VOLUME 119, ISSUE 150 | FRIDAY, MAY 3, 2019
S T U D E N T S W A I T ING OUT A TITLE IX INVESTIGATION FEEL STUCK IN PAINFUL PURGATORY
By London Gibson e v e n months after she said she was sexually assaulted, Sara Ross was just trying to forget. Forgetting became a lot harder when she found out the person she filed against was switching into one of her classes, and there was nothing she could do to stop it. Ross, a Plan II and social work sophomore, didn’t initially report her assault to UT’s Title IX Office, but when the Office was told about it and asked her to come in for an interview in October, she decided to move forward with an investigation, thinking it could give her protection from sharing a classroom with him. She was given a no-contact directive, which is standard for the investigation period of a Title IX case and means neither person is allowed to contact the other. Some time later, however, Ross realized this didn’t mean she had any protections in class. “What I didn’t realize and what I was not told is that no-contact directives don’t cover classes and discussion sections,” Ross said. “It was like, if you don’t want to be in classes with him, that’s on you to figure out. I was so just upset and devastated.” The interim period for a Title IX investigation is difficult for many students, who feel stuck in limbo while they wait for a
eddie gaspar | the daily texan staff Plan II sophomore Sara Ross’s Title IX case initially didn’t protect her from the person she filed it against from switching into one of her classes. The no-contact directive can be unsubstantial in smaller majors such as Plan II.
@LondonGibson
resolution. But investigations can sometimes last several months, turning this limbo period into a painful purgatory for students sharing spaces on campus with those they accuse of assault. Title IX Coordinator Krista Anderson said in some cases the Office can intervene when students have classes together, but moving them depends on a variety of factors, including whether or not there are alternative classes to move them into. “We take into account that when both parties are in the same class together, it can potentially cause additional stress, trauma and emotional strain,” Anderson said. “We will work with the academic college or program to help assess available academic options for the person making the request while also balancing fair and equitable alternatives for all of the involved parties.” The no-contact directive Ross thought would protect her from sharing a classroom with the person she filed against only applies to direct, intentional contact between the two people involved, Anderson said. “What a no-contact directive is not able to do is … expect people to not be in certain places,” Anderson said. “Technically, both parties could, especially if they have similar schedules and they have classes in similar areas around campus, they may see each other. And that is not a violation of the no-contact directive.” Ross ended up switching out of the class after the person she filed against was admitted. She said if her investigation doesn’t end
up in her favor, she might drop out of the Plan II program. At about 170 sophomores, the major is so small she worries she will just have the same problem in the future. Already running behind on her graduation plan because of stress after the initial incident last spring, Ross said she is concerned that if she has to keep switching out of classes it may take her even longer to graduate. “I just want something that says we can’t be in classes together,” Ross said. “That’s literally all I wanted when I decided to give his name and start the investigation process.” Checking over her shoulder Ayana D’Aguilar, a Plan II, Islamic studies and South Asian Languages & Culture senior, also had a class in the same building as the student she filed a report against. She said she spent every minute of her time checking over her shoulder. Just minutes after the emails notifying both parties of the Title IX investigation were sent out to both him and her, she ran into him. “I could see it on his face, he was furious,”
“I was so scared, I just flew into the nearest bathroom and had a panic attack ... I don’t even know how to explain just how difficult it was for me to physically enter that space.”
TITLE IX
page
— AYANA D’AGUILAR PLAN II SENIOR
2
CAMPUS
By Alyssa Weinstein @WeinsteinAlyssa
Editor’s note: A non-student source in this story requested her name not be published out of fear of retaliation. The Daily Texan is using the pseudonym “Betsy” upon her request. The government should not be in control of citizens’ rights to carry a gun, said Dana Loesch, conservative commentator and NRA spokesperson, at an event on campus Thursday. In a speech hosted by UT’s Young Conservatives of Texas and Young America’s Foundation, Loesch spoke about Second Amendment rights and issues, gun violence and personal freedoms, and said the backlash against gun rights is driven by fear. “People are scared to be in
charge of their own affairs and they’re scared to be individuals,” Loesch said. YCT chairman Saurabh Sharma said it was important to have Loesch come to talk to students because of how prevalent the gun debate is on campus. “We see continuous efforts to attempt to repeal campus carry at UT and activism regarding this issue,” said Sharma, a biochemistry senior. “(YCT) thinks Loesch is very effective at talking about (gun) issues, making the case for the constitutional rights we all hold and expanding the case to the greatest stability we can.” In the two-hour discussion, Loesch said the “defenseless,” such as women and schoolchildren, should have their lives protected by firearms and should not be penalized for their misuse by others. She
said legislation that restrict people’s access to guns — like that proposed after recent school shootings, such as Parkland — unfairly limits people who need firearms to defend themselves. Additionally, Loesch shared personal stories from her childhood about gun use, including an incident where firearms were used to defend the women in her family against abusive men. The event drew a handful of protesters, including Betsy, a 1981 alumna of UT. Betsy, who is anti-campus carry and anti-open carry, was there to protest the NRA. “I believe the NRA has entirely too much power in American politics,” Betsy said. “They’re artificially affecting the gun laws and the safety of Americans by denying us the free right to be safe in schools and in public places.”
NRA
page
3
angela wang | the daily texan staff Conservative activist Dana Loesch spoke in support of limited government and expanded interpretation of Second Amendment rights during an event at the Hogg Building on Thursday evening. The lecture is part of a series hosted by the Young Conservatives of Texas, with support from Young America’s Foundation.