New Biden proposal addresses transgender athletics

BY NICOLE GE

On April 6, the Biden Administration and the U.S. Department of Education proposed a rule that offers educational institutions a new framework for formulating eligibility standards for transgender studentathletes. The proposed policy allows schools to create their own policies while ensuring that all students have equal opportunities in sports. However, the new rule has ignited controversy regarding the extent to which transgender athletes should be allowed to participate in sports alongside cisgender girls and women.

The proposal requires universities and K-12 schools, who receive federal funding to take into account age, level of competition and the nature of a sport when developing policies that would prevent transgender student athletes from competing. For example, basketball and tennis may warrant different restrictions due to varying physical demands. Nevertheless, the proposal forbids outright bans against transgender athletes, allowing them to compete in sports depending on the school’s policies and discretion. The U.S. Department initiated the proposal to alleviate uncertainty surrounding the eligibility of transgender students in sports and to provide clarity for students, parents and coaches.

women. However, since August 2022, the NCAA has required athletes to meet required specific testosterone levels that vary by sport.

The ongoing debate regarding transgender athletes highlights the challenges of balancing inclusivity and fairness in sports. Some individuals are concerned that including transgender athletes in women’s sports may violate Title IX, which aims to promote equality and fairness in sports.

A key issue in this debate is whether transgender girls possess a testosteronebased advantage over cisgender girls, which could potentially undermine fair competition. If this is the case, it is argued that Title IX should be used to protect the rights of cisgender girls and women, and to ensure fairness in competition in sports.

“There is a biological difference between transgender women and cisgender women,” track and cross country runner Lily Fang said. “I believe the best way to have transgender athletes compete in sports is to create a new division for them.” athletes do have an unfair advantage in competition. While some studies suggest that transgender women may have a performance advantage over cisgender women, other research has shown that hormone therapy and testosterone suppression, which has been implemented at the collegiate level, can significantly decrease muscle mass, bone density, and other physical characteristics, schools to legally restrain transgender athletes from elite and collegiate sports through their enforced policies.

The proposal would prevent schools from targeting transgender athletes, but wouldn’t combat transphobia.

The proposal marks the first time the government has directly addressed this issue. This is an important first step toward finding a solution that balances fairness and inclusivity while protecting transgender students’ access to sports.

“My main opinion is that it’s not a good law,” Lynbrook Gender and Sexuality Alliance member Charlotta “Charlie” Dai said. “Although it would prevent schools from directly targeting transgender athletes, it would not have the effect needed to combat the rampant transphobia against transgender athletes.”

The National Collegiate Athletic Association has already made changes to rules regarding the eligibility of transgender female student-athletes to compete. In 2022, transgender women need to have taken a testosteronesuppressing treatment for a year before competing against other cisgender

This idea falls in line with the fairly recent ruling by the International Swimming Federation, which banned transgender women from competing in women’s events in June 2022. The ruling came three months after Lia Thomas, a transgender woman on the University of Pennsylvania’s swim team, won the NCAA Division I swimming championship in the 500-yard women’s freestyle, highlighting the issue of balancing equity and inclusivity in sports. FINA’s solution to maintaining an inclusive environment was to establish a new, “open” category for transgender women to compete in in the future. The public response to the ruling was divided, similar to the reaction to the Biden proposal. Some argued that the ban was discriminatory towards transgender athletes and lacked scientific evidence to support it.

“If a person identifies as a woman, then they are a woman, and if a man identifies as a man, then they are a man,” Dai said. “Title IX is against sex-based discrimination, and to discriminate against transgender athletes would be to violate Title IX.”

Past research has led to inconclusive evidence over whether transgender women