The Harvard Crimson The University Daily, Est. 1873 | Volume CXLV, No. 100 | Cambridge, Massachusetts | THURSDAY, october 11, 2018
Staff editorial PAGE 6
sports PAGE 8
news PAGE 5
Harvard should be applauded for the way it disciplined Chris Heaton.
Track star Gabby Thomas has been called prolific. Now she’s just a pro.
The Cambridge city government is urging locals to recycle more often.
Bacow Says Admissions Suit May Divide Campus Title IX In an email to University affiliates, Bacow insisted Harvard does not discriminate against “anybody” By kristine e. guillaume Crimson Staff Writer
Harvard affiliates gathered to celebrate the inauguration of University President Lawrence S. Bacow on Oct. 5 in Harvard Yard. kathryn s. kuhar—Crimson photographer
After Brett, An Uptick in Activism
Days before a lawsuit alleging Harvard College’s admissions practices are discriminatory heads to a high-stakes and high-profile trial, University President Lawrence S. Bacow warned Harvard affiliates not to let the suit create rifts between them. Bacow’s message — sent to students and alumni via email Wednesday — marked his first missivedirectly addressing the suit, which is slated to go to trial Oct. 15 in a Boston courthouse. Anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions brought the lawsuit against Harvard in 2014, during the latter half of former University President Drew G. Faust’s tenure. The suit charges that the College’s race-conscious admissions policies discriminate against Asian-American applicants — an allegation Har-
vard has repeatedly denied. In his Tuesday emails, Bacow acknowledged the case has the potential to “create divisions” among University affiliates onand off campus as the trial unfolds. “Reasonable people may have different views, and I respect the diversity of opinion that this case may generate. I would hope all of us recognize, however, that we are members of one community — and will continue to be so long after this trial is in the rearview mirror,” Bacow wrote. Bacow encouraged Harvard affiliates to “approach one another with mutual respect” despite possible differences of opinion. Though students, faculty, and alumni may hold varying views on Harvard’s admissions practices, Bacow’s stance is clear.
See bacow Page 5
‘A Thing I’ll Never Forget’ The HUDS Strike, Two Years Later
By ruth a. hailu By molly m. mccafferty
Crimson Staff Writer
Student activists across the University say they will lead campaigns to increase campus voting rates and will work even harder to combat sexual assault in response to Brett M. Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court last week. On Saturday, the Senate confirmed Kavanaugh as an Associate Justice by a 50-48 vote — one of the closest margins in United Stateshistory. Kavanaugh, the second Supreme Court judge appointed during the Trump administration, received the confirmation a few weeks after at least two women stepped forward to allege he had sexually assaulted them decades ago. The allegations spurrednational scrutiny, a federal hearing, and a series of anti-Kavanaugh protests on Harvard’s campus. A number of students interviewed by The Crimson said they are frustratedand disappointed by Kavanaugh’s confirmation.Several said the news was shocking but unsurprising. Students also said they are dissatisfied withthe waysome Harvard administratorshave respondedto the allegations. Harvard Law School Dean John F. Manning broke hisweekslong silence on the issue Monday when he sent an email to Law School students. But, though he wrote that the school wanted to support its students, he declined to take an official stance on Kavanaugh. “When I speak out as dean, I am understood to be taking a position on behalf of our Law School,” he wrote. “But Harvard Law School is a large, diverse community that does not speak with one voice, and I cannot speak for all of you.” Law School student Vail Kohnert-Yount, a member ofadvocacy group the Pipeline Parity Project, said she found Manning’s emailhypocritical given he previously spoke out in support of the judge after President Donald Trump nominated him over the summer. At the time, Manning wrote a glowing statement published on a Harvard website that lauded Kavanaugh’s teaching skills, among other traits. “He was willing to violate
Crimson Staff Writer
On Oct.5, 2016, hundreds of dining workers traded in their punch cards for picket signs, walked out of the dining halls and cafes on Harvard’s campus, and demanded contract improvements in the first campus-wide strike the University had seen since 1983. Twenty-two days later, union and Harvard representatives reached an agreement highly favorable to striking dining workers during dramatic, late-night negotiations held behind closed doors in an office building near campus. Now — two years later — the University and labor groups are still feeling the reverberations of the strike that shook campus.
See strike Page 4 annie e. schugart—Crimson photographer
Inside this issue
Harvard Today 2
By angela n. fu Crimson Staff Writer
The Faculty Council discussed a proposal to add additional course start times to the new schedule and heard a presentation on the lawsuit alleging Harvard’s admissions process is discriminatoryat its biweekly meeting Wednesday afternoon. Faculty of Arts and Sciences registrar Michael P. Burke presented a proposal to the Council — FAS’s highest governing body — that would allow courses that are scheduled from 12 p.m. to 2:45 p.m. or 3 p.m. to 5:45 p.m. to delay their start time by 45 minutes. If passed, the change would give students more time to eat lunch and would ensure courses aredistributed more evenly throughout the day. The proposal follows a short presentation Burke gave at the Oct. 2 meeting of the full Faculty, during which he spoke about some issues raised by the new schedule. The new system — implemented this fall after gaining Faculty approval in 2017 — extends the standard class block from 60 minutes to 75 minutes, adds 15 minutes of passing time
IOP FORUM EVEnt
News 3
By jamie d. halper Crimson Staff Writer
Harvard continues to face three separate federal investigations into its compliance with anti-sex discrimination law Title IX more than four years after the first complaint was filed. In 2014, two College students filed a complaint with the United States Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights alleging that the College’s sexual assault policies at the time violated Title IX, which underlies the University’s guidelines for investigating and adjudicating allegations of sexual misconduct. Since the 2014 filing, the University has overhauled its approach to sexual assault prevention and response on campus — changing its policies and separating its Title IX Office, which provides resources and education, from its Office for Dispute Resolution, which investigates formal Title IX complaints. The Crimson reported in 2017 that — on top of the 2014 complaint — there aretwo other ongoing federal investigations into Harvard’s compliance with Title IX: one probe into the College that officials launched in 2016,and one probe into the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences that the government opened in 2017. The federal government opened the 2016 investigation based on a complaint from an individual who claimed the College discriminated against him on the basis of sex during its efforts to addressa sexual assault complaint in which he was involved. The specific date of the sexual assault claim in question was redacted from documents provided by the Department of Education, as were many identifying details about the individuals involved. It isunclear whether the filer was the complainant or respondent in Harvard’s Title IX probe.
See federal Page 5
FAS Council Talks Admissions Lawsuit
SEE PAGE 3
See activism Page 4
Probes Are Still Ongoing
The Harvard Institute of Politics hosted a conversation with Wendy R. Sherman and Nancy Gibbs Wednesday at 6 p.m. chloe i. yu—Crimson photographer
Editorial 6
Sports 8
Today’s Forecast
rainy High: 66 Low: 56
between courses, and eliminates the tradition of “Harvard Time” which had allowed students to arrive seven minutes late to every class. It also requires departments to distribute their classes more evenly across the day and limits the times at which classes may begin. Burke said at the Faculty meeting that the most popular time slot for classes is between 12 p.m. and 2:45 p.m. Because dining halls originally opened at 12 p.m and closed at 2:15 p.m., many students missed lunch. On top of that, “Fly-By”, the cafe underneath Annenberg Hallthat provides upperclassman with bagged meals during the day, saw longer lines than usual. Harvard University Dining Services has since begun openingdining halls half an hour earlier at 11:30 a.m. in an effort to combat this problem. Council member David L. Howell called the suggested changes “commonsensical.” The Council will likely vote on the proposalat their next meeting before sending it off to the full Faculty in November for
See council Page 3
Visit thecrimson.com. Follow @TheCrimson on Twitter.
in selfish move