Whittington vs. SHSU University Answer

Page 1

CAUSE NO. 1427000 ANITA BELLE WHITTINGTON, Plaintiff, v. SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant.

§ § § § § § §

IN THE DISTRICT COURT

WALKER COUNTY, TEXAS

12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

DEFENDANT’S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES Defendant Sam Houston State University (“SHSU”) files its Original Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff’s Original Petition. I. GENERAL DENIAL Pursuant to Rule 92,

TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,

and for the express purpose of

requiring the Plaintiff to meet her burden of proof, Defendant denies every allegation contained in Plaintiff’s Original Petition, and demands strict proof thereof as required by law. II. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Pleading further, Defendant asserts that it is entitled to the following affirmative defenses: 1.

This court lacks jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant.

2.

Defendant asserts the defense of sovereign immunity as to any of Plaintiff’s claims for which there has been no statutory or express waiver.

3.

Defendant asserts the defense of limitations to the extent applicable to any cause of action asserted by Plaintiff.

4.

Plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies and meet all statutory prerequisites prior to filing this lawsuit. Filed: 1/22/2015 11:17:45 AM Robyn M. Flowers District Clerk Walker County, Texas Melissa Fuentes


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Whittington vs. SHSU University Answer by The Houstonian - Issuu