Taxmann's Limited Insolvency Examination MCQs & Case Analysis

Contents % ' !

0

A few lines about this book

I-5

Acknowledgement

I-7

List of Important Cases for Limited Insolvency Examination

I-11

Abbreviations used

I-17

Section-wise reference to the Cases

I-19

Section I Notes on NCLT Cases For Quick Reference: Summaries of NCLT Cases Revision Questions on NCLT Cases Section II Notes on NCLAT Cases For Quick Reference: Summaries of NCLAT Cases Revision Questions on NCLAT Cases Section III Notes on High Court Cases For Quick Reference: Summaries of High Court Cases Revision Questions on High Court Cases Section IV Notes on Supreme Court Cases

3 32 37

45 126 140

157 195 200

209 I-9

3 4 . % 4 . / #

I-10

% ' !

0

For Quick Reference: Summaries of Supreme Court Cases

399

Revision Questions on Supreme Court Cases

421

Multiple Choice Questions: Combined Case Law

449

N1

NCLT, MUMBAI BENCH

Aircel Limited: Corporate Debtor Vijay Kumar Iyer Applicant/ Resolution Professional* v.

Union of India ….. Respondent

HON’BLE MR. M.K. SHRAWAT, MEMBER (J) AND HON’BLE MR. CHANDRA BHAN SINGH, MEMBER (T)

ENE NNOOTD E HNMH TD ITTPE A O O A R O T T I CDSSMI D I G REC TRR G G C N E O V 0 V E E E N N T E N A L P OE O H' T OOA I S RP2 L R T R L R T 0 O E E R P E UE OB #T RD YS C2" EE HH BN D ) B F E T WT R F NH MAA #)EU SYOOU T FD EY B U E T O A BOB KN FH RA R E T WD T A EDOT T OC T AB N DENG R E M EMP W

T OI ON N OEPOM UEOS I I T R RTL PDSTO A A L A S T

U E RE R TC A R E R C O D G O H O N T R S E E T NO PMSROCAT D P E R I O T I O R E YB 3 U T S S OAT SC PS I HP NN@OR HIE ET EE OEFCO RTRD S L O H Y O CCOET D R HE BCE RIEHATRE T H O,STRNOD E U T DER F EUHOIRN AF R E EHG T MRN CO PI I O UNTA UV FWEOW T Y 4R W D ERRNH EOAOBHOU $ C T I H D MEOI O 3 T E NDV P E T A SEE FU ASBM D T HTE E OC CS T N NBEAO F T D W S TE ESC YES A 4C # R C N O E O M B U I HC E T DRYDMAT,R T A H N ! # D L E T O E T R T E NDO S R U S E N R .

R E NU OE OS F OTE I O EIS T IPWNPEVHI I R V T S F S O O I OOTMHUI G E H C R 4 Y C B E

UNCI GP L U E L

E S UER Q5EB HNRA AN

H T I I

UOH EE E ETOC T D D H Y T HS F E C B NNI OP4 T BO P) NT )LN E T E REAH D O DYSFFEO D E CI T O E O E N D O HT I I T D O HEET NUOT T OI , NT C A LLLE R#AGT ) S E P P E E R E SP MMF US HCA OOCS E R O OT A T E N SC R E C0F SCC OA I I PPAE T H E ENV D S 2OB T L W E ECN K E R I E ) ET E HT H HT N4 OU AT MS # DIT T )

MA-337 OF 2018 IN C.P. (IB)-298/(MB)/2018 AND MA-336 OF 2018 IN C.P. (IB)-302/(MB)/2018 ORDER DELIVERED ON 27TH NOVEMBER, 2019

-

f

d

TESF E SO NMOT HARN SNCE I $DAM S N N AER L R C E R SBI V E E O I HC' T IT ME T R N OH EEC T PDE UNLY OUEB RDTE L E G A S T R N HA E R T E I E VC WP EI GOSL NDNM OEIO T L C ISE A MEL RICT E I O, V T R RE E B A H EL ST U $L 'N L EE E V T # A I LDG R N OEA S C PR A RI 'W O! # Y D N N G DA NA ED I P T R I EE M MI T F O F IM O C , LI I S v , E CS,H R S 4 % I E #

!

L A E 2I SR D )

I !N -7h )

Brief facts of the case:

i.e.

*[2020] 114 taxmann.com 347 (NCLT-Mum.)

3

3 % 3 ! # 4 , # .

4

A L HYNY

CNE I A NNN D A H O RPI O WPU S I M S M T ROBO E C OC E S FS C F O I SH RR T0 SI T N H R E EYD RV A 4A E ELCN YR N O O BS EU T D B ONVE ETILR FD O O ENS A L A NC L DEB ) T S OA AA E N I N R D R A F OUL E O P E PR D S DSEL AO T T A N RCNII S OEAEO R

A F HR A P L ST #C PW S Y E AM E

CB DDU OD ONR I RI T AO PA T NP #NA S OA R T"OO I ) I T T U WO FA C

C UR BOI L A# A P !

N F P

A ONA0 OS2 SI H I) G TT U BCH# O EETE R DSDH E R HFEE T T T G T O E D I T )TUNM E /NHU L 'UP DP OUDAM# E 4 AMDL I O " , I AE C ) P D #O LP NI F NA O PA.T ) `

`

ENHS EDEND H B E C E O O N L T I I UE W I T 4T F S A A O O OI C0 NL L I T TSL $I A I A 2 N M EI E DM) E EE R NO#HE F B HAC TT T E T ETSEH A SO L S E A H T E N NOE T ETFTGG HN CPSEN CA I I N U H I UC L I T SS )HTC Y T L/ T UAYI FA A DRNH U'OH N TTNPAT NENGO4PS H E AT NC,MA M I N DF D0#OO Y O . # I 2 N AE I A T E E P4PH E A R HC HO NET T E/I O V$TR FTL A LPDESL HSUPEBN! I !

A T N A F M AEG OOE V Y N I U T DR OAR T I T NC DAAEMBO C V I RAI I SO E A N E A OTP CT S T U C W E EDA3 SMERB I

R EYD# R RMEO RNN" A) OOHFDRA E L T CT EUFEEF B E ERC O L KSO R EE ET IC

AN T D4 O F E T S A NYN C N EFE O I O T O T N A A , R I A P T T O TE R I A O ONHDMC T NMC PE4E I O O U L E RM S DCS CP OT0 S E E P I 2 CR L R E T E A E ) HAC4 E D EP#4T OR HEF/FWI N FU $OTDO 4$O

EENRR L Y T REO B A N D E T R AC A NB OU NUE P PL RAO DM OVCNEO A T CAGL C A N PR ESO L I L HI NOE T TGOPH R I A TI S T O A HSU A C HC A L T T O E U E S SH DSUE U T ESNR J I T OE UA T D G N B D E O R OO L NC A D B L G TAN AU N L O AEAAIW S A C T CN V I ERAA L O R H P CT O ST T I PL I B O AE ES EB S E EHDL N D A E HTT EE T R T OADCA I R N SF L T OA R E N T P O H E ENR T P L OB MUC R FO AIC UOE Y L I GMH L A N R E A4V A H E AOT FG Y O SDE N E U I V S EHAE I P N S E S R E DMN C UI C EL I OAOER C CPCL I EE EDE H HEBT HAT T HRHNT U G OTAO C R F F I NO 0H T I T Y2 E R T B L S UE N )I S $D O#7 A

L F E RDLA A O A OSO E RU N PA .SI I H U D

RHE O ANTHTI S Y C T R OL S A AS F#C)U CN A

E F R F E T EOCONBOT YN F H E OTEN D O H

I T NL BOR T TNT I EPEDC0 D A T A N E MONERN E HEI #0 E OND T EPP ET O W I TE DSR I E T ENU0RR SONU

H E G L T UEO77!

TUO 2E C # GL DS O I ;;E SL R T AX A H MSEE S E T G SP UAH2 TI N R N R R E N Y! T E OC OH AT EL PL T E DN E E T SB NOH PABH A C SHEI OTT H PUY DC ET$H SBB L S I E H W O E E H T T D S R T M A F R

A E V R EUD NWO E T OV V Y HT E RI T ERYSPO C T D R H C BN E T O AE O C E I I R T U PD #S D S H E OU S NSS V EA !

F ) ECCWH E FO NH E#TN R M O K"FA E DT NNU AFA)OE R OWT HOTFNB I T O EO T N OC OO MC I 5EE RN S N U S N

HP U R L DTS T OA EL S

A NTE C

SC L S HO AOH FEE R PR0 OST HNT O E 3L2 PTN SS RI E AENNNO E O R RU S = I E HT HO I A UT TMC T O T T

C C U E O T B A E EK H BG EET E NC S A HDH H YNT A F U T D G T EI DOSS TAN E R R T I R NA T SI N H A A R /R !C PA A A T C -

Centre for Public Interest Litigation Union of India Subramanian Swamy Union of India

f

FDYD#E O B B E N " EW) TAR T E O F O S E N O PH L S L I A v D H SA E M S SI NR E A U AE T N I SNNWR T I I WEROE T O MOMT A C NBR UFR N EOE RO E T H C TV$h O EH E D FN T PG 'A O 3I A R SS EO RH E EOT PS G S NN RUN ESFOAI CAO#LD E I T HN ECE Y , E H T I RET HCR EO O T M Y O HT R T0 T H BUBA T YEGTH0U L H R T $A D 2A GG) EEE UN Y T T O I#N T H T A I S SA A I MRTF T H Y DOTEST L NB APNI D R E E E D TOT OE R A # X EUL ER S HEE HS T BE I HSTE AP I DT RR H L CM E E T EIA H L HC OVWPH E I P IH T WSA R A O BWPONY O D L M U(I R E T E C UE R ED T A E P -VRE O O R UU T I F QR R P 4EE EDSE ,T R D C A ET E #T CNR HA N .3 AAI T

Order of the Tribunal:

) / 5

V

$ 4 , , % # 2 ) !

HY T B I WD E I GP NU OC L A C O DT EU R B A L R C O ET DB SE I D MT E UA I R R O OP T R A O R OCR MDO T EB AN E NWD EOE H T T O A WN R O SP #T R "E )SO FSC A O E E H H T T F N0O O2N I )I O T #S C EFS S E O S RNS E O POP I T SA N I !T I IR N O I

R O S S E L R O R E N W O E H T Y B D E R E V O C E R E B T O N N A # #

E B N AY CT R TE U P BO R YP L L A C I R L E NB EU GP RA OI S ST S E E L S RS OA E RH E T NF WI OT N EE HM T N YR BE DV EO R ' E VE OH CT EY R B ED BE R TE O V NO NC AE #R $

F O L A V O R P P A E H T H T I W Y L N O R O S S E L R O R E N W OY T ER I HO T H YT BU R! E G VN OI T NA EC I KD AU T J ED B! NE AH #T DSN NAO S AT I S LH I O V GO RI R T R N PP I OH S CS I H ER T KER ANE T W D OON T S 5 0A

R 2HO RT O 0T B E 2B )ED FDE O T EA T YA R T O R U OP DP R RO EO C HC T E H SET I H T F TH I O CE T #I "HE )WH FRS O EE VC ON T A

L E S A S B NA OY E I H T NT C EAN S FI D ROE E Y DDD R OO NT 5S C UE CR D E D U L C X E E R A R O T B E D E T A R O P R O C E H T F O N O I S S E S S O P E H T N I T O N S T E S S !

H C I H W S T H G I R P I H S R

E D NE WD U OL SC A N HI E RR OA T B Y ET R DN EU T O A C R ON PG RI OE CR O EF HA T HN CI I D H E WT A RC E O VL OE SB T E Y S A S !M ! "

D E D U L C X E E R A Y T R E P O R P L A U T C E L L E T N I G N I D U L C N I S T E S S A E L B I G N A T N ) #

E T A R O P R O C E H T F O Y R A I D I S B U S Y N A N I D L E H S E R A H S D GE ND I D U UC L L C X NE I E SR E A I T R I R O UT CB EE 3D $

"

ANSWERS

!

2.

1.

M I A L C S I H G N I T T I M B U S R E T F A R O S S E L R O R E N W O E H T Y B D E R E

V0 O2 C E0 R E2 B) H NT AI #W ! "

f

2.

5

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS 1.

Limited Insolvency Examination MCQs & Case Analysis AUTHOR PUBLISHER DATE OF PUBLICATION EDITION ISBN NO NO. OF PAGES BINDING TYPE

: : : : : : :

Raghuram Manchi TAXMANN JUNE 2022 2nd Edition 9789356222021 480 PAPERBACK

Rs. : 1195 | USD : 49

Description This book provides the Case Laws for the Limited Insolvency Examination prescribed by the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India ('IBBI') in the syllabus, revised from 1 st March 2022.

The Present Publication is the 2 nd Edition, authored by Raghuram Manchi, with the following noteworthy features:

·

[Coverage of 60 Judgements] delivered by various Courts & Tribunals and prescribed by IBBI

·

[Simple Language to Understand the Concepts] in the Case Laws, especially from the point of view of passing the Limited Insolvency Examination

·

[Short Notes] are given for each case in the form of an executive summary without resorting to legal jargon(s) or paraphrasing

·

[Section-wise Table] has also been incorporated so that the reader can understand which case is to be read, with the respective section

·

[Summaries of Last-minute Revisions] are incorporated in a tabular format with the following details:

o o ·

o

Case Name Brief Related Section

[350+ MCQs to Test the Readers' Conceptual Understanding] of the respective section as well as the respective case law

ORDER NOW