Vol. 168, Issue 8 | December 4 – December 20, 2019 | City College of San Francisco | Since 1935 | FREE
Students Struggle to Be Included in Campus Democracy
→
→
BOT
→
CHANCELLOR
→
→ CLASSIFIED
AFT 2121
ASC
SEIU 1021
(Associated Students Council)
DCC
Classified Senate
(Department Chairperson Council)
ADMINISTRATION
→
→ STUDENTS
→
→
FACULTY
→
→
PGC (Participatory Governance Commitees)
AAEC
(Administrators Association Executive Council)
City College Decision-Making Process
Academic Senate By Claudia Drdul claudiadrdul@gmail.com
City College provides a number of ways for students to get involved and shape the direction of their school, but for many students, the labyrinth of committees and organizations remains difficult to understand or participate in. Marcos Cruz, a founding member of City College’s Student Assembly, formed the assembly to build a student-centered space for democratic participation, instead of using already established spaces like the Associated Student Council (ASC). Cruz has collaborated with ASC in the past, but has also criticised certain structural issues which prevent student participation through already formed systems. Both Cruz and Student Assembly member Win-Mon Kyi agree that if the Student Trustee position was paid and received a counted vote on the Board of Trustees (BOT), students would feel a greater sense that their choices affect decision making on campus. “I think we should have more student trustees...more student votes in there, not just one,” Cruz said. Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) states that “the governing board shall not take action on a matter having a significant effect on students until it has provided students with an opportunity to participate in the formulation of the policy
flow chart
or procedure or the joint development of recommendations regarding the action.” Although the CCR says that “one or more nonvoting students” should sit on the BOT, Student Trustees do “not have the right to vote and shall not be afforded the right to vote by a district.” This means that City College’s Student Trustee Bryan Daly plays an advisory role while all other members of the board have their votes included in the official count. The advisory vote itself is not actually considered to be a “right” but in fact a “privilege” that the local board of a college can choose to enact.
According to Student Chancellor Drew Min, PGC seats are “not the only committees” where student seats need to be filled. There may be upward of 80 unfilled student seats including those on the Academic Senate and several city oversight committees. PGC meetings are typically two hours in length and occur once a month between 1 and 5 p.m. during weekdays. Students, unlike administrators whose attendance is part of their job description and most faculty who receive reassignment time, are not monetarily incentivized to fill these positions. Cruz, who has attended several committee meetings said, “you shouldn’t expect a student to just waltz in and know Lack of Student Participation what’s going on or what to say, when it’s a voluntary position.” He added, “I’m not Commonly referred to as the “Nine saying we have to pay people like we pay Plus One” rule, the education code lists 10 administrators to be in the PGC, but it could different areas of which districts must receive be a college credit, it could be a scholarship… student input on, including “curriculum just that students are compensated one way development,” “courses or programs or another for the time they put in governing which should be initiated or discontinued,” for other students.” and “student services planning and development.” Student seats on Participatory Student-led Initiatives Governance Committees (PGC) fulfill this requirement. Project Survive and CCSF Collective However, student participation in member Vick Chung feels the system of these committees is considerably low. governance of City College is top down — Five PGC committees have one student suggestions are made by students, but the serving on them and three committees BOT decides, regardless of student input. have zero students serving, as listed on In order to combat this, Chung has City College’s website. been organizing Participatory Governance
Orientations in conjunction with student/ faculty organizations CCSF Collective and the Higher Education Action Team (HEAT) in order to fill spaces on various campus committees. During the month of November, Chung held several successful orientations and has a list of 21 students waiting to be appointed to committees. However, the process of doing so is not simple. Students must be appointed by the Associated Students Executive Council, which contains reprentatives of every campus center, so that a recommendation can be made on their behalf. However, for students to be appointed, the meeting convened must reach quorum, meaning that the minimum number of council members (currently nine) must be present in order to approve appointments. Chung believes that “because so many decisions [are] constrained to meeting quorum and being on the agenda” measures are not always passed in a timely member. Part of the incentive for students to join committees is priority registration, which for the Spring semester, has now passed. ASC President Angelica Campos believes the key to student participation in these areas is “to empower students to feel comfortable speaking in these spaces.” Campus Democracy continued on page 2