Volume 8 Number 15
www.thebrandeishoot.com
Brandeis University’s Community Newspaper • Waltham, Mass.
9/11 changed campus sense of security Heightened awareness followed terrorist attacks By Jon Ostrowsky Editor
Reflecting on the 10-year anniversary of Sept. 11, university officials described Brandeis as a campus with stronger security protections. Religious leaders depicted Brandeis as a university promoting and practicing religious tolerance
following the 2001 terrorist attacks that sparked a national discussion about religious extremism. “Terrorism was a million miles a way 10 years ago,” Senior Vice President for Administration Mark Collins said. “The university was always considered the home to the students. 9/11 made our responsibility to their safety [stronger].” From a security perspective, Brandeis implemented changes immediately to increase preparedness for terrorist attacks and awareness about campus safety. Because Brandeis is filled with international students and hosts controversial speakers and politicians who debate the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict, the university often coordinates with federal law enforcement agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security to ensure the campus remains secure, Director of Public Safety Ed Callahan said. Public safety coordination extends locally to the Waltham Police Department, state law enforcement officials and to other federal agencies. Bio-medical research and animal rights activism is another cause for increased security threats on campus, Callahan said, explaining that the university receives hate mail and must See SECURITY, page 3
Heller staffer recalls loss of brother in WTC attack By Jon Ostrowsky Editor
It is impossible for Claudia Jacobs ’70 to forget the pain of Sept. 11, 2001, as society reminds her every day of the terrorist attacks that devastated a nation, reshaping American life as we knew it and turning her own life upside down. Sept. 11 is more than a defining moment in American history to Jacobs, who works as a communications director at the Heller school. Instead it is day that left an irreplaceable hole in her family when her 29-year-old brother, Ari Jacobs, a prominent sales executive from Briar Cliff, NY, died in the World Trade Center just days before the birth of his son Gabi. “This 10th anniversary hoopla is just the worst because it’s everywhere. Instead of private pain, it’s public pain,” Jacobs said in her Heller School office on Thursday afternoon. “It’s one thing to be See JACOBS, page 6
ari and claudia jacobs
photo courtesy of claudia jacobs
Dueling experts discuss UN Palestinian statehood vote By Adam Cohen
Special to the Hoot
ghaith al-omari
photo by haley fine/the hoot
Visiting campus to discuss the U.N. Palestinian vote question taking place later in the month, David Makovsky of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and Ghaith al-Omari of the American Task Force on Palestine wanted to do more than simply examine the current situation. Their goal, according to Makovksy, “is to get college students … to look forward to solutions that give dignity to both sides” in a conflict that tends to “generate more heat and less light.” Both Makovsky and al-Omari expressed their concerns about the upcoming move by the Palestinian Authorities—but they were sure to couch the reservations in the language of unity, concern for universal security and the desire to ensure that progress toward understanding and cooperation is not jeopardized. “Our message” on the matter, al-Omari said, “is to go beyond the diplomatic situation” to an immediate future he hopes will be free of anger, irrationality and violence. Whatever happens in New York, both hope that the moderate voices in each party prevail and the spirit of diplomacy prevails. As Professor Ilan Troen suggested in his introduction, the “mess” we confront may also be “the best path.” Al-
Omari hopes that those involved will be able to “put it [the vote] in perspective” and realize this is a single episode in a wider conflict. Should violence break out, “the stakes of confrontation,” Makovsky said, could unleash uncontrollable forces that will only add fuel to the fires of conflict— making the potential for restarting negotiations bleaker than it already is. Understanding the path to averting this potentially nightmarish situation requires an understanding of the political and security needs of both the Palestinians and Israelis. For the state of Israel, Makovsky identified three “poison pills” that it considers a threat to its security and interests: an increase in status that convinces Palestinians to abandon talks with Israel as a means of managing the conflict; an assertion of sovereignty that presents new territorial and occupational challenges; and the threat of “lawfare,” the manipulation of U.N. machinery to haul Israeli Defense Forces personnel in front of international courts. Makovsky warned of the risk of empowering Israel’s hawkish elements should the international community appear to further isolate it. Al-Omari insisted that the Palestinians “need to get something” by means See MIDDLE EAST, page 6
September 9, 2011
President’s Comment
Reflections on Sept. 11, 10 years later By Frederick M. Lawrence Special to the Hoot
I was in Boston on 9/11/01, on the faculty of the Boston University School of Law. It was a beautiful morning, but otherwise a routine day as the law school and the university got into the flow of fall term. I had driven our children and several others to their school that morning—it was my turn to drive carpool. I arrived at the office just in time to hear the news that the first jet had hit one of the Twin Towers. As of that moment, there was still the hope that is was a terrible and tragic accident. The radio was on in our suite of offices and as each person arrived, he or she joined the group of us listening intensely for more news. When the second aircraft crashed shortly thereafter, of course, we knew it was no accident. Then we heard about the other planes, at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania, and the scope of the attack was astonishing and frightening. We knew, instinctively, that we were immediately living in a new world—one shaped by terrorist acts that we struggled to comprehend in those first awful minutes. Like everyone, we simply could not believe what we were seeing then, or throughout the day. I went to find my wife Kathy, who had a quiet place in a university library where she had been working on an article she was writing. I remember seeing her across the room and thinking that she was still in the “old world” and I had crossed over into this new and still uncertain but more threatening world; she was the first person I told who had not previously heard. I remember as well the e-mails from overseas friends, expressing sympathy and solidarity. Their heartfelt gestures of caring made a major impact on me then and it has affected my response to tragedies in other countries ever since. After the Nov. 26 bombings in Mumbai, for example, I was on the phone to friends in India that night, offering support. This was largely because of those who called or e-mailed me after 9/11 and the comfort that those contacts provided me during such a frightening and bewildering period. There are many lessons we can take from 9/11, both as individuals, as a campus community and as an institution. Many of them have been discussed this week, and rightfully so. But on a personal level, I am reminded that communicating simple caring in times of crisis resonates deeply with those in crisis. It certainly aided me, and that is a debt I will always strive to “pay forward” to those in need.