9-10-13

Page 1

WHAT’S INSIDE? SHSU President gave State of the University Pro/Con: Adblock loved and hated Manziel, Aggies run over SHSU defense

Pg 4 P2 P3 P5

TOMORROW’S FORECAST

HI: LOW:

Movies soon to hit the big screen

94o 72o

AP Photo/FilmDistrict, Matt Kennedy

Chance of Rain:

Follow us today! @TheHoustonian

20%

www.HoustonianOnline.com

Volume 124/ Issue 4

Facebook.com/ TheHoustonian

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

SPACE

Humans could be the real Martians, study says CHRISTIAN VAZQUEZ Staff Reporter In popular culture, Martians are depicted as green, cold and slimy creatures with elongated fingers and eyeballs. If a new study is to be believed, all we need to do is look into a mirror to see the real Martians. According to a new study presented at the annual Goldschmidt Geochemistry Conference in Florence, Italy, there is compelling evidence that life on Earth received a vital push from Mars. Steve Benner from The Westheimer Institute for Science and Technology in Florida, said the conditions here on Earth 3.5 to 4 billion years ago would have made it impossible for life to occur on its own. The basis of Benner’s research is the theory of abiogenesis, where life spontaneously formed from organic compounds, which were also formed spontaneously. This is commonly accepted among many scientists. However, scientists don’t know whether abiogenesis occurred on Earth, or somewhere else and was then deposited here via meteorite, known also as panspermia.

Benner stated that around 3.5 to 4 billion years ago the conditions on Mars for abiogenesis would have been perfect. This is because Benner believes that RNA could have only been created around highly oxidized molybdenum and boron. In a nutshell, the building blocks for RNA, crucial for basic life, were non-existent on Earth, Brenner said. Earth didn’t have an oxygen rich atmosphere 3 billion years ago, which would make the form of molybdenum unavailable. Also, boron couldn’t have been available either since the mineral is only found in extremely dry places. The key point of his research is to show that since the materials for RNA was not present on Earth during that period of time, it had to have come from Mars. Benner believes that Mars had an atmosphere and dry areas enough where boron could form in high concentrations. Given the conditions, he hypothesizes that if RNA-based organisms did actually form on Mars, then it is possible that life on Earth came from Mars because of the short distance. While the public announcement of his research has been gaining ground, not everyone is

Kassidy Turnpaugh | The Houstonian, Kevin M. Gill | Flikr

completely on board. Both Patrick J. Lewis, Ph.D., associate professor of paleobiology and Chris Randle, Ph.D., associate professor of molecular systematics at Sam Houston State University weren’t completely on board but didn’t rule-out the idea. “On a personal level, I’d say it’s quite plausible,” Lewis said. “But as

CAMPUS

a scientist, I’d say there are a few holes that need to be addressed before everyone can jump on it”. Lewis disagreed with Benner’s claims that life was non-existent 3.5 to 4 billion years ago, and said that life can be found in the most inhospitable of places even today. “From ancient subterranean lakes in Antarctica, to geysers,

and even the ocean floor, life can happen just about anywhere,” Lewis said. Lewis also mentioned the Miller Urey experiment, which he said recreated the primitive conditions on Earth from billions of years ago and proved that basic life could —

MARS, page 2

TEXAS LEGISLATURE

Packed like sardines: Departments on campus limited space on campus dorms COLIN HARRIS

Assistant News Editor

In order to meet the demand of the growing number of students who live on campus, Sam Houston State University will be building two dormitories scheduled to be open by the 2016-17 academic year, according to officials. The new facilities, tentatively named the South Residential District, will be located south of 21st Street between Ave. I and Ave. J, and should house approximately 650 students in total. The project is in the programming phase of new construction, where the need for new facilities is location, funding and scope of the project is established. “Programming is done with a company contracted through TSUS (Texas State University System),” Denise Neu, director of facilities planning and construction, said. “It involves determining spatial adjacencies as well as qualitative and quantitative information about the proposal.” The site for the project is currently home to a university-operated commuter parking lot and the Richmond Apartments, which were purchased by SHSU in 2012. The Richmond Apartments will be demolished to clear space for a new parking lot, and the South Residential District dorms will be

built where the parking lot lies. The proposal also includes a road expansion to provide better access to the new residence halls. SHSU President Dana Gibson, Ph.D., said in her State of the University address that the university is at 99.7 percent capacity. Because of this, director of residence life Joellen Tipton said, special care must be taken during the programming stage of development in selecting a site that’s suitable for student needs. “A lot of times, when you need to build a new dorm, you can raze one of the old ones and construct on that lot,” Tipton said. “We can’t afford to lose a dorm for the length of time it would take to build another one in its place. During preplanning we had to determine where we had the space and where it was feasible to build the new residential complex.” Building new residence halls is imperative to match the university’s projected growth over the next decade, according to the updated Master Plan. “Each year, more and more upper classmen want to stay on campus,” Tipton said. “We’ve always had around 35 percent choose to renew [their on campus accommodations] every year, but that number is growing, because of the convenience factor and affordabil—

RES, page 2

Kassidy Turnpaugh | The Houstonian

Visit our website! www.HoustonianOnline.com

squished MOLLY WADDELL Associate Editor

Several departments on campus have to reevaluate growth plans because the Texas Legislature failed to pass tuition revenue bonds. Agriculture and engineering, art, and the nursing departments were in line to get new buildings by 2015 to help manage the growth of students, according to Texas State University System records. Tuition revenue bonds, or loans to an institution using tuition as the payback promise, were the main funding for the construction projects. The revenue bonds must be passed by the Texas Legislature in order for them to be given to the universities. Money for the Nursing, Biology and Allied Health Building was requested in SB16, which passed the House but failed to reach a vote in the Senate. Without this money and the new buildings, the departments are suffering, officials say. The art department needs new buildings, according to department chair Michael Henderson. The current art buildings do not provide enough space for the art students, he said, which spreads the students into other buildings around campus. Henderson wants all of the art students to be centrally located. “One of the issues we have (is that) the upper administration knows (the art department needs new buildings),” Henderson said. “So, they are hesitant to put money in our current buildings since they will be torn down soon,” In addition to inefficient space, he said the outside of the buildings are deteriorating. The art complex was built in the 1980’s. The new art complex is scheduled to be built in 2017. However, if the state denies the revenue bonds again, the university will

not get the $12.6 million that they need. The agricultural department took a hit as well.. According to the department’s chair, Stanley Kelley, Ph.D., their department has had record growth in the last 15 years. The agricultural department’s original building was torn down in the 1980’s and they were relocated to the Thomason building. According to Kelley, the department was told that it would be a temporary relocation until a new building could be constructed. “Our temporary relocation has (lasted) for 30 years now,” Kelley said. According to Kelley, the delay in a new facility has prevented the department from having modernized classroom and laboratory space. “We have no wall or floor outlets so students can charge or utilize electronic devices during class,” Kelley said. “[There are] no PODs or vending areas, and minimum gathering or social area for a department that has more than 1,100 majors.” In the last several years the department has become more specialized than what it had been previously, creating the need for additional space. “This specialization warrants the need for specialized lab space and equipment to not only meet curriculum needs but to allow faculty to remain competitive in their research and grant writing,” he said. Kelley said every faculty member wants more space for their office, lab, classroom or storage. “As an administrator we must make certain that we efficiently utilize our allocated space,” Kelley said. The new agriculture and engineering technology building was scheduled to be built in 2014, but with the lack of $9.8 million they

had requested in tuition revenue bonds, it may not happen. The total cost of the project is $20 million, where $10 million came from alumnus Fred Pirkle and the additional $200,000 will come from auxiliary funds. The school of nursing officials said they are also in need of a new building. Currently, they are only able to let 40 students in a semester due to the lack of space. “We have really outgrown this building,” Anne Stiles, Ph.D., chair of the school of nursing, said about the Academic Building III in a previous Houstonian article. The new building was supposed to start being built next year, but they needed $37.5 million from tuition revenue bonds to start to build their $39.7 million building. The tuition bonds not passing put the university in a tight spot, according to Provost and Vice President of Academic Affairs Jaimie Hebert, Ph.D. “Without those, we have to find another way to fund (academic buildings),” Hebert said. “Without having private money (donated) we may have to wait until the next legislative session (to build any academic buildings.)” SHSU wasn’t the only university that didn’t receive the revenue bonds. No Texas schools did. Hebert said this isn’t a problem for bigger schools like the University of Texas at Austin and Texas A&M because they have extra state funds. State-passed tuition bonds are the only funding for academic buildings except for private donations. “Bonding is critical funding,” Hebert said. “(SHSU) doesn’t have enough surplus. Not even close to enough to build buildings. We have to accomplish what we can in the space we have.” The next time tuition revenue bonds can be passed will be when the Texas Legislature meets in session again in 2015.

Be sure to check out the Houstonian Orientation Guide located around campus and the City of Huntsville! Can’t find one? Let us know and we’ll get you a copy.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.