WWW.JOURNAL-ONLINE.CO.UK
EDINBURGH'S STUDENT NEWSPAPER
ISSUE XLV
WEDNESDAY 9 MARCH 2011
The internet: where humans dare to tread The CEO of an Edinburgh social web startup tells The Journal how internet crowd-sourcing is redefining how we gather and intepret data
QMU VP sought presidential noconfidence vote
» 13
IN NEWS >> 3
Art imitating life An investigation by The Journal reveals that as ECA’s finances were crashing, senior staff pay increased
Ousted president Blain Murphy claims Christie McMonagle "did not speak to him for five months" before she initiated disciplinary action Hannah Raine Recently-released minutes from an extraordinary meeting of Queen Margaret University’s Student Parliament show that the disciplinary action which ended with the sacking of union president Blain Murphy w initiated by vice-president and former running-mate Christie McMonagle. The governing body of Queen Margaret University Students’ Union (QMUSU) voted 12-6 to support a noconfidence motion on the grounds that Mr Murphy had not fulfilled his responsibilities as president, at the meeting on 17 February. Evidence submitted in support of the motion claimed that Mr Murphy, who was a sabbatical officer being paid a salary of £15,779, exhibited a general lack of effort and poor timekeeping
skills. Members of the Student Parliament also heard that on one occasion in early February, Mr Murphy took time off work due to illness, but that he attended a party that evening and that “pictures from Facebook show [Mr Murphy] drunk and not ill.” The minutes note that Ms McMonagle “said she assumed, but admitted she had no evidence, that [Mr Murphy] was hungover after the Super Bowl. [Mr Murphy] is known to be a fan of the Super Bowl.” In his defence, Mr Murphy claimed that he had been taking medication and had felt much better that evening. It has also emerged that Mr Murphy had posted negative comments about the National Union of Students on Facebook, around the time of last November’s student protests in Continued on Page 2
IN NEWS >> 6/7
Results revealed Edinburgh’s students cast their votes and elect their sabbatical officers for the 2011/2012 academic year
IN COMMENT >> 15
Yunus' reckoning
Protests in Edinburgh as Universities UK urge the introduction of tuition fees in Scotland
»9
Can beleaguered microfinance pioneer Muhammad Yunus and his Grameen Bank resist the Bangladeshi government's onslaught?
Scottish Universities fall behind by £200m a year First official figures suggest a larger funding gap for Scottish universities than expected Lily Panamsky Academic News Editor Scottish universities will face an annual funding shortfall of £200 million beginning in 2014, official estimates suggest. These numbers, released in early March, are the first official statistics to give an estimate of the Scottish funding gap. The Scottish Government has argued that the actual gap would be just £93 million a year, if higher tuition fees for non-Scottish UK students were introduced. The government has proposed to
increase tuition fees for all UK students outside of Scotland from the current £1,800 to £6,375 starting from 2012. Additionally, as reported on page nine in this issue of The Journal, Universities Scotland has recommended introducing tuition fees of £3,290 for Scottish students. Last year, Westminster decided to increase English university tuition fees to anywhere between £6,000 and £9,000 following nation-wide education cuts. While most high profile universities will hover around the £9,000 mark, it has been suggested that the average tuition fees will be £7,500. This sparked
concerns that universities north of the Border would lag behind in funding and prestige. Education secretary Mike Russell stated that £93 million, “is a significant amount of money but, critically, it is an amount that allows a political choice to be made. It is nothing like some of the ridiculous scare-story figures [being] bandied about.” Another proposal to bridge the Scottish funding gap has been to introduce graduate contribution fees. Liam Burns, president of NUS Scotland, said: “Over recent weeks we’ve heard doomsday scenarios from
university principals including threats to cut university places by 40 per cent next year. “However, we can now see that some of these warnings have been nothing more than scaremongering, trying to bounce students, parents and politicians in Scotland into reintroducing tuition fees into Scotland.” Mr Burns remained optimistic that the funding gap could be solved without resorting to higher tuition fees or graduate contribution. A proposal from the Scottish government on how to bridge the funding gap is expected in the next few weeks.
IN FILM >> 17
Walking the Beat A new biopic presents a challenging reexamination of the life and work of Beat poet and literary legend Alan Ginsberg