Olympic Village Proposal - Milan 2026

Page 1

olympic village proposal 2026

G8: Ekin Olcay, Veronica Vaccari, Tamta Jugashvili, Yoana Penelova

contents

_01 infrastructure _02 landscape & natural systems _03 settlement environment _04 opportunities _05 olympic guidelines _06 olympic village typologies _07 exit strategy _08 guidelines _09 masterplan proposal _10 detailed areas

_01 infrastructure

_infrastructural system

Geneve, Switzerland

London (1:50hr)

Paris (1:20hr)

Zurich, Switzerland

Lyon, France

Madrid (2:20hr)

Legend

Nice, France

Milan Turin

Highways

Secondary roads

Tertiary roads

Flights

Catania (1:50hr)

Moscow (3:20hr)

Innsbruck, Austria

Rome (1hr)

Bari (1:30hr)

Lubiana, Slovenia

Genova Venice Bologna Ancona Florence

_regional connections

Legend regional roads railway net ring road

NOVARA

RHO

ABBIATEGRASSO

RONCHETTO

MONZA COMO BERGAMO LODI

TREVIGLIO

PAVIA

TRAM 2

TRAM 14 BUS 49

BUS 95

TRENORD S9 NEW METRO LINE 4

SEREGNO

SAN CRISTOFORO

RONCHETTO

ABBIATEGRASSO

_public transport connections
Legend
S. AMBROGIO M2 SFORZA POLICLINICO M3 SAN BABILA M1 DATEO FORLANINI FS LINATE

_Ronchetto connections to the main elements of the city by public transportation

_Ronchetto connections to the main elements of the city by car

RONCHETTO 10’ 20’ 30’ 40’ 50’ 60’ DUOMO CENTRALE SEMPIONE ABBIATEGRASSO CORSICO MILANOFIORI LAMBRATE SAN SIRO NAVIGLIO GRANDE
SAN CRISTOFORO CHURCH RONCHETTO 10’ 20’ 30’ 40’ 50’ 60’ DUOMO CENTRALE SEMPIONE SAN SIRO NAVIGLIO GRANDE ABBIATEGRASSO CORSICO PAVIA NOVARA MILANOFIORI LAMBRATE SAN CRISTOFORO CHURCH

_vehicular mobility system

bus stops tram stops

Legend existing vehicular mobility system existing closed road parking areas

_pedestrian mobility system

Legend

existing pedestrian roads closed pedestrian road

_bicycle paths

Legend bike routes

bike routes under construction

_02 landscape & natural systems

_water system

Legend

Lakes Rivers

Adda Ticino Milan

_green system

Legend

National and Regional parks

Pianura Padana

Parco Agricolo Milano Sud Milan

_green infrastructure navigli system Legend water

canale villoresi

connects to ticino river

naviglio martesana

parvo della cave

naviglio grande

parco della balossa agriculture parks urban parks

darsena roggia vettabia

parco della risaie

parco nord parco lambro fiume lambro meridionale connects to navilgio bereguardo connects to ticino river in pavia

olona lambro parco idroscalo parco agricolo sud parco del ticino

naviglio pavese

_navigli historic transformation

(connects to Adda river)

Legend

fossa interne 1155 - 1167

conca

redefossi 1783 - 1786

naviglio martesana 1447 - 1497

naviglio grande 1179 - 1219

naviglo pavese & darsena 1601 - 1819

(connects to Ticino river)

spanish walls

fossa romana

(connects to Ticino river)

_navigli connections

ticino river

lago maggiore lago di como

lago di lugano adda river naviglio grande milano pavia

cities

Legend canals rivers / canals

naviglio pavese naviglio bereguardo

naviglio martesana abbiategrasso po river

adriatic sea

fix

_navigli historic transformation

1947
1937 1910 1884 1732 1699 1580 mediolanum

_most advanced navilgli canals

3

_green infrastructure ronchetto

piazza tirana

navigligrande

sports venue agriculture

open green spaces urban gardens

Legend gated green spaces water important buildings future park

villa durini parrocchia di s. silvestro lo scalo rigeneriamo urbano cascina ferrera parrocchia di s maria ausiliatrice old cemetery metro deposit fiumelambromeridionale gonin social park s cristoforo station sport complex football world cascina castel roma cascina castel vismara mulino di sotto mulino di sopra

_03 settlement environment

_land use

green Legend public use school road

residential use residential+commercial use water

commercial use religious use

_building functions

Legend public buildings school buildings religious buildings

commercial buildings

residential buildings residential+commercial buildings

Age

Kids (0-5 yrs)

Teenagers (6-17 yrs)

Young (18- 34yrs)

Adults (35-65)

Old (65+)

Residential

Buildings Productive Commercial Tertiary Services Other

via Martinelli residential zone road sidewalk sidewalk sidewalk sidewalk road road 7.5m 2m road road sidewalk sidewalk residential zone 8.5m 3.5m 2m 8m 124m 350 m residential zone 197m 2m 7.5m 2m 2m 1 5 10 30 80 2m road carpark sidewalk sidewalk school green 15m 2m 13.5m 2m 140m Cascina road residential road green 40m 8m 390m 7m 77m
Via Martinelli Via Enna Via Tre Castelli Via Tre Castelli _PGT charts
_Street Sections
Italians Nationality Foreigners Egyptians Peruvians Philippines

_04 opportunities

_future projects in Milan

Rogoredo

Segrate

San Donato FS

re-opening navigli

Legend new urban parks 7 railways yard project metro system

Noverasco

Rho Fiera Cascina Gobba Linate Airport Sacco Certosa Molino Dorino San Cristoforo Farini Porta Romana Greco-Breda Lambrate Porta Genova Darsena Martesana Canal

_future interventions in Ronchetto

“Ospedale San Carlo”

M4 San Cristoforo

“Ospedale San Paolo”

Legend

“Ospedale dei Santi” development area

“Parco delle Risaie” project area

7 railway yard project for Milan

metro line M4

M4 deposit

“Parco Agricolo Milano Sud”

M4

•Strong identitiy of the place

•Canals

•Agriculture

•Cascinas

•Location

•Lots of green areas (Parco agricolo di sud and parco delle risaie)

•Good soil conditions

•Not densely populated

•Expo 2015 (held in Milan)

•Periphery

•Lack of connectivity between two part of the area divided by the canal

•Degraded area of the Naviglio

Invalid Settelements

•Problem of public transportation(not sufficient bus stops)

•Contrast between high-density area and urban gardens.

•Large transformation area: •New ATM Terminal

•Hospital

•New Metro Line

•New Green Park… etc (above the canal)

•Future agricultural center of Milan

•New student neighbourhood (our project area)

•Connection to green belt

•Center for satellite cities (arrows to regional connections)

•A way to relieve the pressure from the city center

•Losing

•Gentrification

•Not efficient evaluation of importance of the place (not enough demand)

_SWOT analysis
S W O
Tthe peaceful nature of the place after urban transformation

_emphasising the identity of the place with an increased focus on water canals

_integrating the project area to the surrounding city tissue by creating continuity (cross-connetion)

_creating the territorial project, protecting the natural and cultural landscape, developing it as a tourist destination for a sustainable enjoyment of the territory

_integrating Parco Agricolo Sud Milano into the city

_key issues

_05 olympic guidelines

_venues of Milan-Cortina Winter Olympics 2026

Previous Olympic Games:

Turin 2006 (winter) Rome 1960

Cortina 1956 (winter)

MILANO (1.4 mln)

Skating Ice Hockey OV IBC + MPC O + C

LIVIGNO

Freestyle Snowboard OV

BORMIO

Ski Alpine

CORTINA (6000)

Bobsleigh Curling Luge Ski Alpine OV

Legend

Host Cities Other Locations

Competition Venues

Existing Temporary New

4 Olympic Villages (Milan - 1300 beds)

Val di Fieme

Cross Country Ski Jumping Skating OV

Baselga di Pine

Speed Skating

Connection between the clusters

• MILAN – CORTINA 415km / 5h00

• MILAN – BORMIO 202km / 3h10

• MILAN – VAL DI FIEMME 290km / 4h00

• CORTINA – BORMIO 330km / 5h30

10 1 1

Fiera Milano

Palalido

Fiera Milano

IBC + MPC

Palalido Ice Hockey Capacity - 5600

San Siro

Opening & Closing ceremonies Capacity - 80 000 Palaitalia Ice Hockey Capacity - 15 000

RONCHETTO

Legend Mediolanum Forum

San Siro existing

Palaitalia planned

Mediolanum Forum Skating Capacity - 12 300

Ronchetto (Suggested) Olympic Village Capacity - 1300 beds

_planned venues in Milan of Milan-Cortina Winter Olimpics 2026

_Ronchetto connections to the olympic venues by

and

PALALIDO PALALIDO

50’

40’

30’

60’ SAN SIRO

20’

10’

SAN SIRO RONCHETTO

FORUM
MEDIOLANUM FORUM MEDIOLANUM
MEDIOLANUM FORUM MEDIOLANUM FORUM PALAITALIA PALAITALIA

_Ronchetto connections to satellite cities by public transportation

Legnano 59,492

1h30ʼ

Cinisello Balsamo 74,534

Paderno Dugano 47,750

1h15ʼ

60ʼ

Monza 122,759

45ʼ

Sesto San Giovanni 81,750

Abbiategrasso 32,650

Rozzano 41,581

Rho 51,033 Cologno Monzese 47,880

30ʼ

15ʼ

RONCHETTO

Pavia 72,636

San Giuliano Milnese 37,235

Segrate 35,016

Pioltello 36,756

Treviglio 29,924 Corsico 34,723

Lodi 45,212 Cremona 34,264

_06 olympic village history

With the objective of bringing together all competitors, team officials and other team personnel in one place, the OCOG shall provide an Olympic Village available at least two weeks before the opening ceremony and until three days after the closing ceremony of the Olympic Games. The Olympic Village shall meet the requirements of the “Olympic Village Guide” established by the IOC Executive Board.

_olympic villages: overview

Zappeion Hall (1906)

currently being used as a Conference and Exhibition Center for both public and private purposes.

Hiedelburg West Village (1956)

Now it is a primary school, shopping strip, a community health centre which also houses a registered training organization and a legal service.

Miguel Hidalgo Olympic Village Complex (1968)

Moscow, 1980

Designed by Workshop 15 of the Mosproekt-1 Department, the 1980 Olympic Village was built in record time using prefabrication technology common to many residential buildings in Moscow at the time.

Seoul, 1988

The village is virtually a self-contained city in the southeast section of Seoul, with a residential zone of 86 high-rise and midrise buildings and every amenity possible. Athletes have available to them different facilities even a video game room.

Nagano 1998

The village is located 7 kilometers southwest of Nagano Station.

The total land space is 19 hectares. There are 1032 apartments in 22 buildings, and is capable of accommodating 3,000 people

Turin, 2006

The restored historic building of the Mercati Generali, which was built in 1934. The village will cater to up to 2,500 people providing gyms, shops, restaurants and a medical centre. The village also has a focus on renewable energy

Sochi, 2014

The main Olympic Village of the 2014 games is within the Olympic Park. It was built by Basic Element. The village consists of 47 buildings and is designed for three thousand people. Coastal Cluster.

Paris, 1924

Temporary structures built just to accomodate the men during the time.

Rome Olympic Village (1960)

The apartments were to be used after the games as dwellings for 6500 people. The Olympic Village was a showcase project for Rome in the years following World War II.

904 apartments distributed in 29 multi-story buildings.The Miguel Hidalgo Olympic Village was built on the rural southern edge of Mexico City as a major development project that involved several government agencies. The cheery calm of this postcard image elides the memory of the violent suppression of student protests during the run-up to the 1968 Olympics

Los Angeles, 1932

Temporary structures accompanied by firehouse, hospital, and commerical spaces. First village!

The 1500-building Olympic Village in Rome was designed by Luigi Moretti, at the height of his influence on the city’s urban plan.

Lake Placid, 1980

At the time, arrests and incarceration were approaching record highs so they took over the village. The athletes actually stayed there after it was converted back to a village and later reopened.

Barcelona, 1992

The Barcelona organizers built an entire neighborhood around the Olympic Village, teaming with developers and city officials to redevelop a two-mile stretch along the coast with beaches, parks, open space and art.

Sydney, 2000

In contrast to the public housing built for the Melbourne games, the Olympic Village in Sydney was designed and sold as suburban townhomes and condominiums. Some athletes were housed in what later became garages.

Newington

Beijing, 2008

Apartments in the LEED gold-certified Beijing Olympic Village reportedly sold for over a million dollars.

Rio de Janeiro, 2016

With a capacity of 17,950 people and a total of 3,604 apartments and 31 buildings, it is the largest Olympic Village in the history of the Olympic Games. Village in very bad condition, due to political scandals which plunged the country's economy into chaos.

Doberlitz Village (1936)

14 km from Berlin. Accomodation huts. A lot of commerical spaced embedded within (massage, haircut). Due to the war they were used as barracks for 50 years.

Squaw Valley Village (1960)

Four identical three-story apartment buildings, two of which still stand, modified into condominiums. Add location.

Munich, 1972

On the second week of the games a terrorist attack occured, killing 11 Isreali athelete. This event made secutiry a top priority during the games. Men and women were seperated into two different villages. The village could hold up to 11,000 people. It was comprised of 3 to 25 story buildings.

Los Angeles, 1984

This fragmented “village” was spread among various buildings on the USC, UCLA, and UCSB campuses, so the architects included design elements such as colorful tubes, which were intended to create a visual sense of connectivity.

Lillehammer, 1994

Artificial village constructed in Lillehammer, Norway, to accommodate 2,300 athletes. The village, consisting of wooden buildings, including parts in glue-laminated wood.

Salt Lake City, 2002

The village is located 7 kilometers southwest of Nagano Station. The total land space is 19 hectares. There are 1032 apartments in 22 buildings, and is capable of accommodating 3,000 people

Vancouver 2010

The site, a former industrial area which mostly consisted of parking lots, is located on the shorelin. The site has 252 affordable housing units and another 100 units are for "modest market housing".

Peyongchang, 2018

In the mountainous Pyeongchang region comprising eight 15-story high-rise. functioning little towns of their own, boasting cafeterias featuring cuisine from all over the world, 24-hour gyms, banks, post offices, laundry facilities, media centers, convenience stores and houses of worship

London, 2012

Helsinki, 1952 organizers built an athlete’s village that could be converted into apartments after the games were over. Located near Puu-Käpylä, the first Garden City in Finland, the Olympic Village apartments are still inhabited today.

Tokyo, 1964

Athletes were housed in buildings near the National Gymnasium designed by Kenzo Tange, on former army grounds that were converted to a public park in 1967

Montreal, 1976

In the wake of the attacks at Munich, the 1976 organizers restricted access to the four 23-story pyramids of the Montreal Olympic Village. Originally budgeted at $30 million, the 19-storey complex ended up costing $98 million. Sold for $176.5 million.

Sarajevo, 1984

Abandoned and left to crumble into oblivion, most of the 1984 Winter Olympic venues in Bosnia's capital Sarajavo have been reduced to rubble by neglect as much as the 1990s conflict that tore apart the former Yugoslavia.

Atlanta, 1996

The Atlanta games were financed almost entirely with private funds. The Olympic Village buildings are now dormitories at the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Athens, 2004

Today the Athens Olympic Village is one of the largest social housing complexes in Greece.

For this year’s games, the Organizing Committee redeveloped a predominantly industrial area, the Lower Lea Valley, in east London. The new mixed-use district, Stratford, includes the Olympic Village complex, a shopping center and millions of square feet of commercial space. Temporary partitions installed during the games are being removed to create a range of one to five bed homes, ranging from apartments to townhouses.

_olympic villages: reuse value

1906 Athens 1924 Paris 1932 LosAngeles 1936 Berlin 1952 Helsinki 1956 Melbourne Rome 1960 SquawValley 1968 MexicoCity 1972 Munich 1976 Montreal LakePlacid 1980 MoscowSarajevo 1984 LosAngeles 1988 Seoul 1992 Barcelona 1994 Lillehammer 1996 Atlanta 1998 Nagano 2000 Sydney 2002 SaltLakeCity 2004 Athens 2006 Turin 2008 Beijing 2010 Vancouver 2012 London 2014 Sochi 2016 RiodeJaneiro 2018 Peyongchang

** success is based on how and what happened to the villages after they
done using them** **
where
were no villages built are not included** demolished
demolished demolished abandoned war barracks
1/2
demolished
destroyed
abandoned
abandoned luxury
vacant
successful transformation
were
years
there
1964 Tokyo events building
housing public housing 6500 dwellings shopping space
left for condos
uni campus apartments apartments student housing apartments prison (lake placid) social housing
by war (sarajevo) student housing (la) landmark neighborhood sold to different people suburban complex suburban complex
refugee camp social housing new district
condos 93% vacant

1906 Athens 1924 Paris 1932 LosAngeles 1936 Berlin 1952 Helsinki 1956 Melbourne Rome 1960 SquawValley 1968 MexicoCity 1972 Munich 1976 Montreal LakePlacid 1980 MoscowSarajevo 1984 LosAngeles 1988 Seoul 1992 Barcelona 1994 Lillehammer 1996 Atlanta 1998 Nagano 2000 Sydney 2002 SaltLakeCity 2004 Athens 2006 Turin 2008 Beijing 2010 Vancouver 2012 London 2014 Sochi 2016 RiodeJaneiro 2018 Peyongchang

1964 Tokyo

_olympic villages: proximity to city center
+15 km
city center

_olympic villages: typologies

helsinki 1952 berlin 1936

moscow 1980 montreal 1976 munich 1972 mexico city 1968 lake placid 1980 los angeles 1984 usc ucla

atlanta 1996 barcelona 1992 seoul 1988

sydney 2000 athens 2004 beijing 2008

salt lake city 2002 nagano 1998 sochi 2014 peyongchang 2018 london 2012 vancouver 2010

turin 2006

_olympic villages: typology conclusions

Oriented around a central program or place. High density areas taking up most of the site space. Not expandable.

_courtyard

Well defined perimeters of specific blocks. Contains green space within the center. Varied site coverage. Expandable.

Uses underlined grid for the purposes of organizing space. Alternate bands of green space and built up area.Varied site coverage. Expandable.

_object in landscape

Tower in the park with flexible green space. Doesn’t necessarily fit within the context of the surrounding buildings. Doesn’t take up a lot of space from the site. Expandable.

munich 1972
_radial
_linear
seoul 1988 london 2012 beijing 2008 sochi 2014 atlanta 1996 montreal 1976 mexico city 1968 barcelona 1992

_olympic villages compared to ronchetto

munich 1972

_radial _courtyard _linear _object in landscape barcelona 1992 montreal 1976 beijing 2008

_07 exit strategy

_the exit strategy

IOC Sustainability Strategy (The International Olympic Committee)

• Use of existing infrastructure is maximised and temporary and demountable venues are used where no longterm venue legacy need exists or can be justified

• If built, infrastructure is viable and has a minimal environmental footprint

• Sites have a net positive impact on local communities

• Sites respect protected natural areas, and urban green spaces are promoted

• Sites respect protected cultural areas

• Sites conserve water resources and protect water quality

• Mobility solutions are environmentally and socially responsible

• Freight operations are environmentally and socially responsible

• Sustainable tourism is promoted

Strategic Goals of the City Council of Milan Future of the Olimpic Village of Ronchetto

• Active participation and involvement of local communities

• The planned Olympic Village in Milan will be turned into student housing for several nearby universities (As Milan has a growing demand for university accommodation, the Olympic Village development aligns well with the objective of creating affordable housing for students.)

• The Games would build on the environmental practices that the cities recently developed – Milan for the 2015 World Expo

• Complete, continuous and sustainable post-Olympic use of venues is a top priority

• Tourism growth

• Creating affordable student housing and social housing

• Creating inclusive public spaces with mixed functions (mix of plazas, pedestrian areas, shared urban vegetable gardens, large market place, library, exhibition spaces and retail facilities)

• Introducing additional water canal system

• Creating a place for experimentation - new ways of working, inhabiting spaces, enjoying life

• Creating a hub well-connected to both Milan city center and to satellite cities of the metropolitan area.

_universities and student residences

Politecnico di Milano - Bovisa

Legend Universities

Student Residences

Università degli Studi di Milano - Bicocca

Politecnico di Milano - Leonardo

Università degli Studi di Milano - Città Studi

Università degli Studi di Milano - Statale Università Bocconi

IED - Istituto Europeo di Design

IULM - Libera Università di Lingue e Comunicazioni NABA - Nuova Accademia di Belle Arti Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Accademia di Belle Arti di Brera
_social housing projects existing/on-going projects Legend Via Rizzoli Via Civitavecchia Via Merezzate Via Feltrinelli Via
Voltri Via Ovada Via Cenni Via Fratelli Zola Via Gallarate Via Appennini Via Cogne Via Senigallia

_farmhouses in Milan

Cascina Merlata

Cascina Bellaria

Cascina Cotica

Cascina Melghera

Cascina Rosa

Cascina Caldera

Cascina Cavriano

Cascina Sant’Ambrogio

Cascina Linterno

Cascina Guascona

Legend

(Associazione Cascine Milano) farmhouses

Cascina Castel Roma

Cascina Moncucco

Cascina Casottello

Cascina Vaiano Valle

Cascina Gaggioli

Cascina Ronchettino

agriculture parks

Cascina Tre Ronchetti

Cascina Cuccagna

Cascina Santa Brera

Cascina Battivacco Cascina Campazzino

_revitalization of historical farmhouses in Milan

Lombardy has over 57,000 businesses engaged in agriculture and 8,000 in food and drink production, making it one of the Country’s foremost regions in the farming and food industry; 69% of the region’s land is given over to these activities. At the same time, the Region has a network of higher education and research centres which are among the world’s most advanced, including institutions which work very closely with farmers and food producers. (Expo Milano 2015 - Sustainability Report)

In order to recover urban and periurban farmhouses from both an architectural and a functional point of view The Cascine Milano Association was founded in 2013. The main objectives of the association includes:

_establishment and promotion of an integrated system of places dedicated to agriculture, food, culture and social housing in the metropolitan area of Milan, with a view to economic, social, energy and production sustainability, having as a center the public owned Cascine network

_development of an integrated system of places dedicated to agriculture, food, culture, social housing and the care of the territory of the farms of the Milan metropolitan area, with a view to economic, social, energy and production sustainability.

Some successfull examples of recovered farmhouses in Milan are:

Cascina Cuccagna

Progetto Cuccagna recovers the precious and large spaces of the eighteenth-century homonymous urban farmhouse, falling and abandoned before, to make it a place for meeting and aggregation, an active laboratory of culture, a reference point for the common research of social well-being and quality of life.

Cascina Santa Brera

In the heart of the Parco Agricolo Sud, an ancient farmhouse rich in history, restored with the principles and materials of green building, offers its guests 34 hectares of protected environment, cultivated with the methods of organic farming. Just 10 km from Milan you can find 40 beds in rooms and minialloggi in addition to a catering service based on organic raw materials . Ample internal parking. Friday afternoon, Saturday and Sunday direct sales of honey, organic eggs of pasture hens, meat, salami, preserves, fresh organic fruit and vegetables.

Cascina Merlata

The district consists of a mixité of functions: a set of services including a kindergarten, a primary and a lower secondary school, two nursery schools, equipped public spaces, playgrounds, the historic Cascina Merlata renovated for functions of public interest and the Village Expo 2015, now Social Village that has been converted into residences and services, with renovated homes ready for sale. To complete the project also a shopping center, and the large urban park which extends over an area of about 250,000 square meters, closely integrated with the residences and connected to the already existing green spaces, was totally redeveloped. The Park is also crossed by one of the "green rays" of Milan, that is connected with the system of spaces and cycle paths that radiate up to the center of the city.

Detail from the map of farmhouses around Milan, prepared for the pastoral visits of Carlo Borromeo starting in 1566, which took place in the parish churches of Segrate and Cesano

_08 guidelines

_open spaces and urban green areas

urban park Legend urban gardens public plazas

_urban park _urban garden _market plaza _green corridor

_roads and parking

for buildings 30,157 ÷ 10 = 3,015.7 3015.7 ÷ 12.5 = 241

under above

7m

space for busses to stop and pick up athletes and later citizens

_parking spaces

metro Legend bus lines

roads parking spaces

space for busses to stop and pick up athletes and later citizens

_public transportation

1 main road = 12 m

2 new secondary roads = 7,5 m

2 existing enlarged roads = +4 m

_roads

P P P P P P P P P P M M x10 x20 x7 x7 x7 x20 x120 x60 x75 x83 P P
351 47 47
255 156
10°

_new road infrastructure

closed gym

new secondary roads

enlarging existing roads new primary road

Legend new round about new primary road underground

closed gym closed gym
_Before/After 1 5 10 20 50 road+parking empty green building inner courtyard 12m 16+m 12m 14+m road empty green green space building 7m 81+m 14m 22m road library green space building 7m bike sidewalk 3m 10m sidewalk 21m 50m 14m 22m bike road green building inner courtyard 3m 2m 7m 16+m 12m 14+m water empty green 7m water hospital site metro road bike 7m 20m 8m 7m 3m green 14m building 8m gym road carpark building 25m bike 3m entrance “piazza” 45m 10m carpark 15 7m 4m 8m building 20m green 38m green road carpark building 20m building 40m 10m carpark 15 7m 8m building 20m green 38m

_bus

re-routing map

bus 47 Legend bus 47 re-route bust 325 bus 351 bus 351 re-route

M

M

bisceglie romolo

M buccinasco

_walkability networks and itineraries 351 351 47 M M M 47 325 325 351 325 351 325 351 325 351 325 351 325 351 47 325 6 mins 9 mins 5 mins M 5m 6m 5m 8m residential + commertial car road bike green green residential agri-park corridor planter residential + commertial pedestrian co-working co-working residential + commertial pedestrian pedestrian pedestrian pedestrian canal bike 4m 3m 3m 5m 12m 8m 7.5m 3m 9m 8m 10m 25m 4m 3m 3m 1m 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Metro Stops Legend Bike Paths Bus Stops

_public facilities and functions

Legend public facilities commercial facilities

mix use residential units

buildings are organized along the main axis

inner garden

more storeys on active streets

front facade vs rear facade

inner garden active street

_the exit strategy

IOC Sustainability Strategy (The International Olympic Committee)

• Use of existing infrastructure is maximised and temporary and demountable venues are used where no longterm venue legacy need exists or can be justified

• If built, infrastructure is viable and has a minimal environmental footprint

• Sites have a net positive impact on local communities

• Sites respect protected natural areas, and urban green spaces are promoted

• Sites respect protected cultural areas

• Sites conserve water resources and protect water quality

• Mobility solutions are environmentally and socially responsible

• Freight operations are environmentally and socially responsible

• Sustainable tourism is promoted

Strategic Goals of the City Council of Milan Future of the Olimpic Village of Ronchetto

• Active participation and involvement of local communities

• The planned Olympic Village in Milan will be turned into student housing for several nearby universities (As Milan has a growing demand for university accommodation, the Olympic Village development aligns well with the objective of creating affordable housing for students.)

• The Games would build on the environmental practices that the cities recently developed – Milan for the 2015 World Expo

• Complete, continuous and sustainable post-Olympic use of venues is a top priority

• Tourism growth

• Creating affordable student housing and social housing

• Creating inclusive public spaces with mixed functions (mix of plazas, pedestrian areas, shared urban vegetable gardens, large market place, library, exhibition spaces and retail facilities)

• Introducing additional water canal system

• Creating a place for experimentation - new ways of working, inhabiting spaces, enjoying life

• Creating a hub well-connected to both Milan city center and to satellite cities of the metropolitan area.

_functions change during and after the Olympics

gym & wellness center during Olympics info point restaurant rehabilitation center

recreation center cafes

residences library

gym & wellness center after Olympics info point marketplace co-working

cinema agro-workshops agro-park training park urban gardens agro-park urban park urban gardens

mixed housing library

axonometric diagram

built-up space percentage

built-up space pathways open, public and green spaces connections and parking lots

residential: 60% commercial: 16% public: 24%

pathways’ width

bike lane: 3 m main path: 12 m secondary paths: 8 m tertiary paths: 6 m

public space percentage

urban park: 28% agricultural park: 20% green corridor: 20% plazas: 10%

road hierarchy

main road: 12 m secondary roads: 7.5 m tertiary road: 6 m

_exploded
P P P P P P P P P P M M x10 x20 x7 x7 x7 x20 x120 x60 x75 x83 P P 351 47 47 47 325 325 6 mins 9 mins 5 mins

_09 masterplan proposal

existing road system added roads bicycle paths

metro main road secondary roads

pedestrian paths entrances blocks water green composition

_masterplan diagrams

_zoning

closed gym

_emphasising the identity of the place with an increased focus on water canals

_integrating the project area to the surrounding city tissue by creating continuity (cross-connetion)

_creating the territorial project, protecting the natural and cultural landscape, developing it as a tourist destination for a sustainable enjoyment of the territory

Legend agro park replaced urban gardens urban parks

mix residential + commercial

public piazza canal

_integrating Parco Agricolo Sud Milano into the city

mix-use res. agriculture park co-working market “The Connected City” “Garden City” “Canal Swimmer’s Club” “Amsterdam Bridge” “Openact” “Openact” “Shanghai Neighborhood” “San Bartolome” “Matadouro Park” “Connected City” “Park’n’Play” “Agro Food Park” “Patches” “Parking Katwijk aan Zee”
_atmospheres

_indextes and parameters

_single residential bock unit ST - 192 350 m ST1 - 78250 m ST2 - 114100 m

_breaking the block unit into 3 different type of blocks to make it more open and inviting

_increasing heights of buildings to the side of main points of attraction

_introducing green public space inside the unit _adding pathways & bike stops 2 2 2

SF - 29 580 m2 CE - 162 700 m SS - 20 650 m 2 2

SC - 8930 m 2 2 SLP - 30 160m

UT=SLP/ST1 = 0.38 UF=SLP/SF = 1.02 RC=SC/SF = 0.3=30%

_block unit development
diagram

_10 detailed areas

Urban plaza

The urban plaza is the entrance from the city to our project area due to its location on the north. It is characterized by a central outdoor playground and a nice riverwalk on the level of the canal. On one side, there is a health and fitness center offering the service for both the inhabitants of the existing city and the new dwellers of the Ronchetto area.

Underground Road

Since the concept of this Olympic Village is to create a sustainable future district we decided to make the project area pedestrian. Thus, we put the planned highway underground connecting it to underground parking spaces that are enough for the residents and site visitors. On top of the underground highway we created a pedestrian public space that leads to agricultural workshop place, urban park with a library and urban gardens.

Main Street

The main street follows the water canal with benches and trees all along the water canal. Two sides of the street are connected with pedestrian and cycling bridges. All buildings located on the main street have 4 floors, first floor for commercial and the rest for residential uses. The street is loaded with various social functions and activities offering shops, markets, cafes, bars and green public spaces. First floor façade is pushed inside the building to create more public space and offer a comfortable passage for pedestrians in rainy weather.

Agro-park

The agro-park is area that remained mostly related with the characteristic of the site. It is characterized by vegetable gardens in order to bring the agriculture back into the city and an agricultural workshop building where to learn and teach the art of cultivation and exhibit its importance to the visitors.

Marketplace

The marketplace is a public space where local farmers and people from satellite cities can sell their agricultural products. It is a place of gathering and a place to discover new ways of living and sharing. There are two buildings dedicated to agricultural market and there is also an open-air market. Besides the agricultural market there is an entertainment center and a large public plaza with green spaces, water canal and benches connecting to metro station.

M

Metro

Since the accessibility and connectivity are the main features for a successful public space and since we reduced the usage of cars to a possible minimum inside the Olympic Village, we connected a site to both conceived metro stations to north and south. The bridge connects the village not only to metro station but to a hospital that will be built in the nearest future.

H M

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.