URBAN GRAFT U r ban Adaptation of I ndig enous Spatial Qualities
2012 - 2013 EmTech: Emergent Technologies and Design Architectural Association School of Architecture
YUCHEN Wang
TEJAS Sidnal
YUNFU Yi
ABHINAV A Champaneri
DESIGN APPROACH
Case Study
Analysis Open Spaces
Derived Logic and Data
Generation
Indigenous Setting
Spatial Continuity Culturally relevant spaces Environmental responses
Quality Block Level
Culturally and Environmentally distinct
Semi Public Spaces Public Spaces
Cluster Level
Urban Setting
Density
DESIGN APPROACH
Case Study
Analysis Open Spaces
Derived Logic and Data
Generation
Indigenous Setting
Spatial Continuity Culturally relevant spaces Environmental responses
Quality Block Level
Culturally and Environmentally distinct
Semi Public Spaces Public Spaces
Cluster Level
Urban Setting
Density
Socially Relevant Open Spaces Variation in Spatial Quality and Density ‘…ƒ–‹‘Â? ’‡…‹Ƥ… ”…Š‹–‡…–—”ƒŽ †‡Â?–‹–›
CASE STUDY Environmentally and Culturally Distinct 'LVWLQFW &RQŹJXUDWLRQ RI 6RFLDO VSDFHV
Ranwar Village
Nan Chi Zi
Mumbai, India
Beijing, China
Moderate variation in temperature 20 to 38 degree Celsius
ǣ ͟͜͡ ͟͜͜ ǣ ͜Ǥ͝͝ ͞ ǣ ͜͜͞ Ȁ
Semi Public Space Public Space
High variation in temperature -10 to 36 degree Celsius
ǣ͟͜͡ ͟͜͜ ǣ ͜Ǥ͝͝ ͞ ǣ ͟͜͜ Ȁ
CASE STUDY Spatial Arrangement & Distribution MUMBAI
BEIJING
Public Space
Public spaces in the IRUP RI &KRZNV
Public spaces in the IRUP RI +XWRQJV
CASE STUDY Spatial Arrangement & Distribution MUMBAI
BEIJING
Open Semi Public Space Covered Semi Public Space
Frontyards
Courtyards
PA R A M E T E R S BLOCK LEVEL
CLUSTER LEVEL
Semi Public Spaces
Public Spaces
Open Space Ratio Hierarchy Enclosure Sky View Factor Orientation Solar Shading
Cluster organisation Hierarchy Enclosure Sky View Factor Orientation
Environmental Responses
E M Of Built and Open Spaces
S Socio- Cultural
B LO C K L E V E L
B LO C K L E V E L - C A S E S T U D Y MUMBAI Case Studies
Open Space
͝
͞
͟
4
͡
6
7
8
Open Space Distribution
Average size : 60 sq m
Enclosure Sky-View
Connectivity
Semi public space size (m2)
55
57
135
28
92
64
53
45
Orientation
BEIJING ͝
͞
͟
4
͡
6
7
8
Fitness Criteria
Average size : 70 sq m Semi public space size (m2)
185
104
81
56
110
45
150
96
B LO C K L E V E L - C A S E S T U D Y Open space ratio_OSR
MUMBAI
Semi public space v/s Built area _ OSR
Case Studies
Open Space Ratio
Open Space Distribution
Average OSR : 35 %
Enclosure Sky-View
Connectivity
Semi public space to total build up area ratio
40%
36%
36%
32%
45%
37%
43%
46%
27%
27%
35%
Orientation
BEIJING
Fitness Criteria
Average OSR : 31 % Semi public space to total build up area ratio
26%
36%
32%
28%
37%
B LO C K L E V E L - C A S E S T U D Y Hierarchy of semi public space
Case Studies
MUMBAI
Private
Open Space
Covered semi public
Open Space Distribution
Semi public
Enclosure Public space
Sky-View
Connectivity
Orientation
Hierarchy Level : 4 BEIJING
Private
Fitness Criteria
Semi public
Public space
Hierarchy Level : 3
B LO C K L E V E L - C A S E S T U D Y Enclosure Factor (EV) Enclosure Factor (EV) Case Studies
Open Space
Open Space Distribution
Enclosure Sky-View
Connectivity
Orientation
Fitness Criteria
EV
B LO C K L E V E L - C A S E S T U D Y Enclosure Factor (EV) Enclosure Factor (EV) Case Studies
MUMBAI
Open Space
Enclosure Value : 1.37
Open Space Distribution
Enclosure Value : 2.00
Enclosure Value : 1.1
Enclosure
Enclosure Range : 1.1 - 1.5 Sky-View
Connectivity Enclosure value
Orientation
1.37
2.0
1.1
1.82
0.98
1.53
1.28
1.16
BEIJING
Enclosure Value : 2.94
Fitness Criteria
Enclosure Value : 2.82
Enclosure Value : 3.14
Enclosure Range : 2.5 - 3.0 EV
Enclosure value
2.94
2.82
3.14
2.94
2.57
2.71
2.16
2.48
B LO C K L E V E L - E X P E R I M E N T Enclosure Factor (EV)
Case Studies
Open Space
Corner
͞
͟
Centre
4 Surfaces
Open Space Distribution
Location of Semi public spaces
Enclosure
Corner Sky-View
Centre
Connectivity
Orientation
Fitness Criteria
͝Ǥ͝͞ ͝Ǥ͜͡
B LO C K L E V E L - C A S E S T U D Y Sky View Factor (SVF)
Case Studies
6N\ 9LHZ )DFWRU 69)
Open Space
Open Space Distribution
Enclosure Sky-View
Connectivity
Orientation
Fitness Criteria
SVF
B LO C K L E V E L - C A S E S T U D Y Sky View Factor (SVF)
Case Studies
6N\ 9LHZ )DFWRU 69)
MUMBAI
”…Š‹–‡…–—”ƒŽ •’‡…–•
‹œ‡
Open Space
Ž‘– ”‡ƒ
‹‡”ƒ”…Š›
Open Space Distribution
Enclosure ÇŁ ÍœÇ¤Í˘Í&#x;
Sky-View
ÇŁ ÍœÇ¤ÍĄÍ&#x;
Connectivity
ÇŁ ÍœÇ¤ÍŁÍ
69) 5DQJH
Orientation Sky view factor
‹‡™‹�‰ ƒ�‰Ž‡ ˆ”‘� …‡�–”‡ ‘ˆ ‘’‡� •’ƒ…‡
0.63
0.53
0.74
0.51
0.68
0.52
0.62
0.57
BEIJING
�ƒŽ›•‹•
š’‡”‹�‡�–
‡•‹‰� �’—–
Fitness Criteria
ÇŁ ÍœÇ¤ÍĄÍĽ
SVF
ÇŁ ÍœÇ¤ÍĄÍœ
ÇŁ ÍœÇ¤ÍŁÍ¤
69) 5DQJH
‹•‹„Ž‡ �› ”‡ƒ ”‘Œ‡…–‡† ”‡ƒ Sky view factor
0.59
0.50
0.78
0.48
0.53
0.58
0.57
0.46
B LO C K L E V E L - C A S E S T U D Y Orientation
Case Studies
MUMBAI
Open Space
Open Space Distribution
Enclosure ǣ Ǧ
Sky-View
Connectivity
Orientation
BEIJING
East
East
Fitness Criteria
ǣ Ǧ
Oriented along: Mumbai Beijing 25 % North - South 70 % East - West
30 %
75 %
B LO C K L E V E L - C A S E S T U D Y Floor area ratio (F.A.R) Floor area ratio (F.A.R) Case Studies
Open Space
Open Space Distribution
Enclosure Sky-View
,QGLJHQRXV 6HWWOHPHQW
Connectivity
) $ 5
Orientation
Fitness Criteria
Ǥ Ǥ
8UEDQ ,QIUDVWUXFWXUH F.A.R : 3.0
B LO C K L E V E L From Case Studies 64 m͞ per public space
Size of Semi - Public
Hierarchy
͝
͞
semi
͟
Open Space Ratio
͞͡τ ͟͜ τ
Enclosure Factor
͝Ǥ͝ ͝Ǥ͡
Sky-View Factor
ǣ ͜Ǥ͡
South Facing Surface
Other Aspects Plot Area
Open Space Distribution
Connectivity
Ǥ Ǥ
B LO C K L E V E L - D E S I G N I N P U T Plot Sizes
Case Studies
Plot Sizes
͜͞
Open Space
͜͠
Open Space Distribution
Enclosure Sky-View
Connectivity
Orientation
͟͞
Fitness Criteria
͝
͞
͟
B LO C K L E V E L - D E S I G N I N P U T Semi - Public Distribution
Case Studies
Plot Sizes
͜͞
͟͞
͜͠
Open Space
Open Space Distribution
Enclosure
͝
͟
͞
Open Space Distribution
Sky-View
Connectivity
Orientation
Closest point
Random point
Corner
F.A.R : 1.35
F.A.R : 0.91
F.A.R : 0.87
F.A.R : 0.95
F.A.R : 0.82
F.A.R : 0.68
Centre
F.A.R : 0.67
F.A.R : 0.62
F.A.R : 0.61
Fitness Criteria
B LO C K L E V E L - D E S I G N I N P U T Semi - Public Distribution
Case Studies
Plot Sizes
͜͞
͟͞
͜͠
Open Space
Open Space Distribution
͝
Enclosure
Ȁ ƪ ȋƤ Ȍ
Sky-View
͟
͞
Ȁ ƪ ȋ Ȍ
Connectivity
Orientation ͟͞
͟͞
Ǥ Ǥ ǣ ͝Ǥͤ͡
Ǥ Ǥ ǣ ͞Ǥ͝͝
Fitness Criteria ͜͠
͜͠
Ǥ Ǥ ǣ ͝Ǥͤ͟
Ǥ Ǥ ǣ ͞Ǥͤ͜
B LO C K L E V E L - F I T N E S S C R I T E R I A Connectivity
Connectivity Logic Rule 1 : ‘��‡…–‹�‰ ‡�‹ —„Ž‹… ’ƒ…‡• „› ƒ�’• ƒ�† –ƒ‹”…ƒ•‡•
Case Studies
”…Š‹–‡…–—”ƒŽ •’‡…–•
‹œ‡
Open Space
Ž‘– ”‡ƒ
‹‡”ƒ”…Š›
Open Space Distribution
Enclosure Sky-View
Connectivity
Orientation
Rule 2 :
�ƒŽ›•‹•
’–‹Â?‹•‹Â?‰ ‹”…—Žƒ–‹‘Â? ‡Â?‰–Š Č‹ ČŒ –‘ Ž‡•• –ŠƒÂ? Í˘Íœ
š’‡”‹�‡�–
‡•‹‰� �’—–
Fitness Criteria
Ěź ƒš ÇŁ Í˘Íœ
B LO C K G E N E R AT I O N Urban Infrastructure
Indigenous Settlement ‰‰”‡‰ƒ–‹‘� Dimension
š’‡”‹�‡�–•
ƒ�†
Design Input ‡�‹ —„Ž‹… ’ƒ…‡ ‹œ‡
Ž‘– ‹œ‡
Ž‘– ‹œ‡
Block Footprint
Block Footprint
‘��‡…–‹˜‹–› ‹–Š –”‡‡–
Sky view Factor
Ž‘‘” ˜‡”ŠƒÂ?‰ š’‡”‹Â?‡Â?– Í?
Ž‘‘” ƥ•‡– ‘‰‹…
š’‡”‹�‡�– ͞
Semi public Space Location
š’‡”‹Â?‡Â?– Í&#x;
Semi public Space Distribution
Orientation
Fitness Criteria ‘—–Š ƒ…‹�‰ Surface Ratio
‘—–Š ƒ…‹�‰ Surface Ratio
Open Space Ratio
Open Space Ratio Enclosure
Density Requirement
š’‡”‹Â?‡Â?– Í
Enclosure
š’‡”‹�‡�– ͥ
‘��‡…–‹˜‹–› ‘‰‹…
Ž‘…�
Q Quality
D Density
B LO C K G E N E R AT I O N Remapping Parameters
ĎŽ Í?Ǥ͜
Í?Ǥ͜
͞Ǥͥ Í&#x;Ǥ͜
Ď? Í&#x;Ǥ͜
‡�ƒ’’‹�‰ ƒ”ƒ�‡–‡”•
͜
ÍœÇ¤ÍŁÍĄ
Í?
‹ƥ‡”‡Â?–‹ƒŽ ‡‹‰Š–‹Â?‰ ĎŽ Í?ÍœĎ„
‡•– ‡�‡”ƒ–‹‘�
Í?ÍœĎ„
Í?Í Ď„
ÍžÍœĎ„
Ď? ÍžÍœĎ„
OSR ”‹‰‹�ƒŽ ˜ƒŽ—‡ ͜
͜ǤÍ
Í?
‹�ƒŽ ‡�‡”ƒ–‹‘� ‘™‡•–
–ƒ”‰‡–
domain value
Evaluation
Sky View Factor
Ď? ͤ͜ Â?
‹‰Š‡•– –ƒ”‰‡–
Í&#x;Íœ Â?
”‹‰‹�ƒŽ ‘�ƒ‹�
CL
͜ Target Domain
ĎŽ Í&#x;Íœ Â?
domain value
”…Š‹–‡…–—”ƒŽ •’‡…–•
Ž‘…� ƒ–ƒŽ‘‰—‡
ͤ͜ �
0
1
Ď? Í?͢τ
Í? Í?͢τ
Í?Í?Ď„
ͤτ
ώ ͤτ
ƒ”‰‡– ˜ƒŽ—‡ SFR
͜ ͜
͜ǤÍ&#x;ͤ
Í? ͞ǤÍ?
Í?ǤÍ?
Í&#x;
EV
͜
ÍœÇ¤ÍĄÍž
Í?
B LO C K G E N E R AT I O N Differential Weighting Q
͜τ
͜͞τ
D
Quality
͜͜͝τ
Density
OSR
ơ
CL SFR Ȁ ͜
͜Ǥͣ͡
͡
EV ơ base on quality and density
͟Ǥͣ͡
FAR
͜Ǥ͜͠
Evaluation
͞
͜Ǥͤ͜
͝
͝Ǥ͜͜
͝
͜Ǥͤ͟
͝
͜Ǥ͡͞
OSR
͝Ǥ͜͜
Sky View Factor
͝
CL
͜Ǥͤ͟
SFR
͜Ǥ͡͞
EV
Q
D
= FAR x 5
͜͡τ ͜͡τ = 0.75 x 5
͞
x VD + OSR x 2 + CL x 1
+ SFR x 1
+ EV x 1
x VQ
x 1
+ 0.38 x 1
+ 0.52 x 1
x 1
+ 0.40 x 2 + 1.00 x 1
B LO C K G E N E R AT I O N Differential Weighting
‡�ƒ’’‹�‰ ƒ”ƒ�‡–‡”•
‹ƥ‡”‡Â?–‹ƒŽ ‡‹‰Š–‹Â?‰
‡•– ‡�‡”ƒ–‹‘�
Block Generation ‡•‹‰� �’—–
‹�ƒŽ ‡�‡”ƒ–‹‘�
Plot Size Medium
Large Í Íœ š Í Íœ Â?
Evaluation
Sky View Factor
Open Space Ratio Enclosure
Q Quality
‘��‡…–‹˜‹–› ‘‰‹… Ǥ Ǥ
D Density
Genetic Algorithm
Q Quality
‘—–Š ƒ…‹�‰ Surface Ratio
ÍžÍ Âš ÍžÍ Â?
Fitness Criteria
”…Š‹–‡…–—”ƒŽ •’‡…–•
Ž‘…� ƒ–ƒŽ‘‰—‡
Small
Í&#x;Íž š Í&#x;Íž Â?
D Density
Typology 1
Typology 2
Typology 3
8 Blocks
8 Blocks
8 Blocks
Q ‹‰Š —ƒŽ‹–› Blocks
Q
D
‡†Ǥ —ƒŽ‹–› ĆŹ Density Blocks
D ‹‰Š ‡�•‹–› Blocks
B LO C K G E N E R AT I O N Differential weighting Q
D
Í˘ÍœĎ„ Í ÍœĎ„
‡�ƒ’’‹�‰ ƒ”ƒ�‡–‡”•
Q
D
ÍŁÍœĎ„ Í&#x;ÍœĎ„
Q
D
Í¤ÍœĎ„ ÍžÍœĎ„
Typology 1 Quality option
‹ƥ‡”‡Â?–‹ƒŽ ‡‹‰Š–‹Â?‰
‡•– ‡�‡”ƒ–‹‘�
˜‡”ƒ‰‡ ÇŁ
Í?Ç¤ÍŁÍœ
Í?Ç¤ÍŁÍœ
Í?Ǥ͢͞
‹‰Š‡•– ǣ
͞Ǥ͜Í?
͞Ǥ͜Í?
Í?ǤͤÍ&#x;
Q
D
ÍĄÍœĎ„ ÍĄÍœĎ„
‹�ƒŽ ‡�‡”ƒ–‹‘�
Q
D
ÍĄÍœĎ„ ÍĄÍœĎ„
Q
D
ÍĄÍœĎ„ ÍĄÍœĎ„
Typology 2
Evaluation
Quality-Density option Sky View Factor
”…Š‹–‡…–—”ƒŽ •’‡…–•
˜‡”ƒ‰‡ ÇŁ
Í?Ǥͤͥ
Í?Ǥͤͥ
ÍžÇ¤ÍœÍĄ
‹‰Š‡•– ǣ
͞Ǥ͜͞
͞Ǥ͜͞
͞Ǥͤ͞
Q
Ž‘…� ƒ–ƒŽ‘‰—‡
D
Í ÍœĎ„ Í˘ÍœĎ„
Q
D
Í&#x;ÍœĎ„ ÍŁÍœĎ„
Q
ÍžÍœĎ„ Í¤ÍœĎ„
‘—–Š ƒ…‹�‰ Surface Ratio Open Space Ratio Enclosure
Q Quality
‘��‡…–‹˜‹–› ‘‰‹… Ǥ Ǥ
Typology 3 Density option
D Density
D
˜‡”ƒ‰‡ ÇŁ
Í?Ǥͼͣ
Í?Ǥͼͣ
͞Ǥͼͼ
‹‰Š‡•– ǣ
͞Ǥ͜͜
͞Ǥ͜͜
Í&#x;Ǥ͞ͼ
B LO C K G E N E R AT I O N Evaluation
‡�ƒ’’‹�‰ ƒ”ƒ�‡–‡”•
Block Generation ‹ƥ‡”‡Â?–‹ƒŽ ‡‹‰Š–‹Â?‰
Fitness Criteria
Q Quality
Genetic Algorithm
‡•– ‡�‡”ƒ–‹‘�
‹�ƒŽ ‡�‡”ƒ–‹‘�
Evaluation
Sky View Factor
”…Š‹–‡…–—”ƒŽ •’‡…–•
Ž‘…� ƒ–ƒŽ‘‰—‡
D Density
Typology 1
Typology 2
Typology 3
8 Blocks
8 Blocks
8 Blocks
Q
D
Q
D
Q
D
Í¤ÍœĎ„
ÍžÍœĎ„
ÍĄÍœĎ„
ÍĄÍœĎ„
ÍžÍœĎ„
Í¤ÍœĎ„
Evaluation 1 Sky View Factor
‘—–Š ƒ…‹�‰ Surface Ratio Open Space Ratio Enclosure
Q Quality
‘��‡…–‹˜‹–› ‘‰‹… Ǥ Ǥ
D Density
Evaluation 2 ”…Š‹–‡…–—”ƒŽ ƒ•’‡…–•
B LO C K G E N E R AT I O N Evaluation - Sky View
ơ space on SVF
Evaluation ͜Ǥͥ͢
Sky View Factor
͜Ǥ͠͡
͜Ǥͣ͢
Ϗ ͜Ǥ͡ ͜Ǥ͠͡ ώ ͜Ǥ͡
ǡ would be eliminated
͜Ǥͥ͝
͜Ǥͤ͜
B LO C K G E N E R AT I O N Evaluation - Architectural aspects
ơ
͝ Elevated network
͞
Evaluation
Sky View Factor
4
͟
B LO C K G E N E R AT I O N Catalogue Large plot
Medium plot
Small plot
͝Ǥͤ͝ Q ͡Ǥͥ͞
͝Ǥ͟͞ Q ͡Ǥͤ͞
͝Ǥͥ͡ Q ͡Ǥͥ͡
͞Ǥͤ͝ Q ͠Ǥͤ͡
͝Ǥ͜͝ Q ͠Ǥͤ͡
͝Ǥ͜͠ Q ͡Ǥͣ͠
͝Ǥ͢͢ Q ͠Ǥͤ͡
͝Ǥͤ͝ Q ͡Ǥͤ͠
͝Ǥͤ͡ Q ͡Ǥ͠͞
͞Ǥ͜͠ Q ͡Ǥ͠͡
͝Ǥ͜͠ Q ͡Ǥͣ͝
͝Ǥ͡͝ Q ͡Ǥͤͥ
͝Ǥͥ͠ Q ͞Ǥͤ͝
͞Ǥͣ͜ Q ͞Ǥͥ͡
͝Ǥͤ͡ Q ͟Ǥ͟͡
͝Ǥͥ͡ Q ͟Ǥ͜͞
͝Ǥͣ͢ Q ͟Ǥ͜͡
͝Ǥͤ͞ Q ͟Ǥͤ͟
͞Ǥ͜͟ Q ͟Ǥ͞͝
͝Ǥͥͤ Q ͞Ǥͣ͜
͝Ǥͥ͜ Q ͟Ǥ͢͞
͞Ǥͣ͟ Q ͟Ǥͥ͢
͝Ǥ͟͠ Q ͟Ǥͥ͡
͝Ǥ͡͝ Q ͠Ǥͣ͝
͟Ǥ͜͝ Q ͝Ǥͤ͝
͟Ǥ͜͟ Q ͝Ǥ͢͝
͞Ǥ͟͞ Q ͝Ǥͥ͟
͞Ǥͥ͞ Q ͝Ǥͥ͜
͝Ǥͣ͢ Q ͞Ǥ͟͠
͝Ǥͤ͞ Q ͞Ǥ͜͟
͞Ǥͣ͠ Q ͝Ǥ͠͞
͟Ǥͤ͜ Q ͝Ǥͥ͞
͞Ǥ͝͞ Q ͞Ǥ͜͢
͞Ǥ͜͝ Q ͝Ǥͥͣ
͞Ǥͣ͜ Q ͞Ǥ͡͞
͝Ǥͤ͞ Q ͞Ǥ͟͜
͝
Q
͞
Q
D
͟
D
CLUSTER LEVEL
C LU S T E R G E N E R AT I O N Cluster Variation
Block Aggregation Design Input Variation of Blocks In Cluster
Large Block
Cluster 1 Q Cluster
Medium Block
Cluster 2 Q
D
Ǥ Ƭ Density Cluster
Small Block
Cluster 3 D Cluster
C LU S T E R G E N E R AT I O N - C A S E S T U D Y Cluster samples
MUMBAI
ȋ Ȍ
1
2
3
4
5
6
ͥ͜ Ǧ ͜͜͝
form of squares
Case Study
ǣ ͞͡͝
BEIJING
Sky View Block-Block Evaluation
1
2
3
4
5
6
ͥ͜ Ǧ ͜͜͝
Ƥ
form of streets
ǣ ͟͜͜
Public space
C LU S T E R G E N E R AT I O N Aggregation
Aggregation type 1
3
ȋ Ȍ
c
c’
2 SVF : 0.75
1
85o Section c - c’
Public space
Aggregation type 2 b
3
b’
Case Study
2 SVF : 0.84
1
Sky View
a’
Block-Block Evaluation
Ƥ
96o Section b - b’
Aggregation type 3 a
3
2 1
SVF : 0.91
121o Section a - a’
C LU S T E R G E N E R AT I O N Aggregation Q Cluster ̼ͤ͜
Q
D Cluster ̼ͣ͜
D Cluster ̼͜͡
Case Study
Sky View Block-Block Evaluation
Ƥ
High porosity High quality residential typology
Low porosity High density residential typology
C LU S T E R G E N E R AT I O N Block Block Relationship
Optimising Block - Block relationship
‡�‡”ƒ–‹‘� ”‰ƒ�‹œƒ–‹‘�
Operation 1
Operation 2
Ž‹’ ‹Â? ÇŚ š‹• Ž‹’ ‹Â? ÇŚ š‹• ‘–ƒ–‡ Í?ͤ͜ Íœ
‘Â?ÇŚ —Â?‹ˆ‘”Â? …ƒŽ‡
Sky View Block-Block ‡Žƒ–‹‘�•Š‹’
Optimising semi public space : Sky view Height v/s Width ratio
Evaluation
�ˆ‘”�ƒŽ ‡†‡•–”‹ƒ� ‡–™‘”�
Â‘Â†Â‹Ć¤Â…ÂƒÂ–Â‹Â‘Â?
�…”‡ƒ•‹�‰ ’–‹�‹•‹�‰ ’ƒ…‡• Ž‡˜ƒ–‡† ‡–™‘”�
C LU S T E R G E N E R AT I O N Operation 1 ’–‹Â?‹•‹Â?‰ Ž‘…Â? ÇŚ Ž‘…Â? ”‡Žƒ–‹‘Â?•Š‹’
Operation 2
Operation 1 Flip in X - Axis Flip in Y - Axis Rotate 180 0
Non uniform Scale
Optimising semi public space : Sky view Height v/s Width ratio
Í? ”‹‰‹Â?ƒŽ
‡�‡”ƒ–‹‘� ”‰ƒ�‹œƒ–‹‘� Sky View Block-Block ‡Žƒ–‹‘�•Š‹’ Evaluation
�ˆ‘”�ƒŽ ‡†‡•–”‹ƒ� ‡–™‘”�
Â‘Â†Â‹Ć¤Â…ÂƒÂ–Â‹Â‘Â?
�…”‡ƒ•‹�‰ ’–‹�‹•‹�‰ ’ƒ…‡• Ž‡˜ƒ–‡† ‡–™‘”�
Íž ‘–ƒ–‡ Í?ͤ͜o
Í&#x; Ž‹’ š‹•
4 Ž‹’ š‹•
C LU S T E R G E N E R AT I O N Operation 2
South Facing Surface
’–‹Â?‹•‹Â?‰ Ž‘…Â? ÇŚ Ž‘…Â? ”‡Žƒ–‹‘Â?•Š‹’
2.5 %
Original
5%
7.5 %
Operation 2
Operation 1 Flip in X - Axis Flip in Y - Axis Rotate 180 0
Non uniform Scale
ÇŁ ͜ǤÍ?ÍĄ
ÇŁ ͜ǤÍ?͢
ÇŁ ͜ǤÍ?ͤ
ÇŁ ͜Ǥ͜͞
Optimising semi public space : Sky view Height v/s Width ratio
Circulation Length
—ƒŽ‹–‹‡• ÂƒĆĄÂ‡Â…Â–Â‡Â† ÇŁ Â?› ‹‡™ ƒ…–‘” Č‹ ČŒ
‡�‡”ƒ–‹‘� ”‰ƒ�‹œƒ–‹‘�
+ 2.5 %
+5%
+ 7.5 %
—ƒŽ‹–‹‡• ”‡nj‘’–‹Â?‹•‡†ǣ ‹”…—Žƒ–‹‘Â? ‡Â?‰–Š Č‹ ČŒ ‘—–Š ƒ…‹Â?‰ —”ˆƒ…‡ Č‹ ČŒ
Sky View Block-Block ‡Žƒ–‹‘�•Š‹’
(Scaling on both sides)
Original
ÇŁ ÍĄÍĄ Â?
ÇŁ ÍĄÍŁ Â?
ÇŁ ÍĄÍĽ Â?
ÇŁ ͢Í? Â?
—ƒŽ‹–‹‡• Â?‘– ÂƒĆĄÂ‡Â…Â–Â‡Â† ÇŁ ’‡Â? ’ƒ…‡ ƒ–‹‘ Č‹ ČŒ
Sky View Factor
Â?…Ž‘•—”‡ ƒ…–‘” Č‹ ČŒ
Evaluation
Ž‘‘” ”‡ƒ ƒ–‹‘ Č‹ Ǥ Ǥ ČŒ
(Scaling on both sides)
Original
- 2.5 %
-5%
- 7.5 %
�ˆ‘”�ƒŽ ’‡†‡•–”‹ƒ� �‡–™‘”�
Â‘Â†Â‹Ć¤Â…ÂƒÂ–Â‹Â‘Â?
�…”‡ƒ•‹�‰ ’–‹�‹•‹�‰ ’ƒ…‡• Ž‡˜ƒ–‡† ‡–™‘”�
ÇŁ ÍœÇ¤ÍĄÍ˘
ÇŁ ÍœÇ¤ÍĄÍ
ÇŁ ÍœÇ¤ÍĄÍž
ÇŁ ÍœÇ¤Í ÍĽ
C LU S T E R G E N E R AT I O N Optimising semi public space Ǧ
Operation 2
Operation 1 Flip in X - Axis Flip in Y - Axis Rotate 180 0
Non uniform Scale
Optimising semi public space : Sky view Height v/s Width ratio
Sky View Block-Block Evaluation
Ƥ Section a - a’
Section b - b’
C LU S T E R G E N E R AT I O N Optimizing Height v/s Width ratio 4
5
Ǧ 3
6 6
Operation 2
Operation 1 Flip in X - Axis Flip in Y - Axis Rotate 180 0
Non uniform Scale
4
3
3
Optimising semi public space : Sky view
͝
4
3 4 4
4 2
4
4 2
5
4
3
4
3
6 6
͞
Height v/s Width ratio
Sky View Block-Block Evaluation
Ƥ
C LU S T E R G E N E R AT I O N Urban Infrastructure
Indiginous Settlement
Design Input
͝
Cluster Plot Distribution
͞ Block Selection Ƥ ơ ͟
Fitness Criteria Sky view Factor
Public Space Quality
Solar Radiation
Solar Radiation
Q Quality
Enclosure
Density Requirement
Enclosure
Cluster Density FAR
D Density
C LU S T E R G E N E R AT I O N Differential Weighting Individuals from block catalogue
Solar Radiation Šƒ†‡† ”‡ƒ Enclosure
Q Quality
‘Â?Â?‡…–‹˜‹–› ‘‰‹… Ǥ Ǥ Č‹ Ž—•–‡” ‡Â?Â•Â‹Â–Â›ČŒ
Q
Quality Options
Cluster 1
›’‘Ž‘‰› Í?
Weighting on Quality
ÍŁÍœĎ„
›’‘Ž‘‰› Íž ‘” ›’‘Ž‘‰› Í&#x; Í&#x;ÍœĎ„
D Q
Density
Ž—•–‡” Í?
‡�‡”ƒ–‹‘�
Individuals from block catalogue
Q
”‰ƒ�‹œƒ–‹‘�
D
Cluster 2
Sky View
Equal Weighting
Block-Block ‡Žƒ–‹‘�•Š‹’
Q
Equally weighted Options
›’‘Ž‘‰› Íž ÍŁÍœĎ„
›’‘Ž‘‰› Í? ‘” ›’‘Ž‘‰› Í&#x; Í&#x;ÍœĎ„
D
Ž—•–‡” ͞
Evaluation
�ˆ‘”�ƒŽ ‡†‡•–”‹ƒ� ‡–™‘”�
Individuals from block catalogue
Â‘Â†Â‹Ć¤Â…ÂƒÂ–Â‹Â‘Â?
Density Options
Cluster 3
›’‘Ž‘‰› Í&#x;
Weighting on Density
�…”‡ƒ•‹�‰ ’–‹�‹•‹�‰ ’ƒ…‡• D
Ž‡˜ƒ–‡† ‡–™‘”�
D
Ž—•–‡” Í&#x;
ÍŁÍœĎ„
›’‘Ž‘‰› Í? ‘” ›’‘Ž‘‰› Íž Í&#x;ÍœĎ„
C L U S T E R L E V E L - E VA L U A T I O N Pedestrian Network
Sky View Block-Block Evaluation
Ƥ
͝
͞
C LU S T E R L E V E L - M O D I F I C AT I O N
Individual Blocks
Aggregation
Cluster
0RGLŹFDWLRQ
Sky View Block-Block Evaluation
Ƥ
Increasing Global F.A.R
Optimising Semi Public Space
Elevated Network
C LU S T E R L E V E L - M O D I F I C AT I O N Increasing Global F.A.R a
a’
Section a - a’
Sky View ̼ ̼͜͝
Block-Block Evaluation
Ƥ
C LU S T E R L E V E L - M O D I F I C AT I O N Optimising Semi Public Space
Shaded Area Extracted from Case Study in Mumbai
͝ ̼
͟͞ τ
͞ ̼
Ƥ
Sky View Block-Block Evaluation
Ƥ
15%
24%
C LU S T E R L E V E L - M O D I F I C AT I O N Elevated Network Semi Public Space
Semi Public Space
y
Semi Public Space
y
y
Sky View ̼ ̼͜͞
Block-Block Evaluation
Ƥ
Ǧ Ǧ
CLUSTER LEVEL Catalogue
Q
Q
D
D
Cluster 1
Cluster 2
Cluster 3
̼ ̼͜͝
̼ ̼͜͝
̼ ̼͜͠
͝Ǥ͞͝
͝Ǥ͡͝
͝Ǥͥ͜
Q
͡Ǥͥ͠
Q
͡Ǥͥ͠
Q
͡Ǥͥ͠
̼ ̼͜͞
̼ ̼͜͟
̼ ̼ͣ͜
͝Ǥͤ͝
͝Ǥ͜͡
͝Ǥͥ͜
Q
͡Ǥͥ͠
Q
͡Ǥͥ͠
Q
͡Ǥͥ͠
̼ ̼͜͟
̼ ̼͜͠
̼ ̼ͤ͜
͝Ǥ͞͝
͝Ǥͤ͠
͝Ǥͥ͢
Q
͡Ǥͥ͠
Q
͡Ǥͥ͠
Q
͡Ǥͥ͠
̼ ̼͜͢
̼ ̼͜͝
̼ ̼͜͝
͝Ǥ͢͝
͝Ǥͥ͠
͞Ǥ͜͝
Q
͡Ǥͥ͠
Q
͡Ǥͥ͠
Q
͡Ǥͥ͠
View of pedestrian street
View of pocket spaces
C O M PA R A T I V E A N A LY S I S
͜͝͡ ͥ͜
Ranwar Village_Mumbai ͞
ͥ͜
Urban Cluster_Mumbai ͞
ǣ ͟͞͞͡͝
ǣ ͣͥ͡͠͝
ǣ ͥ͜
ǣ ͜͝͡
Proposed Design ǣ ͥ͜͝͠͝Ǧ͟͞͞͡͝ ͞ ǣ ͥ͜
C O M PA R A T I V E A N A LY S I S φ͜͞
φ͜͝
φ͜
Cluster 3 Section _ Proposed Design
Ȁ ȋ 2Ȍ
͜͜͝͞ ͤ͜͜ ͜͜͠
͢͝Ǥ͜͜ ͝͞Ǥ͜͜ ͤǤ͜͜ ͠Ǥ͜͜ ͜
Samples
Samples
͝Ǥ͢͜ ͝Ǥ͜͞ ͜Ǥͤ͜ ͜Ǥ͜͠ ͜ Samples
͢͝τ ͝͞τ ͤτ ͠τ ͜ Samples
Sky View Factor Ȁ
Enclosure Value ͞Ǥ͜͜
Ȁ
͢͜͜͝
͜
Ȁ
Shaded Area Proportion ͜͞τ
͜͜͜͞ Ȁ ȋ ͞Ȍ
ȋ Ȁ Ȍ
ȋ Ȁ Ȍ
͝Ǥ͜͜
̼
͜Ǥͤ͜
͝ ͜Ǥ͢͜
͞ ͜Ǥ͜͠
͟ ͜Ǥ͜͞
͜ Samples
C O M PA R A T I V E A N A LY S I S φ͜͞
φ͜͝
φ͜
Cluster 3 Section _ Proposed Design ȋ Ȍ ͟Ǥ͜͡ ͟Ǥ͜͜
Quality Score
͞Ǥ͜͡
͞Ǥ͜͡
͞Ǥ͜͜
͞Ǥ͜͜
͝Ǥ͜͡
͝Ǥ͜͡
͝Ǥ͜͜
͝Ǥ͜͜
͜Ǥ͜͡
͜Ǥ͜͡
͜
͜ Samples
Enclosure Value
ȋ ͞Ȍ
Samples
̼ ͝ ͞ ͟
FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
Pedestrian Network
Vehicular Road
FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
Aerial view