Features On Page 3:
Arts & Entertainment On Page 5:
Alumna receives green leadership award
Sports On Page 7:
Bobick performs
Men’s basketball
in three different
ranked eighth in
languages
preseason poll
The MERCIAD
Read more inside & online
Est. 1929 Vol. 90 No. 9
Mercyhurst university
Wednesday, noveMber 16, 2016
University acts swiftly
Administration forms united front in response to bias-based incident By Karah Hollis Editor-in-Chief
Late last Tuesday, a student brought a racially charged Snapchat to the attention of Mercyhurst University via Twitter. Immediately, the university began responding to concerned students on the social media platform. Faculty and staff quickly rallied behind the scenes to address the issue. On Wednesday morning around 9:30, students received an email from President Michael T. Victor who voiced his disdain for the post and his support for the affected community. A second email followed that morning announcing a forum in the Performing Arts Center that students could attend that afternoon to ask questions and to hear from Victor and other student life administrators. “I was sickened last night to learn of a student’s racially charged social media post that went far afoul of our core values,” Victor said. “I cannot erase the pain, the anger, frustration that this offensive post has brought to bear on our University family. Particularly for members of our African American community.” The act was determined to be a bias-based act. The student handbook describes this type of act to be anything that “violate(s) another person’s rights…(i.e. Race, sex, gender, sexual orientation, color, creed, religion, disability, national origin, age, or status as a veteran).” A $250 fine, disciplinary probation and possible suspension are also possible repercussions for committing a bias-based act. According to the handbook, the conduct process begins with the documentation of the event. The report is then submitted to the Student Conduct Office. A preliminary review is conducted by the assistant director of Residence Life and Student Conduct. If the incident is found to be substantial, it is then passed to a Student Conduct Panel or the director of Residence Life and Student Conduct. The student or students involved will be notified and will be requested to schedule a meeting to talk about the issue. The case moves on to a
Merciad Index
Miranda L. Miller photo
The racist post made on social media was handled swiftly by administrators. A university panel addressed the issue and answered questions at a forum Wednesday.
hearing which is overseen by a Student Conduct Panel. The panel is made up of two faculty members, two staff members and two students. Each individual has gone through training and has sat on the panel before. A facilitator is typically present, but does not have any voting rights. Any other individuals participating in the hearing are invited and approved by the adjudicating authority. Witnesses may also be called in. Questions are then asked to help determine what exactly happened. Punishments can include but are not limited to suspension and expulsion. Students are able to appeal any decisions made by the board. Normally, students are on campus for the entire process. Due to the specific conditions, the students involved were suspended. “In this case we felt that a hostile environment was created, and that it was such an egregious act that we felt we needed to suspend them immediately and have them off campus, which means, just for clarity, they are not acting
as students,” said Laura Zirkle, vice president of Student Life. “They are not allowed on campus, they are not going to class, they are not allowed to go to any of our events or the library or anything like that. They are not permitted here at all.” Because of the severity of this offense, the Student Conduct Office moved swiftly. Megan McKenna, director of Residence Life and Student Conduct, was notified by one of her assistant directors. She then spoke with Zirkle and Pertrina Marrero, director of the Multicultural Center, the same of evening of the incident. “I think it’s crucial (to move quickly with this type of issue). We wanted students to know that we were aware, and by the responses (on Twitter), it was letting students know that we are aware and that we are in the process of fact-gathering and trying to find out information,” McKenna said. “It is important students know that we’re on it. And that it is important to us.” After McKenna, Zirkle and
Marrero had a collective discussion, the Student Life staff, including Zirkle, met with Victor to brief him on the incident. The forum was the result of this meeting. “We called up MSG, and the MSG people who responded were the ones we were able to get,” Zirkle said. Some students were concerned about bias by those assisting in sorting the questions written down by students at the forum. “They weren’t picking and choosing the questions that would get answered, they were collating because we had 10 people asking about the same thing,” David Dausey, provost and vice president for Academic Affairs, said. The Marketing and Public Relations department did not waste any time responding to students on Twitter. According to Zirkle, they attempted to respond to every student post whether it was thanking them for their support or clarifying misinformation. “Some have questions and they have tried to respond as quickly as possible so that
people aren’t left out there in a vacuum like their opinions don’t matter, because they do matter,” Zirkle said. Chris Norris, web/social media/video coordinator, emphasized the impact of social media and how the university responded. “We put a high value on social media as a tool to communicate and engage with our students, families and community members. That means we strive to reply to every single tweet, post or comment,” said Norris. “Due to the nature of what was shared, we felt that everyone deserved to be acknowledged with their concerns and questions and we did our very best in communicating a resolution.” Although this incident has negatively affected the campus, it has sparked positive conversation. “I think it’s also important when really bad things happen, to find a way to make good things come from them,” said Zirkle. “We need to not let this be a moment that happens in passing, but a moment that kind of forms
who we are, and not let this be a wasted moment.” Sister Lisa Mary McCartney, one of the Sisters of Mercy, was part of the forum panel. McCartney stated that 10 years ago, the Sisters of Mercy met to establish five critical concerns for the 21st century. One of those concerns was racism. “The best thing you can do to further the mission of Mercyhurst and the Sisters of Mercy is to search out your own racism and to expel it and to turn to ways of love. Love is the only thing that is going to get any of us away from our prejudices. Love is very effective at bringing healing and harmony among peoples. So, I would ask you to think in your own hearts about where racism resides and to ask God for mercy,” she said. Students did step out on Twitter, exemplifying the Mercy Mission, according to Norris.
Continued on page 2.
Online Poll Results
Are you happy with the new president??
News Features A&E Opinion Sports Laker Living
1-2 3 4-5 6 7 8
Yes! It was the result I was hoping for. (18%) No! I am outraged at the results. (74%) There is a new president? What happened to Obama? (6%,) I didn’t vote and didn’t really care.(2%)
Be sure to vote in this week’s online poll:
Are you ready for the impending snow? merciad.mercyhurst.edu