The Hoya: The Guide: February 14, 2014

Page 1

the guide FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2014

‘v’

the

wword ord

The choice to abstain in an over-sexualized college culture VICTORIA EDEL Hoya Staff Writer

C

ollege students have sex. Older generations shake their finger at hookup culture while students themselves grapple to make sense of it all. Maybe they’re looking for love, connection, pleasure or some combination of the three, or maybe they’re looking for nothing at all. Yet, for all the think pieces that focus on sex at college, most of them leave out an important demographic: virgins. According to the Guttmacher Institute, 61 percent of American 18-year-olds have had sex, and while that may be the number people focus on most, there’s another 39 percent of that group that are virgins. By age 20, the number of people who have had sex goes up to about 72 percent, leaving a quarter of that age group sexually inexperienced. There is no major difference between the numbers for men and women. Within that population, there’s a lot of diversity. There are those who abstain for religious or moral reasons. There are those who haven’t found the right person. There are students for whom it’s simply not a priority, and there are those who have tried to lose it — with little success. With sex such a frequent topic among college students — and, in some cases, a point of pride — it’s obvious why some who fall into the minority category might feel anxious about their virgin

status. A quick Google search shows thousands of articles about the topic, ranging from adults recounting their own experiences as collegiate virgins to current undergrads explaining why retaining their V-card makes them uncomfortable. The website College Crush calls it “The Burden of Being a Virgin.” Kate (COL ’16)* identifies as a virgin, and, while she admits that her inexperience may keep her from taking risks, she doesn’t consider it a “burden.” She hasn’t had sex yet mostly because she hasn’t found someone she wants to lose her virginity to. “The option hasn’t presented itself. I would have to get to a very comfortable state before even considering it,” she said. Kate doesn’t see herself having sex before she’s in a long-term, committed relationship, which she has yet to find at Georgetown.

Kate isn’t sure how her sexual inexperience compares with her friends’ lives, partially because the phrase “hook up” can have so many meanings. To different people at different times, it can mean making out, oral sex or sexual intercourse. Some of Kate’s friends use the term interchangeably, making it difficult to distinguish the implications. “You never really know what a person’s perspective is on [casual sex] because you don’t know what their definition is,” she said. “People talk about [their hookups] all the time. … What did you actually do, and what does that mean to you?” Kate personally has no interest in the hookup scene, in any sense of the word. “I don’t think I would ever meet a stranger and have sex with them, not at this point,” she said. And while her friends often make out with boys

they meet at parties, she’s not comfortable doing that with someone she just met. ---------------------------------------------------For those in the LGBTQ community at Georgetown, the matter of remaining a virgin is further complicated by certain expectations and stereotypes. Aaron* (SFS ’16), like Kate, also wants to wait until he trusts his partner completely before he has sex. That means that, although he has been in three relationships, he has remained a virgin. “I don’t do anything [sexual] unless I’m in a relationship with someone because I personally like that emotional connection. I think it just heightens it,” he said. “I need to trust this person completely before I can make that jump to sex.” “There definitely is a big pressure to have lots See VIRGINITY, B2

THIS WEEK THEATER REVIEW

LIFESTYLE

Corrupt to the Core

Folger Theatre production highlights the dark side of ‘Richard III’ VICTORIA EDEL Hoya Staff Writer

Pairing Stats and Human Rights

Alex Luta (COL ’16) discusses how the success of his statistics research has contributed to a human rights project. B2

Newseum Exhibit Falls Short

The “Anchorman” exhibit at the Newseum is more hype than substance, featuring little more than props of a cult film. B3

FOOD & DRINK

Bowling Alley With Culinary Flair A new entertainment and dining venue on M Street is perfect for good times and good food. B5

ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT

The Drama of Love

“Endless Love” conveys the unique, up-and-down emotions of young romance. B6

Fusing Global Sounds

Bombay Bicycle Club’s new album experiments with styles and techniques from around the world with mixed results. B6

THEHOYA.COM/ THE-GUIDE @thehoyaguide

There’s something perversely appropriate about performing “Richard III” — one of William Shakespeare’s bloodiest and most political plays — just a block from the Capitol Building. Shakespeare’s Richard, a devious, evil, masterful politician, would certainly give the men and women of the Hill a run for their money. “Richard III,” playing at the Folger Theatre until March 16, focuses on one of England’s most controversial kings. At the play’s beginning, he’s merely the brother of the newly crowned king, their family having just won the throne at the end of a long war. Richard (Drew Cortese) is the ugly duckling of his three brothers — crippled and generally considered the outcast — but his eyes are on revenge and the throne. He manipulates the tensions of the court in order to get what he wants. Where Richard differentiates from the typical American congressman (well, hopefully) is that he isn’t afraid to murder people in order to get what he wants. At least, that’s the way Shakespeare paints him, though historians have argued for centuries as to whether that portrait is accurate. Shakespeare hasn’t written a story that is easy to perform convincingly. The audience needs to both love and hate Richard in order to be invested in the story, and have some grasp of what all the court politics are about. If one focuses too much on that second task — whose allegiances are with whom at any moment, what the characters’ back stories are — the story becomes a little incomprehensible. I could tell that the audience was getting caught on details; I’ve never seen so many people look at the program in the middle of a show to try to remember which character is related to whom. But loving and hating Richard? It’s easy to do that while watching the Folger’s production. Cortese’s Richard is charming from the play’s beginning, drawing the See FOLGERS, B3

COURTESY TERESA WOOD

Lord Stanley (Richard Sheridan Willis) crowns Richard (Drew Cortese) in a performance of one of William Shakespeare’s most twisted dramas at the Folger Theatre.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.