City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 12'

City of Markham, Illinois Adopted on April 2nd, 2014

M A R K H A M

Acknowledgements The Comprehensive Plan was funded through a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) resulting from the impact of Hurricane Ike in September, 2008 Mayor David Webb, Jr.

Adopted by Ordinance #14-0-2089 on April 2nd, 2014

City Council Ernest Blevins Clifton Howard Rondal Jones Donna Barron Bill Barron

Steering Committee

John Thompson, Economic Development Director Tom Summers, Markham Chamber of Commerce Terry Rice, Markham Plan Commission Quintina Brown, Markham Park District Director Deon Barnette, School District 152.5 Xavier Menzies, Markham Public Library Director Erin Aleman, CMAP

Village Staff

John Thompson, Economic Development Director Charles Collins, Economic Development Assistant

Consultant Team Teska Associates, Inc. Team Lead, Planning and Landscape Architecture

Business Districts, Inc. Market Analysis and Economic Development Strategies

Robinson Engineering Transportation Planning

Barron Chisolm Planning Community Engagement

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Table of Contents Section 1. Introduction page 1 Section 2.

Community Profile

page 7

Section 3. Community Vision page 15 Section 4. Housing Analysis page 17 Section 5.

Economic Development and Market

page 27

Section 6. Land Use Analysis page 37 Section 7. Transportation page 47 Section 8.

Community Facilities & Infrastructure Analysis

page 59

Section 9.

Green Infrastructure & Sustainability Plan

page 75

Section 10. Urban Design Analysis page 85 Section 11. Implementation page 95

Section 1 Introduction

Introduction 149 th Street

MIDLOTHIAN

LEGEND

Ro c

k Is

lan

dD

Kedzie Avenue

ist ric tL

ine

City of Markham

43

Cook County

150 th Street

Neighboring Communities Municipal Boundaries D ix ie H

Western Avenue

ig hw ay

HARVEY

154 th Street

157 Street

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

155 th Street

57

th

tric D

istric t

Line

156 th Place

Met ra

Elec

159 th Street

6

159 th Street

CITY OF MARKHAM

163 rd Street

OAK FOREST

Purpose

167 th Street

HAZEL CREST

Center Street

80

Wood Boulevard

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

Dixie Highway

167 th Street

Western Avenue

59

HARVEY

P a rk

Ave

nue

294

Kedzie Parkway

The Comprehensive Plan is a guide to community growth and development. It establishes the City’s vision and direction. It is based on an analysis of existing conditions and community input on desired future growth. It should be used for review of zoning requests, capital improvement planning, and as a guide to more detailed planning. It will be used to guide grant applications, and help the City prioritize future efforts.

It is a guide, providing direction to existing and future Councils and Commissions. However, unlike the City’s zoning and subdivision regulations, the Comprehensive Plan is advisory only – it is not law. It is based on existing conditions and vision in 2014, and should be updated periodically to accurately reflect the City’s vision.

83

POSEN 150 th Street

Crawford Avenue

With a location at the center of I-80, I-57, and I-294, Markham has locational advantage that other communities can only dream of having. The City has also been undergoing a rebirth with several new or renovated civic buildings including City Hall, the Library, Prairie-Hills Junior High and the Roesner Park Field House. Yet many challenges still remain, including expanding the City’s tax base and enhancing community appearance along major roadway corridors like 159th Street, 167th Street, Kedzie Avenue, Crawford Avenue and Dixie Highway. Through the planning process that includes public engagement via social media and in-person interviews and workshops, a vision for the future of Markham was developed grounded in the realities of a changing economy and the unique position and character of Markham.

M etr a

1

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 1.1: Map showing the boundary of Markham and the surrounding communities Source- Teska Associates, Inc.

1

Section 1 Introduction

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Review of Past Plans

spurt between 1950 and 1960 when the City grew by 325% from 2,686 in 1950 to 9,180 in 1960.

• Transportation – I-57 was only a proposed expressway back in the 1960’s. This plan also called for

the extension of Western Avenue between 159th and 167th, although in a different alignment than what is currently proposed.

• Retail– The Canterbury Shopping Center opened in 1960, with 30 stores and 270,000 square feet of space, major tenants included: - Goldblatt Brothers Department Store - Jewel Tea Food Store - National Tea Food Store - S.S. Kresge (variety store) - Walgreens Drug Store - Zayre Discount Store

The City also drafted, but never adopted, a Comprehensive Plan in 2005. In review of the draft plan, the City determined that the document was incomplete and did not adequately address issues facing the City.

2

90

290

CHICAGO

88 294

Lake Michigan

94

mil es

55

mil es

90

57

mil es

55

10

The plan suggested creation of large retention basin’s, one of which was constructed by the MWRD south of 159th Street along the east side of I-294.

• Population – Markham had a population of approximately 14,600 in 1964, with the City’s largest growth

January 14th, 2014

94

290

ILLINOIS INDIANA

15

• Flooding – the 1967 plan notes the community’s relatively flat topography and sporadic flooding problems.

I-294/I-57 Interchange Land Use and Economic Development Plan

20

Studies that include the City of Markham include the ‘I-294/I-57 Land Use and Economic Development Plan’ completed in 2014 (http://29457landuse.com/) and the ‘City of Markham Opportunities Analysis and Brownfields Site Identification and Prioritization Study’ completed in 2004. Recommendations from these studies are included throughout the plan, specifically in the land use, transportation and economic development recommendations. The City of Markham’s last adopted Comprehensive Plan has completed in 1967. As this plan is now 47 years old, it’s only real value is as a historical document of the communities past planning efforts. Interestingly, several challenges noted in that plan remain today, including:

94

5m

iles

294

Study Area 57 355

80 80

“Capitalizing on regional access to spur local job growth and create a welcoming and vibrant front door to the communities of Dixmoor, Harvey, Markham, Midlothian and Posen.“

Figure 1.2: I-294/I-57 Interchange Land Use and Economic Development Plan (2014) Source- Teska Associates, Inc.

Section 1 Introduction

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

www.PlanMarkham.com

Community Engagement Community Engagement is a core element of the planning process and carried out throughout the project. In order to involve community members, a project website and Facebook page were set up for the project. The website provided a link to the on-line survey, information about meetings, the progress of the project and documents for review. In addition, flyers and postcards were also made and distributed in the community to inform residents of the process and encourage them to take the survey.

Figure 1.3: Community engagement snapshots Source- Teska Associates, Inc.

WWW .P LAN M ARKHAM . COM

Markham residents are invited to take the community survey at the website above and participate in Markham’s Comprehensive planning process

Scan this QR code to take the survey today!

Questions? Contact: John Thompson Economic Development Director, Markham

q 708.331.4905 Ext. 337 E jthompson@cityofmarkham.net

Mike Hoffman (Consultant Team Lead) Teska Associates, Inc.

q 815.436.9485 E mhoffman@TeskaAssociates.com

3

Section 1 Introduction

In addition to the on-line based planning efforts, residents and business owners had numerous opportunities to provide input into the plan, including: • A booth was set-up at the annual Markham Festival on August 18th, 2013 to promote the plan and engage residents in a discussion about key community issues. A short, I-Pad based survey was used to ask visitors about their concerns and interests. Key issues identified included a desire for better sidewalks and bike paths, desire for the attraction of new shops and restaurants, and a desire to see the community capitalize on opportunities created by the new connection between I-57 and I-294.

• The draft plan was presented on March 3rd at a Markham Community Block Club meeting. The draft plan was well received, with residents expressing particular interest in economic development opportunities along 159th Street east of I-294.

• Two public meetings were help during the planning process to gain additional community input. These meetings were held at City Hall on January 9th and February 27th, 2014.

• The Markham Planning and Zoning Commission was involved throughout the planning process, from initial meetings in the fall of 2013 to review meetings in January and February, 2014 and the public hearing on March 20th, 2014.

• A Steering Committee also meet regularly to discuss and guide development of the Comprehensive Plan.

This committee was comprised of City staff, representatives of local school, park, and library districts, and representatives of the business community. The committee meet with the consultant team on August 28th, November 3rd, and December 3rd in 2013 and February 25th, 2014.

• The Comprehensive Plan was approved unanimously by the City Council on April 2nd, 2014, Ordinance # 14‑O‑2089

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Figure 1.4: Booth at Markham festival Source- Teska Associates, Inc.

Figure 1.5: Markham Community Block Club Meeting Source- Teska Associates, Inc.

4

Section 1 Introduction

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Survey Summary Public participation is vital to any successful planning process. A community survey was created as part of the comprehensive planning process and made available on-line via the project website. The survey asked questions that would help identify what the respondents like and dislike about the community, existing issues that needed to be addressed, and help identify services, programs and amenities that are needed. Over 450 copies of the survey were printed for distribution at public buildings within the community and at local church events. The survey was also made available on-line in Spanish and 50 printed copies of this survey were given to Markham Park District for distribution. Posters and flyers informing residents about this comprehensive planning process and survey information were posted at prominent locations within the community. Survey responses were collected for a period of 3 months, at the end of which 150 responses were collected for the English survey, but zero responses for the Spanish survey.

The survey was divided into 6 sections with each section focusing on a different theme: Introductory Questions (Section 1), Housing (Section 2), Transportation (Section 3), Parks and Recreation (Section 4), Shopping (Section 5), and Information and Other issues (Section 6). For the 150 responses collected, as Markham has a population of 12,508 (as per the 2010 U. S. Census) for a confidence of 97.5% accuracy, the margin of error is 8%. This means that if 40% of the respondents noted flooding issues, we can assume that between 32% and 48% of the population actually experienced flooding.

Figure 1.6: Snapshot of the survey link!

While residents from all the major areas of City responded to the survey, a majority were from the area south of th 159 Street and between I-57 and I-294. More respondents form this area than the rest of the City noted the need Source- Teska Associates, Inc. for stormwater management improvements. Some of the main reasons respondents choose Markham were the price/value of housing, access to interstates, schools, community character, and proximity to family and friends, while shopping, jobs and access to recreation were lower on the priority list. While somewhat satisfied with the quality of schools, price of housing, safety, community character and variety of retail/shops, improvements to these categories were desired. Better street lighting, public safety and property maintenance were specifically mentioned as issues that need to be addressed.

The housing section of the survey tried to understand how people perceived the housing market and flooding issues within the City. When the results were cross-tabbed, 50% of households with pre-school or school aged children responded that there was insufficient housing for young families like themselves. 60% of households with more than 5 people agreed that the housing for larger families was insufficient. Major flooding included water backing up on the main level, basement flooding and yard flooding, and sudden flooding due to sump pump failures, while minor flooding included roof, window and basement leaks and yard flooding. Damage to flooring and furniture was common to those that experienced flooding. A higher percentage of respondents noted that good schools, daycare, access to neighborhood services, shopping and parks already existed in the community, but there was a need for better sidewalk connections, pedestrian and bicycle access to community facilities, shops and trails, good construction quality and design standards, street lighting, active neighborhood associations, and property maintenance, as well as programs to encourage property maintenance. Need for well-lit streets, specifically in the neighborhood between 159th Street and 163rd Street.

5

Section 1 Introduction

ine istr ict L dD etr aR oc k Is lan M

43

MIDLOTHIAN

Traffic Congestion

150 th Street

HARVEY Di xie Hi gh wa y

Western Avenue

Speeding

154 th Street H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

155 th Street

57

ectri c Dist

rict Lin

e

157th Street

Met

159 th Street

ra El

Whipple Avenue

6

MARKHAM

159 th Street

162 nd Street

163 rd Street

OAK FOREST

294

nue Ave th

167 Street

HAZEL CREST

Center Street

80

Wood Boulevard

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

Dixie Highway

167 th Street

Western Avenue

59

HARVEY

P a rk

California

166 th Street

Plymouth

6

LEGEND

Municipal Boundaries

Kedzie Parkway

Lastly, the section on shopping aimed at understanding respondents shopping and eating-out patterns, which are noted in detail in the survey summary included in the Appendix. Other issues raised were related to improving street lighting, property maintenance and improving community safety.

83

POSEN 150 th Street

Kedzie Avenue

The section on parks and recreation focused on the park district needs of the community. A majority of the respondents agreed with the listed efforts that the Markham Park district should focus on which included access to parks from neighborhoods, park maintenance, trails for walking and biking, access to recreational activities, high quality indoor and recreational facilities and sports fields. This will help the Park District prioritize projects and improve access to its facilities. However, when asked if they use existing facilities, a majority had never or only occasionally used the existing facilities. With respect to park district programs, a majority showed interest in having more programs for all age groups, as well as community events.

149 th Street

Crawford Avenue

The transportation section explored respondent’s use of public transportation, and traffic congestion and speeding issues. It was noted that a majority of the respondents did not use the existing Pace bus routes and Metra service.

Traffic congestion was noted on 159th Street, especially between Pulaski and Kedzie Avenue, along Kedzie avenue north of 159th Street, Dixie Highway between 159th and 167th and along 163rd street. While congestion along most of these roads noted are due to traffic from the interstates accessing the commercial areas along 159th Street and Industrial areas along Dixie Highway, the congestion along 163rd Street is likely due to traffic generated by the Markham Park School. Congestion was also noted on Whipple Avenue due to rush hour traffic, while speeding was noted along residential streets leading to major arterials.

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 1.7: Map showing traffic congestion and speeding issues in Markham as noted in the Community Survey Source- Comprehensive Plan Community Survey comments

Section 2 Community Profile

Community Profile In order to plan for future growth and development in Markham it is important to understand how the community has changed over the years by looking at its demographics, housing and employment patterns.

Population 25,000 20,000

18,000 (Desired Maximum Population)

15,000

With respect to race, Markham is predominantly African American with less than 20% belonging to other races.

The ethnicity of the community is mostly non-Latino.

However, the last decade has seen a slight increase in Latinos (of any race) in the community.

10,000

79%81%

2000

5,000 0

2010 1980 1990 2000 2010

CMAP’s 2040 projection

15,534 13,136 12,620 12,508

+20,000

Figure 2.1: Historic and projected population data for Markham Source- 2010 U.S. Census data

17%

13%

White

African American

0% 0%

1% 1%

0% 0%

2% 3%

American Indian & Alaska Native

Asian

Native Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islander

Some Other Race

Figure 2.2: Historic data on race for Markham Source- 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census data

Hispanic or Latino

20

The population of Markham has declined by around 20% over the last 30 years according to the Census Bureau. However, under reporting has been an issue in Markham, and it is estimated that the City’s actual population is currently closer to 14,000. Census figures suggest that the change over the last decade has been less than 1%, indicating that this decline has stabilized. Based on land use, economic and transportation trends in the region, CMAP projects that Markham’s population will increase to just over 20,000 by 2040 (a 60% increase). This growth would have a significant impact on transportation and infrastructure improvements within the City, annexation of unincorporated land and development of vacant lots and underutilized parcels. During the development of the plan, it was determined that a maximum population of 18,000 would be a more appropriate target population.

Race and Ethnicity

10

20

2

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

00

Not Hispanic or Latino

Figure 2.3: Historic data on race for Markham Source- 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census data

7

Section 2 Community Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Age The age of the residents is important to understand and anticipate the type of housing stock, amenities and services needed in the community. The graph below shows a drop in the age groups of 15 to 24 for each of the Census years, indicating that young adults leave the community to attend institutions of higher education or to pursue work elsewhere. Around 34% of the population is currently less than 20 years in age, for whom access to parks, recreational facilities and programs are important. Access to community amenities and transit for all age groups is also key for a healthy community.

2,000

2000 2010

1,800 1,600 1,400

The median age of the community has also increased from 32.9 to 34.1 over the last decade. This shift in the median age is indicative of an aging population that will demand more services to cater to the increase in empty nesters and seniors over time. The next 30 years will see the predominant workforce of the community (ages 25 to 54) gradually retire and maybe even downsize into lower maintenance properties, in order to allow residents to age in place. The City will need to attract more young adults and families to move back into the larger dwellings by highlighting the availability of good schools and quality of life in Markham. Housing values and availability of a variety of housing types will also be important deciding factors for new residents.

Birth to Pre-K

1,200

7%

Retirees/Seniors

1,000

17% 800

K to 8th Graders 17%

600 400 200

High Schoolers 10%

8

85 years and over

75 to 84 years

65 to 74 years

60 to 64 years

55 to 59 years

45 to 54 years

35 to 44 years

25 to 34 years

20 to 24 years

15 to 19 years

10 to 14 years

5 to 9 years

Under 5 years

0

Working Adults 43%

Figure 2.4: Age distribution of Markham residents for 2000 and 2010

Figure 2.5: Snapshot of Markham’s population in 2010

Source- 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census data

Source- 2010 U.S. Census data

College Students 6%

Section 2 Community Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Employment and Education Trends Currently, Markham’s household size of 3.4 and median age of 34.1 reflect the presence of young families in their highest spending years. More than 50% of persons over the age of 16 in Markham are employed in six industries: professional, educational and healthcare services, and finance, insurance and real estate, transportation, and trade industries while the rest are distributed among other industries. This diverse labor force is supported by jobs available in the region and not just within the City. In fact, as illustrated in the graphic below, the City is a net exporter of jobs. This means that a majority of the residents travel to neighboring communities to work. There are however, a large number of workers that are employed in Markham. The City’s major employers are included in Table 2.2.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining Public administration

Construction Manufacturing Wholesale trade

Other services, except public administration 0%

Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation and food services

4%

5%

3%

5%

8%

3,356

Retail trade

2%

4,052

12%

9%

126 3,356 - Employed in Markham, but live outside 4,052 - Live in Markham, but are employed outside 126 - Employed and live in Markham Figure 2.6: Snapshot of Markham’s employment trend Source- LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics

32%

0%

Transportation and warehousing, and utilities

Information Finance and insurance, and real estate, rental and leasing Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services

8%

Educational services, and health care and social assistance

Figure 2.7: Distribution of jobs in Markham

12%

Source- 2010 U.S. Census data

9

Section 2 Community Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Employment of Private Sector Workers in Markham by Industry Sector, 2011 Transportation and Warehousing

Plomax Transportation

Type

Count

General Freight Trucking, Local

150

Freight Transportation Arrangement

100

Iron and Steel Mills and Ferroally Manufacturing

98

Breweries

90

Kidney Dialysis Centers

86

General Freight Trucking, Local

73

Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores

70

County of Cook

Legal Counsel and Prosecution

60

Heiferman, Inc.

Wood Household Furniture (except Upholstered) Manufacturing

60

County of Cook

Courts

47

County of Cook

Administration of Public Health Programs

45

Plumbing & Heating Equipment & (Hydronics) Merchant Wholesalers

38

Site Preparation Contractors

35

General Freight Trucking, LongDistance, Truckload

31

Elementary and Secondary Schools

30

1,258

38.1%

Polmax LLC

Retail Trade

392

11.9%

Raco Steel Company

Educational Services

352

10.7%

Wholesale Trade

321

9.7%

City Beverage LLC

Construction

154

4.7%

Isd Renal, Inc

Accommodation and Food Services

150

4.5%

Falcon Express Inc.

Other Services (excluding Public Administration)

146

4.4%

Rgs Inc

Health Care and Social Assistance

135

4.1%

Manufacturing

117

3.5%

Real Estate and Rental and Leasing

82

2.5%

Administration & Support, Waste Management and Remediation

65

2.0%

Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

55

1.7%

Management of Companies and Enterprises

32

1.0%

Finance and Insurance

23

0.7%

Information

14

0.4%

Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation

3

0.1%

Utilities

1

0.0%

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting

0

0.0%

Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction

0

0.0%

Total

10

Employer

Auburn Supply Co. Environmental Cleansing Corp Saia Motor Freight Line, LLC Hazel Crest School District 152 1/2

3,300 100.0%

Table 2.1: Employment of Private Sector Workers in Markham by Industry Sector, 2011

Table 2.2: Top Ten Employers in Markham, June 2013

Source- Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics, U.S. Census Bureau

Source- Dun and Bradstreet, Market Insight

Section 2 Community Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Industry Sector

Markham

Cook County

CMAP Region

Health Care and Social Assistance

786

20.3%

279,009

13.8%

436,605

12.7%

Educational Services

442

11.4%

204,733

10.1%

338,389

9.9%

Retail Trade

384

9.9%

200,900

9.9%

360,760

10.5%

Transportation and Warehousing

352

9.1%

92,688

4.6%

148,474

4.3%

Manufacturing

265

6.8%

176,874

8.7%

338,715

9.9%

Accommodation and Food Services

252

6.5%

154,783

7.6%

244,775

7.1%

Administration & Support, Waste Management and Remediation

238

6.1%

147,012

7.3%

239,634

7.0%

Public Administration

197

5.1%

87,601

4.3%

134,679

3.9%

Finance and Insurance

172

4.4%

126,620

6.3%

204,871

6.0%

Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

168

4.3%

161,265

8.0%

270,668

7.9%

Other Services (excluding Public Administration)

141

3.6%

78,114

3.9%

124,729

3.6%

Wholesale Trade

136

3.5%

101,724

5.0%

201,327

5.9%

Information

93

2.4%

49,085

2.4%

80,261

2.3%

Construction

84

2.2%

49,633

2.5%

101,639

3.0%

Real Estate and Rental and Leasing

59

1.5%

33,084

1.6%

50,602

1.5%

Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation

48

1.2%

34,939

1.7%

61,695

1.8%

Management of Companies and Enterprises

32

0.8%

38,369

1.9%

72,789

2.1%

Utilities

22

0.6%

7,354

0.4%

14,208

0.4%

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting

2

0.1%

1,139

0.1%

3,204

0.1%

Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction

2

0.1%

543

0.0%

1,283

0.0%

3,875

100.0%

2,025,469

100.00%

3,429,307

100.0%

Total Employed Population Table 2.3: Employment of Residents by Industry Sector, 2011 Source- Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics, U.S. Census Bureau

11

Section 2 Community Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Journey to work trends in Markham Markham’s current unemployment rate is 10.2% versus 9.5% statewide. Increasing Markham’s current employment base represents both an important opportunity and a key priority for the City. Markham has multiple suitable sites available for commercial and industrial development including sites near 159th Street and Interstate 294.

Development opportunities identified in previous studies include Class A industrial buildings and cargo oriented development emphasizing warehouses and distribution centers. All of these locations and their opportunities have the potential to increase the City’s employment numbers, and secondarily, add additional employers that may generate business-to-business sales tax revenues.

Average and median household incomes and per capita incomes are also generally indicative of households in their family formation years. Only 20% of Markham’s residents have associate or higher degrees, which is lower than the rest of the State. This may be the reason the City has a lower median household income as well.

However, just over 14% of Markham’s households have incomes of $100,000 or greater. About 12% of Markham’s population has a Bachelor’s or an advanced degree. The presence of these higher income and educated residents is a likely factor in Markham’s bifurcated housing market described in the Housing section of this chapter.

Graduate or Professional Degree Bachelor’s Degree Associate’s Degree

Illinois

12%

4%

10% 7% 6%

21%

Some College or No Degree

Less than 9th Grade

8%

12%

6% 6%

Figure 2.8: Educational attainment of Markham’s residents compared to the State Source- 2010 U.S. Census data

12

28% 28%

High School Graduate 9th to 12th Grade, No Diploma

Markham

19%

34%

Understanding where residents work and their means of getting there helps to plan road and transportation improvements, as well as providing adequate services and amenities. The convenient access to I-57, I-294, and I-80 connects residents to a number of different job centers. Based on their mode of commute, approximately 86% of residents drive to work, stressing the importance of well-maintained roads and reducing traffic delays, and most importantly- reducing travel times which have increased in the last decade. The percentage of car poolers also decreased from 11% to 4% between 2000 and 2010. Changes in how and where people work today including working from home and teleconferencing, paired with high gas prices, is changing the way people commute to work with typical increases in car pooling, car sharing and even bike sharing. Currently there are no car or bike share programs in Markham. This is an opportunity for the City to provide residents with a greater variety of transportation choices.

On the other hand, commuters that used public transportation or walked to work increased from 11% to 14% between 2000 and 2010. Based on the adjacent graphic, a number of jobs are clustered within a 1.5mile radius form the City center. Thus, having an efficient public transportation system and well-connected sidewalks will encourage residents to use non-auto (car) modes of transportation to work.

Section 2 Community Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Mean travel time to work (2010) Illinois Markham 28.1 minutes 32.5 minutes

78%

30.9 minutes (2000)

13%

5 - 6 Jobs per square mile 7 - 12 Jobs per square mile 13 - 21 Jobs per square mile 22 - 34 Jobs per square mile 35 - 51 Jobs per square mile

Job Counts by Distance,Direction in 2011 All Workers Share Count 100.0% Total Primary Jobs 3,300 49.2% 1,623 Less than 10 miles 10 to 24 miles 30.4% 1,002 14.3% 471 25 to 50 miles Greater than 50 miles 6.2% 204

4%

Drove alone

Car pooled

Public transit

1%

1%

Walked

Other Means

3%

Worked at home

Figure 2.9: Distribution of jobs in and around Markham

Figure 2.10: Distance to primary jobs for Markham residents (2011)

Figure 2.11: Commuting pattern to work for Markham residents

Source- LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics

Source- LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics

Source- 2010 U.S. Census data

13

Section 2 Community Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

(This page has been intentionally left blank.)

14

Section 3 Community Vision and Policy Formation

3

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Community Vision With its excellent location at the center of 3 major interstate routes, Markham has extraordinary potential. Based on input from the community survey, meetings with the public, the Plan Commission, and the Steering Committee the following overall vision and goals were developed for the City of Markham.

Markham is a progressive, family-oriented community with outstanding access within the Chicago region via I-294, the State via I-57, and the nation via I-80. The community is evolving to meet modern lifestyle and corporate needs with new schools and park facilities and convenient access to fiber optic lines.

Goals People – Markham will constantly strive to be a diverse population (age, race, ethnicity and income). The

City will remain a family-oriented community of primarily single-family homes. While solidly a middle class community and proud of that heritage, Markham will strive to attract young professionals.

Jobs/Business – Markham will attract new, good paying jobs that can take advantage of the community’s excellent location and access. The focus will be on creating a strong industrial/cargo oriented development base between I-294 and Dixie Highway. From a retail perspective, Markham will capitalize on being home to new restaurants, big box retail, and perhaps a new truck stop. When the new I-294/I-57 interchange opens the City will attract new hospitality uses along 159th Street. The City will also work with representatives of the Illinois Nature Conservancy to explore potential tourism opportunities.

Transportation – Markham will capitalize on its excellent regional accessibility and develop a strong nonmotorized transportation system that focuses on pedestrians and bicycles. Western Avenue will be enhanced and extended between 159th Street and 167th Street to provide truck access parallel to I-294 and improved access to property in this future cargo oriented development area (COD).

Community Services – Markham will continue to offer excellent community services including municipal, educational, recreational, and library. The City will strengthen its excellent reputation as a safe community through maintenance and support of local police and fire services.

Location, Location, Location!

Spacious, serene, affordable housing, privacy, abundant wildlife, and acres of virgin prairie land are just a few excellent reasons to live in Markham. The Prairie Capital of the Prairie State Six school districts in the immediate area provide elementary schools. Three districts provide secondary and higher education facilities. There is a multitude of small and large colleges within a 25mile radius of Markham, including South Suburban College (Thornton Township).

Interstate highways: I-57, I-80, Illinois Tristate I-294 and additional highways U.S. 6 and U.S. 54 make Markham a natural hub to transportation, to all points in the nation.

Two large medical hospitals, South Suburban Hospital in Hazel Crest and Ingalls Hospital in Harvey are within a 3 to 5 minute driving time of Markham.

Churches of most denominations serve Markham residents.

Markham, Illinois - The Prairie Capital of the Prairie State 15

Section 3 Community Vision and Policy Formation

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

(This page has been intentionally left blank.)

16

Section 4 Housing Profile

4

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Housing Profile Markham’s foundation as a ‘bedroom’ community continues to be reflected in the community’s interest in strong, single-family residential neighborhoods. A majority of the housing stock is currently single family, with only 1.8% being multi-family units. Recent housing development includes single-family homes and townhomes. Based on the existing household size of 3.4 and the City’s preferred population increase of 18,000, approximately 1,000 to 1,200 additional housing units will be needed. Even if most of the current vacancy of 11.5% is filled, there will still be a need for additional housing units.

97.3%

Housing Profile

Total Households Total Housing Units Occupied Housing Units Vacancy Median HH Income Median earnings-males Median earnings-females

Markham 3,978 4,384 3,978 (90.7%) 406 units (9.3%) $45,244 $41,831 $38,963

(Source- 2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates)

Figure 4.1: Percentage of buildings in Markham by type

Single-family detached

0.9%

1.8%

Single-family attached

Multi-family units

Homeowner vacancy rate Rental vacancy rate Average HH Size Average Owner HH Average Renter HH

Markham 2.2 2.1 3.4 2.88 3.54

Illinois 2.4 7.3 2.62 2.72 2.38

(Source- U.S. Census 2010 Data)

Source- 2010 U.S. Census data

A large percentage of the housing stock was constructed prior to 1980 and is now over 30 years old. This indicates that many homes will start requiring maintenance and replacement of roofs, heating and cooling equipment, as well as window upgrades. Major improvements to the buildings via the permit process will be an opportunity for the City and residents to bring such buildings up to current energy, fire and building codes. Ensuring that the City has good schools, sound infrastructure, access to parks and trails, a well-defined community character, and compliant with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) standards are all key to making Markham a sought after community to live and work in. Also, a community that has a diverse housing stock is more sustainable in the long term as it is able to maintain a range of services and facilities useful to all age groups.

To fully understand the housing needs of Markham, the existing housing stock is analyzed on the following pages with respect to - affordability, sale prices, foreclosures, housing fit and household types, that help further define the housing needs of the City.

Figure 4.2: Percentage of buildings in Markham by age Source- 2010 U.S. Census data

17

Section 4 Housing Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Affordability

Sale Price

Foreclosures

Like many communities in the region, the number of households in Markham paying more than 30 percent of their income on housing (including utilities, insurance and taxes) and considered ‘cost burdened’ has increased over the past decade. In fact, the number of cost-burdened homeowners increased from 31% in 2000 to 56% in 2010. The number of rent-burdened households increased from 52% to 76% during the same period. The increasing number of cost-burdened owners and renters has outpaced those in Cook County. As of 2010, the County has 15% fewer cost burdened households and 30% fewer rent burdened households.

Single-family home sales prices within the last six (6) months indicate a widely disparate local market. During this period, 99 homes in Markham were sold. Of these 99 home sales, 63 were sold for $50,000 or less, or at $35-$40 per square foot.

Recently constructed homes in Markham’s strongest residential neighborhoods have sold for $160,000$190,000 in this same period. These wide fluctuations in sales prices indicate continued market stress and exacerbate negative perceptions about Markham and its housing quality. Markham’s residential rental market has also been affected by foreclosures.

Virtually all rental units currently available in Markham are single-family homes. Available multi-family rental housing units are primarily located in neighboring communities. Markham has just over 4,000 occupied housing units with nearly 29% indicated as renter occupied for 2013. Compared with 2011 data, rental occupancy has increased from 24% to 28.8%. This change translates into a 20% increase in the overall number of rental units throughout the community.

This change has important implications for how the City addresses regulatory enforcement in the shortterm, and how it enables successful owner-occupied residential development in the future.

The recent economic downturn significantly affected housing prices and resulted in multiple foreclosures in Markham and elsewhere in the south suburbs.

Markham’s average home sale price for 2013 varies from $40,000 to $51,192, depending upon the real estate source (Sources: trulia.com, realtor.com, and zillow.com).

Since 2008, sales prices have declined by 61.6%.

Foreclosure numbers again differ by source, but all sources estimate the current number in some state of foreclosure process at about 300 units. While the overall percentage of foreclosed units in Markham is higher than County, State and National levels, the number of foreclosures has had a downward trend between 2012 and 2013.

Figure 4.3: Housing cost and rent burdens Source- Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3) - Sample Data & DP04 2006-2010 American Community Survey Selected Population Tables

Figure 4.4: Foreclosure activity in Markham Source- www.realtytrac.com

Figure 4.5: Total monthly foreclosures in Markham Source- www.realtytrac.com

18

Section 4 Housing Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Pattern of household types in Markham

Households of different sizes require different kinds of housing. Assessing the distribution of housing by number of bedrooms provides information about the supply and demand in Markham’s housing market. If the housing stock is dominated by larger dwellings, as is the case in Markham, then smaller households may be forced into unnecessarily large homes.

In addition, the household size of renters is higher than home owners, indicating that more families are renting as opposed to owning. Based on data from the American Community Survey, a high percentage of this demographic is represented by single parent households (i.e. male or female householder) with a much higher percentage occupied by female householders. The City should focus on maintaining a variety of housing types and price ranges to accommodate these households most likely dependent on a single source of income.

The unit size-household mismatch is evident with roughly 60% of all households consisting of 1-3 people and only 10% of housing units having 2-bedrooms or less. While a smaller household can certainly live in a larger space, this can have affordability implications if smaller households are paying for more living space than needed.

Figure 4.6: Number of Households Versus Number of Housing Units, Markham (2010) Source- Bedroom Count Source: SELECTED HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates; DP04 & Household Size Count: OCCUPANCY CHARACTERISTICS 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Renter occupied households

For this study, “small” homes are those with 0 – 2 bedrooms and “large” homes have 3+ bedrooms.

Likewise, 1-3 person households are considered “small” and 4+ person households are considered “large.

Household Size

Markham

Illinois

Married-couple

3.4

3.3

Male householder, no wife

4.6

3.4

Female householder, no husband

3.5

3.4

Non-family household

1.2

1.2

Owner occupied households

Housing fit by size

Figure 4.8: Tenure by household type in Markham Source- 2007 - 2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Figure 4.7: Tenure by household type for owners versus renters Source- 2007 - 2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

19

Section 4 Housing Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Existing neighborhoods in Markham

83

149 th Street th

Dis tric tL

ine

PRAIRIE 150 Street CROSSING k Is lan d Ro c

M

etr a

43

150 th Street

154 th Street

BELAIRE

156 th Place

Line

PUMP HOUSE

ic Dis trict

157th Street

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

155 th Street

57

Met

ra El

ectr

CAVANAUGH

159 th Street

6

CORAL CABLES WEST MARKHAM

159 th Street

OLD MARKHAM

CANTERBURY

163 rd Street

MARKHAM MANOR

167 th Street

Center Street

Wood Boulevard

Source- Teska Associates, inc.

Dixie Highway

80

Western Avenue

167 th Street

Kedzie Parkway

59

P a rk

Ave

nue

294

Figure 4.9: Residential neighborhoods in Markham

20

ig hw ay

COUNTRY AIRE

D ix ie H

Western Avenue

Crawford Avenue

The housing plan that follows, helps address these issues and plan for the housing needs of current and future residents of the City.

Kedzie Avenue

The residential neighborhoods in Markham are spread out throughout the community as shown on the adjacent map. Besides the demographic and housing related issues, there are a number of physical issues which contribute to the overall character of the neighborhood and affect the quality of life of the residents. Based on the community survey, feedback and Comprehensive Plan Workshops, the following key issues were identified: • Missing sidewalks • Insufficient street lighting • Flooding in basements and yards, especially in the West Markham neighborhood • Property maintenance issues (buildings and yards) • Lack of neighborhood groups/associations • Lack of sustainability programs to help implement energy and water efficiency

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Section 4 Housing Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Housing Plan This section suggests creative and incremental strategies to serve the existing population, combined with necessary redevelopment opportunities to help bring growth and maintain the existing residential character of the City of Markham.

Housing Vision

Housing Goals and Policies

The City of Markham will ensure quality homes and cohesive neighborhoods that empower its citizens.

Coordinated city services and programs emphasize quality homes, home ownership, residential safety, and appropriate property maintenance. The City fosters the creation and enhancement of cohesive neighborhoods through infill and rehabilitation projects.

New development is located at strategic locations that capture local amenities and complement land values.

Empowered citizens work with the city to protect neighborhood stability, residential compatibility and an increased sense of community identity and pride.

The goals and policies presented in this section were developed by community members as well as public officials. The Goals for Housing are organized into 5 main areas:

Housing Quality New Housing Development

Affordable Housing

Cohesive Neighborhoods

Housing Planning and Coordination

21

Section 4 Housing Profile

s Housing Quality

s New Housing Development

Part of Markham’s charm is its older housing stock which was built before 1950. In general, homes in Markham are in good condition and contribute to the character and sense of stability in the community. However, a number of these homes have and will reach the end of their useful lives if not rehabilitated soon. While the City’s Housing Rehabilitation Program has made good strides in helping lower income residents upgrade their houses, it is not likely to have the financial capability to assist all home owners who need help. New strategies will be needed to turn the tide of housing deterioration into opportunities for revitalization of Markham.

Most of Markham’s housing stock was developed to meet the needs of households in days gone by. Today’s housing needs are often very different based on the household size and type. Encouraging the development of new housing within already developed areas presents a special challenge that requires strategic policies.

Preserve and enhance Markham’s quality housing stock • Promote private and public efforts to preserve the existing quality housing stock by maintaining sound units, rehabilitating substandard units, and replacing severely deteriorated units.

-- Promote maintenance of housing that is now in standard condition to prevent its deterioration to substandard condition.

-- Promote the rehabilitation of substandard structures when the cost of rehabilitation is less than the cost of replacement housing.

-- Promote replacement of substandard structures which have excessive rehabilitation costs with new structures.

• Promote private and public efforts to provide adequate capital for private and public rehabilitation housing projects at competitive or favorable costs.

-- Facilitate rehabilitation of rental housing to improve the condition of the rental housing stock.

-- Facilitate rehabilitation of owner occupied housing based on the creditworthiness of the dwelling rather than the creditworthiness of the homeowner.

• Promote efforts to identify, rehabilitate and preserve homes having historical/architectural significance.

-- Give priority to such homes in City rehabilitation programs.

Ensure that all housing is safe, sanitary and in good condition • Promote private commitments to improvement of the housing stock by using public resources to remove or abate blighting influences within or near residential areas.

-- Provide effective operation and maintenance of public services and facilities.

-- Demolish and/or redevelop deteriorated commercial structures.

-- Give priority to those which contribute to the blight of residential areas.

-- Promote financial assistance for essential repairs to substandard structures that provide housing for low and moderate income persons. Support private sector low-interest loan programs for such repairs, combined with public resources when available.

-- Require building/unit inspections before renters move in to protect them from living in sub-par units and to keep owners accountable for the properties they own in the community.

22

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Provide a variety of housing types and densities to meet the changing needs of Markham residents • Promote private and public efforts to provide adequate capital

• • • • •

for private and public new housing projects at competitive or favorable costs -- Support a Letter of Credit program to expedite housing project start-ups.

Support the private sector’s efforts to meet changing housing demands and special housing needs.

Stimulate the production of new housing for all incomes, ages and family types.

Promote housing opportunities that respond to the special needs of students, young adults, veterans, households headed by females, the elderly, and the handicapped.

Encourage programs which allow seniors to remain in their homes as long as possible (e.g. home maintenance and repair, home health care, reverse mortgage programs, meal programs).

Encourage home ownership and offer/partner with groups that can conduct homeownership education programs.

Section 4 Housing Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

s Affordable Housing

s Cohesive Neighborhoods

The City recognizes that subsidized housing and other creative housing programs can empower residents with housing choices and assist in the role of community maintenance and enhancement.

Over the past decade, many single family homes in Markham have become rental units. This has resulted in some concerns related to property maintenance and decline in participation in neighborhood associations and block clubs. The City wishes to encourage conversion of rental units to owner-occupied homes to help strengthen existing neighborhoods. Cohesive neighborhoods provide the desired setting for quality homes, not merely shelter for City residents. Social interaction and neighborhood identity, partially a result of a neighborhood’s design and planning process encourages desired stability for increased homeownership levels.

Promote access to quality, affordable homes for all Markham residents, regardless of their economic capabilities or special needs • Work with Cook County on affordable housing programs that

are eligible for CDBG funding, particularly in the West Markham, Canterbury, and Markham Manor neighborhoods.

• Provide opportunities within existing neighborhoods for below market

rate and affordable housing without negatively impacting the existing neighborhood character.

-- Promote residential infill development of vacant or underdeveloped parcels at somewhat higher densities than surrounding properties, with assurances that neighborhood compatibility will be maintained through appropriate zoning and related techniques (e.g. development standards and architectural controls). This technique would be particularly appropriate in the area north of 159th Street and east of Kedzie behind the businesses that front on these major roadways and near Gensburg-Markham Prairie.

-- When providing for below market-rate housing, give priority to households with children, elderly, or special needs present within privately owned developments containing a mix of market-rate and below market rate units; or, if entirely public-subsidized housing, priority will go to projects with single family scale buildings -- Stimulate the production of new housing for all incomes, ages, and family types, including mid and upper incomes

• Increase the cost efficiency of providing utilities and services to residential areas through increased densities.

-- Reduce costs for housing developments and enable easier maintenance of prescribed levels of service through appropriate densities -- Promote increased housing densities to provide a broader customer base for public services, including utilities

Build strong, cohesive neighborhoods with a majority of Markham’s households owning the homes they live in • Increase opportunities for home ownership within the City of Markham.

-- Promote and investigate City policies, including taxation and incentives for multifamily units, to ensure that the City is not encouraging rental units • Encourage affordable residential developments in places where development has been overlooked.

Promote safe, attractive, livable neighborhoods that will attract homeowners • Maintain a strong police presence within all neighborhoods and explore community policing strategies

• Maintain a leadership attitude which delivers responsive public actions in ensuring personal security, code enforcement, and other public services Maintain a strong code enforcement program Establish programs to protect personal security Maintain effective crisis response Improve neighborhood/police relations Develop effective neighborhood crime defense mechanisms • Improve the visual quality of residential areas where needed.

-- Accent views to parks and open space in the design of new residential areas -- Ensure that all residential roadways are upgraded to modern standards, with appropriate pavement, sidewalks, and curbs and gutter.

------

Promote social interaction as well as neighborhood identity and initiatives • Encourage walk-ability within neighborhoods through completion of sidewalks 23

Section 4 Housing Profile

s Housing Planning and Coordination It is critical to maximize the effectiveness of scarce public resources in improving housing opportunities in Markham and throughout the county.

Ensure coordinated, effective planning and management of housing programs and development issues • Eliminate unnecessary regulatory impediments to the development of affordable and special needs housing, consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.

• Improve certainty in development regulations to the extent they are consistent with the public health, •

• • • • •

24

safety, and welfare.

Promote intergovernmental cooperation to achieve City Housing Goals -- Seek to enter into an intergovernmental agreement with Cook County to foster implementation of affordable housing goals -- Seek cooperative relationships with other agencies like SSMMA to encourage the development of affordable housing within the communities Maintain funding streams for housing programs and strategies.

Work with Cook County, SSMMA and others to promote opportunities for residents to age in place.

Partner with regional agencies and neighboring communities to offer programs that offer educational programs that encourage home ownership, addressing issues of financing, insurance, taxes, and property maintenance.

Partner with the Cook County and SSMMA land bank programs to acquire and restore to productive use homes that have gone into foreclosure.

Work with banks and lenders to ensure that foreclosed properties are maintained, inspected, and ready for occupancy.

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Section 4 Housing Profile

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Implementation Strategies B Coordination Strategy 1 Involve all appropriate City departments and programs in the

housing planning process to ensure a coordinated planning and implementation effort.

B Addressing Blight/Foreclosure Strategy 2 Partner with the Housing Authority of Cook County (HACC), Cook County Bureau of Economic Development, Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP), South Suburban Mayors’ and Managers’ Association (SSMMA), and the Cook County and/or SSMMA’s Land Bank programs to evaluate options available to deal with and prevent blighted and foreclosure properties

B Maintain the Integrity of Single Family Neighborhoods Strategy 3 Develop policies to limit rezoning and special use permits for

conversion of single family homes. Such policies should contain criteria regarding the locations and neighborhoods and building conditions that warrant permission of conversion.

Strategy 4 Train Village staff to be vigilant in the approval of kitchen and bath additions that might lead to apartment conversions and to obtain affidavits from homeowners making such additions as to their intentions.

Strategy 5 Support local neighborhood associations and block clubs by

participating in meetings and providing information regarding building permit and property maintenance requirements, available housing resources, crime and fire prevention, and other relevant topics.

B Multi-Family Housing Strategy 6 Implement a rental housing registration and/or inspection

program to ensure compliance with Building Codes and promote safe, decent and sanitary housing.

B Diversify Housing Stock Strategy 7 Develop a zoning approach to require, permit and/or create incentives for the development of new residential neighborhoods that contain a mix of housing types.

B Ensure Quality Development Strategy 8 Include in the Village’s codes and manuals design provisions and performance standards improvements in the design quality of all residential development. Such provisions and standards may address: • Building setback and orientation standards that enhance social interaction.

• Street system design that promotes connectivity and addresses traffic calming measures to reduce speeding.

• Requirements for sidewalks and trails that facilitate and encourage walking and bicycle use.

• Streetscape planting requirements.

• Standards for the placement of parking areas and garages to avoid streetscapes dominated by parking lots and garage doors.

Strategy 9 Require, permit and/or provide incentives for “open space” or “cluster” development to preserve green space within new subdivisions.

25

Section 4 Housing Profile

B Flooding and Sustainability Strategy 10 Continue to work closely with MWRD and residents of the

West Markham, Coral Cable, and Old Markham Neighborhoods on planned storm water projects. The City should take an active role to educate residents about planned improvements and work in cooperation with MWRD for any access easements or right-of-way acquisition required to improve local flooding issues.

Strategy 11 Promote the use of rain gardens, rain barrels, and other techniques to reduce and reuse storm water within neighborhoods.

Strategy 12 Integrate bioswales and other sustainability measures noted in Section 9 within new public improvements within existing neighborhoods.

Strategy 13 Work with land banks (Cook County and SSMMA) to acquire foreclosed homes within flood prone areas for conversion to parks and open space.

26

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Section 5 Economic Development and Market Analysis

Economic Development and Market Analysis In examining the City of Markham from an economic perspective, four fundamental market factors will affect Markham’s future. These factors include both 94 290 90 opportunities and challenges, and each factor will need to be addressed strategically to ensure Markham’s future success.

1. Markham’s location has always been and will remain the community’s ultimate competitive advantage. In addition to its proximity to three of the Chicago area’s major interstate highways, the City’s major commercial 88 corridors represent tangible opportunities for additional retail and employment growth.

290

CHICAGO

294

Lake Michigan

94

2. The City’s multiple residential neighborhoods will need to be strengthened, and housing stock should be monitored and improved. Residential home values in Markham have declined substantially as a result of the recent economic downturn. Significant numbers of Markham’s single-family homes are now rental properties, despite the City’s preference 55 for owner occupied, single-family homes. mil es

55

90

ILLINOIS INDIANA

15

mil

es

20

5. Future development in the 159th Street corridor east of I-294 will need to pay special attention to the storm water management challenges in this area. Much of this area is within a 500 year flood plain, and a small portion of the area is within the 100 year flood plain. Careful coordination with the Army Corps of Engineers and MWRD will be critical. As illustrated on page 59, the MWRD has developed a regional plan to address existing flooding in this area through creation of a new storm water basin along the east side of I-294.

es

iles 5m

4. The City remains interested in a possible hotel and related hospitality businesses within its boundaries. Markham’s location advantage is obvious, given traffic volumes and access. Employment growth, increasing resident numbers, and greater visitor amenities can be developed into 355demand generators to support future hospitality sector growth.

94

294

mil

3. Markham’s open space, including the Indian Boundary Prairies, can serve to support additional regional amenities that expand the local economy by attracting new businesses and residents.

57

10

5

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

57

Markham 80

80

Figure 5.1: Location map of Markham Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

27

Section 5 Economic Development and Market Analysis

Markham’s demographics and its primary retail markets are displayed in Table 5.1. The center point for the radii and drive time markets is 159th Street and Kedzie Avenue.

These retail markets are defined as: • Community Affiliated, or Local, Market: Successful retail centers, regardless of size or mix, often define the character of a community.

Whether a neighborhood center like Canterbury or a neighborhood business cluster along Wood Street, these areas naturally attract local residents. The resulting relationship between residents and those businesses located in these commercial areas create a bond that makes residents an important market to that retail area. Identifying with their community, residents often bring guests to patronize these same businesses.

• Pedestrian or 1 Mile Market: Residents living within one-mile of any retail area are usually active users and can walk to that area. Their frequent trips, due to the nearby location, add vitality even when businesses are not open.

Consequently, this market is more important to the success of retail centers than its spending power often suggests.

• 3 Mile or Traditional Developer Market: The demographics for this 3-mile market have been traditionally used by the retail development community as an important indicator of a suitable trade area, particularly for regional and national 28

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Markham 12,600 4,013 3.1 2,303.86

1 Mile 7,662 2,449 3.1 1,968.55

3 Miles 96,633 32,527 3.0 3,263.17

5 Minutes 16,683 5,401 3.1 2,491.53

15 Minutes 455,455 165,676 2.7 3,112.17

Race and Ethnicity Asian Black White Other

0.70% 78.90% 14.70% 5.50%

1.00% 72.10% 20.10% 6.40%

1.30% 54.00% 34.10% 10.30%

0.70% 70.90% 20.90% 7.10%

1.30% 48.20% 42.80% 7.30%

Hispanic Ethnicity Not of Hispanic Ethnicity

7.20% 92.70%

9.40% 90.50%

16.90% 83.00%

11.70% 88.20%

12.20% 87.70%

Total Population Total Households Household Size Population Density (per Square Mile) Median Age 34.8 34.5 34.5 34.6 37.7 Employees 3,779 2,015 31,434 6,641 168,360 Bachelor's Degree or Higher 11.9% 13.4% 16.0% 14.1% 23.0% Average Household Income $59,939 $63,649 $61,744 $60,098 $70,653 Median Household Income $45,469 $49,798 $50,565 $47,308 $56,477 Per Capita Income $19,103 $20,365 $20,905 $19,577 $25,834 % Households with Incomes 14.3% 16.3% 14.8% 13.9% 19.9% $100,000+ Estimated Consumer $72,986,839 $48,782,121 $657,891,102 $102,204,203 $3,742,753,381 Expenditures

Tables 5.1: Retail Markets Source- 2013, by Experian, 2013 Alteryx, Inc. Irvine, CA

Section 5 Economic Development and Market Analysis

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

chain stores and restaurants. As these chains increasingly use data analytics to precisely target new and existing customers, the importance of these demographic market characteristics will likely diminish.

• Convenience or 5-Minute Drive Time Market (also a 10-Minute Bicycle Ride): If a consumer can drive to obtain a needed item within five-minutes, that location becomes the routine choice to meet every day needs, assuming an available variety of quality goods. Convenience shoppers represent the core market for most retail clusters. This five-minute drive time market represents a ten-minute bike ride by local residents to that retail area.

• Destination or 15 Minute Drive Time: The businesses with a smaller percentage of their total sales from the convenience market create a destination draw for retail locales because their unique offering attracts shoppers and diners from a larger geography or trade area. Customers from this destination trade area add sales to adjacent businesses. The stores attracting this market also give that retail center a unique character that distinguishes it from other shopping options.

The size of Markham’s destination market, with over 450,000 in population and in excess of $3.7 billion in estimated consumer expenditures, is a function of the City’s access to major highways. Overall, Markham’s markets increase in racial and ethnic diversity as the geographies expand. Incomes and education attainment are generally consistent among all markets with the exception of the higher incomes and education levels noted in the destination market. The Traditional Developer or 3 mile Market is generally strong in population with an adequate daytime population or employee number. Markham’s Convenience and Pedestrian Markets have smaller population and employee numbers. Consequently, successful retailers or restaurants locating within those trade areas will need to attract customers from a broader area. This City’s commitment to expanding Markham’s employment base will aid in retail retention and attraction.

For Markham, the community’s core retail area is 159th Street between Interstates 294 and 57. This corridor has both access and visibility to vehicular traffic. According to Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts for 159th Street are 25,600 closer to Interstate 294 and 26,800 near Interstate 57. IDOT, in its studies for the new I-294/I-57 Interchange, estimates that the ADT on 159th Street will increase by 7,080 vehicles. This 159th Street corridor and Markham’s other high traffic corridors will continue to generate interest among site selectors for highway-oriented retailers and restaurants.

Within this core area of 159th Street, Canterbury Shopping Center is the anchor. Continuous physical improvements and strong tenant recruitment will remain critical to both Canterbury’s and Markham’s future retail success. Canterbury’s gross leasable area is published as 266,355 square feet. (Source: LoopNet.) This center fits the International Council of Shopping Centers’ classification as a community or large

Understanding the Numbers

When reviewing demographic information, it is always important to understand the source of the information. In this Economic Development Section, the plan references the Experian data set, which is provided by a private company that takes census data and applies mathematical algorithms to project changes in demographics.

This source is commonly used in the real estate industry. In the Community Profile and Housing sections, the plan references either U.S. Census or the American Community Survey. Both are government sources, with the Census considered the more definitive since it is based on a survey of every household in the nation.

The American Community Survey uses sampling and mathematical models to project estimated demographic data. So in the case of Markham, the American Community Survey projects an average household size of 3.4 in 2011, where Experian projects a size of 3.1. In either case, the value is significantly higher than the State average of 2.62. Median household income estimates also very slightly, with the American Community Survey estimating $45, 244 in 2011 and Experian projecting $45,469 in 2013. The latter difference in income could easily be explained by inflation from 2011 to 2013.

29

Section 5 Economic Development and Market Analysis

neighborhood center, given its leasable area and tenant mix. This center category typically attracts customers from a 3-5 mile trade area. Canterbury’s asking rents are currently at $18-$19 per square foot, with real estate taxes and common area maintenance at $7.50 per square foot. This $7.50 add-on to any Canterbury tenant’s net rent is primarily comprised of real estate taxes. For center owners, this tax obligation presents three intertwined challenges. The rent negotiated with a tenant on a per square foot basis must be lower to accommodate and attract a quality tenant. These lower rent rates reduce the income generated by the commercial property, limiting the owner’s capacity to reinvest in property improvements.

Consequently, both market realities ensure that incentives or partnerships with the City will be needed for ongoing business attraction and retention. This includes programs, such as Cook County’s Class 6B property tax incentive for building and expanding commercial facilities. Markham’s sales tax data for the last three years is shown in Table 5.2 As with most suburban Chicago communities, Markham’s overall sales tax revenues declined during the economic downturn and have improved since 2010. Sales tax generated by the Automotive and Filling Station category has increased by nearly $100,000 during this 5-year period, despite a drop in 2009. During the same time frame, retail sales tax has declined by 17.6%. (The Illinois sales tax categories identified as Retail above include General Merchandise, Food, Drinking and Eating Places, Furniture and Household, Lumber and Hardware, and Drugs and Miscellaneous.) The remaining other tax includes sales tax by the State’s Agriculture and Others, and Manufacturing categories. Most of the sales tax generated within these two categories are typically business-to-business sales. Variations can result from several factors, including how sales are categorized as paid to the state, certain exemptions or changes with the customer bases of the individual businesses submitting sales tax.

30

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

2012 2011 2010 2009 2008

Retail $454,695 $501,161 $502,947 $521,098 $551,757

Other $248,289 $220,332 $139,768 $152,892 $378,643

Tables 5.2: Municipal Sales Tax Data Source- 2013, by Experian, 2013 Alteryx, Inc. Irvine, CA

Automotive $257,033 $237,330 $183,622 $146,397 $159,363

Total $960,017 $958,824 $826,338 $820,387 $1,089,762

Section 5 Economic Development and Market Analysis

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Economic Development Plan Overview

I-294/I-57 Interchange Land Usetheme and Economic Development Plan Markham’s future will be based 2. Backgroundupon Data Reviewthe City’s ability to capitalize on its superior Throughout this Comprehensive Plan process, the overarching is that location. Markham has extensive highway connections, and its proximity to the new interchange between Interstates 294 and 57 is just one example. 159th Street, City of Markham Opportunities Analysis and Brownfields Site Identification and Prioritization with its access to both Interstates, retail and restaurants at the Canterbury Shopping Center, and industrial firms and sites, is the City’s most prominent corridor.

The City of Markham completed an above noted study in 2004. Key highlights 2. Markham – This COD opportunity is comprised of 174 acres located on the south side of 159th Street just east of I-294. The property was originally of the plan included: platted for single-family residentialas use, but was only partially developed.

Other corridors include important regional and local institutions, such the Cook County•• Courthouse ondevelopment Kedzie Avenue and Markham’s Public Library on 167th Opportunity for a quality hotel The Village has acquired a significant portion of the property within this Enhancements to Canterbury Shopping Center Like the Dixmoor/Harvey site, a portion of this site will require some Major regional office opportunities once the 294/57 interchange is Street. Each of the areas will allow the City to expand itssite. diversity of uses (retail, restaurant, •commercial and industrial, recreation, and hospitality) over the longterm. environmental remediation – in this case due to illegal dumping. The completed plan calls for retail/commercial use along the 159th Street frontage, with industrial/warehouse type of uses to the south and preservation and enhancement of the existing, more established portion of the existing single-family area west of Western Avenue.

The priorities described below incorporate the results of two recent studies:

• Creation of a Prairie Land Visitor Center • Creation of a Skilled Building Trade Park along Crawford Avenue and 167th Street (just outside the 294/57 Study Area)

• Additional industrial infill development along Dixie Highway, south of 159th

• The I-294/I-57 Interchange Land Use and Economic Development Plan (2014). This study considers the development possibilities for Markham and the four other communities proximate to the interchange.

• The South Suburban TOD/COD Study (2013) conducted by Solomon Cordwell Buenz for SSMMA. As noted, this study examined a 174acre site in Markham. This site has important COD potential, in addition to a small retail/ commercial component along 159th Street.

Given shifts in the economy since completion of this study, opportunities for major office development and quality hotels seem limited today (see market analysis on Page 22). However, other recommendations – particularly enhancements to the Canterbury Shopping Center and additional visitor amenities to capitalize on local prairie resources remain appropriate suggestions.

149 th Street

CHICAGO

294

Lake Michigan

94

s

20

mile

s

55

ILLINOIS INDIANA

15

mile

90

57

10

mile

s

55

94

5m

iles

294

Study Area 57 80

355

80

“Capitalizing on regional access to spur local job growth and create a welcoming and vibrant front door to the communities of Dixmoor, Harvey, Markham, Midlothian and Posen.“

ine ist ric tL dD lan k Is Ro c etr a M

MIDLOTHIAN

150 th Street

D ix ie H

ig hw ay

Western Avenue

Page | 17 HARVEY

154 th Street H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

155 th Street

City of Markham

156 th Place

ic Dis trict

Line

57

157th Street

Met ra El ectr

159 th Street

1

2. 159th Street from Kedzie Avenue west to I-57.

2

6

3

159 th Street

4

MARKHAM 163 rd Street

OAK FOREST

4. South of 159 Street and east of I-294. th

nue

294

Ave

Figure 5.2: Location of economic development opportunities 167 th Street

th

Center Street

HAZEL CREST

Dixie Highway

Western Avenue

80

Kedzie Parkway

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

Wood Boulevard

167 Street 59 inc.

Prepared by- Teska Associates,

HARVEY

P a rk

3. Canterbury Shopping Center and the nearby park and nature preserve.

Kedzie Avenue

43

Crawford Avenue

1. Triangular area with multiple sites south of 159 Street, east of Pulaski Road, and west of I-57.

th

90

290

83

POSEN

January 14th, 2014

94

290

88

150 th Street

Figure 16: Markham Site From SSMMA COD Study – Looking Southwest from 159th and Dixie Highway

Applying the Plan data and past reviews, Markham’s best opportunities for initial economic impact are located along the 159th Street corridor. The inherent competitive advantages noted above make 159th Street the City’s economic driver. Four separate areas along 159th Street comprise priority locales for economic development activity:

I-294/I-57 Interchange Land Use and Economic Development Plan

H AZEL C REST

31

Section 5 Economic Development and Market Analysis

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

In all areas, it will be critical that any new development provide appropriate stormwater management solutions complying with new MWRD regulations. In some areas, particularly in Area 1 east of I-294, flooding mitigation tools and techniques should be integrated into site planning efforts.

1 159

th

3

Street from Kedzie Avenue west to I-57

This segment of 159 Street includes multiple, diverse businesses, many automotive-related. The western portion of the segment includes dilapidated and vacant residential properties. Initiatives to improve the physical appearance of this corridor segment and the quality of its businesses will represent an important commitment to this gateway into and through Markham from the west. A new TIF District in this segment of the corridor may aid in redevelopment efforts. Wooded areas along the interchange ramps should be preserved as they provide an important buffer to surrounding neighborhoods. th

2 Triangular area with multiple sites south of 159

th

Pulaski Road, and west of I-57

Street, east of

This area includes commercial and light industrial uses, some vacant land, and an older hotel. Maintaining and supporting these same uses and their owners present short and mid-term opportunities. Given highway access, either the current hotel site or one of this area’s vacant parcels may represent another hospitality use over the long-term.

Canterbury Shopping Center and the nearby Park and Nature Preserve With access to Interstates 294 and 57, Canterbury Shopping Center serves shoppers from the region as well as the local community and capitalizes on the corridor’s regional importance and high traffic volumes. Canterbury and the corridor have a mix of different retailers and food and beverage outlets. Both are near major Markham employers, including the Cook County Courthouse. Just to Canterbury’s east are Markham Park District’s facilities at Roesner Park and to the north is the Gensburg-Markham Prairie Nature Preserve, a National Natural Landmark. This proximity makes Canterbury a nexus for recreation and retail activities. Restaurant and retail options are also located across the street from Canterbury.

The surrounding residential neighborhood also generates significant pedestrian traffic. The lack of complete sidewalks and crosswalks continues to make the area unsafe for pedestrians. In addition, Canterbury’s large parking lot with minimal out lots diminishes the pedestrian’s sense of place along 159th Street. This area is included in a TIF District that runs through 2014. Consequently, there is the potential to enhance Canterbury’s character and appearance for regional shoppers and Markham residents alike and to improve the value of the property for ownership by attracting more and better tenants.

The redevelopment concept for this area, as shown in the I-294/I-57 Interchange Land Use and Economic Development Plan (adjacent table), indicates this improved shopping center value compared with the estimated cost of improvements. Implementing this concept presents an important short-term economic development initiative for Markham. The combination of immediately available TIF funds with a potential partnership with Canterbury’s ownership can improve the center and incorporating the new public space shown in the redevelopment concept.

32

Conceptual development potential and e

This site is the existing Canterbury Shopping Center along 159 Street- a highly traveled corridor in the south suburbs. With access to Interstates 294 and 57, this center serves shoppers from the region as well as the local community. The corridor and site have a mix of different retailers and is near major employers in Markham including the Cook County Courthouse. The site is also close to Markham Park District’s facilities at Roesner Park and the Gensburg-Markham Prairie Nature Preserve, making it a nexus for recreation and retail activities. Restaurant and other retail options across the street from Canterbury and the surrounding residential neighborhood also generate significant pedestrian traffic. However, the lack of complete sidewalks and crosswalks make the area unsafe for pedestrians. In addition, the large expanse of paved parking and minimal outlots set the Center back further from the road, diminishing the pedestrian’s sense of place along the corridor. The site does however lie within a TIF District that runs through 2014. Hence there is the potential to enhance the character of the center for shoppers and residents alike and improve the value of the property.

This site development scenario differs from t City of Markham Comprehensive to Planimprove Section 5 Economic Development and Market Analysis as it examines the opportunity center while providing for a new public ga and an enhanced Pace bus stop. Sidewalk con crosswalks at major intersections are provide pedestrian access to the site. Some of the u Use Estimated Center Value Estimated parking is replaced with naturalized dete Center Net Cost that help with stormwater management wh Income the character of the site. Plazas between a Center Improvements $3,595,300 Shopping Center provide for outdoor seating including Outlots while a landscaped multi-purpose plaza Current Income and Value $2,549,534 $33,993,792 outdoor community events. This plaza also Estimated Income and $3,095,863 $41,278,176 park across the street to the Center and has I-294/I-57 Interchange Land Use and Economic Development Plan Value After Improvements of providing a trail head connection for th Markham Prairie Nature Preserve. Facade e Table 5.4: Improvement potential for the Canterbury Shopping Center Concep for the existing buildings are also proposed.

(See Appendix A for Economic Analysis Methodology)

This site

The development scenario costs in Tableas5.4 in it ex center site and land improvements, and the addition and an Page | 50 (restaurant use) and other suggested site im crosswa Use Estimated Value Estimated ispedestr The estimated cost ofCenter improvements com parking Center Net Cost center values- the current center value, based that he Income the cha average net rents ($18 per square foot) and o Center Improvements $3,595,300 Shoppin including Outlots (about 171,000 square feet) as published while ba Current Income and Value $2,549,534 $33,993,792 leasing broker, and to a potential value,outdoo give Estimated Income and $3,095,863 $41,278,176 park ac center incorporating this site concept and Value After Improvements of provf the average net rentShopping lessCenter expenses.Markha Table 5.4:same Improvement potential for the Canterbury

McDonald’s

ENTRY FEATURES • SIGNAGE • LANDSCAPED PONDS • OVERLOOKS

EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL

NEW SIDEWALK

364

EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL

ADD PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL & CROSSWALKS TO PROVIDE SAFE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TO PARK & MALL

REORGANIZE PARKING & THRU LANES TO CREATE WIDER PEDESTRIAN WALKS AND OUTDOOR SEATING.

LANDSCAPED POND LANDSCAPED POND

KEDZIE

ROESNER PARK LANDSCAPED MULTI-PURPOSE PLAZA SPACE • FOOD TRUCKS • FARM MARKET • EXPANDED PROGRAMMING FROM NEW OUTLOT WITH PARK TO EAST DRIVE THRU

160TH

TROY

IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS

364

RIC

159th STREET

HM

SAWYER

EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL

MALL FACADE ENHANCEMENTS

ON D

PEDESTRIAN WALKS/CROSSWALKS

The dev site and (restaur The est The analysis indicates that an improved center v potentially achieve investor and commun average by creating an additional $7million in(about valu leasing Conceptual sketch and estimated cost. Markham has available centerT from the ‘I-294/I-57 the sam could partnerrendering with Canterbury’s ownership t

Observations:

ADD NEW RRFB TO PROVIDE SAFE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS TO MALL & MCDONALD’S McDonald’s

ENTRY FEATURES • SIGNAGE • LANDSCAPED PONDS • OVERLOOKS

NEW SIDEWALK

KEDZIE

N

SHERWOOD

LANDSCAPED POND

LANDSCAPED POND

GH OTTIN

center, incorporating public space.

I Development the Plan’ new showing the Observ improvements to the Canterbury ownership can attract additional tenantsThetoana for 5.3: Shopping center potenti toFigures ensure increased occupancy and tenant qu ROESNER PARK

LANDSCAPED MULTI-PURPOSE PLAZA SPACE • FOOD TRUCKS • FARM MARKET • EXPANDED PROGRAMMING FROM PARK TO EAST

AM

160TH

HM

SAWYER

RIC

MALL FACADE ENHANCEMENTS

Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

ON

EXISTING PACE BUS STOP

364

EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL

Land Use and Economic

PACE BUS ROUTE

for the

ADD PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL & CROSSWALKS TO PROVIDE SAFE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TO PARK & MALL

REORGANIZE PARKING & THRU LANES TO CREATE WIDER PEDESTRIAN WALKS AND OUTDOOR SEATING.

PLAZA ENHANCEMENTS

4000 Sq.Ft.

Tables A5.3: Cost Estimate for the Site (See Appendix for Economic Analysis Methodology) Source- I-294/I-57 Land Use and Economic Development Plan FRANCISCO

FRANCISCO

NEW OUTLOT WITH DRIVE THRU 4000 Sq.Ft.

WHIPPPLE

159th STREET

WHIPPPLE

ALBANY

TROY

364

SAFE PEDESTRIANview CROSSWALKS Figure 36: Perspective showing potential redevelopment (Prepared by Bondy Studios) TO MALL & MCDONALD’S

ALBANY

ADD NEW RRFB TO PROVIDE IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS

Figure 37: Site plan showing potential redevelopment (Prepared by Teska Associates, Inc.)

D

PEDESTRIAN WALKS/CROSSWALKS

PLAZA ENHANCEMENTS

NOTT

PACE BUS ROUTE EXISTING PACE BUS STOP

SHERWOOD

INGH

AM

by crea estimat could p 33center, owners to ensu

Section 5 Economic Development and Market Analysis

159th Street at I-294

Markham, Illinois

Multi-Family Residential ~ 20%

Office Park

~ 55%

Highway-Oriented Commercial

Land Use

Existing Reservoir

Existing Industrial Park

Future Development West 161

st Stre

et Exte

nsion

Future Redevelopment

Residential Infill

Multi-Family Residential

Office Park

Avenue Artesian

294

ue

rn ste We

6

en Av

Highway-Oriented Commercial

Office Park

Hotel

Site Identity Feature

West 15

9th St reet

Concept Plan Phase I

Highway-Oriented Commercial

Dixie

Irving Avenue

West 160th Street

way High

Phase III West 161st Street Extension

Office Park

Future Redevelopment Bicycle Path

Multi-Family Residential Stormwater Management

Office Park

Phase II

294

Future Development

Existing Industrial Park

Existing Reservoir

2006

Figure 5.4: Concept Plan for Markham Corners Source- Vanderwalle & Associates

Multi-Family Housing

Planned Winchester Bicycle Path

Hamilton Avenue

Residential Infill

Oakley Avenue

Site Identity Feature

West 159th Street Leavitt Avenue

6

Highway-Oriented Commercial

Open Space Amenity & Stormwater Management

34

~ 25%

Vision

Claremont Avenue

In 2006 as a part of a Brownfield grant, Vanderwalle & Associates prepared a concept plan for this study area, referring to it as Markham Corners. The plan focused on the area near the interchange, and included a broad range of using including highway‑oriented commercial, multi-family residential, and a major high-rise office park. The market in 2014 is significantly different than it was in 2006, and particularly the office component of this proposal is probably unrealistic. However, the commercial and multi‑family components of this plan may be appropriate within an overall mixed use development in this area.

Markham Corners

Western Avenue

This COD opportunity is comprised of 174 acres in the above location. The property was originally platted for single-family residential use and was only partially developed.

The City of Markham has acquired a significant portion of the property within this site.

A portion of this site will require some environmental remediation, given past illegal dumping. Parts of the southern portion of this area are within the 100 and 500-year floodplains. The MWRD has developed a strategy for addressing flooding in this area (see illustration on page 59) by creating a regional detention area. Property owners and developers in this area should work closely with the MWRD to implement this plan, or develop alternative strategies to address these flooding issues. The 2013 South Suburban TOD/COD Study calls for a small retail/commercial component along 159th Street. The study also indicates industrial or warehouse uses to the south with the preservation and enhancement of established and existing single-family residences west of Western Avenue.

Av en ue

Street and east of I-294

an

th

Art esi

4 South of 159

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Section 5 Economic Development and Market Analysis

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Implementation Plan To implement this Comprehensive Plan’s recommendations, targeting these four locales will inform Markham’s approach to economic development efforts throughout the City. This targeted approach will require City staff and officials to emphasize the following categories of actions on 159th Street and elsewhere in the community: • Partnerships and Process: As noted, Markham’s best short term commercial opportunity is the suggested partnership to improve Canterbury Shopping Center and to develop public amenities as part of this same partnership. Timing, given the impending TIF expirations in 2014 and 2015, will be critical in achieving the mutual public and private benefits suggested by the redevelopment analysis described in this section. This effort can create a positive perception of Markham, as having the capacity to create a mutually beneficial partnership through a regular municipal approval process.

• Retention and Recruitment: Focusing on both retention and recruitment will be critical to Markham’s economic future. One example is strengthening relationships with business owners of all types. This includes Markham’s commercial and industrial business owners in the triangular area and ensuring that their businesses can expand within Markham. On a separate level, relationships with the established businesses near 159th and Kedzie, including destinations such as Ex-Senator’s and Angler’s Outlets, can be the basis for improving the appearance of their building facades, parking lots and landscaping. For recruitment, relationships with Markham’s property owners for all uses will be important to support tenant recruitment efforts. In each of these examples, future incentives may be required, and the City needs to consider what makes fiscal sense.

• Location and the City’s Economic Options: All of the 159th Street corridor options capitalize on Markham’s great location. As other economic development opportunities emerge in other parts of Markham, recognizing how these location advantages link together to support diverse uses and a strong economy will be critical for the community’s future.

• Regional Resources: Expertise and potential funding sources are readily accessible to City staff through SSMMA, CSEDC and others in the South suburbs.

Separate from the City’s 159th Street’s opportunities, Markham will need to address its housing issues in the short-term. Future investors in the community are interested in a stable community with strong neighborhoods, in addition to a great location.

• Communication: As Markham embraces growth in a methodical way, City officials will need to communicate frequently and transparently with all of the stakeholders involved, including residents, and explain why these economic development efforts are important to the City’s economic success.

Markham’s optimal location is supplemented by good consumer markets for potential retail and restaurant uses, by major employers and smaller industrial concerns, and by residents engaged in their community. By incrementally and comprehensively addressing the City’s economic opportunities, as described in this Plan, Markham will not only capitalize on its location but will ensure its economic future.

35

Section 5 Economic Development and Market Analysis

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

(This page has been intentionally left blank.)

36

Section 6 Land Use

6

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Land Use and Zoning Analysis CMAP 2005 Landuse distribution

Existing Land uses The foundation for formulating future land use decisions is a sound understanding of existing land use patterns. The analysis of existing land use - the distribution of various land uses, and opportunities for future development - begins with a land use survey.

The general land use distribution in Markham as per CMAP’s 2005 data is as shown in the adjacent figure.

Single family residential is the largest land use, while non-residential uses like commercial, industrial, institutional and mixed-use account for approximately 17%. The open space and vacant properties account for around 27%, which is a significant percentage of the community. The following descriptions provide a brief overview of each type of land use within the City.

13.3% 46%

14.1% 2.1% 7.5% 4.5% 2.6%

Single Family Multi Family (less than 1%) Single-Family Commercial Multi Family Industrial Commercial Institutional Industrial Mixed Use Institutional Transportation and Other Mixed Use Agricultural Transportation and Other Open Space Agricultural Vacant Open Space Vacant

9.7% 0.6%

figure 6.1: CMAP land use distribution for Markham (in 2005) Source- CMAP

Residential The majority of the City consists of single-family residential neighborhoods, which are well-distributed throughout the City and served by a street network. While some subdivisions have sidewalks on both sides of the street, many areas do not. As noted above, residential is the largest land use in the City. While there is only one multifamily rental property in the City along Dixie Highway, around 29% of the housing units are currently rental property. Interstates 57 and 294 traversing through the City break up the sense of community in Markham, especially for the subdivision to the east of Robey Street/Dixie Highway. Hence a signage program and design guidelines that are consistent throughout the community are recommended.

37

Section 6 Land Use

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

294

149 th Street

83

POSEN

LEGEND

150 th Street

City of Markham

MIDLOTHIAN

Neighboring Communities L AND U SES Single Family Residential

150 th Street

D ix ie H

Western Avenue

Crawfo rd Avenu e

Townhomes Multi-Family Residential

ig h w a y

HARVEY

Commercial Industrial

154 th Street 57

157th Stree t

Institutional/Municipal

155 th Street

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

Parks Conserved Open Sapce

th

156 Place

ict L Distr

Open Space

159 th Street

ine

Vacant Parcels

ctric

kI sla nd Ro c etr a M

43

Kedzie Avenu e

Di str ict L

ine

Unincorporated Cook County

Metr

a Ele

Surface Drainage Channels Sub-surface Drainage Channels 6

159 th Street

MARKHAM 163 rd Street

OAK FOREST

167 th Street

Center Street

HAZEL CREST

Wood Boulevard

80

Dixie Highway

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

Western Avenue

167 th Street Kedzie Parkway

59

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 6.2: Existing Land Use Map for the City of Markham Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

38

HARVEY

Park

Ave

nue

294

Section 6 Land Use

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Commercial Uses

Industrial

Open space and recreational uses

Commercial uses including retail, restaurants and office/business uses are mostly along Crawford Avenue and 159th Street and in a large part cater to auto traffic along these two corridors. Both these areas are within a half mile driving distance from residential areas and include fast food restaurants in addition to retail options. Canterbury Shopping Center located along 159th Street is a regional retail center, and draws significant traffic from the region. There is however a lack of neighborhood scale commercial uses in the community and also the lack of a focused downtown area.

Markham has several industrial land uses south of 159 Street along Crawford Avenue, Dixie Highway and along 167th Street. There is a cargo oriented development (COD) opportunity for 174 acres along the south side of 159th Street just east of I-294. The property was originally platted for single-family residential use, but was only partially developed. The City has acquired a significant portion of the property within this site. Due to illegal dumping, this site will require some environmental remediation. An environmental study has been conducted in this area, and the City is seeking grants and other funding to remediate this area to a standard which will permit C.O.D. use.

Markham currently has three hotels, the Chicago Southland Inn and Suites, the Hi-way Motel, and the Kozy Budget Motel. The Best Western Plus, located in Oak Forest, is near the 167th Street and I-57 Interchange near Markham’s southern municipal boundary. th

After residential use, open space and parks is the next largest land use in the City. As per CMAP’s 2005 Land Use Inventory, the community of Markham has 45 acres of park and open space per 1,000 residents. This is much higher that the 20.6 acres per 1,000 residents at the county level and 41.6 acres per 1,000 residents at the regional level. A majority of this is due to the conserved prairies within Markham. However, in spite of having this amenity within the community, pedestrian access to the prairies is limited from the neighborhoods. Also, the City needs to capitalize on this open space so that it is a resource to the community. In addition, there is also undeveloped land along I-294 to the south of the new Interchange at I-57 that has potential for adding to the open space amenities in the community.

Institutional and Public Facilities Institutional land use includes publicly owned facilities such as the City Hall, fire station, police station, library and schools, as well as churches. Most of the City buildings are located along Kedzie Parkway.

More detailed information on each of these facilities is provided in the Community Facilities section of this report. A new Senior Housing project has been developed along Kedzie Avenue.

39

Section 6 Land Use

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Existing Zoning

Zoning in Markham is divided into the following districts to accommodate various types of usesR-1 ONE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

R-4 ONE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

R-2 ONE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

R-5A GROUP HOUSES AND GARDEN APARTMENT DISTRICTS

This district is primarily for single-family dwellings where single floor designs should be a minimum of 1,040 sf, split-level designs are 900sf or 800sf for twostory designs, and the minimum lot area is 9,000sf with a minimum lot width of 80 feet.

Similar to R-1, this district is also primarily for singlefamily dwellings where single floor designs should be a minimum of 1,040 sf, except that split-level designs are to be 810sf minimum or 720sf for two-story designs, and the minimum lot area is 8,000sf with a minimum lot width of 70 feet.

R-3 ONE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

This district is for smaller single-family dwellings of 960 sf minimum single floor designs, split-level or two-story designs of 720sf minimum, and a minimum lot area of 7,200 sf with a minimum lot width of 60 feet.

R-3A ONE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Similar to R-3, this district is also primarily for singlefamily dwellings except that single floor designs should be a minimum of 1,050 sf, split-level or two-story designs are 720sf minimum, and the minimum lot area is 6,600sf with a minimum lot width of 57 feet.

R-3B ONE-FAMILY TOWN HOME RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS This district is primarily for one-family town homes that have a minimum of 12,000 sf living space, splitlevel or two-story designs are 720sf minimum, and the minimum lot area is 6,600sf with a minimum lot width of 57 feet.

40

Similar to R-3, this district is for smaller single-family dwellings of 960 sf minimum single floor designs and split-level or two-story designs of 720 sf minimum, except that the minimum lot area is 5,400 sf with 45 foot minimum lot width.

This district allows for two or more living units where efficiency units are a minimum of 450 sf, one-beroom units are a minimum of 600 sf and each additional room is another 100 sf of living floor area, and not more that 25% of the total living units are efficiency. The minimum lot area is 1,900 sf per unit with a 59 foot minimum lot width.

C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING DISTRICTS

This district is for any local retail business or service establishment which supplies commodities or performs services primarily for residents of the surrounding neighborhood. It allows a combination of residential and business uses, provided the residential uses shall conform to the requirements of the R-3 residential district except that the minimum living floor area should be 720 sf.

C-2 COMMUNITY SHOPPING DISTRICTS

L-1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICTS

This district includes any use permitted in the C-2 zone (except residential structures built after 1956), including manufacturing, compounding, processing, packaging or treatment process for various products/ goods. All manufacturing uses within this zone must have a minimum lot area of 20,000 sf or a minimum frontage of 100feet along a public street.

L-2 LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICTS

This district allows all the uses permitted in L-1, including the manufacture of concrete products.

L-3 MOTOR FREIGHT TERMINAL DISTRICTS

This district is designed to accommodate large scale trucking terminal operations on a minimum of 18 acres of land and involving intrastate and interstate motor carriers whose activities are incompatible with the great majority of other land uses. This district is strategically located for efficient coordination with the city’s planned streets and the county and state thoroughfare and highway system. All uses permitted in C-1, C-2, Li- and L-2 are allowed, in addition to the uses permitted in this district.

The height limitation of 30feet is the same for all the districts.

This district allows all the residential and business uses While the zoning code does a good job of outlining the permitted in C-1, in addition to other retail, business or uses permitted, and restrictions for sound levels, noxious fumes and other health and safety issues that affect the personal service establishments. overall quality of life, it does not include any guidelines for energy use. If included, it can significantly reduce the C-3 HOTEL-OFFICE-RESEARCH operating costs of maintaining buildings especially in the This district is yet to be approved. non-residential zones. In addition, requirements for site design, landscaping and screening could be added to enhance the character of the community.

Section 6 Land Use

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

83

149 th Street

LEGEND

150 th Street

Municipal Boundaries 150 th Street

R-2 - One-Family Residential R-3 - One-Family Residential D ix ie H

Western Avenue

Crawfo rd Avenu e

R-4 - One-Family Residential

ig h w a y

C-1 - Neighborhood Shopping C-2 - Community Shopping 154 th Street

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

CH - Church

155 th Street

57

L-1 - Light Manufacturing L-2 - Light Manufacturing

th

156 Place

ine

157th Stree t

C-3 - Hotel-Office-Research

P - Parks 6

159 th Street

a Ele

M - Municipal

Metr

159 th Street

ctric

L-3 - Motor Freight Terminal

ict L

43

Distr

M

etr a

Ro c

kI sla nd

Kedzie Avenu e

Di str ict L

ine

Z ONING D ISTRICTS R-1 - One-Family Residential

PR - Prairie/Conservation S - School SU - Special Use

163 rd Street

167 th Street

Center Street

Wood Boulevard

Dixie Highway

80

Western Avenue

167 th Street Kedzie Parkway

59

Park

Ave

nue

294

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 6.3: Existing Zoning Map for the City of Markham Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

41

Section 6 Land Use

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

In general, the zoning map of the City of Markham is inconsistent with the zoning districts described in the municipal code. The map does not reflect R3-A and R5A residential districts. It also indicates separate districts for parcels that are churches, parks, prairies/conservation and special uses, but does not have any descriptions for them in the municipal code. There are also a number of parcels zoned as municipal districts within the City, which is also not currently a zoning district as per the code. The zoning map also reflects existing land uses instead of ensuring land use compatibility. Due to this, there are a number of residential parcels mixed-in with the light manufacturing districts. This incompatibility needs to be resolved based on the future land use plan recommendations.

TIF Districts The City of Markham also has four TIF Districts as outlined below• TIF 1 (Canterbury TIF)- includes the shopping center at the southeast corner of 159th Street and Kedzie Avenue. This TIF was created in 1991, which suggests it is set to expire in 2014.

• TIF 2- exists on the north side of 159th Street, just east of Francisco Avenue and contains 21 acres including the existing Comfort Suites Hotel. This TIF 83 149 Street POSEN was created in 1992 and will expire in 2015.

150 Street POSEN • Dixie Highway TIF- includes the existing industrial LEGEND of Markham City LEGEND area along Dixie Highway and additional property fronting City of Markham 150 Street Unincorporated Cook County on 159th Street between WesternMIDLOTHIAN Avenue and Francisco Unincorporated Cook County MIDLOTHIAN 43 Communities Neighboring Communities Neighboring Avenue.

HARVEY HARVEY TIF D TIF D ISTRICTS Canterbury TIF • Jevic Business Park TIF - located on the south side TIF Canterbury TIF #2 Markham of 167th Street and north of I-80.

Highway DixieTIF #2 TIF Markham th

th

83

149 th Street

th

D ix ie H

Western Avenue

ig h w a y

ig hw ay

D ix ie H

Western Avenue

Crawford Avenue

Crawfo rd Avenue

th

154 th Street

th

Jevic Business Park TIF

Jevic Business Park TIF

156 th Place

155 Street

ra El

ine

Met

159 th Street

ctric

6

Distr ict L

156 th Place

Metr a Ele

th

MARKHAM

159 th Street

6

$2,704,017.28

OAK FOREST

Jevic Business Park

1997

59

167 th Street

nue

1994

Ave

Dixie Highway

MARKHAM

167 th Street

163 rd Street

$334,063.18COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

80

294

Figure 6.4: Map showing the TIF Districts in Markham

Source- TIF Annual Reports

Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

nue

167 th Street

HARVEY

Cen

Wo

Dix

167 th Street

We

59

Ave

42

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Kedzie Parkway

Table 6.1: TIF Districts in Markham

HAZEL CREST

HARVEY

P a rk

$169,571.10

Park

1992

Center Street

TIF 2

294

Wood Boulevard

$1,459,513.49

Dixie Highway

1991

Western Avenue

TIF 1

163 rd Street

Kedzie Parkway

OAK FOREST 2012 TIF Revenue

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

ectr

159 th Street

First Tax Year

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

Dixie Highway TIF

155 th Street

154 th Street

57

157th Street

ISTRICTS

Line

dD

lan

k Is

Ro c

etr a

M

150 th Street

ic Dis trict

ine

ist ric tL

nd

sla

kI

Ro c

etr a

M

43

The 159 Street corridor between Crawford Avenue and Kedzie Avenue is an area in need of revitalization. This area includes a number of vacant lots and vacant buildings.

It is recommended 57 157 Stree t that the City explore a TIF in this area to provide funding to promote redevelopment and implement some of the urban design 159 Street recommendations contained in this plan. th

th

Kedzie Avenue

Kedzie Avenue

Di str i

ct L

ine

150 Street

Section 6 Land Use

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Future Land Use Plan One of the primary goals of a Comprehensive Plan is the identification of desired development potential and its optimal location on a Future Land Use Map. The map does not necessarily reflect the existing zoning districts for the City of Markham, but instead serves as a guide for future development, annexation and parcel assembly decisions, that would in turn require zoning updates. These areas for future land use were determined by current occupancy and development patterns, the needs and deficiencies in the community, existing vacant parcels and potential infill development, and strategies to full-fill the vision of the City of Markham. The land use map indicates how the City would like to manage growth over the next 10 to 20 years. The map also provides a legal basis for City officials to make planning and land use decisions. Residents and developers can use the map as an informational tool to identify where the City can support new development. The following is an explanation of key development areas and proposed land uses highlighted on the Future Land Use Plan (refer to map on Page 44) for the City of Markham-

• Residential uses - The future land use plan recommends filling the existing vacant parcels in the residential districts with new developments having a smaller unit size in

response to smaller household sizes. In addition, development of certain areas for accommodating higher density residential is also suggested. The following are specific residential area developments as per the future land use plan (see Figure 6.5 on Page 46): • R1 - With convenient access to the new I-294/I-57 Interchange, Sibley Boulevard and Kedzie Avenue, but still located away from busy traffic, this area is recommended for single family development while conserving the south eastern portion for stormwater detention • R2 - With convenient access to the 159th Street commercial corridor, this area is recommended as multi-family residential that can accommodate, young professionals, single adults and even seniors.

• R3 - This area has already been subdivided, and is ideal to accommodate more single family units to accommodate Markham’s growing population

• Commercial uses - There is development potential to the north of 159th Street in the area labeled C1 for retail uses, as well as office or business uses. Recent studies have

considered the possibility of a hotel with banquet facilities as well. Investor interest in developing any hotel/banquet facility will be based upon their demand study examining Markham’s proximity to employment and visitor amenities, such as the Indian Boundary Prairies, and access to capital. Area C2 was identified in the ‘I-294/I-57 Land Use and Economic Development Plan’ as having the potential for a big box retail or cargo oriented development (COD) on the corner of Dixie Highway and 159th Street, and a truck stop, hotel or COD on the western half of the area.

• Industrial uses - The area south of 159th Street and east of I-294 is earmarked in the ‘I-294/I-57 Land Use and Economic Development Plan’ as having a COD opportunity with retail/commercial use along the 159th Street frontage, and industrial/warehouse type of uses to the south.

• Open space conservation - It is recommended that the existing vacant parcels on either side of I-294 leading up to the new I-294/I-57 Interchange be conserved open space to provide a buffer between the roadway and residential areas, and aid in hazard mitigation. In addition, a system of trails is recommended in the community and is outlined in Section 9 of this report, along with a Welcome and Visitor Center along 159th Street with access to the Gensburg-Markham Prairie.

43

Section 6 Land Use

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

LEGEND

150 th Street

City of Markham

R1

Unincorporated Cook County 150 th Street

MIDLOTHIAN

D ix ie H

Western Avenue

Crawfo rd Avenu e

L AND U SES Low Density Residential

ig h w a y

Medium Density Residential

HARVEY

Multi-Family Residential Commercial

154 th Street

R3

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

Industrial 155 th Street

57

157th Stree t

Neighboring Communities

Institutional/Municipal Parks

156 th Place

Mixed-use

ict L a Ele

159 th Street

ine

Conserved Open Space

Distr

43

83

POSEN

ctric

M

etr a

Ro c

kI sla nd

Di str ict L

ine

Kedzie Avenu e

149 th Street

Metr

R2

Surface Drainage Channels Sub-surface Drainage Channels Special Areas

C1

6

159 th Street

C2 MARKHAM 163 rd Street

OAK FOREST

167 th Street

Center Street

HAZEL CREST

Wood Boulevard

80

Dixie Highway

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

Western Avenue

167 th Street Kedzie Parkway

59

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 6.5: Future Land Use Plan for the City of Markham Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

44

HARVEY

Park

Ave

nue

294

Section 6 Land Use

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

City of Markham Opportunities Analysis and Brownfields Site Identification and Prioritization The City of Markham completed an above noted study in 2004. Key highlights of the plan included the following and they are also reflected in the future land use plan: • Opportunity for a quality hotel development • Enhancements to Canterbury Shopping Center • Major regional office opportunities once the I-294/I-57 Interchange is completed • Creation of a Prairie Land Visitor Center • Creation of a Skilled Building Trade Park along Crawford Avenue and 167th Street (just outside the I-294/I-57 Interchange Study Area) • Additional industrial infill development along Dixie Highway, south of 159th Street Given shifts in the economy since completion of this study, opportunities for major office development and quality hotels seem limited today. However, other recommendations – particularly enhancements to the Canterbury Shopping Center and additional visitor amenities to capitalize on local prairie resources remain appropriate suggestions.

Annexation There are two areas adjacent to Markham’s municipal boundary that have the potential for annexation into the City-

149 th Street

2

ine Dis tric tL nd Isla Ro ck etr a M

150 th Street

Di xie Hi

Western Avenue

gh wa y

HARVEY

154 th Street

157th Street

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

155 th Street

57

ctric

Distr ict

Line

156 th Place

Met ra Ele

159 th Street

6

159 th Street

MARKHAM

1

163 Street 294

167 th Street

HAZEL CREST

Center Street

80

Wood Boulevard

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

Dixie Highway

167 th Street

Western Avenue

59

HARVEY

P a rk

A ve

nue

OAK FOREST

rd

Kedzie Parkway

Annexation of these areas would provide the City with control over land use, expand the City’s property tax base, and help to implement Cook County’s efforts to promote incorporation of areas adjacent to existing municipalities to enhance the provision of critical services like police protection to these areas.

Kedzie Avenue

2. There are a few parcels that are currently unincorporated Cook County between the municipal boundaries of Markham and Oak Forest. These are located to the west of Crawford Avenue and south of I-57. Currently, most of these are unincorporated parcels are residential uses, but are adjacent to light industrial and manufacturing uses. Given this incompatibility of land uses, annexation is recommended to provide for expansion of industrial and allied uses in the future.

MIDLOTHIAN

43

Crawford Avenue

1. The parcels to the north west of the new I-294/I-57 Interchange, just south of 150th Street- These parcels are currently unincorporated Cook County.

Given the trend of surrounding land uses, this area can help full-fill the residential needs of the community.

83

POSEN

150 th Street

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 6.6:Annexation map (parcels to be annexed are highlighted in red) Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

45

Section 6 Land Use

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

(This page has been intentionally left blank.)

46

Section 7 Transportation

Transportation Analysis Jurisdiction As depicted on the map below, the City of Markham roadway system consists of state, county, and locally maintained routes. The interstate highway system is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). Tollways are under the jurisdiction of the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority. Interstate 57 runs generally north-south through the west side of the City and connects travelers to Chicago to the north, and the southern tip of the State to the south. The I-294 Tollway runs generally north-south through the east side of the City and provides a link to I-80 just south of Markham and O’Hare International Airport and beyond to the north. Markham also has access to Interstate 80 (which is just south of the City limits) via Kedzie Avenue, I-294, and I-57.

The main east-west road through the City is US Route 6 (159th Street) which is under the jurisdiction of the IDOT and classified as a Federal Route. Dixie Highway and Park Avenue are un-marked State Routes which run north-south through the City and are under the jurisdiction of the IDOT. Pulaski Road (Crawford Avenue) is an un-marked State Route south of US Route 6, while the roadway 149 Street POSEN LEGEND is under Cook County jurisdiction north of US Route 150 Street MIDLOTHIAN City of Markham 6. Wood Street is an un-marked State-Maintained Neighboring Communities Route north and south of the City limits. Within City 150 Street Municipal Boundaries Illinois Department of Transportation limits (167th Street to 161st Street), Wood Street is Illinois State Toll Highway Authority Cook County under the jurisdiction of the City of Markham. IL HARVEY City of Markham Route 83 (Sibley Boulevard) is an east-west State 154 Street Route just north of the City. State and Federal 155 Street roads are designed, constructed, and maintained in 157 Street accordance with the IDOT standards.

Place 83

th

etr a

Ro c

k Is

lan

dD

Kedzie Avenue

ist ric tL

ine

th

M

43

th

D ix ie H

Crawford Avenue

ig hw ay

th

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

th

57

th

ic Dis trict ra El

ectr

159 th Street

Met

The Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways currently has jurisdiction over three major roads in the City of Markham. Kedzie Avenue (County Route 46) is a north-south road and 167th Street (County Route 59) is an east-west road both running through the City. Pulaski Road (County Route 43) is under County jurisdiction north of US Route 6.

Line

156 th

6

159 th Street

CITY OF MARKHAM

163 rd Street

OAK FOREST

294

Ave

nue

All roads not listed as state, county, or federal routes are under the jurisdiction of the City of Markham.

167 th Street

Center Street

HAZEL CREST

Wood Boulevard

80

Dixie Highway

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

Western Avenue

167 th Street Kedzie Parkway

59

HARVEY

P a rk

7

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 7.1:Jurisdiction map for the City of Markham Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

47

Section 7 Transportation

Functional Classification Before the City of Markham streets can be addressed, the functional classification of streets must be defined. Note that traffic volumes and street width do not determine the classification of the road; rather, the continuity, the landuse the street serves, and the way the street functions in the community are the determining factors. The Master Transportation Plan exhibit depicts the locations of all the classified streets. The following hierarchy of streets is based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) functional highway system in urban areas:

1. Interstate Expressway

Typical uses are for regional and national trips. These routes are divided highways with no direct access to fronting properties. Direct access is limited to periodic interchanges.

2. Major Arterial

Many of the trips on a major arterial are trips that span an entire community and beyond to neighboring communities. However, they are meant to serve all types of trips. In many cases, properties fronting major arterials have limited access so as to not impede the traffic flow.

Major arterials typically connect to other regional arterials and expressways to link cities and counties. Often under the jurisdiction of the State or County, these streets typically require a minimum of two lanes in each direction plus turn lanes. Traffic volumes greater than 15,000 vehicles per day can be expected.

3. Secondary Arterial

Also serving all types of trips, the primary use for secondary arterials are trips within the community. This street type is not meant to carry a significant amount of regional trips, however they do often connect to major

48

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

arterials. The main purpose of the secondary arterial is to provide efficient traffic flow and increase the traffic capacity of the community. These roads also service adjacent land-uses with more access points than a major arterial. Secondary arterials do not normally penetrate residential neighborhoods. The majority of these streets are under the jurisdiction of the County or City and typically carry under 15,000 vehicles per day.

4. Major Collector

The primary use for major collectors are trips within the community similar to the secondary arterial, but do not provide the connectivity to neighboring communities. The major collector provides connections between arterials but should not carry many regional trips. Access points to residential, commercial, and industrial areas are found on these streets. Traffic volumes can vary depending on the community and continuity of the street. In the City of Markham, these streets are under jurisdiction of the City and carry between 5,000 and 10,000 vehicles per day.

5. Minor Collector

Also known as a neighborhood collector, these streets typically are meant to serve only vehicle-trips generated to and from residential subdivisions, business developments, or industrial parks in the community. Minor collectors fuse traffic to the major collectors and eventually arterials.

They are not meant as through streets and normally are no longer than one mile. Minor collectors are under City jurisdiction and typically carry less than 5,000 vehicles per day.

6. Residential

Streets in the City are considered as residential unless designated as arterials or collectors. These streets are only meant to connect residences within a neighborhood to collector roadways.

Federal Aid Routes There are a number of Federal Aid Routes designated in the City of Markham. Roads with this designation are eligible to receive funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Federal Aid Urban (FAU) may be eligible for funding for reconstruction, widening/ resurfacing or street lighting. Typically these routes are arterials or collectors and have connections to other Federal Aid Routes. The following is a list of the existing Federal Aid Interstate (FAI), Federal Aid Primary (FAP), and Federal Aid Urban (FAU) routes within the City of Markham limits (refer to the Master Transportation Plan Exhibit for locations): • Interstate 57 – Regional • I-294 Tollway – Regional • Interstate 80 – National • US Route 6 – Throughout City • Dixie Highway – Throughout City • Kedzie Avenue – Throughout City • Pulaski Road (Crawford Avenue) – Throughout City • Wood Street – Throughout City • Park Avenue – Throughout City • 167th Street – From Park Avenue and beyond City to the west • 155th Street/George Brennan Highway – From Pulaski Road to Kedzie Avenue • California Avenue – From US Route 6 to 167th Street • 163rd Street – From Dixie Highway to Park Avenue • 163rd Street/Richmond Avenue – From Central Park Avenue to California Avenue

Section 7 Transportation

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

149 th Street

83

POSEN 0 0 ,5 3 9

Municipal Boundaries City of Markham

Ro c

kI

sla n

dD

Kedzie Avenu e

ist ri

ct L

ine

LEGEND

M

etr a

43

Neighboring Communities

th

150 Street

Interstate Expressway

0 ,9 5 0

HARVEY

ig h w a y

1

Minor Arterial

D ix ie H

Western Avenue

00

4,8

10

Crawfo rd Avenu e

0

Major Arterial

Local Roads

154 th Street XXXX

Average Daily Traffic Counts

0 a Ele5,3 ctric 0 Distr0 ict L in

e

156 th Place

159 th Street

Metr

24,700

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

155 th Street

0 16,0

19,500

57

Major Collector Minor Collector

6,000

157th Stree t

1,550

150 th Street

15,600

15,900

MIDLOTHIAN

22,700

11,900

159 th Street

6

26,800

00

16,6

20,600

CITY OF MARKHAM

23,900

8,000

103,300

163 rd Street 00

2,950

Center Street

HAZEL CREST

167 th Street

Wood Boulevard

75,300

17,200

Dixie Highway

80

Western Avenue 1,750

167 th Street

22,400

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

59

Kedzie Parkway

17,200

HARVEY

Park

Ave

nue

4,9

3 9

294

1,750

13,300

,3

0

0

OAK FOREST

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 7.2: Functional classification map and average daily traffic for the City of Markham Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

49

Section 7 Transportation

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Truck Routes Designated truck routes are intended to direct trucks to suitable roads which are always expressways, arterials, or collectors. They are also meant to keep trucks off local residential streets. Within the State of Illinois, sizes and weights of vehicles permitted to travel along all roadways within the State are governed by Chapter 625 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, Section 5 (Illinois Vehicle Code), Chapter 15. Unless otherwise designated, all roadways within the State fall under the following two, general weight limit criteria: 1. Maximum single-axle load = 18,000 lbs. (9 tons) 2. Maximum multi-axle vehicle gross weight = 73,280 lbs. (36.34 tons)* The Illinois Vehicle Code has also established criteria 149 Street POSEN LEGEND 150 Street for roadways that are specifically designated as Class I, MIDLOTHIAN Municipal Boundaries City of Markham Class II or Class III Truck Routes, summarized as follows: Neighboring Communities 150 Street • Class I Truck Routes include interstate highways, Class I Truck Route Class II Truck Route expressways, tollways, and other highways Average Daily Traffic Counts deemed appropriate by the Illinois Department HARVEY of Transportation (IDOT), or the Local Agency 154 Street responsible for roadway.

155 Street • Class II Truck Routes include major arterial routes 157 Street that have at least 11-foot wide travel lanes and have 156 Place been so designated by IDOT or the Local Agency.

159 Street • Class III Truck Routes include roadways that have 159 Street lane widths of less than 11 feet, and have been so CITY MARKHAM designated by IDOT or the Local Agency.

83

th

Ro c

k Is

lan d

Kedzie Avenue

Dis tric tL

ine

5 ,7 0 0

th

M

etr a

43

th

5 ,8 5 0

ig hw ay

0

,30

D ix ie H

Western Avenue

17

Crawford Avenue

XXXX

th

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

th

57

th

ic Dis trict

Line

th

ra El

ectr

th

Met

1,275

th

6

1,100

2,000

17,000

163 rd Street

OAK FOREST

167 th Street

80

*Note that the Illinois Vehicle Code also includes specific details regarding distribution of the weight for vehicles with multiple axles, multiple spacing between axles, and criteria for widths and lengths of vehicles.

50

14

,10

0

Center Street

50

16,8

Wood Boulevard

Four designated truck routes under State jurisdiction are COUNTRY CLUB HILLS HAZEL CREST present in the City of Markham: • Class I Truck Route – Interstate 57, Interstate 80, Figure 7.3: Truck routes map and average daily truck traffic for the City of Markham I-294 Tollway Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

• Class II Truck Route – US Route 6 (159th Street) All other state, county, and local routes that have not been designated with specific weight restrictions follow the vehicle weight limit criteria under the Illinois Vehicle Code: Chapter 15 as previously described.

Dixie Highway

167 th Street

Western Avenue

59

HARVEY

P a rk

Ave

nue

294

Kedzie Parkway

Those roadways that have been designated as Class I, II or III Truck Routes fall under the following general weight limit criteria: 1. Maximum single-axle loading = 20,000 lbs. (10 tons) 2. Maximum multi-axle vehicle gross weight = 80,000 lbs. (40 tons)

4

,0

0

0

OF

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Section 7 Transportation

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Public Transportation Metra Commuter Rail The Metra Electric District (ME) line currently runs through the eastern border of the City of Markham. This line runs from University Park to Chicago Millennium Station with the nearest stations for Markham residents being 170th Street & Park Avenue in Hazel Crest and 155th Street & Park Avenue in Harvey. These Metra Stations and others can also be accessed by local Pace Bus Routes described below.

Pace Bus System Pace’s fixed route bus service serves more than 220 communities around the Chicagoland area. Multiple Pace Routes run through the City of Markham. The route numbers and a description of each are shown below in Table 1. The streets that the bus routes travel along are also shown on the Master Transportation Plan Exhibit. The Pace South Division Facility is located on 163rd Place in Markham. Route 359 makes a notable stop at the Cook County (Markham) Courthouse. Many of the bus routes through Markham stop at Metra Stations in the surrounding communities as well as the CTA Red Line at 95th Street/Dan Ryan Station and the Pace Harvey Transportation Center. Hospitals, Shopping Centers, and other facilities can be accessed via Pace Buses running through Markham.

Route #

Description

Service

Roads in Markham

Main stops in Markham

Landmarks

354

Harvey-Oak Forest Weekday & Loop Saturday

Dixie Hwy, 167th St

159th/Dixie, 167th Kedzie

Pace Harvey Transportation Center, South Suburban College, Oak Forest Hospital, Metra Stations

356

Harvey-Homewood- Everyday Tinley Park

Wood St

NA

Metra Stations, North Creek Business Center

359

Robbins-S. Kedzie Everyday Avenue

Kedzie Ave, Kedzie Pkwy (select weekdays for Courthouse)

159th/Kedzie

Cook County (Markham) Courthouse, Canterbury Shopping Center, Metra & CTA Stations, South Suburban Hospital, Metro South Medical Center, Illinois Department of Human Services

364

159th Street

Everyday

159th St, Dixie Hwy

159th/Kedzie, 159th Dixie

Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Oak Forest Hospital, Orland Square Mall, River Oaks Shopping Center, South Suburban College, Metra Stations, Pace Harvey Transportation Center

773

US Cellular Field Express

Most White Sox Games

Pace South Division 2101 W. 163rd Place

US Cellular Field, Tinley Park Park-n-Ride

890

South SuburbsUPS Hodgkins

Weekday

NA

Chicago Heights Terminal, Metra Stations, Pace Harvey Transportation Center, Pace Homewood Parkn-Ride, Hodgkins UPS Facility

159th St, I-294

Table 7.1: Pace bus routes and service schedule Source- Pace and Robinson Engineering

51

Section 7 Transportation

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

149 th Street

83

POSEN

MIDLOTHIAN

150 Street

Pace Route

ig h w a y

890

364

D ix ie H

Western Avenue

Crawfo rd Avenu e

773

359

359

356

HARVEY

th

155 Street

CITY OF MARKHAM

P

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

364

Ingalls Memorial Hospital

156 th Place

Distr

Pedestrian Bridge

Harvey Transit Center

154 th Street

57

157th Stree t

890

Pace Route Pace Route Pace Route Pace Route Pace Route

354

ine

M

etr a

43

Pace Park-n-ride Metra Station

th

ict L

Ro ck I

sla

Kedzie Avenu e

nd Di str i

ct L

ine

P

Broadway Avenue

LEGEND City of Markham

150 th Street

Metr

a Ele

ctric

159 th Street

773

159 th Street

6

Greyhound Pickup Location

356

Pace South Division Offices

163 rd Street

OAK FOREST

294

354

South Suburban Community College

Ave

Center Street

Wood Boulevard

HAZEL CREST

Dixie Highway

80

Western Avenue

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

P

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 7.4: Pace bus routes serving the City of Markham Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

52

HARVEY

Park

167 th Street

167 th Street

Kedzie Parkway

59

nue

Cook County Courts

Section 7 Transportation

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Ridership Trends 3500 3000 Passengers per year

354 356

2500

359 2000

364 890

1500 1000 500

Other observations on Pace routes and ridership in Markham-

Figure 7.5: Pace bus route ridership trends

• A majority of the community is served by Pace bus routes, many

Source- RTAMS website (http://www/rtams.org/rtams/ridershipHome.jsp)

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

0

of which connect to the Harvey Metra Station. However, there is no direct connection to the Midlothian Metra Station.

• The ridership trend for all the routes in general have increased

over the years (figure 7.5), with a general increase on the weekend in recent years.

Figure 7.6: Route 354 Ridership trend for December Source- RTAMS website (http://www/rtams.org/rtams/ridershipHome.jsp)

53

R B

Section 7 Transportation Existing Pedestrian Bridge

³ í ì ë é a "

6 £ ¤

a "

a "

³ í ì ë é

83 " ) ³ é í ì ë

a "

0

4,90

IL L INE RA ER UT

CO

TR IC

L EC

AE

KA VE

TR

1,550

00

10

5 ,9

,800

Y

³ í ì ë é

156TH ST

£ ¤

³ í ì ë é

" a

Railroad PACE Bus Route Markham City Limits Floodway

0 5,30

CENTER AVE

IL L INE RA

94

§ ¦ ¨

Interstate

6 ¢ ¡

US Highway

83 Æ ) 59 ) Æ

State Route

9200

County Highway Traffic Counts

Figure 7.7: Future transportation plan

ER UT MM

0

Prepared by- Robinson Engineering

TR IC

CO

4,90

L EC AE

KA VE

ET R

a "

163RD ST

1,750

a "

162ND ST

ASHLAND AVE

Cook County (Markham) Court House

" a ³ í ì ë é WOOD ST

ñ Æ

³ í ì ë é

AR

AV E ON D HM

294

RIC

AV E SE T N SU 00 ,4 93

¦ ¨ § 103,300

a "

"" a a

a "

CALIFORNIA AVE

DR

KEDZIE PKWY

TURNER AVE

NE

City Hall

Station

Proposed Traffic Signal

Areas of 0.2% Annual Chance Flood 6

8,000

KEDZIE AVE

LAWNDALE AVE

13,300

PULASKI RD/CRAWFO

LA I

ñ Æ

Existing Traffic Signal

³ í ì ë é

Areas of 1% Annual Chance Flood

16,600

20,600

CENTRAL PARK AVE

IRVING AVE

11,900

BE LL EP

³é é í ì ë ³ í ì ë a "

í ì ë é ³

a "

23,900

163RD ST

Metra Station

158TH ST

26,800

M:\Mark eting\Mark ham\Master_Transportation_Plan_Flood.mxd

Á ¾

PA R

ST Markham The City of Markham is157TH currently considering adding the following routes to the Federal Classification System: a " ST 57 • Sunset Avenue – Pulaski Road (Crawford Avenue) to Central Park Avenue. ¦ ¨ § ³ í ì ë é • "a Belleplaine Drive – Extension of 159TH Central Park Avenue route to 167th Street.

159TH ST ST 6 a 6 ³ " í ì ë é £ aé " ³ a " ¤ £ í ì ë ¤ a " ³ í ì ë é ³ ³ í ì ë é a " a " í ì ë é ³ í ì ë é

159 TH

Class II Truck Route

Secondary Arterial

KA VE

Existing Pedestrian Bridge

a " Ingalls Memorial Hospital

Major Arterial

Conceptual Collector

Á Harvey ¾ Metra

a " a " ³é ³ í ì ë é í ì ë

155TH ST

LEGEND

Minor Collector

a "

W

H

N

A N

EN

R

B

19,500

P Æ

a "

2,400 Feet

Major Collector

a "

15,600

³ í ì ë é

155TH ST

1,600

Interstate Expressway

a "

6,000

³ í ì ë é 3. Logical 155TH ST addition to the Federal Roadway Network System

800

Sibley Blvd Metra Station

BROADWAY AVE

a "

ASHLAND AVE

104

43 " )

54

a147th Street "

2. Existing roadway classification is either and arterial or a collector (connects to the arterial system, 154TH ST ³ a é " í ì ë ³ í ì ë é connects commercial and industrial areas to arterials, and spacing "aminimum of a halféëìí"a³mile apart).

Class I Truck Route

400

1 " = 800 '

Harvey

Class I Truck Route

Traffic Counts

®

a "

1,050

ROBEY AVE

³ í ì ë é

County Highway

ME

PA R

a "

³ é í ì ë

Hazel Crest Metra Station

COUNTRY AIR DR

State Route

MORGAN ST

WOOD ST

HW Y

152ND ST

83 Æ ) 59 ) Æ

Harvey

¾ Á Midlothian The existing Federal Aid Routes are listed above in Subsection C. of the Existing Transportation Network ST 150TH section. These routes are eligible to receive funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for certain ³ í ì ë é ³ í ì ë é a " transportation and/or enhancement improvements. A street recommended for Federal Aid function re-classification a a " a" " needs to meet the following criteria: "a ³ í ì ë é

US Highway

0

SIBLEY BLVD

³ í ì ë é

6 ¢ ¡

2,950

a "

a " 170TH ST

Interstate

9200

LOOMIS ST

¦ ¨ §

57Crest Hazel

22,700

94

a "

15,900

PULASKI RD/CRAWFORD AVE

¦ ¨ § 294

Potential Federal Aid Routes

³ í ì ë é

³ í ì ë é

168TH ST

HEAD AVE

Posen

DIXIE WESTERN AVE

KEDZIE AVE

¦ ¨ § 80

DIXIE HWY

1,750

Interchange Under Construction (2014 Completion/Stage 75,200 I)

§ ¦ ¨

1,750

City of Markham, Illinois

1. Beginning and ending termini must be existing Federal Aid Routes

Forest

CENTER AVE

ON D

00 ,4

HM

RIC

ASHLAND AVE

WOOD ST

103,300

CALIFORNIA AVE

KEDZIE PKWY

TURNER AVE

Cook County (Markham) Court House

13,300

PULASKI RD/CRAWFORD AVE

LAWNDALE AVE

93

162ND ST

17,200

Country Club Hills

³ í ì ë é

³ é í ì ë

17,200

Class I Truck Route

24,700

6 £ ¤

8,000

a "

AV E

AV E

SE T

23,900

"é a ³ í ì ë

Areas of 0.2% Annual Chance Flood

159TH ST

As illustrated on the adjacent Master Transportation Plan, the existing main-stem roadway network is well ³ established; í ì ë é a " 294 I-294 (aka Tri-State Tollway) and I-80. In order to particularly with the presence of major interstate access via I-57, ¦ ¨ § 163RD ST 163RD ST ³ í ì ë é ³é í ì ë ³the eastern portion of the City, and to accommodate future development, í ì ë enhance north-south access throughé the a " ñ Æ a " a " extension of WesternBE Avenue north of 167th Street to 159th Street (US Route 6) has been included in the Plan. It LL a " a " PL is anticipated that this Estreet extensionÆñwould include a new traffic signal installation at the 159th Street/Western AI NE DR a" " Avenue (Irving Avenue) intersection. a This concept has also been discussed as part of the I-294/I-57 Interchange a " a " planning study being spearheaded by the South Suburban Mayors and Managers (SSMMA). The extension of a " ST 167TH a " Western Avenue willSTnot only provide to north-south travel, but will 167TH aimprovement 59 aé " ³ in this area 59 ³ Plan í ì ë ³ spur development í ì ë é í ì ë é " Á ) a Transportation " " ) 59 ³ an" a é " í ì ë Master " ) aé " ³¾ í ì ë a " of the community. a "

k Forest

Areas of 1% Annual Chance Flood

158TH ST

16,600

KEDZIE AVE

N

³ í ì ë é

20,600

CENTRAL PARK AVE

SU

a "

a "

City Hall

Floodway

0

³ í ì ë é

PACE Bus Route

Markham City Limits City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

5,30

159TH ST

³ í ì ë é

a "

IRVING AVE

11,900

26,800

³ í ì ë é

" a

PA R

Future Transportation Plan Conceptual Roadway Network

³ í ì ë é

³ í ì ë é

Class II Truck Route

6 £ ¤

Station

a "

a "

57

a "

156TH ST

Markham

¦ ¨ §

ST

³ í ì ë é

Ingalls Memorial Hospital

Railroad

MM

³ é í ì ë

159 TH

a "

P Æ

a "

157TH ST 24,700

³ í ì ë é

³ 155TH ST í ì ë é

a " a " ³é ³ í ì ë é í ì ë

155TH ST

KA VE

N A N EN

19,500

155TH ST

¾ Harvey Á Metra

15,600

a "

Class I Truck Route

43 " )

®

City of Markham, Illinois a "

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan Master Transportation Plan a " 22,700

0 90 5,

,800

a "

Y W H N A N R B 167TH ST

a "

a "

³ í ì ë é

PA R

a "

167TH ST

17,200

170TH ST

94

83 Æ ) 59 ) Æ

5,30

a³ " é í ì ë DIXIE HWY

Hazel Crest

168TH ST

HEAD AVE

75,200

WESTERN AVE

80

§ ¦ ¨

³ í ì ë é

0

³ í ì ë é

1,750

¦ ¨ §

59 " )

E IL L INE

163RD ST

CO

4,90

0

MM

UT

ER

RA

9200

L EC

TR IC

PA R 59 " )

Class I Truck Route

Country Club Hills

a "

162ND ST

AE

AV E ON D HM RIC

AV E SE T N SU ,4

59 " )

6 £ ¤

1,750

Cook County (Markham) Court House

159TH ST

ASHLAND AVE

"" a a

" a ³ í ì ë é WOOD ST

ñ Æ

³ í ì ë é

103,300

City Hall

a "

6 ¢ ¡

294

a "

DR

³ í ì ë é a "

6 £ ¤

23,900

aé " ³ í ì ë

¦ ¨ § CALIFORNIA AVE

ñ Æ

KEDZIE PKWY

NE

³ í ì ë é

a "

a " 17,200

a "

a "

8,000

00

³ í ì ë é

158TH ST

16,6 00

KEDZIE AVE

LA I

³é é í ì ë ³ í ì ë a "

TURNER AVE

aé " ³ í ì ë

159TH ST

³ í ì ë é

" a

Station

a "

20,600

CENTRAL PARK AVE

LAWNDALE AVE

13,300

PULASKI RD/CRAWFORD AVE

Oak Forest

Á Harvey ¾ Metra

a " a " ³é ³ é í ì ë í ì ë

156TH ST

KA VE

a "

163RD ST

BE LL EP

Ingalls Memorial Hospital

³ é í ì ë

a "

ME TR

26,800

³ í ì ë é

154TH ST

155TH ST

a "

³ í ì ë é

Class II Truck Route

IRVING AVE

11,900

6 £ ¤

³ í ì ë é

a "

57

a "

³ a ë " é í ì

í ì ë é ³

Markham

¦ ¨ §

ST

93

a "

³ í ì ë é

159 TH

P Æ

a "

Existing Pedestrian Bridge

a³ " é í ì ë

³ í ì ë é

³ 155TH ST é í ì ë

157TH ST 24,700

6,000

³ í ì ë é " a

EN 19,500

155TH ST

Á ¾

a " Harvey

15,600

43 " )

BROADWAY AVE

ROBEY AVE

ASHLAND AVE

a " 104

10

1,550

1,050

HW Y

15,900

a "

a "

a "

Class I Truck Route

Class I Truck Route

³ í ì ë é

150TH ST

³ í ì ë é

³ í ì ë é

³ í ì ë é

a "

SIBLEY BLVD

WOOD ST

DIXIE

57

COUNTRY AIR DR

a "

a "

¦ ¨ §

a " 152ND ST

83 " ) ³ í ì ë é

³ é í ì ë

a "

MORGAN ST

294

³ í ì ë é

LOOMIS ST

¦ ¨ §

KEDZIE AVE

PULASKI RD/CRAWFO RD AVE

³ í ì ë é

Midlothian

Posen

KA VE

a " Interchange Under Construction (2014 Completion/Stage I)

CEN TER AV

Section 7 Transportation Á ¾

2,950

"é a ³ í ì ë

³ é í ì ë

³ í ì ë é

a " ³ í ì ë é

Hazel Crest Á Metra ¾ Station

55 a "

Section 7 Transportation

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Future Improvements The Illinois Tollway and the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), together with the efforts of local communities and agencies, have initiated the construction of the long-sought interchange to connect the Tri-State Tollway (I-294) to I-57. The I-294/I-57 Interchange is expected to increase economic development, create and sustain jobs and enhance mobility and access throughout the Chicago Southland. The first phase of the I-294/I-57 Interchange Project will create access from northbound I-57 to northbound I-294 and southbound I-294 to southbound I-57, including a new interchange at 147th Street, and is scheduled to be completed in 2014, delivering 75 percent of the project’s benefits to the traveling public. The full interchange is expected to be completed in 2024.

The traffic on all Markham streets will be monitored for capacity needs. The City will first complete a pavement evaluation survey and develop a multi-year plan for the rehabilitation of the local street system. The results of the 2014 survey are as follows and are further identified on the exhibit entitled “2014 Pavement Conditions”: As can be extrapolated from the above data, the Pavement Condition Length Percent of City has done a good job on maintaining their local (miles) Total streets, with only 15% of the system in need of Excellent 2.7 5% significant repairs or replacements. The streets Good 20.3 36% found to be “Excellent” or “Good” require little, if any, repairs and should be monitored annually to Fair 24.6 44% make sure that unanticipated deterioration does Inferior 7.1 13% not occur. Those streets identified as “Fair” should Poor (reconstruction needed) 1.0 2% be considered for minor repairs (such as pothole repairs), as well as included in an annual crackTOTAL 55.7 100% sealing program to continually extend the service Table 7.2: 2014 Pavement conditions survey results life of the pavement. Both the “Inferior” and “Poor” Source- Robinson Engineering streets need to be programmed for repairs over the next 1 to 5 years; with priorities of repairs to not only take into consideration pavement condition, but also include a cost-benefit review. While the “Poor” streets are in the highest need for repairs based upon condition, a street repair program that would first include the “Inferior” streets may be more cost effective since the repairs would prolong the service life of the pavement along these roadway, thus keeping them from deteriorating to a “Poor” condition that could include many more miles of pavement reconstruction with a much higher construction cost.

The City will prepare for future roadway improvements by preserving sufficient right-of-way when new developments come in to allow for roadway expansion and compliance with the recommended City typical section standard details (Figure 7.8). All new roads and improvements should follow these City of Markham Standards with respect to rightof-way width, pavement width, pavement sections, curb & gutter types, and possible medians. Refer to Table 7.3 for the right-of-way and pavement widths of the different street classifications.

56

Street Classification

Right-ofWay Width

Pavement Width

Secondary Arterial

100 feet

(2) 24 feet E-E plus median

Major Collector

100 feet

40 feet E-E

Minor Collector

80 feet

36 feet E-E

Local Residential

66 feet

29 feet E-E

Table 7.3: Right-of-way and pavement widths, City of Markham Source- Robinson Engineering

TYPICAL SECTION SECONDARY ARTERIAL

LEGEND

TYPICAL SECTION SECONDARY ARTERIAL (ALTERNATE)

LEGEND

Figure 7.8: Typical section details CITY OF MARKHAM STANDARD DETAIL

Source- Robinson Engineering

DATE ADOPTED: No.

Date

Remarks

Section 7 Transportation

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

WINCHESTER AVE

COOPER AVE

BROADWAY AVE

TURLINGTON AVE

LOOMIS AVE

LEXINGTON AVE

VINE AVE

MYRTLE AVE

VINE AVE

MYRTLE AVE

CENTER AVE

LEXINGTON AVE

Fair Inferior Poor/Reconstruct

CO MM

ER CIA LA

VE

E 156TH ST

W 158TH ST

W 158TH PL

WEST AVE

PAULINA ST

OAKLEY AVE

TURLINGTON AVE

PAULINA ST

ASHLAND AVE

INGALL S DR

LOOMIS AVE

HONORE AVE

WOOD ST

MARSHFIELD AVE

PAULINA ST

PAGE AVE

ROBEY AVE

SEELEY AVE

OAKLEY CT

OAKLEY AVE

Good

E 157TH ST

E 158TH ST

DAMEN AVE

HERMITAGE AVE

LEXINGTON AVE

LATHROP AVE

W 165TH ST

167TH ST

W 167TH ST

167TH ST

W 167TH ST 167TH ST

W 167TH ST

W 167TH ST

167TH ST

167TH ST

169T

H ST

169TH ST

BARON DR

PAGE AVE

LINCOLN ST

SHEA AVE

BULGER AVE

TRAPET AVE

HEAD AVE

CRANE AVE

ANTHONY AVE

SUNSET RD

168TH ST

CENTER AVE

PAR

K AV

E

PAULINA ST

MARSHFIELD AVE

HONORE AVE

WOLCOTT AVE

WINCHESTER AVE

I-294-EXPY

I-294-EXPY

W 164TH ST

CRESCENT DR

155

LAFLIN AVE

W 163RD ST

PLYMOUTH DR

W 167TH ST

I-80

JUSTINE ST

OAKLEY AVE

W 162ND ST

ASHLAND AVE

W 162ND ST

S OXFORD DR

167TH ST

MYRTLE AVE

AV E

WESTERN AVE

RICHMOND ST

CALIFORNIA AVE

RICHMOND AVE

ALBANY AVE

W 167TH ST

E 160TH ST

W 161ST ST

W 161ST ST

E 159TH ST

GAUGER AVE

VINE AVE

W 160TH ST

PAGE AVE

LEAVITT AVE

HAMILTON AVE

IRVING AVE

OAKLEY AVE

CLAREMONT AVE

E TE SIA N

AV

CT EX

SS

HM RIC

AV E

W 160TH ST

JODAVE AVE

80

LE

ORCHARD RIDGE AVE

§ ¨ ¦

DA

ARTESIAN AVE

GLEN OAKS DR

ON

D AV KEDZIE PKWY

SPAULDING AVE

TURNER AVE

LAWNDALE AVE HAMLIN AVE

167TH ST

Excellent

E 153RD ST

W 157TH PL

W 163RD PL

W 165TH ST

W 166TH ST

167TH ST

154

RN

LANCASTER DR

OXFORD DR

W 166TH ST

I-80

R

MOZART AVE

W 167TH ST

ED

Æ ñ

DR

AVE

BRIARGATE DR

SU

CLIFTON PARK AVE

HAMLIN AVE

KEDVALE AVE

TH O

§ ¨ ¦

STAFFORD DR

R

TURNER

167TH ST

T

LEGEND

W 157TH ST

W 157TH PL

W 162ND ST

DR

DR

AL E

AR

ROCKWELL AVE

D DR

EL MD

294

W 163RD ST

LD DR

169TH ST

W

W OO

CLAREMONT CT

CLAREMONT AVE

ROCKWELL AVE ALBANY AVE

TROY AVE

I-294

CT GE CA MB RID

N OXFOR

W 164TH ST

BUTTERFIE

167TH PL 168TH ST

168TH PL

VIE

GE

A VE

167TH ST

CT

D

W 167TH ST

W ED

WATKI NS

E

LINCOLN AVE

OAKLEY AVE

SEELEY AVE

HOYNE AVE

LEAVITT AVE

VAIL AVE

ARTESIAN AVE

CAMPBELL AVE

MAPLEWOOD AVE

ARTESIAN AVE

TALMAN AVE

ROCKWELL AVE

WASHTENAW AVE

CAMPBELL AVE

ST

FAIRFIELD AVE

DR

VE

E

MA

SH I

W 166TH PL

LA IN

W 156TH ST

W 155TH PL

BERK

LN

CRAWFORD AVE

LN

WHIPPLE AVE

SPAULDING AVE

HOMAN AVE

TURNER AVE

SAWYER AVE

ST LOUIS AVE

TRUMBULL AVE

CLIFTON PARK AVE

CENTRAL PARK AVE AV E T SE N SU

E NT AG

CO

Y W H N BR I-5 EN 7 NA

CLIFTON PARK AVE

LAWNDALE AVE

SPRINGFIELD AVE

R D ES T R C

RD

E AV

LD

HA

Æ ñ

W 165TH ST

LL EP

ES

® Conditions

E 154TH ST

Y

I NG

RC LE D

STAFFORD DR

LC R

E 149TH ST

E 152ND ST

HW DIXIE

VE

SUSSEX AVE

HIL PL AIN

2.7 20.3 24.6 7.1 1.0

E 148TH ST

E

AVE

A OD WO

WILSHIRE AVE

W 162ND ST

P Æ

159TH ST

CI

W 164TH ST

W 166TH ST

E 150TH ST

E 155TH ST W 155TH ST

E AV

L IN W 162ND PL

E 149TH ST

W 154TH PL

W 158TH ST

159TH CT

NOT T

W 154TH ST

W 155TH ST

W 157TH ST

R

M HA

DR

E CT

Length (mi)

W 156TH PL

W 159TH ST

W 161ST ST

W 153RD ST

HOYN

W 158TH ST

W 160TH ST

ARTHUR TER

LD

FR O

LIN

LN

WESTERN AVE

I-5 7

RD

W 155TH ST

S HE R

IE

GIN S

RRAC

AV E

E 151ST ST

W 153RD ST

CAMPBELL AVE

T

DR

HOYNE AVE

Y O TR

KE

IA

DR

COOPER AVE

AV E

CYPRUS RD

MILLARD AVE

BIRCH RD

LAWNDALE AVE

34 8

HAMLIN AVE

OC

E

WASHTE NAW AVE

HAMLIN AVE

MILLARD AVE

RIDGEWAY AVE

34 8

ID

AF TO N

SE MANOR TER

GF

HUG

FIE

S HARRISON AVE

S RICHMOND AVE

S WHIPPLE ST

S TROY AVE

MILLARD AVE

AVERS AVE

SPRINGFIELD AVE

AVERS AVE

RADAY DR

LN CE RA TE R

S ALBANY AVE

14 8T H

PL

ALBANY AVE

CR

KS

W 157TH ST

BLACKSTON E AVE

G

W 152ND ST

LEAVITT AVE

AVERS AVE

LIT ON

W 156TH ST

§ ¨ ¦

IN

Length (ft) 14,100 107,300 129,900 37,700 5,400

W 152ND ST

CA

PA R

BE

KILBOURN AVE

W 150TH ST

ROESNER DR

WILLOW LN

SP R IN

BLAIR LN

W 149TH PL

W 150TH PL

Condition Excellent Good Fair Inferior Poor W 149TH ST

4 I-29

CHERRY LN

AVE

N BARTO 34 6

W 148TH PL

LD

W 151ST TER

HEATHER DR

SUNSET AVE

RO

BARRY LN

167TH ST

SP AU

W 148TH ST

W 151ST PL

MAGNOLIA DR

57

163RD ST

166TH ST

W 149TH ST

W 155TH ST

W 157TH ST

UR TE ARTH

165TH ST

S BLAINE AVE

MAPLE LN

RIDGEWAY AVE

LAWNDALE AVE

HARDING

LAURA LN

WAGMAN ST

§ ¨ ¦ 57

CALIFORNIA AVE

HAMLIN AVE

PULASKI RD

153RD ST

W 156TH ST

L

TH

W 153RD ST

153RD PL

W 155TH ST

HP

S CLEVELAND AVE

W 151ST ST

154TH ST

159T

W 15 0

0 35

W 151ST ST

W 154TH PL

W

W 149TH ST

152ND PL

153RD ST

W

294

S MOZART AVE

151ST ST

§ ¨ ¦

SACRAMENTO AVE

152ND ST

W 150TH ST

KEDZIE AVE

151ST PL

LAWNDALE AVE

151ST ST

SPRINGFIELD AVE

HARDING AVE

TRIPP AVE

HARDING AVE

DR

CENTRAL PARK AVE

VE

WILLOW CREST

RIDGEWAY AVE

HAMLIN AVE

KEDVALE A

KEELER AVE

150TH ST

150TH ST

S SACRAMENTO AVE

W 149TH ST 149TH ST

149TH ST

S FRANCISCO AVE

City of Markham, Illinois 2014 Pavement Conditions

168TH ST

CHARLESTON LN 169TH ST M:\Marketing\Markham\Pavement Conditions.mxd

Figure 7.9: 2014 Pavement conditions Prepared by- Robinson Engineering

57

Section 7 Transportation

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Use

B Short Term (1 to 3 years)

Mid Term (4 to 6 years)

Add Sunset Avenue and Belleplaine Drive to the Federal Aid Route program Complete engineering and work with property owners to acquire right-of-way for Western Avenue extension between 159th and 167th Streets.

Complete Pavement Evaluation Survey and develop Capital Improvement Plan

Work with Pace to enhance pedestrian access in and around bus stops.

Estimated Center Value Center Net Long-TermIncome (7 plus years)

E

Work with Pace to provide additional bus stops as needed along 159th Street to accommodate new development

$3

Center Improvements Outlots Secure fundingincluding for Western Avenue extension Complete construction of the Western Avenue (including developer contributions, TIF, and grants) extension and work with IDOT to provide a traffic and begin roadway construction at$2,549,534 the new Western Avenue/159th Street Current Income and Valuesignal $33,993,792 intersection to seek funding for roadway Estimated Income and Continue $3,095,863 $41,278,176 improvements and implement and update Capital Improvement Plan Value After Improvements Work with IDOT on ways to improve pedestrian/bike Construct enhanced pedestrian improvements Continue to seek funding for roadway improvements and implement and update Capital Improvement Plan

Work with IDOT to implement pedestrian improvements in and around the Canterbury Shopping access along 159th Street across the interchanges Center outlined in the I-294/I-57 Interchange Land Use at I-57 and the Tollway Authority at I-294 and Economic Development Plan (page 51)

along 159th Street and remove the existing, non-

Table 5.4: Improvement potential the Canterbury ADA compliantfor pedestrian bridge over I-57 Shopping Ce (See Appendix A for Economic Analysis Methodology)

ALBANY

TROY

IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS

364

159th STREET

WHIPPPLE

Table 5.4: Transportation Implementation Strategies

NEW OUTLOT WITH DRIVE THRU 4000 Sq.Ft.

E

58

McDonald’s

ENTRY FEATURES • SIGNAGE • LANDSCAPED PONDS • OVERLOOKS

EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL

REORGANIZE PARKING & THRU LANES TO CREATE WIDER PEDESTRIAN WALKS AND OUTDOOR SEATING.

ADD NEW RRFB TO PROVIDE SAFE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS TO MALL & MCDONALD’S

NEW SIDEWALK

159th Street

Figure 5.5: Sketch showing pedestrian improvements across 159th Street LANDSCAPED POND

LANDSCAPED POND Source- I294-I57 Land Use and Economic Development Plan, Teska Associates, Inc.

EXISTING TRAFFIC SIG

ADD PEDESTR & CROSSWALKS SAFE PEDESTRI TO PARK

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

Community Facilities, Infrastructure and Stormwater Management Municipal Facilities The City of Markham has a new City Hall building that houses all the administration offices including the Mayor’s office, building and housing, public works, police, and fire departments. While new, the building does not currently have any green building certifications, nor are there any energy and water saving measures in place.

Police Department

LEGEND City of Markham

ine ist ric tL dD lan k Is

Country-Aire Park

Prairie/Open Space Conservation Markham Park District Parks

Bel-Aire Park

ig hw ay

Lone Pine Park

D ix ie H

Western Avenue

Donnelly Park

3.

Cook County Forest Preserve

Parks outside Markham Stormwater Detention Ponds

HARVEY

Anderson Oglesby Public Library

6.

Markham City Hall Schools with outdoor recreation

154 th Street th

155 Street

7.

Line

ic Dis trict

McNeil Park

Sunshine Park

156 th Place

8.

Radio Station Park

6 Canterbury Shopping Center

ectr

13.

Gensburg- Markham Prairie

Peterzak Memorial Park

ra El

Dropseed Prairie Nature Preserve

Markham Water Tower #2

1. Spaulding School 2. Central Park School 3. Bremen Community High School 4. Beacon Hill School 5. Rosa Parks Middle School 6. Washington School 7. Elmer G Kich School 8. Maya Angelou School 9. Rilay Preschool 10. Dr Ralph J Bunche School 11. Robert Frost Middle School 12. Prairie Hill Jr High School 13. McClaughry School 14. Markham Park Elementary School

57

Paintbrush Prairie Nature Preserve 157th Street

159 th Street

Neighboring Communities 150 th Street

Met

Ro c etr a

2.

43

Unincorporated Cook County

4.

Sundrop Prairie Nature Preserve

MIDLOTHIAN

Kedzie Avenue

th

159 Street

Roesner Memorial Park

9.

Martin Luther King Park

MARKHAM Markham Memorial Park

14.

163 rd Street

Markham Boys League Baseball Fields

Markham Water Tower #1

12.

Fire Station 2

294

MWRD Stormwater Detention Area

10. nue

OAK FOREST

Center Street

HAZEL CREST

Wood Boulevard

80

167 th Street

Dixie Highway

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

P a rk

11.

167 th Street Western Avenue

59

HARVEY

Ave

Cook County Court House

Kedzie Parkway

The department has sworn staff including the police chief, two deputy chiefs, one lieutenant, six sergeants, twenty-nine full-time patrol officers and twenty part-time patrol officers. In addition, the department has civilian staff including one full-time 911/records supervisor, five full-time

5.

83

POSEN 150 th Street

Crawford Avenue

The police department works from the original (older) portion of the City Hall building. The department has not had a specially designed police station since 1960 and the current building is not ideally laid out. Efforts have been made over the years to modernize the facility, but it is still inadequate (eg.: lacks space for an exercise room). The lock-up area meets State standards, but there are plumbing and HVAC issues. Due to new federal requirements, the Markham Police 911 Center was recently updated. A new police station near City Hall would be a big and needed improvement.

1.

149 th Street

M

8

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 8.1: Community Facilities Map Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

59

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

911 radio operators, five part-time radio operators, two part-time records clerks, one chief administrative assistant and one full-time animal control officer. The civilian staffing is not adequate at this time. There is a need of funding for a minimum of two additional full time radio operators, two additional part-time radio operators and one or two part-time records clerks. On the other hand, the sworn staff is adequate at this time with between five to twelve officers per shift. The number of officers per shift depends on season, day, time of day and special event if any. There is a minimum staffing agreement between the City and the Union.

The city strives to supplement the patrol force above the minimum staffing levels in accordance with budget constriants and part time patrol officer availability.

However, the Department would need to change the number of both sworn and civilian staff to serve any significant changes in the population, demographics, crime statistics, house occupancy, business growth, popular venues, large employers, new laws and rules, union contracts and budget allocations.

The department does not have a Community Policing Program, however, members of the command staff do regularly attend community meetings and other meetings when requested. and all the 911 dispatch calls are handled by the Markham Police Department.

The department offers a Citizens Policy Academy once or twice a year depending on community interest. With respect to equipment, the department has forty-seven vehicles. While most of the vehicles are relatively new and are kept in good operating condition, several are old and will need to be retired soon. A couple more SUVs and a new prisoner transport van would be beneficial to the department.

60

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Fire Department The department has one fire chief, one deputy chief and 21 full time staff. The department operates three stations for which the fire fighting staff is sufficient, but is in need of more administrative staff support.

The existing stations lack training facilities.Stations #1 and #3 operate 24/7 with full‑time staff. Station #3 is currently under renovation. Station #2 was built in the 1950’s. It is not designed to accommodate full-time staff and is in need of an upgrade. In addition, the 75 foot ladder truck also need to be replaced as it is more than 20 years old. One of the front line pumpers will also need replacement in the next 3 to 5 years and a budget for that needs to be set aside accordingly.

Based on these facilities and current practices, the Fire Department has an ISO Public Protection Classification (PPC™) rating of 6. PPC ratings run from Class 1 (generally represents superior property fire protection) to Class 10 (indicating that the area’s fire-suppression program does not meet ISO’s minimum criteria)1. Upgrades to its facilities can help the department improve its rating.

The department does not have a volunteer program and all the 911 emergency dispatch calls are answered in‑house. While the department currently meets all the fire protection and emergency service needs of the City, future needs based on the call volume, firefighter overtime and the direct impact on safety will need to be determined.

1

http://www.isogov.com/services/infrastructure/fire-protection.html

Source- http://www.global-pierce.com/category/illinois/page/8/

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Library

Other Community Facilities

The City of Markham is served by Markham Public Library, which is also known as the Bradford/ Anderson/Oglesby Public Library located at 16640 S. Kedzie. It provides books, magazines, records, tapes, video cassettes, movie film, as well as compact discs and recordings for the blind. The library also has a book mobile.

Hospital Services Hospital services for Markham residents are provided

by South Suburban hospital in Hazel Crest, Ingalls Memorial Hospital in Harvey, St. James Hospital at the Olympia Fields campus and MetroSouth Medical Center in Blue Island.

Senior Services The Golden Age Chateau at 15652 S. Homan, provides a variety of activities for seniors. They include bingo, travel, blood pressure screening and much more. The new David Webb Jr. Senior Living Complex along Kedzie Avenue is pictured below.

This facility provides modern apartments with all of the desired amenities for the City’s senior population.

61

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Education Elementary School Districts- The City of Markham is served by Elementary School Districts 143, 143‑5, 144, 147, 152 and 152‑5 which include three elementary schools and one junior high school located in Markham. PrairieHills Junior High recently constructed a new school building. The old building is currently used for administrative offices. Based on the future land use plan, all the school districts serving Markham will be affected by an increase in households with school going children. Based on the enrollment and class sizes in the table below, more students will have an impact on the schools as they already have high numbers.

High School Districts- Thornton Township High School District 205 and Bremen Community High School District 228. Bremen CHSD has over 5,000 students and employees 613 full and part-time employees.

Community College District- South Suburban Community College District 510 Schools

Elementary School Districts Schools

ISAT Scores

Total Enrollment Class Size

Teachers

Student Mobility

English Learners

Instructional Spending

Operational Spending

Midlothian SD 143

43%

1,954

4

132

12%

70%

18%

1%

$5,759

$9,312

Posen-Roddins ESD 143-5

45%

1,809

5

95

20%

89%

10%

24%

$4,634

$9,153

Prairie-Hills ESD 144

40%

2,644

192

22%

91%

14%

4%

$6,524

$12,904

Prairie-Hills Jr. High School

36%

931

23

25%

89%

16%

2%

Markham Park Elem. School

40%

268

23

14%

94%

12%

0%

Harvey-Dixmoor PSD 147

31%

1,394

4

89

42%

81%

13%

14%

$5,705

$12,719

Harvey SD 152

34%

2,299

7

163

27%

98%

10%

4%

$4,996

$11,955

Hazel Crest SD 152-5

39%

999

5 | 18

70

22%

99%

12%

0%

$6,529

$12,865

Robert Frost Middle School

30%

222

17

16%

100%

16%

0%

Ralph J Bunche School

47%

167

18

28%

99%

14%

0%

7 | 21

Table 8.1: Statistics for all the school districts and schools serving Markham

62

Low-Income Students with Students Disabilities

Source-

Information and graphics- Illinois Report Card http://iirc.niu.edu/Default.aspx

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

POSEN Springfield Elementary School

Posen Elementary School

LEGEND

Boundary Municipal Markham Municipal Boundary Markham

Posen Elementary School

Schools Schools Public Library

Martin L King School

Spaulding School

MIDLOTHIAN

150 th Street

150 th Street

Harvey-Dixmoor SD 147

Posen-Roddins SD 143-5 Harvey SD 152

144 Prairie-Hills 152-5 Hazel CrestSD 150 th Street

Harvey SD 152 D ix ie H ig h w a y

Western Avenue

HARVEY

Washington School

150 th Street H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

155 th Street

57

ig h w a y

159 th Street

HARVEY

Washington th Place 156School

Elmer G Kich School Line

D ix ie H

Western Avenue

MARKHAM

McClaughry School

Maya Angelou School 159 th Street

154 th6 Street

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

Riley Preschool

th

155 Street

57 Markham Park MARKHAM Elementary School Prairie Hills Jr. High School

Line

156 Place

163 rd Street

294

Maya Angelou School

Dr Ralph J Bunche School

HARVEY

Center Street

Wood Boulevard

80

Riley Preschool HAZEL CREST

167 th Street Dixie Highway

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

6 Western Avenue

167 th Street

Kedzie Parkway

59

Robert Frost Middle Street 159 thSchool

Park

Anderson Oglesby Public Library

Ave

nue

OAK FOREST

Elmer G Kich School

th

ic Dis trict

McClaughry School

ra E lectr

157 Stre et

Hazel Crest 152-5

154 th Street

157th Street

th

Harvey-Dixmoor SD 147

Beacon Hill

Kedz ie Aven ue

men Community High School

Posen-Roddins SD 143-5

SDSD143 Midlothian 144 Prairie-Hills

Rosa Parks Middle School

Beacon Hill

83

Central Park School Bremen Community High School

Central Park School

83

SD 143D ISTRICTS S CHOOL E LEMENTARYMidlothian

lectri c Dis trict

ine Dis tric tL nd sla kI Ro c M

etr a

43

149 th Street

Rosa Parks Middle School

Kedzie Avenue

149 th Street

Martin L King School

Met

MIDLOTHIAN

Crawfor d Avenue

Spaulding School

Public Library E LEMENTARY S CHOOL D ISTRICTS -

Metr aE

eld ary ol

LEGEND

POSEN

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 8.2: Map showing school districts and schools serving Markham

Markham Park Elementary School

Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc. rd

163 Street

Prairie Hills Jr. High School

63

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Parks and Open Space Markham Park District

Prairies

The residents of Markham have access to a number of parks and recreational facilities managed by the Markham Park District, including 10 parks described in the table on page 65. In addition to the amenities at the existing parks, a community garden is planned at the Radio Station Park located next to the former WBBE Jazz Radio Station. The existing conditions and needs for each park is listed in the table. Based on the survey responses, there is a need for more programs for kids, teens, young adults and seniors. There is also a high demand for walking and biking trails in the community and access to the neighboring forest preserves. This need for connections to recreational amenities is further addressed in the section on Green Infrastructure and Sustainability. For 2012, the Park District had a budget of $521,000, with eight full time and two part time staff. The District has programs for youth, teens and adults, as well as seasonal events and programs.

Markham is indeed the Prairie Capitol of the Prairie State with over 100 acres of virgin prairie. This unique natural resource in actually four Preserves- Sundrop Prairie, Paintbrush Prairie, Dropseed Paririe and GensburgMarkham Prairie. The Gensburg-Markham Prairie is a National Natural Landmark. The Nature Conservancy and Northeastern Illinois University currently operate these four prairies jointly. Multiple partnership options exist between the City, the County’s Forest Preserve District, other regional nature sites and centers, the prairie operators, and area funders to begin to position this unique resource as an important amenity for Markham and the region. These natural areas in and near Markham, such as the Forest Preserve District of Cook County’s Midlothian Meadow, could then be packaged as part of one larger visitor attraction for Markham and its neighbors.

While there are no Cook County Forest Preserves within the City of Markham, the Region 8 preserve is in close proximity to the western boundary of the City. Connections to this trail system and other regional trails will further tap into the recreation the region has to offer.

Source- Markham Park District

64

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

s

s ss

s

Country-Aire Park Roesner & Birch

s ss

s

Donnelly Park Country-Aire & Cypress

s s

Markham Memorial Park 162nd & Kedzie

s ss s

Martin Luther King Park 162nd & Laflin

s

McNeil Park 157th & Trumbull

Soccer Field

Water toys

Multi-purpose Field

Concession Stand

Walking Paths

Current Conditions Baseball Diamonds

Basketball Courts

Tennis Courts

Toddler Play Equipment

Playground

Grills

Picnic Pavillion

Kitchen

Fieldhouse

Gymnasium Bel-Aire Park Lincoln & Parkside

Swings

Park Facilities

Parks

s

s

s ss sss

s 1.0 mi

s s ss s

Drainage issues, rebuild banquet facility. Existing water toy needs replacing. Request football/soccer field. Baseball field requires upgrading.

Park needs topsoil added then leveled. Redesign facility to house a track, skate park for youth, pool and basketball.

s s s s

Design a veteran’s memorial park with fountain, memorial wall, benches, walking path and flags representing the Armed Services. Currently 4 lane road parallel to park.

Flooding issues, no facilities at site. Redesign facility to house private events. Landlocked by City of Harvey.

Peterzak Memorial Park 157th & Kedzie Radio Station Park 158th & Campbell Roesner Memorial Park 160th & Richmond

Trenches in need of maintenance. Picnic tables, playground, swings, toddler toys and basketball courts need to be upgraded to meet current standards Need a Field House, walking path, specific areas for gardening. Parking facility in the rear, fencing. Playground, swings, toddler toys, basketball courts and multi-purpose field need upgrading.

Drainage issues, playground and swings need upgrading, request field house and tables, chairs and bathroom for pavilion. Basketball courts need upgrading.

Upgrade playground, swings, toddler toys, tennis courts, ball diamonds and soccer field.

ss s

Sunshine Park 157th & Millard

s

ss

s ss

6.0 mi

s

s

Expand building to include space for dancing, music, classrooms and programs. Build a greenhouse, baseball and soccer fields, larger parking lot, and outdoor electrical outlets, build modern garage facility.

Upgrade playground, and swings

Table 8.2: Summary of facilities and existing conditions of parks within Markham Park District Source-

Markham Park District

65

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

1.

149 th Street

5.

83

POSEN

LEGEND City of Markham

th

150 Street

Country-Aire Park

150 th Street

Markham Park District Parks

Bel-Aire Park

Cook County Forest Preserve

ig h w a y

Lone Pine Park

D ix ie H

Western Avenue

Crawfo rd Avenu e

Donnelly Park

3.

Prairie/Open Space Conservation Parks outside Markham Stormwater Detention Ponds

HARVEY

Anderson Oglesby Public Library

6.

Markham City Hall Schools with outdoor recreation

154 th Street

Gensburg- Markham Prairie

McNeil Park

Sunshine Park

ine

156 th Place

ict L

Peterzak Memorial Park

Distr

13.

Proposed Nature Center

ctric

Markham Water Tower #2

159 th Street

155 th Street

7.

Dropseed Prairie Nature Preserve

8.

Radio Station Park

6

a Ele

157th Stree t

1. Spaulding School 2. Central Park School 3. Bremen Community High School 4. Beacon Hill School 5. Rosa Parks Middle School 6. Washington School 7. Elmer G Kich School 8. Maya Angelou School 9. Rilay Preschool 10. Dr Ralph J Bunche School 11. Robert Frost Middle School 12. Prairie Hill Jr High School 13. McClaughry School 14. Markham Park Elementary School

57

Paintbrush Prairie Nature Preserve

Metr

ine Di str ict L nd sla kI Ro c etr a M

Neighboring Communities

Kedzie Avenu e

2.

43

Unincorporated Cook County

4.

Sundrop Prairie Nature Preserve

MIDLOTHIAN

159 th Street

Roesner Memorial Park

9.

Martin Luther King Park

MARKHAM Markham Memorial Park

14.

163 rd Street

Markham Boys League Baseball Fields

12.

294

MWRD Stormwater Detention Area

10.

HARVEY

11.

Wood Boulevard

HAZEL CREST

Dixie Highway

80

Western Avenue

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

167 th Street

Center Street

167 th Street

Kedzie Parkway

59

Park

Ave

nue

OAK FOREST

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 8.3: Existing parks and open space map for the City of Markham Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

66

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Environment Wetlands 149 th Street

dD ist ric tL ine lan k Is Ro c etr a M

43

MIDLOTHIAN

500 year flood plain

150 th Street

HARVEY D ix ie H ig hw ay

Western Avenue

154 th Street

159 th Street City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

ectr

Whipple Avenue

ic Dis trict

Line

157 Street

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

155 th Street

57

th

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Met

ra El

COMMUNITY FACILITIES 6

159 th Street

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

MARKHAM

162 nd Street

163 rd Street

OAK FOREST

294

nue Ave 167 th Street

Center Street

HAZEL CREST

Wood Boulevard

80

Dixie Highway

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

Western Avenue

167 th Street

HARVEY

P a rk

California

59

Plymouth

166 th Street

Kedzie Parkway

(Source- http://www.fema.gov/floodplain-management/elevation) *”100-year flood” is the flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. This base flood is the national standard used by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and all Federal agencies for the purposes of requiring the purchase of flood insurance and regulating new development. **Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) is the computed elevation to which floodwater is anticipated to rise during the base flood and is the regulatory requirement for the elevation or floodproofing of structures. The relationship between the BFE and a structure’s elevation determines the flood insurance premium.

LEGEND

100 year flood plain Kedzie Avenue

Water features and floodplains Most of the northern and eastern parts of the City fall within the 100 year and 500 year floodplain, as shown on the adjacent map . Land within the 100-year flood plain* has a 1% annual chance of flooding, while land within the 500-year flood plain has a 0.2% annual chance of flooding. For most of these areas within the floodplain, Base Flood Elevations** have been determined (Zones AE and AH). This means that all new construction and substantial improvements of residential structures within Zones AE and AH must have the lowest floor (including basement) elevated to or above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). Common elevation techniques include elevation on piles, piers or columns, and elevation on extended foundation walls such as on a crawl space.

83

POSEN 150 th Street

Crawford Avenue

The adjacent map shows the location of wetlands within Markham. An environmental study would need to be conducted to determine the quality of these wetlands. Additionally, care will need to be taken when developing these sites to ensure that the wetlands are protected or mitigated as necessary.

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

Figure 8.4: Floodplain map for the City of Markham

Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc., data source- http://www.fema.gov/

67

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Infrastructure Water Distribution System The City of Markham currently receives Lake Michigan water from the City of Chicago via the Midlothian-Markham Water Commission. The City’s main 2 million-gallon reservoir, and connection to the Water Commission’s supply line, is located near the northwest end of the community and near the 156th Street/Crawford Avenue intersection. The City also has an emergency connection for potable water through the City of Harvey near the Wood Street/161st Street intersection. Similarly there is a second emergency cross-connection with the Village of Midlothian along 154th Street and east of Crawford Avenue.

The distribution system within the City includes water mains ranging in size from 4-inch diameter to 12 inches. The distribution system includes over 500 water valves, over 700 fire hydrants and approximately 72 miles of water mains. While the distribution system is generally in good condition, many segments of the water distribution mains are over 50 years old and nearing the end of their design life. This is evident through the number of water main breaks experience over the last several years.

In order to be prepared for the future and potential redevelopment of lands within Markham, the City will need to develop a strategic plan for system upgrades. This strategic plan will also take into account future upgrades to be best prepared for potential disasters that are being defined by the aforementioned Cook County All-Hazards Mitigation Plan. Items to be included in the strategic plan will likely include: • Replacement of undersized water mains (preferred minimum size is 8-inch diameter) • Valve exercise and replacement program to enhance fire protection, reduce unaccounted-for water losses, and be prepared for natural disasters While the water mains are in generally good condition, both water distribution system pump stations are in fair condition and in need of improvements to not only expand their service life, but to again be best prepared for potential natural disasters. While the City does possess a water distribution system atlas, an update to the document will provide several benefits to the City. Modifying the current atlas to a GIS-based system would serve as a beneficial tool in assisting the City with identifying problem areas, prioritizing the problem areas based on the number of residents/business that it will benefit, and in determining project scopes (e.g. analysis, modeling, permitting, etc.) and budgets. In addition, water main infrastructure maintenance records and billing records can be incorporated into a GIS database.

68

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Markham Main Pump Station (156th/Crawford)

Booster Pump Station (161st/Hermitage)

This is the main pump station serving the City and is also the location of the connection to the Midlothian-Markham Water Commission supply line. Located at this station are a 2-million gallon ground storage reservoir and a pump house with three pumps and a back-up pump connected to a natural gas line for emergency service. Recent inspections have revealed several deficiencies in the existing controls and pumps. All control equipment appears to be original from their 1972 installation. The motor control center (MCC) is obsolete and needs to be replaced.

Of the three main pumps, one was found to not be operating and the other two while still operating have exceeded their effective service life. While there is one standby pump, there is no evidence of an emergency back-up power supply. The existing building appears to be in fair condition, with little of any improvements since the original 1972 construction.

In order to be prepared for the future and potential redevelopment of lands within Markham, the City will need to include the following improvements and upgrades to this existing main pump facility in their strategic plan: • Replacement of the Motor Control Center • Inspect and update the existing SCADA system as necessary to conform to the latest available technology as well as to improve the security for the system (some upgrades are already in progress) • Purchase and install a stand-by generator to serve the entire building, including pumps • Remove the entire pump gallery and replace with four, uniformed sized pumps (these upgrades are currently in progress) • Paint the entire interior of the building • Upgrade all entry doors, windows, HVAC system and landscaping • Complete an interior, dive inspection of the ground storage reservoir and schedule any identified deficiencies.

This booster pump station is located in the southeast side of town and is also the location of the emergency/secondary cross-connection to the City of Harvey’s water distribution system. Located at this station are a 1-million gallon ground storage reservoir and a pump house with two pumps. Recent inspections have revealed several deficiencies in the existing controls and pumps. The motor control center (MCC) is obsolete and needs to be replaced. Of the two main pumps, one was found to not be operating and the other pump, while still operating, has exceeded its effective service life. There is no evidence of an emergency back-up power supply. The existing building appears to be in fair condition, with little of any improvements since the original construction. In order to be prepared for the future and potential redevelopment of lands within Markham, the City will need to include the following improvements and upgrades to this booster station pump facility in their strategic plan: • Replacement of the Motor Control Center • Inspect and update the existing SCADA system as necessary to conform to the latest available technology as well as to improve the security for the system (some upgrades are already in progress) • Purchase and install a stand-by generator to serve the entire building, including pumps (these upgrades are currently in progress).

• Remove the entire pump gallery and replace with two, uniformed sized pumps.

• Paint the entire interior of the building.

• Upgrade all entry doors, windows, HVAC system and landscaping.

• Complete an interior, dive inspection of the ground storage reservoir and schedule any identified deficiencies.

As previously described under the stormwater management segment of this plan, the City of Markham is also working as a cooperating partner with the Cook County Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) as they develop a County wide Multi-Jurisdictional All Hazard Mitigation Plan. As provided by the DHSEM, the hazard mitigation plan is the representation of the jurisdictions’ commitment to reduce risks from natural hazards, serving as a guide for decision maker as they commit resources to reducing the effects of natural hazards. These natural disasters include, yet not limited to, tornadoes, natural fires, droughts, and floods. Through participation in this plan, the City ensures their eligibility for future funding of flood mitigation projects through dollars offered through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) drainage related Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). HMGP Funds may also be available for many of the water distribution system improvements.

69

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM The majority of the City of Markham’s sanitary sewer system is a separate sewer area (separate sanitary and storm water systems); with the exception of the portions of the City east of Wood Street which are considered a combined sewer area. This sewer system includes over 1,000 manholes and nearly 50 miles of main-line sewers. All sanitary and combined sewer systems connect to the main interceptor sewers under the control of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD), and who also treats all waste water flows.

There is no evidence of any significant capacity deficiencies within the City’s sanitary sewer system. However, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) is currently developing new mandates that will likely require the MWRD to enforce signification reductions in infiltration/inflow (I&I) for the combined sewer areas. The City needs to develop strategies for the inspection and repairs to the combined sewer areas, and the separation of such sewers as part of new or expanded developments. Tasks that will need to be completed to be prepared for improvement mandates and to also be prepared for future funding opportunities include: • Clean and televise all sanitary sewers to make an assessment of the condition of the sewers; • Smoke test all the sanitary sewers to determine deficiencies that allow inflow and infiltration into the existing system; • Inspect all manholes to determine deficiencies that allow inflow and infiltration into the existing system; and , • Flow monitor all the major basins to quantify the inflow and infiltration and to determine baseline condition of the system.

The City’s sanitary sewer system includes two lift stations; one near the 158th Street/Oakley Avenue intersection and a second located at the 162nd Street/Western Avenue intersection. The are no reported operational problems, but the detailed inspections need to be scheduled; in particular to be prepared for any power outages associated with natural disasters. It is anticipated that the City will need to program the following at each lift station: • Pump replacements • Purchase and installation of stand-by generators • Purchase and installation of new or updated security/alarm systems.

Similar to the existing water distribution system atlas data, while the City does have an atlas, an update to the document will provide several benefits to the City. Modifying the current atlas to a GIS-based system would serve as a beneficial tool in assisting the City with identifying problem areas, prioritizing the problem areas based on the number of residents/business that it will benefit, and in determining project scopes (e.g. analysis, modeling, permitting, etc.) and budgets. Furthermore, documentation of pre-existing inflow/infiltration data that is gathered through the GIS system will allow for comparisons to post-improvement conditions and serve as support for compliance with potential IEPA/MWRDGC mandates.

70

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The primary affects of the flood of 2008 were physical impacts to the City’s infrastructure; including damages to homes and business structures, sewer systems and roadways. Many of these areas have been identified as requiring mitigation assistance. Each area has its own unique stormwater characteristics and issues including undersized sewer systems, faulty sump pump connections, lack of overflow flood routes, poorly maintained sewers and ditches, etc. With these developed areas likely pre-dating stormwater regulations; combined with a lack of routine maintenance on the surface and subsurface stormwater conveyance systems, has resulted in a challenging situation as revealed during the flood of 2008.

To make any improvement to the identified problem areas and determine the actual mitigation needs of the City, additional data collection and analysis will be required. As an initial step the City has worked with the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD) to identify areas of the community that historically have experienced drainage related problems.

The four primary areas of drainage concerns include: • Areas south and east of the I-294 (Illinois Tollway)/159th Street (US Route 6) interchange • Areas west and south of the Central Park Avenue/159th Street intersection • Areas east and west of I-294 along the 155th Street corridor (Bel Aire Creek sub-watershed) • Bel Aire Neighborhood (Park Creek sub-watershed) The MWRD has developed a regional watershed plan for the Little Calumet River Watershed that includes Markham and several other communities within the area.

Adjacent is an excerpt from their report that describes the background and scope of their studies to date:

Background

The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (District) has authority for regional stormwater management within Cook County as granted by the Illinois General Assembly in Public Act 93-1049 (the Act).

The Act requires the District to develop watershed plans for six Cook County watersheds, which include the North Branch of the Chicago River, Lower Des Plaines River, Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Poplar Creek, and Upper Salt Creek. The District published the Cook County Stormwater Management Plan (CCSMP) in February 2007 to identify stormwater management goals and to outline the District’s approach to watershed planning. Chapter 6 of the CCSMP defines the District’s approach and standards for Detailed Watershed Plans (DWPs), which address regional stormwater problems in Cook County. The six major watersheds for which DWPs are being developed cover approximately 730 square miles in Cook County. The primary goals of the DWPs are as follows: • Document stormwater problem areas.

• Evaluate existing watershed conditions using hydrologic and hydraulic (H&H) models.

• Produce flow, stage, frequency, and duration information about flood events along regional waterways.

• Estimate damages associated with regional stormwater problems.

• Evaluate potential solutions to regional stormwater problems.

The Little Calumet River DWP was developed to meet the goals for the Little Calumet River Watershed as described in the CCSMP. The Act required the formation of Watershed Planning Councils (WPCs) to advise the District during development of its county wide stormwater management program; therefore, the DWPs were developed in coordination with the WPCs. Membership of the WPCs consists of the chief elected official of each municipality and township in each watershed, or their designees. Many municipalities and townships were represented by engineers, elected officials, or public works directors. WPC meetings were also open to the public. Frequent coordination with WPCs was performed to ensure that local knowledge is integrated into the DWP and the DWP reflects the communities’ understanding of watershed issues as well as the practicability of proposed solutions.

Detailed Watershed Plan Scope

The scope of the Little Calumet River DWP includes the development of stormwater improvement projects to address regional problem areas along open waterways. Regional problems are defined as problems associated with waterways whose watersheds encompass multiple jurisdictions and drain an area greater than 0.5 square miles. Problems arising from capacity issues on local systems, such as storm sewer systems and minor open channel ditches, even if they drain more than one municipality, were considered local and beyond the scope of this study. Erosion problems addressed in this plan were limited to active erosion along regional waterways that pose an imminent risk to structures or critical infrastructure. Interstate highways, U.S. highways, state routes, county roads with four or more lanes, and smaller roads providing critical access that are impacted by overbank flooding of regional waterways at depths exceeding 0.5 feet were also considered regional problems….”

71

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

( !

“As described in the MWRD report, and based on the information provided by the communities in the Calumet Union CAL UNION DRAINAGE DITCH

LAWNDALE AVE

Drainage Ditch sub-watershed, the Detailed Watershed Plan has identified resolutions/flood mitigation projects within Figure 3.2.11 the City of Markham with a regional watershed focus. Types of projects include installation of floodwalls with erosion ALTERNATIVE protection, channel rehabilitation, culvert retrofits, reservoir expansion, installation of a levee and pumped storage PKCR-G1 area, construction of detention areas and diversion channels. These proposed projects are a great step towardsXY benefiting Markham’s residents and business owners. Copies of the conceptual improvement plans developed by the MWRD for each of the above referenced primary areas of drainage concerns are included on the following pages and cross-referenced below: • MWRDGC Figure 3.2.3 - Areas south and east of the I-294 (Illinois Tollway)/159th Street (US Route 6) k interchange # * • MWRDGC Figure 3.2.4 - Areas west and south of the Central Park Avenue/159th Street intersection ( !

• MWRDGC Figure 3.2.10 - Areas east and west of I-294 along the 155th Street corridor (Bel$+ Aire Creek subFigure 3.2.11 watershed) # * + $ Y ALTERNATIVE X • MWRDGC Figure 3.2.11 - Bel Aire Neighborhood (Park Creek sub-watershed) XY Little Calumet River DWP

151ST ST

Alternative Description:

Construct 200 ac-ft detention facility, implement channel and conveyance improvements from Kedzie AVenue to I-57 and 1000 LF levee between Kedzie Avenue and I-57 Interstate

Conceptual Level Cost: $20,327,000 Benefit: B/C Ratio: $5,187,000 0.26

15 2N

D

ST

MIDLOTHIAN

Candidate Structures for Floodproofing/Acquisition

152ND PL

Regional Problems

" )

Bank Erosion Maintenance

Overbank Flooding

Pavement Flooding

Flooding in Markham

Local Problems

" )

Bank Erosion

Storm Sewer Flow Restriction

River/Stream

PKCR-G1

Y X

Municipalities

LittleFigure Calumet3.2.11 River DWP

Y X

Calumet Union Drainage Ditch

G FIE LD E AV

Maintenance Storm Sewer Flow Restriction

WIL SHIR

Pavement Flooding

TH O RA VE

I-294

XC T

CIRCLE DR

DR

MONTICELLO AVE

TH

SU SS E

OU

STAFFORD AVE

163RD PL

December, 2009

163RD ST

LANCASTER DR

LEAVITT ST

IRVING AVE 162ND ST

PL

152ND PL

D

ST

MIDLOTHIAN

Pavement Candidate Flooding Structures for Floodproofing/Acquisition

152ND PL

Bank Erosion Bank Erosion Maintenance Maintenance Pavement Flooding Overbank Flooding Storm Sewer Flow Restriction Pavement Flooding River/Stream

0

Municipalities Bank Erosion County Boundary Maintenance Project Alternative Location Pavement Flooding 100-year Inundation Area With Project Storm Sewer Flow Restriction 100-year Inundation Area Without Project River/Stream

Municipalities 1 County1Boundary inch = 400 feet

2

¯ ¯

Inches

Y X

+MID13 $

153RD ST

Project Alternative Location

100-year Inundation Area With Project 100-year Inundation Area Without Project 0

December, 2009 1 1 inch = 400 feet

December, 2009

153RD PL

2

$MID13 +

Inches

153RD PL

163RD PL

Figure 8.5: Areas west and south of the Central Park Avenue/159th Street intersection

Source- MWRD Figure 3.2.3

Source- MWRD Figure 3.2.4

CALIFORNIA AVE

Figure 8.4: Areas south and east of the I-294 (Illinois Tollway)/159th Street (US Route 6) interchange LAWNDALE AVE

72

" )

# * + $

TRI-STATE TLWY

¯

1 inch = 400 feet

Inches

New Detention %

TRI-STATE TLWY

2

BERKSHIRE ST

HA ML IN AVE

PL 162ND

1

ST 153RD MIDLOTHIAN

15 2N

Overbank Flooding

153RD ST

Local Problems AV E

Calumet Union Drainage Ditch Southwest

YM PL

Crawford Ave

163RD ST

0

LE

Y X

100-year Inundation Area With Project R UR TE

DA

MARKHAM

E AVE

100-year Inundation Area Without Project ARTH

RN

162ND ST

Municipalities Project Alternative Location

( !

# * # * + $ ( !

Y X + $

MRK9

ARTHUR TER

River/Stream County Boundary

Diversion Conduit %

LA

AVE

OXFOR D DR

Pavement Flooding

# * + $

! ( + $

AV E

PO P

SUSS EX

D

k

Regional Problems Conceptual Level Cost: $20,327,000 " ) Bank Erosion Benefit: # * Maintenance B/C Ratio: $5,187,000 0.26

160TH ST

" ) " )

Y X

MRK1

Y X

LE

ROCKWELL AVE

( !

DA

15 2N

Kedzie AVenue to I-57 and 1000 LF levee December, 2009 betweenCandidate Kedzie Avenue and I-57 Interstate Structures for Floodproofing/Acquisition

k

DGE DR

Overbank Flooding

h

¯

151ST ST

LAWNDALE AVE

IN

CK

VE EA

Maintenance

inag eD itc

$MID13 +

Inches

Local Problems Regional Problems

Local Problems % Channel and Culvert Improvements " ) Bank Erosion

R SP

A BL

ON ST

Bank Erosion

Dra

Little Calumet River DWP 1 inch = 400 feet Y X Conceptual Level Cost: $20,327,000 Alternative Description: Benefit: B/C Ratio: Construct 200 ac-ft detention facility, implement $5,187,000 0.26 channel and conveyance improvements from

MRK6

CAMBRI

AV E SE T N SU

MARKHAM

" )

E

BLACKSTONE AVE

Regional Problems

# * ( ! + $

M AV

et U nion

ALTERNATIVE PKCR-G1

channel100-year and conveyance from Inundationimprovements Area Without Project Kedzie AVenue to I-57 and 1000 LF levee between Kedzie Avenue and I-57 Interstate 0 1 2

151ST ST

LAWNDALE AVE

k

INGHA NOTT

Candidate Structures for Floodproofing/Acquisition

um

EL M

CENTRAL PARK AVE

PY EX YA N

LE

G

VE DA

R

ON

AN

AV E

HM

D

WOOD

Central Park Ave

SH ER

RIC

Conceptual Level Cost: $50,406,000 Benefit: B/C Ratio: $3,377,000 0.07

Cal

WESTERN AVE

ROSE MANOR TER

Construct a 450 ac-ft detention facility and a new diversion conduit from Tri-State Tollway

OAKLEY AVE

CAMPBELL AVE

Little Calumet River DWP Alternative Description:

CLAREMONT AVE

YA N

I-5

W

LE

7

G

D

AN

R

ALTERNATIVE CUDD-G2

Alternative Description: CAL100-year UNION DRAINAGE DITCH Inundation Area With Project Construct 200 ac-ft detention facility, implement

159th Street

159TH ST 160TH ST

CAL UNION DRAINAGE DITCH

ARTESIAN AVE

EX

PY

Figure 3.2.3

Project Alternative Location

BRENNAN HWY

LAWNDALE AVE

SU

E

FRANCISCO AVE

County Boundary

T AV NSE

LAWNDALE AVE

Maintenance

CALPavement UNIONFlooding DRAINAGE DITCH

LAWNDALE AVE

Photo credit- Roger Kessinger

Y X

153RD ST

k

Candidate Structures for Floodproofing/Acquisition

Regional Problems

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

" )

Bank Erosion

# * ( !

Maintenance Overbank Flooding

+ $ City of Markham Comprehensive Plan Pavement Flooding

Local Problems

Bank Erosion Figure 3.2.11 # * Maintenance + $ CALPavement UNIONFlooding DRAINAGE DITCH

" )

SACRAMENTO AVE

! ( + $

Overbank Flooding

k

County Boundary

Belair Creek

Project Alternative Location

155TH ST

1

oject Alternative Location

1 inch = 400 feet

0-year Inundation Area With Project

0-year Inundation Area Without Project 2

¯

MID13

+ $

153RD ST

re ek

D

ix

ie

C

PY EX YA N R KS

ID

E

D

Y X

R

0

XMRK7 Y

153RD PL

December, 2009

# * + $

AF T

ON

2

¯ ¯

Inches

Y X

100-year Inundation Area Without Project

DR

December, 2009 1 1 inch = 400 feet

PY AN

R

YA N

EX

WASHTENAW AVE

WHIPPLE AVE

Municipalities 1

D

157TH ST

2

153RD PL

( !

$M +

Inches

153RD PL

LE

December, 2009

W

Figure 8.6: Areas east and west of I-294 along the 155th Street corridor (Bel Aire Creek sub-watershed)

Figure 8.7: Bel Aire Neighborhood (Park Creek sub-watershed)

Source- MWRD Figure 3.2.10

Source- MWRD Figure 3.2.11

ROCKWELL ST

+M $

100-year Inundation Area With Project

MAGNOLIA DR

ALBANY AVE

TROY AVE

Municipalities Bank Erosion County Boundary Maintenance Project Alternative Location Pavement Flooding 100-year Inundation Area With Project Storm Sewer Flow Restriction 100-year Inundation Area Without Project River/Stream

Project Alternative Location

0

December, 2009

ST

Bank Erosion Bank Erosion Maintenance Maintenance Pavement Flooding Overbank Flooding Storm Sewer Flow Restriction Pavement Flooding River/Stream

County1Boundary inch = 400 feet

G

¯

Inches

Inches

" ) PA R

CAMPBELL AVE

1

1 inch = 400 feet

2

D

MIDLO

Pavement Candidate Flooding Structures for Floodproofing/Acquisition

Local Problems

% Channel Improvements

I-5

0

COUNTRY AIRE DR

ALTA RD

ounty Boundary

Levee D

HEATHER DR

155TH ST

100-year Inundation Area Without Project

unicipalities

%

# * # * + $ ( !

Y X + $

AN

HARVEY

100-year Inundation Area With Project ROCKWELL ST

ver/Stream

%

Conduit

BIRCH RD

155th Street

orm Sewer Flow Restriction

MARKHAM

UNKNOWN

%

Municipalities Diversion

15 2N

Overbank Flooding

LAWNDALE AVE

vement Flooding

Levee

G

Storm Sewer Flow Restriction River/Stream

nk Erosion

MARKHAM

ROESNER DR

LE

Y X

LN

New Detention %

Pavement Flooding

W

Maintenance

AV E

Bank Erosion

" ) " )

Y

" )

# * + $

153RD ST

Park Creek

PL

153RD MIDLO

Local Problems Regional Problems

Pavement Flooding

7

T

roblems

aintenance

New Detention

ST

LAWNDALE AVE

KE

%

MILLARD AVE

vement Flooding

OC

Maintenance

LAWNDALE AVE

CR

# * ( ! + $

Local Problems

ALBANY AVE

nk Erosion

aintenance

verbank Flooding

Bank Erosion

D

k

O

DR

DR

" )

I-294

LN

ON

152ND PL

Regional Problems

CO

AF T

LIN

andidate Structures for oodproofing/Acquisition

al Problems

k

MRK4

¯

151ST

15 2N

Regional Problems Conceptual Level Cost: $20,327,000 " ) Bank Erosion Benefit: # * Maintenance B/C Ratio: $5,187,000 0.26

in ag e

( !

ptual Level Cost: 2,000 t: B/C Ratio: 000 0.17

MIDLOTHIAN

Candidate Structures for Floodproofing/Acquisition

+M $

Inches

Kedzie AVenue to I-57 and 1000 LF levee December, 2009 betweenCandidate Kedzie Avenue and I-57 Interstate Structures for Floodproofing/Acquisition

ra

DR

153RD ST

ST

I-5

E

D

ALTA RD

ID

15 2N

MAPLE LN

KS

Conceptual Level Cost: $20,327,000 Benefit: B/C Ratio: $5,187,000 0.26

CYPRESS RD

Y TLW

PA R

WILLOW LN

ra I-5

7

D

TATE

a levee along Belaire Creek from Afton Avenue, a new 125 ac-ft ea and diversion conduit

151ST

Little Calumet River DWP 1 inch = 400 feet Y X Conceptual Level Cost: $20,327,000 Alternative Description: Benefit:200 ac-ft B/C Ratio: Construct detention facility, implement $5,187,000 0.26 channel and conveyance improvements from

KEDZIE AVE

I-S

tive Description:

ALTERNATIVE PKCR-G1

channel100-year and conveyance from Inundationimprovements Area Without Project Kedzie AVenue to I-57 and 1000 LF levee between Kedzie Avenue and I-57 Interstate 0 1 2

Kedzie Ave

TR

AV E

D

IA

7

LIT ON

ek

CHERRY LN

AN

re

Project Alternative Location

Alternative Description: CAL100-year UNION DRAINAGE DITCH Inundation Area With Project Construct 200 ac-ft detention facility, implement

TR

PY EX PY

YA N

EX

R

7 YA N

D

e

R

e

G

AN

LE

D

W

G

Cr

I-5 W

C

in ag e

rk

CA

Construct 200 ac-ft detention facility, implement channel and conveyance improvements from Kedzie AVenue to I-57 and 1000 LF levee between Kedzie Avenue and I-57 Interstate

Y TLW

Pa

ttle Calumet River DWP

151ST ST

Alternative Description:

TATE

LE

I-S

ALTERNATIVE BLCR-G1

Y X

Y X

County Boundary

151ST ST

Little Calumet River DWP ek

i Dix

ALTERNATIVE PKCR-G1

LittleFigure Calumet3.2.11 River DWP

TR

%

LAWNDALE AVE

Figure 3.2.10

UNION DRAINAGE DITCH

Storm Sewer Flow Restriction

River/Stream

Municipalities

LAWNDALE AVE

ALTERNATIVE PKCR-G1

%

LAWNDALE AVE

LAWNDALE AVE

CAL UNION DRAINAGE DITCH

Y X

CENTRAL PARK AVE

Figure 3.2.11

%

Y X In an effort to continue to work collaboratively with MWRD when it comes Y to stormwater management and flood mitigation, the City of Markham is proposing X to look at drainage improvement projects more on the local level. Within the Markham community, the flood of 2008 weighed heavily on existing infrastructure which now needs extensive repair and even replacement. Based on success with other municipalities in the area, GIS-based utility atlases including existing stormwater systems would serve as a beneficial tool in assisting the City with identifying problem areas, prioritizing the problem areas based on the number of residents/business that it will benefit, and in determining project scopes (e.g. analysis, modeling, permitting…etc.) and budgets.

Y X

Y X

Y X

Types of projects that would be derived from these atlases could range from projects as simple as televising and cleaning an existing storm sewer in a residential area where basement flooding frequently occurs to a more involved project like a complete design and construction of a storm sewer system in an area where none exists.

The City of Markham is also working as a cooperating partner with the Cook County Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) as they develop a Countywide Multi-Jurisdictional All Hazard Mitigation Plan. As provided by the DHSEM, the hazard mitigation plan is the representation of the jurisdictions’ commitment to reduce risks from natural hazards, serving as a guide for decision maker as they commit resources to reducingXYthe effects of natural hazards. These natural disasters include, yet not limited to, tornadoes, natural fires, droughts, and floods. Through participation in this plan, the City ensures their eligibility for future funding of flood mitigation projects through dollars offered through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) drainage related Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). HMGP Funds can be used to make improvements to public or private property; including floodwall systems, building retrofits to minimize damage from flooding, acquisition of flood-prone buildings, or elevating of flood-prone buildings.

73

Section 8 Community Facilities and Infrastructure

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

(This page has been intentionally left blank.)

74

Section 9 Green Infrastructure and Sustainability

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

9 Green Infrastructure and Sustainability Plan With plenty of conserved open space, access to major transportation corridors, and a confined boundary, the City of Markham has the potential to be a model community for sustainable development. In order to understand this potential and recommend strategies to make it a model community, this section addresses key issues related to mobility and walkability (the ability to get to destinations on foot), building a sustainable future, and access to open space and green infrastructure.

1. Affordability, mobility and walkability The Center for Neighborhood Technology defines the Housing + Transportation (H+T) Index as the percent of household income an average household would spend on housing and transportation. The standard threshold for housing costs is 30 percent and 45 percent for housing and transportation costs combined. For Markham, this H+T index is 46.1 percent which is higher than the standard. When looking at the housing and transportation costs individually (Figure 9.2), at 22 percent, housing in Markham is very affordable even compared to the County and CMAP Region, but transportation costs are much higher at 24.1 percent. In addition, as a singlefamily bedroom community, the annual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by Markham households was higher in 2011 than Cook County and the CMAP region (Figure 9.1).

Furthermore, around 78 percent of residents drove alone for their work commutes in 2011, which is a majority of the population. The City has notable assets to build upon, both in strengthening its alternative transportation options and in attracting visitors and new residents to the community.

Achieving a substantial decrease in the City’s vehicle miles traveled will require both a shift in personal trip-taking behavior, as well as an increased commitment to encouraging walkability. By ensuring safe pedestrian access to streets served by existing Pace bus services, residents may choose to take the bus as opposed to driving, thus reducing the vehicle miles traveled per household. In turn, fuel consumption and air pollution will also be decreased, and the quality of life in the community will be improved.

Some of the conditions that encourage walkability include complete sidewalk connections, pedestrian crosswalks, universal design (ensuring accessibility for people of all ages and abilities) and well-lit streets that create a safe environment for pedestrians. In reviewing the existing conditions in Markham (figure 9.3), most of the

14,774

17,571

21,237

Cook County

CMAP Region

Markham

Figure 9.1: Annual Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) per household (2011) Source- CMAP calculations of U.S. Census Bureau and Illinois Secretary of State data

Cook County

$ $ $

+

$

CMAP Region Markham

26.9%

29.3%

22.0%

19.6%

21.5%

24.1%

46.5%

50.8%

46.1%

Figure 9.2: Housing + Transportation costs as a percentage of income per household, 2010 Source- CMAP calculations of Center for Neighborhood Technology data *The purpose of the H+T Index is to isolate the effect of location on housing and transportation costs.

The values above represent the percent of household income an average household in the region would spend on housing and transportation if they lived in this municipality. The standard threshold of affordability is equal to 30 percent for housing costs and 45 percent for housing and transportation costs combined.

75

Section 9 Green Infrastructure and Sustainability

area within a quarter mile convenient walking distance of Pace bus routes have incomplete sidewalks. While it is unrealistic to add sidewalks to every street in the community to improve walkability, ensuring that the streets within a quarter mile distance of existing Pace bus routes have connected sidewalks will encourage residents to use public transportation. Similarly, ensuring that it is convenient and safe to walk to community amenities like parks, schools and commercial areas will encourage residents to travel by foot instead of car, thus contributing to a healthier lifestyle.

In order to improve walkability in Markham, the following strategies are recommended: • Ensure safe pedestrian access to Pace bus shelters and routes • Ensure walkable streets (pedestrian access to neighborhood and community amenities) • Create a bicycle and trails plan for the City (detailed on page 66) • Assess alternate transportation methods, including car sharing • Encourage walkability along commercial uses (The building facades along 159th Street are along the street with parking along the side or rear, which is ideal for a walkable environment. Walkability-related features, such as clear glass storefronts, functional entrances along the street, and limited curb cuts, would help improve walkability.)

2. Building a sustainable future Development pattern Markham’s population is projected to increase over time and providing a variety of housing options is key to ensure that the City can accommodate a variety of household types. As Markham will not be able to expand its municipal boundary considerably to accommodate new development, infill development of vacant parcels and redevelopment will be key.

In order to ensure that future development takes place in a sustainable fashion, the following strategies are recommended• Ensure infill development (in-between vacant parcels) and development of vacant parcels • Create policies and standards for sustainable new development • Ensure diversity in new housing stock, by encouraging townhomes, small-lot single family homes, and mid-size single family homes, for new residential subdivisions. Standards could incorporate flexible bulk regulations that permit a range of housing types, which result in an overall average density of 6 to 12 dwelling units per acre.

76

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Section 9 Green Infrastructure and Sustainability

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

149 th Street

Di str ict Lin e sla nd

Kedzie Avenu e

Ro ck I

City of Markham Boundary City of Markham

43

th

150 Street

P

Metra Station

1/2mile distance from train station

Existing Pace Bus Shelters

1/4mile distance from bus routes

Transit Center/ Park-n-Ride

Incomplete sidewalks within 1/4mile distance from bus routes

Pace Bus Routes

ig h w a y

890

HARVEY

D ix ie H

Western Avenue

Crawfo rd Avenu e

359

Existing Sidewalks

P

th

154 Street 155 th Street

57

157th Stree t

Broadway Avenue

LEGEND

150 th Street

MIDLOTHIAN

M etr a

83

POSEN

H ARVEY M ETRA S TATION

364

Distr

ict L

ine

156 th Place

Metr

a Ele

ctric

159 th Street

773

6

159 th Street

CITY OF MARKHAM

356

163 rd Street

OAK FOREST

294

167 th Street

Center Street

HAZEL CREST

Wood Boulevard

80

Dixie Highway

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

Western Avenue

167 th Street

Kedzie Parkway

59

HARVEY

Park

Ave

nue

354

P

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 9.3: Walkability map for the City of Markham documenting existing conditions Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

77

higher level of insulation and more efficient heating and cooling equipment available today.

Section 9 Green Infrastructure and Sustainability

Energy conservation and efficiency measures

of Markham Comprehensive In order to reduce one’s utility bills, it is City necessary to both reduce the Plan consumption of energy as well as make changes to the house/building that will help it to consume less energy to heat and cool. For example, changing a 100 watt incandescent bulb to a 24 watt compact fluorescent lamp can save an average of $33 annually. Also, the money saved annually often helps offset the initial cost of making such a change.

(AssumptionLampneeds is used 8raise hours per day for 365 days; electricity rate of $0.15/kilowatt-hour) Energy is an integral part of sustainability planning. Rising energy costs and changing energy economic, environmental, and even security concerns that impact local government, businesses, and households. As a large percentage of the housing units in Markham are old, they use more electricity and gas for cooling and heating as compared to houses built after 1990. This is due to various factors like higher level of insulation and more efficient heating and cooling equipment available today. In order to reduce one’s utility bills, it is necessary to both reduce the consumption of energy as well as make changes to the house/building that will help it to consume less energy to heat and cool. For example, changing a 100 watt incandescent bulb to a 24 watt compact fluorescent lamp can save an average of $33 annually. Also, the money annually Theresaved are many suchoften ways to use less electricity and natural gas, and save money annually. For 365 days; electricity rate of $0.15/ helps offset the initial cost of making such a change (Assumption- Lamp is used 8 hours per day for more ways to reduce energy consumption, refer to the Department of Energy’s website (http:/ kilowatt-hour). There are many such ways to use less electricity and natural gas, and save money annuallysavings).

• For examples of more ways to reduce energy consumption, refer to the Department of Energy’s website For businesses and Village owned buildings, the State of Illinois has a program run by the Smart E (http://energy.gov/savings).

Assistance Center (SEDAC) that provides free energy audits to help effectively reduce the use • For businesses and City owned buildings, the State of Illinois has a program buildings. run by theMore Smart Energy on this program can be found in appendix C. information Design Assistance Center (SEDAC) that provides free energy audits to help effectively reduce the use of energy in buildings. More information on this program can be found at - http://smartenergy.illinois.edu/.

• Elevate Energy also implements efficiency programs that lower costs, protect the environment, and ensure the benefits of energy efficiency reach those who need them most. For details about the programs offered, refer to http://www.elevateenergy.org/about/programs-projects/ for more details.

• Green buildings and developments offer significant opportunities for energy savings, as well the conservation of water and resource materials in new buildings. Green building programs (such as those administered by the U.S. Green Building Council and Green Globes U.S.) typically feature a rating system that measures the degree of energy efficiency achieved. Efficient buildings can have financial benefits, especially for lowincome families who may spend up to 20 percent of their income on energy costs.

$$

Addressing the above concerns through energy planning can strengthen economic development by reducing long-term energy costs and lessen environmental impacts by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Specific strategies recommended for Markham are summarized below: • Develop incentives for new buildings and developments per LEEDTM green building standards.

• Reduce energy consumption, energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions by increasing energy efficiency and renewable energy programs. Increase recycling options in public places, and also strengthen the culture Figure 7.5: Graph showing the increase in average prices for electricity in Chicago and the U.S. of recycling, reducing waste, and reusing materials through educational initiatives.

Source- Bureau of Labor Statistics (http://www.bls.gov/ro5/aepchi.htm) • Set standards and develop municipal policies to support renewable energy sources.

Comprehensive Plan 2011

78

flush tanks that use 1.6 gallons per flush, the reduction in water usage is significant. In addition, low-flow shower heads and faucets also help to 7.5 Moving towards sustainability reduce overall water consumption.

In the community surveys, some residents expressed an interest in reducing their utility bills. While residents City of Markham Comprehensive Plan Section 9 Green Infrastructure and • Sustainability Efficient irrigation methodsThecontrol other major source of what domestic cannot the utility rates, they water can control is their overall usage of electricity, gas and water. Small consumption is that used for landscaping.

One way to reduce water usage changes and adjustments can go a long way in saving utilities and money. The sections below focus on water is to use drip irrigation instead of spray irrigation for landscaping as it is and electricity conservation. more efficient and uses comparatively less water. In addition, the use of rain triggered shut-off devices, flow reducers or shut-off valves also Water Developers, policy-makers, and residents encouraged to incorporate sustainable practices into new help to are reduce water usage while ensuring that the plants have sufficient development, redevelopment, and day-to-day activities in the City.

There are a variety of sustainable landscaping Incorporating the following initiatives will help water. Additional methods of water efficient landscaping techniques are reduce the overall water practices, streetscape designs, and construction listed below that can used to support consumption andbethus reduce watersustainability billsincluded intechniques appendix B.

Chapter 12 | Sustainability

within Markham whileSpreaders reducing stormwater flooding issues.

Level

•

Domestic water usage- As More than 80% of the houses in Glenwood were built before 1980, many of them still use flush tanks that use 2 to 4 gallons of water per flush. If these are replaced with dual-flush or lowWater conservation efficiency measures To assistand with bioswales and naturalized detention, level flush tanks that use 1.6 gallons per flush, the reduction in water usage is significant.

In addition, low-flow The City should help educate residents on the following initiatives to help reduce the overall water consumption. spreaders can be utilized. Level spreaders collect andshower heads and faucets also help to reduce overall water consumption.

Brochures and information on these initiatives can be distributed along with resident’s water bills-

evenly disperse stormwater into bioswales and • Domestic water usageAs 76% of the housing units runoff in Markham were irrigation built beforemethods1970, many themmajor still source of domestic water • Efficient The of other

consumption is that used for landscaping.

One way to reduce water usage other detention facilities. use flush tanks naturalized that use 2 to 4 gallons of water per flush. If these are replaced with dual-flush or lowflush is to use drip irrigation instead of spray irrigation for landscaping as it is tanks that use 1.6 gallons per flush, the reduction in water usage is significant. In addition, low-flow shower more efficient and uses comparatively less water.

In addition, the use heads and faucets also help to reduce overall water consumption.

Recycled Construction Materials of rain triggered shut-off devices, flow reducersVillage or shut-off valves alsoIllinois 7-10 of Glenwood, • Efficient irrigation methods- The other major source of help domestic water consumption is that used to reduce water usage while ensuring that the plants have sufficient for landscaping. One way to reduce water usage is to use drip irrigation instead of spray irrigation forlandscaping techniques are water.

Additional methods of water efficient landscaping as it ispossible, more efficientthe and uses lessincluded water.

Ininaddition, the use of rain triggered Where usecomparatively of recycled materials is strongly appendix B. Level Spreader shut-offencouraged. devices, flow reducers or shut-off valves also help to reduce water usage while ensuring that the Pre-consumer and post-consumer content plants have sufficient water. Additional methods of water efficient landscaping techniques are included below- can incorporated into building materials, site amenities, paving, and various finishes.

• Naturalized DetentionA naturalized detention area temporarily collects and stores stormwater runoff in a ‘wetland’ type area. It is then released at a slow and controlled rate to allow it to infiltrate into the ground. These areas are planted with native wetland plantings that can tolerate severe wet Green Roof and dry conditions.

• Native Landscaping- The use of native grasses, forbs, shrubs, and trees should be strongly Vegetated roofs can with the energy costs considered.

Native species canassist withstand a widereducing range of temperature extremes, use less water, require less maintenance, and use less fertilizers. 7-10 Village of Glenwood, Illinois of heating and cooling buildings.

In addition, green roofs • Efficient IrrigationEfforts should be undertaken to reduce the amount of irrigation that is needed help to reduce urban heat islands, reduce the rate and on-site. Native plant materials should be planted that require little irrigation. Other ways to be efficient quantity stormwater and flow provide with irrigation isofto utilize rain-triggeredrunoff, shut-off devices, reducers,unique head layoutand that only sprays in softscape spaces, and the use ofaccessible drip irrigation systems. sometimes pedestrian outdoor spaces. Green • Level To assist with bioswales and naturalized detention,structural level spreaders can be roofsSpreadersrequire waterproofing, sub-roof drainage, utilized. Level spreaders collect and evenly disperse stormwater runoff into bioswales and other soil, and native plantings. naturalized detention facilities.

• Recycled Construction Materials- Where possible, the use of recycled materials is strongly Permeable Pavingand post-consumer content can incorporated into building materials, site encouraged.

Pre-consumer Green Roof amenities, paving, and various finishes.

Various paving products exist that allow stormwater to infiltrate through the pavement and infiltrate the soil

79

below. Various options include permeable concrete, permeable pavers, reinforced gravel and grass Section 9 Green Infrastructureprecast and Sustainability paving, and permeable asphalt. The benefits of permeable paving is the reduction in on site storm sewer capacity, the recharging of underground water supplies, and the • Green Roof-out Vegetated roofs can assist reducing the energy costs of heating and cooling filtering of pollutants andwithother debris.

buildings. In addition, green roofs help to reduce urban heat islands, reduce the rate and quantity of stormwater runoff, and provide unique and sometimes pedestrian accessible outdoor spaces. Green High Albedo Paving roofs require waterproofing, sub-roof drainage, structural soil, and native plantings.

• Permeable Paving- Various paving products exist that allow stormwater to infiltrate through the pavement and infiltrate the soil below. Various options include permeable concrete, permeable Light colored pavement can be utilized to reflect sunlight precast pavers, reinforced gravel and grass paving, and permeable asphalt. The benefits of away from areas. willsewer help reduce the urban permeable paving paved is the reduction in onThis site storm capacity, the recharging of underground water andeffect, the filteringallows out of pollutants and other debris. heatsupplies, island vegetation to thrive, and cuts • High Albedo colored pavement can be utilized to reflect sunlight away from paved down onPavingthe Light amount of irrigation required in high areas. This will help reduce the urban heat island effect, allows vegetation to thrive, and cuts down pavement areas. on the amount of irrigation required in high pavement areas.

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Pervious Pavement

3. Open Space and Green Infrastructure Providing access to open space for recreation, and designing green infrastructure for stormwater management help mitigate flooding issues, besides adding to the quality of life of the community. Given the large amount of 12-3 conserved open space in Markham, ensuring that these prairies and parks are accessible from the community is key. In addition, promotion of Markham’s prairies, development of a Visitor/Nature Center and way-finding signage for the prairie nature preserves are encouraged to promote this asset. Currently, there are no bicycle routes through the City connecting these amenities to the surrounding community. Creating a Trail Plan as outlined on page XX for bicycle and pedestrian access within the community will encourage residents and visitors to use these community amenities.

In addition, Markham has a few drainage channels (shown on the land use map on page XX) through out the community that have the potential of being converted in to green corridors for stormwater management, trails and habitats for native ecosystems. Naturalizing these drainage channels with bioswales will help with natural filtering and collection of stormwater. Bioswales are landscaped channels that provide treatment and retention as stormwater is directed from one location to another. Landscape materials may include vegetation, xeriscape, or a combination of both. Landscaped swales slow, infiltrate and filter runoff. Bioswales are particularly effective along roadway corridors and parking areas as they intercept runoff from the pavement, reducing stormwater capacity that is eventually deposited into the sewer system. It is recommended that Markham incorporate bioswales along the greenways shown on the Green Infrastructure Plan (Figure XX) as per the considerations below:

Agency Coordination • Areas located within state controlled Rights of Way will require permitting through the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT)

• IDOT may require a maintenance agreement confirming that the municipality will maintain these areas.

80

Dolton Comprehensive Plan January 2013

Section 9 Green Infrastructure and Sustainability

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

1.

149 th Street

5.

83

POSEN

LEGEND City of Markham

th

150 Street

Country-Aire Park

D ix ie H ig h w a y

Bel-Aire Park

Parks outside Markham Stormwater Detention Ponds

HARVEY

Anderson Oglesby Public Library

6.

Markham City Hall On-street bike lanes

th

154 Street

ict L

Distr

8.

Radio Station Park

159 th Street

Irving Avenue

Central Park Ave

e

Martin Luther King Park

mon

Dr 166 th Street

294

MWRD Stormwater Detention Area

11.

Wood Boulevard

HAZEL CREST

167 th Street

Dixie Highway

Western Avenue

80

HARVEY

Center Street

167 th Street

COUNTRY CLUB HILLS

10.

165 th Street

nue

ine

12.

Ave

pla

Kedzie Parkway

lle

Proposed

Rich

163 rd Street

9.

d Av

MARKHAM

Markham Memorial Park

59

6 Roesner Memorial Park

Be

ine

156 th Place

ctric

en Br ge or

McNeil Park

14.

1. Spaulding School 2. Central Park School 3. Bremen Community High School 4. Beacon Hill School 5. Rosa Parks Middle School 6. Washington School 7. Elmer G Kich School 8. Maya Angelou School 9. Rilay Preschool 10. Dr Ralph J Bunche School 11. Robert Frost Middle School 12. Prairie Hill Jr High School 13. McClaughry School 14. Markham Park Elementary School a Ele

y gw nH na

Gensburg- Markham Prairie

Proposed Nature Center

OAK FOREST

Schools with outdoor recreation

7.

Dropseed Prairie Nature Preserve

Peterzak Memorial Park

Sunshine Park

155 th Street

Metr

157 th Street

Off-street/shoulder bike paths

Proposed

13. 157 th Street

Ge

Markham Water Tower #2

57

Paintbrush Prairie Nature Preserve

Ridgewa y Ave

155 th Street

159 th Street

Donnelly Park

Lone Pine Park

Cook County Forest Preserve

Prairie/Open Space Conservation Markham Park District Parks

Western Avenue

Crawfo rd Avenu e

Roes ner Dr

3.

Neighboring Communities 150 th Street

Park

ct Lin e Isl an dD ist ri Ro ck M etr a

2.

43

Unincorporated Cook County

4.

Proposed

Kedzie Avenu e

Sundrop Prairie Nature Preserve

MIDLOTHIAN

H AZEL C REST M ETRA S TATION

Figure 9.4: Green Infrastructure Plan for the City of Markham Prepared by- Teska Associates, inc.

81

Section 9 Green Infrastructure and Sustainability

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Design • The bioswale should follow the topography of natural drainageways. Underdrainage may be required to prevent standing water for excess periods of time.

• Consider potential conflicts, such as driveways, where culverts may be required to direct stormwater to a final

outlet.

• Bioswale layers typically consist of sub base preparation, aggregate base, filter fabric, soil mixture and plantings. These elements should all be specifically designed to meet the physical conditions of the swale area.

• Landscape materials should be selected so as not to impede visibility by motorists. Generally, plantings should not exceed 3’-0” ht at full maturity when measured from the top of roadway grade. Additional clearances are required at roadway intersections.

• Landscape materials should be selected for their tolerance to deicing salt and urban conditions.

Maintenance • Maintenance will require watering and weeding during establishment, replenishing of mulch, and periodic mowings during the growing season.

Education • Educational elements such as signage and outreach programs will help educate the public about the functions and benefits of the bioswale.

Landscape solutions that may be applied to naturalized drainageways in Markham include: • Rain Gardens- A planted depression that allows stormwater runoff to be absorbed by the ground. These may be applied to modest size areas, such as parking lots and homes, to minimize the amount of stormwater runoff entering the channels.

• Bioswales- Linear landscape features that are designed to filter and slow stormwater runoff. This includes a drainage course with landscaped side slopes. Where feasible, portions of drainageways may be converted to naturalized landscape swales to maximize stormwater filtration and recharge into the ground, before reaching the sewer system.

• Filter Strips- A long and linear vegetated buffer strip that slows the rate of stormwater runoff. Where topography and land area is available, filter strips may be incorporated to slow and filter runoff before it enters the open drainage channel system.

• Slope Stabilization / coir rolls- When slopes are planted and intended to be periodically mown, slopes should not exceed 3:1. When vegetated slopes must exceed 3:1, alternative control measures may be taken, such as coir rolls.

Coir rolls are natural fiber rolls, typically comprised of coconut fibers, that may be used to create a terraced slope.

• Native Plantings- Plant species should be selected based on function, soil type, topography, cost and maintenance requirements. When installing plantings on a slope, especially when soils fluctuate between saturated and dry, containerized plantings or plugs are recommended. Seed mixtures may be applied so long as they are treated with appropriate mulch stabilizers.

82

Examples of naturalized stormwater management

Section 9 Green Infrastructure and Sustainability

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

In summary, below are the recommended strategies to improve stormwater management and conservation and promotion of Markham’s natural assets: • Promote the use of native plantings for all new developments • Promote water efficiency and reuse.

• Educate the public about the importance of water and water conservation techniques.

• Naturalize drainage channels • Provide access to conserved open space by sidewalks, trails and bikepaths • Provide bike racks at all schools and commercial establishments • Create a Visitor Center and way-finding signage for the Prairie nature preserves to promote this asset

83

Section 9 Green Infrastructure and Sustainability

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

(This page has been intentionally left blank.)

84

Section 10 Urban Design

10

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Urban Design Analysis In order to recommend improvements to the City from an urban design point of view, a few key features were identified that encourage walkability and create a sense of place. While the City does have active commercial corridors, it does not have a downtown area like most suburban communities.

Hence, addressing these issues will help improve the character of the community-

• Signage- While there is signage along some major • Sidewalks and lighting- Recent developments and intersections, a more integrated signage program most of the residential neighborhoods to the south of is recommended for the city, especially along major 159th and east of Kezie have sidewalks, but they are corridors. missing for the rest of the community. Street lighting is also insufficient and needs to be improved to make neighborhoods safe.

• Curb cuts- There are also a large number of curb cuts along major arterial roads to provide access to existing businesses along the street.

• Curb and gutter- Most of the residential streets in Markham are without curb and gutter, and instead have swales for storm water drainage on either side of the roadway.

85

Section 10 Urban Design

Anointed Word (Church)

State Farm Insurance

Family Auto Dollar Repair

Citgo Gas

Cash 4 Gold Allstate Insurance

Auto Repair

WALGREEN’S

SBT Bank

VFW

Pedestrian Access Across I-57

Whipple Ave

Albany Ave

Troy Ave

Kedzie Ave

Sawyer Ave

Spaulding Ave

Turner Ave

Homan Ave

Trumbull Ave

St. Louis Ave Hi-Way The Magical Touch Motel

Clark Gas Station

159th St

LEGEND

Clifton Park Ave

I-5 7

Central Park Ave

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Popeye’s

Comfort Inn & Suites

Brennan Hwy

Auto-Dealer

McDonald’s

159th St

159th St Envy’s Auto Pub Repair

L&G Family Restaurant Marathon Gas Station

A

Angler’s Outlet

White Castle

B

Animal Hospital

Olander Florist

Chef’s Quality Meats

BBQ

Oladiji’s Day Care

Town Center

Burger King

Dunkin Donuts/ Baskin Robbins

Taco Bell

Cash Loans

Dry Cleaning

Aaron’s/ Ashley Stewart

U-Haul

Victory Christian Assembly Church

Continuous Sidewalk

Car Wash

Landscaped Medians

Title Loans

Streetscape Plantings: Street trees & Grass parkway

Ave

Auto Zone

ROESNER PARK

d mon

Auto Service

Rich

CANTERBURY SHOPPING CENTER

160th St

Character Street Lighting Sherwood Ave

Sculpture Park-Boulevard 161st St Nottingham Ave

Enhanced Pedestrian Intersections Sussex Ave

162nd St

Pestrian Crossing Sign with Rapid Flash Beacon

Wilshire Ave

Stafford Ave

MARKHAM PARK SCHOOL

Opportunity for Gateway and Wayfinding Signage

163rd St

(Old Junior High School Building)

PRAIRIE HILLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Limit Curb Cuts Exisiting Alley Kedzie Ave

Civic Corridor

164th St

Existing Traffic Signal

POLICE DEPARTMENT/ CITY HALL

Proposed Alley CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY SIXTH MUNICIPAL DISTRICT

Exisiting Side Street Parking Pocket

165th St EXPRESS GLOBAL

Proposed Side Street Parking Pocket

The Children’s House Day Care

166th St

U-Haul Self Storage

LIBRARY

Speedway Gas Station

Existing Pace Bus Stop with Shelter Existing Pace Bus Stop Existing Pace Bus Stop- Proposed Shelter

167th St Wonder Bread

Auto Dealer

Section Line

Markham Comprehensive Plan Urban Design Framework: Overall Plan 86

Section 10 Urban Design

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Urban Design Framework Plan The Urban Design Framework for Markham’s Comprehensive Plan has two main areas of focus: the Town Center --the corridor of 159th St between Central Park Ave and Kedzie Ave-- and the Civic corridor –Kedzie Avenue between 163rd Street and 167th Street.

In the Town Center the urban design framework calls for: • A new 6’ walk along the south side of the street and maintaining the continuous sidewalk on the north side of the street.

• Landscaped parkway between sidewalk and curb, removing any existing pavement within the ROW. Street trees to be Morton Euclid Plane Trees.

• Landscaped medians to replace existing 22’ wide concrete medians between Spaulding Ave. and Kedzie Ave. • Character street lighting with lamps at both traffic and pedestrian heights. The design of the street light to compliment the new construction/ modern architectural style of major civic buildings in Markham such as the City Hall-Police Department Building and the new Prairie Hills Junior High School Building. Street light pole to include banner brackets with also the option for flag posts. Luminaries at pedestrian height to be indirect-lighting elements—which reduce glare and light pollution.

• Enhanced pedestrian intersections at Central Park Ave and Kedzie Ave • To further promote pedestrian comfort is it recommended to limit curb cuts along 159th street, using an alley system and side streets for access and parking.

• Community Identity-Gateway signage opportunity where the I-57 off ramp mergers with 159th Street.

• Community Identity and Wayfinding signage opportunity within the Landscape Median at Spaulding Ave. • A Bus Shelter for the existing Pace Route 364 westbound stop at Kedzie and 159th.

Along the Civic Corridor the Urban Design framework calls for: • A sculpture-park along the boulevard between Kedzie Ave and Kedzie Parkway.

• Character street lighting.

• Bus Shelters for existing Pace Route 359 stops at 163rd Ave for access to City Hall, 165th Ave for access to the Circuit Court of Cook County and 167th Ave for the Markham Library.

• Enhanced pedestrian intersections at 163rd, 165th and 167th avenues with a Rapid Flash Beacon for pedestrian safety at 165th Ave. • Enhanced Gateway treatment at 167th and Kedzie Avenue with parkway street tree planting.

• New sidewalk to create continuous route along east side of Kedzie Ave Furthermore the design framework calls for: • Character lighting along Central Park avenue between 159th and Markham Park School, along 163rd between Markham Park School and Prairie Hills Junior High School and along Richmond Ave between Prairie Hills Junior High School and 159th Street.

• Gateway treatment where I-294 south bound off ramp mergers with 159th St. • Rapid Flash Beacon sign for pedestrian crossing at Whipple Ave and 159th Street, for people crossing from McDonald’s and Popeyes’ to Canterbury Shopping Center.

• Enhanced pedestrian safety at corner of 163rd and Richmond Ave for safe walks to Prairie Hills Junior High School.

• Enhanced pedestrian intersections to connect Roesner Park with Canterbury Shopping Center and neighborhood sidewalks.

• A safe walking route across the 159th Street bridge over I-57.

87

Section 10 Urban Design

Auto Repair Auto Repair

Gas Clark Station Gas Station

Envy’s Auto Pub Repair Envy’s Pub RepairEnvy’s

Auto Pub Repair

L&G Family Restaurant

LEGEND

(Church)

A

Outlet

Florist

BBQ

Oladiji’s Day Care

Oladiji’s Care

Oladiji’s Day Care

C

PedestrianPedestrian Access AcrossAccess I-57 Across I-57 Continuous Sidewalk

White Castle White Castle Dry Cleaning Dry Cleaning Title Loans Title Loans

Limit Curb Cuts

Enhanced Pedestrian Intersections

Exisiting Alley

Enhanced Pedestrian Intersections

Continuous Sidewalk

Continuous Sidewalk Landscaped Medians

Continuous Sidewalk

Landscaped Medians

Streetscape Plantings: Medians Landscaped Street trees & Grass parkway Streetscape Plantings: Landscaped Medians Street trees & Grass parkway Character Street Lighting Character Streetscape Street LightingPlantings:

Pestrian Crossing Sign with Rapid Flash Beacon

Enhanced Pedestrian Intersections

Pestrian Crossing Sign with Rapid Flash Beacon

Pestrian Crossing Sign with Rapid Flash Beacon

Opportunity for Gateway and Wayfinding Signage

Pestrian CrossingSignage Sign with Rapid Flash Beacon Opportunity for Gateway and Wayfinding Existing Traffic Signal

Street trees & Grass parkway

Street Lighting Sculpture Character Park-Boulevard

Character Street Lighting

Limit Curb Cuts

Exisiting Alley

Proposed Alley Proposed Alley

Exisiting Side Street Parking Pocket

Existing Traffic Signal Opportunity for Gateway and Wayfinding Signage

Existing Traffic Signal Existing Traffic Signal

Exisiting Side Street Parking Pocket

Proposed Alley

Existing Pace Bus Stop with Shelter

Existing Pace Bus Stop

Existing Pace Bus Stop- Proposed Shelter

Existing Pace Bus Stop- Proposed Shelter Section Line

Exisiting Side Street Parking Section PocketLine

Proposed Side Street Parking Pocket Exisiting Side Street Parking Pocket

Proposed Side Street Parking Pocket

Section Line

Section Line

Proposed Side Street Parking Pocket

Vacant Parcels

Sculpture Park-Boulevard Sculpture Park-Boulevard Markham Comprehensive Plan Markham Comprehensive Plan Urban Design Framework | Town Center- 159th Street Urban Design Framework | Town Center- 159th Street

ExhibitMarkham 2: 159th Street Town CenterPlan Plan (Urban Design Framework Plan) Comprehensive

Markham Comprehensive Plan Design Framework | Town Center- 159th Street UrbanUrban Design Framework | Town Center- 159th Street

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

(Last Updated on 02 24 2014)

160th St

Existing Pace Bus Stop- Proposed Shelter

Proposed Alley

Kedzie Ave

Title Loans

Existing Pace Bus Stop Existing Pace Bus Stop- Proposed Shelter Existing Pace Bus StopExisting with Shelter Pace Bus Stop

Exisiting Alley

Opportunity for Gateway and Wayfinding Signage Proposed Side Street Parking Pocket

Street trees & Grass parkway Streetscape Plantings:

Sculpture Park-Boulevard

Exisiting Alley

Existing Pace Bus Stop with Shelter Existing Pace Bus Stop

Prepared by the consultant team of:

White Castle

Ta TaB B

Dry Cleaning

Existing Pace Bus Stop with Shelter

Limit Curb Cuts

TroyTroy AveAve

Burger King Burger King

Troy Ave

Kedzie Ave Troy Ave

WALGREEN’S

VFW

WALGREEN’S

VFW

C

160th St

Limit Curb Cuts Enhanced Pedestrian Intersections

Pedestrian Access Across I-57

88

Sawyer Ave

Kedzie Kedzie AveAve

WALGREEN’S

160th St 160th St Pedestrian Access Across I-57

Cash 4 Gold Allstate Insurance

Cash 4WALGREEN’S Gold Allstate Insurance

Allstate Insurance VFW VFW

C C

Sawyer Ave

Spaulding Ave

Turner Ave

Cash 4 Gold

159th St

BBQ

Citgo Gas

Citgo Gas Allstate Cash Insurance 4 Gold

Farm Insurance

Chef’s Quality Oladiji’s Meats Day

Day Chef’s Care Quality Meats

State Farm Insurance

Citgo Gas Citgo Gas State

159th St

Sawyer Sawyer AveAve

State Farm

State Family Auto Insurance Farm Dollar Repair Insurance

Spaulding Ave

Family Auto Dollar Repair

B St 159th 159th St

Hospital

Spaulding Spaulding Turner AveAveAve

Turner Turner Ave Ave Homan Ave

Family Auto Dollar Repair Family Auto DollarAnointed Repair Word

Homan Ave

Trumbull Ave Anointed Word (Church)

A B L&G B FamilyL&G Restaurant MarathonA Angler’s Animal Olander A Family Restaurant Gas L&G Outlet HospitalBChef’s Florist Marathon Angler’s Animal Olander Family Restaurant BBQ Station Gas Quality Marathon Outlet Hospital Florist Angler’s Animal Olander Chef’s BBQ Station Meats Gas Quality Outlet Hospital Florist Marathon Angler’s Animal Olander Station Meats Gas

Station

LEGEND LEGEND LEGEND

Anointed

Homan Homan AveAve

Hi-Way The Magical

Word Motel TheTouch Magical Anointed The Magical ClarkHi-Way (Church) TouchHi-Way Word Touch(Church) Gas Motel Motel Station

Trumbull Ave

Hi-Way The Magical Touch Motel

St. Louis Ave

Clark Gas Station

Auto Repair

Envy’s Auto Pub Repair Auto

Trumbull Trumbull AveAveSt. Louis Ave

St. St. Louis Louis AveAve

Clifton Park AveClifton Park Ave

Clifton Clifton ParkPark AveAve

Clark Auto Repair

Central Park Ave Central Park Ave

Central Central ParkPark AveAve

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

White Castle Burger Dry KingCleaning

Title Loans

Burger King Ta B

Section 10 Urban Design

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan New Character Street Lights Landscaped Parkway

Landscaped Parkway: Grass and Street Trees Proposed 8’ Multiuse Path on North Side of 159th Street Propose Raised Landscaped Beds at Base of Business Signs

New 6’ Sidewalk on South Side of 159th St Proposed Raised Planting Beds at Base of Business Signs

The Magical Touch

Angler’s Outlet Parking

Section A :159th Street at St. Louis Avenue (Option with an 8’ wide multi-use path on the north) New Character Street Lights New Sidewalk Landscaped Parkway (Replace Existing Asphalt or Concrete with Grass and Street Trees)

Proposed Raised Planting Beds at Store Fronts

Anointed Word

Olander Florist

Section B :159th Street at Trumbull Avenue Landscaped Median with Wayfinding Signage New Side Walk Proposed Raised Planting Beds at Store Fronts

89

(Old Junior High School Building)

Section 10 Urban Design

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan Kedzie Ave

164th St

Stafford Ave CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY SIXTH MUNICIPAL DISTRICT

165th St

163rd St

EXPRESS G

POLICE DEPARTMENT/ CITY HALL (Old Junior High School Building)

PRAIRIE HILLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

The Children’s House Day Care

166th St

164th St Kedzie Ave

U-Haul Self Storage

LIBRARY

CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY SIXTH MUNICIPAL DISTRICT

Speedway Gas Station

167th St

165th St

Wonder Bread

EXPRESS GLOBAL

Auto Dealer

LEGEND Pedestrian Access Across I-57 Opportunity for Gateway and Wayfinding Signage

Existing Traffic Signal Landscaped Medians

The Children’s House Day Care

166th St

U-Haul Self Storage

Exisiting Alley

Character Street Lighting

Proposed Alley

Enhanced Pedestrian Intersections

LIBRARY

Auto Dealer

Pedestrian Access Across I-57 Opportunity for Gateway and Wayfinding Signage Continuous Sidewalk

Proposed Side Street Parking Pocket

Markham Comprehensive Plan Urban Design Framework | Civic Corridor- Kedzie Ave

LEGEND 90

Exisiting Side Street Parking Pocket

Pestrian Crossing Sign with Rapid Flash Beacon

Speedway Gas Station

167th St Wonder Bread

Limit Curb Cuts

Streetscape Plantings: Street trees & Grass parkway

Sculpture Park-Boulevard

Existing Pace Bus Stop with Shelter Existing Pace Bus Stop

Existing Pace Bus Stop with Shelter Existing Pace Bus Stop

Continuous Sidewalk

Existing Pace Bus Stop- Proposed Shelter

Section 10 Urban Design

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Section B Landscaped Median with Wayfinding Signage New Side Walk Proposed Raised Planting Beds at Store Fronts

Infill Development

City Hall Library

Infill Development

Canterbury Mall • City of Markham •

Section C :159th Street at Spaulding Avenue

Barrier with rail at 42” ht New 6’ Walk

Section D: 159th Street Bridge over I-57

Reduce drive lanes to 11’

91

Section 10 Urban Design

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Core Ten Steel Pole Mounted Sign

M A R K H A M

12'

Parkway

City Hall

Brushed Aluminum Raised Letters Landscaped Parkway 12” Concrete Base

Signs: Laser cut Corten Steel with Raised Aluminum Lettering

Sidewalk

Core Ten Steel Pole Mounted Sign

Library Canterbury Mall • City of Markham •

Sculpture Park/Boulevard

Gateway and Wayfinding Signage 92

Section 10 Urban Design

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Gateway and Wayfinding Signage

Indirect-Lighting Lumineers

Banner Brackets

Character Street Lighting

Markham Comprehensive Plan Urban Design Framework | Design Elements

Landscaped Parkway Street Trees Morton Euclid Plane Tree 93 January 31, 2014

Section 10 Urban Design

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

(This page has been intentionally left blank.)

94

Section 11 Implementation Plan

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

11 Implementation Plan The following strategies are designed to serve as a starting point when prioritizing implementation of recommendations outlined in this plan. Other than the introduction and community profile, each section in this plan has corresponding implementation strategies. This section is a guideline and may be modified as more specific developments and projects are planned.

Plan Monitoring and Updates This Comprehensive Plan is based on currently available data regarding community conditions, development trends, and an understanding of local issues. Over time, certain conditions or events may alter the information and recommendations in this document. As a result, this Comprehensive Plan should be reviewed and updated periodically.

This Implementation section should be reviewed annually by the City staff and the Zoning Board/ Plan Commission and updated as appropriate. Specifically, completed projects and action steps should be crossed off the list to signify progress. New projects may be added as community issues arise.

The Future Land Use Plan and Transportation Plan should be reviewed at least once every three years by the City staff and Zoning Board/Plan Commission. The entire Comprehensive Plan should be reviewed with appropriate amendments at least once every five years. This will ensure that the plan is an effective tool in guiding development in Markham.

95

Section 11 Implementation Plan

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Funding Sources Property taxes and sales taxes are the most common funding sources to support operations and improvements within a municipality. However, there are several other channels which provide partial or complete funding for certain projects and improvements. The following is a summary of these potential funding opportunities that the City may explore:

Tax Increment Financing (TIF)

TIF is a valuable tool to promote a public/private partnership that has been effectively used in many communities throughout Illinois to encourage private development.

Markham has experience using this technique, as there are four existing TIFs within the City. The Comprehensive Plan recommends exploration of a few TIF along 159th Street between Crawford Avenue and Kedzie Avenue.

Government Grant Programs

Public/Non-Profit Partnership

A public/non-profit partnership allows a public agency to utilize the specialized knowledge and resources of a non-profit organization (The Nature Conservancy, for example). Non-profit organizations can offer expertise without being paid by the public agency. These partnerships can be a fiscally efficient way to initiate programs within the City. This type of partnership could be ideal for development of a Nature Center for the Markham Prairie which could serve a variety of community needs including the promotion of tourism, and meeting/event space.

Certain federal, state, and local governmental grant programs relevant to Markham include the following: Open Space Lands Acquisition and Development (OSLAD) OSLAD is a state financed grant program that provides funding assistance to local government agencies. The funds may be used to acquire and/or develop land for public parks and open space. Projects can vary between small public parks to large community and nature areas. The program is financed by a percentage of the State’s Real Estate Transfer Tax. For information visit: www.dnr.state.il.us/ocd/newoslad1.htm Park and Recreation Facility Construction Act (PARC) PARC was created to provide grants to eligible local governments for park and recreation unit construction projects within the State of Illinois. The funds may be used for land acquisition, development, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and other improvements to new or existing recreational areas. It is important to note that permanent funding for the program has not yet been established, unlike the OSLAD program (above).

For information visit: www.dnr.state.il.us/ocd/newparc1.htm Illinois Transportation Enhancement Program (ITEP) The Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) administers ITEP program funding for stand-alone pedestrian and bicycle projects. Projects may include bike lanes, bike paths, pedestrian and bicycle structures, river crossings, railroad crossings, bicycle parking, signage, and other similar improvements. Markham may pursue this program to initiate the bicycle and pedestrian plan.

For information visit: www.dot.il.gov/opp/itep.html

96

Illinois Bicycle Path Grants Program Another way to fund the bicycle and pedestrian plan would be to pursue a grant from the Illinois Bicycle Path Grant Program. This grant program provides funding to local governments to acquire, construct, and rehabilitate bicycle paths and related facilities.

For information visit: www.dnr.state.il.us/ocd/newbike2.htm Illinois Green Infrastructure Grant Program for Stormwater (IGIG) IGIG is administered by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) to provide funding for local governments to improve the sustainability of their storm water management systems. The grant supports projects that use best management practices (such as permeable pavers) to better control storm water runoff and improve water quality in the community.

For information visit: www.epa.state.il.us/water/financialassistance/igig.html Community Service Block Grant Program (CSBG) CSBG program is designed to provide a range of services which assist lowincome people to attain skills and to offer immediate life necessities. The grants are administered by the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (DCEO) and put an emphasis on self-sufficiency efforts.

This grant may provide funding for a number of services including the construction and maintenance of community gardens like the proposed community garden at Radio Station Park.

Section 11 Implementation Plan

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Implementation Matrix The implementation matrix on the following pages is a guide on how to accomplish key suggestions in this Comprehensive Plan. The matrix includes the following details:

Action Step A general description of the strategy Phasing- Frequency or timing of action steps to properly allocate resources. There are four types of phasing ranges Lead Partner- The City department, agency, or organization primarily responsible for the action step

On-going Short Term (1 to 3 years) Mid Term (4 to 6 years) Long Term (7+ years)

Partners- A department, agency, or organization that may be important to collaborate with Resources- Physical, financial, or human resources needed to complete the action step ID

Action Step

HOUSING H1 Engage all City departments in implementing housing policies

Phasing

Lead Partner

On-Going

Building, Housing & Licensing Dept.

H2

Address neighborhood blight and foreclosures

Short-Term Building, Housing & Licensing Dept.

H3

Develop policies to limit conversion of single family homes

Short Term Building, Housing & Licensing Dept.

H4 H5

Actively participate in neighborhood and block club activities

On-Going

Implement a rental housing registration/inspection program

Short Term Building, Housing & Licensing Dept.

H6

Promote diversification of the housing stock

On-Going

H7

Develop standards to promote quality development

Short Term Building, Housing & Licensing Dept.

H8 H9 H10 H11

Coordinate with MWRD to eliminate neighborhood flooding

Mayor’s Office

Partner(s)/Resources All other City Departments, School Districts Cook County (Housing Authority, Economic Development), CMAP, SSMMA

All City Departments

Economic Development Department Economic Development Department

Economic Development

Promote sustainability with residents (energy and water conservation, etc.)

On-Going

Mayor’s Office

Integrate best management practices into new development

On-Going

Engineering

Work with land banks to acquire and rehab foreclosed properties

Short Term Economic Development Cook County, SSMMA

Economic Development Department

Table 11.0: Implementation Matrix

97

Section 11 Implementation Plan

ID

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Action Step

Lead Partner

Partner(s)/Resources

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E1 Renovate and reinvigorate the Canterbury Shopping Plaza E2 Create and maintain a business retention program, including regular visits to all

Short Term Shopping Plaza Owner Economic Development Department

E3

Partner with CSEDC and others to attract new retail and restaurants through ICSC and other organizations

On-Going

Economic Development SSMMA/CSEDC

E4

Develop newsletters, directories, web sites, and other tools to link local businesses with residents and enhance communications

On-Going

Chamber of Commerce Economic Development

E5

Stay in frequent contact with shopping center owners and commercial brokers regarding vacancies and potential new tenants

On-Going

Economic Development Commercial Property Owners/ Brokers

existing businesses

Short Term Economic Development Chamber of Commerce, Mayor’s Office

E6 Explore a new TIF District along 159th Street between Crawford and Kedzie Avenue LAND USE L1 Continue efforts to redevelop proposed mixed use area along 159th Street between

Short Term Economic Development TIF Consultant, property owners

L2

Seek opportunities for new housing, particularly along Kedzie north of 151st Street, and north of the commercial businesses along 159th Street

Mid Term

L3

Seek hospitality users and/or a truck stop near major interchanges off I-294 and I-57 Mid Term

Economic Development Commercial Brokers, Hospitality users

L4 L5

Seek Cargo Oriented Development on the east side of I-294

Mid Term

Economic Development Industrial Brokers, Property Owners

Seek new retail/restaurant tenants along 159th Street, particularly between Kedzie and I-57

Mid Term

Economic Development Property Owners, Commercial Brokers

L6

Notify property owners of the City’s interest in annexation and conduct informational Short Term Economic Development Property Owners meeting to discuss the benefits of annexation Department

L7

Annexation of properties noted in the Land Use Section

I-294 and Dixie Highway, including: • Property assembly • Brownfield remediation • Elimination of flooding issues • Extension of Western Avenue (see transportation steps) • Work with commercial brokers/tenants

98

Phasing

Short to Mid Economic Development CSEDC/SSMMA, MWRD, Army Term Corps

Mid Term

Economic Development Residential developers

Economic Development Property Owners, Village Attorney Department

Section 11 Implementation Plan

ID

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Action Step

Phasing

Lead Partner

Partner(s)/Resources

TRANSPORTATION T1 Add Sunset Avenue and Belleplaine Drive to the Federal Aid Route program T2 Complete engineering and work with property owners to acquire right-of-way for

Short Term

T3

Complete Pavement Evaluation Survey and develop Capital Improvement Plan

Short Term City of Markham Public Engineering Consultant Works

T4

Work with IDOT to implement pedestrian improvements in and around the Canterbury Shopping Center outlined in the I-294/I-57 Interchange Land Use and Economic Development Plan

Short Term City of Markham

IDOT, Pace, Cook County

T5

Work with Pace to enhance pedestrian access in and around bus stops.

Mid Term

Pace

City of Markham, Cook County, IDOT

T6

Secure funding for Western Avenue extension (including developer contributions, TIF, and grants) and begin roadway construction

Mid Term

City of Markham

SSMMA/CSEDC, Engineering Consultant

T7

Continue to seek funding for roadway improvements and implement and update Capital Improvement Plan

Mid Term

City of Markham

Engineering Consultant

T8

Work with IDOT on ways to improve pedestrian/bike access along 159th Street across the interchanges at I-57 and the Tollway Authority at I-294

Mid Term

City of Markham

IDOT, Pace

T9

Work with Pace to provide additional bus stops as needed along 159th Street to accommodate new development

Long Term Pace

City of Markham, Local Businesses

T10

Complete construction of the Western Avenue extension and work with IDOT to provide a traffic signal at the new Western Avenue/159th Street intersection

Long Term City of Markham

IDOT

T11

Continue to seek funding for roadway improvements and implement and update Capital Improvement Plan

Long Term City of Markham

Engineering Consultant

T12

Construct enhanced pedestrian improvements along 159th Street and remove the existing, non-ADA compliant pedestrian bridge over I-57

Long Term IDOT

City of Markham

Short Term City of Markham

FHWA, City Engineering Consultant

Western Avenue extension between 159th and 167th Streets.

99

Section 11 Implementation Plan

ID

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Action Step

Phasing

Lead Partner

Partner(s)/Resources

COMMUNITY FACILITIES & INFRASTRUCTURE C1 Develop a schedule for Police Department facility updates C2 Develop a plan to improve the Fire Department’s ISO Public Protection Classification

Mid Term

Police Department

Mid Term

Fire Department

C3

Pursue the development of a Nature Center along 159th Street

Mid Term

City

C4 C5

Pursue the replacement of under sized water mains to 8-inch diameter minimum

On-Going

Public Works

Conduct a valve exercise and replacement program to enhance fire protection, reduce water losses and prepare for natural disasters

Short Term Public Works

Consultants

C6 C7 C8

Update the City’s water distribution system atlas to a GIS based system

Short Term Public Works

Engineering Consultant, CSEDC

Finance Department/City Council

Rating

Illinois Nature Conservancy, Friends of the Indian Boundary Prairies

Schedule improvements to Markham’s main pump facility at 156th and Crawford Ave Short Term Public Works

Engineering Consultant

Schedule improvements to Markham’s booster station pump facility at 161st and Hermitage Ave

Short Term Public Works

Engineering Consultant

C9 C10 C11 C12

Schedule improvements to the two lift stations

Short Term Public Works

Engineering Consultant

Schedule the inspection and repairs of combined sewers

On-Going

Public Works

Engineering Consultant

Schedule the separation of sewers for the combined sewers areas

Mid-Term

Public Works

Engineering Consultant

Pursue the drainage channel and culvert improvements outlined in the MWRD report On-Going

Public Works

Engineering Consultant

C13

Coordinate with each of the school districts to periodically to assess the facilities, staffing, and resource needs of the schools serving the community

Public Works

School Districts

Nature Conservancy

City of Markham

On-Going

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUSTAINABILITY Long Term G1 Expand the boundaries of the conserved open space for prairies based on the Future Land Use Plan

G2 G3

100

Pursue naturalization of the drainage channels as per the green infrastructure plan

Long Term MWRD

City of Markham

Complete sidewalk connections to existing Pace Routes, parks and community facilities

Mid Term

City of Markham, IDOT, Cook County

Pace

Section 11 Implementation Plan

ID

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Action Step

Phasing

Lead Partner

Partner(s)/Resources

G4

Pursue federal and state grant programs, such as the Federal Recreational Trails Program and the Illinois Bike Path Grant to provide funding and development assistance to upgrade existing trails and installing new trails

G5

Pursue grant programs such as the Illinois Green Infrastructure Grant Program for Stormwater (IGIG) to construct green infrastructure like permeable paved parking lots

Short Term City of Markham

G6

Encourage preservation of natural areas and green development practices during development and site review processes

On-Going

G7

Work with organizations such as the Nature Conservancy to implement a rain barrel Short Term Nature Conservancy program

City of Markham

G8

Enlist the free services of the Smart Energy Design Assistance Center (SEDAC) to audit current energy consumption in municipal facilities

Short Term City of Markham

SEDAC

G9

Add sections to the zoning ordinance that will encourage and incentivize alternate energy systems

Short Term Economic Development Planning Consultant

City of Markham

Developers

URBAN DESIGN U1 U2 U3

Establish a gateway and wayfinding signage program

Short Term City of Markham

Design Consultant

Pursue a street light improvement program

Mid Term

City of Markham

IDOT

Develop sculpture park along Kedzie Avenue parkway

Mid Term

City of Markham

The Arts Community

101

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan Survey Summary Introduction

Public participation is vital to any successful planning process. A community survey was created as part of the comprehensive planning process and made available online via the project website. The survey asked questions that would help identify what the respondents like and dislike about the community, existing issues that needed to be addressed, and identify services, programs and amenities that are needed. Over 450 copies of the survey were printed for distribution at public buildings within the community and local church events. A Spanish translation of the survey was also made available online and 50 printed copies of the survey were given to Markham Park District for distribution. Posters and flyers informing residents about this comprehensive planning process and survey information were posted at prominent locations in the community. Survey responses were collected for a period of 3 months, at the end of which 150 responses were collected for the English survey, but zero responses for the Spanish survey.

Interpreting the results

For the 150 responses collected, as Markham has a population of 12,508 (as per the 2010 U. S. Census) for a confidence of 97.5% accuracy, the margin of error is 8%. This means that if 40% of the respondents noted flooding issues, we can assume that between 32% and 48% of the population actually experienced flooding.

The survey was divided into 6 sections with each section focusing on a different theme as followsSection 1- Introductory Questions Section 2- Housing Section 3- Transportation Section 4- Parks and Recreation Section 5- Shopping Section 6- Information and Other issues Each of the sections are described on the following pages along with the questions and responses for each section.

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Section 1- Introductory Questions Purpose: To get a sense of where the survey respondents live and what made them choose Markham as their home, as well as their opinion on key issues in the City.

Results: 



  



Of the 4 areas the City was divided into for the purpose of the survey, respondents were from every area, but the majority of respondents were from area D (between I-57, south of 159th street and west of I-294).

Some of the main reasons respondents choose Markham were the price/value of housing, access to interstates, schools, community character, and proximity to family and friends, while shopping, jobs and access to recreation were lower on the priority list. This is further highlighted in the next question, where 41% were not satisfied with the availability of jobs in the City. Similarly, the same percentage of respondents were not satisfied with the variety of eating establishments in the City which are predominantly fast food in nature.

While somewhat satisfied with the quality of schools, price of housing, safety, community character and variety of retail/shops, improvements to these categories were desired. Better street lighting, public safety and property maintenance were specifically mentioned as issues that need to be addressed.

In general, respondents were satisfied with municipal services like police and fire protection, emergency response, garbage collection, animal control, and library and education institutions.

When cross-tabbed, nearly 50% of the respondents from area D noted that the stormwater management in the City needed improvement.

When crosstabbed with the specific age groups and household types, respondents were satisfied with day care services and senior services, however, adult education and job training for the 45 to 54 and 65 to 74 age groups needed improvement. Similarly, cross-tabbed responses for long-term residents highlighted a need for improved property maintenance, and after school and park district programs.

Some suggestions included a city-wide yard sale and other community activities each month, neighborhood patrols for areas that have large groups of children and indoor walking trails that are accessible for all age groups and abilities.

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

1. Where do you live? Please refer to the map above and select from the options below:

Answer Options

Response Percent

2.9% A - North and West of I-57 B - Between I-57, I-294 and North of 159th 19.4% Street 20.1% C - East of I-294 D - Between I-57, South of 159th Street and 46.8% West of I-294 10.8% Outside of Markham answered question skipped question

Response Count 4 27 28 65 15 139 11

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

2. How important were these factors in your decision to move to or stay in Markham?

Answer Options Near family and friends Price/value of housing Near jobs Access to Interstates Availability of shopping, restaurants and services Schools Place of Worship (eg: Church) Community character Near recreation/forest preserves Other If other, please specify.

Very important

Somewhat important

Not important

Response Count

67 87 57 79

26 22 23 23

25 14 29 14

118 123 109 116

65

31

14

110

77 60 70 41 16

19 26 31 39 6

21 26 13 26 7

117 112 114 106 29 11 143 7

answered question skipped question

Other Important Factors:      

Return to family home Low taxes Place of employment Sense of community Transportation access Affordable housing for seniors

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

3. How satisfied are you with each of the following?

Answer Options Availability of jobs in Markham Quality of schools Price/value of housing General safety Open space and recreational facilities Community character (with respect to buildings) Attractiveness of streetscape and signage Cleanliness of streets and sidewalks Access to healthcare facilities Quality of healthcare facilities Variety of retail/shops Variety of eating establishments (eg.: Restaurants, coffee shops, etc.)

Other If other, please specify:

Satisfied

Somewhat Satisfied

Not Satisfied

No Opinion

Response Count

15 41 38 48

38 53 51 57

53 21 30 26

23 19 12 5

129 134 131 136

55

47

27

9

138

38

53

32

8

131

32

55

32

11

130

39

54

38

4

135

52 40 33

35 37 52

27 29 41

21 25 6

135 131 132

29

44

53

4

130

8

2

9

6

25 8 146 4

answered question skipped question

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

4. Please state your opinion on the following community services in the City of Markham.

Answer Options Ambulance service/911 Emergency response Fire protection service Police protection Garbage collection Stormwater management Animal control Day care services Senior services Adult education Job training Public library Property maintenance Elementary/Middle school High school Community college After school programs Park district programs Other If other, please specify

Satisfied

Needs improvement

No opinion

Response Count

80

26

28

134

94 83 101 41 70 49 65 35 26 90 48 63 44 58 39 52 9

17 42 21 63 44 22 30 48 62 27 65 38 40 30 53 56 9

21 8 12 24 19 55 37 43 37 15 17 31 42 37 33 20 12

132 133 134 128 133 126 132 126 125 132 130 132 126 125 125 128 30 12 144 6

answered question skipped question

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Section 2- Housing Purpose:

To understand how people perceive the housing market within the City and if they have experienced any flooding issues

Results: 







As per the responses to questions in this section, the housing for seniors is sufficient and there is availability of moderately priced housing.

However, more housing is needed for recent college grads and young professionals.

When the results were cross-tabbed, 50% of households with pre-school or school aged children responded that there was insufficient housing for young families like themselves. This is a point worth noting, as Markham has a large number of households with children. In addition, 60% of households with more than 5 people agreed that the housing for larger families was insufficient.

The property of 60% of the respondents had not experienced any flood damage. However, of the 40% that did experience damage, around 10% was major damage. Major flooding included water backing up on the main level, basement flooding and yard flooding, and sudden flooding due to sump pump failures, while minor flooding included roof, window and basement leaks and yard flooding. Damage to flooring and furniture was common to those that experienced flooding.

The respondents were also asked about what they wanted to see in their neighborhood. A higher percentage of respondents noted that good schools, daycare, access to neighborhood services, shopping and parks already existed in the community, but there was a need for better sidewalk connections, pedestrian and bicycle access to community facilities, shops, and trails, good construction quality and design standards, street lighting, active neighborhood associations, and property maintenance, as well as programs to encourage property maintenance.

Additional comments were also noted on the need for well-lit streets, specifically in the neighborhood between 159th Street and 163rd Street.

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

5. As per your knowledge, please answer each of the following questions with respect to the City of Markham Answer Options

Yes

No

Is there sufficient housing for seniors?

Is there sufficient housing for young families?

Is there sufficient housing for recent college grads and young professionals?

Is there sufficient housing for larger families?

Is there sufficient moderately priced housing?

22 8

4 6

I do not know 15 11

8

18

12

14 13 17 30 21 22 answered question skipped question

Response Count 41 25 38 44 73 135 15

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

6. Has your property experienced flood damage in the past 5 years?

Answer Options

Response Percent

15.1% Yes, frequent, minor flood damage 8.7% Yes, frequent, major flood damage 12.7% Yes, infrequent, mild flood damage 3.2% Yes, infrequent, major flood damage 60.3% No flood damage If yes, please briefly describe the extent of flood damage below: answered question skipped question

Response Count 19 11 16 4 76 18 126 24

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

7. Which of the following would you like to see in your neighborhood?

Answer Options Good schools Child care/Day care Well-connected sidewalks Pedestrian access to neighborhood goods/services/shopping Parks Pedestrian & bicycle access to parks, trails, and open space Good construction quality and design standards for housing Well-kept appearance (with respect to landscaping) Well-lit streets Active neighborhood associations Programs to encourage property maintenance Other If other, please specify

Already Exists

Is Needed

No Opinion

66 52 44 55 66 37 34 43 36 34 31 6

34 35 70 55 36 80 67 68 85 70 87 12

22 35 11 14 13 10 23 14 8 20 14 8

answered question skipped question

Response Count 122 122 125 124 115 127 124 125 129 124 132 26 8 138 12

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Section 3- Transportation Purpose: To understand how people utilize public transit to travel in to, out of and around the City and to note which streets have congestion and speeding issues.

Results:    



A majority of the respondents did not use the existing Pace bus routes and Metra service.

Another mode noted was the Senior Wheels Program that was used on an as needed basis.

Majority of the traffic congestion was noted on weekdays during rush hours. Majority noted that speeding was mostly during non-rush hours through-out the week.

Traffic congestion was noted on 159th Street, especially between Pulaski and Kedzie Avenue, along Kedzie avenue north of 159th Street, Dixie Highway between 159th and 167th and along 163rd street. While congestion along most of these roads noted are due to traffic from the interstates accessing the commercial areas along 159th Street and Industrial areas along Dixie Highway, the congestion along 163rd Street is likely due to traffic generated by the Markham Park School. Congestion was also noted on Whipple Avenue due to rush hour traffic. The map below illustrates these areas of congestion.

Speeding was noted along residential streets leading to major arterials.

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

8. How often do you use the following? (Answer all)

Answer Options

1 time or more per week

1 to 3 times per month 6 12 4 8 4 6 5 6

2 to 10 times per year 9 18 7 6 6 5 2 5

7 Metra Rock Island Line 9 Metra Electric Line 10 Pace Bus Route 354 6 Pace Bus Route 356 7 Pace Bus Route 359 7 Pace Bus Route 364 4 Pace Bus Route 773 5 Regional bike trails Other public 5 2 3 transportation options If other, please specify which and frequency of use

Occasionally/ As needed

Never

Response Count

30 37 16 12 14 15 10 12

76 53 86 88 88 88 95 90

128 129 123 120 119 121 116 118

10

61

81 2

answered question skipped question

139 11

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

9. If you frequently experience traffic related issues on certain streets or at intersections, please provide details below.

When?

Answer Options Traffic Congestion Speeding

Weekday

Weekend

Everyday

Holidays

Response Count

37 9

8 18

21 34

4 4

70 65

Rush hours

Non-rush hours

Most of the day

Response Count

47 8

7 21

12 19

66 48

Approximate time of day Answer Options Traffic Congestion Speeding

Question Totals 23

Please type in the specific street/intersection below: answered question skipped question

87 63

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Section 4- Parks and Recreation Purpose:

To understand the Park District needs of the community.

Results: 

 



A majority of the respondents agreed with the listed efforts that the Markham Park district should focus on which included access to parks from neighborhoods, park maintenance, trails for walking and biking, access to recreational activities, high quality indoor and recreational facilities and sports fields. This will help the Park District prioritize projects and improve access to its facilities. However, when asked if they use existing facilities, a majority had never or only occasionally used the existing facilities.

With respect to park district programs, a majority showed interest in having more programs for all age groups, as well as community events.

Some other programs suggested were exercise and healthy living, astronomy, science based activities, health and nutrition, advanced cooking and arts classes for adults, music lesson and workshops, self-respect and grooming classes. There was also a suggestion for a Markham Little League team and a community garden!

Another key suggestion was a Visitor Centre for the prairies.

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

10. Where should the Markham Park District focus its efforts? Please rate each of the following roles: Answer Options Ensuring residents have access to parks in every neighborhood Keeping parks well maintained Providing trails for walking or biking Ensuring that recreational activities are located close to every home Providing high quality indoor recreational facilities Providing high quality sports fields Other Other (please specify)

Important

Somewhat important

Neutral/ Not sure

Not very important

Not at all important

Response Count

88

24

6

2

4

124

109 96

10 22

5 7

0 0

1 1

125 126

73

33

7

2

3

118

94 75 16

19 29 4

5 13 1

0 0 0

3 3 0

121 120 21 7

answered question skipped question

128 22

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

11. What programs should the Markham Park District focus its efforts on? Please rate each of the following: Answer Options Providing more programs for kids (5 to 10 years) Providing more programs for teens (11 to 14 years) Providing more programs for youth (14 to 19 years) Providing more programs for adults Providing more programs for seniors Hosting community events Other Other (please specify)

Important

Somewhat important

Neutral /Not sure

Not very important

Not at all important

Response Count

90

14

16

0

4

124

93

11

18

0

2

124

89

11

18

2

2

122

76 81 75 13

27 22 25 2

18 18 15 5

1 0 1 0

2 2 3 4

124 123 119 24 6

answered question skipped question

129 21

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

12. How often do you use the following types of open spaces or parks?

Answer Options A park near your home (regardless of size) Park with sports fields Park with basketball courts Park with tennis courts Greenways, natural areas, woods, trails Parks with indoor facilities (e.g., recreation center)

Twice a month or more 28 22 19 17 24 22

11 11 8 6 4

A few times a year 19 20 19 12 24

8

19

Once a month

Occasionally

Never

Response Count

32 27 23 22 26

33 39 43 54 39

123 119 112 111 117

32

28

109

answered question skipped question

127 23

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

13. Is there anything else you would like to tell us about open space, parks and recreation in the Markham Park District?

Response Count

Answer Options

10 answered question skipped question

10 140

Other comments        

Not enough parks for children I think there should be a Markham Little League baseball team Community Gardens are needed Not used due to unavailable park programs or trails in subdivision park Walking trails, bike trails Too many fees.

Inside walking trails for seniors thank you for being there!

"There is a neighborhood celebration that happens annually in Country Air. It could use space but has gotten along okay since the Nature Conservancy courtened off all of its property. The prairies are the only open spaces but they are by appointment only and they focus on the external. Their visitors center is not a place where people can come and see what is in the prairie before going out to it. We need a center for people to learn what there is to appreciate. A place where you can actually see exhibits, sit and read (they have books but they consider the place a prep station for outdoors). It doesn't have to be the largest nature museum just a place where one would want to come and explore.

Not everyone can or will walk the prairie. There should be teaching videos, s to view and learn about the species there, what scientist do in the prairie and even some things that the visitor can do hands on. Otherwise its attract the same few people and really is not accessible to all."

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Section 5- Shopping Purpose:

To understand where people go to shop and how often they go out to shop and eat.

Results: 

 

  

In an average month, a majority of respondents shop locally at Canterbury and other businesses along 159th Street, and the Walmart Supercenter at Pulaski and 167th. Access to Sibley Boulevard for shopping is not typical.

With respect to eating out, 159th Street and Canterbury were favorites again, followed by Orland Park and Tinley Park.

Most survey respondents also mentioned that they visited fine dining and other restaurants occasionally and hardly went to bars outside Markham. However, suggestions were made for the addition of quick service and casual dining restaurants like chipotle, Olive Garden and Applebees in Markham. A comprehensive list of the suggestions is included with each of these questions.

In an average week, a majority of the respondents spent $25 to $50 on meals away from home.

As for the other shopping options mentioned in the survey, a majority of the respondents visited them occasionally and hence were not worth noted as specifically needed in the community.

With respect to stores that respondents were interested in seeing in Markham, hardware stores, building materials, craft and household item stores were suggested.

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

14. In an average month, how many times do you SHOP* in the following commercial areas? (*Include visits to coffee shops or convenience stores, but not visits to restaurants) Answer Options Sibley Corridor Canterbury Shopping Center 159th Street (Other than Canterbury) Walmart Supercenter (Pulaski & 167th) River Oaks Matteson Downtown Chicago Other If other, please specify:

Once 22 15 18 17 35 33 39 7

Two to four times 20 49 35 42 31 44 19 6

Five or more times 9 57 51 59 17 19 13 4

Never 51 7 14 8 36 22 44 4

answered question skipped question

Response Count 102 128 118 126 119 118 115 21 12 131 19

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

15. In an average month, how many times do you EAT OUT in the following commercial areas?

Answer Options Sibley Corridor Canterbury Shopping Center 159th Street (Other than Canterbury) Walmart Supercenter (Pulaski & 167th) River Oaks Matteson Downtown Chicago Other If other, please specify:

Once 22 28 24 21 23 37 37 7

Two to four times 20 50 52 40 32 29 15 6

Five or more times 1 16 13 17 4 8 10 4

Never 71 29 26 41 59 44 52 8

answered question skipped question

Response Count 114 123 115 119 118 118 114 25 14 129 21

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

16. How often do you eat at the following types of restaurants OUTSIDE of Markham?

Answer Options White table cloth restaurant (leisurely dining, gourmet food, prices matching full service level) Casual dining (family oriented menu, with full service) Bar or club (limited food options and a focus on entertainment or sports) Counter service restaurant (order at counter, employee brings food to table or carry out service) Quick service restaurant (order and receive food at counter or drive-thru service) Other (please specify)

Two times per week or more 6 9 8 12 13

Weekly

Monthly

Occasionally

Never

9 14 7 22 35

23 33 11 22 21

51 47 28 41 36

27 17 60 20 12

answered question skipped question

Response Count 116 120 114 117 117 1 122 28

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

17. In the past month, what restaurants OUTSIDE of Markham did you eat at that would be good additions to Markham?                               

Golden Corral Chipotle, Chili's, Applebees, Buffalo Wild Wings Chipotle, Panera, TGIF Boston Market, Starbucks Coffee Steak and Shake Popeyes, Papa John Pizza Applebees Red lobster -Matteson Baked meats with soulfood side dishes/ steam table Boston Market Starbucks, Ruby Tuesday's Outback, Red Lobster, Chipotle Applebees, Red Lobster, Crackerbarrel, Olive Garden Little Village Buffalo Wild Wings and Olive Garden Hardee's and Wendy's Culvers Pizza Long John Silvers, Boona Beef, Connies Pizza Chilis, IHOP Golden Corral Denny's Panda Express, Panera Bread, Starbucks Denny's, Panera Bread, Chipotle Golden Corral, Red Lobster, Chipotle Baby's, Chipotle I-57 BBQ House Red Lobster Golden Corral Outback, Bonefish, Olive Garden, Famous Daves, and Fridays

Appendix

                            

Wednys wingstop Buffalo Wild Wings panera bread Chili's, Maria's, Golden Corral, Internation House of Pancakes, Culvers, Chuckie Cheese Golden Corral, Pancake House Portillos, Steakhouse olive garden "Chick-Fil-A Olive Garden" Longhorn Steakhouse, Texas Roadhouse Flavor restaurant in Flossmoor and LA in Hazel Crest Blueberry Hill Apple bees, Red Lobster, Hooters, Shrimp Express Blue Berry Hill Cracker Barrel I did not eat there but I hear that that Daddy place in Country Club Hills is very good.

TGI Fridays, Chilis Wendy's Golden Corral Golden Corral Olive Garden, Red Lobster, Golden Corall Red Lobster, Portillos Wendy's, Denny's Applebee's Panera Bread, Portilleos, Steak & Shake, Red Lobster, and Olive Garden.

Portillos Marianos Buffalo Wild Wings Old Country Buffet BBQ Houlihan's but I don't see that in Markham.

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

18. In an average week, how much would you estimate that your household spends on meals away from home (full-service restaurants, take-out, drive-thru, coffee shops, etc.)

Answer Options Less than $25 $25 to $49.99 $50 to $74.99 $75 to $99.99 $100 to $199.99 Over $200

Response Percent 27.5% 31.7% 20.0% 11.7% 4.2% 5.0% answered question skipped question

Response Count 33 38 24 14 5 6 120 30

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

19. How often do you spend money on these goods OUTSIDE of Markham?

Answer Options Children's apparel Women's apparel Men's apparel Shoes Make-up/cosmetics Jewelry and accessories Gardening supplies Furniture Home accessories (eg: linen, decor) Art work Hardware Building Materials Health food Fine wine and spirits Ice cream/desserts Groceries Coffee shops Pet supplies Florist Pharmacy Books Craft supplies Greeting cards/gifts Sporting goods Other If other, please specify.

2 times per week or more 11 13 6 9 6 8 5 4 7 5 8 8 8 10 7 19 11 8 5 6 4 6 6 5 3

Weekly

Monthly

Occasionally

Never

5 8 8 6 2 3 4 2 5 2 7 2 7 13 14 23 9 3 4 7 5 4 4 3 2

12 24 17 24 16 19 13 6 15 6 14 17 11 12 17 22 10 14 13 27 9 9 13 13 4

32 48 43 58 47 48 54 62 59 45 56 48 47 36 43 31 36 21 35 32 45 41 52 40 7

46 18 30 14 30 23 27 25 17 43 19 29 25 31 18 11 36 52 41 28 35 36 24 37 6

answered question skipped question

Response Count 106 111 104 111 101 101 103 99 103 101 104 104 98 102 99 106 102 98 98 100 98 96 99 98 22 2 118 32

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

20. In the past month, what did you buy outside of Markham that you wish that you could have bought in Markham?                             

clothes,home goods, dinning out,craft supplies,and a variety of grocery stores Gifts for Christmas, womens specialty store- Avenue ,Lane Bryant Wholesale club items  Sport Appearel  Suits  Bank  Pet supplies, women shoes  Clothes, specialty foods  Fresh groceries  Sporting goods  Clothes Shoes  Ice cream  Nothing  Clothing - greeting cards  Pizza  Hardware  Hardware products. Retail food  Shoes  Boys Bicycle, 10' Google Tablet  Walmart  Jordans  Shoes  Shoes Hardware Supplies Hardware A lot pork chops everything Clothes, and home repair items.

Clothes, hardware supplies dog food & treats Hardware Items Hardware/Building Materials/ Lawn, Gardening/ Clothing/Electronics Automobile A car Building materials Furniture Movie Theater craft materials, material House building, repair supplies Furniture stores, shoe stores, eyeglasses stores.

Italian Beef Sandwhich Tires.

Christmas Presents Coat Arts & crafts from school store in River Oaks Hot water tank mexican food Bathroom tile. Home and Garden supplies.

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

21. Please provide the name of that store outside of Markham where you made that purchase.                            

Michaels,Joann fabric,food for less, Ultra,Menard & Ace hardwear Target,TJ Max Sams Club Dicks Sporting Goods K&G Walts Macy, DSW, Petco Ross, Whole Foods, and Marianos Walmart "Dick's Sport's Authority" The Limited, NY & Company, Macys, Carson, JCPenny, True Religion, Polo, Lucky Brand, Nine West, The Loft, Old Navy, Gap, Children Place, Armani Exchange Dairy Queen Coach, Foot action, HHGregg Party City, Roamans, Beggars pizza HomeDepot Carsons, Sears, Macy, Walmart Home Depot, Target Foot Locker Walmart Wal-Mart Footlocker Macy's Payless Menards in Crestwood Menards Walmat target jewels

Appendix

                     

penny, Walts, Macy Ross, Menards, Walmart Home Depot, Burlington menards/ace Lowes Menards (Tinley Park), Old Navy (Orland Park), Walmart(Country Club Hills) Home Depot, Ross, Jewel food stores Rizza Ford (Major Dealer) Home Depot, Homewood,IL Walmart Joann Fabrics, Michaels Menards, Home Depot Menards Darvins, Ashley Furniture, DSW Shoestore, Lenscrafters.

Calumet Park Pep boys Walmart J.C. Penny River Oaks drive art store Menards ultra foods Menards

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

Section 6- Information Purpose:

To better understand the type of respondent and the reason for their answer selection.

Results:

This information was used to cross-tab responses for specific demographic types like age groups, household types and household composition.

22. Which age group do you currently belong to?

Appendix

23. How long have you lived in Markham?

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

24. How many people live in your household?

25. Choose the answer that best describes your household.

Appendix

City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

26. If you have any additional concerns or issues you feel the City of Markham should address in planning for the future, please list them below:         

         



More parks are needed, more stores, more community activities, & anything that would lower the taxes No, programs should go unfinished, citizens, seniors, children or adults. Prompt and proper planning with a timeline should be visible at all times.

Lower vendor prices for small businesses Side walks are needed and upgraded park equipment in the smaller neighborhood parks for children are needed.

"Enforce curfew among youth, especially at liquor stores, and gas stations.

April/May- Clean our community month.

June/July-Markham congratulates kids for well job during school year.

October/November- Markham salutes seniors. Encourage youths to be more respectable and manner-able."

AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING. Something more affordable than $1,000 monthly. Most retirees don't have that much in retirement income.

For $1,000 monthly I personally would expect more amenities (heated swimming pool, with jacuzzi, etc), walkway and parklike sitting area enclosed on the grounds. I would like larger rooms too. I didn't consider the local one on Kedzie because of price and square footage. Great idea though. We baby boomers need a little more. Maybe build retirement houses like in Olympia Fields that are not as expensive but the same idea.

Sidewalk Have Neighbors help clean abandoned property. I WILL HELP. "The water tower NEEDS to be painted. maybe a color that doesn't show dirt.

Also there needs to be more street lights installed throughout the neighborhood."

Senior Building Create more jobs for young people "Increased security at business establishments. Example: strip malls. Less loitering outside of businesses.

Some neighborhoods need greater lighting- perhaps to thwart criminal activity."

The city being 60 million dollars in debt is my greatest concern. Future city expenses that are passed on to home owners via city portions of property taxes. Security, lighting of streets, flooding, and mail delivery security is needed.

Code enforcement and animal control issues. You can issue a citation for someone leaving a garbage can out for an extra day, but animal control issues with animal not being fenced in properly ( dangerous dogs ) are not addressed at all. I look forward to moving out of Markham and will do so when able to.

Housing not affordable

Appendix

               



City of Markham Comprehensive Plan

More police!

Repair of a street (Troy) Ave. from 155st to after in Bel Aire Park.

Continue to make improvements in quality housing and beautification.

Getting a permit faster.

Sit down restaurants and fitness center "Shopping mall Restaurant with tables with white table cloth" New Sidewalks Need proper street lights. Streets are very dark at night, only two lights for entire three blocks on Honore.

Apply for governors hometown award, movies in the parks.

Please add more street lights through neighborhoods It takes TOO LONG to get MINOR things done such as replace STREETSIGNS in Canterbury and on my BLOCK STREET LIGHTS Upkeep for vacant houses, fences, yard Why can't these back yards be clean? Parkways code enforces what do they do other than ride around? If you are persistent in getting something done call your alderman and she gets mad. Who cares about our community to keep it clean and orderly??

Survey too long "Build stronger neighborhoods, keep down places that are frequented by or attract criminals, from our own and other towns. (Fewer liquor and tobacco stores, fewer startups or venues that attract a certain demographic from crime ridden communities. Build a better downtown or more hubs that attract aware, socially conscious persons from within and without our community. Work on the redevelopment of neighborhoods, one neighborhood at a time to prevent large pockets of crime form forming within neighborhoods. Build into the city and plan things that attract minds willing to help solve the problem by challenging their creativity and offering incentives.

To start: A direct mailing campaign. Solicit members to participate in focus groups. Phase I Markham residents. Phase II Markham residents and some surrounding communities non profits created to solve urban problems. Pay them to participate. Continue to work on the Markham residents to hold their attention. Use social media. Set up a demonstration project. Use a vacant store to have a presence where people can walk in, ask questions and where these focus groups can be held. Keep signs in the window like a campaign headquarter. Throw frequent open houses like Business After Hours not connected to the chamber. BE VISIBLE."