WATER URBANISM
RIVER & ROAD AS WARP & WOOF Interweaving Ecologies and Economies in the deltaic Territory, Banjarmasin, Indonesia 2015 K.U.Leuven, Master of Human Settlements, Master of Urbanism and Strategic Planning
VOLUME 1_EXPLORATIONS VOLUME 2_DESIGN INVESTIGATIONS
Prof. Dr. Bruno De Meulder, Prof. Guido Geenen, Tom van Mieghem, Cynthia Susilo, Stefanie Dens
WATER URBANISM STUDIO 2015 STUDIO TEAM Guido Geenen, prof ir-arch KULeuven Tom Van Mieghem, arch Stefanie Dens, ir-arch SUPPORTING STUDIO TEAM Bruno De Meulder, prof dr ir-arch KULeuven, program director MaHS/MaUSP Cynthia Susilo, phd KULeuven Sari Aryani IN COOPERATION WITH UN-Habitat, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific The City of Banjarmasin, Indonesia YKKS/P5 UNDIP, Indonesia Arcadis MORE INFO ? MAHS / MAUSP / EMU Master Programs Department ASRO, K.U.Leuven Kasteelpark Arenberg 1, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium Tel: + 32(0)16 321 391 Email: paulien.martens@kuleuven.be ISBN 978-94-6018-975-3 Wettelijk depot D/2015/7515/31 © Copyright by K.U.Leuven Without written permission of the promotors and the authors it is forbidden to reproduce or adapt in any form or by any means any part of this publication. Requests for obtaining the right to reproduce or utilize parts of this publication should be addressed to K.U.Leuven, Faculty of Engineering – Kasteelpark Arenberg 1, B-3001 Heverlee (België). Telefoon +32-16-32 13 50 & Fax. +32-16-32 19 88. A written permission of the promotor is also required to use the methods, products, schematics and programs described in this work for industrial or commercial use, and for submitting this publication in scientific contests. All images in this booklet are, unless credits are given, made or drawn by the authors (Water Urbanism Studio Banjarmasin, 2015).
WATER URBANISM
RIVER & ROAD AS WARP & WOOF Interweaving Ecologies and Economies in the deltaic Territory, Banjarmasin, Indonesia 2015 K.U.Leuven, Master of Human Settlements, Master of Urbanism and Strategic Planning
VOLUME 1_EXPLORATIONS VOLUME 2_DESIGN INVESTIGATIONS
Prof. Dr. Bruno De Meulder, Prof. Guido Geenen, Tom van Mieghem, Cynthia Susilo, Stefanie Dens
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
diary of a studio
This introductional text gives an overview of the masterclass in Banjarmasin and the studio that continued in Leuven. It highlights on steps in the process, decisions that have been taken throughout the studio sessions, and gives a quick overview of the elaborated strategies and projects that grew out of the debates.
2
design investigations
Five strategies and key projects for Banjarbakula: Directed Wetlands Receptive Landscapes Adjusting the Regional Network Coloring the Polarized City Framing the Adhesive Green Armature
3
writings
As part of a diploma thesis, these writings research and critique on issues related to the developped designs, in similar or opposing contexts. These writings form a theoratical background, and an extended vision on the proposed strategies and designs.
5
DIARY OF A STUDIO
1_FEBRUARY FIELDWORK
Last February 15-26, 20 KULeuven Mahs-Mausp international students and 4 KULeuven staff members went on a fieldtrip to Indonesia, South Kalimantan, Banjarbakula, Banjarmasin. The invitation was by UN-Habitat, implementing the initiative “Making Urban Investment Planning Work� in partnership with the Directorate General of Human Settlements (DGHS) of the Ministry of Public Works. In Banjarmasin 17 Indonesian participants joined our students (City of Banjarmasin Government, South Kalimantan Province Government, University of Lambung Mangkurat, IAP South Kalimantan, University of Diponegoro, Ministry of Public Works and Housing, and Indonesian KUL Alumni). Partners for the event were UN-Habitat, YKKS/P5 UNDIP, Pemda Banjarmasin, Arcadis and KULeuven. The first results of this fieldwork-masterclass were presented during the CDS closing event in Java, Semarang 27-28 February. Allow us to once more sincerely thank everybody who made this fieldwork-masterclass possible, and also to apologize again for adjusting the carefully prepared fieldtrip schedule and agenda last minute, for the sake of building a more thorough understanding of the region. The warm welcome, sound support, inspiring enthusiasm, fruitful collaboration and wonderful company have been amazing. We would especially like to thank UN-Habitat Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific and Bappeda Banjarmasin. And underline the very essential full preparation work and guidance of Nini Purwajati, Cynthia Susilo and Stefanie Dens. Back in Leuven on Sunday 1st March sound and safe, no time to recuperate (except for unfortunate Tarek) from the hard labour. The day after, on Monday 2nd March, we summoned our students in the Water Urbanism Design Studio Banjarmasin, as we would do for the next consecutive 9 Mondays in a row (Easter holidays excluded). The Water Urbanism Design Studio would have the fieldwork as a start for Design Explorations by the 20 KULeuven Mahs-Mausp students. It is the summary of these Design Explorations we present in this booklet.
8
2_MARCH CONCEPTS
Fieldwork groups (tissue, water, production and infrastructure) were reshuffled in 5 design groups of 4 students each, at the very beginning of the design studio: an iterative process since we desired one member of every field group in the design groups, and mixing nationalities. The first weeks were to be divided in finalising the fieldwork in the booklet Explorations [1], and simultaneously setting up design issues derived from this fieldwork. Animated discussions started up as design group members brought along fieldwork issues they wanted to further investigate. And at the same time a large amount of more and less official plans and documents were analysed to build an understanding of all the challenges the Banjarmasin region would be facing in the near future. This information very often seemed uncertain, unclear or even conflictuous.
220000.000000
114°30'0"E
114°45'0"E 250000.000000
115°0'0"E
!
REVIEW MATERI TEKNIS RAPERDA BANJARBAKULA ! ! !
!
PETA RENCANA STRUKTUR RUANG BANJAR BAKULA
µ
!
h
! (
!
!
!
! (
!
Anjirpasar 9650000.000000
" /
! (
! (
! (
# 0
120°0'0"E
2°0'0"N 2°0'0"S 6°0'0"S
10°0'0"S
!
!
!
!
! (
!
! (
Jaringan Transmisi Mikro
!
Rencana Rel Kereta Api
! (
3°30'0"S
!
!
! !
Danau
Rencana Sistem Pusat Kegiatan :
Jaringan Sutet Rencana Jalan TOL
Karang Intan
V
Cempaka
! ( ! ( ! ( ! (
Perkotaan Inti ( PKN/Kota Inti ) Perkotaan Inti ( PKW/Kota Inti ) Perkotaan Inti ( PKWp/Kota Inti ) Perkotaan disekitarnya (PKL/Kota Satelit) Perkotaan di Sekitarnya (Kota Kecil)
Infrastruktur :
h h h h h
Bati-bati
!
!
!
Sungai / Anak Sungai Laut
Rencana Jaringan : !
Rencana Jembatan Barito 2
!
!
V d
!
!
! ( ! (
!
Tambang Ulang
Jalan Setapak
Batas Kecamatan
!
Jalan Lokal Jalan Lain
Batas Propinsi
! (
!
Y#0
Kota Kecamatan
Terminal Argo Terminal Barang Terminal Type A Terminal Type B
Y Y
o
Jembatan Timbang Pengujian Kendaraan Rencana Bandara Rencana Dermaga ASDP
Terminal Type C
b
Rencana Stasiun Kereta Api
BTS
# V
Sport Center
Gardu Induk
Tempat Pemakaman Umum
IPAL TPA Regional TPA Lokal
! !
! ( 3°45'0"S
3°45'0"S
!
!
9590000.000000
!
!
! (
9590000.000000
Kurau
140°0'0"E
Bandara Pelabuhan Batas Kabupaten
!
( h! !
LAUT JAWA
136°0'0"E
Jalan Kolektor
Banjar Baru Selatan
Landasan Ulin
! (
o
132°0'0"E
Jalan Arteri
Kota Kabupaten
o
Mataraman
!
! (
128°0'0"E
Kota Provinsi
# 0 ! (
! (
Banjar Baru Utara
! (
! (
Liang Anggang
! (
Bumi Makmur
124°0'0"E
6°0'0"N
116°0'0"E
140°0'0"E
" /
!
! (
!
! ( ! (
Beruntung Baru
114°30'0"E
112°0'0"E
! (
( h!
! ( Martapura
9620000.000000
Y
b
!
9620000.000000
b
220000.000000
108°0'0"E
136°0'0"E
Legend
! (
Martapura Timur
! ( ( h ! ( o! ! ( !(
! (hh
Gambut
3°30'0"S
! (
!
! (b ! (
! (
! (
! ! ! !
! (
Aluh-aluh
!
Astambul
Martapura Barat
Kertak Hanyar
Tabunganen
104°0'0"E
132°0'0"E
6°0'0"N
! (
!
! (
Tatah Makmur
100°0'0"E
128°0'0"E
!
!
96°0'0"E
124°0'0"E
!
!
Banjarmasin Selatan
! (
120°0'0"E
2°0'0"N
! ! !
!
Sungai Tabuk
Banjarmasin Barat (TengahBanjarmasin Timur Banjarmasin!
! (
116°0'0"E
!
!
! (
b
112°0'0"E
! ! !
Banjarmasin Utara ! (
!
! (
V
Tamban! (
108°0'0"E
! !
3°15'0"S
! ! !
3°15'0"S
!
!
! (
! (
! (
!
V
!
Mekarsari
V
! (
d
( h ! ! ( Vh V h
Kilometer 20
15
DIAGRAM LOKASI
Mandastana
Alalak
10
: ...................... Tranverse Mercator : ...................... Grid Geografi dan Grid Universal Transverse Mercator : ...................... WGS84 - Zone 50S
104°0'0"E
6°0'0"S
b
V V
5
100°0'0"E
!
! !
!
! (
2.5
Proyeksi Sistem Grid Datum Horizontal
96°0'0"E
10°0'0"S
!
! (
0
2°0'0"S
!
!
9650000.000000
!
SKALA 1:110,000
V
Anjirmuara
! (
Therefore the studio would switch constantly between design group discussions and discussions with the full studio group, in an attempt to define specific design issues that are complementary to each other, and could support each other in a joint effort for envisioning a future for the region. At times the studio was thus considered as a semi-professional research group questioning the challenges for the region and how to deal with them. Trying to mitigate between the understanding of the territory from a meticulous fieldwork and the governments policies and projections. Trying to mitigate also between a genuine appreciation of local traditions and habits, and the projected pressure of a globalizing economy.
280000.000000
GAMBAR
KABUPATEN KUALA KAPUAS (PROVINSI KALTENG)
!
Soon it became obvious that it would be necessary to work not only in individual design groups, but also to work as one big group investigating a potential flexible spatial (landscape-) structure, derived from an understanding of the territory and preparing for a very uncertain future to come. From the very beginning of the design studio indeed, we received additional aspirations and expectations, and uncertain additional information, and this would go on during the full course of the studio. Some of the most upsetting information being a (serious) study for moving the Indonesian capital to Kalimantan (Palangkaraya or Pangkalan Bun) during the next 20 yrs, the announcement of Russian and Japanese studies for train infrastructures in Kalimantan, or upgraded national food efficiency programmes. Thanks Cynthia Susilo and Aryani Sari Rahmanti for keeping us updated and for your translations!
250000.000000 114°45'0"E
115°0'0"E
SUMBER : 1. Peta Rupa Bumi Indonesia, BIG Tahun 1999 2. Bappeda Kabupaten/Kota Tahun 2008 3. Bappeda Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan Tahun 2008 4. Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan
BADAN PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH PROVINSI KALIMANTAN SELATAN
280000.000000
[1] Water Urbanism, River & Road as Warp & Woof, Interweaving Ecologies and Economies in the deltaic Territory, Banjarmasin, Indonesia, VOLUME 1_EXPLORATIONS, 2015 KULeuven, Master of Human Settlements, Master of Urbanism and Strategic Planning. This booklet holds the studio topic, issues, and methodology, and the findings of the fielwork groups tissue, water, production and infrastructure. It holds the full list of participants and partners on the fieldwork-masterclass.
9
In a very short notice, 5 design concepts were tested in a mid review jury. Students prepared a design group analysis or statement, and formulated a draft design strategy. The statement maps are included in this booklet, while design strategies were further elaborated and refined during the second half of the design studio, and have replaced the first drafts.
1_Lost and Found_SCAPES / Time Earth Water_SCAPES 2_Reveiling Troubled Landscapes / Healing (the) Landscapes 3_Interplaying Flows / Shaping Mobilities mid review at KULeuven
4_Towards a Generic City? / Edge as Catalyst for Identity 5_Exploring the Diver(c)ity / Articulating R-Urbanity
We were very honoured with the interest of prof. Hari Wibisono who finally was not able to join the jury, and to receive prof. Sudaryono Sastrosasmito, Aryani Sari Rahmanti, Annelies Denijs, Yuri Gerrits, Matteo Motti, Julie Marin and of course prof. Bruno De Meulder as (guest) critics. The jury took note of the presented fieldwork and commented the first concepts. We remember prof. Sudaryono’s involved comments on typologies (scales, history, community patterns) and the questioning of the uncontrolled development that comes along with the new infrastructure within the very sensitive settlement patterns. A vivid discussion took place related to the supposedly dramatically shifting conditions that would occur during the coming years. What is the time frame considered? If change must come, what kind of change, for whom? Same people in other spatial conditions or other people that may need other spaces and will do other activities? What kind of space or infrastructure will be needed? And what can this landscape bear? Isn’t the direct relation with the landscape alarmingly disappearing? This studio must take position!
10
3_APRIL DESIGN EXPLORATIONS
Mid review critics and Easter holidays immediately after were obviously very inspiring!
Basic
A prelim on the v hydro a
Full group discussions multiplied, with or without the studio staff. A solid awareness of other design group’s aspirations grew, and design strategies started to leave room for each other and at the same time complement each other. The (attentive) reader will find elements of other design groups within the different projects. We consider this a true quality and an achievement of the studio as a whole.
Studio
Guido G Tom Van Stephanie & Studen 2015
Conte
1. Kalima Flood & U
Therefore we did an extra effort to summarize the different strategies and combine the students’ work in a single comprehensive map. It manifests a constructive ambition of us all to contribute to the debate, grateful for the invitation and the local support, and eager to make these efforts worthwhile.
2. Banjarb Landscap
3. Design
topography - the liquid territory of Banjarmasin
One vision explicitly triggered the interaction and reciprocity of design strategies: the ‘water’ design group came up with a very clear and sensitive strategy. It was as much innovative as it was pre-existing and thus conservative. A threefold strategy for runoff water (natural flow, activated drainage system, and enhanced storage capacity) combined with dealing with flood and saline intrusion pressures from SLR. It is based on a precision topography, and a solid understanding of existing water systems. At the time it felt like a breakthrough: a vision with excessive consequences! Therefore the water group did an extra effort to present this vision in an intermediate draft report, that we would try to double-check with water management experts. This did not really work out within the compelling time-schedule of the studio. The studio then decided to accept this vision as a structuring frame.
Flood & Underground Water Situation Source: BMKG Maps
0
Legend High > > Risk of Flooding
> Low
40
100 Km
0
High > > Ground Water stress
40
100 Km
> Low
The occurance of floods and relation to ground water highlights an interesting situation around the site of explorations within the region. for instances of floding some of the internal areas suffer flooding during peak rainy season, scuh as areas between banjarbaru and martapura. Similarly regions near the mouth of the river face the worst underground water conditions.
11
4_MAY CONCLUSIONS 1 DIRECTED WETLANDS enhanced identities through a cyclic waterscape Indeed the water vision highlighted the very delicate areas that should stay free of any new urbanization and must give room to water. 1
2 RECEPTIVE LANDSCAPES successional transformation and recovery/open-ended absorption scenarios
2
Afforestation strategies (mangrove forests and foothill forests) strongly support this vision, while simultaneously inviting new economies (harbour related or manufacturing and food processing) as partners to help and apply these afforestation strategies. A Barito mangrove-harbour or harbour-mangrove? A foothill forest-city or city-forest? Time will tell. A thorough understanding of production processes and soil conditions supports these strategies. 3 ADJUSTING THE REGIONAL NETWORK IN BANJARBAKULA activating the latent urban system
3
4
5
12
The ‘infrastructure’ group exactly needed these clarifications to adjust the infrastructural network to the expected and projected change. A clear hierarchy of the mobility network is implemented, reusing as much as possible of the existing or planned infrastructure and restricting the necessary new investments. It distinguishes the need (and probability) of public transport on a Kalimantan, regional and local scale. It recognizes the need of a long-term vision that can be gradually implemented. It understands the important role of raised infrastructural lines within the very low lying territory, as a strong tool to implement the envisioned water strategy. But basically this vision tries to build resilience against the purely speculative habit of developing every new road along its borders. (Development thickens to the extent that the road gets saturated and must be replaced by the following, spreading sprawl all over the territory without a proper mobility flow.) The result is a clever positioning of infrastructural lines in line with the water vision and with the ‘receptive landscapes’. Finally, this consolidated territorial landscape- and network-frame initiated an explicit vision on the relation of Banjarmasin and Banjarbaru(/ Martapura). The development pressure along this 30 km strip can be considered as the catalyst for the sprawl condition. Banjarmasin and Banjarbaru together tend to form a linear city. But this is happening in a flood prone territory with bad soil conditions: Gambut low lying area, swamp, space for water storage! The thickening of this development along
5_JUNE FINAL REVIEW
Jeneral Ahmed Yani (Transkalimantan road?) is furthermore congesting the major infrastructural spine, whereas extra room should be made for intercity (public) transport passing the Syamsudin Noor Airport. Banjarmasin and Banjarbaru must be understood as clearly separate cities, with very different characteristics and very different future potential. At the same time they are closely related and dependant one another, in a delicate balance. They share the airport and drink water facilities, as they may share the future train station, water park, natural water purification systems and power supplies? Twin cities?
This studio was a fine journey! Thank you students for your enthusiasm and pro-activity! The combined plans and captions seem to make a coherent story! Overall gevernment policies are confronted with territorial realities. It would be great if some of the proposed strategies - either based on incomplete (traffic) counts during fieldwork, or developed more intuitively due to lack of correct numbers (waterflows) - could be evaluated with more precision? We are pleased to present this work to policymakers and stakeholders, hoping it helps to envision a possibly sustainable future for a region we have come to appreciate in very many ways!
4 BANJARMASIN_COLOURING THE POLARIZED CITY Banjarmasin - traditional river city - located at Barito River is the harbour city as ‘gateway to Kalimantan’. It sits delicately on the slightly raised riverbanks, surrounded by floodable (swamp) territory. It urgently needs to clarify protective strategies against flood risk and saline intrusion. But some of the expected new development may be crucial to the region’s economy and should probably be absorbed here? The harbour is shifting towards the Java Sea, whereas universities and public amenities shift towards the Transkalimantan road and Barito Bridge in the north. The traditional city quarters and Kampongs experience pressure from infrastructure and development. The typical harbour city at one side of the mighty river is everything but radio concentric, so it should not need a ring road. But the main city road is blocked by through-going traffic. And how can Banjarmasin cherish its water-based origin? The Banjarmasin group investigates potential new identities for the polarized city that are in line with its landscape (and waterscape) and with its territory. 5 BANJARBARU_FRAMING THE ADHESIVE GREEN ARMATURE Banjarbaru on the other hand sits (with Martapura) safely on the dry edge of the swamp at the foothills of the mountain range, as a slope city, and has good soil conditions. It has a history of distinct natural settlements and consecutive planned urbanism. Lately the provincial headquarters were founded here. But (the periphery of) Banjarbaru is sprawl-like and still holds a lot of potential for densification. Banjarbaru holds many identities. Today it lacks cohesion and consistency and a clear urban structure. Water run-offs from the higher grounds pierce through the tissue. The Banjarbaru group investigates the characteristic open (green) spaces around these water bodies as a potential adhesive structure, and as a necessary complement of the road network. A potential for Banjarbaru to receive new programmes and more housing, and to simultaneously gain urban qualities?
Leuven, July 2015 studio staff: Guido Geenen, Tom Van Mieghem and Stefanie Dens with the very much appreciated support of: Bruno De Meulder, Cynthia Susilo and Aryani Sari Rahmanti 13
Banjarmasin, the city of 1000 rivers, seen from the Martapura River
DESIGN INVESTIGATIONS
DIRECTED WETLANDS Enhanced identities through a cyclic landscape Spandan Das Quynh Nhu Le, Ashim Manna, Valentine Van den Eynde
Indeed the water vision highlighted the very delicate areas that should stay free of any new urbanization and must give room to water.
0
1
5 km
plan scale
mid review map: reading of the liquid territory of Banjarbakula
oct
Flooded areas
18
jan
may
Drought
aug
+0,5
+1
1250
2500 mm/year
Sea level rise and precipitation
+2m
Soil conditions
peat alfisols istosols
entisols ultisols inceptisols
STRATEGY - The idea is to manage water and landscape in such a way that it allows to provide space to extend for the city but also for the economic activities and most certainly for water itself. To reach those goals, the strategy is to connect people, green and water to form one common language. The idea is to boost a compact development north-south of the cities in order to reinforce their own and distinct identities and to preserve a natural protected area between the two urbanized zones. This way we can direct water through this corridor instead of to the cities and re-organise productive landscape and waterscape. Taking time into account, the strategy is to reinforce drainage and storage of excessive water during the wet season while increasing flows and irrigations during the dry season to ensure production, life and security.
Flood
Drought
Forest
Peat Soil
Productive wetland
Urbanisation
Understanding the territory: conditions on Sout Kalimantan scale
+0,5 +1 mining
Infiltration levels
+2m
crop agricult grass
1950 1985 2010
Deforestation
prod. wetland forest wood production urbanisation
Land use
19
0
1
5 km
plan scale
Strategic project for Banjarbakulas water management
The approach is to create a blue corridor between the cities to give a path to the excessive water from the foothills down to the sea and to reduce pressure on Martapura river and Banjarmasin. The city becomes an island using infrastructure like dikes and doors letting the water cross or blocking it following the needs. Coming from the foothills water has different itineraries to join the sea without flooding Banjarmasin: an almost completely man-made and controlled system in the north with the polders and canals network, a mostly controlled system through Martapura river and Banjarmasin city, an almost not controlled and natural system in the south through the creek landscape. 20
Taking time into account, the strategy is to reinforce drainage and storage of excessive water during the wet season while increasing flows and irrigations during the dry season to ensure production, life and security. Looking at the territory, its landscape and its landuse, we can develop alternative ways of interpreting it. It is crucial to consider the existing situations and recognise its potentials. Water is more than streams. It becomes a resource, part of the public realm, supporting activities according to each landscape types and to seasonal landscapes. But the quantity and quality of water can easily become a massive issue if not handled properly. Looking
at the landscape with the intermediate scale allows to answer both large issues and specifi c needs and conditions. This way the landscape is shaped based on a multiscale approach both from a stakeholder’s point of view and from a landscape and development one.
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
The development plan of Banjarbakula is mainly in line with the presented strategies. Whereas industries and unified urbanized area are not part of the strategies, several actions are similar (forest, peat, mangroves, fisheries, ...)
The crucial points are developed in order to manage the main water issues while protecting the cities and redirecting the flows.
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
Lines are reinforced while offering more specified opportunities to middle scale stakeholders in order to intensify the potential of the region.
Small scale appropriations of the new landscape and waterscape are implemented, collecting the benefits and multiplying stakeholders in a more individual scale.
21
1 2 3
4
Strategies at a Regional scale: Banjarbakula water management, plan and section
22
FOREST
CHECK DAM SYSTEM
FOREST
VILLAGES RIVER
URBAN AREA
supporting economic local productions.
Section 1 “The Productive and Protective Forest”
FISH PONDS
CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS & WATER CLEANING SYSTEM
ORCHARDS & PADDIES
ORCHARDS & PADDIES
URBAN AREA
Section 2 “The Agricultural Terrace”
PEAT FOREST
CONSTRUCTED WETLAND
In the foothills, the protective and productive forest is reinforced to keep water longer. Using small scale check-dams the water is slowed down, favouring infiltration, recharging the aquifer and protecting topography from erosion while
WATER RESERVOIR
The wetland is associated with cleansing systems, storage areas and intensive productive landscapes that defines the transition between the city and the wetland. The waters of Banjarbaru are collected to be cleaned in a park mixed with orchards before joining the wetland.
After the wetland, the water passes through a cleansing waterpark forest before joining a storage area. Forest and storage are located in productive peat forest in order to take advantage of the high retention capacity of peat soil while protecting the region of ground fires in dry season.
AGRO PARK
Section 3 “The Cleaning Water Park Forest”
CREEK SYSTEM
SPONGE FOREST
AGRICULTURE (PADDY)
Section 4 “The Creeks System”
FISH POND
AGRICULTURE (PADDY)
FISH POND
FISH POND
AGRICULTURE (PADDY)
PEAT FOREST
The creek system acts as a sponge. Coming from the sea, a productive mangrove forest aims to become a buffer zone, consolidating the river bank and reducing saline intrusion. Natural landscape and man-made irrigation meet in a system of ponds and islands by profiling the topography to increase the productivity and protect ecosystems.
23
24
RECEPTIVE LANDSCAPES Succesional Transformation and Recovery Marion Mukolwe, Sadia Subrina, Michael Stas, Joyce Stijnen
Afforestation strategies (mangrove forests and foothill forests) strongly support this vision, while simultaneously inviting new economies (harbour related or manufacturing and food processing) as partners to help and apply these afforestation strategies. A Barito mangrove-harbour or harbour-mangrove? A foothill forest-city or city-forest? Time will tell. A thorough understanding of production processes and soil conditions supports these strategies. 25
0 plan scale
mid review map: a reading of threatened landscapes
READING - The map diagnoses the conflicts in the landscapes under threat especially if the current trend of land use was to continue. Troubled landscapes are an expression of the evolution of time in ever increasing development and the search for better livelihoods. The threat increases with the passage of time spent in the same trends. Excavations and mines will expand, ecosystems will continue to shrink 26
and plantations will fight forests for space. The contradiction is landscapes that have been heavily invested in but have not met their full potential. The level of irreversible damage is fast approaching requiring a strategic that takes into account the communities living in the region, the resources and the time factor.
1
5 km
0
1
5 km
plan scale
STRATEGY - Diverse landscapes are under threat by the current use of land and the demand for absorbing the new. The level of irreversible damage is fast approaching; requiring a strategy that frames a balanced, systematic transformation and recovery. By
taking advantage of the existing conditions of each landscape a feasible groundwork for the future is shaped. This project focuses on the mangrove and mining landscapes because of their strategic location within diverse conflicting edges in the area and their capacity to receive
the new along with enhancing the ecology. We consider three scales of transformation within a timeframe of fifteen years that shows a scenario, an open ended story for an uncertain future.
27
Two territories; mangroves and mines, in transformation are holding the capacity to absorb and receive the new. A strategic plan gives way to different possible scenario’s: Ecologically driven, development driven and a balanced scenario of the two previous. The strategies for transformation are to rebuild mangroves on the river edge and to do reforestation in the foot hills. These strategies are projected in different phases with small steps of interventions. The mines are exceptional landscapes that gives space for production, flood protection, facilities and services for future growth, ... while the mangroves provide room for new economies and reestablished ecologies.
28
A place for ‘the new’ ?
Landscapes that can absorb
existing:
Banjarmasin + Banjarbaru
new urban entity:
Mine landscape
Current estimate populaton new urban and port
Mangrove landscape
Current estimate populaton
= 140, 02 sq km = 933.933 persons = 126,00 sq km = 840.420 persons = 30 000 persons
density Banjarmasin: 6670 pers / sq km
= 21,14 sq km = 141.003 persons = 8000 persons
Edge Dynamics as starting point
Mangrove and productive landscape Banjabaru City, the mines the swamp and the plantations The tropical forest and plantations
29
MANGROVES
Mangroves MINES
RECEPTIVE LANDSCAPES - matrix showing 3 scales of transformations within a timeframe of 15 years
30
CONTEXT AND SUCCESIONAL GROWTH
2015
2020
2025
2030
31
MINES ( part 2)
RECEPTIVE LANDSCAPES - matrix showing 3 scales of transformations within a timeframe of 15 years
32
CONTEXT AND SUCCESIONAL GROWTH
2015
2020
2025
2030
33
Interplay of Mangrove and Port
Legend
Ecological driven scenario Ecology as a frame to absorb the new
Protection System
Avicennia pioneer, saline tolerant
Bruguiera inner mangrove, saline tolerant
Port Framework: Safeguarding space
Development driven scenario Transport and social infrastructure
Mangrove + coconut structure
Ceriops inner mangrove, saline tolerant
Euphorbiaceae
brackish areas, sunny position
Optimum Growth
Dredged waste into new land
Nypa Fructicans shore protection, sunny
Cocos Nucifera inner mangrove, protection
From scars to Identities
Port as clearances in the mangrove forest, structured by waterways and vegetation
34
Aquaculture intertwined with mangroves forming a productive dyke
Port and mangrove as interweaving river bank protection Mangrove as protective and productive dykes
0
1
5 km
Mines as structuring voids for the new
settlements
settlements
Legend
industry university campus dense park edge flood protection
settlements
industry
settlements
university campus dense park
industry
flood protection swamp
detension swamp reservoir
food production
edge
bigindigenous galam amenities forest restoration
dense park edge
food galam production
edge foothill commercial - riverbed hub
swamp
indigenous forest restoration
social centers
galam
commercial hub
repairian corridor
industry university campus dense park flood edge protection detension reservoir swamp food big production amenities indigenous galam forest
edge foothill restoration - riverbed commercial social hub centers
Ecological driven scenario Ecology as a frame to absorb the new
university campus
detension reservoir
flood detension protection reservoir
big amenities
food big production amenities
edge foothill - riverbed
Adapting new social topography
indigenous forest edge foothill restoration - riverbed
centers
commercial social hub centers
repairian corridor
Development driven scenario Transport and social infrastructure
High density + student housing typologies as border/threshhold
Water as swamp protection
Optimum Growth
Planting patterns as future definition
0
1
riparian
5 km
repairian corridor
repairian corridor
Anisoptera (Mersawa) along riverbanks
Eusideroxylon zwageri (Ulin) well drained soil along river
Sapindaceae (Rambutan) well drained soil, rich organic matter
Ficus
pioneer, grows on rocky soils
Hevea brasiliensis (Rubber) well drained, weathered soil
Melaleuca cajuputi (Gelam) peaty loam, coastal swamp forest
From scars to Identities
Mine as space for large amenities
Excavation mines as public space and mixed-use hubs
University campus and football stadium as objects in a water purifying park
New settlements, industries and commerce
Topography as a border and oppurtunity: University campus and football stadium as objects in a water purifying park Mines as commercial hubs: from tree nurseries and plantations to productive forest market
35
ADJUSTING THE REGIONAL NETWORK Activating the latent Urban System Baidya Emerald Upoma, Bosmans Claire, Matton Isabelle, Tran Trung Vinh
The ‘infrastructure’ group exactly needed these clarifications to adjust the infrastructural network to the expected and projected change. A clear hierarchy of the mobility network is implemented, reusing as much as possible of the existing or planned infrastructure and restricting the necessary new investments. It distinguishes the need (and probability) of public transport on a Kalimantan, regional and local scale. It recognizes the need of a long-term vision that can be gradually implemented. It understands the important role of raised infrastructural lines within the very low lying territory, as a strong tool to implement the envisioned water strategy. But basically this vision tries to build resilience against the purely speculative habit of developing every new road along its borders. (Development thickens to the extent that the road gets saturated and must be replaced by the following, spreading sprawl all over the territory without a proper mobility flow.) The result is a clever positioning of infrastructural lines in line with the water vision and with the ‘receptive landscapes’. Banjarmasin and Banjarbaru must be understood as clearly separate cities, with very different characteristics and very different future potential. At the same time they are closely related and dependant one another, in a delicate balance. They share the airport and drink water facilities, as they may share the future train station, water park, natural water purification systems and power supplies? Twin cities?
+7m
canal 12m
road 6m
AA - Martapura Lama
+7m canal 5m
BB
road 6m
BB - North Transkalimantan Road
AA
+27m road 12m
CC - Ahmed Yani Road - Banjarbaru
EE
+8m
DD
road 12m
FF
DD - Regional Road
CC
GG +7m canal 3m
right of way 30m
canal 3m
EE - Ahmed Yani Road - Banjarmasin
+10m right of way 18m
FF - Landscape line - Banjarbaru
+5m
0 plan scale
1
right of way 28m
5 km
Planned new satellite cities
GG - Industrial Corridor 0 sections scale
mid review map: a reading of the current infrastructure lines and their section
READING of INTERPLAYING FLOWS The analysis highlights an urban structure linking two cities, made by only one axis: the A. Yani road, single symbol of modernity. A systematic sprawl characterizes the recent urban developments replacing productive landscapes all around the city. Up to now, ring roads and new satellite cities are the weak planned alternatives to the street-city system.
Peoples flow - road based
How can infrastructures and mobility guide the urban growth, while preserving the landscape features of the environment? Products flow - road based
38
4
20 m
ONGOING - The way infrastructure is currently produced in the Banjar Bakula region and in Kalimantan has oversimplified the role of ecology and underplays the social aspect of urban infrastructure by an extreme reliance on efficiency. Being at a turning point in the region development, it is the occasion and the necessity to think about territories in another way, more in terms of quality and character.
734 vehicles/hour 6128 vehicles/hour
* counting realized during the fieldwork, during peak hours
BANJAR BAKULA - Ongoing infrastructure developement
Borneo - Transkalimantan road and railway project
39
TOOLBOX
Legend strategy map
0 plan scale
a strategy on the regional scale
Toolbox to upgrade the local network
40
1
5 km
1. REGIONAL SCALE AA’
Legend regional map
BB’ DD’
Legend urban map
a REGIONAL network for Banjar Bakula
AA’ Transkalimantan North
REGIONAL BUS + TRAIN - Adjustment + New network 5 to 10 km radius - 5 stops
Through strategic interventions (cut, add, profile) we adjust a n ongoing situation, clearing out a double system, along with its tasks, qualities and rhythms, always keeping in mind the waterscape as backgroung for any decision. The new network are thought to prepare for new developments, either urban or regional, opening up alternatives to a current overcrowded street-city system.
BB’ Transkalimantan Road + Urban Line / waterscape
DD’ - Transkalimantan / New line
41
2. URBAN SCALE
EE’
CC’
BB’
FF’
0
an URBAN network for the twin cities of Banjarmasin and Banjarbaru
1
5 km
plan scale
ee’ - Ring road / Banjarmasin
LOCAL BUS - Improvement of existing network Integrated - 300 m radius - no formal stop
cc’ - A. Yani / Banjarmasin
FAST BUS (BRT) - New network Separated line - 1 km radius - 30 stops
42
FF’
Intermodal node - phase 1 - design for the meeting between systems
Banjarmasin / Along the historic canals - public space & local public transportation
Intermodal node - phase 2 - ready for the train to come
Banjarmasin / Banjarbaru/ A. Yani - public space, drainage & fast bus line - preparing for density
Banjarmasin / Along the main rivers - public transportation Hybrid terminal, preparing for new major urban functions
43
COLORING THE POLARIZED CITY Kathleen De Beukelaer, Saima Musharrat, Hanne Van Gils, Amaranta Vargas Mendoza
Banjarmasin - traditional river city - located at Barito River is the harbour city as ‘gateway to Kalimantan’. It sits delicately on the slightly raised riverbanks, surrounded by floodable (swamp) territory. It urgently needs to clarify protective strategies against flood risk and saline intrusion. But some of the expected new development may be crucial to the region’s economy and should probably be absorbed here? The harbour is shifting towards the Java Sea, whereas universities and public amenities shift towards the Transkalimantan road and Barito Bridge in the north. The traditional city quarters and Kampongs experience pressure from infrastructure and development. The typical harbour city at one side of the mighty river is everything but radio concentric, so it should not need a ring road. But the main city road is blocked by through-going traffic. And how can Banjarmasin cherish its water-based origin? The Banjarmasin group investigates potential new identities for the polarized city that are in line with its landscape (and waterscape) and with its territory.
Reading of Banjarmasin
Banjarmasin is a key city that will grow rapidly. In order for the predicted doubling of population to take place, the growth model of the city needs to be closer looked at. Following the current trend, the edge of the city forms the first layer of possible urbanisation. As this 46
already causes some difficulties for the waterbased landscape, the question arised how this growth can take place differently. On top, it can be even stated how the new development can improve the old. Shifting from a concentric model towards a polycentric constellation, the
city will regain present identities including both present conditions as well as additional inputs. By shaping a clear urban figure and proffer a toolbox of actions, a transformation of the city will occur.
CURRENT FUCTIONS
CENTRAL MOSQUE
RIVERFRONT KAMPUNG
SOLID OBJECTS
URBAN TISSUE
NEW DEVELOPMENT
FROM CONCENTRIC TO POLYCENTRIC GROWTH Banjarmasin is a key city in the Banjarbakula region, framed all around by water. It is founded on the highest spot in which multiple rivers collide, resulting in a traditionally highly-water based growth. Nowadays, the city expanded between the rivers and is moving more and more within its edge. De-attached new developments and generic implementations as ring roads, reinforce this landscape-ignoring evolution. At first glance, the edge of the city forms an important area of tension as it will be the first new layer to be urbanised
commercial market education
industry terminal
health offices public services
tissue edge of 5m topogrphy line proposed ring roads focus zones CDS profile
Existing conditions
Looking towards the edge
Two pending questions arise: How will the city grow further? How can the new improve the old?
region
We distinguish multiple potentials and lingering identities at hand. Reinforcing this results in a shift from a concentric growth model towards a polycentric city. city
city
city
city
How the new can inforce the old
Colors of identity
47
REINFORCING THE INTERMEDIATE SCALE Each district will base itself on its specificity in order to induce change, created by a strong urban figure that symbolises the system of transformation. On the highest scale, it starts to question the collaboration of city, the 48
developers and the (future) inhabitants. In order to invest in the poly centre, all of them will have to place themselves in a set of rules. Zooming in, the specificity of each district, will come into place. Today, various spatial conditions are present and have the possibility
to recalibrate the new urban system resulting in a new spatial figure with more pronounced hierarchy of these conditions. All together, this results in various spatial scenario’s on site, which also include the social dimension of each poly centre.
As the waterbody in between Banjarmasin and Banjarbaru will clearly divide the two cities, Banjarmasin will have to opportunity to be more explicit framed. The multiple centres allow to pursue the lingering identities present in the current condition. By directing the growth of the city towards these nodes, it allows the city to preserve its productive and water-regulating landscape in between or even be strenghtened waterscapes as wetlands. The specificity of each polycentre will be brought to the surface, resulting in various strategies. Covering the different designs, each searches for connections within the spatial as well as the programatic and social relations. A new urban system colours this transformation towards a polorized city.
REDIRECTING OF FUNCTIONS
SPECIFICITY
commercial market education
health offices public services
industry terminal
?
REGIONAL
$
city
developer
inhabitants GAME RULES general
CITY new typology
urban functions
potential growth
connectivity
public space
ecologic infrastructure
specific
new spatial figure
present spatial conditions
DISTRICT
SITES
spatial scenario
social
A CORE AND ITS DISTRICT - Each poly centre aims to create a higher quality of urbanity. It consist out of one or two cores within a certain district or influential zone where within these facets have their own implementation.
TOOLBOX OF ACTIONS - Depending on the scale and its corresponding actor, a toolbox of actions guides the new development. According to different categories, multiple strategies are stated.
49
50 markets
$ wetland systyem
CBD offices
big shops along road
public transport
public transport water-based
productive landscape
forest
CONNECTING CENTRE markets
research centre
small scale industry
green corridor
public transport
urban shops along platforms road water-based
$
riverfrond
orchards
upgrated growth
terminal
mangroves
large scale industries
Each polycentre has a clear hierarchy $ $ of lines that create a new frame for each district. To enhance the identity, various spatial elements or programs are implemented.
new development
productive landscape
connectivity
recreational functions
water-based
A SYSTEM OF URBAN FIGURES -
+ 25 000 p. GREENED INDUSTRY
$ $ $
$
+ 150 000 p. + 25 000 p.
LIVING WITH THE GREEN REINFORCING THE TRADITIONAL
$ $
SEQUENCING URBANITY + 250 000 p.
LIVING WITH THE GREEN
REINFORCING THE TRADITIONAL
SEQUENCING URBANITY
The Trans-Kalimantan road forms the catalyst for the Northern part of the city. It holds the potential for having new typologies and being charged with urban elements. Bordered by an orchard system, the starting point is the green. The design strategy is to bring balance between the upcoming settlements and existing green. Taking the design toolbox as checkbox, the new developments are to add the improved living qualities that the city is missing. By connecting the voids with a green corridor and transforming them into platforms for large-scale functions, i.e research centre, university, commerce, park etc; the strategy tries to break the current mono-functionality of the area and giving it an identity which is more than only living.
Being the oldest road since the birth of Banjarmasin, the Martapura Lama holds great historical significance, including the commercial character. The challenge is thus to create conditions that would strengthen the traditional attributes of river settlements as well as creating new points of opportunities. In regional scale, this area lies in an important crossroad that can purify and retain the upstream water in a natural way before entering the city. Specific design strategies like connecting the water lines, upscaling small-scale industries and creating eco-tourism and recreational facilities provide for the future. All these, naturally, can be connected by introducing public water transport and reprofiling the existing road. By sharing common platforms of facilities, the new can meet the old while building an image of traditional, cultural and artisanal identity.
As one of the main links between Banjarmasin and Banjarbaru, A.Yani road has gone through great transformation in recent years, which is mostly turning the buildings’ front facade towards the road into linear and dense commercial corridor. This has often been done by razing the first layers of dwelling and blocking the water. As a challenge, this road asks for creating beneficial choices for living and working by taking advantage of the existing landfill and references from landscape. Our design strategy gives orientation to the spaces by equipping the road with public transport, generating secondary connections by strategically replacing bridges and making space for public facilities. Using the existing cross roads and water lines, micro worlds are created, while the landscape keeps flowing through. Layers of zoning redefine the spatial hierarchy providing options for a healthy urban mix.
51
5. FRAMING THE ADHESIVE GREEN ARMATURE Xxxx
FRAMING THE ADHESIVE GREEN ARMATURE Eleni Kasselouri, Danny Andres Osorio Gaviria, Sheeba Amir, Tarek Morad
Banjarbaru on the other hand sits (with Martapura) safely on the dry edge of the swamp at the foothills of the mountain range, as a slope city, and has good soil conditions. It has a history of distinct natural settlements and consecutive planned urbanism. Lately the provincial headquarters were founded here. But (the periphery of) Banjarbaru is sprawl-like and still holds a lot of potential for densification. Banjarbaru holds many identities. Today it lacks cohesion and consistency and a clear urban structure. Water run-offs from the higher grounds pierce through the tissue. The Banjarbaru group investigates the characteristic open (green) spaces around these water bodies as a potential adhesive structure, and as a necessary complement of the road network. A potential for Banjarbaru to receive new programmes and more housing, and to simultaneously gain urban qualities?
a STRATEGY for banjarbaru, lying on the outskirts of the mountains
1900
1970
URBAN GROWTH ALONG WATER AND INFRASTRUCTURE
A gradient of R-urbanity in the existing and emerging centers that drive urbanization
54
2010
FRAMING THE ARMATURE
ADHESIVE
GREEN
The existing green flows inside the city of Banjarbaru are currently part of a fragmented and dispersed urbanity, or being suppressed from the expanding urban tissue. The hidden potential of these flows is crucial for the new city, as they can constitute the new public spaces for the dense structure. Reversing polarity from negative to positive, they create ecological corridors that work together with the drainage system, while at the same time, connecting to the waterscape. In the framework of a compact but porous city, the green flows have a crucial role.
5 Minutes Walking Circle
Mosques
Ridges and Valleys_ sub-watersheds and saddles
Various Amenities
Infrastructure
0
.5
1
2 km
Amenities concentration along Ahmad Yani_ the civic spine of Banjarbaru
The relation of high land and low land
55
LEGEND urban green
natural
green,
high
productive green
Interwaving with the existing civic spine, the green armature constitutes a growing structure for the emerging city. Higher density and multiple new functions come along with the natural ecosystem. The green lines are formed by different green qualities; urban green, productive green, natural green and wetland green come together producing a variety of public spaces. The green lines are incorporating multiple scales and structure the territory for the ongoing urbanization process.
56
social forestry
low vegetation
continuity of green system
Agro-city_ Densify as a strategy to protect the productive landscape
Green boulevards upgrading the airport-city
Open public space_ the center of the emerging city
m
57
PARTNERS & STUDENTS
PARTNERS
K.U.LEUVEN STUDENTS
UN-HABITAT Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific
KULeuven Participants Sheeba Amir Claire Bosmans Spandan Das Kathleen De Beukelaer Eleni Kasselouri Quynh Nhu Le Ashim Manna Isabelle Matton Amaranta Vargas Mendoza Tarek Morad Marion Mukolwe Saima Musharrat Danny Osorio Michaël Stas Joyce Stijnen Sadia Subrina Trung Vinh Tran Emerald Upoma Baidya Hanne Van Gils Valentine Van den Eynde
Bruno Dercon Nini Purwajati Agung Ramadhan YKKS/P5 UNDIP
Holi Bina Wijaya Achmad Rifai Indra Hadi PEMDA BANJARMASIN
Fajar Desira Windiasti Kartika & team K.U. LEUVEN
Bruno de Meulder Guido Geenen Tom Van Mieghem Cynthia Susilo Stefanie Dens Sari Aryani ARCADIS
Bert Smolders David Osorio Robert Titus Alex Brook Fransisco Bernadeth Nuri
60
61
Banjarmasin, Indonesia
RIVER & ROAD AS WARP & WOOF Interweaving Ecologies and Economies in the deltaic Territory, Banjarmasin, Indonesia volume 2 : design investigations. Banjarmasin had a population of 625 000 in 2010 and is moving fastly towards the one million inhabitants. The city is laced with floodprone waterways, influenced by the ebb tide of the Java Sea. At a certain moment it counted more then hundred canals, creeks and riverways. Following this contemporary pace of development, the existing city and its lowlying flood prone periphery are being overlaid with a new scale of urban fabric and programs. New infrastructures and allotments adequately canalize development but, in general, and in so the Studio aims to explore ( and simultaneously test) in strategic projects development visions for Banjarmasin that could guide its sustainable development in spatial and socioeconomic and cultural terms.
MaHS, MaUSP Spring Design Studio 2015 Leuven, Belgium