms
11
TODTransformationforDwarka
Metro Station Analysis via 3D’s a. Sector 13 Station
Density a
b
c
b. Sector 12 Station
d. Sector 10 Station
d
Built vs Open
33%
Public Open Built Private Open
50%
15% 21%
17%
36
DU / Hectare
62
1 hectare
10% 18%
65%
57
1 hectare
16% 2%
60%
60%
40
1 hectare
1 hectare
Open Space (m²) /capita
14.81
6.94
7.52
1.65
Job Density
364.13
204.22
110
797.13
a. Sector 13 Station
Diversity a
b
c
b. Sector 12 Station
c. Sector 11 Station
d. Sector 10 Station
d
Identified Dominant character(%) Residential Commercial Institutional Others
39%
25%
28% 23%
36%
0
0.26
Homogeneous
44%
49%
0 Entropy: Heterogeneity of Area Character
12
c. Sector 11 Station
1
Heterogeneous
26%
28%
28%
40%
1 0.1 6
0 0.13
34%
0 1
1 0.24
a. Sector 13 Station
Density a
b
c
b. Sector 12 Station
c. Sector 11 Station
d. Sector 10 Station
d
Mean Block Perimeter (m)
1050 m
Porosity
1040 m
Poor edges
1300 m
Most Active
935 m
Poor edges with higher block sizes
Poor edges inspite of having smaller blocks
Linkage to Metro Intersection Density (/ m²) Link to Node Ratio
4.17
4.17
1.59
3.38
1.19
1.14
0.87
0.94
Street Connectivity Footpath Yes
1.4 No
Inference a
b
c
a. Sector
Threshold
13
Station
1.4
b. Sector
1.4
12
Station
c. Sector
1.4
11
Station
d. Sector
10
Station
d
Dominant Character
Intensive job generation especially from commercial activities
Prominently Residential
Prominently Residential & Socio-cultural
Intensive job generation especially from Institutional entities
Metro Corridor Character
Inadequate Lighting
Poor Public realm
No eyes on the street
Non-porous edges
On street parking
13
TODTransformationforDwarka
Vision & Objectives • • • • • • • • • • •
• • •
• • •
14
TOD Principles Interconnected street network NMT Network Last mile connectivity Mixed land use Compact Development Value capture financing Affordable Housing Managed parking Making it a Regional Hub Supporting Job Generators Boosting the existing institutional hub Scope for Planned informal economy
Increase Walkability Interconnected green network Well designed pedestrian walkways Promoting Public Transport in intense Influence zone.
Vibrancy Mixed Use development along metro corridor Active Frontages Productive community spaces
Concept Derivation Layer 1: Commercial Belt facilitating TOD • Missing Links • Linear pattern • Extending the connections • Safe & walkable streets • Immediate link to the metro corridor
Layer 2: Station wise Urban Characters • Potential dominant character from 3D’s analysis is enhanced
Layer 3: Green Network • Linking the existing green land • Green linkage along the active edges to enhance the quality of life
Concept Plan High Intensity mixed use corridor Green corridor Mixed use 1 (MU1)
Low Intensity Moderate Intensity
Mixed use 2 (MU2)
Low Intensity Moderate Intensity
Mixed use 3 (MU3)
Low Intensity Moderate Intensity
Strengthening Street Network to Optimize block size Using Character Based Zoning to Promote Development
Improving Land Mechanism to Unlock Land Potential Using Form Based Regulations to create Active Edges
Metro Station area Development Initiating Placemaking to create Socio-cultural Centers
Integrating Green Blue Network
15
TODTransformationforDwarka
Case Study for Walkability (Block sizes) Little Rock, AR
Manhattan, NY
Portland, OR
Salt Lake City, UT San Francisco, CA
Street width
35m
29m
18m
18m
40m
20m
Block Size
105m
90m
182m x 76m
60m
200m
128m x 84m
Street Area
44%
42%
26%
41%
30%
30%
Street Frontage
25km
30km
32.5km
48km
17km
34km
Inference
800m x 800m
Austin, TX
Less Street width Convenient to cross From a tax perspective, the less area dedicated to streets, the better
Rectangular Block Size Smaller Block Perimeter Higher Attention Span Optimize shortest distance travelled
Length
Breadth
Commercial
120-180
80-100
Sector 13
Residential
200
100-150
Sector 12 & 11
Institutional
200-250
200-250
Sector 10
Conceptual Street Network Primary Street
Strengthen the central spine of the metro-to- metro connection to create TOD corridor. This will act as sub-arterial for PT users.
16
Secondary Streets
Tertiary Streets/ NMT Streets
These will facilitate direct connections to the metro stations(nodes) & parallel arterial roads to decrease the last mile connectivity by increasing walkability.
This creates the feeder network not only for improving the connectivity but also decrease the block sizes & facilitate green network along.
Proposed Street Network
Proposed Bi-cycle Network
Proposed Green Network
Secondary Street Primary Street
Primary Street • • • • • •
Re-designing the Metro corridor into Walkable street No private vehicular parking within 200m on either side of primary street Dedicated bus lane Green network along the road Active edge through placemaking Community activity space underneath the metro corridor in sector 11
NMT Street • •
Pedestrian cycling street Reducing block sides and redefining the connectivity
Existing Blocks
Proposed Blocks
Secondary Street • • • • •
Pedestrianised/cycling streets Green network along the road No on-street private vehicular parking Active edge through placemaking Bus /IPT Feeder network
Avg. decrease in Block sizes: 53%
17
TODTransformationforDwarka
Zoning Masterplan MU1
•
In zone, at least 50% of the total built up is developed as commercial, EDC charges shall be reduced up to Rs. 350/m².
•
zone, at least 40% of the total built up is developed as In residential, EDC charges shall be reduced up to Rs. 350/m².
•
In zone, at least 50% of the total built up is developed as institutional, EDC charges shall be reduced up to Rs. 350/m².
MU2 MU3
Regulation rationale PLANNING
Underutilized FSI
URBAN DESIGN
Non-Conducive Environment
No eyes on streets
MU1 Low Intensity MU1 Moderate Intensity MU2 Low Intensity MU2 Moderate Intensity High Intensity Mixed use MU3 Low Intensity MU3 Moderate Intensity Green Corridor
Underutilized land along the metro land
Higher land market rates deter development
Poor street Design
Zoning Regulations FSI
ZONE Base *Additional **Max. Permissible
HIGH INTENSITY
6 1.5 7.5
Dwelling- 3, Mercantile - 1,2, Educational- 1,2, Assembly- 1,2, Institutional, Religious, Hospitality, Permissible Uses Service Establishment, Transport, Public Institutional, Health- 1,2 and 3, Tourism Services
MODERATE INTENSITY
4 1.5 5.5
LOW INTENSITY
3 1.5 4.5
GREEN CORRIDOR
0.3 0 0.3
Dwelling-1,2 and 3, Mercantile 1,Educational 1 and Dwelling - 3, Mercantile 1 and 2, Educational 1 and 2, Assembly 1,2,3 and 4, Institutional, Religious, 2, Assembly 1,2 and 3, Institutional, Religious, Hospitality, Service Establishments, Storage, Religious, Temporary Use, Tourism Hospitality, Service Establishment, PublicTransport, Temporary Use, Public Utility, PublicServices, Recreational Use, Sports and Leisure Institutional, Public Utility, Heath- 1,2 and 3, Institutional, Health 1,2,3 and 4, Tourism Services, Tourism Services Recreational Use, Sports and Leisure
*Additional FSI can be purchased from DDA and or as TDR from plots within Dwarka **Affordable Housing will be incentivized by 1.5 additional FAR over and above the Max. Permissible FAR Floor Plate
18
Planning Regulations ZONE
HIGH INTENSITY
Side setback is to be applied after min. 8m frontage built
Setback (m)
• • •
Side setback not applicable to corner facing plot
Front
Side
Rear
Front
Side
Rear
Front
Side
Rear
0
3 100%
6
0
3 100%-Setback
6
NA
3 NA
3
Frontage Common Plot
LOW INTENSITY
MODERATE INTENSITY
Mandatory open space minimum 20% for public domain shall be followed according to the uses Only temporary construction shall be permitted in this space such as wholesale markets, vending stalls, community activities etc. The open space shall be increased according to the uses
FSI
Design Guidelines ZONE
(6+1.5) 7.5
(4+1.5) 5.5
(3+1.5) 4.5
HIGH INTENSITY
MODERATE INTENSITY
LOW INTENSITY
* The area can be shaded and only temporary structures will be allowed to be erected in this step-back
Built- to- line (m) *Step- back (m) Arcade Porosity
Mandatory (In case of plots with two ROWs both the Mandatory (In case of plots with two ROWs both the sides have to follow the built- to-line setback) sides have to follow the built- to-line setback)
NA
min. Step-back
min. Height below
min. Step-back
min. Height below
min. Step- back
min. Height below
6m
15 m
4m
7m
3m
7m
clear width
6m
Clear depth
NA
6m
Façade Treatment
Compound Wall
Façade Treatment
Compound Wall
Façade Treatment
Compound Wall
70% transparent
Not Allowed
50% transparent
Not Allowed
NA
Permitted height 1.2m
19
TODTransformationforDwarka
Metro Station Area Development: Sector 13 Metro Station Metro Station/ Rail
Footpath
Bike Lane
Station Bay
Plaza / Public Realm
Existing Building
Vehicular road
Green Pockets
Proposed Building
Plazas enhance the socio-cultural needs
Barrier free design for pedestrians
1 Bus lane + 2 private vehicle lanes; only dropoff allowed
Green Pockets maintains the ecological balance Café edges of the building improves public engagements in plazas
Skywalks giving access to commercial buildings & malls
Dedicated Vending zones in plazas enhances the public realm Bus & IPT Stop
20
Metro Station Area Development: Sector 12 Metro Station Proposed Recreation centre
Plazas enhance the socio-cultural needs
Barrier free design for pedestrians
Play Zones
Theatre (OAT)
1 Bus lane + 2 private vehicle lanes; only dropoff allowed
Ensured shading for Bicycle Network Café edges of the building improves public engagements in plazas
Skywalks giving access to commercial buildings & malls
Dedicated Vending zones in plazas enhances the public realm Bus & IPT Stop
21
TODTransformationforDwarka
Metro Station Area Development: Sector 11 Metro Station Metro Station/ Rail
Footpath
Bike Lane
Station Bay
Plaza / Public Realm
Existing Building
Vehicular road
Green Pockets
Proposed Building
Green Pockets maintains the ecological balance
Barrier free design for pedestrians
1 Bus lane + 2 private vehicle lanes; only dropoff allowed
Ensured shading for Bicycle Network
Skywalks giving access to community centre & Footpath
Redevelopment of Open setback areas into vending zones & market complexes for active edge
Bus & IPT Stop
22
Socio-cultural Amenities
Proposed Community Centre
Food Court & Exhibition
Metro Station Area Development: Sector 10 Metro Station Proposed City Centre
Green Pockets maintains the ecological balance
Barrier free design for pedestrians
Digital Library
Digital & interactive Museum
1 Bus lane + 2 private vehicle lanes; only dropoff allowed
Ensured shading for Bicycle Network
Skywalks themed around a walkway library towards city centre giving direct access
Redevelopment of Open setback areas into vending zones & market complexes for active edge
Bus & IPT Stop
23
TODTransformationforDwarka
Cost Estimation for the LAP
238
Crores
28 Crores
Road Network
49.2
Crores Projects
Infrastructure
For total Network addition of
91 Crores Affordable housing
405 Crores
50.47km
9 Crores
17 Crores
Water supply
Sewage
2 Crores
Storm water
Final Envisioned LAP Site for Dwarka COMPACT & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE & HETEROGENEITY TO INSTIGATE ACTIVENESS & MULTIDIMENSIONAL TRANSACTIONS
Unlocking Land Potentials
24
Enhanced Street Network
Nala Front Development
Station Area Development
Learning Outcomes
3 Semester, Urban Expansion and Regeneration Planning Studio rd
Description
Exercise
Exercise
1
2
Local Area Planning
Outcomes
Study of Development Models Case studies across India and international. Research
Analyse
Practicality
Decision making
Livability
Affordability
Evaluate
Identify Development Feasibility of a Vacant Plot in your city.
Microlevel planning requires detailed understanding of different layers including land, real estate, environment, transport, infrastructure, cost and recovery etc. Success of these plans depend on identifying right type of development model and mechanisms, and using them in right manner. Devise a Local Area Plan for Dwarka in Delhi to rejuvenate & redevelopment the area contextually.
User Experience
25
