The Harvard Crimson THE UNIVERSITY DAILY, EST. 1873
|
VOLUME CXLIX, NO. 65
|
CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS
|
WEDNESDAY, MAY 4, 2022
OP ED PAGE 8
NEWS PAGE 9
SPORTS PAGE 10
I am a Harvard Crimson editor and I stand with Israel
University CFO Tom Hollister says Harvard in ‘healthy’ financial state
Men’s lacrosse succumbs to Yale in heartbreaking overtime defeat
FAS Votes to End SFFA Submits Brief to Supreme Court Shopping Week By RAHEM D. HAMID and NIA L. ORAKWUE CRIMSON STAFF WRITERS
By ARIEL H. KIM and MEIMEI XU CRIMSON STAFF WRITERS
arvard faculty voted narrowH ly to eliminate shopping week in favor of a previous-term course registration system on Tuesday, ending a decades-old scheduling quirk that allowed students to sample courses before enrolling during the first week of each semester. More than 60 percent of faculty voted in favor of the previous-term registration system, which will require students to register for classes at the end of the previous semester, starting for Spring 2024. The vote comes despite organizing efforts from students and some high-profile professors who lobbied faculty to keep shopping week. With the passage of the proposal on Tuesday, the Faculty of Arts and Sciences formed a committee of faculty, students, and administrators who will be tasked with crafting an implementation plan for the new system. Under the newly-adopted
system, students will be able to add or drop courses without instructor approval during the first week of the semester. Instructors will be required to prepare course material earlier. In addition, student advising timelines will adjust to the new course registration schedule. The legislation also calls for “technological enhancements” to make Harvard’s course registration process smoother. Faculty debated the new system for about one hour prior to the vote at Tuesday’s faculty meeting. Bernhard Nickel, professor of Philosophy who chairs the FAS’ Committee on Course Registration, said prior to the vote on Tuesday that “nothing short of previous-term registration” will better allow undergraduates to explore their course options while providing them with “robust” advising. “The case for previous-term registration is an educational case, first and foremost,” he said. “It is not an administrative
The group suing Harvard and the University of North Carolina over their race-conscious admissions practices asked the United States Supreme Court to ban affirmative action in American higher education in a brief filed Monday, calling on justices to overturn precedents that allow universities to consider race as a factor in admissions. The court agreed in January to take up a pair of lawsuits filed by the anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admission that claim Harvard College and the University of North Carolina discriminate against Asian American applicants. SFFA’s Monday brief is the first major filing since the court announced it would take up the cases. In the 99-page filing, SFFA called on justices to overturn Grutter v. Bollinger, the Supreme Court’s 2003 decision that said the University of Michigan Law School could consider race as a factor in its admission process.
SEE SHOPPING PAGE 7
SEE SFFA PAGE 9
The U.S. Supreme Court, pictured in December 2019, is located at One First Street NE in Washington, D.C., where it stands across from the U.S. Captiol. CAMILLE G. CALDERA—CRIMSON PHOTOGRAPHER
Adams Removes Air Disinfection System BIDMC Postpones Panel After Backlash By CHRISTINE MUI CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
Last summer, as Harvard prepared to fully reopen its campus to students for the first time in more than a year, preventing the spread of Covid-19 was top of mind. Harvard, after all, had kept most students off campus for the entire 2020-2021 academic year — a more conservative approach than many other schools in the Boston area — leaving affiliates unsure of what the return to campus would bring. In July, as the new semester loomed, administrators in Adams House installed a set of air disinfection devices that appeared to be a part of the solution to preventing the spread of the virus in the house. The price tag was just shy of $9,000 — a reduced rate. But the devices — which were installed in the house’s dining hall and lower common room — lasted just a few weeks. In early December, Harvard removed them, following a recommendation from the University’s Coronavirus Advisory Group.
SEE ADAMS PAGE 7
By VIVI E. LU and LEAH J. TEICHHOLTZ CRIMSON STAFF WRITERS
Adams House is located at 26 Plympton Street. JULIAN J. GIORDANO—CRIMSON PHOTOGRAPHER
research center at the HarA vard-affiliated Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center has postponed a panel on autism awareness after an undergraduate-authored petition garnered more than 1,400 signatures condemning the College for publicizing the event. The petition, circulated widely on Change.org, calls on Harvard College to publicly “withdraw support” for an event titled “Autism Awareness: Thinking Outside the Box” hosted by the Sadhguru Center for a Conscious Planet — a multidisciplinary research center at the BIDMC, a Harvard Medical School teaching hospital. The authors of the petition alleged the College implicitly supported the event by including it in a Weekly Update email to undergraduates. The event, described as a “multidisciplinary panel to explore Autism beyond conventions,” was set to feature nine speakers. After the petition was
circulated, the event listing for the panel, which was set to occur virtually last Wednesday, was taken down. “One of the panel’s goals is to highlight methods of ‘treating’ Autism. This is not only violently ableist but scientifically incorrect,” the petition reads. “Adding in phrases like ‘how to communicate’ and ‘savant autism’ in conjunction suggest an alien-like nature to Autistic people. We are human, too.” In an emailed statement, a Sadhguru Center spokesperson apologized for “any unintended distress” due to the event and wrote that the Center postponed the panel after learning of the concerns in the petition. “We are grateful to those who brought important aspects of the event to light and always intend for our actions to be respectful and inclusive,” the statement read. “We are pausing, deeply reflecting and learning before we consciously take next steps.” Kristin B. King ’23-’24 authored and circulated the
SEE PETITION PAGE 9
Some Ivy Schools Have Stopped Publicizing Admissions Data By RAHEM D. HAMID and NIA L. ORAKWUE CRIMSON STAFF WRITERS
As acceptance rates to the country’s most selective universities fall to all-time lows each year, more elite schools have stopped promoting key admissions data, including acceptance numbers and demographic breakdowns. This year, three Ivy League schools — the University of Pennsylvania, Cornell, and Princeton — declined to release admissions data on the day acceptance letters were sent out, a trend Stanford started in 2018. Cornell first stopped publicizing its data in 2020. Schools are required by the federal government to report admissions data each year — but the numbers come out months after admissions decisions, buried in a Department of Education documents and Common INSIDE Harvard Today 2 THIS ISSUE
Data Set filings. In August 2018, as future 2023 college graduates began filling out applications, Stanford University announced it would not publish its admissions data when decisions would be released. The year prior, the school’s acceptance rate was just 4.3 percent — the lowest in the country. “The main result we observe is stories that aim to identify which universities experience the most demand and have the lowest admit rates,” Stanford Provost Persis Drell said in the 2018 announcement. “That is not a race we are interested in being a part of.” Most of its peer institutions — including Harvard — initially declined to follow suit. But two years later, Cornell announced it would also stop publicizing its data, beginning with the class of 2024, for which
Arts 3
News 7
it only published early decision numbers. This year, two more Ivies — Princeton and Penn — followed. Harvard has continued to release its admissions data — including this March, when the College accepted a record-low 3.19 percent of applicants. Asked about the school’s policies, Harvard College spokesperson Rachael Dane wrote that the school has “made no decisions regarding sharing this information.” Rationale Behind the Shift The elite institutions that have stopped publicizing data all cited the effect the numbers can have on prospective applicants, given increased selectivity.
SEE RATES PAGE 7
Editorial 8
Sports 10
CAMILLE G. CALDERA—CRIMSON DESIGNER
TODAY’S FORECAST
RAINY High: 54 Low: 48
VISIT THECRIMSON.COM. FOLLOW @THECRIMSON ON TWITTER.
lost