The Blue & Gray Press

Page 1

THE

BLUE &GRAY

THE UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON STUDENT NEWSPAPER

April 7, 2016

VOLUME 89 | ISSUE 19

PRESS

SERVING THE COMMUNITY SINCE

1922

Divestment report released; BOV to make decision KELLY EMMRICH Assistant Life Editor

The University of Mary Washington President’s Council on Sustainability released an official report that recommends a 99 percent divestment from fossil fuels. Because of the report, the Board of Visitors has an obligation to make a decision on the issue in their next public board meeting on April 15 and 16. President Richard Hurley said that he intends to make a recommendation to the BOV on divestment for their April meeting. But according to assistant professor of anthropology and sociology Eric Bonds, what the recommendation will contain has not been made public. “In August, President Hurley gave us a list of seven questions to answer in an honest and balanced way, weighing potential costs versus benefits of divestment for a small public liberal arts college, and ultimately making some kind of recommendation on the issue,” said Bonds, who is also co-chair with Erin Wysong of the Divestment Subcommittee. The divestment report is the culmination of all of the deliberation that the subcommittee has done throughout the year. The 23-page report is divided into seven parts that answer Hurley’s seven questions respectively. Alex Sakes / The Blue & Gray Press

•DIVESTMENT | 11

Definition of “administrator” released ALEX RIKER Staff Writer

Earlier this semester at a Student Government Association meeting, vice president for Administration & Finance & CFO Rick Pearce, along with executive director of Budget Financial Analysis Paul Messplay, explained to students that tuition prices might rise in the next coming year. During the meeting, Pearce and Messplay said that they did not have a set definition for what an administrator is, giving the SGA cause for concern that if administrative members are overpaid, it may very well be one of several reasons causing students to possibly pay more tuition. The SGA prompted that “administrator” be defined because the definition of administrator could tie with the tuition costs.Juliette Landphair, the vice president for student affairs, responded to the SGA by sending a definition of what constitutes as an administrator. While inquiring about the matter, Landphair said via email that “these definitions are not new but have been in place for years and are shared by other state public institutions.” According to the Administrative/ Professional Faculty Definitions Spring 2016 Document, ‘administrative fac-

IN THIS

ISSUE

ulty’ (instructor) and ‘administrative’ (professor) were defined as follows: “Administrative Faculty– perform work directly related to the management of the educational and general activities of the institution, department or subdivision. Administrative– administrative faculty who are also awarded teaching rank by contract.” After this information was given out, the SGA was able to get a clear picture of what they were looking at, and overall felt better informed. “I absolutely think the landscape now is more clear, because any definition is better than no definition,” said the vice president of SGA, Alex Obolensky. “As they had no definition previously, I think the Student Government has served an essential function by instigating this process.” The SGA believes it has made progress in the matter, even if it was something as little as gaining a clear and direct definition. He also talked about the availability of knowledge on why tuition costs have increased. “This will position the student body to much more effectively challenge what may well be unnecessary or unjustified cost increases,” Obolensky said.

President Hurley’s Questions 1. What are the pros and cons of divesting from the fossil fuel industry? 2. What alternative strategies can the university follow to address the ultimate goal of impacting climate change? 3. What does UMW already do that addresses sustainability concerns? 4. What would the financial impact be on our endowment if we divest? 5. What is the feasibility of divestment, given the investment profile of the UMW Foundation (e.g. disentangling of a specific type of investment from broad-based funds-of-funds)? 6. Determine whether or not any UMW divestment decision would impact relevant industries, global climate change, and sustainability goals. 7. Examine higher education institutions that have divested and report how they did it and the impact of their decision, i.e. return on investments.

Alex Sakes / The Blue & Gray Press

COLOR EXPLOSION

UBER AWFUL

DISK RACE

Annual Holi Festival shrouds Ball Circle in tradition

Uber safeness questioned by student

Ultimate Frisbee scores historic win in Myrtle Beach

VIEWPOINTS | 5

SPORTS | 3

LIFE | 6


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.