TODAY’S FORECAST HI: 74o LOW: 57o Richard McKinney | The Houstonian
Sen. Mike Apt (COBA) speaks during his impeachment hearing Tuesday night shortly before the SGA voted to remove him from his seat in the organization
Chance of Rain:
Computers move one step closer to becoming more “self-aware”
20%
P2
www.HoustonianOnline.com
Volume 123 / Issue 18
P2
Nduka, former SHSU football player, goes pro in Canadian league
P3
Thursday, March 28, 2013
DOMA , Prop 8 Stephen Green | The Houstonian
Oral arguments in gay marriage cases hint at potential outcome STEPHEN GREEN Editor-in-Chief LGBT students at Sam Houston State University and others around the world will soon have a landmark victory or a heartbreaking setback. The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for two gay marriage cases on Tuesday and Wednesday, the justices’ questions gave the public a glimpse into possible decision. DOMA The federal definition of marriage is the center of Windor v. United States. The Defense of Marriage Act, passed in 1996, limited federal recognition of marriage to between a man and a woman. Paul Clement, the lawyer defending DOMA, argued the federal government has the right to define marriage for purposes of federal law, just as states traditionally have the right to do it for themselves. In addition, he said DOMA was enacted to ensure that marriage was treated uniformly in all states. Justice Anthony Kennedy, usually known as the moderate justice, attacked the DOMA
defense lawyer questioning his attack on federalism. He said traditionally the individual states have had the right to define marriage. The federal government in this case, he said, is redefining marriage. Traditionally liberal leaning Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor questioned the logic of DOMA’s defense. Ginsburg attacked the statute on what she described as “pervasive” discriminatory action. “The state is saying there are two types of marriage: the full marriage and this...skim milk marriage,” she said. DOMA currently prevents same-sex couples from recieving federal benefits including tax exemptions, social security marriage benefits, family medical leave, recognition for immigration purposes, employment benefits of federal workers, and federal health coverage, among the 1,138 provisions that are affected by DOMA. Those advocating for DOMA to be overturned said the equality movement is becoming widespread. Chief Justice John Roberts said
the only reason for the rise in support “is because your side is more politically engaging.” PROP 8 The second Court case, Hollingsworth v Perry, questions the ability of states to define marriage. The same five justices heavily critiqued the lawyer defending Proposition 8, which defines marriage as between a man and woman. Texas is one state that has consitutionally banned same-sex marriage. The defense, represented by Charles Cooper, said the traditional definition of marriage was primarily for purposes of procreation. Kagan and Ginsburg immediately pounced on the idea that Prop 8 would also ban sterile couples and those over the age of 55 from the ability to marry. “Let me assure you, there aren’t many children going to come out of those marriages,” Kagan said. Cooper said even in the cases of couples over 55 the chance that couples would procreate would still exist. Kennedy also asked Cooper for specific harms gay marriage would allow for. Cooper said it would alter the definition of
marriage on the basis of social justices. Thomas chooses not to ideology rather than necessity. speak at oral arguments. Kennedy was unhappy with The decision is expected in the answer saying it didn’t give July, or early in the summer. concrete examples and pressed him further. Justice Antonin Scalia interjected in an attempt to answer Kennedy’s question. “I don’t understand why you don’t give any concrete examples,” Scalia said. “Allowing gay marriage would allow for [joint] adoption.” Scalia said there has been no answer if children raised in single-sex households would be at a disadvantage over other children in opposite-sex marriages. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, along with Roberts and Scalia, AP Photo/The San Francisco Examiner, Anna Latino are considered the WAITING GAME. Little Lencioni waits outside of more conservative the California Supreme Court during arguments.
Justices hinting at upholding DOMA/Prop 8
Justices hinting at striking down DOMA/Prop 8
Sotomayor
Ginsburg
Kagan
Kennedy
Breyer
Thomas
Roberts
Alito
Scalia
‘It ain’t yo beauty, it’s yo booty’ C
omedian Mike Epps and his opening act Scruncho hit the stage on Monday night for the 2013 spring showcase in Johnson Colesium hosted by the Division of Student Services. With his hilarious facial expressions and body language, Epps had the crowd bursting with laughter as he did not hold back on anyone or anything. He called out cougars, bad breath, baldheaded people and women with lace front wigs (right). Students cheered and jumped out of their chairs with excitement as Epps even jumped off the stage and walked into the audience and up in bleachers to roast students and faculty (below). His opening act, Scruncho, took audience interaction to another level as he got “the whitest guy in the room”, student David Kelley, to join him on stage for a full-fledged gangster lesson including a backwards cap, sagging pants and gangster walk (left). Read the full story and audience reactions to Epps’ performance on page 4. George Mattingly | The Houstonian
Yolisma Vance | The Houstonian