FAKE GUNS Police raid on the College Avenue
campus brings up questions SEE OPINIONS, PAGE 6
DRUGSTORE MAKEUP Affordable, high-quality skincare and beauty products
SEE INSIDE BEAT, PAGE 8
WOMEN’S LACROSSE Rutgers win streak
extends to two with 15-7 win over Drexel SEE SPORTS, BACK
WEATHER Partly cloudy High: 46 Low: 34
Serving the Rutgers community since 1869. Independent since 1980.
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY—NEW BRUNSWICK
TUESDAY MARCH 6, 2018
ONLINE AT DAILYTARGUM.COM
Protesters support clean Dream Act, march across Rutgers CHRISTIAN ZAPATA NEWS EDITOR
Yesterday was not the day undocumented students and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients might have expected. The date that many associated with the termination of the DACA program and its approximately 690,000 recipients, instead brought forth members from a multitude of activist organizations on campus and all across New Jersey at Rutgers. “No DREAM Deferred: NJ Statewide Day of Action” took to Rutgers—Newark, Rutgers—Camden and to a number of New Jersey congressional representative offices before meeting at New Brunswick to demand a Dream Act that does not criminalize communities and separate families, according to its Facebook page. The protest started at 5 p.m., and representatives from a few of the organizations sponsoring the event gave their remarks before the group took to the streets. After which, they walked down College Avenue, leading the charge with banners that read “NODEFEREDDREAMERS” and “#HERETOSTAY.” The march ran down underneath the New Brunswick Amtrak and did not stop until it reached the front of the Douglass Student Center. Sergio Abreu, president of UndocuRutgers and a School of Engineering senior, said the event began around 11 a.m. at Rutgers—Newark and ended at Rutgers—New Brunswick for the largest demonstration of the day. Ever since Congress overturned President Donald J. Trump’s
DACA expiration date on March 5, a deadline for Congress to agree on a solution for the program, speculation has ensued over the future of DACA DREAMers. Abreu said the extended deadline helps the group’s current recipients whose protections will not be expiring — so long as they can continue to apply for renewal. It also pushes back the date that they need to act by, but is in no way less incentivizing to their ongoing efforts. “That doesn’t mean that this issue is any less relevant or less urgent cause any day now that court decision can be overturned,” he said. While the organization is conscious of other noteworthy issues, it is focused on keeping its issues relevant and present in the media. Even though the March 5 deadline would not have terminated protections issued to every DACA recipient, it marked the start of a process that has slowly left those enrolled in the program without protection since Sept. 5, 2017 — the date Trump effectively terminated new enrollment, according to Vox. “To hear my fellow DACA recipients say ‘I’m scared they’re going to deport me, I’m done, I want to give up’ is kind of like motivating,” said Cynthia Osorio, a community organizer for Wind of the Spirit. “That reminding them in a way, with the help of the other organizations, that once we work together, once we’re always out there in the media we have to be alive at all times because the moment we stop talking about it is the same moment that they’re going to not care about us.” As an immigration resource center located in Morristown,
Activist organizations on campus and all across New Jersey met on the steps of Brower Commons yesterday in support of a Dream Act that supports DACA recipients and paves a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants. GARRET STEFFE / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER New Jersey, Wind of the Spirit worked alongside many of the organizations present to help spread awareness that even though the March 5 deadline is no longer present there is still an ongoing effort to fight for a clean Dream Act and a pathway to citizenship, Osorio said. “Right now there’s a lot of legislation focusing around DACA, and it’s not clean, meaning that there’s money being used towards a wall, militarizing ICE gear, mass deportations and we don’t want to separate families so our message
today is dream deferred because our dream is being deferred once again,” she said. University spokesperson Dory Devlin said that University President Robert L. Barchi and Gov. Phil Murphy’s (D-N.J.) administration are unified in their desire to solidify protections offered under the DACA program, according to an email to The Daily Targum.
U. talk analyzes First Amendment rights RYAN STIESI ASSOCIATE NEWS EDITOR
Protesters rallying in support of a new Dream Act want money directed toward supporting DACA recipients instead of funding other expenditures such as building a wall, militarizing Immigration and Customs Enforcement gear and mass deportations. GARRET STEFFE / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER
“Rutgers was one of the first institutions in the countr y to engage on the DACA issue and remains a national leader,” Devlin said. “President Barchi has led the grassroots effort that has generated more than 33,000 letters to Congress advocating for a legislative solution to the DACA dilemma and will continue to join those advocacy efforts.”
Yesterday Rutgers hosted John Villasenor, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a professor at the UCLA, to discuss his research on college student views of the First Amendment and participate in a discussion on free speech. Villasenor conducted a national survey of 1,500 current undergraduate students at U.S. four-year colleges and universities. It included respondents from 49 states and Washington, D.C. The event was hosted by Undergraduate Academic Affairs and featured a quick presentation by Villasenor followed by moderator questions asked to a panel comprised of two Rutgers students, a Rutgers professor and Villasenor. This was then followed with an open discussion. It began with a question to the crowd.
VOLUME 150, ISSUE 30 • UNIVERSITY ... 3 • OPINIONS ... 6 • INSIDE BEAT... 8 • DIVERSIONS ... 9 • SPORTS ... BACK
“To start, I’m going to just ask for a little audience participation here, the First Amendment confirms or addresses five freedoms, can people tell me what those five are?” Villasenor said to the audience. The audience answered with the right to speech, assembly, religion, to petition the government and the press. He then asked, “What limits does the First Amendment have?” Answers included incitement to imminent lawless action, “true threats” and defamation. Villasenor discussed some results from recent free-speech surveys, including his own. One question he posed in his sur vey was “a public university invites a ver y controversial speaker to an on-campus event. The speaker is known for making offensive and hurtful statements … A student group opposed to the speaker uses violence to prevent the SEE RIGHTS ON PAGE 4