The
Beestonian
ISSUE 15: All Resolutions Already Firmly Broken
Free
HeX Productions www.horlix.com Local web design for you and your business @horlix
_Page 2 University of Beestonia BESTonian – Beeston's finest: Mick Brookes _Page 3
A square deal
Bringing in the changes _Page 4 Snake, rattle and roll Adder 'nother thing –Page 5 Bubbling under HORACE'S HALF HOUR _Page 6 Au Contraire: CYCLISTS _Page 7 Beeston Beats New sign at The Vic _Page 8 Famous last words Thought for the month
About Us: We are a locally-run, locally-based, regular, free paper for Beeston and its environs. We are independent in all ways and not-for-profit, so if we say we like it, we really mean it. You’ll find us in good Beeston coffee shops, pubs and other places we love.
After ten years of anticipation, rumour and false hope, the plans of the future look of Beeston Square were officially unveiled by developers Henry Boot in early January. This was not, as one might expect after a decade of expectation, a ceremony to rival the Olympic Opening. Rather, it seemed to slip under most people’s radar. It had little pre-publicity and was held on a Friday, when most people would be at work. It even escaped the notice of the Nottingham Post, who didn’t receive the usual press release informing them of the exhibition, and The Beestonian only got wind of it through a kind tip-off from a reader.
Why such a damp squib? Henry Boot have held the lease for the Square for the last decade, claimed a healthy attendance, yet the vast majority of Beestonians – even local politicians, publicans and business owners – were unaware until afterwards. This seeming shyness triggered the expected conspiracy theories: were the plans so uninspiring it was felt best to give them the least amount of publicity possible? In all honesty, the plans are pretty dull, so this could be seen as a reasonable assumption. They are far from a radical restructuring of our town centre, rather a face-lift. As the Square presently resembles something mutants would stagger down in some post-nuclear apocalypse
B-Movie, anything would be an improvement. Can we just lay straight into Henry Boot for this? I think that would be unfair. Most of the ire towards the developers stems from the lack of ‘development’ in the actual Square itself, and on the debris piles that now sit in place of a fire station, small retail unit and a multi-storey car park. Why? Quite simply, Henry Boot don’t have any control of these areas: they are held by the Council and (on an ad hoc basis) NET to facilitate the tram works. The Square in question is little more than the precinct. Bafflement that the bandstand will stay untouched therefore shouldn’t be directed at Henry Boot: they simply can’t touch it. The decade that has followed Henry Boot handing over £6 million to the Council for the lease have been ten years of antagonism between the present and erstwhile leaseholders. Henry Boot blame the lack of Council support, prevarication and keeping important facts regarding the tram and neighbouring development from them. Prominent Borough councillors who sit on planning committees are now publicly going on record to say ‘I now wish that we never got into bed with Henry Boot’. This is no mere tiff: it is a breakdown in communication that is reaching a level of anger which makes the tram debate seem almost trivial. This is frankly terrifying. Beeston is on the verge of huge change: the tram’s arrival, more Cont. on page 3