The Eagle -- April 22, 2010

Page 1

BABY MAMA Jennifer Lopez hits some ‘bumps’ along the way in her return to the big screen SCENE page 7

American University's independent student voice since 1925

the EAGLE WWW.THEEAGLEONLINE.COM

NEWS BUCKS BUY FOOD

page 3

EDITORIAL

ANDREW MERLUZZI / THE EAGLE

Issac Stone shows how Wall Street’s ways affect as far away as Alabama page 5

STAYING IN SCHOOL — AU’s freshman-to-sophomore retention rate has fluctuated over the past 10 years. This year’s retention rate jumped from 88.4 percent in 2007 to 2008 to 90.5 percent in fall 2009.

By JULIA RYAN Eagle Staff Writer AU is maintaining higher retention rates than ever before in the university’s history, according to statistics recently released

by AU’s Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. AU’s freshman-to-sophomore retention rate was 90.5 percent from fall 2008 to fall 2009, a 2.1 percent increase from the 88.4 percent freshman-to-sophomore

retention rate from 2007 to 2008. The retention rate five years earlier, from fall 2001 to fall 2002, was 87.3 percent. Karen Froslid-Jones, the director of the Office of Institutional Research and Assessment, attributes the rise in retention to an overall stronger student population. “Graduation rates and retention rates are often associated with student quality,” FroslidJones said in an e-mail. “As our student body [becomes stronger], more students opt to stay at AU and graduate.” The university’s retention rate has been fluctuating for the past 10 years but has shown an upward trend overall, according to the Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. AU admitted 43 percent of the 16,934 students who applied — more than 10 percent lower than last year’s admissions rate. There were 13 percent more students applying for AU than last year. Historical comparisons The Office of Institutional Research and Assessment also celebrated the 40th year of the publication of the Reference Book by

SPRING AWAKENING AU field hockey team uses spring games to prepare for fall

publishing statistics from the first edition of the Reference Book in 1971. The Office puts out an Academic Data Reference Book towards the end of every school year with numbers for enrollment, admissions, retention and graduation. It gives students and the rest of the AU community statistics about a wide variety of academic and campus-life issues. The 1971 edition of the Reference Book showed a much different AU from the school it is today. Graduation rates are much higher now than in 1971. The four-year graduation rate in 1971 was only 45 percent, compared with 71 percent in 2010. In addition, total student enrollment has significantly decreased in the past 40 years — from 15,441 students in 1971 to 12,705 students today. AU also admitted a higher perTotal Enrollment Admissions Rate Freshman-to-Sophomore Retention Rate Four-year Graduation Rate Average Class Size Total Teaching Faculty Average Faculty Salary

By STEFANIE DAZIO and JULIA RYAN

page 6

Eagle Staff Writers

PITCHLESS Nats’ starters need to go deeper in ballgame for team’s success

SCENE ‘OHM’ MY GOD Different methods and studios for people tired of the same old yoga page 7

TODAY’S WEATHER

HI 72° LO 45° Cloudy, with a slight chance of showers FRIDAY HI 69° n LO 47°

SATURDAY HI 66° n LO 54°

the EAGLE 252 Mary Graydon Center 4400 Massachusetts Ave. N.W. Washington, D.C. 20016 Newsroom: 202-885-1402 Advertising: 202-885-1414, x3 Fax: 202-885-1428 E-mail: editor@theeagleonline.com Classifieds: adbox@theeagleonline.com

n

centage of students in 1971 than in 2010. About 75 percent of prospective students were admitted in 1971. AU expects to enroll about 1,500 first-year students this fall and 300 transfer students, according to a memo to the campus community by President Neil Kerwin. AU’s increased selectivity and decreased student population reflects the school’s improvement over the years, according to Froslid-Jones. “AU has become an increasingly competitive institution that attracts high-quality students,” Froslid-Jones said. “As the overall quality of the institution increased, the interest in going to AU increased.” Froslid-Jones said the university has become more selective n

see ENROLLMENT on page 3

January 1971 15,441 74.9% 77.6% 45.5% 26.6 357 $14,466

March 2010 12,705 53.2% 90.5% 71.2% 22.8 571 $92,619

AU wins third place in national recycling contest

SPORTS

page 6

VOLUME 84 ISSUE 49

AU retention rate at record high

AU brings EagleBucks to the Whole Foods in Tenleytown

A CASE OF GREED

APRIL 22, 2010

STEFANIE DAZIO / THE EAGLE

BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES — Concerned AU students ask questions during the Student Advocacy Center-sponsored panel on recent changes to the Student Conduct Code. The Code now allows AU to discipline students for off-campus behavior.

AU took third place out of 266 schools nationwide in the RecycleMania Competition with a cumulative recycling rate of 64.9 percent, according to Housing and Dining Programs. California State University-San Marcos placed first with 71.82 percent, and New Mexico State University came in second with 69 percent. AU’s recycling rate was the highest for all participating D.C. colleges. Georgetown University came in second with 42.5 percent, and the Catholic University of America came in third with 33.2 percent. This is AU’s first year participat-

ing in the 10-week competition that ranks schools based on the amount recycled per capita, the total amount recycled and other recycling rates, according to RecycleMania’s Web site. “I think it is awesome that AU has placed third in the RecycleMania 2010 competition, especially with this being our inaugural year of participation,” Assistant Director of Operations for Housing and Dining Sophia Benedicktus said in an e-mail. “AU strives to be a sustainable institution and to be at the forefront of leadership as it relates to being green.” AU adopted a zero-waste policy in February that may have contributed to its high ranking in the competition. “In nature there is no waste. The

Changes to Conduct Code apply off campus Letts Hall elevators By STEFANIE DAZIO Eagle Staff Writer AU students can be disciplined by the university for off-campus misconduct that does not necessarily violate local, state or federal laws beginning June 15, according to recent changes to the Student Conduct Code. AU revised its Conduct Code to give the university the power to take disciplinary action “when, in the judgment of university officials, a student’s alleged misconduct has a negative effect on the university’s pursuit of its mission or on the well being of the greater community.” The Student Advocacy Center hosted a forum on Tuesday to discuss the changes with a panel of administrators, including Vice President of Campus Life Gail Hanson, Assistant Vice President and Dean of Students Rob Hradsky and Department of Public Safety Chief Michael McNair. The changes come as AU is looking to pass its 10-year Campus Plan. Local Advisory Neighborhood Commissions have been putting pressure on AU to revise its policy on off-campus conduct, saying that they will not support the Campus Plan without the Conduct Code changes. The campus plan must be approved by the D.C. Zoning Commission, with which ANCs hold a “fair amount of clout,” Hanson said at the panel. An ANC written report and recommendation holds “great weight”

with the Board of Zoning, but the Board makes the final decision, according to D.C. Municipal Regulations. “It’s very difficult to get those approvals if the Advisory Neighborhood Commissions in your area believe that you are not good citizens,” Hanson said. “Our ANCs have made it pretty clear that unless we put into our Code some discretionary authority to adjudicate misconduct off-campus ... they were going to withhold an endorsement of our campus plan.” Currently, AU can only discipline students cited by police or if their behavior is clearly endangering or

threatening AU staff, administrators or students. Since the Code says all violations of local, state and federal laws are also violations at AU, students can be punished for their off-campus behavior, according to the Code. Hradsky said at the panel that the majority of undergraduates living off campus do not cause problems. He said there were about a dozen complaints this year, mostly about rental houses, including one with multiple and repeated violations. “But now, we’ve hit a wall,” Hanson said. “We’ve used everything in our disposal and in some instances, it’s not been enough. There have been a n

see CONDUCT on page 2

Conduct Code Jurisdiction “Generally, the university will take disciplinary action for on-campus infractions of the Code. However, the university may take disciplinary action for off-campus infractions of the Code when a student’s behavior threatens or endangers the safety and well-being of the campus community; when a student is the subject of a violation of local, state or federal law; or when, in the judgment of university officials, a student’s alleged misconduct has a negative effect on the university’s pursuit of its mission or on the well being of the greater community. [Revised and effective June 2010]” “Examples of Prohibited Conduct include: violations of local, state, or federal law; intentionally or recklessly destroying or damaging the property of others; disorderly conduct or interfering with the rights of others; illegal gambling or gaming, as defined by state or federal law; willfully failing to comply with the directions of university officials, acting in performance of their duties; attempting to engage in any prohibited conduct.” Information from a brochure distributed at the Student Advocacy Center forum.

n

see RECYCLE on page 3

in need of overhaul, could take months By ALLIE MOONEY Eagle Staff Writer Facilities Management and Housing and Dining Programs are working together to take the first steps in addressing a rash of elevator outages affecting Letts Hall South this semester. Both elevators in Letts South have experienced 22 separate problems since Jan. 1 of this year, but budgeting and extensive planning will delay any immediate large improvements on the system. “Housing and Dining Programs has made several attempts to address the Letts elevator issue by notifying Facilities Management of the problem,” Sophia Benedicktus, assistant director of Operations for Housing and Dining, said in an e-mail. Facilities Management is looking into fixing the elevators, which they said have several problems. “There’s some major components that need work,” said William Suter, the director of Facilities Management. Facilities Management must complete the engineering of the project before knowing what impact the renovation will have on the building.

The office must design plans and then select a contractor who will bid to restore the elevators. This planning process could take as long as seven months, meaning no one will be working in Letts elevator shafts for some time, according to Suter. Elevators are in much higher demand in dorms than in other types of buildings, according to Suter. This causes the elevators’ components to wear out faster than elevators with more typical usage. Suter has worked at AU for 16 years and has seen replacements of cables, main computer software and door controllers, but he has yet to see complete renovation of the elevators. Elevator renovations cannot be contracted until a comprehensive package is created, which would detail all the repairs and changes to be made to the elevator system. “Sometimes we get surprised, and we have to re-think things,” Suter said. “So right now we have money programmed out to do that study and to write the contract documents.” The project to physically repair the elevators could take about nine n

see ELEVATORS on page 3


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.