The Harvard Crimson - Volume CXLV, No. 106

The Harvard Crimson The University Daily, Est. 1873 | Volume cxlv No. 106 | Cambridge, Massachusetts | Friday, october 19, 2018

editorial PAGE 6

sports PAGE 8

news PAGE 3

Harvard should be deliberate in its efforts to plan for the next recession.

Football seeks an upset win over undefeated no. 18/23 Princeton.

Ed School Dean Bridget Terry Long outlines a forward-looking vision.

By Caroline S. Engelmayer and michael e. xie Crimson Staff Writers

A federal bill that could jeopardize Harvard’s controversial social group policy will almost certainly not become law before the end of this congressional term, experts say.

The bill — a suggested revision of the Higher Education Act called the PROSPER Act — contains a provision that would bar colleges and universities from penalizing students who join “recognized” single-gender social organizations.

Though it is unclear whether that provision would apply to Harvard in its current form, opponents of the sanctions hope to change the wording to ensure that it does affect the University.

If anti-sanctions advocates are successful and the bill passes, Harvard could be forced to choose between millions of dollars in federal research funding and its social group penalties.

The bill — voted out of the Committee on Education and the Workforce in the United States House of Representatives in Dec. 2017 — has not yet been scheduled to be discussed on the House floor or to be voted on by the full House.

The College’s sanctions —

which took effect with the Class of 2021 — bar members of unrecognized single-gender final clubs, fraternities, and sororities from holding leadership positions in recognized student groups, serving as the captains of varsity athletic teams, and from receiving College endorsements for certain prestigious fellowships like the Rhodes.

For now, it seems as if Harvard’s policy is relatively safe.

Political analysts say the chances the Higher Education Act passes under this Congress are slim.

Republicans, who introduced the bill and might be more likely to favor it, currently control the House of Representatives — but political pundits predict Democrats will regain that chamber’s majority in November.

Neal McCluskey, director of the Cato Institute’s Center for Educational Freedom, said he does not think there is “any chance” the bill — which contains far more than the social groups provision — passes before the end of this term.

Supporting the bill would be “an act of political suicide,” according to Barmak Nassirian, director of federal relations and policy analysis for the Ameri

See PROSPER Page 3

Asian-American Applicants Saw Lowest Admit Rate of Any Race From 1995 to 2013, Asian-American applicants saw an average admit rate of 8.1 percent, court filings show

Harvard Admissions Trial Hits Day Four who and what:

Admission By Racial Group 25 African American

Percent of applicants admitted

Anti-Sanctions Law Is Unlikely

See trial Page 3

Hispanic American

20

White Asian American

The College’s long-serving dean of admissions and financial aid William R. Fitzsimmons ’67 wrapped up his testimony Thursday morning.

15

10

Admissions officer Christopher J. Looby then stepped to the witness stand, followed shortly by Harvard Director of Research for Admissions and Financial Aid Erica J. Bever.

5

0

’00

’01

’02

’03

’04

’05

’06

’07

’08

’09

’10

’11

’12

’13

’14

’15

’16

’17

Class

By Shera S. Avi-Yonah and molly c. mccafferty Crimson Staff Writers

Over a nearly two-decade period starting in 1995, Asian-American applicants to Harvard saw the

lowest acceptance rate of any racial group that applied to the school, according to data presented in court Thursday as part of the Harvard admissions trial.

Data for that time peri-

Read more on thecrimson.com.

od — which begins with the admissions cycle for applicants to Harvard’s Class of 2000 and ends with the cycle for the Class of 2017 — show that Asian-American candidates on average saw an admission rate

Athletics Spike in H-Y Ticket Scalping Spurs Administrative Ire Debuts Cultural Training

By Camille G. Caldera, Juliet E. Isselbacher, and Ema R. schumer contributing Writers

­

Harvard’s Athletics Department launched 23 new workshops for students under its ‘Crimson360’ program By madeleine R. Nakada Crimson Staff Writer

Harvard’s Athletics Department has debuted 23 new initiatives for student athletes as part of a larger umbrella program titled “Crimson360” and meant to reflect the department’s revamped motto of “principled leadership, academic integration and competitive excellence.”

Crimson360, which kicked off last month with a back-toschool barbecue, features a mix of new and existing trainings for student athletes along four broad themes: leadership, community building, life skills, and professional development. The department created three of the workshops included in Crimson360 in direct response to a months-long internal cultural review it undertook over the past year.

The Athletics Department launched a cultural review in spring 2017 after a series of high-profile candals on the men’s soccer and cross country teams; members of both teams inappropriately rated their female counterparts for their looks and sexual appeal. Following the review, the department announced plans to implement mandatory sexual assault prevention and conflict resolution programs for athletes, unconscious bias trainings for Athletics staff and coaches, and “Diversity Dialogues” for the department as a whole.

The “Diversity Dialogues” and sexual assault prevention programs — as well as a

See athletics Page 3 Inside this issue

Harvard Today 2

Fall 2018 has seen a spike in student attempts to sell their tickets to the Harvard-Yale football game, spurring an emailed rebuke from administrators. anthony Y. Tao—Crimson photographer

Classroom to Table Opens Registration

By Sophia S. Armenakas and Isabel L. Isselbacher Contributing Writers

The popular “Classroom to Table” program — a College initiative that funds meals between undergraduates and faculty members around Harvard Square — re-opened its registration portal for the fall 2018 semester this past Monday.

Program administrator Kara-Sue D. Sweeney said students and faculty can now submit advance requests via the sign-up form on the Classroom to Table website. Administrators will fund gatherings that take place on Oct. 26 or later, she said.

Since its debut in 2015, Classroom to Table has exploded in popularity. Last semester, the program burned through its

News 3

Editorial 6

See tickets Page 5

SEE PAGE 5

yearly budget by early April, forcing its premature cessation — even after officials set a cap of two dinners per student. At the time, Harvard spokesperson Rachael Dane wrote in an emailed statement that administrators planned to prioritize finding funding for the program going forward.

In an email, Sweeney noted that “Classroom to Table” is constrained by finite resources. He did not specify this year’s budget.

“Program funding will be limited and we may not be able to accommodate all requests,” Sweeney wrote.

According to the program’s website, “Classroom to Table” will continue to provide up to

See meals Page 3

Sports 8

So many students have tried to sell their College-allotted tickets to the Harvard-Yale football game this year — a violation of Athletics Department policy that typically goes unnoticed and unpunished — that some resident deans have begun admonishing students over internal House email lists.

The Harvard ticketing website states that “Undergraduates can claim one ticket for their personal use. No guest tickets will be available for sale. Students may not sell their claimed ticket to a member of the general public or other students.”

“We take this [policy] seriously and expect our students to comply,” Athletics Director Robert L. Scalise wrote in an emailed statement.

Despite the policy, at least a hundred students have attempted to sell their tickets for amounts ranging from $25

to over $200. Most advertised their tickets on House email lists or on a public Facebook event page.

Maxwell K. Ho ’21 offered his ticket up for $115 “OBO” — slang for “or best offer” — over the Eliot House email list. He said he was unaware Harvard forbids resale.

“In my one year of experience, the game was the least fun part of the entire fiasco,” Ho said. “The $50 plus is worth a lot more to me as someone who is strapped for cash. I’d rather use that money to go to a restaurant or something of the like with my friends.”

Aside from financial motivations, students attributed the spike in ticket scalping to the fact that this year, in a break with tradition, the Game will be played not in Harvard Stadium but in Fenway Park. And, unlike in the Stadium, Harvard undergraduates will face strict ticketing rules in the famed Boston baseball shrine.

Juan Manuel Santos, former president of Colombia and Nobel Peace Prize laureate, spoke at the Institute Of Politics Thursday night. brendan j. chaupis—Crimson photographer

Today’s Forecast

mostly sunny High: 62 Low: 52

Visit thecrimson.com.

Follow @TheCrimson on Twitter.

ben and jerry

THE HARVARD CRIMSON |

October 19, 2018

Page 2

Harvard Today

For Lunch Dan Dan Noodles English Style Battered Local Fish Spinach Artichoke Grilled Cheese Sandwich

For Dinner Pepper and Sausage Pizza Beyond Burger Cheese Pizza

Today’s Events

in The Real World

TLA Presents: Laughter Hours IV Adams Pool Theater, 7:30 p.m.

Trump Says He Believes Khashoogi Is Dead, Citing Intelligence Reports

Get out of your mid-semester slump at this improv event hosted by Three Letter Acronym in the Adams Pool Theater.

In the latest development in the tortuous Khashoogi case, Trump has stated that he believes intelligence reports that suggest the journalist is dead — and that the Saudi government played a role in his killing.

Chicago on the Mainstage Loeb Mainstage, 7:30 p.m.

Bring out your inner drama queen at a student production of the musical Chicago, on the Loeb Mainstage starting today.

93 more ex-students accuse former USC gynecologist of sexual misconduct A construction crew works on Lamont Library roof. joshua y. chiang—contributing photographer

Daily Briefing

HRMDC Presents: Once Upon a Time Farkas Hall, 7:30 p.m.

Enjoy the Modern Dance Company’s fairytale-themed show this weekend, today and tomorrow evening.

Over a nearly two-decade period starting in 1995, Asian-American applicants to Harvard saw the lowest acceptance rate of any racial group that applied to the school, according to data presented in the Harvard admissions trial Thursday. A Crimson analysis of the dataset showed that Asian-Americans saw an average admit rate of 8.1 percent in that time period, white applicants saw an average admit rate of 11.1 percent, African-Americans 13.2 percent, and Hispanic-Americans 10.6 percent.

In other news, so many students are trying to sell their Harvard-Yale tickets this year that administrators are stepping in to admonish the undergraduates.

Another 93 women have come forward with sexual abuse allegations against Dr. George Tyndall, the gynecologist at USC’s Student Health Clinic. These accusations add to the more than 50 accusers who came forward this July. Tyndall served as USC’s only full-time gyncecologist for three decades.

Edmonton Girl Guide Sells Cookies in Cannabis Store Lineup If you’re doing a double take at this headline, yes, you read it right. When recreational marijuana was legalized in Canada on Wednesday, Elina Childs, a nine-year-old Girl Guide, took advantage of the celebrating folks’ munchies and sold 30 boxes of cookies in 45 minutes. Talk about enterprising.

Around the Ivies DARTMOUTH A number of racial slur and bias incidents have taken place at Dartmouth since the beginning of the fall semester, The Dartmouth reported Thursday. Two students found a racial slur written on an Asian student’s door early in the morning on Sept. 18 and another student found graffiti on her door, but it was not reported as a bias incident. The University is investigating the incidents.

PENN A number of Penn students may be evicted from their off-campus housing next week after their rental property was found in violation of Philadelphia zoning laws. A notice was posted on a building last month stating that the building exceeded the number of legal units. The company that owns the building did not respond to requests for comment. “I have no idea of what’s going to happen. I don’t even know how they are planning to address it,” one student resident said.

Columbia An Arts and Sciences report at Columbia found that substantial cultural and policy-level changes will be required to remedy “concerning disparities” along race and gender lines, the Columbia Spectator reported Wednesday. The report revealed concerns about Columbia’s ability to maintain long-term growth in the number of female and minority faculty members, especially given stagnant levels of growth in black and Latinx faculty over the past 10 years. The report outlines a series of recommendations to bolster diversity in hiring practices and to improve cultures of discrimination and harassment that primarily affect female and minority faculty.

The University Daily, Est. 1873

The Harvard Crimson Derek G. Xiao President Hannah Natanson Managing Editor Nathan Y. Lee Business Manager

Associate Managing Editors Mia C. Karr ’19 Claire E. Parker ’19 Associate Business Managers Dahlia S. Huh ’19 Max W. Sosland ’19 Digital Strategists Jamie D. Halper ’20 Caroline S. Engelmayer ’20 Editorial Chairs Cristian D. Pleters ’19 Emmanuel R. R. D’Agostino ’19

Staff for This Issue Arts Chairs Mila Gauvini II ’19 Grace Z. Li ’19

Design Chairs Morgan J. Spaulding ’19 Simon S. Sun ’19

FM Chairs Marella A. Gayla ’19 Leah S. Yared ’19

Multimedia Chairs Amy Y. Li ’20 Ellis J. Yeo ’20

Blog Chairs Lydia L. Cawley ’20 Stuti Telidevara ’20

Technology Chairs Nenya A. Edjah ’20 Theodore T. Liu ’20

Sports Chairs Cade S. Palmer ’20 Jack R. Stockless ’19

Copyright 2018, The Harvard Crimson (USPS 236-560). No articles, editorials, cartoons or any part thereof appearing in The Crimson may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of the President. The Associated Press holds the right to reprint any materials published in The Crimson. The Crimson is a non-profit, independent corporation, founded in 1873 and incorporated in 1967. Second-class postage paid in Boston, Massachusetts. Published Monday through Friday except holidays and during vacations, three times weekly during reading and exam periods by The Harvard Crimson Inc., 14 Plympton St., Cambridge, Mass. 02138 Weather icons made by Freepik, Yannick, Situ Herrera, OCHA, SimpleIcon, Catalin Fertu from flaticon.com is licensed by CC BY 3.0.

Night Editor Kenton K. Shimozaki ’19 Alison W. Steinbach ’19 Sarah Wu ’19

Design Editors Angela N. Fu ’20 Jacob Kleger ’20 Katie E. Wang ’20

Assistant Night Editors Kristine E. Guillaume ’20 Jamie D. Halper ’20

Photo Editors Caleb D. Schwartz ’20 Mariah D. Dimalaluan ’20

Story Editors Brittany N. Ellis ’19 Joshua J. Florence ’19 Hannah Natanson ’19 Claire E. Parker ’19

Editorial Editor Elijah T. Ezeji-Okoye ’20 Sports Editor Henry Zhu ’20

Corrections The Harvard Crimson is committed to accuracy in its reporting. Factual errors are corrected promptly on this page. Readers with information about errors are asked to e-mail the managing editor at managingeditor@thecrimson.com.

Page 3

THE HARVARD CRIMSON | october 19, 2018

prosper From Page 1

PROSPER Act Unlikely to Pass can Association of State Col leges and Universities.

He jokingly estimated the odds that the bill passes this term are “in negative territory.”

He and others pointed to the funding proposals in the bill as one main reason it will likely fail to become federal law.

The PROSPER Act could reduce some students’ ability to receive Pell Grants to help them pay for their college tuition and could restrict the amount of money undergraduates can take out in student loans.

Most Democrats oppose these provisions — and for Republicans, the legislation probably won’t rank among their top priorities.

Whether universities can legally penalize students’ social groups is of even less of a concern.

Many lawmakers likely see the section on social groups as “a relatively minor provision” compared to larger issues related to financial aid, said Jeffrey Andrade, a lobbyist for the McKeon Group and former Republican staffer for the Committee on Education and the Workforce.

Still, Kelley McNabb, communications director for the Committee on Education and the Workforce, said that the fact that the provision regarding social groups “appears in PROSPER indicates that lawmakers view this as a current and future significant issue.”

She declined to comment further on the bill’s chances of passing by the end of this Congress.

Another obstacle to passage could be that the bill’s final club provision appears to contradict Republicans’ emphasis on limited government, according to some analysts.

“A conservative majority that constantly talks about governmental overreach and governmental micromanagement of private affairs probably shouldn’t be chiseling

rules in marble on matters as internal to the administration of colleges and universities as how they handle fraternities or Greek life or social organizations,” Nassirian said.

Drumming up support from representatives is not the only hurdle the PROSPER Act must clear to become law.

Even if the bill advances out of the House of Representatives, the Senate would need to approve the legislation.

The Senate has not finished drafting its version of the PROSPER Act. Ultimately, the bill will likely garner mostly Republican support, experts said — meaning it would die in the House if Democrats take the majority.

The Senate, meanwhile, is unlikely to f lip blue in the coming election cycle.

With a divided Congress, not much is likely to get done in Washington — especially when it comes to bills that have failed to garner much attention anyway.

Still, at least one group of lobbyists are staking their hopes on the bill.

The Cambridge Coalition — comprising all-male final clubs the Fly Club, the AD Club, and the Porcellian Club, along with the Harvard chapters of fraternities Delta Kappa Epsilon, Sigma Chi, and Sigma Alpha Epsilon — sent representatives to the nation’s capital in spring 2018. While there, they urgeed lawmakers to support the legislation and imperil the College’s social group policies.

If the law does not pass, though, the fight for the fate of the social group policy has the potential to shift from Capitol Hill to the courthouse.

Some final club affiliates have previously said they would consider suing Harvard as a “last resort” to block the penalties. caroline.engelmayer@thecrimson.com michael.xie@thecrimson.com

Dean Long Reflects on First Months

By Lainey A. Newman ­

Crimson Staff Writer

Bridget Terry Long took the helm of the Harvard Graduate School of Education this summer at an inflection point for education around the country. U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos had discarded the Obama-era rule book on sexual assault policy and trumpeted school choice in primary and secondary education. The #MeToo movement had begun to hit academia. For the first time, the federal government passed a bill to levy taxes on some university endowments — a sign that higher education was under fire. A high-profile admissions lawsuit now in trial was challenging race-conscious admissions policies at Long’s own institution.

Now, three months into her tenure as dean, Long is beginning to implement her vision at a time when the future of education in America is in flux.

Long assumed her position as dean on July 1, the same day University President Lawrence S. Bacow began his role. Long came into the deanship with prior Harvard experience under her belt. As the first black woman to lead the Ed School, Long previously served as a professor of education and economics at HGSE. She was appointed to the National Board for Education Sciences by President Obama in 2010, and has been awarded honors from numerous organizations, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Once in the new position, Long said she prioritized becoming acquainted with the unique challenges of the job.

“Realizing that I’m only in month three, I think it is important to first just kind of take stock,” Long said in a recent interview. “Any good leader, even if you’ve been within the institution, you’re going to take time to listen.”

While taking the time to listen to others, Long has also used her position of leadership to publicly respond to issues of national importance, including the recent confirmation process of Supreme Court Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh.

On Sept. 28, the day after Christine Blasey Ford testified to the Senate Judiciary Com-

mittee alleging that Kavanaugh assaulted her when the two were in high school, Long emphasized in an email to HGSE affiliates the importance of universal respect. Long and Maritza S. Hernandez, an Ed School associate dean, wrote that all individuals have the right to live “free of harassment and unwanted attention or harm.”

“We also want all of you to know that you can find support here at HGSE,” they wrote. The email also listed resources both inside and outside of Harvard that individuals can consult if they have experienced sexual harassment or abuse.

Not all Harvard deans issued public statements in response to the hearings. John F. Manning

Any good leader, even if you’ve been within the institution, you’re going to take to listen.

Bridget Terry Long Graduate School of Education Dean

’82, dean of the Law School, stayed silent throughout the proceedings, earning criticism from some students. He eventually sent an email to Law School calling the preceding weeks an “extraordinarily painful and divisive chapter” in American history.

Long said she was unaware of any discussion among central administrators on what, if anything, to communicate to students and affiliates regarding the hearings or sexual assault more generally. Explaining her motivations behind the public message, Long said she believes she has the responsibility to speak out about the values of the institution she represents.

“The advice I’ve been given by many senior leaders both at Harvard and elsewhere is to speak out when you feel that the values of the institution are being put in jeopardy or need to be re-emphasized. And so that’s what I did, because I knew that there were people who were hurting,” Long said.

Long said, however, that in her new administrative role, she has been conscious of the limitations of her voice in rep-

resenting the totality of HGSE. “It is my job to elevate [the student] voice…but it’s not my job to speak for [the student],” Long said. “And so you have to walk this very careful line as dean to think carefully that, if you do speak, you could squash someone else’s right to speak for themselves.”

Long has also been adamant about defending other institutional values at the University that have recently come under attack.

Among these is the ongoing affirmative action lawsuit against Harvard, which Long said poses a threat to the environment that the University has cultivated. According to Long, the benefits of diversity far outweigh the drawbacks of affirmative action policies.

“I know, as a faculty member, when you have a rich mixture of people in the classroom, the ideas that come out and the way that people bounce off of each other is just so much better versus if you just had the same kind of person, from the same kind of background, from the same kind of school,” Long said.

The Education School, she said, stands firmly in support of affirmative action.

“We have to have diversity if we are actually going to produce good outcomes,” Long said. “We have doubled down on taking that stance. We have reaffirmed it.”

Long said she also intends to concentrate efforts in addressing the stereotype that universities only benefit the elite. She said she thinks Harvard should focus more on countering this perception.

Because of the Ed School’s specific focus on education, it is one of the most outward-facing institutions at Harvard, Long said. Attacks on higher education, she said, come from a lack of awareness and understanding of the positive impacts of such programs.

“Our impact is in schools and communities and nonprofits that are elsewhere,” Long said. “So we’re constantly proving the fact that there is value to what we’re doing here.”

Expanding the reach of HGSE is one of Long’s main goals. The dean said she wants to further the reach of community partnerships, engagements with businesses, and programs

athletics From Page 1

Athletics Will Offer 23 New Initiatives for Athletes “values-based leadership” program led by the National Consortium for Academics and Sports — make up three of the almost two dozen Crimson360 programs.

Other initiatives are meant to help athletes develop professional skills, refine their leadership abilities, and balance their workloads as student athletes.

Assistant Director of Athletics Andrea M. LaPointe, a founder of the Crimson360 program, wrotein an email that the department created Crimson360 to make student athletes more aware of resources available to them at Harvard.

“The majority of the programming is not brand new to Crimson360. We saw Crimson360 as a great way for student athletes to recognize

what’s available to them,” LaPointe wrote. “Crimson360 will forever be evolving as we strive to add value to their student-athlete experience.”

Athletics Director Robert L. Scalise said in an interview this month that the new program is a “refinement” of past programs and embodies the department’s new focus on “principled leadership,” a term he added to the department’s motto this year.

He said all of the programs in Crimson360 are designed to equip student athletes to better recognize and respond to difficult situations.

“I just want everyone in our department to know that we’re about principled leadership, academic integration and competitive excellence,” Scalise said.

“We are going to do everything

we can to try to prevent these things from happening, but in the event that something happens, how do we react?”

Some of the programs, such as the back-to-school barbecue and workshops for team captains, bring student athletes from different teams together to mingle and share ideas.

Other trainings such as the sexual assault prevention program and the alcohol communication and education skills workshops are held on a teamby-team basis throughout the year.

Men’s tennis captain Andy T. Zhou ’19 said organized crossteam events help to forge a unified athletics community, which he said he didn’t think existed his first year in Cambridge.

“People were, across differ-

ent teams, a little bit more disjointed,” Zhou said.

“I think having the big intra-team events definitely helps to bring people and different teams close together..“ Zhou added.

The sexual assault prevention and alcohol education trainings are the only Crimson360 programs that are required for all student-athletes.

These mandatory workshops come in addition to other College-mandated trainings all undergraduates must complete.

LaPointe wrote that, though the department does not track participation rates for the optional programs, so far administrators have seen “great turnouts.”

Men’s fencing captain Eli Dershwitz ’18–’20 said, though

he’s a third-year student athlete and second-year captain, he still finds the workshops useful.

“I’ve definitely felt that these captain leadership programs in general are very helpful not only because they give athletes of different teams the ability to you know, talk with the administration or talk with leaders on campus, but also it gives captains of different respective teams the ability to talk with each other about similar problems they face,” Dershwitz said.

When asked whether she would add any programs to the Crimson360 roster, women’s basketball captain Madeline M. Raster ’19 said she would launch a workshop to help seniors transition to post-graduate life. madeleine.nakada@thecrimson.com

trial From Page 1

Asian-American Applicants Saw Lowest Admit Rate of 8.1 percent. By comparison, white applicants saw an average acceptance rate of 11.1 percent in that time period, African-American applicants saw an average acceptance rate of 13.2 percent, and Hispanic-American applicants saw an average acceptance rate of 10.6 percent.

The data surfaced during court testimony when Harvard’s lead trial lawyer William F. Lee ’72 stepped up to continue his marathon questioning of the College’s long-serving Dean of Admissions, William R. Fitzsimmons ’67. Thursday marked the fourth day of the trial; Fitzsimmons has testified each day for several hours since proceedings kicked off Monday.

The trial, expected to last for at least three weeks, is the latest development in a four-yearold lawsuit that alleges Harvard illegally discriminates against Asian-American applicants.

Anti-affirmative action advocacy group Students for Fair Ad-

missions filed suit against the University in 2014.

Experts have said that — should the case wind up before the Supreme Court — it could decide the fate of race-conscious admissions in the United States. The dataset Lee presented Thursday, which appears to be sourced from internal Harvard records, breaks down College applicants into eight categories: white, Asian-American, African-American, Hispanic-American, Native-American/Native-Hawaiian, international citizen, “Other,”and “Unknown.”

Charts displayed on three pages of the 16-page dataset detail the number of applicants and the number of admits belonging to each racial group for 18 Harvard admission cycles starting in 1995. The Crimson calculated yearly admit rates for each demographic group.Harvard is typically tight-lipped about anything related to its famously secretive admissions

process, though the College’s admissions office does publish the racial demographics of its admitted classes each year.

But it has never before released as detailed a breakdown as the one Lee unveiled Thursday. The average acceptance rate overall during the data set’s time period covered clocked in at 9.3 percent. Asian-Americans were the only racial group whose acceptance rate dips below that average. The numbers also show how the pool of prospective applicants has changed since the mid-1990s.

From 1994 to 2014, Harvard saw a 257 percent increase in applications from African-American students and a 208 percent increase in applications from Hispanic-American students.

The number of Asian-American applicants increased by 94 percent and the number of white applicants increased by 63 percent. The acceptance rates for every single racial group decreased during that time peri-

od — consistent with the fact that the Harvard admissions process has grown increasingly competitive in recent years.

In 2018, the College saw an acceptance rate below 5 percent for the first time in school history.

But the acceptance rates for all racial groups did not fall at the same rate. African-American applicants saw the steepest decline — their acceptance rates fell by 12.4 percentage points over 18 years.

In the 1995-1996 admissions cycle, 19.2 percent of African-American Harvard hopefuls earned a spot at the College; in the 2012-2013 cycle, just 6.8 percent of African-American applicants did so. Hispanic-Americans saw the second-steepest decline of 8.9 percentage points, while white students saw a decline of 5.4 percentage points. Asian-American applicants saw the smallest decrease: their acceptance rate fell by just 3.6 percentage points

in that time period.

The overall decline in acceptance rates for all students measured 5.6 percentage points.

The relatively large decrease in acceptance rates for African-American and Hispanic-American applicants likely reflects the fact that Harvard has increased its outreach efforts to communities of color over the past few years.

Admissions officers regularly conduct “extensive outreach to minority applicants” as part of the Undergraduate Minority Recruitment Program, according to Harvard-submitted court documents. Overall, the data shows, admit rates for applicants of all races have grown increasingly similar over the past two decades or so.

And all racial group-specific acceptance rates have inched closer to Harvard’s overall acceptance rate. shera.avi-yonah@thecrimson.com molly.mccafferty@thecrimson.com

for the public offered by HGSE. Long’s recent trip to Detroit with Bacow is an example of one of these initiatives. Long said this trip represents the beginning of many conversations between Harvard and various school districts, community organizations, and local foundations about their needs and how Harvard can help. According to Long, the needs of these institutions and areas could lead to mutually beneficial partnerships.

Long said one challenge for Harvard in getting “out in the world,” as she puts it, is that the University does not have a consolidated network of interconnected partners and alumni. By bringing these people together, Long said she thinks that Harvard can do better in giving back to communities.

“When it was announced that President Bacow was going to go to Michigan, we started to realize how many alumni are in Michigan and how we touched so many different parts of the communities there,” Long said.

“We have to think much more about that, and use those networks and partnerships to be bigger than just what we are here in Cambridge or Allston or Longwood area, but where we are all over the world.”

On top of these challenges, Long said the field of education must also continue to address structural inequalities.

She said while there are exciting new developments in the field of education science, such as cutting-edge technology and an advanced biological and psychological understanding of a young person’s brain, not every student is able to benefit from such innovations.

“So many students, so many kids, so many families, communities, and adults aren’t getting what we know right now to be a good quality, a high quality education,” Long said.

The challenge, according to Long, is overcoming social inequities.

“While we have the best and brightest and most innovative kinds of ideas circling, we are having trouble providing that to all students, of all ages, and all communities,” Long said.

“So lots of work to be done,” she added. lainey.newman@thecrimson.com

Meals From Page 3

Meal Program Limited in Money $30 per person to cover meals with a faculty member at one of six designated Harvard Square restaurants: Grafton Street, Park Restaurant, Russell House Tavern, the Hourly Oyster House, and Temple Bar. Any group of three to five students is eligible to receive funding for a Classroom to Table lunch or dinner.

Tamara Shamir ’21, who participated in the program last fall, said she looks forward to submitting a Classroom to Table request in the next few weeks.

“I think Classroom to Table does kind of break down the formality barrier that you face in

Classroom to Table is a fantastic program.

Joseph K. Blitzstein Statistics 110: “Introduction to Probability Professor

class, and so conversations naturally flow more easily,” Shamir said.

Joseph K. Blitzstein, a Harvard professor known around campus for teaching the popular Statistics 110: “Introduction to Probability,” said he hopes the program will raise sufficient funds to remain open for longer this year.

“Classroom to Table is a fantastic program, which provides opportunities for students and faculty to have engaging conversations outside of the usual classroom and office hour settings, in some outstanding Harvard Square restaurants,” Blitzstein said.

THE HARVARD CRIMSON |

october 19, 2018

Proud to cover Harvard for 145 years and counting.

Keep the old sheet flying.

The Crimson thecrimson.com

Page 4

Page 5

THE HARVARD CRIMSON | october 19, 2018

Former President of HKS Receives $7.5 Million Colombia Visits Harvard Donation for Fellowships

By Aspen H. Buck and Rebecca E. Xi contributing Writers

Former President of Colombia Juan Manuel Santos spoke at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Institute of Politics on Thursday, reflecting on his experiences pursuing peace in Colombia and offering advice for attendees in light of the current international political climate.

In the week leading up to the event, Santos has been “very active,” speaking with University President Lawrence S. Bacow and meeting with professors and students to talk about the successful Colombia peace negotiations, according to moderator Nicholas Burns, a Kennedy School professor and former United States ambassador to NATO. In his speech Thursday evening, Santos declared the importance of fighting poverty and climate change. He also detailed lessons he learned throughout his varied career as a journalist, economist, Minister of Defense, and ultimately as president of Colombia from 2010 to 2018.

Santos, who was the sole recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize in 2016, offered the audience a glimpse into his battle for peace in Colombia. He highlighted the key role that other countries played in the peace process, adding that “support from the international community was crucial.” ­

“This is the first process where the victims of the war are put in the center of the solution of the negotiations,” Santos said. “Their rights to the truth, their rights to reparation, their rights to justice, their right to non-repetition — that became the pillars of the negotiation. No other agreement ever had done this before, so we had a test case and a precedent and what we’ve been doing the past few days [at Harvard] was to give it an academic context.”

Santos has a long history with Harvard. He attended the Kennedy School — where he spoke Thursday night — and graduated with a masters in public administration in 1981.

He was also a Nieman Fellow in 1988. He said Thursday that he sought advice from Harvard during his term as president on the “academic” and “theoretical framework” within which he could anchor his peace efforts in Colombia. He currently serves as the Angelopoulos Global Public Leaders Fellow at the Kennedy School.

Among other subjects, Santos canvassed the crisis in Venezuela and his one-time aspiration to become a journalist. He also related a few personal anecdotes involving U.S. presidents that set almost the entire audience laughing.

Near the end of the talk, Santos offered a few words meant to inspire.“This is something that I advise all of you to do: try to find a goal, try to find an objec-

tive, and fight for it and don’t get discouraged when you fail,” he said. “Stand up, and that makes life much more interesting, much more exciting, and much more fulfilling.”

After he finished, attendees quizzed the former head of state questions about his experience.

Ricardo I. Sutherland, a student at the MIT Sloan School of Management and a first-generation Colombian-American, said he was worried that predominately Afro-Latino and indigenous areas in Colombia are not receiving enough help.

In an interview after the event, Sutherland said he was “ecstatic” Santos was here at Harvard because, “How often do you get to speak to a president and tell him where your family’s from?”

Valentin S. Arias, a student at the Kennedy School and president of the Harvard Colombian Student Society, said he looks forward to inviting more Latin-American leaders to Harvard who can add a perspective “for young leaders” that stretches beyond European and American experiences.

After the conversation, Burns said he hoped Harvard students will take away another message from the event: pursue public service.

“I really hope that all our students here at Harvard, College and grad, will think about public service… so we want to put men and women who are examples in front of our students,” he said.

By Alexandra A. Chaidez Crimson Staff Writer

The Harvard Kennedy School received $7.5 million for a student fellowship program for U.S. veterans and active duty military members Thursday, according to a press release from the school.

The donation, which came from the Debra and Leon Black Family Foundation, will cover attendance costs for up to 25 graduate students annually — starting with those matriculating in fall 2019 — across the Kennedy School, Harvard Business School, and Harvard Law School. Leon D. Black, who graduated from the Business School in 1975, is the founder of Apollo Global Management, a prominent New York-based private equity firm.

According to a Kennedy School press release, the gift is the largest donation made to Harvard in recent years specifically to fund the education of students who are current or former members of the U.S. military.

“The men and women who serve in the U.S. military play a critical role in maintaining global security and stability,” Kennedy School Dean Douglas W. Elmendorf said in the press release. “This fellowship program will further the training and development of our military and veteran students, increasing their capabilities as leaders.” ­

The Center for Public Leadership at the Kennedy School will administer the fellowship program. The center recently appointed Wendy R. Sherman, a former U.S. under secretary of state for political affairs, to succeed David R. Gergen as the center’s director. “Through the generosity of the Debra and Leon Black Family Foundation, a growing number of active duty and veteran students will be able to attend Harvard, affording them the opportunity to deepen their knowledge of to-

This fellowship program will further the training and development of our military and veteran students, increasing their capabilties as leaders.

Douglas W. Elmendorf Kennedy School Dean

day’s policy and national security challenges,” Gergen, who is also a Kennedy School professor, said in the statement.

According to the press release, around 250 veterans and active duty military members attend classes at Harvard each year. At the Kennedy School, which is known for its ties to national security and foreign

policy circles, approximately 65 military students enroll in degree programs each year.

Elmendorf emphasized that, following graduation, many of these students take what they learn in Cambridge to work at the highest levels of government. “Following their Harvard experience, these students often take the knowledge gained back into public service, making significant, positive contributions in a variety of roles,” Elmendorf said in the statement.

“Several of our military and veteran alumni now serve in Congress as well as in other senior positions across the U.S. government and military.”

The Kennedy School is not the only one of Harvard’s professional schools with a significant military population. There are currently 84 military students enrolled at the Business School and more than 40 military students are enrolled at the Law School this year. In the release, Black said the goal of the fellowship is to “promote ethical, values-based leadership and character.”

“Through the fellowship program, we can provide these talented emerging leaders with tools, focused preparation, and a vibrant network of peers and colleagues, establishing a strong and lasting foundation for future world-class public leadership,” Black said. alexandra.chaidez@thecrimson.com

tickets From Page 1

Spike in Harvard-Yale Scalping Earns Rebuke From Deans Fenway Park policy stipulates that all students must sit in as-

The purpose of offering each student one ticket is to provide an opportunity for you to build your community and enjoy school spirit together.

Linda D. M. Chavers Winthrop Resident Dean

signed seats during The Game.

If students wanted to sit with a particular group of friends, to had to pick up game tickets to-

gether as a group.

So far, undergraduates do not appear particularly pleased with new rules. Students previously complained to administrators that Fenway’s rules are inconvenient and deleterious to the overall experience.

“If they’re forcing us to do all of this assigned seating, then they should know that the outcome is that people are going to want to sell their tickets,” Guadalupe M. Jacobson-Peregrino ’21 said.

“People are going to want to sell and buy tickets so that they can all sit together. It’s just an outcome that was destined to happen once the Fenway Park assigned seating happened,” she added.

After noticing online chatter about ticket sales, a number of resident deans sent nearly identical emails to students reminding them that ticket resale violates University policy.

Winthrop Resident Dean Linda D. M. Chavers wrote in an email to her House that “students who attempt to sell tickets may even be referred to the Office of Academic Integrity and Student Conduct.”

The Office of Academic Integrity and Student Conduct did not respond to requests for comment.

In her email, Chavers underscored The Game’s role in fostering a sense of community among Harvard students.

“Instead of being an anony-

mous resource that you are free to dispose of as you wish, the purpose of offering each student one ticket is to provide an opportunity for you to build your community and enjoy school spirit together,” she wrote.

Some students said the ticketing rules specific to Fenway Park have already eroded a sense of community. They suggested ticket resale might help restore it.

“Let’s say if someone from Harvard isn’t going to the game, and there’s a friend of yours whose friend is coming to Harvard and wants to get a feel of Harvard, then that’s a perfect opportunity, just give him your ticket,” Mustafa Bal ’19 said.

“Give it or sell it; work it out

with him. I don’t think that’s a big deal. That shouldn’t be a big deal.”

Chavers and other resident deans also reminded students that the free tickets are a “gift,” though some students said they

Give it or sell it; work it out with him. I don’t think that’s a big deal.

That shouldn’t be a big deal.

Mustafa Bal ’19 Student

disagreed with that idea.

“There’s a feeling

that

they’re not gifted to us. They’re part of our tuition probably, somewhere in there,” Ilan M. Goldberg ’20 said. “Not in a spoiled way.”

By contrast, Yale undergraduates must pay $25 per ticket.

Jacobsen-Peregrino said the new ticket policy and the sale of those tickets over email lists marks a departure from a storied Harvard tradition.

“You take one part of the tradition and it feels like everything starts to crumble,” she said. “I think it’s disheartening to the administration because they see all of these kids who would rather make money off of tickets then go to a game where they can’t sit with their friends.”

The sights and sounds of Harvard.

The Crimson @crimson_photo

ne.

THE HARVARD CRIMSON | OCTOBER 19, 2018

PAGE 6

EDITORIAL THE CRIMSON EDITORIAL BOARD

OP-ED

Bacow Makes the Right Move in Planning for the Next Recession

Defending Trans Lives Is a Massachusetts Value

T

hough University President Lawrence S. Bacow was only officially installed as president of Harvard University weeks ago, he has already created long-term plans to ensure the success of the University. More specifically, Bacow, an economist by training, has challenged all Harvard schools to engage in “scenario planning” for the next recession. Though the U.S. economy is currently booming, Bacow has repeatedly warned that a recession is inevitable and that it is crucial to prepare for it. We commend Bacow for his foresight and wholeheartedly agree with his decision to plan ahead for a potential economic downturn in the future.

The focus on preparing for an economic downturn is especially necessary given Harvard’s history and the current political climate. During the Great Recession in 2008, Harvard quickly found itself in a precarious position, most notably indicated by an $11 billion single-year loss in the endowment. The recession also delayed the construction of the new Allston campus, froze faculty hiring in the Faculty of the Arts and Sciences, caused layoffs for hundreds of University employees, and delayed the kickoff of the capital campaign. These losses led to long-term setbacks that Harvard still has not recovered from. Harvard’s endow-

ment growth is still lower than almost all of the rest of our peer institutions in the Ivy League. With the recent imposition of the federal endowment tax, Harvard’s precarious economic situation is even more clear. As such, a downturn as dramatic as what the University underwent in the last recession would simply be unacceptable.

When planning for the next recession, we encourage the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, as well as other divisions of the University, not only to be pragmatic in their plans, but also to prioritize that which makes Harvard excellent. Recessions often result in faculty hiring freezes, and though certain cuts may be unavoidable, Harvard’s schools should be as frugal as possible in order to ensure this doesn’t happen. Ideally, a recession should not limit the academic experiences of students.

Most importantly, a recession should not limit who has access to Harvard.

Specifically, we strongly urge the University to maintain financial aid as a top priority regardless of what economic pressures may arise. Recessions and economic downturns often affect students’ ability to pay, and this may be especially true for low-income students. In this time, it is crucial for Harvard to maintain a strong financial aid program that

can continue to support a diverse class.

It is also crucial for the University to strengthen these programs now, so that there is no danger of them being cut in the future. Students are the lifeblood of Harvard, a place whose mission it is to educate the best and the brightest. In order to do so, Harvard must remain a university that all students have equal access to, and must remain an institution that can attract all students, irrespective of their backgrounds.

Regardless of when the next recession is and how much of an economic downturn is coming, we are pleased to see University leaders are planning pragmatically for the future. We hope that in their plans, they continue to prioritize the academic experiences of all students.

Harvard should always remain an institution where all students know that they can attend and receive the highest quality of education.

This staff editorial solely represents the majority view of The Crimson Editorial Board. It is the product of discussions at regular Editorial Board meetings. In order to ensure the impartiality of our journalism, Crimson editors who choose to opine and vote at these meetings are not involved in the reporting of articles on similar topics.

By SAM S. AMES

T

his November, Massachusetts will be the latest state to face the question of civil rights at the ballot box. Nondiscrimination protections that have, since 2016, protected transgender people from discrimination in public places are at risk of being repealed by voters. This vote, and the debates leading up to it, have a very real impact on the lives, and deaths, of transgender people like me.

In addition to being a student at Harvard Divinity School and an occasional civil rights lawyer, I also serve as the executive director of Trans Lifeline, a national suicide prevention organization that includes a crisis and peer support hotline run for trans people, by trans people. I’ve been fortunate enough to live in Massachusetts on and off for the last few years and to call Harvard a second home. From Boston to Greenfield, I’ve seen firsthand how trans people are contributing to the communities, schools, and houses of worship they call home, and I understand them when they tell me they can’t imagine living anywhere else. I’ve also seen the very real lives at risk when we talk about civil rights from a place of fear rather than respect.

One of the extraordinary things about our crisis hotline is that, in addition to providing lifesaving services to trans people, it gives us a real-time barometer of the impact current events are having on the mental health of our people. In the last

Voting yes on 3 preserves the freedom of all Massachusetts residents, including transgender ones, to live their lives free from discrimination.

ds.

AMY Y. LI—CRIMSON PHOTOGRAPHER

COLUMN

Beyond the Bitter Railing

Salma Abdelrahman SEARCHING FOR MENTORS IN MEMORIES

O

n sunny days in Harvard Yard, when the light of autumn leaves pop orange, maroon, vibrant yellow, and a fading green, and the tower on Memorial Church reflects bright white back to me, I picture myself in an admissions brochure. Touting an aggressively crimson sweater, I walk slightly stiffly.

Around me are piles of dead leaves fallen from shedding male oaks. Posing, I pick up a batch and launch it into the air above me. As the rotting leaves fall around me, I laugh with my chest and smile a little too wide and tilt my head slightly, angling myself for some camera or the people who watch me — a brown face in a sea of white ones.

If all the world’s a stage, Harvard is one too. On my first day here, among other things, I found in my freshman welcome packet some metaphorical script, statements on a “commitment to diversity and inclusion” in pamphlets with people of various shades. Highlighted were the lines I was expected to read out to the world: “Students of color contribute so much to this community …”, “Bridging divides across experiences is vital...”, “There is so much to learn from diversity….” Overwhelmed and confused by its contents and the bustling energy of freshman move-in, I skimmed my lines quickly and threw the script haphazardly onto my dorm room desk, where it would soon get lost amongst syllabi, textbooks, flyers, and the other things I imagined would open new worlds for me.

Within two hours, in conversation with a white entryway-mate who was curious about my thoughts on DuBois’s “Souls of Black Folk,” I heard, in my voice, lines from that fated script. I had

barely cracked open our assigned summer reading, let alone developed a cohesive thought on theories of racial uplift, and yet here I was, “speaking as a woman of color….”

The trend continued. I checked privilege, I pushed back, I diversified rooms, and soon into the school year, my vocabulary started and ended on the pages of that script. I fell quickly into the role of Indignant Student Activist, one which I had been assigned by nature of my various identities and the color of my skin, and my existence became, in James Baldwin’s words, one of “bitter railing.”

On cloudy days, the illusion fades. The

I want to imagine a world beyond this one, where the truths in my body dance effortlessly and I laugh lightly and I speak with integrity to my complexities and, with ease, love the whole of myself — a world in which I am liberated.

Yard looks more dull now and mud coats the leaves as they fall to the ground. The looming threat of a challenge to Harvard’s admissions practices has sent the people who set this stage into a whirling panic. I watch silently as administrators scramble to protect the sanctity of “diversity,” and the emails that appear in my inbox from the highest offices of this institution sound almost like a competition of who can scream “WE NEED PEOPLE OF COLOR” the loudest. Surveying the chaos that has unfolded, I chuckle and can’t help but wonder what all of this is for. Why are these directors so determined to cast us? What are the meanings of the roles that they want us to fill? And why have we clung to them?

I spent two years at Harvard reading the lines they’d written for me. For two years, my existence in this institution served as a “necessary” and “healthy”

challenge. During various meetings with students and College staff, I was asked to push this institution forward, but only as far as their script would allow. White folks asked me constantly to help them empathize with the struggles of students of color: “Show me why I should care!

Teach me how to be human!”

I, the Indignant Student Activist, was, as Baldwin writes, as “a mirror of our confusion, dishonesty, panic,” giving white people a space to reflect on the horrid realities of the consequences of their actions and inactions. Interacting with me was a transformative experience transactionalized, and I, in this space, internalized the dehumanization others placed on me, denying my own complexity, my own humanity.

I tried for some time to find my fulfillment in the acts of resisting, but as Baldwin taught me in “Everybody’s Protest Novel,” true liberation cannot come from the formation of an identity in opposition to the systems and structures that limit me. “We take our shape, it is true, within and against that cage of reality bequeathed us at our birth; and yet it is precisely through our dependence on this reality that we are most endlessly betrayed.” In adhering to my script, I lived in half-truths in order to make my striving for half-victories more efficient; but beneath the words that are given to me lies my frightening truth, which I have subjected to silence because it cannot not fit into their narrative of protest.

These gates have trapped me in their construction. In these confines, I’ve muffled the difficult questions that bring me closer to my complicated human nature: What of my fragile blackness? And my shameful lack of rhythm? And my capacity, or lack thereof, to love? And my experience of faith? And loneliness? And joy?

If our defense of diversity ultimately legitimizes the sentimentalities around race of this stage that we inhabit, I’ll have no part in it. c For “our humanity is our burden, our life; we need not battle for it; we need only do what is infinitely more difficult — that is, accept it.”

—Salma Abdelrahman ’20 is a Sociology concentrator in Eliot House. Her column appears on alternate Fridays.

four months, calls to Trans Lifeline from Massachusetts phone numbers have increased by two to four times, even accounting for nationwide trends. Putting the civil rights of a vulnerable population to a vote has consequences.

Campaign ads that stoke fear about trans people in bathrooms pose a far greater threat to our lives than trans people pose to anyone with whom we share a public accommodation. Trans people — especially trans youth, who are at particularly high risk for mental health impacts — are listening to these messages. Studies indicate that around 40 percent of trans people have attempted suicide, compared with less than 5 percent of the general public. A recent study published by the American Academy of Pediatrics found that over half of transmasculine youth (trans youth assigned female at birth but who identify as more masculine than feminine) report at least one attempt. The relentless hostility, discrimination, and bullying those kids face may not show up on their faces, but they show up on our hotline.

What’s more, these arguments are demonstrably false. The leading safety experts in the state — including the Massachusetts Coalition Against Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence, the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association, and others — are all urging voters to vote yes on Question 3.

Here at Harvard Divinity School, which has both a trans-inclusive nondiscrimination policy and

Campaign ads that stoke fear about trans people in bathrooms pose a far greater threat to our lives than trans people pose to anyone with whom we share a public accommodation.

gender-neutral bathrooms, we’ve been training future faith leaders of many genders side by side for years without incident. While there has been no increase in harassment in bathrooms since the state nondiscrimination law was passed, the absence of public accommodation protections puts trans people at acute risk for harassment there.

Repealing this law would not make a single person safer, but it would make some of the most vulnerable lives in Massachusetts even more vulnerable. At Trans Lifeline, we don’t just see the hard stuff. We also see how resilient the trans community is, how important nondiscrimination protections are to keeping us safe, how lifesaving it is to feel supported by friends and family, and how far even small acts of love, kindness, and respect can go. We see the extraordinary emotional and spiritual resilience of people who refuse to give up their own humanity. We see how much hate trans people face, but we also see what is possible when we are able to live authentic lives with the same safety, privacy, and dignity as everyone else.

I urge all members of the Harvard community to register today and vote yes on 3 this November. Voting yes on 3 preserves the freedom of all Massachusetts residents, including transgender ones, to live their lives free from discrimination.

It ensures that dignity and respect continue to be Massachusetts values. And, maybe most importantly, it sends a message to the people calling our hotline that they are welcome in the state they call home.

—Sam S. Ames is a master’s student at Harvard Divinity School and the executive director of Trans Lifeline.

ARTS

THE HARVARD CRIMSON | OCTOBER 19, 2018 | PAGE 7

CAMPUS

Raise a Glass to ‘Raise a Glass’ Exhibition ALEXANDRA C. KIM CONTRIBUT WRITER On Oct.13, the Harvard Ceramics Studio in Allston hosted an opening reception and public demonstration for their newest exhibition, “Raise a Glass: A Contemporary Response to Animal-Shaped Vessels from the Ancient World.” The exhibition is inspired by a current exhibition at the Harvard Art Museums, “Animal-Shaped Vessels from the Ancient World: Feasting with Gods, Heroes, and Kings,” which offers a collection of various vessels shaped as animals — both real and imagined — that were once used as drinking horns and pitchers. The Harvard Ceramic Program takes a contemporary spin on the collection of ancient vessels.

Kathy King, Director of Education at the Ceramics Program, curated this exhibit, amassing a grouping of work from 15 different artists for “Raise a Glass.” She said she asked these artists to create their own interpretation of vessels inspired by the ancient ones currently on view at The Harvard Art Museums.

“I wanted to find artists that I knew either had worked with animal imagery in some way, or for whom it would be really interesting to give this kind of assignment,” King said.

The artists displayed at the Ceramics Studio are chosen from contemporary sculptors and vessel makers from around the world. Except for one piece made of silver, all of the works are made of clay or at least have some clay component. Other than this commonality in material, each artist found their own unique interpretation of the ancient vessels and produced pieces that are vastly different from one another. One artist, Salvador JimenezFlores, constructed a contemporary piece with various media boldly mounted on the wall. A ceramic drinking vessel sits in the middle of a piece of animal hide hanging from the wall. The words “WE ARE NOT ANIMALS” are etched through the hide in block lettering, and bright gold tassels hang below.

By contrast, artist Mia Riley created a work titled “Wolf Spirit Rhyton” that is reminiscent of traditional East Asian art. A wolf’s head opens up into a drinking vessel. The piece is coated in a celadon-like glaze and decorated with delicate carvings. Not only is this piece a nod to her Asian heritage, the animals she chose are very relevant to her upbringing in Canada.

“The wolf and the bison are two animals that have a lot of cultural presence where I’m from,” she said. Because Riley said there is not a lot of indigenous pottery where she is from in Alberta, Canada, she uses the concept of the animal head to realize what “a more spiritual piece of pottery might look like... because we don’t necessarily have that legacy of traditional terracotta.”

Around five or six of the contributing artists attended the opening reception and three artists even said a few words about their pieces and process during the opening reception gallery talk. In addition to hearing about process, the reception offered attendees the opportunity to physically interact with the process by producing their own animal shaped vessel. Tables were set up with small molds and terracotta clay. Guided by a few ceramicists, the public could experiment with making their very own piece.

The “Raise a Glass” exhibition is not only inspired by the exhibition at the Harvard Art Museums. It also exists in conversation with the “Animal-shaped Vessels” exhibit. The curator of the Animal Shaped Vessels exhibit Susanne Ebbinghaus spoke about how the exhibition centers around different cultures interpretation of vessels.

“It’s fabulous to see yet another re-interpretation to that idea,” Ebbinghaus said. “Seeing the creative responses to the ancient vessels makes me see the ancient vessels with different eyes.”

ds.

King also spoke about the two exhibitions in relation to one another. Over the one and a half years spent working on the exhibition, she had not seen the ancient vessels now on view at the Museum in person. After working on this upcoming exhibition and staring at images of the vessels for such a long time, King said she started crying when she first went into the show.

When King recruited these artists, she said she put very few limits on what they could or could not produce. As a result, the exhibition displays a diverse range of styles and mediums. Linked through a shared inspiration, the “Raise a Glass” exhibition shares different stories, backgrounds, and interpretations. The opening reception is a particular highlight of this exhibit, given the interactive component. As King said: “It’s a great mix to get people to get beyond the austere museum setting and really experience the work.”

MIA RILEY, ARTIST CREDIT; DARRAH BOWDEN FOR THE CERAMICS PROGRAM, OFFICE FOR THE ARTS AT HARVARD

BOOKS

‘Burning Down the Haus’ a Human Depiction of Social Change JACK M. SCHROEDER CONTRIBUTING WRITER

“Create your own world, your own reality. DIY. Revolution.” With these words, Tim Mohr ends the preface of “Burning Down the Haus,” his chronicle of the 1980s East German punk movement. This message reverberates throughout the entire story as the true guiding line between the non-fictional characters Mohr details. The East German punk movement owes its success, he argues, to having found enough disaffected youths with a similar outlet for their anger toward the oppressive Erich Honecker regime. “Don’t die in the waiting room of the future,” these punks proclaim. When Mohr focuses on these people, each of whom individually contributes to the success of the movement as a whole, “Haus” excels.

The author’s ability to connect with these punks is not coincidental, however. Mohr, originally a translator, met past members of the movement during his time as a club DJ in Berlin. “In short, this book would never have been conceived without Kobs, and would never have been completed without Pankow,” he claims, referring to past members. This privileged access is what makes “Burning Down the Haus” so fulfilling to read. Mohr could have written a spectator’s account of East German punks, one that largely sits back and paints the scene with broad brush strokes, but his choice to dive deep into the lives of real people, each interesting in their own way, propels the book forward throughout the years of struggle these punks faced.

“Burning Down the Haus,” though, does not glamorize their struggle. The punks have many enemies: the Stasi (East Germany’s secret police), neo-Nazi skinheads, a disinterested populace, even fellow punks acting as Stasi informants. Mohr deftly creates an environment of fear and paranoia by interspersing the book with punk lyrics of the era: “Minefields and barbed wire so nobody risks going over / Walls and electric fences, they’re snatching away our freedom / Automatic firing devices and minefields so we like it here / In our beautiful country, in our beautiful country.” In the face of persecution, some punks gave up the movement entirely. “It had always been so fun — the little gang of punks against the idiot overlords. All the difficulties had just brought them closer together,” Mohr describes.

“But now [Chaos] felt overwhelmed. Beaten Down. The Stasi’s strategy of degradation had worked.”

ALYSSA D. TRUONG / CRIMSON DESIGNER

ne.

Mohr’s account of the period is not all foreboding. The atmosphere of East Germany allows him to include some humor that, while dark, helps lighten the mood. And, in contrast with the Stasi, Mohr’s depiction of outsiders who support the punks is all the more touching.

The decentralized church structure allows for individual pastors and deacons, such as Uwe Kulish, to create safe havens for the punks to freely associate. “The deacons who worked directly with the punks took their real-life concerns seriously, and helped them deal with trouble at work and in school and even with the police,” Mohr writes. There is even a lowlevel Stasi agent who gives a punk friendly advice on how to avoid jail time. These portrayals help humanize the constituents of “Burning Down the Haus” and expand its scope to East German society as a whole.

In one sense, “Burning Down the Haus” is Mohr’s attempt to demonstrate the power of art in an oppressive regime. Any notion of subtly nodding to present-day America is destroyed in his preface. “My initial belief in the importance of this story was reinforced after I returned to the U.S. and recognized an ominous echo in developments in my own country,” Mohr writes. Indeed, Mohr’s parallels between 1980s East Germany and modern-day America — mass surveillance, a legal gray-area that facilitates arrests, and the seeming failure of class or race-based protests — are correct and warranted. However, Mohr’s work should not be read as an instructional course, or even as a success story. While the Berlin Wall indeed falls, the punk movement also subsides. East German society as a whole certainly benefited from unification, but punkers themselves do not find widespread acceptance, which eventually necessitates a loose transition into the techno movement. This in itself is a stark warning to would-be revolutionaries: Even if they succeed in reshaping society, there is no guarantee their movement will survive to witness the aftermath.

That said, there is something heroic about this martyr-like approach to social change.

And, at its core, lauding a bottom-up approach is what Mohr does best. As a result, even though Mohr arguably underplays the negative ramifications of the East German punk movement, “Burning Down the Haus” stands as a testament to the DIY ethos as a response to oppression, which, in this day and age, may be exactly what American society needs.

Sports

Weekend event

schedule

Friday ______________________________________

saturday ______________________________________

Women’s Ice Hockey vs. Dartmouth 6:00pm, Bright-Landry Hockey Center

Football vs. Princeton 12:00 pm, Harvard Stadium

Women’s Volleyball vs. Dartmouth 7:00pm, Malkin Athletic Center

Men’s Ice Hockey vs. USNTDP U-18 7:00pm, Bright-Landry Hockey Center

Football

Harvard Seeks Upset Victory Over No. 18/23 Princeton

By CADE PALMER Crimson Staff Writer

Princeton is averaging 52 points per game. Its opponents are averaging 8.6. The latter number has produced a season in which the Tigers have yet to allow an opposing team notch more than 10 points — a feat that was last achieved in 1935 when the captain of that team was nominated for the Heisman trophy.

The last time a Princeton team scored 260 points in its first five contests was in 1888.

On Saturday, Harvard (3-2, 1-1 Ivy) will meet this historically hot No. 18/23 Princeton (50, 2-0) team for the 111th rendition of the matchup on the turf of Harvard Stadium at noon. “[This is] probably the best Princeton team, conservatively, in the last 40 years,” Harvard coach Tim Murphy said. “We’re always excited to play. We’re always particularly excited to play big games like Princeton, but this will be a tremendous challenge because they appear to have no weaknesses.”

This is the second consecutive season that Harvard will host Princeton at its coliseum.

The duplicity is a result of the Ivy League shifting its schedule this season and is the first time since a series of Harvard home games beginning in 1973 that the two teams have squared off at Harvard Stadium twice in a row.

Last season, the home field advantage didn’t do much good as Princeton obliterated Harvard in its own house, 52-17 — the worst home loss for Harvard in over 50 years.

Speaking of second times, Harvard has already squared off against one ranked team this season: No. 20/22 Rhode Island.

The 23-16 loss to the Rams was the team’s first of the season.

Princeton, however, hasn’t lost — a feat only four other FCS teams have managed to replicate. Those three other teams ­

are No. 1/1 North Dakota State, No. 13/17 Colgate and No. 24 Dartmouth.

This is the first time since 2006 that Princeton has tallied wins in each of its first five games.

That domination comes in part from the return of quarterback John Lovett. The 2016 Ivy League Player of the Year missed last season due to a shoulder injury but now sits atop multiple FCS lists. He leads the nation in rush yards per carry (8.98) and in points responsible per game (27.5), and he is second in passing efficiency (187.5).

Lovett likewise is top three in the Ancient Eight for rushing yards and passing yards per game with 101 and 233, respectively. Lovett is the only Ivy League player to rank top 10 in both.

“He’s kind of a perfect storm of that big type of wildcat quarterback … and at the same time he’s certainly skilled enough to get the ball down the field,” Murphy said. “The combination has been pretty unique.”

Against Lehigh on Oct. 6, Lovett suffered an injury. The starter was sidelined for the following Brown matchup but the team’s offensive production did not stutter.

Instead, junior Kevin Davidson made his first collegiate start, throwing for 304 yards and adding four touchdowns for the cherry on top.

Lovett is currently being evaluated as day-to-day and there’s no word yet whether the senior will lead Princeton in Saturday’s contest.

Harvard is facing injuries of its own.

Against Cornell, senior wideout Justice Shelton-Mosley was enveloped by a squad of defenders on a punt return. The standout senior will not return to play this season after suffering a lower body injury.

Supplementing Princeton’s quarterback, whoever that may

EXTRA YARDAGE Senior Adam Scott looks to break Princeton’s stifling defense, which has not allowed more than 10 points in a game this season.

Timothy R. O’meara—Crimson photographer

be, is senior wide receiver Jesper Horsted. He is Princeton’s all-time leader in touchdown catches with 23, third in the institution’s history for career receptions with 159, and fourth in career receiving yards with 2192.

Horsted’s best game, however, was last season’s trouncing of Harvard where the then-junior notched personal bests in receptions and yards.

For Harvard, it has been the field goal unit that has been the most pristine thus far. Junior kicker Jake McIntyre is only three boots away from tying the program record of 30. The junior currently ranks second

in the nation for field goals per game with two.

McIntyre tallied the final points for Harvard last week in a walk-off field goal against Holy Cross.

The team’s defense has also been consistently solid. The squad is third in the nation currently for first down defense and fourth-down down conversion defense.

Princeton, conversely, has converted a perfect four for four on fourth downs during the last two games.

Under center for Harvard will be senior Tom Stewart. Saturday’s game will represent the senior’s third start for team, af-

ter taking first snaps last week against Holy Cross. “[Tom Stewart has] been giving us an dynamic presence, offensive and in general,” Murphy said. “His ability to get the ball down the field accurately has really opened up a new dimension for our offense because we have some kids who can run.”

While it’s Stewart’s third career start, he’s been throwing with some of his receivers for almost five years. Namely senior Adam Scott.

“We’re both from Texas so we kind of have that Texas connection,” Scott said. “Prior to us coming here we would both train together. When we found

out we were both committed here … he would drive up to my high school, like 45 minutes away, we would throw and just kind of visualize ourselves on the field and now it’s unfolding right now. It’s pretty cool.”

Harvard will need the connection to convert into points Saturday as so far this season, Princeton hasn’t lost a single quarter.

“I think we keep it a close game and keep in it into the fourth,” McIntyre said. “They haven’t had to play a full game yet so I think we can tire them out.” cade.palmer@thecrimson.com

tennis

Harvard Posts Strong Results at Northeast Regionals

By Coulson Rich Contributing Writer

Both the Harvard men’s and women’s tennis teams saw action this past week at the ITA Northeast Regionals, and both squads had impressive finishes to the tournament.

Fellow Ivy League school Princeton hosted the men’s tournament, which welcomed players from schools all around the Northeast, while Yale hosted the women’s side.

Both tournaments ran from Oct. 11-16. ­

The men’s team sent six players down to the Lenz Tennis Center in Princeton, N.J., to compete, including captain Andy Zhou, junior Robert Wrzesinski, and freshman Brian Shi, who all earned seeded spots in the single’s draw.

The rookie Shi played a hard fought match against Princeton, ultimately falling to his opponent 6-3, 4-6, 6-3 in the second round.

Wrzesinski was unable to play his second round match, awarding the win to Sid Chari from Dartmouth in a walkover.

On the doubles side of the bracket, the Crimson was represented by three duos. Captain Christopher Morrow and Wrzesinski formed one pairing and, along with the team of junior Logan Weber and Shi, were seeded in the main draw of the tournament. In addition, Zhou and freshman Steven Sun competed as a twosome after achieving a 2-0 record at the 2018 Chowder Fest.

Zhou and Sun got off to a hot start, beating Wagner in the first round 8-2 and followed up with another strong victory, de-

feating Monmouth 8-3. Their luck ran out in the third round, however, falling 8-3 to Dartmouth.

Shi and Weber, who were awarded a first round bye, were also able to reach the Round of 16.

Morrow and Wrzesinski found the most success of Harvard’s double’s teams, defeating Fordham in the first round 8-2 and then Penn in a close 8-6 match. They followed that up with an easy 8-1 win over St. John’s, but came up short against Columbia 8-4 in the

MAKING IT FAR Junior Jenna Friedel earned a spot in the semifinals of the tournament, a marked mprovement over last year’s second round finish.

Henry Zhu—Crimson photographer

quarterfinal round.

The star of the weekend for the Crimson was Zhou, who was able to replicate his impressive showing last year at the ITA Regionals and reach the semifinal round for the second year in a row. After a first round bye, Zhou encountered some trouble in his first match against Brown.

“I was really struggling and there were tough conditions outside, the weather was cold and windy, and it was pretty difficult to get over that initial hump to get back into a match play situation,” Zhou said. “It was difficult because I wasn’t in the right mindset.”

The Palo Alto, Calif. native was able to pull out the victory after the initial adversity, winning 7-5, 3-6, 7-6(4). Zhou thought that the win was a boost for rest of the tournament. He was able to follow that victory up with three more easy wins before falling to eventual champion David Volfson of Cornell.

“I was glad I was able to battle through that and come out with a win,” Zhou said. “I think things got a lot easier for me after that.”

Moving north to the courts at Yale, Harvard women’s tennis had five players competing, with four in the single’s bracket and one double’s team.

Junior Natasha Gonzalez and sophomore Anna Li joined up to compete as a double’s duo, and found an easy 8-1 win against LIU in the first round before falling to Brown 8-5.

The four single’s competitors all had a strong showing for the Crimson, with each reaching the second round of competition. Gonzalez again fell in the second round, this time 6-3, 6-2 to Syracuse.

Freshman Rachel Lim, who earned a bye in the first round, had an impressive outing in her first time at the regionals. The rookie picked up a 6-1, 6-2 win in the second round, then defeated Penn 6-4, 6-3 before falling in the Round of 16 to Syracuse.

Junior Irene Lu was able to reach the third round after a first round bye and a threeset win victory over Brown, 6-2, 3-6, 6-1. In her next match against Columbia she did not fare as well and lost in straight sets 6-2, 6-2.

The last player standing for Harvard was junior Jenna Friedel, who put on a show just as impressive as Zhou did for the men’s squad. Her appearance in the semifinals was a marked improvement over last year’s tournament, where she lost in the second round.

Friedel cited the team’s supportiveness as the key to her success this last week.

“It was my first time traveling with the new assistant coach, Coach Mason [Astley], which was an awesome experience,” Friedel said. “It was really great to have my team behind me, supporting me from campus.”

After a first round bye and a routine 6-3, 6-3 win over Buffalo, her third round match did not start as smoothly. After losing the first set 0-6, she said it was her teammates once again who helped her push through.

“It was a night match and I was the last match on that day so all of my teammates came out to support me,” Friedel said. “I managed to come back in the second and third sets and ended up winning that match...so that was a really good experience having them all behind me.”