Issue 5, 2011

Page 1

Seniors gain home field advantage by

by

The senior class was prepared to undergo two firsts this June: don navy blue gowns and hats and graduate on the West Valley Community College field. However, due to the recent lawsuit filed by Lynbrook Monta Vista United (LMU) challenging the construction of the Track and Fields and Lights Projects, the senior class will instead be graduating on its home field this June. After 16 months of deliberation, the Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD) Board of Trustees approved the highly-anticipated Track and Fields and Lights Projects at a Board of Trustees meeting on Dec. 16. The Board finalized the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), a document which explains the effects that the Track and Fields and Lights Projects will have on the environment. After the finalization, there was a 30 day period when opposing groups had the opportunity to file legal challenges against this project. On Jan. 18, LMU filed a placeholder lawsuit challenging the compliance of the Track and Fields and Lights Projects with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. CEQA ensures that the project follows a protocol which requires thorough analysis and public input. LMU has hired an attorney who specializes in CEQA cases. By Jan. 28, LMU must supply the specifics of its lawsuit. This lawsuit results in the delay of the actual construction to the Lynbrook field. Principal Gail Davidson speculates that it would take an estimated six to nine months for the lawsuit to go through, and from there, the school can act accordingly

eeshaKHARE & vickyRO

Their parents were hiding behind the curtains. Their teachers looked at them with knowing smiles. Their peers suspected it, but the winners themselves had no idea. On Jan. 12, two representatives from the Intel Science Talent Search came to announce the semifinalists. Though the parents of the semifinalists had been notified one week in advance, the news was kept a secret, giving the students a surprise upon hearing their names announced. This year’s four semifinalists are seniors (from top to bottom) Linda Xu, Julian Huang, Andrew Ma and Jennifer Chen. Each semifinalist was greeted by their parents and received an over-sized check for $1,000. Principal Gail Davidson explains, “As a school, we are very proud of our accomplishments. These students truly demonstrate the values of the Lynbrook vision where they learn passionately, apply their knowledge and contribute purposefully.” She explains how these students serve as role models to the younger classes and says, “After these assemblies, students go to their science teachers and ask, ‘how can I participate? How can I get started?’ This is how you build a program and plant the seed for further exploration. Students know that it is possible to achieve these same goals.” Xu, who started her project a mere month prior to the competition’s deadline, knows that sometimes thinking of a topic is the easiest part. She became interested in astronomy after gazing into the night sky and seeing the brilliant stars during a science camp this past summer. After formulating a topic, she worked on her project for at least five hours every day. Xu says, “I was pulling an all-nighter E

EL

LL

IE AN

E RN

IC

EP

R—

see INTEL pg2 GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION BY NAMRATA SINGH AND DIANA DING

sahilaJORAPUR & laurenTAI

D

Majority in favor of weekly Pledge recitation Lynbrook Speech and Debate team present discussion over Pledge of Allegiance by

charuMEHRA & sonikaSUBRAMANIAN

On Monday, Jan. 10, Lynbrook’s Speech and Debate team put together a video that addressed the issue of whether Lynbrook should say the Pledge of Allegiance or listen to the daily ‘This day in history…’ announcement. The four debaters, seniors Alan Kao, Vikram Kanth, Aditya Majumdar, and Rohit Unni presented opposite sides of the issue, with evidence to back up their arguments. The idea for the debate originated from science teacher Amanda Alonzo, who brought up the request for review to the Advisory Council (AC). The AC is a board of teach-

ers at Lynbrook that help take decisions regarding the school and its activities, similar to the Legislative Council of students. As Alonzo put it, “I proposed the idea to the AC because the science teachers came to me expressing their concern about the way that the Pledge was being conducted; it was not given enough time or respect.” The AC mulled over the idea during their summer sessions before deciding to talk to Ryan Lawrence, the Speech and Debate coach. In order to get a more comprehensive view on the matter, Principal Gail Davidson asked him and the members of the debate team to put together a mock debate on the

issue of the Pledge. Davidson said the idea to give the students the chance to get involved in the debate was that of Assistant Principal Ellen Reller. Lawrence, in turn, approached Speech and Debate copresidents Alan Kao and Aditya Majumdar about arranging a debate. They invited Debate co-captains Rohit Unni and Vikram Kanth to join the debate. The debate was arranged for Jan. 3, the Monday that students came because from Winter break. “We were really hesitant about taking away a tutorial from our students,” says Davidson. But due

see PLEDGE pg2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Issue 5, 2011 by the Epic - Issuu