Taxmann's Analysis | Mediation's Crucial Role in Shaping the Future of Insolvency Resolution

BEYOND COURTROOMS Mediation’s Crucial Role in Shaping the Future of Insolvency Resolution

BEYOND COURTROOMS Mediation’s Crucial Role in Shaping the Future of Insolvency Resolution

l.4iQ4SSm (a5O\A<:m5 m /3gP3TTm(a5O83^CUT\m ( m"^: m ,3L<\m m$3YI<^CT?m m m&=em*VB_4Jm*V4; m&=em =KBD m m S;D4m (AUT< m m 1<6\E`<m m f _4iQ4SS 9VQm R3EMm m ]4K=] _4hQ4SS 9VQ +<?: m '>8<m m m2=]_m)bSH47Dm 4@B m&=em =KBD m m S;D4m <c<LUW<:m5km .4Sm)ZDS_]m S;D4 m)d_ m#_; m m!Q m%DK=m-_VS= m&4_FVS4Km D@Be4j m*VB_4Jm*V4;m 0DNK4@=m*VB4; m D]__ m B4HH4[m 4[j4S4 m S;D4m R3Gm m ]4K=] _4SXZDS_] 9VQ C\8L3CP<Ym : 2AC 27C" 6C ,C+ C70C :0# C 22026C02C0+#66#0,6C#,C7"#6C19 (# 7#0, C ,C61#7 C0 C7"#6 C 22026C+ AC 2 1C#, C -AC+#67 & C 2202C02C 6 2 1 , AC,07 C+ AC C 209 "7C70C092C,07# C <"# "C6" )(C C7 & ,C 2 C0 C#,C7" C, @7C #7#0, C 7C#6C,07# C7" 7C, #7" 2C7" C19 )#6" 2C,02C7" C 97"02C02C6 )( 2C?((C C2 610,6# ( C 2C ,AC + C02C(066C0 C 7#0,C70C ,AC0, C0 C ,AC'#, C#,C ,AC+ ,, 2 C7" 2 0+ C 7C#6C69 67 C7" 7C70C :0# C ,AC 09 7C7" C2 2C6"09* C 2066 " &C )(C 7" C 76 C ( =C , C 0,7 ,76C 0 C7" C 19 )# 7#0,C ?7"C 03#!. (C 0: 5+ ,7C 19 )# 7#0,C 02C ,07# 7#0,6 C 0C1 27C0 C7"#6C 00&C+ AC C2 120 9 C02C 01# C#,C ,AC 2+C02C AC ,AC + ,6C 2 1"# C ( 720,# C02C+ " ,# ( C$. (9 #, C1"070 01B, C2 02 #, C7 1#, C02C#, 2+ 7#0,C2 74 : (C 6A67 +6 C 02C 2 120 9 C 0,C ,AC #6 C 7 1 C 1 2 2 7 C + # C 02C 07" 2C #, 2+ 7#0,C 6702 C ;# C 7 C>#7"097C8 C=2#77 ,C1 2+#66#0,C0 C7" C19 )#6" 26 C 2 "C0 C7"#6C 0, #7#0,C#6C(# ( C 2C( (C 7#0, C ((C #6197 6C 2 C69 % 7C70C ("#C%92#6 # 7#0,C0/A C

Contents 1.

Difference between Mediation, Conciliation, and Adjudication

6

2.

Typical Mediation Process in India

6

3.

Potential Advantages Which Mediation Can Bring to the IBC Arena

6

4.

Existing Mediation Landscape in India

7

5.

Navigating the Data: Resolved Insolvency Cases Out of Court

7

6.

Maintaining Insolvency Mediations Within the IBC Framework

8

7.

Objective of Insolvency Mediation Framework under the Code

8

8.

Committee Recommendation: Voluntary Mediation in the Indian Insolvency Regime

8

9.

Mediation in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

8

10.

Mediators: Qualifications and Criteria

10

11.

Conclusion

11

Beyond Courtrooms: Mediation’s Crucial Role in Shaping the Future of Insolvency Resolution

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code of 2016 in India is undergoing a thoughtful evaluation by the IBBI’s Expert Committee. The committee was tasked with exploring the potential use of mediation to resolve disputes within the framework of the Code.

In their report, the committee has proposed for incorporating mediation as an additional method for dispute resolution. Taking a balanced approach, the committee emphasizes the fundamental goals of the Code - ensuring timely reorganization and maximizing value. Furthermore, the report acknowledges the autonomy of involved parties, encouraging voluntary ‘out-of-court’ mediation to enhance the efficiency of the resolution process. The committee suggests a gradual introduction of voluntary mediation, ensuring it complements existing insolvency resolution processes and adheres to established timelines. The key takeaways from the report are as follows:

Beyond Courtrooms: Mediation’s Crucial Role in Shaping the Future of Insolvency Resolution

1.

Difference between Adjudication

Mediation,

Conciliation,

and

Mediation: A non-adversarial process where a third party mainly facilitates communication and negotiation between disputing parties. The outcome is a mutually acceptable agreement, enforceable as a contract, and not subject to appeal or challenge in court.

Conciliation: Also a non-adversarial process, involving a third party who plays an active and suggestive role in assisting the disputing parties to settle. The conciliation order/decree is not appealable, and limited grounds exist for setting it aside.

Adjudication: An adversarial process where a third party, usually a court or tribunal, decides the outcome of the dispute based on evidence and arguments presented by the parties. The decision is binding and enforceable, subject to appeal or revision under applicable laws.

2. Typical Mediation Process in India The Mediation Process in India undertakes following procedures: (a)

Reference of Dispute to Mediation:

(b)

Identification of Mediator

(c)

Mediation Proceedings Commence

(d)

First Meeting Opening Session

(e)

Submission of Writing Notes/Position Papers/ Documents

(f)

One-on-One Sessions with Both Parties

(g)

Joint Session with Both Parties

(h)

Closing Session: Mediation Outcome (Failure/Partial Settlement/Complete Settlement)

3. Potential Advantages Which Mediation Can Bring to the IBC Arena

6

(a)

Time and Cost Efficiency: Mediation offers a quicker and more cost-effective alternative to litigation, addressing delays inherent in court proceedings and negotiations.

(b)

Flexibility and Autonomy: Parties can customize the resolution process to meet their specific needs within legal parameters, unlike rigid litigation procedures.

(c)

Business Relationship Preservation: Mediation promotes collaborative problemsolving, nurturing better relationships and mitigating adversarial dynamics.

Beyond Courtrooms: Mediation’s Crucial Role in Shaping the Future of Insolvency Resolution

(d)

Confidentiality: Mediation proceedings maintain confidentiality, safeguarding sensitive business information and reputational concerns in insolvency matters.

4. Existing Mediation Landscape in India The absence of specific provisions for mediation in insolvency and bankruptcy disputes under the IBC underscores the importance of the Mediation Act, 2023, which aims to promote mediation for the resolution of disputes across various sectors. However, the success of mediation relies on the parties’ willingness to engage in the process and trust its effectiveness.

Despite the enactment of the 2023 Act, there remains a cultural shift necessary to establish mediation as a trusted method of dispute resolution. The Committee’s examination of the changes introduced by the 2023 Act and the existing legal landscape in India reveals a need for structured frameworks and trained mediators to enhance the perception and success of mediation, particularly within commercial cases.

These insights have informed the Committee’s deliberations on implementing mediation within the IBC, recognizing the gaps within the current legal framework and the regulatory efforts initiated by the 2023 Act to address them.

5. Navigating the Data: Resolved Insolvency Cases Out of Court The IBC data suggests the potential for resolving many insolvency cases out of court, reducing the NCLT’s burden. However, the lack of comprehensive statistical data on mediation’s use and success rates is attributed to absent Code provisions and a weak mediation culture.

NCLT disposal data from 2017-2022 shows over 23,500 CIRP applications resolved pre-admission, comprising over 68.74% of total disposals. By September 2023, 7054 CIRPs were initiated, resulting in creditors realizing Rs. 3.16 lakh crores under resolution plans.

Among these, 5057 cases closed with various outcomes including rescuing the corporate debtor in 1053 cases, settling 947 cases under Section 12A, and approving resolution plans in 808 cases. Liquidation commenced in 2249 cases.

Additionally, distressed companies are proactively resolving issues early, with 26518 CIRP applications withdrawn before admission, reflecting a trend of early distress resolution.

In conclusion, the Committee acknowledges the compelling evidence from data and judicial orders indicating a significant potential for mediation in settling and withdrawing insolvency disputes. Particularly, OC-initiated CIRPs have shown promise for settlement, especially at early pre-admission stages. Thus, these cases are deemed suitable for utilizing mediation as a dispute resolution tool for achieving settlements effectively.

7

Beyond Courtrooms: Mediation’s Crucial Role in Shaping the Future of Insolvency Resolution

6. Maintaining Insolvency Mediations Within the IBC Framework The Committee observed that while the Mediation Act, 2023 does not restrict the introduction of a mediation regime under any law such as the Code, its “one-sizefits-all” approach would not be suitable for insolvency mediation. This is due to the unique objectives and statutory timelines of the IBC, which are incompatible with those of the 2023 Act. Therefore, the Committee recommends maintaining insolvency mediations as self-contained within the IBC framework.

The Committee was of the view that the blanket introduction of mediation as contemplated under the 2023 Act does not meet the core elements or objects of IBC. Incorporation of mediation into the Indian insolvency regime will require a specific, tailor-made mechanism to suit each insolvency resolution process or its constituents.

7. Objective of Insolvency Mediation Framework under the Code The main object of a specialized insolvency mediation framework is to facilitate and recognise mediation as a statutory dispute resolution mechanism for expediting the resolution of insolvency disputes that enter the judicial system without compromising the statutory timelines.

8. Committee Recommendation: Voluntary Mediation in the Indian Insolvency Regime The Committee deliberated extensively on the choice between mandatory and voluntary mediation in the Indian insolvency framework. While mandatory mediation can encourage early dispute resolution and eliminate parties’ concerns about appearing weak, voluntary mediation respects parties’ autonomy and increases the likelihood of successful outcomes.

After careful consideration, the Committee recommends voluntary mediation, allowing parties to engage willingly without forcing unwilling parties into a mandatory process. Parties must approach and inform the NCLT of their intent to mediate, ensuring that mediation runs parallel to statutory processes and timelines under the Code. Moreover, provisions for mediation before approaching the NCLT in specific types of cases, such as claims’ collation stage, may be considered.

9. Mediation in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process The Committee examined how mediation could be applied to different stages of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) to address specific circumstances and issues more effectively than litigation before the NCLT.

8

Beyond Courtrooms: Mediation’s Crucial Role in Shaping the Future of Insolvency Resolution

9.1 Stage I: Pre-commencement stage: The Committee suggests utilizing the significant time gap between the occurrence of default, filing, and admission of applications under the IBC for mediation to resolve differences effectively. Specifically, mediation could assist Operational Creditors (OCs) in resolving disputes with the Corporate Debtor (CD) at the admission stage.

Additionally, the Committee observed that Financial Creditors (FCs) often resolve issues amicably before approaching the NCLT under the IBC, highlighting the potential for mediation in these cases as well.

9.2 Stage II: Post-commencement / admission of CIRP This stage involves the period after admission of the CIRP by an order of the NCLT. The Committee was of the view that limited application of mediation exists at this advanced stage of proceedings as presumably all amicable dispute resolution mechanisms have failed earlier and the dispute as such could not be resolved.

The Committee acknowledges practical limitations to the use of mediation in India’s creditor-led insolvency resolution process, particularly at the post-admission stage where hostile promoters and suspended directors may be unwilling to mediate.

Additionally, Section 29A of the IBC technically prohibits negotiations with ineligible promoters.

Therefore, the Committee suggests excluding post-admission stage cases from mediation in the initial phase to assess its efficacy and prevent potential litigations. It proposes utilizing the withdrawal of the application process to encourage mediation, emphasizing the importance of preserving third-party interests.

9.3 Stage III: Approval of Resolution Plan The Committee highlighted that litigation, especially challenges to bid rejections or resolution plan approvals, significantly delays the insolvency resolution process.

Dissatisfaction among Operational Creditors (OCs) and other stakeholders when their claims are wiped away by resolution plans often leads to disputes.

While the NCLT may suggest mediation to resolve such disputes, particularly involving major OCs, it can only proceed with the consent of all parties involved.

However, involving multiple parties like OCs, Committee of Creditors (CoC), and Resolution Applicants (RA) in mediation may prove cumbersome and potentially futile, ultimately failing to address delays in the resolution process.

9.4 Stage IV: Implementation of Resolution Plan The committee suggested a mediation clause in the resolution plan to resolve disputes or conflicts that may arise during implementation. Mediation aims to prevent liquidation by resolving issues such as creditor priorities and distribution of funds. It emphasizes that mediation should adhere strictly to the agreed terms of the resolution plan, with no room for additional modifications except mutually agreed extensions.

9

Beyond Courtrooms: Mediation’s Crucial Role in Shaping the Future of Insolvency Resolution

The process assumes that all parties share the common goal of implementing the plan to avoid liquidation, thus promoting smoother implementation and contributing to the effectiveness of the IBC.

9.5 Stage V: Liquidation Stage The Committee holds that initiating liquidation proceedings typically indicates exhaustion of options for enterprise revival or creditor settlement, minimizing the scope for mediation. As all potential issues are presumed to have been addressed by this stage, the Committee views mediation at the liquidation stage as least beneficial, potentially leading to further loss in enterprise value and hindering the IBC’s objective of maximizing value.

Additionally, mediation may not be effective when the corporate debtor’s continuation is unfeasible. Therefore, the Committee does not recommend mediation at the liquidation stage during the initial implementation phase.

10. Mediators: Qualifications and Criteria Given the complex and technical nature of insolvency disputes, the Committee recommends that the pool of mediators include:

10

(a)

Retired members of the NCLT and NCLAT;

(b)

Senior advocates and/or advocates with advocacy experience in more than ten (10) successful insolvency proceedings;

(c)

Ex-senior officials of financial sector regulators, such as IBBI, or scheduled commercial banks; and

(d)

Insolvency professionals with more than ten (10) years of experience.

(e)

To this end, the Committee recommends the formation of an additional pool of mediators comprising:

(f)

Legal practitioners with at least ten (10) years of experience in insolvency disputes;

(g)

Persons with experience as mediators or in mediation advocacy in commercial disputes for at least ten (10) years; and

(h)

Persons with technical expertise in insolvency, accounting, valuation, sectoral, and industry operations possessing experience of at least ten (10) years.

Beyond Courtrooms: Mediation’s Crucial Role in Shaping the Future of Insolvency Resolution

11. Conclusion In conclusion, the Expert Committee’s thorough examination of the potential integration of mediation within the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) framework reflects a nuanced understanding of the intricate balance between expediency and fairness in resolving disputes.

By advocating for the voluntary introduction of mediation, the Committee prioritizes the autonomy of involved parties while recognizing the need for efficient disputeresolution mechanisms. This approach not only aligns with the core objectives of the IBC, namely timely reorganization and value optimization but also acknowledges the unique challenges and opportunities present within the insolvency landscape.

As India navigates the evolving complexities of insolvency resolution, the Committee’s forward-thinking approach underscores the pivotal role of mediation as a cornerstone in promoting a more agile, collaborative, and equitable insolvency ecosystem, poised to drive sustainable economic growth and recovery.

11

About Us Our Vision Our vision is to achieve perfection, skill and accuracy in everything we do.

What started as a small family business in 1972, Taxmann has become a technology-oriented Publishing/Product company with independent Research & Editorial, Production, Sales & Marketing and Technology divisions. These four functions went on to become the backbone of Taxmann. Through our most recent venture, Taxmann Advisory, we intend to provide consistent, personalised, compliant and practical solutions to all your consulting requirements.

Our Mission 'Spearheading the pursuit of expertise and authenticity' Our mission at Taxmann, as a publication and an online research platform, has been to provide the most authentic and fastest information reporting. We are proud to be the #1 source for everything on Tax & Corporate Laws of India. We have over 60 years of domain knowledge and trust from more than 15 million legal professionals nationwide.

Taxmann Advisory is committed to providing premium tax advisory services at a fast pace and affordable price. We provide advice which is easy to understand and practical from an implementation perspective.

Our Strength Taxmann owes its success to its core strength – the Editorial and Research Division. It comprises a highly motivated group of over 200 associates from the legal community (i.e., Lawyers, chartered accountants, and company secretaries) who monitor all the developments in the judicial, administrative and legislative fields and process the information with impeccable perfection, skill and accuracy.

After being established as a successful publishing and product development company, our distinguished panel of experts is now geared to help businesses easily understand and deal with complex tax and regulatory requirements.

Use our Legacy to your Advantage

Naveen holds expertise in Advisory and litigation related to Income-tax and International Tax matters. Naveen has extensive experience working with diversified industries like real estate, technology, publication, education, hospitality, manufacturing, etc. He writes and regularly speaks on Income-tax issues for renowned media houses.

Highlights

Naveen Wadhwa

Project Lead–Research and Advisory (Corporate and Personal Tax)

• Chartered Accountant (All India 24th Rank) • 14+ Years of Experience in Income-tax and International Tax • Previously worked with Grant Thornton • Experience in Real Estate, Technology, Publication, Hospitality, etc.

Dr. Vinod K. Singhania got his PhD from the Delhi School of Economics in 1976. His field of interest includes all facets of corporate legislation and corporate economics, especially tax laws. He is associated in different capacities with several professional institutes and business houses in India and abroad. He has authored many popular books and software on Income-tax.

Vinod K. Singhania Expert on Panel – Research and Advisory (Direct Taxation)

Highlights • 35+ Years of Experience in Corporate and Personal Taxation • Resource person in over 800 seminars • Author of various books on Direct Tax laws used by large number of professionals and Department officials

V.S. Datey specialises in laws relating to GST, Customs Duty, including Foreign Trade Policy, SEZ, and other erstwhile Indirect Taxes (such as Central Excise, Service Tax, etc.). He has been working in the field of Indirect Taxation since 1993.

Highlights • Holds 30+ years of experience

V.S. Datey

Expert on Panel – Research and Advisory (Indirect Taxation)

• Engaged in consulting and training professionals on Indirect Taxation • A regular speaker at various industry forums, associations and industry workshops • Author of various books on Indirect Taxation used by professionals and Department officials

SS Gupta has expertise in indirect taxation, specifically in the services sector. He is a faculty member in the colleges/institutions to teach indirect tax and is associated with various social organisations.

He has also contributed extensively to the field of indirect taxation in various seminars/lectures.

Highlights

S.S. Gupta

Expert on Panel – Research and Advisory (Indirect Taxation)

• Chartered Accountant and Cost & Works Accountant • 34+ Years of Experience in Indirect Taxation • Bestowed with numerous prestigious scholarships and prizes • Author of the book - GST How to Meet Your Obligations, GST on Services, which is very widely referred to by Trade and Industry

Adv. (Dr.) Manoj Fogla has served charitable and voluntary organisations in diversified sectors, including educational & religious institutions, civil society organisations, environmental agencies, international donor agencies, and several large corporate foundations. Dr. Fogla has provided a full range of services related to Advisory, contract reviews, organisational restructuring, compliance management and litigation support to Indian and International clients for their work in the charity domain.

Manoj Fogla

Expert on Panel– Research and Advisory (Charitable Trusts and NGOs)

Highlights • Over three decades of practising experience on tax, legal and regulatory aspects of NPOs and Charitable Institutions • Law practitioner, a fellow member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and also holds a Master's degree in Philosophy • PhD from Utkal University, Doctoral Research on Social Accountability Standards for NPOs • Author of several best-selling books for professionals, including the recent one titled 'Trust and NGO's Ready Reckoner' by Taxmann • Drafted publications for the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, New Delhi, such as FAQs on GST for NPOs & FAQs on FCRA for NPOs. • Has been a faculty and resource person at various national and international forums

Sudha G. Bhushan Expert on Panel– Research and Advisory (FEMA)

Ms. Sudha G. Bhushan is a member of ICAI and ICSI. She is also an Insolvency Resolution Professional and a Registered Valuer. She is an advisor to the Bank of Baroda and is empanelled with HDFC Bank. She is an Independent Director with Aurionpro Solutions Limited, Choice International Limited, DIGJAM Limited and Matix Fertilisers and Chemicals Ltd. She is an expert in India's FDI Policy and FEMA and has worked in the area for over two decades. She has authored many books on FDI, FEMA and International Taxation.

Highlights • 20+ Years of experience • Advisor to many Banks and MNCs • Experience in FDI and FEMA Advisory • Authored more than seven best-selling books • Provides training on FEMA to professionals • Experience in many sectors, including banking, fertilisers, and chemical • Has previously worked with Deloitte.

Delhi: 59/32, New Rohtak Road, New Delhi - 110005 (India) Tel: +91-11-45562222 Email: sales@taxmann.com Mumbai: 35, Bodke Building, Ground Floor, MG Road, Opp. Mulund Railway Station, Mulund (W), Mumbai - 400080 Tel: +91-022-25934806/07/09 Email: sales.mumbai@taxmann.com Ahmedabad: 7, Abhinav Arcade, Ground Floor, Nr. Bank of Baroda, Pritam Nagar Paldi, Ahmedabad - 380007 Tel: +91-079-26589600/02/03 Email: sales.ahmedabad@taxmann.com Hyderabad: 4-1-369-Indralok Commercial Complex Shop No. 15/1 - Ground Floor, Beside Hotel Jaya International Reddy Hostel Lane Abids Hyderabad - 500001 Mobile: +91-9391041461 Email: sales.hyderabad@taxmann.com Pune: Office No. 14, First Floor, Prestige Point, 283 Shukrwar Peth, Opp.Chinchechi Talim, Nr. BSNL office, Bajirao Road, Pune - 411002 Mobile: 9822411811 Email: sales.pune@taxmann.com

www.taxmann.com