M THE MANEATER
The student voice of MU since 1955
www.themaneater.com
Vol. 82, Issue 22
MARCH 2, 2016
MSA
MSA discusses new petitioning legislation #:;%&<'=%&$: Staff Writer
The Missouri Students Association’s recent lack of transparency with the student body has led former Senate Speaker Kevin Carr to unveil a piece of legislation that he hopes will change how MSA interacts with students. At the full Senate meeting Feb. 24, Carr presented legislation that would create a process for students to petition MSA in the same way that citizens can petition the national government. If passed on March 9, his legislation would mandate that MSA hear and issue an official opinion on any concern a student brings to MSA if that student has obtained a set number of signatures. “The ultimate goal of it would be for people in Senate to realize that they need to take opinions that students have and then own them,” Carr said. “If we don’t do that then we’re not serving students. Regardless of how tough those conversations are and regardless of how serious the topics are, we shouldn’t shy away from them.” Carr’s legislation was denied by Senate and sent back to committee almost immediately after it was brought to the floor. Carr was not surprised and said certain elements of his legislation needed to be reviewed before it passes. He plans on working out the details with the Operations Committee to redefine some of the legislation’s more “mechanical parts.” Chief among these is the required amount of signatures a petition must have before it appears on the Senate floor. Currently, that number is set at 100, but this could change depending on what the committee decides. “If we make the number too low, we run the risk of having potentially frivolous things drop on our desk,” Operations Committee member Saad Malik said. “If we make it too high, we run into the discouragement factor. It is a balancing act.” The act is set to become a constitutional amendment, meaning it will have to be passed by Senate as well as voted on by the students during a referendum. Carr said it will not appear on the ballot during MSA’s special presidential election but might be present for the academic senator ewlection later in the spring. “There’s some discussion of whether or not we want this to be in the constitution because once
MSA | Page 4
COURTESY OF LACY RUSHIN
Board of Curators
!+,-./0'1,2,34'0562.0'7,0-800,93 After the UM System Board of Curators’ decision to fire the professor, faculty members have questioned their own ability to stand up for students. !"#$%&'($)*&" Staff Writer A professor’s firing rarely makes national news. But since November, Melissa Click’s name has become a narrative of its own, culminating with her firing Feb. 25. Her story is well-known. Following UM System President Tim Wolfe’s resignation Nov. 9, the former assistant communication professor was caught on camera calling for “muscle” to remove student journalist Mark Schierbecker from Concerned Student 1950’s campsite. The video has since received close to 3 million views, drawing support and ire from various groups around the nation. Two debates were sparked that day: First Amendment rights and what constitutes acceptable behavior for a faculty member. Since then, Click has been sent hate mail, targeted by Missouri lawmakers, called a heroine, suspended and, on Feb. 25, fired. Click’s firing elicited varying responses from those following her story, and the debate about how faculty should behave is ongoing.
The firing UM System Board of Curators Chairwoman Pam Henrickson, interim UM System President Mike Middleton and interim MU Chancellor Hank Foley held a conference call with the press Feb. 25 to announce Click’s firing. The board voted 4–2 to fire her following an investigation. Click can appeal her termination, Henrickson said during the conference call, and she added that the board had gone to “significant lengths” to ensure fairness for Click during the investigation and decision process. Click has until March 4 to write to the board explaining why she does not think she should be fired. If no appeal is made, then the board’s decision is final. Click was suspended Jan. 27 after a second video came to light showing her shouting profanity at a police officer while standing between student demonstrators and police at the October Homecoming parade. The same day the board suspended Click, it also authorized an investigation of her conduct since November, which Click responded to Feb. 19. The curators reviewed the report and response before voting. “The board respects Dr. Click’s right to express her views and does not base this decision on her support for students engaged in protest or their
CLICK | Page 4
#'0>3,92/0' 162>?>++' @939+948> More than 100 women took the stage to celebrate vaginas.
page 3
What’s better than doughnuts? True/False-themed doughnuts.
page 10
The good Missouri basketball team eyes postseason success.
page 15