Issue 15

Page 1

The Record

Volume 118 Issue 15

Horace Mann’s Weekly Newspaper Since 1903

record.horacemann.org January 8th, 2021

Parents, alumni receive COVID-19 vaccine Emma Colacino Staff Writer Dr. Robert Grossberg ‘88 has barely seen his mother in the past nine months due to concerns about transmitting COVID-19. However, receiving the new vaccine gives him hope that he can reunite with his mother and other family members, he said. “It’ll be nice to feel like maybe I could give her a hug,” he said. Healthcare professionals in the school’s community, such as Grossberg, are among the first to receive vaccinations in New York. On December 18, the first day the vaccine was available to him, Dr. Anthony Aizer P’25 P’26, who works at the New York University Medical Center, received it from one of the hospital sites in Brooklyn. The hospital prioritized the distribution of the vaccine to healthcare workers based on an individual’s risk of contracting the virus or spreading the virus to others, Aizer said. “I see many patients every day, in the range of 10 to 50 in a day, which means that not only are they exposed to me, but I’m exposed to them,” he said. “So if I can reduce the risks of transmission of COVID, to my patients or to myself, I want to do that.” Like Aizer, Dr. Sudheer Jain P’27 P’29 received a vaccine from the Bellevue Hospital where he works. Jain’s hospital also distributed vaccines based on the highest risk of contracting COVID, allowing those who work in the Emergency Room and ICU to receive doses first, he said. Jain was glad to receive the vaccine, he said. “I was physically here back in March and April during the worst times, and it’s hard to describe the scenes you’d see,” he said. “Excitement came from the fact that there was finally something working in our favor.” Dr. Peter Angevine P’24 P’26, who works and

received the vaccine at the New York Presbyterian Hospital, felt lucky to be in the first group of people being vaccinated, he said. “[New York Presbyterian] was a hospital that was one of the hardest hit in Manhattan,” he said. “A lot of people were very excited and proud to be part of the first group to get the vaccine.” Aizer and Avengine received the vaccine created by the Pfizer pharmaceutical company, which utilizes mRNA to create the virus’s spike protein on cells and triggers an immune response in the body. Jain received the vaccine created by the Moderna Biotechnology company. Both vaccines require two doses to be administered either 21 or 28 days apart according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Dr. Monica Prasad Hayes P’25 P’27, who was also vaccinated with the Moderna vaccine, said the technology does not use any part of the virus, which ensures that recipients of the vaccine will not contract COVID, she said. “At the same time, because this is a new technology that is first in human use, that has caused a little trepidation for people who are contemplating getting the vaccine.” Dr. Eugene Tolunsky P’22, who received the Moderna vaccine, said that the new vaccine technology is trustworthy given the testing that occurred before its release, he said. “It’s a novel idea, it’s a novel approach, but it was adequately tested,” he said. “The data for both trials is solid, and I really do not think that this vaccine was pushed through or not adequately evaluated.” Dr. Hooman Azmi P’22 P’23, who received the Pfizer vaccine, said the mRNA technology could be used to treat cancer, given the research that has been put into using the technology for this vaccine. “The silver lining for the coronavirus is that we may end up getting some very important anti-

cancer vaccines from these efforts.” Dr. Rabia de Latour P’35 read the published data and papers closely before receiving the Pfizer vaccine, she said. “Anyone who has concerns about [the vaccine] should do the same, or ask someone to interpret it for them,” she said. “It’s very important to look at the science and trust the science.” Dr. Ed Lin’s P’27 found the process of receiving the vaccine to be relatively straightforward, he said. “Our health system was actually one of the first providers to start giving the vaccine to frontline workers,” he said. “We quickly received emails, giving us the ability to make an appointment within the hospital to get the vaccine.” On the other hand, since Dr. Doug Ewing P’27 ‘87 was a part of a clinical trial, receiving the vaccine was more complicated. During a three hour session he had a physical examination, answered many questions, and had vials of blood and a nasal swab taken, he said. “It was a pretty involved process,” he said. “Then finally, they gave me the vaccine after several hours there and it was just a regular shot in the arm.” Moreover, it is possible that Ewing was given a placebo during the trial, instead of the vaccine, he said. “They’re going to be telling us this week which group we fell into and the people who got the placebo will be offered the actual vaccine within the next couple weeks,” he said. After receiving the actual vaccine, Ewing will continue to follow COVID protocols, he said. “I’ll have a little bit more peace of mind I think, but I think it’s still important to maintain those public health measures.” Similarly, de Latour will also maintain the same routines she established before receiving the vaccine, but she feels safer in terms of protecting her family, she said. “It’s hard to deal with the

emotional burden as a physician knowing that you could get a family member sick,” she said. “I think once fully vaccinated I’ll feel better knowing there is a very high likelihood that I’m protected from this and that I can no longer pose that risk to them.” Azmi’s son, Mazyar Azmi (11), said he trusted his father would be safe when working in the hospital before he was vaccinated because of the excellent personal protective equipment (PPE) and ventilation at the hospital, he said. “I always knew he was going to be fine working in the hospital because of the provided PPE, but now we’re even more confident because of the growing number of vaccinated employees.” Tolunsky is hopeful that a sense of normalcy will return as more people receive the vaccine. “I think that this is our path forward out of this pandemic,” he said. “It’s pretty clear that this virus is not going to disappear on its own and this is really the way we can try to get it over and behind us.”

Felix Brener/Staff Artist

Community debates ethics of traveling over winter break Mia Calzolaio and Serena Bai Staff and Contributing Writers This winter break, many families opted out of traveling due to fears of contracting and spreading the coronavirus. Before the break, Head of School Dr. Tom Kelly sent an email reminding the school community of the travel guidelines which they should follow. For out-of-state travel longer than 24 hours, the New York Department of Health requires that travelers obtain a test within three days of departure and prior to arrival in New York. Travelers must also quarantine for three days upon arrival in the state and obtain another test on the fourth day of their quarantine. If travelers test negative both times, they are allowed to stop quarantining. Kelly also added that families should avoid traveling to any destination that could cause them to quarantine and be unable to to return to school for the first day of in-person instruction on January 19. Over the break, Alex Nagin (11) traveled to his family’s house in a rural region of California, where he and his family quarantined and tested for the virus after their flight. For the most part, Nagin and his family have been staying around their house, occasionally going out to a coffee shop or going for a hike, he said. Nagin said the type of travel he did with his family Art Director/Rachel Zhu

is more acceptable than other types of travel because they did not come into contact with anyone after their flight, he said. Upper Division Library Department Chair Caroline Bartels said there is a false sense of normalcy that comes with vacationing, which is perpetuated by privilege. “It didn’t have to be this way,” she said. “We should have gotten a handle on this. It’s that really weird entitlement that I think Americans have of, ‘Well, those rules are for everybody else but not for me.’” For Nagin, the main issue with traveling arises when families attend private resorts. “When you get to a Caribbean island or Mexico or something, those communities that surround the resorts where these places are pretty uniquely unprepared to deal with spikes in COVID-19 cases, and that’s exactly what this type of travel is inducing,” he said. On the other hand, Izzy Abbott (12), who traveled with her family to a private house on a tropical island, said since the location of her stay has minimal COVID-19 cases and she and her family took proper precautions, her vacation was safe for those around her. “There was a consideration of our impact on local communities, but at the end of the day, we trusted in the local government’s guidelines and its ability to curtail any possible spread of the virus that we would have started anywhere,” she said. Abbott recognizes the stigma around traveling during this time; however, she believes that the decisive factor of travel is safety. “The stigma from traveling comes partly from people’s fears over the journeys themselves, getting on planes and being in airports where millions of people are passing through every single day, but in terms of the act of traveling itself, it’s safe as long as you are protecting yourself,” she said. Similarly, Ryan Rosenthal (12), who spent winter break in the city instead of his usual travels, believes that the decision to go on vacation is strictly a personal one. “It’s a pandemic,” he said. “You’re see Travel Plans on pg. 3

Editorial In The New Yorker, historian Jill Lepore wrote, “It’s a paradox of democracy that the best way to defend it is to attack it, to ask more of it, by way of criticism, protest, and dissent. ” We are students — but we are citizens first. It is our civic responsibility to engage in critical discussion concerning our government. We must have informed dialogue to hold our leaders up to our nation’s fundamental principles. On Wednesday, we were distressed to see rioters smashing windows, cops taking selfies with insurrectionists, and confederate flags waving through the halls of Congress for the first time in history, and we thank our teachers for dedicating their class time to discussing the news. In doing so, they acknowledged the severity of the events and our stake in them. These discussions cannot be limited to one or two class periods, however. We have lived through a moment that we will discuss with our children, and that students will learn about in history textbooks. We hope for a world in which nationwide crises do not interrupt our academic schedules, but even then, we must not abandon questions we have concerning the stability of our democracy, the racial injustice demonstrated in the lack of police response, and the role of a president’s dangerous rhetoric. The majority of the Editorial Board will graduate within months. To lead “great and giving lives,” we must take with us the academic lessons from Horace Mann — but we also must become civically active leaders, which begins with sparking conversations.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.