Volume 2.
Issue 1.
The Falcon
A Keen Eye For News
IN THIS
ISSUE
Monday, January 14th, 2012
The Falcon is back for 2013
thefalconat.tumblr.com
College Night News Popular superhero’s most famous series cancelled page 3 page 2
Ribbon Hanging & featured spotlight
Do you know the defi n i t i o n of i n sani t y? CAMPUS
CROSS
Resonate Worship (BCM) January 15, 8pm –9pm BCM Dark Knight Rises on Big Screen January 16, 6:00pm–8:30pm Anna Irvin SGA Exec. Meeting January 16, 3:30pm–4:30pm SGA conference room Faculty Senate Mtg. January 18, 2pm – 2pm Merrill Rm NPC Sorority Retreat January 19, 10:00am–4:30pm Comer Auditorium & Farmer Hall
Spectrum Meeting January 21, 7pm – 8pm Morgan 203
Submit announcements facebook.com/ thefalconmontevallo
by Andrew Meechum Associate Editor “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” - Albert Einstein The shooting rampage by a disturbed young man in Newtown, Connecticut one month ago today has stirred loud, and often heated, debates across the country on gun control, mental health and school safety. How about we take a few minutes and examine these issues. Gun Control On the topic of gun control let’s first look at the Second Amendment to The Constitution: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
shall not be infringed. Anti-gun advocates are often quick to argue the Second Amendment applies to Militias and doesn’t imply every citizen has a right to bear arms, especially in large quantities. If we step back and look at how the amendment was written, and take into account that English as a language has evolved over time, we can see that this argument is invalid. The founders spent a great deal of time, and experimented with numerous layouts, in an effort to make the amendment as concise and clear as possible. In the Annals of Congress we can see that James Madison’s original draft began, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” After several rewrites the 1st Congress settled on the wording we see in the Bill of Rights today. However, the language stating the people’s right to bear arms and the govern-
ment’s inability to infringe on those rights remains to this day as a testament to how impassioned the founders were about this topic. If we look at the grammar of the Second Amendment we can see that the clause about militias and the clause about the rights of the people are separated by the second comma. This fact is supported by the Supreme Court in their landmark decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008). Given that ruling, the Second Amendment could be read as two separate ideas: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, shall not be infringed.” “The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” Should anyone look closely enough at The Constitution they would soon realize the Second Amendment is the only right we the people have that gives us (the people)
the power to protect all of our other rights from those who would take them from us (tyrannical government). Recently, Stanislav Mishin, a contributor to Russia’s Pravda newspaper and a witness to a country with little to no gun rights wrote, “For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but [in] reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position.” Mental Health There is no doubt we have a mental health crisis in this country. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimates that one in four people in America have a mental health issue. But what classifies as a mental health issue and how will tying mental health to the purchase of firearms be effective? The Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition, (DSMIV), is widely accepted as the leading encyclopedia of mental disorder diagnosis. Mental health professionals, insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies as well as legislators regularly use the DSM-IV. The DSM-IV contains over 300 different types of mental illnesses. Should legislation pass tying mental illness to whether someone can own a gun pass, it is quite possible that nearly all of us would be stripped of our arms. For example, if a new mother battles with a particularly bad case of postpartum depression she may meet DSMIV criteria for having a “mental illness”. While postpartum depression is generally a temporary and treatable issue, new legislation will invariably be too vague in its meaning or interpretation that it could be used to disarm mothers and strip them of their constitutional rights. continued page 5
The Falcon guide to happiness: an introduction
by Kyle Jones Editor-In-Chief
There are many things in this world that we believe bring us happiness, and for each person those things differ, whether they be material, physical or emotional. For our parents; money, job security or their children’s happiness are assumedly what may make them happy. For those of us ranging from 18-23 what really makes us happy? For that mat-
ter, what is happiness and how do we achieve it? With happiness being defined as “a state of well-being characterized by emotions ranging from contentment to intense joy” we get a sense that it is an easy thing to obtain, and something we’ve all experienced, but is it so simple? With 44 percent of American college students reporting feeling symptoms of depression, how do we separate what makes us happy and what is simply distracting us from our issues or life in general. In the coming weeks we will be exploring what makes our generation happy, and what actually brings us true happiness. Is happiness a moment or object
that brings us joy for a short amount of time or is it a broader and deeper term and state of being we must work to achieve and once found cultivate into a permanent state of mind? In Buddhism, two definitions for happiness are provided. One of these is in relation to an object and the other is in regards to the state of mind of the feeling itself. The first defines happiness as the experiencing of something in a satisfying manner, based on believing that it is of benefit to ourselves, whether or not it actually is.The second defines happiness as that feeling which, when it has ended, we wish to meet with it once more. In this series we will explore and
experiment with both aspects, exploring topics of happiness ranging from material things to intrapersonal things
like love/relationships, like to know what makes money, drugs, tech- you happy. Let us know nology, health, music, via facebook or twitter. success and family. For now we’d