VOLUME 46, ISSUE 25
2
APRIL 22, 2011
FEATURES
The Advocate
page 6
With a strike looming, why is there no talking?
Budget proposal includes tuition increase and parking fee By Jen Ashenberner
Inside the video game development degree
Editorial
MHCC President John Sygielski, to a serenade Wednesday night of stomping feet and chanting faculty members outside the board room, presented a proposal for a balanced budget to deal with a projected $5.8 million shortfall. The shortfall for the next fiscal year was attributed by Sygielski to projected state funding cuts. This is an increase from earlier reports by the board of a $5.5 million shortfall. The proposed 2011-2012 general fund budget is $66 million, an increase of about a million dollars from the current year’s general fund budget. Sygielski, in his proposal to the MHCC board acting as the district budget committee, said, “The state expects community colleges to balance their budgets by increasing tuition, so we propose to increase our tuition by $6 per credit hour.” The proposed increase in tuition and a parking fee of $25 per term were presented as revenue generating items. Sygielski said these increases, plus a $5 increase in the college service fee and $10 for the distance learning fees and increasing rental rates
by 20 percent, was estimated to generate $450,000 of new revenue with a “onetime only implementation cost of about $250,000.” Another item in the proposal was cost reduction in the area of instruction, which includes honoring the layoff notices delivered to full-time faculty and reducing the number of full-time faculty to 153 to save the college approximately $1.4 million and eliminating two dean positions estimated to save the college $280,000. District board member Ralph Yates addressed the audience, pointing out that over the 12 years he has sat on the board the college has lost 12 years worth of interest, “which any mathematician in the audience can calculate is 30 percent roughly.” “This is what we have and what we have to work with,” he said. Yates asked, “How much would (tuition) have to go up in order to accommodate the current demands?” Sygielski responded that it could be $6-$8 per credit hour. Board member Dave Shields asked Sygielski what the one-time implementation cost of $250,000 was for regarding
See Contract on page 8
Board will not impose contract; no date for strike
Earthquake Awareness Month hits MHCC page 7
FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK FOR UPDATES THROUGHOUT THE WEEK
facebook.com/ TheAdvocateOnline
By Jordan Tichenor The Advocate
The MHCC District board has decided to not arbitrarily impose its last offer this quarter in the full-time faculty contract negotiations, board chairperson Brian Freeman said Wednesday night. On the faculty side, rumblings of starting the 10-day countdown to a strike have continued this week among faculty association members, according to Sara Williams, the full-time faculty chief negotiator and faculty association president. “There have been discussions (of a strike), but a date has not been set,” said Williams. Freeman said, “We don’t think it will be helpful to impose a contract. The board is trying to be cooperative to avoid a strike. We are taking a break for spring term but we will continue to meet to negotiate. The faculty can still choose to start the clock.” Williams had no response Thursday to the board’s decision not to impose its latest offer. No talks were held or meetings set by either side this week. The last meeting between the parties was a mediated bargaining session April 13. Williams said the association has not had any contact with the administration
4
since the last mediated session. Asked why the faculty association has not reached out to the administration, Williams said the association has been focusing its energy on a number of other things, such as an informational picket Wednesday and the “Subs for Sandwiches,” event Tuesday. Williams said, “If the board could show movement on non-economic issues, in the areas of subcontracting and faculty rights, that would really help us move forward.” Freeman said Wednesday the board does not typically ask for language changes in the contract, and is opposed to faculty right stipulations which would allow a faculty member with seniority to teach a course or bump someone else out of teaching a course. Williams said, “That’s inaccurate,” in response to the statement that the board does not ask for language changes. “In Article 1, they wanted to remove the word part-time from our contract. There were language changes necessary to accomplish that.” Negotiations began more than a year ago and faculty have been working on last year’s expired contract since September. Key disputed economic issues include compensation for extra teach and summer teach and benefits for retired faculty.
Thrower has habit of breaking records
11
Making light of Moliere