Monday, October 29, 2018 I Vol. 115 Iss. 13
WWW.GWHATCHET.COM
AN INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER • SERVING THE GW COMMUNITY SINCE 1904
Nearly 70 percent of students who study abroad pick European countries Average number of trustees at peer schools: 46 Number of trustees at GW: 21
Each icon represents two trustees EMILY RECKO | GRAPHICS EDITOR
Source: Multiple universities’ websites
Board of Trustees downsizes by about half in administrative effort to boost productivity board member’s workload has been impacted by having fewer members and what challenges officials have encountered since shrinking the board. He declined to say how officials encourage board members to be involved with GW after they have left. The board – which has 21 members – is roughly half the size of the 46-member average among the University’s peer schools. New York University has the largest board with 61 members, while the University of Pittsburgh has the smallest, with 36 voting trustees. Experts in higher education leadership said fewer trustees means that each person takes on more responsibilities, which could promote accountability and increase involvement in the board’s projects and committees. Richard Chait, a professor at the Harvard University Graduate School
of boards that would like to emulate George Washington but have not yet discovered circumstances favorable to After shrinking in size by about do so,” Chait said. “There’s more achalf over the past six years, the Board countability, more opportunities to deof Trustees is now the smallest of all 12 liberate and more engagement.” of its peer institutions. Rebekah Burch Basinger, a fundOver the past five years, the board raising and board education consulhas downsized from 43 members to tant at Basinger Consulting, said many 21 – a move officials said will increase schools retain a large board memberboard productivity and improve comship because trustees are generally munication between members. Higher expected to contribute between 40 and education experts said that while a 60 percent of a university’s fundraising smaller board could boost engagegoals. ment, cutting members could mean “If you have a big board, and you sacrificing diversity and donations. can have quite a few people who have “We’ve continued to reduce the significant wealth or have friends who size of the Board of Trustees to make are wealthy that they might be able to it more agile and responsive,” Nelson introduce to the school, that can be a Carbonell, the chairman of the Board really good thing,” she said. of Trustees, said at a Faculty Senate In years past, members of the Board meeting earlier this month. of Trustees have donated millions to Carbonell said the smaller group the University. Former trustee Mark makes quicker governance deciShenkman donated $5 million sions and ensures that members in 2014 to support career serare informed about the board’s “We’ve continued to reduce the size vices, and the same year, trustee activities. He added that downTucker gave $1 million of the Board of Trustees to make it Avram sizing allows officials to “enlist to the athletic department. more agile and responsive.” high-caliber trustees,” but he did Basinger said larger boards not say how. also have an easier time cultiNELSON CARBONELL He said he will evaluate the vating diversity among trustees CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEES size of the board depending on across various categories, inthe University’s needs and may cluding race, gender and sociocut or add more members. He economic status, simply because said the board’s focus on leaderthere are more positions to fill. ship – rather than philanthropy – en- of Education, said that when boards Cyndy English, the recording secreables it to have fewer members than have too many members, it becomes tary for the board of trustees at Tulane other schools who rely on their large difficult to carry out the group’s basic University, said that when the school’s membership to bring in donations. governing functions – like policy de- board size increased to 42 five years Carbonell declined to say how he liberation and strategy formulation – ago, the number of members was “unhas asked members to leave over the because there are too many people in manageable” because officials could years or how he has picked members the room. not adequately keep trustees on task to remain on the board, but he said Harvard has 32 members on its and divide work efficiently. Tulane oftrustees are elected to one four-year board of trustees, according to the ficials are currently looking to cut the term that can be renewed for a second. school’s website. board’s size from 39 to 35 within the He said the Committee on Governance “When you have a large board, it next two years, English said. and Nominations “has set the expecta- tends to feel much more like a lecture English said the chairman of Tution among Trustees for this to be the room,” Chait said. “It’s one-way com- lane’s board of trustees has been workstandard term of service.” munication. There are twice as many ing to reduce the size of the board since “Our trustees are among the Uni- people that are in pursuit of a fixed his election in July 2017 to give fewer versity’s greatest ambassadors, and amount of airtime.” members larger roles in the group’s their commitment and involvement in Chait called the board shrinkage a initiatives. GW doesn’t end with their term of ser- “commendable step” by the Univer“The general conversation is, ‘We vice,” he said. sity. don’t need to be bigger, we have to Carbonell declined to say how each “Frankly, I think there are a number work harder,’” she said.
KYLIE FRONCZAK REPORTER
SARAH ROACH ASSISTANT NEWS EDITOR
Students who study abroad are choosing to travel to Europe at the highest rate in recent history. About 68 percent of students who study abroad selected countries in Europe as their destination last academic year, up about seven percentage points from the previous year and the highest rate in at least five years. Officials said Europe has always been a top study abroad pick because students feel safer in countries that don’t often make headlines for war or disease, and European countries’ close proximity to one another could offer students more accessible and affordable travel opportunities. “Students may feel that Europe is ‘familiar’ intellectually/culturally,” Maritheresa Frain, the director of the Office of Study Abroad, said in an email. “Studying abroad for many students is a stretch outside of their comfort zone, so they may be acting conservatively to ensure their successful adaptation to a new culture.” Next to Europe, Asia was the second-most popular study abroad region, bringing in about 10 percent of students studying abroad. Latin America and the Caribbean came in at No. 3 with roughly 7 percent of students. Between 55 to 60 percent of students who study abroad nationally have chosen to travel to Europe since 2005, according to data from the annual Open Doors report conducted by the Institute of International Education. Frain said the high volume of students studying abroad in Europe is “not surprising” because Europe has always been a top study abroad location for GW. Between 2012 and 2017, roughly 60 to 68 percent of study abroad stu-
dents traveled to the continent annually. “GW students often learn about programs from other GW students,” Frain said in an email. “When study abroad alums come back and promote their program, they often motivate their fellow students to explore the same destination.” The University offers 153 study abroad programs in Europe, amounting to more than 50 percent of the University’s total program offerings. GW offers 43 programs in Asia, 33 programs in Latin America and the Caribbean, 18 programs in the Middle East and North Africa, 20 programs in Oceania and 22 programs in Sub-Saharan Africa, she said. She added that more students may have selected Europe recently because there are “geopolitical challenges” in other locations, like wars in the Middle East and pollution concerns in China. Frain said U.S. news coverage of events like Argentina’s economic crisis or violence in Brazil may lead students to think some countries are too unsafe to visit. She said Europe may also be the most popular study abroad destination because study abroad “has its roots” in Europe after countries tried to recruit students to take language and culture programs after World War II. In Europe, the United Kingdom was ranked as the top study abroad destination last academic year, followed by France, Spain and Italy. Outside Europe, China is ranked as the fifthmost popular study abroad site for students, according to institutional data. Frain said students may choose to study in the United Kingdom because the country houses “excellent universities,” like the universities of Oxford and See UNITED KINGDOM Page 2
SA leaders revive charge to examine controversial building names LINDSAY PAULEN & SARAH ROACH STAFF WRITERS
Student Association leaders are relaunching a task force to evaluate the controversial history behind campus building names after the group flatlined last year. Shelby Singleton, the SA’s vice president for diversity and inclusion, submitted a proposal to University President Thomas LeBlanc earlier this month to create a committee comprised of faculty, students and officials who will research building names – like the Marvin Center and Lisner Auditorium – that were named after former University figures who students say were discriminatory toward students of color. She said the group will first create a set of guidelines to evaluate the names and will eventually produce recommendations for building name changes, though no timeline has been established for the project. Singleton said that as a student of color, partaking in programs like diversity training in buildings named after figures with racist pasts “does not live up to our current values” of promoting an inclusive student body. “In a building that is our student center that houses our welcome center, food options, study centers, student org offices – it’s ridiculous that it’s in a center named after a man who did not respect a lot of student rights and identities on campus,” Singleton said. SA leaders originally formed a task force of student leaders last academic year to research building names with potentially discriminatory namesakes, with a particular focus on Cloyd Heck Marvin, a former University president who was a proponent of segregation. But the task force dissolved by the end of the academic year after a drop in participation and stalled research. Now, SA leaders are proposing a task force comprised of about 10
SARAH URTZ | HATCHET PHOTOGRAPHER
Shelby Singleton, the SA’s vice president for diversity and inclusion, submitted a proposal to University President Thomas LeBlanc earlier this month to create a committee comprised of faculty, students and officials who will research building names.
administrators, faculty and student leaders that will operate by the spring semester. LeBlanc has not yet responded to the SA’s proposal, but Singleton said he will reply in the next two weeks to decide whether he or SA leaders should spearhead the committee. Singleton said that in addition to examining the Marvin Center, students will also look into changing building names like Lisner Auditorium, which was built in 1943 using a donation from former trustee Abram Lisner. The theater was previously segregated and denied entry to black attendees, including the dean of Howard University’s medical school three years after its
debut – leading to a leaflet and boycotting campaign and canceled performances. The task force will evaluate how the University has changed in recent years – like the increasing diversity of its student body and student sentiment about building names – and will develop guidelines by the end of the academic year that will help the group determine whether the task force should recommend changing a building name, Singleton said. “It’s a really important part of our community to figure out what we stand for and what we expect out of each other,” Singleton said. SA President Ashley Le said involving administrators will make
the task force more effective than student-led committees because officials like LeBlanc have more influence over quick institutional change. She said that based on prior discussions over the past two months with LeBlanc and Nelson Carbonell, the chairman of the Board of Trustees, she believes officials and faculty have already indicated interest in evaluating building names. She said that when SA leaders submitted the task force proposal to LeBlanc, they included information about successful task forces at other schools, like Yale and Georgetown universities, that eventually inspired building name changes. “Looking at models from other
universities, like Yale, the president created that committee and six months later, the college was changed,” Le said. “Because it was an approach that remains a priority from the president at the top of the university, it was very effective.” Student leaders at institutions that created similar committees said including officials in name task forces is more effective than having student-led groups because administrators have stronger sway over institutional changes than students. Georgetown University renamed two of its buildings in 2015 that were named after former presidents who sold slaves to pay off university debt. Several other institutions, like Princeton University and the University of Texas at Austin, have also followed suit with their own building name changes. Yale University renamed one of its residential colleges in February 2017 because it was named for John C. Calhoun, an alumnus of the university and former U.S. vice president who said slavery was a “positive good” and promoted white supremacist policies. Saloni Rao, the president of the Yale College Council, said the task force comprised of students and administrators – which has since dissolved after renaming Calhoun College – can reconvene at any point to research new building names that students and officials may deem necessary to change. She said the task force developed guidelines, like what kinds of contributions a person made to Yale and what kind of legacy they left, that future officials and students can use as a basis for potential discussions about changing building names. “It’s frustrating sometimes at Yale that change can happen so slowly, but I do think there’s something to be said conversely for taking the time to consider the implications and the logistics for making any sort of monumental changes,” Rao said.