The Harvard Crimson - Volume CXLV, No. 112

The Harvard Crimson The University Daily, Est. 1873 | Volume CXLV, No. 112 | Cambridge, Massachusetts | Monday, October 29, 2018

editorial PAGE 8

news PAGE 5

sports PAGE 9

Harvard should pay its fair share to boost the economy, Gonzalez writes.

UC votes down a funding proposal for student dinners and advising outings.

Men’s ice hockey drops a close overtime contest to Dartmouth 6 to 7.

How Harvard Admissions Really Works College: what they can expect to happen next — and how the Harvard admissions process really works.

By Delano R. Franklin and Molly C. Mccafferty Crimson Staff Writers

In the coming months, tens of thousands of Harvard hopefuls around the globe will grit their teeth, cross their fingers, and hit “Submit” on applications to attend the world’s top-ranked university.

The vast majority will fail.

Harvard — the second-most selective four-year college in the United States — typically sees an acceptance rate of about 5 percent.

But this year’s crop of high school dreamers have an advan-

interview

tage their predecessors did not: an inside understanding of how the College decides who qualifies as Harvard material.

This year’s application cycle comes soon after the highstakes and high-profile Harvard admissions trial that spurred the release of previously confidential documents and data that shed unprecedented light on the inner workings of the College’s admissions process.

The trial, which kicked off Oct. 15 in the John Joseph Moakley United States Courthouse in Boston, marks the latest development in a four-year-old law-

First Read

suit alleging Harvard discriminates against Asian-American applicants. For the past two weeks, lawyers for the University and Students for Fair Admissions — the anti-affirmative action advocacy group that sued Harvard in Nov. 2014 — have traveled to court every day to debate the legality of race-conscious admissions.

The trial is slated to end Friday, but experts have predicted a cascading series of appeals will bring the case before the Supreme Court. If it does, it could mean the end of affirmative action in America as we know it.

Regardless of how the nation’s highest court rules, one thing is certain: Harvard’s super-secret admissions process is secret no longer.

Documents made public over the summer and in court across the past two weeks unravel what University lawyer William F. Lee ’72 once called “the secret of Coke.”

The early decision application deadline for the Class of 2023 is Nov. 1 and the regular decision deadline falls on Jan. 1. As students pore over their transcripts and put the finishing touches on their personal essays, here’s a run-down of

Sub-Committee

Full Committee

Step One: Recruitment Harvard’s admissions office starts thinking about prospective applicants well before many high schoolers start thinking about the College.

Things typically kick off when Harvard purchases students’ test scores and contact information from standardized testing companies such as the College Board and ACT Inc., which administer the SAT and the ACT, respectively.

Dean of Admissions and Financial Aid William R. Fitzsimmons ’67 testified in court Oct. 17 that the University buys information for “well in excess of 100,000” students each year.

“It’s a good start,” Fitzsimmons said.

The College uses this data to identify “accomplished students” and then floods their inboxes and mailboxes with emails, letters, and shiny booklets stuffed with glossy photos of Harvard’s campus.

Sometimes, the College starts recruiting promising applicants as early as freshman year of high school, according to the 2013-2014 iteration of the Harvard Admissions Office interviewer handbook.

Next, admissions officers put rubber to the road to seek out candidates across the country. Sometimes alone and sometimes traveling alongside representatives from other top-tier schools — such as the University of Pennsylvania, Princeton University, and Yale University — Harvard officials trekked to 130 cities in all 50 states in the 20132014 school year, the handbook states.

Once arrived, staffers typically rent out public spaces like hotel conference rooms and give presentations meant to explain the admissions process and advertise Harvard.

Race Can’t Be Factor

By Delano R. Franklin, Iris M. Lewis, and Cindy H. Zhang Crimson Staff Writers

­nlike in admissions cyU cles past, Harvard officials will abide by specific, written guidelines detailing how and when they may consider an applicant’s race when deciding whether to admit that student to the College’s Class of 2023 this year.

A copy of the guidelines obtained by The Crimson — in which Harvard outlines application “reading procedures” for the Class of 2023 — explicitly prohibits officers from pondering a candidate’s race when assigning scores for personal traits.

The admissions office

See Personal Page 5

sports PAGE 10

Harvard field hockey clinches Ivy League title with 6-0 win over Dartmouth.

See Admissions Page 3

HKS Still White, Male, Per Harvard Holds Vigil in Wake of Pittsburgh Shooting Report President Bacow speaks at the vigil. Jocelyn Wang—Crimson photographer

By Aidan F. Ryan Crimson Staff Writer

University affiliates gathered at Harvard Hillel Sunday evening to support each other as they honored the victims of the deadly mass shooting at a Pittsburgh synagogue Saturday morning.

Close to 100 individuals — Jewish and non-Jewish alike — packed into the vigil to pay their respects for the eleven victims of Saturday’s tragedy. Students gathered in front of the room and called out the names of the victims, lighting a candle for each one as the crowd looked on.

Rabbi Dani Passow spoke first, holding back tears as he shared a story from the book of Genesis. He described God instructing Abraham to kill his ­

Inside this issue

Harvard Today 2

son Isaac before an angel stops Abraham at the last second.

Passow connected the parable to synagogues across the world on Saturday morning.

“In every synagogue that relived this story, the angel cried out and Isaac was saved. In every synagogue but one,” Passow said. “Since then, millions and millions of Isaacs have been slaughtered. May these be the last of Isaac’s ashes that lay on the altar.”

The shooting occurred Saturday at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, Penn., claiming the lives of eleven worshipers and wounding six others. Witnesses said the shooter yelled anti-Semitic statements before he opened fire, according to the Washington Post.

Prosecutors charged the shooter with 29 counts of fed-

News 3

Editorial 8

Affiliates gather at Harvard Hillel to pay their respects to the fallen. Jocelyn Wang—Crimson photographer

By Alexandra A. Chaidez

eral civil rights crimes Saturday night. The shooting is the deadliest attack against the Jewish community on American soil.

At the vigil, University president Lawrence S. Bacow took a few moments to speak on the tragedy and how the nation can move forward.

“We can do more than simply comfort each other,” Bacow said. “We can vote for those who would bring us together as opposed to those who would divide us.”

Bacow also said the tragedy affects everyone, regardless of religion or identity.

“This was not simply a crime against Jews,” Bacow said. “It was a crime against all who stand for social justice. It was a crime against all people of

­ demographic report at the A Harvard Kennedy School last year provoked outrage when it revealed the school was mostly white and male and struggles to recruit and retain minorities. A year later, that remains the case, according to the latest data.

The data, released to Kennedy School affiliates in a fourpage report Thursday, indicates little change in the low numbers of underrepresented minorities who attend, teach, and work at the school.

“The report shows that the Kennedy School community is not as diverse along various dimensions as it should be in order to achieve full excellence in our mission,” Kennedy School Dean

See Vigil Page 5

See Diversity Page 5

Sports 9

Today’s Forecast

Crimson Staff Writer

rainy High: 57 Low: 38

Visit thecrimson.com.

Follow @TheCrimson on Twitter.

concertmaster

THE HARVARD CRIMSON |

October 29, 2018

Page 2

Harvard Today

For Lunch Pork Sausage w/ Onions & Peppers Rosemary Lemon Garlic Chicken Baked Spaghetti Casserole

For Dinner Broiled Honey-Ginger Salmon General Gao’s Chicken Vegetable Lo Mein with Tofu

Today’s Events

in The Real World

Diversity Dialogue Series: Culture or Costume?

Grays Hall Basement, 7:00 p.m.

Far-Right Populist

Halloween is a time of year to dress up as whatever you want, but certain costumes should be off-limits. Join the diversity peer educators to talk about how to keep costumes on campus respectful of all cultures.

Elected President of Brazil Called the Donald Trump of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro was elected to the presidency in Brazil today with 56 percent of the vote. He is part of the first farright administration in the 30 years since the military dictatorship ended.

Jenny Slate Stand-Up The Wilbur, 7:30 p.m.

Remembering the Victims of the Philadelphia Synagogue Shooting

Jenny Slate, a comedian known for her work in Parks and Rec, Venom, and Zootopia, will be performing at the Wilbur. Come listen to her hilarious stand-up comedy and hot takes on current events.

With the recent news of the Tree of Life Synagogue shooting, it’s important to focus on honoring those lost. Read about the victims of the shootings and how they had impacted the community around them.

Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters & How to Get It Emerson 108, 8:00 p.m.

Learn about inequalities in orgasms from this Sex Week panel in Emerson 108. Not surprisingly, most women are having trouble orgasming in the midst of campus hookup culture, and this panel wants to educate you on how to change that (Looking at you, Chad).

Protesters held a rally for transgender rights in Boston. amanda y. su—Crimson photographer

Daily Briefing Drawing on internal University documents and data made public as part of the ongoing admissions trial, The Crimson breaks down how Harvard’s admissions process really works.

US Mail Bombs: Cesar Sayoc Charged After Campaign Against Trump Critics A 56 year-old-man named Cesar Sayoc has been arrested in connection to the bombs sent to prominent Democratic figures in the mail over the past week. Sayoc has been to several Trump rallies over the course of the past three years, but Trump has publicly denounced the bomber as a terrorist.

Around the Ivies Yale Yale students waited hours in line to receive limited tickets to the annuale Harvard-Yale game, according to the Yale Daily News. Harvard’s decision to host the game at Fenway this year resulted to a smaller allotment of tickets for Yale students. While Yale Athletics sought to implement measures to alleviate long lines, students still experienced nearly four hours of wait time before receiving their tickets. The athletics department said it is open to feedback from students regarding ways to improve the ticket purchasing process.

UPENN University of Pennsylvania alumnus Jerry Rabinowitz is among 11 people left dead after a shooting at the Tree of Life Congregation in Pittsburgh, according to the Daily Pennsylvanian.

Amy Gutmann, Penn’s president, wrote on her Facebook page to express horror toward the attack, which occurred during a service at the synagogue on Saturday morning. The suspect in the shooting, Robert Bowers, was apprehended by local police after barricading himself in an office. Penn students are organizing a Monday vigil on campus to honor victims of the attack.

DARTMOUTH

Administrators and student leaders of Greek organizations at Dartmouth have collaborated to facilitate conversations about creating safer and more welcoming Greek spaces, according to The Dartmouth. Most notably, the Greek Leadership Council requires students interested in becoming members of Greek organizations attend a session held by the Dartmouth Bystander Initiative. This session seeks to facilitate discussion about sexual violence, alcohol consumption, and ways in which students can help their peers in threatening situations. The council hopes to counteract the stigma associated with Greek life on campus.

The University Daily, Est. 1873

The Harvard Crimson Derek G. Xiao President Hannah Natanson Managing Editor Nathan Y. Lee Business Manager

Associate Managing Editors Mia C. Karr ’19 Claire E. Parker ’19 Associate Business Managers Dahlia S. Huh ’19 Max W. Sosland ’19 Digital Strategists Jamie D. Halper ’20 Caroline S. Engelmayer ’20 Editorial Chairs Cristian D. Pleters ’19 Emmanuel R. R. D’Agostino ’19

Staff for This Issue Arts Chairs Mila Gauvini II ’19 Grace Z. Li ’19

Design Chairs Morgan J. Spaulding ’19 Simon S. Sun ’19

FM Chairs Marella A. Gayla ’19 Leah S. Yared ’19

Multimedia Chairs Amy Y. Li ’20 Ellis J. Yeo ’20

Blog Chairs Lydia L. Cawley ’20 Stuti Telidevara ’20

Technology Chairs Nenya A. Edjah ’20 Theodore T. Liu ’20

Sports Chairs Cade S. Palmer ’20 Jack R. Stockless ’19

Copyright 2018, The Harvard Crimson (USPS 236-560). No articles, editorials, cartoons or any part thereof appearing in The Crimson may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of the President. The Associated Press holds the right to reprint any materials published in The Crimson. The Crimson is a non-profit, independent corporation, founded in 1873 and incorporated in 1967. Second-class postage paid in Boston, Massachusetts. Published Monday through Friday except holidays and during vacations, three times weekly during reading and exam periods by The Harvard Crimson Inc., 14 Plympton St., Cambridge, Mass. 02138 Weather icons made by Freepik, Yannick, Situ Herrera, OCHA, SimpleIcon, Catalin Fertu from flaticon.com is licensed by CC BY 3.0.

Night Editor Brian P. Yu ’19

Design Editors Elena M. Ramos ’20

Assistant Night Editors Sonia Kim ’20 Samuel W. Zwickel ’21

Photo Editors Allison G. Lee ’21 Ellis J. Yeo ’20

Story Editors Caroline S. Engelmayer ’20 Joshua J. Florence ‘19 Angela N. Fu ’20 Kristine E. Guillaume ’20 Mia C. Karr ’19 Hannah Natanson ’19 Claire E. Parker ’19 Alison W. Steinbach ’19

Editorial Editor Robert Miranda ’20 Sports Editor Cade S. Palmer ’20 Jack R. Stockless ’19

Corrections The Harvard Crimson is committed to accuracy in its reporting. Factual errors are corrected promptly on this page. Readers with information about errors are asked to e-mail the managing editor at managingeditor@thecrimson.com.

Page 3

THE HARVARD CRIMSON | OCTOBER 29, 2018

admissions From Page 1

Here’s How the Harvard Admissions Process Really Works The College specifically targets low-income and minority students, as well as high schoolers hailing from less populous sections of America.

Via the Harvard Financial Aid Initiative and the Undergraduate Minority Recruitment Program, College officials and undergraduates make a personal appeal to applicants.

The admissions office contacts candidates individually by telephone and email. Students let high schoolers stay overnight in their dormitories on campus to give them a taste of Harvard life.

Admissions representatives also visit high schools and junior high schools. The 2013 handbook notes that staffers for the Undergraduate Minority Recruitment Program must travel to at least two junior high schools each.

The handbook argues the merits of in-person recruitment efforts.

“A friendly note or phone call to introduce the candidate from sparse county to Harvard can be an important first step,” the handbook states. Admissions officers additionally seek students skilled enough to play a varsity sport at Harvard. According to the 2013 alumni interviewer guidelines, staffers sometimes recruit “prospect[s]” as early as the first day of high school.

Documents released as part of the lawsuit show that recruited athletes see a significant boost in the admissions process.

In the past, Harvard has ranked its applicants’ academic prowess on a scale of 1 to 6; athletes who earned a score of 4 were 1,000 times more likely to win admittance to the College than were non-athletes who received the same score during admissions cycles stretching from the Class of 2014 to the Class of 2019.

STEP 2: ALUMNI INTERVIEW Once recruitment season ends, it’s time for applicants to strut their stuff.

After each Harvard hopeful submits an online application — replete with test scores, transcripts, and personal essays — the vast majority of students sign up for an interview with a College alumnus tasked with evaluating the candidate. More than 15,000 Harvard graduates typically serve as alumni interviewers each year.

Until alumni meet their assigned interviewees face-toface, they know only the basics: full name, phone number, email address, and high school. The interviewers never see the interviewees’ Harvard applications.

Nonetheless, each alumnus later produces a report evaluating the pros and cons of the high schooler they spent roughly 60 minutes getting to know. The interviewer handbook details what criteria the interviewers use to judge applicants — as well as the nitty-gritty of how Harvard wants these conversations to go down.

The handbook instructs interviewers to keep the conversation under an hour and tells them not to suggest a dress code. It also advises against interviewing students in graduates’ homes.

“Some high school guidance counselors explicitly instruct their students to reject offers to meet alumni in their homes,” the document states. “In these cases you should happily suggest an alternative meeting location on neutral ground.”

During the interview, some topics are taboo. Alumni should “avoid prolonged discussions of political and personal issues” and “be wary” of asking where else applicants are applying, according to the handbook. If an interviewer chooses to ask about a student’s grades or test scores, they should do so in “a casual tone,” per the book.

“Your approach in asking for this information can help put candidates at ease and reassure them that grades and standardized test scores are by no means the only things the Admissions

Committee considers,” the handbook states.

According to the 2013 guidelines, interviewers should start with easy-to-answer factual questions and slowly shift to a line of inquiry meant to unearth “motivation, commitment, and level and quality of contribution.”

The handbook suggests sample questions. One Harvard-proposed query asks applicants to describe their “school community” and speak about which of their classes they enjoy and which they do not enjoy.

Another asks, “Do you have a favorite book? Or, which book have you recently read? Do you prefer reading online? What blogs or sites do you read regularly?”

The document also details questions alumni should be asking themselves throughout

“Some high school guidance counselors explicitly instruct their students to reject offers to meet alumni in their homes,” the document states. “In these cases you should happily suggest an alternative meeting location on neutral ground.”

Admissions Handbook

the conversation. Interviewers should ponder an applicant’s “potential,” “maximum growth,” and “direction” while also considering the student’s intellectual and personal “capacity,” according to the hand-

book.

And interviewers should weigh the broader arc of candidates’ lives.

“Does the candidate have a direction yet? What is it? If not, is she exploring many things?

Or is he just letting everything happen to him?” the document states. “Where will the candidate be in one year? Five years?

Twenty-five years? Will she contribute something, somewhere, somehow?”

After the interview, alumni write up short blurbs detailing their interviewee’s strengths and shortcomings. Interviewers summarize the “special contribution” promising candidates could make on campus and how the students would benefit from a Harvard education.

The handbook cautions interviewers to “be aware of, and suspect, [their] own biases” when compiling these reports.

“Since no one can really be ‘objective’ in attempting to evaluate another person, be aware of your biases,” the handbook states. “The good interviewer makes allowances for this, appreciates a point of view on its own merits, and evaluates the interview accordingly.”

Interviewers also assign candidates numerical ratings for their personal, extracurricular, academic, and overall accomplishments. These scores typically range from 1 to 4 — 1 being the highest and 4 being the lowest — with added plus and minus signs that enhance or diminish the ranking.

The 2013 handbook notes that, because ratings are difficult to standardize, the admissions office relies more heavily on interviewers’ written comments than on the numerical scores they assign to students.

“The [Admissions] Committee does not expect to achieve anything approaching national consistency with the use of numerical ratings, so we use them in the most general way to show whether an interview was favorable or unfavorable,” the

document states.

The handbook urges alumni to file their reports within two weeks of receiving their interview assignments.

STEP 3: HARVARD READS APPLICATIONS As students around the world anxiously prepare for alumni interviews, admissions officers back in Cambridge sit down to sift through tens of thousands of applications.

Harvard assigns each admissions officer a geographic region and asks that they read all applications from students living in that area.

The first reader for each application records a Harvard-dictated set of data points and makes note of any missing materials. This year, first readers will take down applicants’ citizenship, race, legacy status, recruited athlete status, socioeconomic background, and standardized test scores, according to reading procedures for the Class of 2023.

First readers also verify labels and scores that identify applicants’ likelihood of qualifying for full financial aid.

Roughly 60 percent of College students receive need-based scholarships and 20 percent pay nothing towards tuition.

“It has long been a priority for Harvard to seek talented students from all backgrounds, including those extraordinary individuals who are able to transcend economic disadvantages and achieve unusual academic distinction,” the document reads.

Admissions officers then move to the numbers. First readers assign applicants scores for their academic achievements, extracurricular accomplishments, athletic prospects, personal qualities, and the strength of the student’s “school support” — meaning their letters of recommendation. Staffers use a slightly different numerical scale for each category, though 1 marks the highest ranking across all scales.

“It has long been a prioirty for Harvard to seek talented students from all backgrounds, including those extraordinary individuals who are able to transcend economic disadvantages and achieve unusual academic distinction.”

Admissions Handbook

The reading procedures offer highly detailed insight into what it takes to earn top marks.

In order to score an academic 1, an applicant must be a “potential major academic contributor” with “summa potential” and “near-perfect scores and grades.” It also helps if the high schooler has “national or international level recognition in academic competitions.”

Those who earn an academic 2 typically score in the mid700s or higher on the SAT — or 33 or higher on the ACT. An academic 3 denotes an applicant with “mid-600 through low700 scores” on the SAT or a 29 through 32 on the ACT. A student with an academic 4, meanwhile, typically boasts “low-to mid-600 scores” on the SAT and between a 26 and 29 on the ACT — academic achievements the admissions office call “adequate preparation” for Harvard. Students who draw a 5 academic ranking typically earn SAT scores in the 500s or an ACT score clocking in at 25 or below. Harvard asserts these high schoolers have only

See admissions Page 7

THE HARVARD CRIMSON |

October 29, 2018

Page 4

Grad Union IDs Ed School Tackles Global Challenges Participants

By Joshua S. Archibald and Ellen M. Burnstein Conributing Writers

By SherA S. Avi-Yonah and Molly C. McCafferty Crimson Staff Writers

Before University administrators and members of Harvard’s graduate student union can begin debating the finer points of their historic first contract, they will have to settle a more basic point: identifying who, exactly, is in the union.

Harvard Graduate Students Union-United Automobile Workers’s roughly 5,000-member bargaining unit comprises graduate and undergraduate teaching and research assistants. As course staffs and lab assignments change, so does the size and composition of the union — a challenge both Harvard and union leadership face as they continue their inaugural contract negotiations, which began earlier this month.

In order to decide what contract proposals are feasible, both sides need to know how many students will be affected.

Harvard is required to provide the union with updated lists of eligible students throughout the semester — a task University administrators say can be challenging.

Even after undergraduates decide on their class schedules, graduate students’ teaching and research commitments can remain in flux; the classes they teach and the labs they work at can change well into the semester.

This summer, in advance of negotiations, the union’s bargaining committee requested a series of documents from the Office of Labor and Employee Relations, a list of HGSU-UAW members among them. The list took months to generate, largely because of the complexity of the bargaining unit, and administrators only produced it in early October.

In an email, Director of Labor and Employee Relations Paul R. Curran pointed to differences across programs, semester-to-semester changes, and varying terminology between schools as factors complicating his office’s effort to produce a comprehensive list.

In many Ph.D. programs in the humanities and social sciences, for example, students begin their teaching requirements only after years of taking classes. In the sciences, however, students often begin lab research in the first months of their doctoral program.

“The HGSU-UAW bargaining unit is unique: while its members are now considered employees of the university, up until now they have exclusive-

ly been considered students,” Curran wrote. “The new employment categories are of short duration, and students often fill different temporary positions over the course of their academ-

“The new employment categories are of short duration, and students often fill different temporary positions over the course of their academic training at Harvard.”

Paul R. Curran Director of Labor and Employee Relations

ic training at Harvard.”

Harvard and the grad union have tussled over the exact composition of the bargaining unit before.

After the University’s first graduate student unionization election, held in Nov. 2016, HGSU-UAW appealed the vote on the grounds that the voter list the University provided was insufficient. That appeal prompted the National Labor Relations Board to throw out the result and mandate that Harvard hold a second election.

In the run-up to the second election, union supporters and University administrators clashed over the voter list yet again, disagreeing on how much time the University should have to generate the roster.

This time, though, HGSU-UAW bargaining committee member Ege Yumusak ’16 wrote in an email that the union is “confident that we have a good sense of who is working in our bargaining unit, including fluctuations from semester to semester.”

“Only Harvard can produce a totally accurate and inclusive list of who is working, therefore good-faith bargaining obligates them to respond to reasonable requests by the union for such information,” she wrote.

“As part of our current negotiations, we have been working with Harvard to obtain this and other information that will help facilitate the bargaining process.” shera.avi-yonah@thecrimson.com molly.mccafferty@thecrimson.com

Four alumni of the Harvard Graduate School of Education discussed their experiences grappling with political and economic challenges facing international education at a forum Friday.

About a hundred people packed into Longfellow Hall for the event, which was part of the Graduate School of Education’s Askwith Forum — a series of public lectures centered on obstacles facing the education industry in the 21st century.

Fernando M. Reimers, a professor at the Graduate School of Education who moderated the event, opened the panel with remarks on the “global significance” of education in a time when he said some people doubt its value.

“We live in times in which some people question the global nature of humanity’s shared work in improving the world,”

Reimers said. “There’s a new form of national populism with xenophobic undertones that suggests that to be a globalist is antithetical to caring for local communities or nations.”

In her opening remarks, LeAnna L. Marr, an education expert and official at the United States Agency for International Development, said although policy frameworks surrounding education and foreign aid vary by administration, the industries continue to receive funding from the government.

“Education still retains high bipartisan support, especially from Congress,” Marr said.

But two other panelists — former Deputy Minister of Education in Colombia Luis E. Garcia de Brigard and World Bank analyst Myra M. Khan — said governments and powerful organizations are not doing enough to support global education and leadership.

Garcia de Brigard argued that governments are not placing sufficient emphasis on

teaching lessons of global citizenship and leadership. “[Governments] need to be brave enough to put in place the incentive systems that are actually aligned with what we’re hoping for,” he said.

Khan described her experience at the World Bank, where she said she saw other sectors such as agriculture and energy receive more funding than education.

“A lot [of ] our big international financial institutions don’t actually put their money where their mouth is,” Khan said.

Khan spoke about the need to fund education around the world, specifically citing girls’ education as an area of concern.

“You need a lot more money. You need a lot more people in education,” she said.

The panel also included Wilson I. Aiwuyor, who worked in the Department of Education under the Obama administration, who said there is “no single solution” to solv-

ing global challenges in education.

Cécile Guédon, a lecturer in Comparative Literature who attended the event, said the panelists introduced her to thinking in a global context and she felt “very inspired.”

“I’m really wondering about the themes of global citizenship, it’s not something we’re supposed to be thinking about very much in our practice here,” she said.

Graduate School of Education student Melissa Donovan said it was invigorating to see alumni speak about how their education at Harvard helped them make an impact in their respective careers.

“It was great to hear, as a student in the [International Education] program, to see the diverse experiences that people have had who have gone through this program and have all taken very different paths toward the same goal of improving the quality and relevance of education abroad,” Donovan said.

Public Service Day Provides Interviews

By Lucy Liu and Matteo n. Wong Contribuing Writers

Eighty-four College seniors interviewed with 21 nonprofit organizations during the College’s fifth annual Public Service Recruitment Day, held at the Student Organization Center at Hilles Friday.

The recruitment program received 261 applications from 147 students, and was able to offer 120 interviews with various public service organizations, Travis Lovett, director of the Center for Public Interest Careers, said.

Around 27 percent of participating students in last year’s program eventually received a job offer from an organization they interviewed with.

Public Service Recruitment Day was organized by the Phillips Brooks House, CPIC, the Office of Career Services, and the Institute of Politics.

The event was designed to mimic the recruitment practices of finance and consulting firms in order to provide students with a clearer path into a public service job, Lovett said.

In an OCS survey given to the Class of 2018, 22 percent of graduating seniors said they planned to work for non-profits or the government — compared to seventy-two percent planning to pursue for-profit jobs —

and University President Lawrence S. Bacow has emphasized the importance of students entering public service.

Many public sector organizations, howerver, hire on a just-in-time hiring model, and sometimes cannot make job offers to students until late spring or early summer, whereas the private sector has the financial resources to recruit in the fall.

Even for students genuinely interested in public sector opportunities, Lovett said the late timeline can pose difficulties.

“For many students, waiting until that point can be pretty challenging. It’s especially stressful for a lot of our first generation college students, or students that have high financial need.”

During its first two years, the recruiting event brought in organizations that were interested in hiring recent graduates, but may not have had concrete job offerings, making it more difficult for students to find a secure position.

“We’ve been more deliberate about trying to identify more competitive programs and trying to identify organizations that do have explicit hiring needs that will set students up for success,” Lovett said.

The Attollo Leadership Fellows, for instance, was looking for talented people rather than just hiring on an as-needed ba-

CPIC staff speak with seniors. Joshua Y. Chiang—CONtributing photographer

sis, CEO Jordan S. Steffy said.

“If we find the right fits and there’s three of them we’ll make three offers. If we find 15 of them we’ll make 15 offers,” Steffy said.

After last year’s Public Service Recruitment Day, Nicholas J. Abbott ’18 was selected by the San Francisco Fellows program.

Now his role has swapped, and he returned to interview and recruit current seniors interested in public service.

“Private sector companies do a great job of recruiting here on campus,” Abbott said.

“I think it’s really great the OCS and CPIC and others have tried to model public service recruiting off of that structure so that people earlier in the year

can find out about those opportunities.”

Lovett said career paths in public service are rarely straightforward.

“The pathways are pretty murky to navigate. People discover nonprofit work or public interest work in such a variety of ways that it is challenging to navigate one individual pathway,” he said.

Several students participating in the event said they were aware they likely would not receive immediate job offers from the day.

“It’s more of a way to encounter new opportunities and get information,” Haley S. Elliott ’19 said. “I think it was very much a ‘do you have questions for me?’ kind of thing.”

Mayor of San Juan Receives PBHA 12th Annual Service Award perienced discrimination and literally were left to die,” Cruz said. “‘Somebody help us,’ was my cry. I am begging you. Mayday.

S.O.S. We are dying here. And you are killing us with your bureaucracy and your inefficiency.”

Both deep emotion and light-hearted joy characterized the evening.

Cruz’s voice cracked audibly while describing Puerto Rico’s lack of clean bathrooms and textbooks for school children, and she also twice led the audience into song with Aretha Franklin’s “Respect” and Michael Jackson’s “Man in the Mirror.”

After the event, Cruz said

Carmen Y. Cruz was honored as the “Call to Service” awardee . MATTHEW J. MARDO—CONtributing photographer

By Liana E. Chow and Elizabeth X. Guo Contributin Writers

Carmen Yulín Cruz , mayor of San Juan, Puerto Rico, was honored as the Phillips Brooks House Association’s 12th Annual Robert Coles “Call of Service” Lecturer & Awardee at Memorial Church Friday evening.

Cruz, who garnered national attention for her criticisms of the Trump administration’s response to Hurricane Maria in 2017, is the first Latina woman to receive this public service honor.

In her lecture, Cruz described the hurricane’s devas-

tation, condemned the federal government’s “neglect” of the island, and urged the audience to “tell the inconvenient truth” and serve those who are suffering during humanitarian crises.

During the program, Mayor of Cambridge Marc C. McGovern presented Cruz with a key to the City of Cambridge.

His introduced his fellow mayor, citing her advocacy for marginalized groups including the BGLTQ and deaf communities.

“I’m a social worker in my background, and seeing the way that—just your passion and the way that you treat people in your community is wonderful,”

McGovern said.

“I think there are a few folks down in DC who might learn a thing or two from you.”

The festivities also included a bomba and spoken poetry performance celebrating Puerto Rican culture, and a special guest: Robert Coles ’50, a professor emeritus, author, and psychiatrist for whom the event is named, was in attendance and received a standing ovation.

Cruz described Hurricane Maria’s impact in Puerto Rico as something that “no human being should have to experience.”

“We experienced darkness.

We experienced hatred. We ex-

“I’m a social worker in my background, and seeing the way that — just your passion and the way that you treat people in your community is wonderful.”

Marc C. McGovern Mayor of Cambridge

she remained optimistic for a more compassionate approach to policy-making.

“We are living in difficult times, but everywhere you look, there are people willing to do

what it takes to change them, and to make them inclusive, and to have diversity be at the forefront of the way that they make policies,” Cruz said.

“We all have to find a way to join together and have a big caravan of hope that will lead us into pushing agencies that are for the common good.”

Audience member Adebola S. Yakubu-Owolewa ’05 asked Cruz if she had considered running for the presidency in 2020.

Cruz explained that her birth in a U.S. territory disqualified her from seeking that office.

Even if she could, Cruz said, the job would not interest her.

“I wouldn’t want that job,” she said. “Sometimes the higher you go in office the more distant you are from the people.”

Yakubu-Owolewa said that she felt Cruz’s work with marginalized communities would have made her a strong candidate.

“In the U.S., or anywhere, you only are going to treat people as well as you treat the most marginalized and vulnerable people. She has seen that in Puerto Rico, and she has fought tirelessly,” Yakubu-Owolewa said.

The “Call of Service” Lecture & Award kicked off PBHA’s annual alumni weekend, which also honored the Harvard Square Homeless Shelter Corporation, Massachusetts Representative Byron D. Rushing ’64, and poet José G. Olivarez ’10.

Michael C. A. Leonard ’17, nonprofit management fellow and project manager of the lecture and award, said that the decision to honor Cruz was confirmed this August.

“We are living in difficult times, but everywhere you look, there are people willing to do what it takes to change them, and to make them inclusive, and to have diversity be a forefront of the way that they make policies.”

Carmen Yulin Cruz Mayor of San Juan, Puerto Rico

“We do a long selection and ranking process and reach out to our candidates after that.

There are students and staff in the room and we try our best to reach a consensus,” Leonard said. “It was pretty easy this year.”

Cruz said that she hopes to continue collaboration and contact with PBHA. “Often, whenever we go to a particular place, something sparks up a light that allows us to make connections and go back, so we go back, we take a look at them and then try to reconnect,” Cruz said.

“But certainly, the Phillips Brooks House initiative is something that we’d like to kind of copy and see how we can do alliances with them to move forward.” liana.chow@thecrimson.com

Page 5

THE HARVARD CRIMSON | October 29, 2018

Diversity From Page I

Vigil From Page I

Report: HKS Still Students Honor Fallen at Gathering Mostly White, Male Douglas W. Elmendorf wrote in an email introducing the report.

“We are not satisfied with the current situation and are committed to taking further steps to improve diversity, as well as inclusion and belonging.”

The Kennedy School last collected internal data on the demographics of its students, faculty, and staff as part of a task force on diversity in 2017. A draft rep ort of the data, leaked to the press, presented stark statistics: African-American and Latinx faculty members numbered in the single digits, women made up less than a third of faculty members, and the yield rate among African- American students was declining, among other findings.

Addressing the lack of faculty diversity it found, the 2017 report read, “Without that diversity, we risk taking narrow views on policy issues important to our students and to the world and to missing important issues altogether.”

Its findings sparked protests and conversations among students and faculty about the dearth of minorities and women at the school.

Acting on the recommendations from the report, the school hired Dean of Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging Robbin Chapman and instituted bias trainings for senior administrators.

Still, a year later, the numbers have hardly budged. According to the latest demographic report, men represented 53 percent of the student body and 71 percent of the faculty — nearly the same percentages as in the 2017 report. Women maintained a significant majority among staff, making up again 70 percent of staffers at HKS. The 2018 report — which only examines U.S. citizens at the school — also provided a breakdown of the demographics of each degree program.

In the Masters in Public Policy program, the largest the school offers, the percentage of African-American students increased from 4 percent in 2015 to 7 percent in 2018. Last year’s report found that students who

“I’m surprised that this report, if it is the inal template, does not reflet historical ata. It seems to be a moment in time report.”

Khalil G. Muhammad HKS Professor

identified as Hispanic constituted 7 percent of the student body in 2015; in 2018, “Hispanic/Latinx” students made up the same proportion.

The number of Asian-American students pursuing the MPP degree, however, increased noticeably between this year and last.

In the 2017 report, Asian Americans made up 7 percent of MPP students, whereas the 2018 report showed Asian-American students represented 17 percent of students.

Chapman said the dean and senior staff — the team which produced this inaugural public report — could not explain the jump.

“That’s part of the work we are going to be doing moving forward,” Chapman said.

The faculty data showed even less of a shift from previous reports.

In the 2018 report, 79 percent of professors identified as white. Only one professor identified as “Hispanic/Latinx,” and the report said two professors are Black or African American.

Elmendorf wrote in his email to HKS affiliates that the 2018 report followed a recommendation from the 2017 task force to conduct follow up studies. He said administrators plan to update these reports “each fall,” and Chapman said the school will release demographic breakdowns every October moving forward.

Several Kennedy School affiliates said the very existence of the report shows the school’s commitment to improving diversity at the school.

“The timing of the report was really important because as students, a lot of us have continued meeting on diversity, equity, and inclusion issues,” Kennedy School Latinx Caucus CoChair Amanda R. Matos said.

“For us, it was timely in the sense that we have a lot planned for this year to make sure that this is still on our administration’s radar.”

Some students pointed to what they consider to be several flaws in the report’s methodology.

HKS Black Student Union President Akina E. Younge said she was “happy” to have concrete numbers but is still concerned about the details of the report.

“I think that’s really important that we have data and information that we can all talk about,” Younge said. “That doesn’t mean that the data is completely correct or representative.”

Specifically, Younge worried the inclusion of students who are completing dual degrees at other Harvard graduate schools inflated the numbers of minorities — rendering the data less representative of the Kennedy School’s full-time student population.

“By including the joint degree [students], it means that, if the purpose is to tell us what the experience is like for people on campus, it’s not actually doing that because this isn’t representing the folks and the experiences of being on campus if we’re including people who are not on campus and who are not in the classroom with us,” she said.

Chapman said the number of students completing joint degrees is “very small compared to the overall number of students” and did not “skew” the data.

HKS Professor Khalil G. Muhammad said the report showed “room for improvement,” especially because it did not contain demographic or admissions data collected from previous years. The document presented only statistics from 2018.

“I’m surprised that this report, if it is the final template, does not reflect historical data.

It seems to be a moment in time report,” Muhammad said.

“It seems to be the only way to measure progress or retrogression over time is to actually see what’s happened in prior years, and this report doesn’t have that.”

In light of the numbers, Elmendorf wrote that the school has begun expanding student recruitment to include more candidates from diverse backgrounds and is “revisiting” the procedures for faculty searches to “de-bias selection processes.”

Still, while racial and ethnic minorities remain very much in the minority, Matos said it is difficult to be confronted with that reality.

“No matter how often I think and breathe and live about issues tied to race and ethnicity, it is still no matter what, very jarring to see when for me, as a person of color, sometimes called a minority, seeing myself reflected in small numbers,” Matos said. “It hits my heart in a way I can never fully be prepared for.” alexandra.chaidez@thecrimson.com

Follow

@thecrimson on Twitter.

You know you want to.

faith.”

Dean of the College Rakesh Khurana also addressed the vigial attendees.

He spoke about voting and politics, saying at one point that he does not “want to live in a society that loves its guns more than its babies.”

He ended his speech with a call to action. “Today we breathe, tomorrow we start working for change,” Khurana said. “We must do both.”

Amitai B. Abouzaglo ’20, who attended the event, said he hopes this event is not the sole reason people go to the polls on Nov. 6.

“Everyone was saying four months ago ‘You better vote.

You want to do something? You better vote. You better do something.’ Don’t make us the altar,” he said.

While the shooting occurred hundreds of miles away, some students said the events Saturday “hit home” for Harvard affiliates of the Jewish faith.

Attendee Ilan M. Goldberg ’20, who serves as Vice President of Community Relations for Hillel, said the historical im-

pact of the tragedy has been on his mind.

In an interview after the vigil, Goldberg said that, as someone whose family came to the United States from Mexico for “safety and in part for better opportunities,” the events Saturday were unsettling.

“I think we’d seen acts of anti-Semitism, swastikas, and maybe anti-Semitic talks and posts, and that kind of thing, but this really was the first and hopefully the last act of mass violence against the Jewish community in the United States,” Goldberg said.

Vice President of Tikkun Olam at Hillel Paulette K. Schuster ’20 said the tragedy in Pittsburgh had personally affected her due to her family history.

“My grandfather was a Holocaust survivor and the rest of my family came to here — to Canada — for exactly the religious safety that Ilan mentioned,” Schuster said.

“I think as generations go, it’s easier to feel more and more secure, and this was a very, very startling reminder for the community that that’s not always

the case.”

“I just want to say thank you... We can do a lot to support each other within the community, but an event like this really causes people to turn inwards and it’s been incredible to feel the pull of the outside in a positive way, the other people lifting us up.”

Ilan M. Goldberg ’20 Vice President of Community Relations for Harvard Hillel

Several Faculty Deans across the College sent emails to their students in the wake of the tragedy to publicize the Sun-

day vigil and to encourage those who felt affected by the events to reach out to House administrators and tutors for support.

“We stand strong in our denunciation of the cowardly act of violence that resulted in the loss of so many innocent lives,” Winthrop Faculty Deans Ronald S. Sullivan Jr. and Stephanie Robinson wrote in an email to House residents. “We stand in solidarity with our Jewish brothers and sisters.”

Reflecting on the heightened emotion and strong bonds of those gathered in the room, Goldberg said he was grateful for those who attended the vigil Sunday evening.

“I want to just say thank you to all of the communities that came out to support us today,” he said.

“We can do a lot to support each other within the community, but an event like this really causes people to turn inwards and it’s been incredible to feel the pull of the outside in a positive way, the other people lifting us up.” aidan.ryan@thecrimson.com

UC Says No to Funds for Student Dinners

By Jonah S. Berger Crimson Staff Writer

The Undergraduate Council voted against establishing two programs at its Sunday meeting, one which would have funded dinners in Harvard Square to help sophomores decide on a concentration, and the other which would have funded student-led advising trips to Boston.

Each initiative would have taken $4,800 from the Student Life Committee’s budget.

The first program proposed providing 40 groups of six students each — four sophomores considering a concentration and two upperclassmen already enrolled in that concentration — with money to eat at a restaurant of their choice in Harvard Square.

Sixteen representatives voted in favor of the measure, while 27 voted against, and one abstained.

The other program would have funded 20 outings into Boston for groups of freshmen and seniors. The trips would have been designed to allow seniors to provide “formal” and “informal” advising for the freshmen, as well as to give seniors the opportunity to reflect on their time at Harvard. The final tally was 18 votes in favor, 21 against, and two abstaining.

Some representatives questioned the merits of the advising initiative, saying it was not an efficient or equitable way to offer mentorship and reflection programs.

Catherine L. Zhang ’19 and Nicholas D. Boucher ’19 at a UC meeting. Jocelyn Wang—Contributing photographer

Dunster House Representative Victor C. Agbafe ’19 said he preferred the Council support existing student groups focused on advising, arguing the UC program could pose a “logistical nightmare” to organize effectively.

“I don’t know if the UC in this situation is the best angle to provide mentorship,” he said. “Let’s work with different student groups because people have common bonds through those groups.”

Adams House Representative K. Yu-Mi Kim ’20 agreed the proposed initiative would

not prove to be a useful allocation of student funds.

“At the end of the day, I don’t think this addresses advising and this is mostly just redistributing money into students’ pockets,” she said. “Basically, the $60 dollars that students pay, we’re just giving it back to them and giving them less freedom.”

Finance committee leaders also announced at the meeting that for the second consecutive week, they had not imposed an across-the-board cut to their weekly grants to student groups, a welcome devel-

opment after a rocky spring semester which saw the Council tap into its “emergency fund” to shore up the committee’s finances.

The committee is operating with a roughly 15 percent higher budget than the spring, partly a result of the 150 percent increase to the student activities fee this year, an optional sum Harvard undergraduates pay as part of enrollment costs.

— Alexandra A. Chaidez contributed reporting. jonah.berger@thecrimson.com

personal From Page I

Race Won’t Play Role in Personal Scores releases a new set of reading procedures to officers each year, though normally the documents remain confidential.

The way the College assigns personal ratings is a key point of conflict in the ongoing Harvard admissions trial, the latest development in a four-yearold lawsuit alleging the University discriminates against Asian-American applicants.

Anti-affirmative action advocacy group Students for Fair Admissions first sued Harvard in Nov. 2014; in the years since, it has specifically alleged that the College systematically assigns qualified Asian-American applicants lower personal scores to justify their exclusion.

As revealed in documents submitted as part of the suit, Harvard admissions officers give each applicant a score for their personality traits that ranges from 1 to 4, with 1 being the highest and 4 the lowest score. A 1 denotes an applicant with “truly outstanding qualities of character” while applicants with “questionable or worrisome qualities of character” are more likely to earn a 4.

A 2013 internal review conducted by Harvard’s Office of Institutional Research found that Asian-American applicants consistently drew lower personal ratings than did appli-

cants of other races. Harvard officials have repeatedly called the report “preliminary and limited.”

While the new guidelines prohibit the use of race when

The consideration of race or ethnicity may be considered only as one factor among many.

Harvard Admissions Office Class of 2023 Reading Procedures

determining personal scores, the documents also urge officers to consider whether a student’s racial or ethnic background “may contribute to the educational benefits of diversity at Harvard College” when assigning overall scores.

“The consideration of race or ethnicity may be considered only as one factor among many,” the guidelines read.

Previous iterations of these guidelines contained no explicit guidance on the use of race.

Previous versions also offered far shorter explanations of how Harvard gives out personal

scores.

Director of Admissions Marlyn C. McGrath ’70 said the admissions office does not give application readers with written guidance on the consideration of race when she took the witness stand in the trial Oct. 19.

Most documents examined in the case — and used in McGrath’s testimony — all date to several years ago. The admissions office drafted the new guidelines for the Class of 2023 in early October.

University spokesperson Anna G. Cowenhoven wrote in an email that the new reading procedures comprise a yearly update to Harvard’s admissions policies, which remain unchanged. She declined to comment on the fact that the procedures explicitly mention race.

“Harvard College’s admissions policies remain the same, the reading procedures are reissued annually and 2023 procedures are this year’s version,” Cowenhoven wrote.

This year’s revised reading procedures also provide detailed instructions on how to assign the controversial personal ratings.

The added instructions emphasize that admissions officers should consier “characteristics not always synonymous with

extroversion” and that “particularly reflective” or “insightful” applicants should earn higher personal ratings.

SFFA lawyers introduced the reading procedures in court Wednesday after Tia M. Ray ’12, a Harvard admissions officer and director of the Undergraduate Minority Recruitment Program, testified under cross-examination that she was aware the College had published written guidelines on the usage of race in the admissions process .

The revised reading procedures merely “enforced what we have been doing in practice” and are “absolutely not” a change in the admissions process, Ray said.

In earlier testimony, Dean of Admissions and Financial Aid William R. Fitzsimmons ’67 affirmed that Harvard has not, in recent history, relied on race when calculating the personal ranking.

“We do not endorse, we abhor, stereotypical comments.

This is not part of our process,” he said.

“This is not who I am, and this is not who our admissions committee members are.” delano.franklin@thecrimson.com iris.lewis@thecrimson.com cindy.zhang@thecrimson.com

THE HARVARD CRIMSON |

October 29, 2018

Proud to cover Harvard for 145 years and counting.

Keep the old sheet flying.

The Crimson thecrimson.com

Page 6

Page 7

THE HARVARD CRIMSON | October 29, 2018

admissions From Page 3

An Inside Look at How Harvard Accepts Applicants “marginal potential.”

In the extracurricular category, a 1 denotes “possible national-level achievement or professional experience.” High schoolers can hope for a 2 if they serve as “class president, newspaper editor [or] concertmaster.”

An athletic 1, meanwhile, indicates the student could compete in his or her sport “at the national, international or Olympic level.”

In line with past years, the reading procedures for the Class of 2023 also detail how admissions officers calculate personal scores. This year’s iteration, though, is far more fleshed-out than old guidelines.

While previous versions of the procedures summed up what it takes to score a personal 1 in a single word — “outstanding” — the 2023 booklet devotes a whole paragraph to the topic.

“Truly outstanding qualities of character; student may display enormous courage in the

face of seemingly insurmountable obstacles in life,” the document reads. “Student may demonstrate a singular ability to lead or inspire those around them.

Student may exhibit extraordinary concern or compassion for others. Student receives unqualified and unwavering support from their recommenders.”

How Harvard assigns personal scores forms a key point of dispute in the ongoing admissions trial.

Students for Fair Admissions has alleged Harvard unfairly assigns qualified Asian Americans lower scores for their personal traits as part of a campaign to systematically deny them admission. The University rejects these allegations.

Finally, in a section titled “School Support,” the procedures outline how admissions officers should rank letters of recommendation penned by teachers and guidance counsel-

ors.

If a letter writer describes the student as “the best of a career” or “one of the best in many years,” that student is likely to earn a 1. If, however, the applicant is merely “one of the best” or “the best this year,” they are more likely to score a 2.

Most applications see only two readers. The second person who reads the application — always another employee in the admissions office — checks facts and records applicants’ scores in an internal database.

Harvard professors occasionally review portions of an application if it includes notable academic or artistic work.

STEP 4: COMMITTEES TAKE A VOTE Following the reading and ranking, the best-scoring applications go before two successive Admissions Office committees. A majority of each committee must vote “yes” on any given applicant for a student to

win a spot at Harvard.

The Class of 2023 reading procedures indicate that all applications with a 2- overall score or better should proceed to the committee phase. The first reader decides on a caseby-case basis whether those who earn a 3+ will proceed, while those scoring a 3 or worse typically do not advance.

The first committees that examine all applications are smaller sub-committees comprising five to eight people each.

Every one of these committees focuses on applicants hailing from a particular geographic region; the subcommittees are staffed by admissions officers, faculty readers, and a senior admissions office employee who serves as chair.

The subcommittees’ discussions and debates over applications can be rather lengthy.

“Subcommittees may discuss a single case for half an hour or even more before voting on a recommendation to offer

the full Committee,” the 2013 interviewer handbook states.

The subcommittees work throughout the fall and winter as officers slog through the early action and regular decision cycles.

“Subcommittees begin meeting in November for the Early Action process and for three- to four-day shifts in late January until the end of February for the Regular Decision process,” the handbook states.

The subcommittee holds a vote to determine which applicants to pass on to the full admissions committee comprising 40 application readers.

A simple majority of the subcommittee must vote in an applicant’s favor for that student to move to the next phase.

The full committee scrutinizes and votes on each application at least once. It, too, obeys a simple majority rule.

But the full committee can be fickle. It often changes its mind, revisiting its decisions to

The inside scoop on Harvard, straight to your inbox.

Never be out of the loop.

The Crimson

thecrimson.com/subscribe

accept — or reject — borderline applicants.

The flexibility of the process preserves “the possibility of changing decisions virtually until the day the Admissions Committee mails them,” according to the 2013 interviewer handbook.

STEP 5: FINAL DECISION In mid-December, Harvard will inform early action applicants of their fate. In late March, the College will do the same for regular decision candidates.

Though this year’s class is heading into the process with a much more detailed knowledge of Harvard admissions than any applicant pool in recent history, they share at least one trait with decades of their peers.

Until that email pops up in their inbox, all they can do is wait. delano.franklin@thecrimson molly.mccafferty@thecrimson

THE HARVARD CRIMSON | OCTOBER 29, 2018

Page 8

Editorial The Crimson Editorial board

Column

Vote No on Ballot Question One

Harvard’s Kindness Problem

T

his coming November, Massachusetts voters will be called on to vote on three ballot measures.

The first concerns nurse-patient ratios in Massachusetts hospitals. Specifically, it calls for a legal limitation on the number of patients assigned to each nurse, though this limit would vary based on the conditions of each hospital unit.

While there are many valid arguments on both sides of this debate, voters should vote no on this referendum, and any reforms in this area should be made by legislators who are informed by healthcare experts.

This ballot question could have huge implications, for better or for worse. It may be true that California, the only state to have successfully executed such a measure, saw no clear link between staffing ratios and increased quality of care in California hospitals, according to research conducted by the University of California, San Francisco.

However, the Health Policy Commission — an independent state agency — estimates that the passing of this referendum in Massachusetts will cost between 676 million to 949 million dollars per year. Thus, this decision could result in

an increase in insurance premiums.

At the same time, research from UCSF concluded that in California, nurses saw improved pay, lower burnout, and lower

For a proper discussion around this important issue, vote no on Ballot Question One. injury rate.

Nevertheless, while the effects of this ballot measure could be large and numerous, so are its complexities. Healthcare is one of this country’s most complex and controversial issues.

As a result, it does not seem wise to give the general public, most of whom will not have any expertise regarding healthcare issues, ultimate power to enact this measure into law.

Indeed, more time and a more indepth analysis of the implications of this ballot measure are required to make an informed decision.

It is lawmakers who should discuss this important issue. When they do, we

hope that the concerns of nursing unions are given serious credence. Nurses are extremely important to both the proper functioning of hospitals and society at large; the work they do is vital and irreplaceable. As such, their voices and any suggestions they may have to improve their and their patients livelihoods should be seriously considered.

Although we are calling for voters to vote no on this ballot measure, we are not calling for the dismissal of this issue, but rather that it be given more careful consideration by legislators — who can improve and amend it. Because of the complexity of healthcare issues, the general public is not able to make a well-informed decision.

For a proper discussion around this important issue, vote no on Ballot Question One. This staff editorial solely represents the majority view of The Crimson Editorial Board. It is the product of discussions at regular Editorial Board meetings. In order to ensure the impartiality of our journalism, Crimson editors who choose to opine and vote at these meetings are not involved in the reporting of articles on similar topics.

Gubernatorial Candidate Jay Gonzalez held a press conference at the Harvard T Stop to propose an endowment tax that would cost Harvard half a billion a year. AMY Y. LI—Crimson photographer

Harvard Should Pay Its Fair Share

By JAY GONZALEZ

M

embers of the Harvard community, I’m reaching out about my recent proposal to tax the endowments of the wealthiest universities in our state.

I’m Jay Gonzalez, the Democratic nominee for Governor of Massachusetts.

I’m running for Governor to take on the big challenges we face and make Massachusetts a leader again.

Today, too many working families are being left behind. We have a public education system that is failing too many young people. Our transportation system is among the worst in the country and impacts our quality of life every day as we are stuck in traffic or on disabled trains. Yet Governor Charlie D. Baker ’79 is satisfied with the status quo.

I’m not. That’s why I’ve proposed investing significant new resources into our education and transportation systems, starting with a modest tax on the robust endowments of the wealthiest private colleges and universities in Massachusetts.

As Governor, I’d file legislation to raise an additional $1 billion annually through a 1.6 percent tax on the value of endowments exceeding $1 billion. There are currently nine colleges and universities impacted with combined endow-

ments totaling over $65 billion. Harvard University has a $39 billion endowment and does not pay income tax. One report estimated that Harvard University, with an endowment of more than $30 billion, received the equivalent of $48,000 in taxpayer subsidies for each of its 6,700 undergraduate students. I strongly believe we need to do more to help students attending our public colleges and universities, particularly because they are the ones most likely to stay and live in Massachusetts after graduation.

Some have pushed back, saying that Harvard’s robust endowment is used to fund financial aid to needy students. To put that argument in perspective, Harvard and other wealthy universities pay more in endowment management fees than they invest in scholarships for low-income students.

And even after Harvard and other universities invest endowment resources in financial aid and all of the important work they do, their endowments have still grown at an average annual rate of 4.8 to 8.4 percent over the last 15 years. Therefore, a modest tax of 1.6 percent should allow Harvard to keep doing everything it does today while still growing its endowment at a rate that far exceeds inflation.

I understand that this proposal comes at a time when higher education institu-

tions feel under siege. Admissions policies are being challenged, competition for students and faculty is intense and growing internationally, and President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress attack, rather than support, your community.

I want to be clear: I support and appreciate you and the incredible institution you work for and attend. We’re fortunate to have Harvard University in Massachusetts. It helps drive our knowledge-based and innovation-oriented economy. But as important as Harvard and the other impacted colleges and universities are to our state, our most important asset is our people. I am running for Governor to make a difference for all the working families being left behind.

The people of Massachusetts are my top priority.

I know it’s controversial. But we all have an obligation to ensure that we are building an economy that works for everyone in our state, not just those at the top. My endowment tax proposal is fair, and it’s the right thing to do. The new tax revenue will result in a better-educated and more mobile workforce, a stronger economy, and a better quality of life for working families being left behind.

—Jay Gonzalez is the Democratic nominee for Governor of Massachusetts.

Jenna M. Gray better left (UN)said

H

ow would you describe Harvard students? Those aspiring to join our ranks might call us smart, the best and the brightest. We might like to think of ourselves as ambitious and hardworking. After three years on this campus, I Iament the reality unbeknownst to or ignored by both parties: Harvard students are exceptionally rude.

Before enrolling here, I knew just as much about Harvard as the average American who’s seen Legally Blonde three times: diddly squat. For example, I thought wealthy students would keep their dorms tidy. Getting paid to clean up their mold-laden bedrooms and piss-stained bathrooms that had seen more rat feces than Febreze taught me otherwise. Similarly, I assumed training through boarding schools, country clubs, and cotillions would produce well-mannered undergrads.

This past August, I returned to campus after eight months away. As I toted moving boxes to my dorm, doors were slammed in my face and couldn’t-be-bothered-to-help bystanders greeted me upon my arrival. While I scanned my surroundings in a search for basic human decency, I could practically hear my peers saying, “Those boxes look heavy. Lol, have fun!”

I hold doors open for people all the time. Not in a radical act of feminism or to upend gender roles; I just think it’s a nice thing to do. It’s also a revealing social phenomenon, as I typically receive one of two responses. First: no acknowledgement of the act, no “thank you,” which seems to be a taboo in Harvard vernacular. Second: an overwhelming gratitude — a degree of gratitude typically reserved for a higher power — because such an act never happens here.

Harvard students’ lack of manners pops up on all corners of campus, in every form of action.

There’s the classic “acting brand new,” when people like to pretend that they don’t know you. It doesn’t matter that you’ve shared the womb with someone; some impenetrable force requires Harvard students to evade eye contact with you and refuse to say hello.

Don’t bother providing an oral history of every class and extracurricular you’ve been in together — they’ll still introduce themselves to you as if you’re just meeting for the first time.

The signature Harvard misbehavior occurs in matters involving commitment. In life’s bakery, Harvard students are croissants: typically European in origin, but more importantly, supremely flaky. With them, there’s little use in setting a date and time for plans; your planner will become most useful when thrown into a fire, heating your flaked-on self.

Harvard students show up late to and skip events as they please, often using the excuses of being busy — as if no one else were — and selfcare, which purportedly absolves us of any responsibility. Such excuses preclude reflection of what disregarding other people’s needs might say about our character and degree of selfishness.

They disguise inconsideration under the alleged intention of being kind to oneself.

Any kindness we exhibit on this campus is selective. If and only if you can advance my social status, get me a job, or pose as my attractive friend in Instagram photos, I will deign to treat you nicely. Otherwise, a mere smile, “Hello!”, or even acknowledgement of the space you occupy is too much to ask.

Why are Harvard students so rude? Does extending courtesy demand too much time or effort? Most of us aren’t busy as we and our flamboyant Google Calendars like to suggest. I routinely see people who claim constant occupation engaged in needless activity: wasting hours on social media, collecting dust in the dining hall, or eating their boogers in the library. I imagine the resolute dedication to disregarding basic human decency requires far more emotional investment than exhibiting manners does.

Entitlement runs rampant on this campus.

We feel entitled to admission to exclusive organizations, internships, and job opportunities. We feel entitled to other people giving us time and attention. But that entitlement seems to be a one way street that serves to allow us to neglect and de-prioritize any action that seemingly doesn’t meet our immediate self interest.

Although treating people with respect and acting cordially may create a healthy social ecosystem, our self-centeredness prevents us from valuing that.

The solution is simple: be nicer! I suggest this quick fix with the understanding that doing so might be contrary to the Harvard ethic. The preamble to the Harvard constitution seems to read “We the opportunistic people,” which makes students weary of aiding anyone who cannot immediately return the favor.

Experience may have led you to believe that you don’t build a Harvard-worthy resume without letting a few doors slam in your peers’ faces along the way. Kindness and ambition might seem mutually exclusive, the former costly in a competitive world.

Even if the actions don’t stem from the kindness of your heart, take the time to acknowledge people and find ways to make their lives a little easier and brighter. Fake it ‘til you make it — even if you follow these steps and feel like a cold-hearted fraud, crook, or nincompoop, you can at least put “well-versed in basic human decency” on your resume. I’ll even endorse your skills in “manners” and “acting” on LinkedIn. —Jenna M. Gray ’19 is a Sociology concentrator in Leverett House. Her column appears on alternate Mondays.

Page 9

Sports

this week’s games

preview

THE HARVARD CRIMSON |

friday ______________________________________

saturday ______________________________________

sunday ______________________________________

Women’s Tennis - Harvard Invitational 8:00am at the Murr Center

Fencing - Penn State Open 8:00am at Penn State Open

Men’s Water Polo at MIT 11:00am at MIT

Women’s Ice Hockey at Quinnipiac 6:00pm at Quinnipiac

Football v. Columbia 12:00pm at Harvard Stadium

october 29, 2018

men’s ice hockey

Harvard Drops Overtime Contest to Dartmouth, 7-6 By stuti r. telidevara cRIMSON STAFF Writer

HANOVER, N.H. — Coming into overtime, the Harvard men’s hockey team’s season opener against Dartmouth had already checked off just about everything you’d want to see in a hockey game. Goals aplenty, as the squads were tied, 6-6, after 60 minutes. Dramatic penalties galore. Even broken glass, the victim of a hard point shot during a Crimson power play, that required a brief delay to replace. An enthusiastic Big Green home crowd settled in for extra hockey, waiting to see how much longer the contest would go on.

Not very long, as it turned out. Just 18 seconds into overtime, Dartmouth sophomore forward Quin Foreman beat Harvard senior net-minder Michael Lackey, sending Thompson Arena into raptures. The Big Green (1-0-0, 1-0-0 ECAC) handed the Crimson (0-1-0, 0-10) its first season-opening loss since 2011 with a barn-burner that featured five erased leads.

“We had some positives and negatives, but we battled real hard,” said junior defenseman Adam Fox. “When you have a lead going into the third you want to hold it, and we persevered really well…but overall it’s disappointing not to come away with the win.”

After conceding a power play goal halfway through the first period, Harvard found itself on the receiving end of three straight man-advantage opportunities. For the first two of those, the power play unit — significantly different, and younger, than last year’s — had enough chances to tilt the shot clock wildly in the Crimson’s favor.

On the final power play, with a little over a minute remaining in the period, the visitors finally broke through, as sophomore forward Jack Badini cleaned up

loose change around the Dartmouth net. Twenty seconds later, junior forward Colton Kerfoot got his first career goal, once again after a tussle in the blue paint.

The floodgates opened from there, and with that came some extracurricular activities. The middle 20 saw seven penalties, including a contentious embellishment call against Badini that had head coach Ted Donato ’91 fuming on the bench.

Each team potted two goals in the second; both Harvard goals came on the power play, from sophomore defenseman Reilly Walsh and rookie forward Baker Shore. The Big Green retaliated after each Crimson tally, bringing the score after two periods to 4-3 with the visitors leading.

“The game was choppy,” coach Donato said. “Which is somewhat to be expected, first game of the year, whatnot. But I liked the resilience of the group; [they] kept coming back.”

Additional power play goals in the third from Walsh and Fox, however, were not enough to preserve Harvard’s lead.

Dartmouth entered the final period with extra energy, finding twine three times. The Big Green’s dangerous top line, with only one tally to its name against the Crimson coming into the game, combined three minutes after intermission for the go-ahead goal, and the team did not fall behind again.

Despite the loss, Harvard has numerous positive takeaways, the most significant being the power play’s 5-for-7 contribution. The goal-scoring extravaganza also featured rookies notching their first points in crimson and white: forward Baker Shore tallied on the man advantage, while defenseman Jack Rathbone and forwards Jack Drury and Casey Dornbach each picked up assists. “[Assistant coach] Rassey

FIRE AND ICE Tempers flared as the Crimson and Big Green combined for 14 minor penalties in the contest.

does a great job with our powerplay,” coach Donato said. “We have some excellent players that shoot the puck and I thought we scored in a number of different ways…. That’s certainly a positive coming out of the game. If we get a game with five power play goals and score six goals, we should be able to taste victory after a game like that.”

Momentum on the 5-on-4s was driven by point shots from defensemen like Walsh, Fox, and Rathbone — unsurprising,

given the Crimson blue line’s experience and skill. Saturday night was a multi-point outing for both Fox (1–3—4) and Walsh (2–0—0), which bodes well for a team with a young forward corps.

“We have some new pieces that are still trying to…find their chemistry,” Fox said. “Coming back for the third year and having the experience I have, the thing I want to do is step up, be a leader on this team and produce in every way I can.”

timothy r. o’meara—Crimson photographer

Opening the season for the first time in his career, Lackey (7.04 GAA, .741 SV%) had alternating bursts of poise and shakiness. He stopped multiple breakaways, and slid pipe to pipe to rob a charging Dartmouth forward, to the chagrin of Thompson Arena. Still, conceding seven goals — five of which were at even strength — makes any contest difficult to win.

“I’m not taking [Lackey] off the hook either,” said coach

Donato when asked if the onus for the Crimson’s goals against should be on the skaters or the goalie. “There’s five guys on the ice before it gets to the goalie… but I don’t think we got a good enough effort there to win either.”

The team will get back to righting the ship with a slate of home games next weekend, as Harvard plays host to Quinnipiac and Princeton. stuti.telidevara@thecrimson.com

men’s soccer

Dartmouth Cleanly Defeats Harvard 2-0 in Hail, Rain

By Eamon J. McLoughlin cRIMSON STAFF Writer

The Harvard men’s soccer team (3-11, 1-4 Ivy) fell to Dartmouth (5-5-5, 2-1-2) by a score of 2-0 in Hanover, N.H., on Saturday. Men’s soccer was one of six Crimson teams to make the trip up to New Hampshire to face its Ivy League rival in rainy conditions over the weekend.

Harvard’s last time out saw the team deal with even worse conditions, when its non-conference matchup versus Northeastern on Tuesday was cancelled due to persistent lightning. Despite playing just over an hour against their crosstown rivals, the game was delayed and eventually abandoned. NCAA rules require 70 minutes of play for a match to

count towards a team’s standings, and thus, Tuesday’s game ended up being no more than a friendly for Harvard.

Saturday’s conditions were not much better, as the game saw rain and temperatures hovering in the 30s. The match was played in spite of this, with the team from up north seeming to make better use of the weather.

“It was tough to adjust to

the way the field was playing, it made the game more scrappy at times,” senior midfielder Eduardo Cedeno said. “I think Dartmouth kind of took the initiative at the beginning and put us on the back foot, but once we got a hold of it, it became back and forth with two evenly matched teams.”

Dartmouth found its first chance in the 22nd minute,

DAY AT DARTMOUTH The men’s soccer team was one of six teams to travel to Hanover, N.H., this weekend. Timothy R. O’MEARA—Crimson photographer

when it was awarded a penalty after Harvard committed a foul in the 18-yard box. Forward Eduvie Ikoba converted for Dartmouth for his first goal of the season, to put Dartmouth ahead inside half an hour.

Dartmouth went to work putting pressure on the Harvard defense from the get-go.

Sophomore goalkeeper Matt Freese was forced into three saves in the opening seven minutes but benefited from more breathing room as the game went on.

The Crimson looked more lively after conceding, moving up the field and beginning to test Dartmouth’s keeper. Despite this increased intensity, Harvard went into the break down by a goal.

“There were moments, especially at the end of the first half, where we had Dartmouth kind of pinned back,” Cedeno said. “We were connecting a lot of passes, moving the ball from left to right, and getting into really good spots. For us I think that was the biggest positive.”

Freese was busy in the net for Harvard, making a career-high nine saves during the hardfought, wet matchup. He now leads the Ivy League in saves per game, averaging 5.45 stops per match in the Crimson goal.

Despite Freese’s and the rest of the team’s best efforts, Dartmouth doubled its lead shortly after halftime. With ten minutes played in the half, Ikoba bagged his second goal of the game, and second of the season.

Harvard struggled to respond, with the game ending with a scoreline of 2-0.

“Obviously the end result wasn’t the greatest for us,” senior forward Nate Devine said.

“But I actually thought it was a pretty decent performance for

us in terms of fighting until the end.”

Harvard finished the match with eight shots, two of them forcing saves from Dartmouth’s keeper. Dartmouth, in contrast, racked up 22 shots on the night, eleven of which were on target.

Harvard were awarded five corners on the night, with Dartmouth finished the match with eight.

Harvard maintains the slight advantage in the all time series versus Dartmouth, with Saturday’s match cutting Dartmouth’s deficit to only six matches, at 44-38-10. The two programs tend to play close games, with Saturday being the first time in twelve years that the matchup was decided by more than one goal.

Saturday’s match drops Harvard to seventh in the Ivy League, with three points, while Dartmouth now sits in fourth place, with eight. Harvard’s only conference win this season came against Yale in late September, and it’ll be looking to round out the season with wins against Columbia and Penn in the coming weeks. Harvard will be celebrating its seniors in its next time out, as its set to host Columbia this Saturday, in its final home matchup of the season.

“Although we’re eliminated from Ivy League and postseason contention, I think playing in these games is really important for the young players especially,” Devine said. “Being a fifth-year senior, I think it falls on my shoulders a little bit to show them how to fight to end, no matter what the score is. Putting the young players in those positions is definitely going to help them for the future.” eamon.mcloughlin@thecrimson.com

Sports Weekend Recap

SCORES

Field Hockey

Women’s ice hockey @ Cornell L, 3-2 ________________________________________________________

men’s soccer @ dartmouth l, 2-0 ________________________________________________________

Women’s Volleyball vs. Columbia w, 3-0 ________________________________________________________

men’s Water Polo vs. iona w, 16-4 ________________________________________________________

men’s water polo vs. st. francis (n.y.) w, 14-12 ________________________________________________________

women’s volleyball vs. cornell l, 3-1 ________________________________________________________

football @ no. 20/arv Dartmouth l, 24-17 ________________________________________________________

men’s ice hockey @ dartmouth l, 7-6 ________________________________________________________

women’s ice hockey @ colgate l, 1-0 ________________________________________________________

women’s soccer @ Dartmouth l, 3-1 ________________________________________________________

Timothy R. O’MEARA—Crimson photographer

no. 6 harvard wins ivy title By ben stern contributing Writer

The No. 6 Harvard field hockey team added to its ledger of achievements on Saturday, notching a 6-0 win over Dartmouth to earn at least a share of the 2018 Ivy League title. Extending a program-record win streak to 12, the Crimson also clinched a berth in the NCAA tournament. The postseason appearance will be the program’s second in the last three years and sixth all-time.

“It feels amazing,” sophomore midfielder Tessel Huibregtsen said. “We have such a strong team and even under these conditions — away game, bad weather, and the pressure of being to secure the share of a championship — we can execute our plans.”

Harvard (15-1, 6-0 Ivy) dominated the entire game despite the frigid, rainy conditions, putting 21 shots on goal. The Big Green (6-9, 2-4) managed only one, which was handled easily by freshman goalkeeper Ellie Shahbo. Shahbo has now won her last nine starts and conced-

ed only three goals.

“My defense makes it very easy for me,” Shahbo said with a laugh. “I don’t actually have to do that much. I was just sitting around getting cold today.”

Junior midfielder Casey Allen opened the scoring at 22:15 with a quick finish at the end of a penalty corner sequence, and junior forward Maddie Earle followed with a goal of her own a few minutes later.

The Crimson entered the locker room at half nursing a 2-0 lead and looking for insurance. It got it from Allen, who found the net again at 39:49 to put Harvard up 3-0 and later tallied an assist to finish with a career-high five points.

Senior back Olivia Allin whipped a shot into the top shelf shortly after, and Earle then scored again to put the game essentially out of reach. Earle’s pair pushed her total to 14 goals, and she now sits atop the division in the category.

Junior midfielder Bente van Vlijmen put the cherry on top of the win with a flick into the cage at 66:41. The Dutch native paced the team with eight shots,

all on goal.

“One of our big mottoes this year is ‘next five minutes’ and just stay focused,” van Vlijmen said. “We were all super happy.”

Clearly, she took that message to heart on Saturday, when neither sleet nor the efforts of Big Green senior goalkeeper Hailey Valerio could prevent her from eventually breaking through for a goal.

For the team’s leadership, the moment was even more special. The program won a banner in 2016, but after a disappointing 2017 season, the seniors are thrilled to be back on top.

“The growth over the past four years has been fantastic, and it has been an honor to be a part of it with my senior classmates,” co-captain Kathleen Young said. “This season we’ve seen success because our goals have been process-based. Our team goal is to improve every game and . . . see what the outcome is at the end of the game.”

Head coach Tjerk van Herwaarden was proud of his squad.

“We knew what [this game] was going to be, and we mentally prepared for it,” van Her-

waarden said. “This team is on a mission. We did a good job of being able to control the controllables.”

The Crimson will honor its seniors as it takes on Columbia on Nov. 3 on its home turf,

where it is undefeated this season. Harvard spoiled Dartmouth’s senior game, and it will try to ensure that the Lions can’t return the favor. With a win, the Crimson will gain sole possession of the Ivy League throne,

and the program is hungry.

“We didn’t celebrate too much today,” van Herwaarden said. “We want to win outright on our home field. We don’t want to share this title with anyone.”

five-time champs Harvard earned a share of the crown in its 6-0 win. Timothy R. O’MEARA—Crimson photographer

tennis

Freshman Shi Accustoms Himself to Collegiate Tennis By lev cohen contributing Writer

Brian Shi is a gifted tennis player. The freshman, the sixth-best recruit in the nation according to the Tennis Recruiting Net-

work, is one of the top tennis recruits in recent Harvard history. But Shi’s path to the Crimson was neither conventional nor smooth.

The Jericho, N.Y., native has been playing tennis since he

shi’s the man Freshman Brian Shi competes in an international tournament prior to joining Harvard’s tennis team. Photo courtesy of Brian Shi

was five. When asked why he became such a serious tennis player, he pointed immediately to his first coach, Mihai Grecu, whom he worked with until he was 16.

“I guess he saw some sort of talent in me — I mean I was a five-year-old so I have no idea what kind of talent a five-yearold could have — but from there he got me super into it,” Shi said.

“I started playing tournaments when I was eight or nine and he was a big part of my life.”

Shi did not go to a physical high school. Instead, in order to ensure that he had the time and freedom to travel around the world for tennis, he spent all four years of his secondary education in online school. His classes had a start date and an end date with suggested deadlines in between, but it was up to him to decide when and where to study. When he was not playing in tournaments or practicing, he was usually at home or working from a hotel.

“In that aspect it was kind of like I had to be responsible finishing my work, because I did not have someone looking over me all the time,” Shi said. “So basically I taught myself everything online and then got feedback from teachers.”

Shi had pushed to move to an online school because he knew how much time it would give him to improve his tennis, but it was not an easy decision for his family. Shi said his parents,

who immigrated to New York from China in their twenties, are tough and academically focused and would have preferred him to stay in a more traditional school setting.

“When I started doing really well at the end of eighth grade, I started traveling a lot and my grades started dipping because I was missing so much school,” Shi said. “My teachers were not really that accommodating, so I guess my parents were kind of forced to put me into online school.”

Soon after attaining his desired move to online school, Shi came close to quitting the sport he loved. When he was 14, right after he recorded one of the best results of his career, the New York native developed rhabdomyolysis, a breakdown of muscle tissue that Shi said came from training too hard without letting his body recover.

He spent a week in the hospital and felt lethargic for the rest of the year. Training and matches became exceedingly difficult while he recovered, but Shi decided to stick with the sport.

It paid off. Shi eventually regained his strength and quickly improved. By the end of high school, he had posted a career high ITF junior tour ranking of No. 62 and participated in the main draw of the 2017 Junior US Open and the 2018 Australian Open.

In his first year of collegiate competition, he has been

thrown straight into the fire, holding his own against some of the best college players in the country in Harvard’s first three fall tournaments. Months into his college career, Shi is confident that he will play high in the lineup this season. The Crimson’s season starts in earnest next semester, but it is already apparent that Harvard has something special in Shi. “Brian is very strong, very balanced, moves well,” said Harvard coach Andrew Rueb ‘95. “He’s got an excellent serve that can be even more of a weapon. He’s got an all-court approach. He plays aggressive tennis. You can see him out on court and he can put together games and sets that can beat anybody.”

Co-captain Chris Morrow thinks Shi has hit the ground running and fits in well with the team.

“He’s adjusted really well and is engaging with the team in a really positive way,” Morrow said. “He’s really humble and is a really willing learner who is open to feedback.”

The Jericho native believes that he is still getting acclimated to college life both on and off the court. He pinpointed that the key difference on the court is that in college.

“You’re always playing someone good,” Shi said. “It’s important to stay confident all the time even when you’re losing more than you’re used to.”

Off the court, the standout freshman said that the transition back into a normal classroom setting and particularly having timed tests was initially challenging but that it was nothing he had not been through before. He added that he has really started to get used to the workload over the last few weeks.

Rueb believes that the freshman star’s untraditional high school experience will help him as both a student and an athlete going forward.

“He got a chance to manage his workload, his AP classes, and some of the other things he did.” Rueb said. “To do that on the road requires a very high level of time-management skills.”

Shi is excited about his future with the Crimson. As for what will come after Harvard, that is still up in the air, as it is for so many college athletes.

However, the first-year has been giving it some thought.

“I think when you get into Harvard your priorities change a little bit when you’re an athlete,” Shi said. “I see a bunch of the older guys on the team are looking at jobs and interviewing for jobs, so it makes you think about what you want to do after tennis.”

But Shi is not closing the door on a tennis career after graduation.

“I still want to go pro after college,” Shi said. “I still want to go for it.”